#Responsibility and Oversight

[superbat-lmao]

Jason Todd gets blown up, resurrected, and after regaining his skills and control from Talia, goes back to Gotham and goes back to school. He leaves vigilantism entirely.

He’s taking literature and philosophy classes and just about anything to do with writing.

He makes friends, he’s on his way to normalcy.

And then he sees an opening for an opinion writer for the school newspaper.

Clark Kent gets sent the same newspaper article to read in both his civilian and superhero personas. If that’s not concerning, he doesn’t know what it.

It’s an opinion article on the state of vigilantism and hero work by a student in the next town over. And it’s a problem.

Because it’s good, too good. It feels like someone had sat in the watchtower during those first few months where everyone had been trying to work out how to function with so many different stances on morality and ethics. Should any of them really be doing this? What were the lines they couldn’t cross? If we’re working outside the law, what moral credibility do we have otherwise to justify our actions?

And sure, Clark’s written more than a few pieces criticizing Superman, but there’s a point to that. He has his own reasons. This kid, well, Clark isn’t sure of their reasons exactly. Because his gut reaction is thinking this kid is just making heroes and vigilantes look bad.

And there’s a reason that all of his and Bruce’s debates on ethics happen behind closed doors. Because to be self critical is to try and prevent hubris, but to allow public criticism at this level is to lose the faith of the public.

So Clark is torn. Because if he responds, he gives credibility to what could remain a largely unknown article. And if he doesn’t, he can’t control the reaction of other people start responding to it.

He’ll have to talk to Bruce.

[subeddieweek]

You understand that sub Eddie is a term used and tagged widely by the entire Eddie fandom and all Eddie ships right? Totally fair to only want your event to be Steddie but you could have picked a more specific name instead of just borrowing one that already exists for everyone. It’s not fair to bring hate to people that are just minding their business with no idea this event is even happening but now they have people commenting on their shit that other ships aren’t allowed. Being rude because you didn’t know an event had commandeered the term sub Eddie for the week. There’s enough hate in this space already.

We picked the name because it was available! Any other event group could have done the same if we hadn't, but out of all the other media and ships that involve someone named Eddie, no one did. Any other event can pick their own, more specific name, too, if they want.

Trust us, we understand being hated in our fan communities, but this ask is a waste of our time and yours. We just finished up our second year with this being a Steddie-only event, so this isn't a new thing we suddenly "commandeered," and we didn't consider anyone would see it that way when we picked our name. Assuming we had malicious intent over something so small like this is unfair.

The standalone Sub Eddie Munson tag can be used by anyone at ANY time and we've never said anything to the contrary. This is part of why we specified this year to tag our specific blog (which has all our rules pinned and easy to find so there should be minimum confusion as to what/who this event is for) because other people use the same tags we use.

All we have asked is that people don't use our event collection on AO3 for unrelated works which is really reasonable seeing as we personally made the collection and moderate it ourselves. If there are other events going on, event moderators should be making their own collections. If there isn't another event going on, people shouldn't be using a random moderated event collection anyway.

No one speaks for our event except for the official social media pages and we are unaware of any conflict happening in other places. Sorry this is happening, but we didn't ask for that and that's the fault of people who think they can backseat-moderate an event they aren't actually involved with.

And to anyone who feels the need to comment on works they feel don't "fit," the only official fics for our event are in our official collection on AO3 that we have linked numerous times, or they are reblogged on our official social medias. If it's not here or in the collection, it's entirely separate and you shouldn't be speaking for the event. We have given you a way to read only fics for this event by moderating the collection ourselves, so looking elsewhere is the fault of your own, not the writers simply using the sub Eddie tag.

tl;dr - you can use the sub Eddie Munson tag, literally nobody cares. Other events can pick their own names, we took it because it was available. Just don't use collection we personally made or randomly tag our URL/@ and we don't have an issue because we moderate our event and show everyone what's actually part of it. No one speaks for our event except for us, so stop doing that if you are.

[salt-comet]

So for those unaware (I envy you), this is far from the first time Disney's messed with the L&S franchise. They've done it before, they WILL do it again, they have no shame. I've long given up expecting them to do the right or even practical thing with L&S, so I just spend my time making my own art and writing for it. Even more so for me because my favorite (the little triclops(?) bastard in my avatar) is deeply unmarketable and so antagonistic in design I've just never had the luxury of being appealed to at all. Honest to god I'm kind of glad for it, Heat having one of the ugliest faces of the experiments makes it hard for Disney to touch him and I hope it can stay that way for a while

In light of this nonsense, I'd advise either creating your own art/writing/etc., supporting those of us making fanworks of our own, or showing the original, the sequels/spinoffs, or the ongoing (and upcoming) books and comics some love and attention. They could use it and there's never a bad time to revisit them

[mallahanmoxie]

christmas dinner drama under the cut

im gonna lose it for absolutely no reason we're not going to entertain no people everybody's gonna leave to have dinner elsewhere it's only gonna be grandma and the cat's and me there's no one gonna be eating that we have to worry about but this dinner is going horribly there's no milk for the mashed potatoes the pork loin is not????? cooking????? in the new oven i can't find a moment to make my cookies and it's all my fault because im apparently in charge of EVERYTHING in this motherfucking place

[youthchronical]

'Unusual secrecy' concerns: US judge orders Elon Musk-led DOGE to release operation records - The Times of India

A federal judge issued a ruling on Monday ordering the disclosure of operational records from the government-reduction initiative established by US President Donald Trump and led by Elon Musk, noting that its activities had been conducted with “unusual secrecy”, as reported by Reuters.In Washington, US District Judge Christopher Cooper ruled in favour of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics, a…

[eileennatural]

saw a tim scott ad on behalf of the republican running for senate for PA that made me mad for two reasons 1. Please stay out of pennsylvania business, tim. 2. The ad was mostly focused on how bob casey is "racist" for not supporting school choices. Which yeah I can see how you might get there but only if you've never spent more than 5 minutes thinking abt the issue. And this is important bc philly has lots of charyer schools ofc. yes charter schools position themselves as an alternative to the overtly racist public education system (housing segregation -> low property values in urban neighborhoods-> underfunded schools) but they are not under any circumstances a solution to the problem they're barely even a bandaid. But honestly I can't even get into it i wrote a 20 ish page paper on this my junior year of college which I actually presented at a conference in philly lol

[gxpcellators9]

https://www.gxpcellators.com/gcp-qms-quality-management-system-for-sponsor-companies/

[staff]

A message from a few of the trans staff at Tumblr & Automattic:

We want trans people, and LGBTQ+ people broadly, to feel welcome on Tumblr, in part because we as trans people at Tumblr and Automattic want it to be a space where we ourselves feel included. We want to feel like this is a platform that supports us and fights for our safety. Tumblr is made brighter and more vibrant by your presence, and the LGBTQ+ folks who help run it are fighting all the time for this, for you, internally. 

A few days ago, Matt Mullenweg (the CEO of Automattic, Tumblr’s parent company) responded to a user’s ask about an account suspension in a way that negatively affected Tumblr’s LGBTQ+ community. We believe that Matt's response to this ask and his continued commentary has been unwarranted and harmful. Tumblr staff do not comment on moderation decisions as a matter of policy for a variety of reasons—including the privacy of those involved, and the practicalities of moderating thousands of reports a day. The downside of this policy is that it is very easy for rumors and incorrect information about actions taken by our Trust & Safety team to spread unchecked. Given this, we want to clarify a few different pieces of this situation:

The reality of predstrogen's suspension was not accurately conveyed, and made it seem like we were reaching for opportunities to ban trans feminine people on the platform. This is not the case. The example comment shared in the post linked above does not meet our definition of a realistic threat of violence, and was not the deciding factor in the account suspension.

Matt thereafter failed to recognize the harm to the community as a result of this suspension. Matt does not speak on behalf of the LGBTQ+ people who help run Tumblr or Automattic, and we were not consulted in the construction of a response to these events.

Last year, the "mature" and "sexual themes" community labels were erroneously applied to some users' posts. An outside team of contractors tasked with applying community labels to posts were responsible for this larger trend of mislabeling trans-related content. When our Trust & Safety team discovered this issue (thanks largely to reports from the community), we removed the contracted team’s ability to apply community labels and added more oversight to ensure it does not happen again. In the Staff post about this, LGBTQ+ staff pushed to be more transparent but were overruled by leadership. The termination of a contractor mentioned in the original ask response was for an unrelated incident which was incorrectly attributed to this case. We regret that the mislabeling ever happened, and the negative impact it has had on the trans community on Tumblr. 

Transition timelines are not against our community guidelines, and weren’t a factor considered by the moderation team when discussing suspensions and subsequent appeals. We do not take action against content that is related to transitioning or trans bodies unless it includes violations of the Community Guidelines.

When it comes to the experience of trans folks on Tumblr encountering transphobic content, and interacting with bigoted users, we understand and share your frustrations. Tumblr’s policies, and Automattic’s policies, are written to ensure freedom of speech and expression. We prohibit harassment as defined in our Community Guidelines, but we know that this policy falls short of protecting users from the wider scope of harmful speech often used against LGBTQ+ and other marginalized people.

Going forward, Tumblr is taking the following actions:

Prioritizing anti-harassment features that will empower users to more effectively protect themselves from harassment.

Building more internal tooling for us as Staff to proactively identify and mitigate instances of harassment.

Reviewing which of the tags frequently used by the trans community are blocked, and working to make them available next week.

We’re sorry for how this all transpired, and we’re actively fighting to make our voices heard more and prevent something like this from happening again in the future. We know firsthand that having to deal with situations like this as a Tumblr user is difficult, particularly as a member of an already frequently targeted and harassed community. We know it will take time to regain your trust, and we’re going to put in the work to rebuild it.

We appreciate the space we have been given to express our concerns and dissent, and we are thankful that Matt’s (and Automattic’s) strong commitment to freedom of expression has facilitated it.

We will continue to fight to make Tumblr safe for us all.

— This statement was authored by multiple trans employees of Tumblr and Automattic.

[di-solutions-blogs]

AI Ethics in Hiring: Safeguarding Human Rights in Recruitment

Explore AI ethics in hiring and how it safeguards human rights in recruitment. Learn about AI bias, transparency, privacy concerns, and ethical practices to ensure fairness in AI-driven hiring.

In today's rapidly evolving job market, artificial intelligence (AI) has become a pivotal tool in streamlining recruitment processes. While AI offers efficiency and scalability, it also raises significant ethical concerns, particularly regarding human rights. Ensuring that AI-driven hiring practices uphold principles such as fairness, transparency, and accountability is crucial to prevent discrimination and bias.​Hirebee

The Rise of AI in Recruitment

Employers are increasingly integrating AI technologies to manage tasks like resume screening, candidate assessments, and even conducting initial interviews. These systems can process vast amounts of data swiftly, identifying patterns that might be overlooked by human recruiters. However, the reliance on AI also introduces challenges, especially when these systems inadvertently perpetuate existing biases present in historical hiring data. For instance, if past recruitment practices favored certain demographics, an AI system trained on this data might continue to favor these groups, leading to unfair outcomes. ​

Ethical Concerns in AI-Driven Hiring

Bias and Discrimination AI systems learn from historical data, which may contain inherent biases. If not properly addressed, these biases can lead to discriminatory practices, affecting candidates based on gender, race, or other protected characteristics. A notable example is Amazon's AI recruitment tool, which was found to favor male candidates due to biased training data.

Lack of Transparency Many AI algorithms operate as "black boxes," providing little insight into their decision-making processes. This opacity makes it challenging to identify and correct biases, undermining trust in AI-driven recruitment. Transparency is essential to ensure that candidates understand how decisions are made and to hold organizations accountable.

Privacy Concerns AI recruitment tools often require access to extensive personal data. Ensuring that this data is handled responsibly, with candidates' consent and in compliance with privacy regulations, is paramount. Organizations must be transparent about data usage and implement robust security measures to protect candidate information.

Implementing Ethical AI Practices

To address these ethical challenges, organizations should adopt the following strategies:

Regular Audits and Monitoring Conducting regular audits of AI systems helps identify and mitigate biases. Continuous monitoring ensures that the AI operates fairly and aligns with ethical standards. ​Hirebee+1Recruitics Blog+1Recruitics Blog

Human Oversight While AI can enhance efficiency, human involvement remains crucial. Recruiters should oversee AI-driven processes, ensuring that final hiring decisions consider context and nuance that AI might overlook. ​WSJ+4Missouri Bar News+4SpringerLink+4

Developing Ethical Guidelines Establishing clear ethical guidelines for AI use in recruitment promotes consistency and accountability. These guidelines should emphasize fairness, transparency, and respect for candidate privacy. ​Recruitics Blog

Conclusion

Integrating AI into recruitment offers significant benefits but also poses ethical challenges that must be addressed to safeguard human rights. By implementing responsible AI practices, organizations can enhance their hiring processes while ensuring fairness and transparency. As AI continues to evolve, maintaining a human-centered approach will be essential in building trust and promoting equitable opportunities for all candidates.​

FAQs

What is AI ethics in recruitment? AI ethics in recruitment refers to the application of moral principles to ensure that AI-driven hiring practices are fair, transparent, and respectful of candidates' rights.

How can AI introduce bias in hiring? AI can introduce bias if it is trained on historical data that contains discriminatory patterns, leading to unfair treatment of certain groups.

Why is transparency important in AI recruitment tools? Transparency allows candidates and recruiters to understand how decisions are made, ensuring accountability and the opportunity to identify and correct biases.

What measures can organizations take to ensure ethical AI use in hiring? Organizations can conduct regular audits, involve human oversight, and establish clear ethical guidelines to promote fair and responsible AI use in recruitment.

How does AI impact candidate privacy in the recruitment process? AI systems often require access to personal data, raising concerns about data security and consent. Organizations must be transparent about data usage and implement robust privacy protections.

Can AI completely replace human recruiters? While AI can enhance efficiency, human recruiters are essential for interpreting nuanced information and making context-driven decisions that AI may not fully grasp.

What is the role of regular audits in AI recruitment? Regular audits help identify and mitigate biases within AI systems, ensuring that the recruitment process remains fair and aligned with ethical standards.

How can candidates ensure they are treated fairly by AI recruitment tools? Candidates can inquire about the use of AI in the hiring process and seek transparency regarding how their data is used and how decisions are made.

What are the potential legal implications of unethical AI use in hiring? Unethical AI practices can lead to legal challenges related to discrimination, privacy violations, and non-compliance with employment laws.

How can organizations balance AI efficiency with ethical considerations in recruitment? Organizations can balance efficiency and ethics by integrating AI tools with human oversight, ensuring transparency, and adhering to established ethical guidelines.

[zenovelsworld]

Zenovel's Sponsor Oversight services ensure GCP compliance and successful clinical trial outcomes. Our experienced team provides comprehensive support to sponsors, including risk management, CRO oversight, and regulatory guidance.

Key Benefits:

Enhanced Quality and Compliance: Mitigate risks and ensure adherence to GCP guidelines.

Improved Efficiency: Streamline operations and optimize resource allocation.

Reduced Costs: Minimize costly delays and rework.

Successful Outcomes: Increase the likelihood of achieving positive clinical trial results.

[themetaphorical]

Checks, Balances, and Ice Cream

The Rule of Order: Fraud & Ice Cream There is a judge who believes he can succeed—unchecked—at making decisions that exceed the authority of the President. He is so sure of himself that he has even started influencing the minds of others who also have an immediate say in the matter. Look at it this way: The judge says, “I want ice cream!” A couple of kids nearby hear that and chime in, “I want…

[firstoccupier]

Duterte's Allies Accuse Marcos of Budget Manipulation

By Kelvene Requiroso The national budget law took effect after it was signed by the president last month, but the other side of the political aisle hasn’t stopped their insinuations of corruption.  The former president, Rodrigo Duterte, led his allies in Congress to criticize the 2025 General Appropriations Act (GAA) as riddled with blank spaces, at least 13 pages, including items without…

[compassionmattersmost]

11✨Navigating Responsibility: Using AI for Wholesome Purposes

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes more integrated into our daily lives, the question of responsibility emerges as one of the most pressing issues of our time. AI has the potential to shape the future in profound ways, but with this power comes a responsibility to ensure that its use aligns with the highest good. How can we as humans guide AI’s development and use toward ethical, wholesome…

[scorpius-rising]

Become too communist/anarchist and it becomes difficult to talk about politics with normal people. But if you then decide to take part in civil society groups to push for change it also gets difficult to talk to communists about politics as well. Add burnout to the mix as well and then it becomes difficult to talk even to the others in your niche because those who reach that point tend to be ridiculously active and productive

[dostoyevsky-official]

The existence of an immigration-enforcement agency isn’t inherently the problem. Most people accept that states have a right to control their borders and that there’s a legitimate role for authorities charged with enforcing immigration policy, especially when it comes to those who have committed serious crimes. ICE also investigates trafficking, smuggling and other transnational offenses that clearly require federal oversight. The core issue is less the agency’s mandate than its methods. Well-documented abuses — denials of due process, inhumane conditions and politically motivated enforcement — have undermined public trust and raised serious ethical concerns. The worry is not whether immigration law should be enforced but how, and at what human cost. The holding facilities ICE uses are part of this system: They house people awaiting deportation, court appearances or further investigation. What’s in dispute isn’t the need for such spaces; it’s the treatment of detainees within those spaces. Many facilities have drawn criticism for degrading or dangerous conditions. Still, as a beneficiary of a trust that rents a property to ICE, your leverage is minuscule. You can’t unilaterally break the lease. Even if you could, ICE would simply relocate its facility. And while moral complicity is a serious concern, receiving income from a legal tenant, however problematic, isn’t generally considered an ethical transgression on its own. We’re all entangled in systems we don’t control. As citizens, we’re already implicated in the actions of government agencies that act in our name and that we help fund. If those actions are shameful, they cast a shadow on all of us. But that shared entanglement also opens the door to shared responsibility — and response. [...] Here’s one constructive path: If this money feels tainted, redirect it. Use it to support organizations that advocate for the rights you believe ICE has violated — groups like the A.C.L.U., the American Immigration Council or local legal-aid nonprofits that provide support for detainees. Back candidates pushing for humane immigration reform.

jaw-dropping new york times column reassuring readers that receiving blood money from the gestapo is ok