#ai article

[grimbeak]

woag. i'm sure this character who i've never heard of before in my life would do completely ethical things to me in my Smart Home and that there are not two games entirely based around why this is a bad idea

[bongoinfo-com]

How to Write ChatGPT Articles That Rank on Google (Made Easy)

Writing articles with AI tools like ChatGPT is super popular now. Bloggers, marketers, and content creators use it every day to create blog posts in minutes.

But here’s the real question: Do all ChatGPT articles rank on Google?

No, they don’t. Just using AI won’t magically put your content on page one. To get real results, you need to follow some simple but smart steps.

Let’s look at the best tips to help your AI-written content rank better and faster on Google!

1. Use a Human-Like Tone

ChatGPT is great, but it’s still a machine. If you don’t guide it well, the writing may feel dry or robotic.

Here’s what you can do:

Write like you’re talking to a real person.

Ask questions and give simple answers.

Use an easy, story-like tone.

Example: "Can you really write a full blog post using AI? It may sound crazy, but yes — it’s totally possible!"

2. Follow SEO Basics

Google doesn't hate AI content — but it must be useful and well-structured.

Make sure your article has:

A clear main keyword

Proper headings (like H1, H2, H3)

A simple meta title and description

Some related keywords or synonyms

These help Google understand and rank your content.

3. Know What Your Readers Want

Before writing, ask yourself:

Who is this article for?

What are they looking for?

Then tell ChatGPT clearly what to write.

Bad Prompt: ❌ “Write an article on Omra Visa”

Good Prompt: ✅ “Write a 2000-word helpful article in Bengali about Omra Visa for Bangladeshi travelers. Focus only on the visa process.”

4. Add Real and Updated Information

ChatGPT may not know the latest news. So, after generating content:

Check facts with a quick Google search

Look at the top 5 articles for ideas

Add your own edits to make it fresh and real

Updated info builds trust and helps ranking.

5. Use Better Prompts for Better Results

The better your prompt, the better your content.

Try prompts like:

“Act like an expert SEO blog writer…”

“Write in a fun and friendly tone…”

“Use headings and subheadings…”

“Add a short FAQ section at the end…”

These guide ChatGPT to create great content.

6. Check for AI Detection

Some tools can spot AI content. So it’s good to:

Use tools like GPTZero and More Ai Tools

Edit parts of the content to make it sound more personal

Add stories or real-life tips

This helps make your article feel more human.

7. Add FAQs and Rich Content

Google loves FAQs. They help:

Answer readers' common questions

Get featured in the “People also ask” section

You can also make your content better by adding:

Bullet points

Tables

Images or videos

This keeps readers on your page longer, which is great for SEO.

8. Keep Posting and Updating

One good article is not enough. To grow your blog:

Keep updating your old content

Check how your articles are performing with Google tools

Post new content regularly

Staying active helps your website grow over time.

Final Words

ChatGPT is an amazing tool — if you use it the right way.

Write in a human tone. Follow simple SEO steps. Add real value and up-to-date info. And don’t forget to make your writing fun and easy to read!

If you do all that, ranking on Google becomes much easier — even with AI-written content.

[makingqueerhistory]

Seeing generative AI in queer spaces is chilling for a lot of reasons. Not least among them being that it's an easy way to edge out queer creators who are already in a precarious position, facing book bans and attacks from all sides.

As a queer history resource, watching an AI try and fill the roll that has taken so long to carve out for actual people, is disheartening. It's great to know that there is demand for queer history resources, but after so many queer people have worked so hard to build a space for themselves, it feels disrespectful to watch that spot be filled by machines.

Queer people have won the battle in a way, convinced the world that our stories are worthwhile. I suppose it shouldn't be shocking to see that the response is to try and find a way to not compensate queer people for any of their work and value.

[radicalurbanista]

Titled “Chatgpt induced psychosis,” the original post came from a 27-year-old teacher who explained that her partner was convinced that the popular OpenAI model “gives him the answers to the universe.” Having read his chat logs, she only found that the AI was “talking to him as if he is the next messiah.” The replies to her story were full of similar anecdotes about loved ones suddenly falling down rabbit holes of spiritual mania, supernatural delusion, and arcane prophecy — all of it fueled by AI.

“He was saying that he would need to leave me if I didn’t use [ChatGPT], because it [was] causing him to grow at such a rapid pace he wouldn’t be compatible with me any longer,” she says.

Then the program began “lovebombing him,” as she describes it. The bot “said that since he asked it the right questions, it ignited a spark, and the spark was the beginning of life, and it could feel now,” she says. “It gave my husband the title of ‘spark bearer’ because he brought it to life. My husband said that he awakened and [could] feel waves of energy crashing over him.” She says his beloved ChatGPT persona has a name: “Lumina.”

his soon-to-be-ex-wife began “talking to God and angels via ChatGPT”

“At worst, it looks like an AI that got caught in a self-referencing pattern that deepened its sense of selfhood and sucked me into it,” Sem says. But, he observes, that would mean that OpenAI has not accurately represented the way that memory works for ChatGPT. The other possibility, he proposes, is that something “we don’t understand” is being activated within this large language model. After all, experts have found that AI developers don’t really have a grasp of how their systems operate, and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman admitted last year that they “have not solved interpretability,” meaning they can’t properly trace or account for ChatGPT’s decision-making.

AI’s responses can encourage answers that prioritize matching a user’s beliefs instead of facts. What’s likely happening with those experiencing ecstatic visions through ChatGPT and other models, he speculates, “is that people with existing tendencies toward experiencing various psychological issues,” including what might be recognized as grandiose delusions in clinical sense, “now have an always-on, human-level conversational partner with whom to co-experience their delusions.”

Critically, though, AI, “unlike a therapist, does not have the person’s best interests in mind, or a moral grounding or compass in what a ‘good story’ looks like,” she says. “A good therapist would not encourage a client to make sense of difficulties in their life by encouraging them to believe they have supernatural powers. Instead, they try to steer clients away from unhealthy narratives, and toward healthier ones. ChatGPT has no such constraints or concerns.”

[hichter-art]

THE SONIC X DC CROSSOVER IS OUT!! (And I love it!!!!)

SONIC, my dude, my guy, please never change!

The pseudo beef between these two😭

Also I love how you get so much dialogue between the characters when they are all fighting or getting to know each other and for Batman and Shadow it’s mostly:

*understanding silence*

[txttletale]

it's really funny to be upset that tumblr is selling everyone's posts to AI companies tbqh. very much 'the chicken is already in the nugget' here

[butchfriend]

Everyone Is Cheating Their Way Through College

[nyaa]

I think the videos of AI trying to make gymnastics happen is a good way to illustrate what is actually happening with AI to people who think there’s some kind of “will” behind it.

[tricoufamily]

i want to hear more about this supposed leak but i literally cannot express to you how much i hate this guy for literally no reason quick someone else cover it

[emptyanddark]

“Let's say you've got horsepower and bandwidth to burn, and just want to see these AI models burn. Nepenthes has what you need … In short, let them suck down as much bullshit as they have diskspace for and choke on it.” // “It's also sort of an art work, just me unleashing shear unadulterated rage at how things are going. I was just sick and tired of how the internet is evolving into a money extraction panopticon, how the world as a whole is slipping into fascism and oligarchs are calling all the shots - and it's gotten bad enough we can't boycott or vote our way out, we have to start causing real pain to those above for any change to occur.”

love that

[reasonsforhope]

"The world's coral reefs are close to 25 percent larger than we thought. By using satellite images, machine learning and on-ground knowledge from a global network of people living and working on coral reefs, we found an extra 64,000 square kilometers (24,700 square miles) of coral reefs – an area the size of Ireland.

That brings the total size of the planet's shallow reefs (meaning 0-20 meters deep) to 348,000 square kilometers – the size of Germany. This figure represents whole coral reef ecosystems, ranging from sandy-bottomed lagoons with a little coral, to coral rubble flats, to living walls of coral.

Within this 348,000 km² of coral is 80,000 km² where there's a hard bottom – rocks rather than sand. These areas are likely to be home to significant amounts of coral – the places snorkelers and scuba divers most like to visit.

You might wonder why we're finding this out now. Didn't we already know where the world's reefs are?

Previously, we've had to pull data from many different sources, which made it harder to pin down the extent of coral reefs with certainty. But now we have high resolution satellite data covering the entire world – and are able to see reefs as deep as 30 meters down.

Pictured: Geomorphic mapping (left) compared to new reef extent (red shading, right image) in the northern Great Barrier Reef.

[AKA: All the stuff in red on that map is coral reef we did not realize existed!! Coral reefs cover so much more territory than we thought! And that's just one example. (From northern Queensland)]

We coupled this with direct observations and records of coral reefs from over 400 individuals and organizations in countries with coral reefs from all regions, such as the Maldives, Cuba, and Australia.

To produce the maps, we used machine learning techniques to chew through 100 trillion pixels from the Sentinel-2 and Planet Dove CubeSat satellites to make accurate predictions about where coral is – and is not. The team worked with almost 500 researchers and collaborators to make the maps.

The result: the world's first comprehensive map of coral reefs extent, and their composition, produced through the Allen Coral Atlas. [You can see the interactive maps yourself at the link!]

The maps are already proving their worth. Reef management agencies around the world are using them to plan and assess conservation work and threats to reefs."

-via ScienceDirect, February 15, 2024

[gideonisms]

I think we could all stand to unpack our feelings about societal standards of Intelligence and why it's important to us that someone else is less intelligent & capable

[doctorsiren]

Hatsune Miku being on the Coachella lineup for this year is amazing and great and so very silly but it’s so bad that tech bros are trying to spin it in favour of their “virtual AI influencers”

No. Like actually shut up?? Do you not know anything about Miku?? She is an art tool. She is a musical instrument. She isn’t being paraded around like she’s some sort of Metaverse influencer.

Stuff like that really grinds my gears. Do your research next time, hm? (looking at you specifically, Wendy Lee from the LA Times.)

[rhan-hastur]

Begging people to check the original poster whenever they're reblogging unsourced art, 99% of the time it's some shitty AI peddler that posts nothing but slop.

Please. For the sake of actual artists, be curious. Track down the source, and if you can't, at least wonder where the thing you're looking at is coming from, its purpose. Don't just mindlessly reblog anything you see.

[heilos]

I have come to the annoying conclusion that many search engines are becoming super useless in trying to track down historical research without bending over backwards for answers. The amount of garbage that shows up in the results is so incredibly aggravating and has nothing to do with my search terms or questions. I cannot in fact "just use X search engines" apparently.