#ai code analysis

[lazer-exe]

"spotify wrapped was clearly AI"

Two questions. What, exactly, do you think AI is? And did you think spotify had people HAND PICKING your top songs before this???? be for real

[manmishra]

🚀 The ChatGPT Desktop App is Changing the Game! 🤯💻 Imagine having an AI assistant that can: ✅ Reply to emails in seconds 📧⏩ ✅ Generate high-quality images with DALL-E 🎨🤩 ✅ Summarize long content instantly 📖📜 ✅ Write HTML/CSS code from screenshots 💻💡 ✅ Translate text across multiple languages 🌍🗣️ ✅ Extract text from images easily 📷📝 ✅ Analyze large datasets from Excel/CSV files 📊📈 👉 This app is designed to save your time. #ChatGPT #ChatGPTDesktopApp #AIProductivity #dalle #TechT

[industrynewsupdates]

A Comprehensive Overview of Generative AI In Coding Market Landscape

The global generative AI in coding market size is expected to reach USD 106.3 million by 2030, according to a new report by Grand View Research, Inc. The market is anticipated to expand at a CAGR of 25.2% from 2023 to 2030. Generative AI's impact on coding rapidly expands as developers use advanced models and successors to streamline software development. These models generate code snippets, offer creative solutions, automate documentation, enhance code comprehension, and enable rapid prototyping. As the technology evolves, its ability to address diverse programming languages and specific domains grows, empowering developers with efficient coding assistance and accelerating the iterative development process.

The rise in the development of AI models specifically designed for code generation propels the market forward. These models might be fine-tuned on programming languages, frameworks, and software development contexts, making their suggestions even more relevant and accurate. For instance, GitHub Copilot is an AI-driven coding tool that GitHub, OpenAI, and Microsoft Corporation developed. This tool offers code suggestions in Visual Studio, Neovim, and JetBrains development environments. Its ability to suggest relevant code snippets and auto-completion can save time and effort while improving code quality and consistency.

By integrating generative AI and low-code, systems can autonomously manage tasks, reducing human involvement. Low-code software democratizes development within organizations, while generative AI enhances efficiency. This synergy could streamline app creation in low-code and no-code platforms, where AI generates code from visual input. According to Microsoft's Low-Code Signals 2023 report, 87% of innovation leaders and IT professionals anticipate improved utilization through increased AI and automation within low-code platforms.

Gather more insights about the market drivers, restrains and growth of the Generative AI In Coding Market

Generative AI In Coding Market Report Highlights

• Code Generation segment dominated the market with a revenue share of 37.4% in 2022. As software development becomes more pervasive across industries, the demand for code is increasing. Generative AI assists in meeting this demand by accelerating code production.

• The North America region dominated the market with a revenue share of 29.3% in 2022. The interconnected tech ecosystem in North America encourages cross-industry collaboration and knowledge-sharing, further fueling the adoption of generative AI in coding.

• The collaboration among AI research, hardware progress, and vast datasets drives market by furnishing developers with more potent and streamlined tools. These tools simplify coding tasks, resulting in enhanced efficiency and the creation of superior software products.

• As artificial intelligence gains more recognition for its effectiveness across industries, there's a rising interest in utilizing generative AI for coding, driven by its potential to enhance coding processes. This interest stems from understanding AI's value in improving coding efficiency.

Generative AI In Coding Market Segmentation

Grand View Research has segmented the global generative AI in coding market based on operation, application, industry vertical and regional.

Generative AI in Coding Operation Outlook (Revenue, USD Million; 2018 - 2030)

• Code Generation

• Code Enhancement

• Language Translation

• Code Reviews

Generative AI in Coding Application Outlook (Revenue, USD Million; 2018 - 2030)

• Data Science and Analytics

• Game Development and Design

• Web and Application Development

• IoT and Smart Devices

Generative AI in Coding Industry Vertical Outlook (Revenue, USD Million; 2018 - 2030)

• BFSI

• Media and Entertainment

• IT & Telecom

• Healthcare and Life Sciences

• Transport & Logistics

• Retail & E-commerce

Generative AI in Coding Regional Outlook (Revenue, USD Million; 2018 - 2030)

• North America

o U.S.

o Canada

• Europe

o U.K.

o Germany

o France

• Asia Pacific

o China

o Japan

o India

o South Korea

o Australia

• Latin America

o Brazil

o Mexico

• Middle East and Africa

o KSA

o UAE

o South Africa

List of Key Players in the Generative AI In Coding Market

• Codecademy

• CodiumAI

• DeepCode

• Google LLC

• IBMCorporation

• Microsoft Corporation

• NVIDIA Corporation

• OpenAI

• Tabnine

• Codota

Order a free sample PDF of the Generative AI In Coding Market Intelligence Study, published by Grand View Research.

[ctrinity]

Exploring Claude AI's Key Features for Enhanced Productivity

Claude AI outlines its diverse capabilities aimed at various user groups, including writing, analysis, programming, education, and productivity. It supports long-form content creation, technical documentation, and data analysis....

Claude AI Outlines Capabilities for Diverse Users 🤖 AI assistants teaching Claude AI outlines its diverse capabilities aimed at various user groups, including writing, analysis, programming, education, and productivity. It supports long-form content creation, technical documentation, and data analysis, while also providing customized assistance for teachers, students, blog writers, and…

[dave2olkat]

I think now I know how those mad scientists in fiction that do all those horrible experiments for the sake of curiosity feel.

Because I am very curious about how AI would react to typing quirks.

Like, I am NOT going to feed anything to AI because fuck that but damn if I'm not curious over whenever it would get Vriska's quirk right or just implode and make the whole thing like if Sollux had written it.

I mean from someone who took like a year of classes to code AI in college you could train an AI to pick up on the quirk patterns to place for Vriska's quirk, though you would need to basically feed in every single pesterlog she has as well as some accurate logs from multiple fanfics for it to make a passable job and even then I imagined it'd fail to capture the emotional response adjacent 8s, theyd be seen as atypical data that would either mess everything up or they'd show up more than regular. So basically it cant be done but it won't be perfect and far more soulless in a way anyone familiar with the concept will notice which is what can be said about anything AI generated basically

[techtoio]

Exploring the Latest Trends in Software Development

Introduction The software is something like an industry whose development is ever-evolving with new technologies and changing market needs as the drivers. To this end, developers must keep abreast with current trends in their fields of operation to remain competitive and relevant. Read to continue .....

[newfangled-vady]

Business Intelligence- NewFangled Business Intelligence (BI) is a technology-driven approach to data analysis and reporting that empowers organizations to make informed, data-driven decisions. BI encompasses a wide range of tools, applications, and methodologies designed to collect, process, and transform raw data into valuable insights. By visualizing data through dashboards, reports, and interactive tools, BI enables stakeholders to better understand their operations, identify trends, and uncover opportunities or issues. This knowledge helps companies optimize their strategies, improve performance, and gain a competitive edge. BI tools often integrate with various data sources, providing a holistic view of an organization's data, and making it an invaluable asset for modern businesses.

[vlruso]

Use no-code machine learning to derive insights from product reviews using Amazon SageMaker Canvas sentiment analysis and text analysis models

Exciting news! 🎉 Want to use machine learning to gain insights from product reviews without any coding or ML expertise? Check out this step-by-step guide on how to leverage Amazon SageMaker Canvas sentiment analysis and text analysis models. 🤩 According to Gartner, 85% of software buyers trust online reviews as much as personal recommendations. With machine learning, you can analyze large volumes of customer reviews and uncover valuable insights to improve your products and services. 💡 Amazon SageMaker Canvas offers ready-to-use AI models for sentiment analysis and text analysis of product reviews, eliminating the need for ML specialists. In this blog post, we provide sample datasets and walk you through the process of leveraging these models. 📈 Elevate your company with AI and stay competitive. Don't miss out on this opportunity to derive insights from product reviews. Check out the blog post here: [Link](https://ift.tt/tRcfO83) Stay updated on AI and ML trends by following Itinai on Twitter @itinaicom. And for a free consultation, join our AI Lab in Telegram @aiscrumbot. 🚀 #AI #MachineLearning #AmazonSageMakerCanvas #ProductReviews #Insights List of Useful Links: AI Scrum Bot - ask about AI scrum and agile Our Telegram @itinai Twitter -  @itinaicom

[spreadsheetautomation]

3 Benefits of an AI Code Assistant

Artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized many industries in recent years. In the world of software development, it's helping professionals work faster and more accurately than ever before. AI-powered code assistants help developers write and review code.

The technology is versatile, generating code based on detailed codebase analysis. It can also detect errors, spot corruption and more. There are many benefits to using a code assistant. Here are some of the biggest.

More Productivity

What software professional doesn't wish they could work faster and more efficiently? With an AI code assistant, you can. These assistants can streamline your workflow in many ways.

One is by offering intelligent suggestions to generate new code for you. AI assistants do this by analyzing your codebase and learning its structure, syntax and semantics. From there, it can generate new code that complements and enhances your work.

Save Time

AI assistants can also automate the more repetitive side of software development, allowing you to focus on other tasks. Coding often requires you to spend far more time on monotonous work like compilation, formatting and writing standard boilerplate code. Instead of wasting valuable time doing those tasks, you can turn to your AI assistant.

It'll take care of the brunt of the work, allowing you to shift your focus on writing code that demands your attention.

Less Debugging

Because assistants are entirely AI-powered, the code they generate is cleaner. You don't have to worry about simple mistakes due to a lack of experience or the issue of human error.

But that's not all. AI assistants can also help with error detection as you work. They can spot common coding errors like syntax mistakes, type mismatches, etc. Assistants can alert you to or correct problems automatically without manual intervention. When it comes time to debug, you'll save hours of time thanks to the assistant's work.

Many developers are also using the technology for code refactoring. The AI will identify opportunities to improve the code, boosting its readability, performance and maintainability.

Read a similar article about enterprise Python integration here at this page.

[catboybiologist]

Many billionaires in tech bros warn about the dangerous of AI. It's pretty obviously not because of any legitimate concern that AI will take over. But why do they keep saying stuff like this then? Why do we keep on having this still fear of some kind of singularity style event that leads to machine takeover?

The possibility of a self-sufficient AI taking over in our lifetimes is... Basically nothing, if I'm being honest. I'm not an expert by any means, I've used ai powered tools in my biology research, and I'm somewhat familiar with both the limits and possibility of what current models have to offer.

I'm starting to think that the reason why billionaires in particular try to prop this fear up is because it distracts from the actual danger of ai: the fact that billionaires and tech mega corporations have access to data, processing power, and proprietary algorithms to manipulate information on mass and control the flow of human behavior. To an extent, AI models are a black box. But the companies making them still have control over what inputs they receive for training and analysis, what kind of outputs they generate, and what they have access to. They're still code. Just some of the logic is built on statistics from large datasets instead of being manually coded.

The more billionaires make AI fear seem like a science fiction concept related to conciousness, the more they can absolve themselves in the eyes of public from this. The sheer scale of the large model statistics they're using, as well as the scope of surveillance that led to this point, are plain to see, and I think that the companies responsible are trying to play a big distraction game.

Hell, we can see this in the very use of the term artificial intelligence. Obviously, what we call artificial intelligence is nothing like science fiction style AI. Terms like large statistics, large models, and hell, even just machine learning are far less hyperbolic about what these models are actually doing.

I don't know if your average Middle class tech bro is actively perpetuating this same thing consciously, but I think the reason why it's such an attractive idea for them is because it subtly inflates their ego. By treating AI as a mystical act of the creation, as trending towards sapience or consciousness, if modern AI is just the infant form of something grand, they get to feel more important about their role in the course of society. Admitting the actual use and the actual power of current artificial intelligence means admitting to themselves that they have been a tool of mega corporations and billionaires, and that they are not actually a major player in human evolution. None of us are, but it's tech bro arrogance that insists they must be.

Do most tech bros think this way? Not really. Most are just complict neolibs that don't think too hard about the consequences of their actions. But for the subset that do actually think this way, this arrogance is pretty core to their thinking.

Obviously this isn't really something I can prove, this is just my suspicion from interacting with a fair number of techbros and people outside of CS alike.

[industrynewsupdates]

A Comprehensive Overview of Generative AI In Coding Market Landscape

The global generative AI in coding market size is expected to reach USD 106.3 million by 2030, according to a new report by Grand View Research, Inc. The market is anticipated to expand at a CAGR of 25.2% from 2023 to 2030. Generative AI's impact on coding rapidly expands as developers use advanced models and successors to streamline software development. These models generate code snippets, offer creative solutions, automate documentation, enhance code comprehension, and enable rapid prototyping. As the technology evolves, its ability to address diverse programming languages and specific domains grows, empowering developers with efficient coding assistance and accelerating the iterative development process.

The rise in the development of AI models specifically designed for code generation propels the market forward. These models might be fine-tuned on programming languages, frameworks, and software development contexts, making their suggestions even more relevant and accurate. For instance, GitHub Copilot is an AI-driven coding tool that GitHub, OpenAI, and Microsoft Corporation developed. This tool offers code suggestions in Visual Studio, Neovim, and JetBrains development environments. Its ability to suggest relevant code snippets and auto-completion can save time and effort while improving code quality and consistency.

By integrating generative AI and low-code, systems can autonomously manage tasks, reducing human involvement. Low-code software democratizes development within organizations, while generative AI enhances efficiency. This synergy could streamline app creation in low-code and no-code platforms, where AI generates code from visual input. According to Microsoft's Low-Code Signals 2023 report, 87% of innovation leaders and IT professionals anticipate improved utilization through increased AI and automation within low-code platforms.

Gather more insights about the market drivers, restrains and growth of the Generative AI In Coding Market

Generative AI In Coding Market Report Highlights

• Code Generation segment dominated the market with a revenue share of 37.4% in 2022. As software development becomes more pervasive across industries, the demand for code is increasing. Generative AI assists in meeting this demand by accelerating code production.

• The North America region dominated the market with a revenue share of 29.3% in 2022. The interconnected tech ecosystem in North America encourages cross-industry collaboration and knowledge-sharing, further fueling the adoption of generative AI in coding.

• The collaboration among AI research, hardware progress, and vast datasets drives market by furnishing developers with more potent and streamlined tools. These tools simplify coding tasks, resulting in enhanced efficiency and the creation of superior software products.

• As artificial intelligence gains more recognition for its effectiveness across industries, there's a rising interest in utilizing generative AI for coding, driven by its potential to enhance coding processes. This interest stems from understanding AI's value in improving coding efficiency.

Generative AI In Coding Market Segmentation

Grand View Research has segmented the global generative AI in coding market based on operation, application, industry vertical and regional.

Generative AI in Coding Operation Outlook (Revenue, USD Million; 2018 - 2030)

• Code Generation

• Code Enhancement

• Language Translation

• Code Reviews

Generative AI in Coding Application Outlook (Revenue, USD Million; 2018 - 2030)

• Data Science and Analytics

• Game Development and Design

• Web and Application Development

• IoT and Smart Devices

Generative AI in Coding Industry Vertical Outlook (Revenue, USD Million; 2018 - 2030)

• BFSI

• Media and Entertainment

• IT & Telecom

• Healthcare and Life Sciences

• Transport & Logistics

• Retail & E-commerce

Generative AI in Coding Regional Outlook (Revenue, USD Million; 2018 - 2030)

• North America

o U.S.

o Canada

• Europe

o U.K.

o Germany

o France

• Asia Pacific

o China

o Japan

o India

o South Korea

o Australia

• Latin America

o Brazil

o Mexico

• Middle East and Africa

o KSA

o UAE

o South Africa

Order a free sample PDF of the Generative AI In Coding Market Intelligence Study, published by Grand View Research.

[crystal-wingeddragon-spikes]

My fan made Animation vs Coding part 2

Do you think stick figure AI would "assume" data type of all number to be float, double, or decimal?

...What? This is not a well-known fun fact outside STEM community?

So many people have this problem, someone made a whole webpage explaining it.

More organic explanation here; Defining a right data type is a big deal in programming. At least the programmer who manually assign it float/double would know why it went wrong.

JavaScript, however, will automatically assign an appropriate data type, and is advertised to be more beginner-friendly... Can you see why this became a meme?

0.1 and 0.2 will be considered double data type, which can't be accurate expressed in base 2.

There is only (1/2), (1/4), (1/8), ... ,(1/(2 power n)) in base 2.

It can't accurately express (1/10 and 2/10), but it still makes a very good approximation. That is why it is only 0.00000000000000004 off.

This is why in most statistic analysis and calculator use decimal data type. Or banking uses fixed-point numbers data. They both have their limitation; Decimal requires more computing power, which mean more specialized device. While fixed-point works fine with money because it's transferring money, not doing maths. It would never have to deal with 0.3333333... dollar.

Do you know what language is from the same family as JavaScript? That's right, it's Flash's programming language, ActionScript.

I told you my Computer Science grade was horrid, but this is very basic, so I am more confident explaining it.

[mostlysignssomeportents]

AI “art” and uncanniness

TOMORROW (May 14), I'm on a livecast about AI AND ENSHITTIFICATION with TIM O'REILLY; on TOMORROW (May 15), I'm in NORTH HOLLYWOOD for a screening of STEPHANIE KELTON'S FINDING THE MONEY; FRIDAY (May 17), I'm at the INTERNET ARCHIVE in SAN FRANCISCO to keynote the 10th anniversary of the AUTHORS ALLIANCE.

When it comes to AI art (or "art"), it's hard to find a nuanced position that respects creative workers' labor rights, free expression, copyright law's vital exceptions and limitations, and aesthetics.

I am, on balance, opposed to AI art, but there are some important caveats to that position. For starters, I think it's unequivocally wrong – as a matter of law – to say that scraping works and training a model with them infringes copyright. This isn't a moral position (I'll get to that in a second), but rather a technical one.

Break down the steps of training a model and it quickly becomes apparent why it's technically wrong to call this a copyright infringement. First, the act of making transient copies of works – even billions of works – is unequivocally fair use. Unless you think search engines and the Internet Archive shouldn't exist, then you should support scraping at scale:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/09/17/how-to-think-about-scraping/

And unless you think that Facebook should be allowed to use the law to block projects like Ad Observer, which gathers samples of paid political disinformation, then you should support scraping at scale, even when the site being scraped objects (at least sometimes):

https://pluralistic.net/2021/08/06/get-you-coming-and-going/#potemkin-research-program

After making transient copies of lots of works, the next step in AI training is to subject them to mathematical analysis. Again, this isn't a copyright violation.

Making quantitative observations about works is a longstanding, respected and important tool for criticism, analysis, archiving and new acts of creation. Measuring the steady contraction of the vocabulary in successive Agatha Christie novels turns out to offer a fascinating window into her dementia:

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2009/apr/03/agatha-christie-alzheimers-research

Programmatic analysis of scraped online speech is also critical to the burgeoning formal analyses of the language spoken by minorities, producing a vibrant account of the rigorous grammar of dialects that have long been dismissed as "slang":

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373950278_Lexicogrammatical_Analysis_on_African-American_Vernacular_English_Spoken_by_African-Amecian_You-Tubers

Since 1988, UCL Survey of English Language has maintained its "International Corpus of English," and scholars have plumbed its depth to draw important conclusions about the wide variety of Englishes spoken around the world, especially in postcolonial English-speaking countries:

https://www.ucl.ac.uk/english-usage/projects/ice.htm

The final step in training a model is publishing the conclusions of the quantitative analysis of the temporarily copied documents as software code. Code itself is a form of expressive speech – and that expressivity is key to the fight for privacy, because the fact that code is speech limits how governments can censor software:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/04/remembering-case-established-code-speech/

Are models infringing? Well, they certainly can be. In some cases, it's clear that models "memorized" some of the data in their training set, making the fair use, transient copy into an infringing, permanent one. That's generally considered to be the result of a programming error, and it could certainly be prevented (say, by comparing the model to the training data and removing any memorizations that appear).

Not every seeming act of memorization is a memorization, though. While specific models vary widely, the amount of data from each training item retained by the model is very small. For example, Midjourney retains about one byte of information from each image in its training data. If we're talking about a typical low-resolution web image of say, 300kb, that would be one three-hundred-thousandth (0.0000033%) of the original image.

Typically in copyright discussions, when one work contains 0.0000033% of another work, we don't even raise the question of fair use. Rather, we dismiss the use as de minimis (short for de minimis non curat lex or "The law does not concern itself with trifles"):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_minimis

Busting someone who takes 0.0000033% of your work for copyright infringement is like swearing out a trespassing complaint against someone because the edge of their shoe touched one blade of grass on your lawn.

But some works or elements of work appear many times online. For example, the Getty Images watermark appears on millions of similar images of people standing on red carpets and runways, so a model that takes even in infinitesimal sample of each one of those works might still end up being able to produce a whole, recognizable Getty Images watermark.

The same is true for wire-service articles or other widely syndicated texts: there might be dozens or even hundreds of copies of these works in training data, resulting in the memorization of long passages from them.

This might be infringing (we're getting into some gnarly, unprecedented territory here), but again, even if it is, it wouldn't be a big hardship for model makers to post-process their models by comparing them to the training set, deleting any inadvertent memorizations. Even if the resulting model had zero memorizations, this would do nothing to alleviate the (legitimate) concerns of creative workers about the creation and use of these models.

So here's the first nuance in the AI art debate: as a technical matter, training a model isn't a copyright infringement. Creative workers who hope that they can use copyright law to prevent AI from changing the creative labor market are likely to be very disappointed in court:

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/sarah-silverman-lawsuit-ai-meta-1235669403/

But copyright law isn't a fixed, eternal entity. We write new copyright laws all the time. If current copyright law doesn't prevent the creation of models, what about a future copyright law?

Well, sure, that's a possibility. The first thing to consider is the possible collateral damage of such a law. The legal space for scraping enables a wide range of scholarly, archival, organizational and critical purposes. We'd have to be very careful not to inadvertently ban, say, the scraping of a politician's campaign website, lest we enable liars to run for office and renege on their promises, while they insist that they never made those promises in the first place. We wouldn't want to abolish search engines, or stop creators from scraping their own work off sites that are going away or changing their terms of service.

Now, onto quantitative analysis: counting words and measuring pixels are not activities that you should need permission to perform, with or without a computer, even if the person whose words or pixels you're counting doesn't want you to. You should be able to look as hard as you want at the pixels in Kate Middleton's family photos, or track the rise and fall of the Oxford comma, and you shouldn't need anyone's permission to do so.

Finally, there's publishing the model. There are plenty of published mathematical analyses of large corpuses that are useful and unobjectionable. I love me a good Google n-gram:

https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=fantods%2C+heebie-jeebies&year_start=1800&year_end=2019&corpus=en-2019&smoothing=3

And large language models fill all kinds of important niches, like the Human Rights Data Analysis Group's LLM-based work helping the Innocence Project New Orleans' extract data from wrongful conviction case files:

https://hrdag.org/tech-notes/large-language-models-IPNO.html

So that's nuance number two: if we decide to make a new copyright law, we'll need to be very sure that we don't accidentally crush these beneficial activities that don't undermine artistic labor markets.

This brings me to the most important point: passing a new copyright law that requires permission to train an AI won't help creative workers get paid or protect our jobs.

Getty Images pays photographers the least it can get away with. Publishers contracts have transformed by inches into miles-long, ghastly rights grabs that take everything from writers, but still shifts legal risks onto them:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/06/19/reasonable-agreement/

Publishers like the New York Times bitterly oppose their writers' unions:

https://actionnetwork.org/letters/new-york-times-stop-union-busting

These large corporations already control the copyrights to gigantic amounts of training data, and they have means, motive and opportunity to license these works for training a model in order to pay us less, and they are engaged in this activity right now:

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/22/technology/apple-ai-news-publishers.html

Big games studios are already acting as though there was a copyright in training data, and requiring their voice actors to begin every recording session with words to the effect of, "I hereby grant permission to train an AI with my voice" and if you don't like it, you can hit the bricks:

https://www.vice.com/en/article/5d37za/voice-actors-sign-away-rights-to-artificial-intelligence

If you're a creative worker hoping to pay your bills, it doesn't matter whether your wages are eroded by a model produced without paying your employer for the right to do so, or whether your employer got to double dip by selling your work to an AI company to train a model, and then used that model to fire you or erode your wages:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/02/09/ai-monkeys-paw/#bullied-schoolkids

Individual creative workers rarely have any bargaining leverage over the corporations that license our copyrights. That's why copyright's 40-year expansion (in duration, scope, statutory damages) has resulted in larger, more profitable entertainment companies, and lower payments – in real terms and as a share of the income generated by their work – for creative workers.

As Rebecca Giblin and I write in our book Chokepoint Capitalism, giving creative workers more rights to bargain with against giant corporations that control access to our audiences is like giving your bullied schoolkid extra lunch money – it's just a roundabout way of transferring that money to the bullies:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/08/21/what-is-chokepoint-capitalism/

There's an historical precedent for this struggle – the fight over music sampling. 40 years ago, it wasn't clear whether sampling required a copyright license, and early hip-hop artists took samples without permission, the way a horn player might drop a couple bars of a well-known song into a solo.

Many artists were rightfully furious over this. The "heritage acts" (the music industry's euphemism for "Black people") who were most sampled had been given very bad deals and had seen very little of the fortunes generated by their creative labor. Many of them were desperately poor, despite having made millions for their labels. When other musicians started making money off that work, they got mad.

In the decades that followed, the system for sampling changed, partly through court cases and partly through the commercial terms set by the Big Three labels: Sony, Warner and Universal, who control 70% of all music recordings. Today, you generally can't sample without signing up to one of the Big Three (they are reluctant to deal with indies), and that means taking their standard deal, which is very bad, and also signs away your right to control your samples.

So a musician who wants to sample has to sign the bad terms offered by a Big Three label, and then hand $500 out of their advance to one of those Big Three labels for the sample license. That $500 typically doesn't go to another artist – it goes to the label, who share it around their executives and investors. This is a system that makes every artist poorer.

But it gets worse. Putting a price on samples changes the kind of music that can be economically viable. If you wanted to clear all the samples on an album like Public Enemy's "It Takes a Nation of Millions To Hold Us Back," or the Beastie Boys' "Paul's Boutique," you'd have to sell every CD for $150, just to break even:

https://memex.craphound.com/2011/07/08/creative-license-how-the-hell-did-sampling-get-so-screwed-up-and-what-the-hell-do-we-do-about-it/

Sampling licenses don't just make every artist financially worse off, they also prevent the creation of music of the sort that millions of people enjoy. But it gets even worse. Some older, sample-heavy music can't be cleared. Most of De La Soul's catalog wasn't available for 15 years, and even though some of their seminal music came back in March 2022, the band's frontman Trugoy the Dove didn't live to see it – he died in February 2022:

https://www.vulture.com/2023/02/de-la-soul-trugoy-the-dove-dead-at-54.html

This is the third nuance: even if we can craft a model-banning copyright system that doesn't catch a lot of dolphins in its tuna net, it could still make artists poorer off.

Back when sampling started, it wasn't clear whether it would ever be considered artistically important. Early sampling was crude and experimental. Musicians who trained for years to master an instrument were dismissive of the idea that clicking a mouse was "making music." Today, most of us don't question the idea that sampling can produce meaningful art – even musicians who believe in licensing samples.

Having lived through that era, I'm prepared to believe that maybe I'll look back on AI "art" and say, "damn, I can't believe I never thought that could be real art."

But I wouldn't give odds on it.

I don't like AI art. I find it anodyne, boring. As Henry Farrell writes, it's uncanny, and not in a good way:

https://www.programmablemutter.com/p/large-language-models-are-uncanny

Farrell likens the work produced by AIs to the movement of a Ouija board's planchette, something that "seems to have a life of its own, even though its motion is a collective side-effect of the motions of the people whose fingers lightly rest on top of it." This is "spooky-action-at-a-close-up," transforming "collective inputs … into apparently quite specific outputs that are not the intended creation of any conscious mind."

Look, art is irrational in the sense that it speaks to us at some non-rational, or sub-rational level. Caring about the tribulations of imaginary people or being fascinated by pictures of things that don't exist (or that aren't even recognizable) doesn't make any sense. There's a way in which all art is like an optical illusion for our cognition, an imaginary thing that captures us the way a real thing might.

But art is amazing. Making art and experiencing art makes us feel big, numinous, irreducible emotions. Making art keeps me sane. Experiencing art is a precondition for all the joy in my life. Having spent most of my life as a working artist, I've come to the conclusion that the reason for this is that art transmits an approximation of some big, numinous irreducible emotion from an artist's mind to our own. That's it: that's why art is amazing.

AI doesn't have a mind. It doesn't have an intention. The aesthetic choices made by AI aren't choices, they're averages. As Farrell writes, "LLM art sometimes seems to communicate a message, as art does, but it is unclear where that message comes from, or what it means. If it has any meaning at all, it is a meaning that does not stem from organizing intention" (emphasis mine).

Farrell cites Mark Fisher's The Weird and the Eerie, which defines "weird" in easy to understand terms ("that which does not belong") but really grapples with "eerie."

For Fisher, eeriness is "when there is something present where there should be nothing, or is there is nothing present when there should be something." AI art produces the seeming of intention without intending anything. It appears to be an agent, but it has no agency. It's eerie.

Fisher talks about capitalism as eerie. Capital is "conjured out of nothing" but "exerts more influence than any allegedly substantial entity." The "invisible hand" shapes our lives more than any person. The invisible hand is fucking eerie. Capitalism is a system in which insubstantial non-things – corporations – appear to act with intention, often at odds with the intentions of the human beings carrying out those actions.

So will AI art ever be art? I don't know. There's a long tradition of using random or irrational or impersonal inputs as the starting point for human acts of artistic creativity. Think of divination:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/07/31/divination/

Or Brian Eno's Oblique Strategies:

http://stoney.sb.org/eno/oblique.html

I love making my little collages for this blog, though I wouldn't call them important art. Nevertheless, piecing together bits of other peoples' work can make fantastic, important work of historical note:

https://www.johnheartfield.com/John-Heartfield-Exhibition/john-heartfield-art/famous-anti-fascist-art/heartfield-posters-aiz

Even though painstakingly cutting out tiny elements from others' images can be a meditative and educational experience, I don't think that using tiny scissors or the lasso tool is what defines the "art" in collage. If you can automate some of this process, it could still be art.

Here's what I do know. Creating an individual bargainable copyright over training will not improve the material conditions of artists' lives – all it will do is change the relative shares of the value we create, shifting some of that value from tech companies that hate us and want us to starve to entertainment companies that hate us and want us to starve.

As an artist, I'm foursquare against anything that stands in the way of making art. As an artistic worker, I'm entirely committed to things that help workers get a fair share of the money their work creates, feed their families and pay their rent.

I think today's AI art is bad, and I think tomorrow's AI art will probably be bad, but even if you disagree (with either proposition), I hope you'll agree that we should be focused on making sure art is legal to make and that artists get paid for it.

Just because copyright won't fix the creative labor market, it doesn't follow that nothing will. If we're worried about labor issues, we can look to labor law to improve our conditions. That's what the Hollywood writers did, in their groundbreaking 2023 strike:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/10/01/how-the-writers-guild-sunk-ais-ship/

Now, the writers had an advantage: they are able to engage in "sectoral bargaining," where a union bargains with all the major employers at once. That's illegal in nearly every other kind of labor market. But if we're willing to entertain the possibility of getting a new copyright law passed (that won't make artists better off), why not the possibility of passing a new labor law (that will)? Sure, our bosses won't lobby alongside of us for more labor protection, the way they would for more copyright (think for a moment about what that says about who benefits from copyright versus labor law expansion).

But all workers benefit from expanded labor protection. Rather than going to Congress alongside our bosses from the studios and labels and publishers to demand more copyright, we could go to Congress alongside every kind of worker, from fast-food cashiers to publishing assistants to truck drivers to demand the right to sectoral bargaining. That's a hell of a coalition.

And if we do want to tinker with copyright to change the way training works, let's look at collective licensing, which can't be bargained away, rather than individual rights that can be confiscated at the entrance to our publisher, label or studio's offices. These collective licenses have been a huge success in protecting creative workers:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/02/26/united-we-stand/

Then there's copyright's wildest wild card: The US Copyright Office has repeatedly stated that works made by AIs aren't eligible for copyright, which is the exclusive purview of works of human authorship. This has been affirmed by courts:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/08/20/everything-made-by-an-ai-is-in-the-public-domain/

Neither AI companies nor entertainment companies will pay creative workers if they don't have to. But for any company contemplating selling an AI-generated work, the fact that it is born in the public domain presents a substantial hurdle, because anyone else is free to take that work and sell it or give it away.

Whether or not AI "art" will ever be good art isn't what our bosses are thinking about when they pay for AI licenses: rather, they are calculating that they have so much market power that they can sell whatever slop the AI makes, and pay less for the AI license than they would make for a human artist's work. As is the case in every industry, AI can't do an artist's job, but an AI salesman can convince an artist's boss to fire the creative worker and replace them with AI:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/01/29/pay-no-attention/#to-the-little-man-behind-the-curtain

They don't care if it's slop – they just care about their bottom line. A studio executive who cancels a widely anticipated film prior to its release to get a tax-credit isn't thinking about artistic integrity. They care about one thing: money. The fact that AI works can be freely copied, sold or given away may not mean much to a creative worker who actually makes their own art, but I assure you, it's the only thing that matters to our bosses.

If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this post to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/05/13/spooky-action-at-a-close-up/#invisible-hand

[final-boy-creel]

hi so um, i am a little bit nervous to do this, but i think i can not stay in this fandom because of the way some people are behaving and i want to warn people about it… in the first day i made this account, 2 different people messaged me to warn me about a user named henrysglock and his friends and told me that they were doing bad things and that they are bad people

i am going to school for journalism next year and i am not new to fandom drama and callouts (and also i am a little bit nosy lol) so of course i wanted to do my own research, especially today when the internet is so full of lies and popularity contests and ai and fake news. so i looked on henrysglock’s page to read his posts and see what he was saying and i could not find any of the obvious proof that these people were talking about

i looked and looked, and they were sending me screenshots that a lot of the time looked like they were misinterpreting what was being said, or ignoring other posts that i saw where henrysglock said publicly that he did not like the things people were accusing him of liking. if you have not heard, these people were trying to convince me that henrysglock was a rape apologist and a pedophile because he talks about how henry and brenner have a weird dynamic in stranger things, and they also do not like that he talks about the weird things patty newby does in tfs

henrysglock talks a lot about analysis of stranger things and the show has always had a lot of sexual assault coding and sexual innuendos and stuff like that especially with stuff like the lab and henry in particular. all the way back in season 1 they were doing and saying things in the show that implied sexual things were happening to eleven in the lab (i think almost everyone who has seen stranger things has been shown the 3-legged brenner/papa drawing that was on eleven’s wall), and will was literally raped by the upside down and then the mind flayer in season 2, and henry as an orderly in season 4 has his long monologue about conformity and it is heavily implied that he was used to create the other lab children, some of them when he was still a teenager, which i don’t think i need to explain what that implies. however, that is all metaphors and symbolism. the sexual stuff did not actually happen, but implying it makes it easy to send the message that the lab is bad and dangerous for the people in it. it is about taking away their autonomy and being in control of them

the people who messaged me seemed to think that henrysglock talking about this stuff from the show meant he is supporting it, but he is just not shying away from talking about the gross things that the writers put into the show because it makes the show more interesting. i really enjoy how much the series uses subtext so i like that henrysglock is talking about it. a lot of the time when henrysglock talks about this stuff, he says how much he dislikes it or how uncomfortable it makes him. it makes me uncomfortable too, but it is still interesting to talk about. i do not like sanitizing my discussions about a messy show just because some people want to ignore it, and henrysglock seems to have that same idea

so all of these people are telling me these things about henrysglock, but i am not seeing any of it, so i messaged henrysglock myself to ask him what was going on and if he had more information (or if he would say something that would prove these people and their warnings right and i just could not find anything publicly). he was very nice and apologized that i was being bothered because of him, and he sent me links and screenshots of some old and new interactions with people who ended up being some of the people who were messaging me. i did not say anyone’s names (i will post screenshots for proof) henrysglock brought these people up by himself, and showed me that they were acting really really weird and obsessed with him and (in my opinion) deliberately misinterpreting the things he was saying on his page. he told me that this warning thing has happened to some of his other mutuals too so he was able to easily figure out who it was who was messaging me, even though i never confirmed it

to me, it feels like these people want to have a reason to dislike henrysglock that is more than just a difference in opinion. and they want to make him seem like a bad person so other people do not talk to him and instead become friends with their group. but that means that they are lying about henrysglock and his friends and blowing things way out of proportion, in my opinion, and tricking people into thinking they are right when they are not

i originally was not going to say anything publicly, because a couple people asked me not to, and i want to respect that, but i have learned some concerning things about at least one of the people who messaged me and i feel like i have to say something so that other people can draw their own conclusions and maybe try looking into these stories themselves instead of just blindly believing what they are told by someone else or being unfairly tricked

i was already confused because all of the “proof” i was being shown did not clearly say that henrysglock was any of the bad things they said, but they would not listen to me when i said it could be interpreted other ways or pointed out when he contradicted their idea of him. they kept trying to convince me that henrysglock was actually bad and kept trying to send me more proof, but it was all the same stuff that had other logical explanations

and then i was sent fake screenshots claiming to be private discord conversations from henrysglock and his friends. the person who sent them to me did not know they were fake though. i am not going to say who this person is because they seemed genuinely upset when i pointed out that they were fake, but that is what really made me start to wonder if everything being said was a big lie, and it made me suspicious of the people who were messaging me. misinterpreting what is being said is one thing, but these people were making up outright lies and fabricating evidence to act as “proof” for their drama, or at least spreading it around without actually looking at it closely first to make sure it was real

here are screenshots of my messages with this person and the fake screenshots they sent me. they contain transphobic messages claiming to have been sent by henrysglock and then is friend aemiron

i use discord a lot to talk to my friends, and as soon as i saw these, i thought that they looked sort of weird. i studied them and really tried to debunk if they were fake by opening my discord and comparing the layout. some of the formatting is a little bit weird to the naked eye, but there is obvious evidence that they are fake when you look at the text size of each message. in the same screenshot there are multiple different text sizes, like some messages are smaller than others. you can change text size in discord, but it does not make sense to do that in this context. also, henrysglock and his friends have posted screenshots of their discord chats publicly, and none of them ever looked like these. you can go on henrysglock’s page and look at them for yourself if you want, but here are links to some of his posts X X

they always have colors for their names, even in their really old messages, or they use fun fonts or silly nicknames. none of them have also ever used those icons

if that is not convincing though, just look at the messages in the second screenshot of discord. all of the messages are from july 2024, and then suddenly the last one is from january 2024. so unless time travel is real, then someone messed up when they were trying to frame henrysglock for being a bad person

and if you want even more proof, i told henrysglock about these, because it is obviously concerning and kind of scary that someone would spend the time doing this, and he is trans and even also uses neopronouns. i got his permission to share these because he has also posted them publicly on his tumblr. he also sent me a screenshot from one of his private chats with friends where he explained why he removed the neopronouns from his blog description, and then he still got picked on anyway

i was not going to name names, or even post anything publicly, but then the one really concerning person started to get kind of aggressive with me in our messages, started telling me outright lies and half truths, and then started making public posts about some of the situation. that person is elliot newbycomics who used to go by another username, i think elijbclawz like his instagram. i told him about the fake screenshots and he said he had never seen them before. however, it does not make sense for his friend to tell me his name unless it was true, or unless they are having a fight or something. the person who sent me the screenshots mentioned elliot by name before they even sent me the screenshots, so either elliot did actually send them, or this person is throwing elliot under the bus for no reason at all. i think we can agree that the latter does not make a lot of sense, and it is at least enough to make me suspicious of elliot and what else he might be lying about or who he is lying to. even if he did not make the screenshots, he may have been sending them around, which means he was still spreading outright lies about henrysglock

i will post some of my messages with elliot below, but i will explain it from the beginning first

i made my account on here last friday night (may 23) because i was tired of a lot of the drama i was seeing on instagram and tiktok in the stranger things fandom and i wanted to talk about tfs because i saw it as my high school graduation gift and loved it! when i woke up the next morning, i had messages from 3 people. one was the person who sent me the screenshots, who was very nice and just wanted to welcome me to the fandom and talk about tfs. the other 2 was another person and elliot

both of these people said they just wanted to warn me about henrysglock so i would not have to see the bad things he was posting. the first person was at least considerate enough to ask me first if i wanted to hear about it, but elliot immediately began talking about things without checking if i was prepared for it, which was fine in the end, but what if it had really upset me? and like i said, i decided to go looking on my own for the proof of what he was saying, and i did not find anything, so i said this to him because i was really confused about what he was saying

i told elliot i was a little confused and asked some more questions and said i thought maybe he was misinterpreting things and explained what they looked like to me, and then he replied with some more stuff but no actual proof or screenshots of any posts, just talking a lot about henry being 14 and brenner being 31 in tfs but ignoring where i said that henrysglock made them both adults and also henry is a 35ish year old adult in the show

i will admit that when i replied the second time it was really long and rambley because i was very confused and felt like i was being lied to by the other person i was talking to. they told me that there was rape in henrysglocks henry and brenner fic on ao3, but i read it and that is not true at all. they are adults the entire time, they do not meet until henry is over 21, and it is a modern au where the lab does not exist and brenner is just a regular psychologist, and everything is consensual the whole time. i am fine with people not liking henry and brenner as a couple (i do not really like it either), but i am not fine with people lying and saying henrysglock is a pedophile and rape apologist and abuse apologist when he never supports those things and has no evidence of ever talking about it like it is good or okay

if you read any of henrysglock's analysis posts, or even just his really long one on ao3 here X he says many times that he does not like what is going on between henry and brenner. just because he is talking about it, it does not automatically mean he thinks it is good like these people were trying to tell me

so i sent elliot my long messages, including mentioning the fake screenshots, how other people were making me uncomfortable, and that i was really confused because it felt like i was being lied to, but i did not want to break my promise and talk about it publicly, but he was the only other person who had messaged me so i thought it would be safe to talk to him and he would help clear things up. but when he replied, it felt like he did not read my messages at all. he didn’t acknowledge anything except for saying that he would find more evidence of henrysglock saying bad things. i had to ask him again about the screenshots and he said “what screenshots” like i hadn’t just sent a whole message about them, which i thought was really rude and disrespectful when he had started this conversation with me and dragged me into the drama

he said he had never seen them, which i would have accepted, because it would still mean that someone out there was lying about henrysglock, and i was ready to move on from elliot or try asking the other person again if they were sure they got the screenshots from elliot (they could not show me proof because they said that elliot deleted the messages with the screenshots, which is suspicious in my opinion as well), but then elliot said some things that did not make sense or that were untrue. he said that he had never talked to henrysglock on discord, but that is not what i said. i said that he had allegedly had screenshots of henrysglock’s private chats and he would not even need discord in order to get them. he then said that he doesn’t even use discord, but later i learned this was not entirely true. i decided to look at his instagram because maybe i could join the smaller tfs fandom there because he said they were all cool on there unlike my experience with the whole stranger things fandom. and so when i was looking at his account, i saw some posts from him that showed screenshots of him in discord from may

i was confused and upset and asked why he lied to me, and he said that he technically did have a discord but just did not use it very much. but in his initial message he implied that he did not use discord at all, so i told him it was suspicious that he did not say that clearly the first time, and he seemed surprised why i would think that is suspicious, even though it is obvious, especially on top of all the other exaggerations and lies. it felt like he was just trying to backpedal and act like he was the victim

when i said that this behavior was weird and scary, he became condescending to me and asked why i was scared because it was “just people on the internet” but if it was just people on the internet then why was he trying so hard to convince me that henrysglock was a bad person? he is contradicting himself and it is suspicious and it makes me not trust that he is being truthful or actually kind

he also said many times that this was just a warning and i can do whatever i want with the information, but he kept trying to convince me really hard that henrysglock was a bad person and kept saying he would get more posts when he could have just moved on himself. he became very annoyed that i kept asking questions and that i had turned it into a “debate” when all i was doing was trying to understand and figure out what was really going on and why he did not like henrysglock because i could not find anything he was talking about and he just kept saying the same things over and over that were lies or exaggerations, so of course he did not convince me

i also just started to get really worried about henrysglock and his friends, because i saw on henrysglock’s page that one of his mutuals deleted their account because they kept getting harassed by people in this group who hates henrysglock and i was mutuals with her too so i came back to her account deleted and learned what happened. that made me really upset and so i wanted to try and get elliot to see where i was coming from and try to see my point of view, but he is very stubborn and does not want to listen to any evidence or other opinions

elliot then sent me screenshots of one of henrysglock’s other fan fictions, i think trying to claim it was a sexual scene between henry and brenner when henry was 12. but i read that fic too, and it is a canon divergent fic about mr clarke and henry and that scene was specifically a negative flashback to henry’s time in the lab when he was 12. the fic is very much like canon just if henry had escaped when he was a teenager and this flashback scene is almost exactly like the flashbacks eleven has of the lab when she is being dragged away by guards and yelling papa over her shoulder before getting punished, and it is very similar to the way brenner cradles eleven’s face in his hands in a way that is very uncomfortable. i guess elliot was trying to say that henrysglock’s fic was romanticizing it or something but it is literally just like a scene from the actual show, so i did not see the problem with it, and i did not appreciate elliot trying to twist the truth to fit his incorrect idea

when i said this to him he got a little bit snippy with me and asked why i was so adamant about defending henrysglock, but i do not think i have to keep explaining that i don’t like people who lie and slander people for made up reasons. he then said that he did not want to talk about it anymore and i can do whatever i want with this information, but to please stop messaging him because he said i made him uncomfortable by “stalking” his instagram, which i explained to him was not what i was doing like i explained earlier above. it is especially funny that he said i was stalking his page when henrysglock showed me evidence of elliot block evading or getting his friends to block evade for him to take screenshots of henrysglock’s posts and post them on his own account X. elliot is clearly projecting, but i did not say that to him. i said i was sorry and that i was just still confused but i would leave him alone if that is what he wanted. i even unfollowed him so i would not interact with him at all and make him uncomfortable

then a little bit later he messaged me again asking why i thought it was okay to ship henry and brenner. i replied that i already answered that in our conversation and i was not going to get into it again because he had asked me to stop talking to him and i wanted to respect that. he then said that he was going to interpret that as me shipping them and sarcastically said thanks. i then sent him a screenshot of the very first reply i sent him where i said i do not like brenner ships and that now i was going to block him because i do not like that he is lying and making things up about me too and not listening to what i am saying, and i blocked him

this behavior was very weird and unsavory and mean, in my opinion. this elliot person does not seem like a good person and i think that people need to be careful when interacting with him. he seems very entitled i think because he is a somewhat popular account and gets upset when people do not agree with him completely, even if he says he does not care. so if he is going around warning people about henrysglock and making up lies, then i think i am allowed to make a post warning people who already know him and new fans to maybe be careful and think about the things he has said critically and do research yourself, because again and again he has been lying to me, trying to trick me, and misinterpreting things and refusing to see any other argument than his own

now i also want to talk about that other person who i mentioned. this person i am a little hesitant to say the name of, but they seem like they are not a nice person and they are spreading a lot of negative things about henrysglock as well that are wrong, and based on my research, i think they were the first person to start looking at henrysglock’s fan fiction to try and tear him down. that is imanopossum

they messaged me first just asking if i was aware of henrysglock and if i wanted to know about what he has said and done. they then said a lot of stuff that was similar to elliot, so i did not really believe it/i was confused why they were making it such a big deal, and i tried discussing that with them. we then talked about tfs for a little while where they told me that things were different in their viewing of it (patty did not push henry down in the stage accident scene, henry apparently agreed to kiss her in the school play rehearsal, etc.) which was confusing to me because when i saw it, henry seemed uncomfortable during that scene and patty was definitely scared of him at the end of the play, and henrysglock has posted screenshots and videos of the west end show where both of those things happen too. they did not really have a response for me when i said that broadway and west end both had these elements

this was a red flag to me because it felt like they were not willing to see another point of view without arguing. i told them that this feels like it is up to different interpretations and decided to move on, because while i thought that patty’s behavior was weird sometimes, others might not, and that is kind of the whole point of why she was written that way. they seemed to appreciate that i said that, but i thought it was interesting that i had to say it first and they just kept trying to argue with me until i ended it

so then i talked to henrysglock, like i said, and he told me about some interactions with this person that he had in the past. the main one is these posts here X X X but i could not find the original posts involved by imanopossum because i think they might have deleted them, which is a little bit suspicious and concerning like they are trying to make it seem like henrysglock bothered them out of nowhere. especially too because when it started, henrysglock blocked imanopossum so that he would not have to talk to them, and imanopossum decided to mock him for it instead of being a mature person and moving on. imanopossum then went out of their way to read a fic they knew they would not like and then posted a critique about it, only to get upset when henrysglock rightfully posted a response to it once he was made aware of it

imanopossum grossly misunderstood henrysglock’s fic and has decided to spread lies about it. they were the one who started saying that it was a rape fic with henry as a child, but that is not true. like i said before, the fic is a modern au where they both meet as adults and henry is over 21 and brenner is in his 30s, and it is fully consensual the whole time and the lab doesn’t exist and brenner is a normal guy

imanopossum also claimed that the fic was transphobic because henrysglock was allegedly fetishizing being trans and using it for the kink involved in the fic. henrysglock is trans himself, like i said before, and i am also trans, and i did not see any issue with the way he wrote the fic. it felt very real and it was not fetishy at all. is it so bad that a trans person think they are attractive in being trans? do you think being trans is so gross that no one is allowed to think it is an attractive trait? because that is what it sounds like to me

they also said a really weird thing about the sex being “physically heterosexual” which is… a crazy thing to say to a trans person about a trans guy having sex with another man. and apparently they did not see anything wrong with saying that, so i don’t know. it made me really uncomfortable to know that this person thinks that way about trans people and thinks that making henry trans was a random decision for no reason. when i read the fic, it was very obvious to me that henry being trans was the replacement for his powers. for this au, instead of having powers, being trans is what made him different and an outcast. it was a very easy to understand swap, so i do not get why imanopossum had such an issue with it. it makes me think they are being purposefully obtuse and stubborn because they do not want to just admit that they are wrong and move on

it was also especially weird when they said that henrysglock should just write a henry and patty fic instead of a brenner and henry fic if he is going to make it “physically heterosexual” anyway… are you asking henrysglock to write porn of henry and patty when the only interactions they have had together is when they are 14 years old? i think that is actually what is weird in this situation

a lot of my interactions with these people has made me feel like these are people who either have not seen the actual tv show stranger things, or do not care about it as much, and think that tfs is the only thing that matters and is the true canon story. the creators have said that tfs is canon, but you have to be deliberately ignoring all of the wrong details in order to think this is how everything actually went for henry. when i saw tfs, especially after the end when we see eleven in the lab, it made me wonder if something like nina in season 4 was happening. maybe not exactly that, but it being a vision or something because of how it does not actually match up with the original show in a lot of ways. but i know the writers are good writers and they are not just mistakes because they are way too obvious if you just pay attention. louis mccartney said himself that there are weird things happening in tfs and said we just have to think about it a little bit and it will make sense

the tv show was here first, and it is the more important part of the story, and when henrysglock talks about brenner and henry in any sort of adult way, they are always their adult versions played by jamie campbell bower and matthew modine. and if anyone tells me that he actually talks about it with tfs henry and brenner, i would like to reiterate what i said before about how a lot of the time that is just talking about analysis and what is actually in the show and how stranger things is full of a lot of sexual stuff and metaphors, and also making jokes about it is an easy way to make a hard conversation more easy

i personally can see where these people are getting these ideas about henrysglock, but they have wildly exaggerated them until they are entirely untrue statements. they are allowed to not like what henrysglock is doing and they do not have to agree with it, but that does not give them a pass to harass people and accuse them of really serious things while they are entirely untrue if you just think about it for a little bit

i am also just concerned about these people’s decision to message me about this. i just think that is a weird thing to do and i find it really weird that they have been doing it to other people too. also that i and other people have gotten anonymous messages in our inboxes about it as well, which is just cowardly and embarrassing in my opinion. if you are going to slander people, at least say it with your account attached

elliot was very upset that it turned into a big thing with me, but it could have been avoided if he had just left me alone and let me make my own decisions. same with the other people who messaged me. it is really unnecessary and it made this time joining the fandom needlessly stressful and annoying and frustrating. i understand why they feel like they want to do it, and i appreciate it to a degree, but it is only good if the person they are warning about is actually a bad person, and in hindsight it just comes off as a little bit patronizing like they think i am a stupid kid who can’t think critically and make my own decisions and come to my own conclusions

they are being manipulative, controlling, and threatening even if they say they are not. it is very clear to me that even if they say they are letting you do whatever you want with their information, they or people associated with them will harass you until you delete your account and leave the website. and it affects henrysglock and his friends as well because they don’t want people to get harassed because of them. and all of that feels like it is an abuse tactic called triangulation where someone brings in a third person to strengthen their argument and make it a two against one fight against the other person. it is cruel and unfair and the lies just make it worse

i’m getting a little bit dramatic because this is making me so frustrated. as someone who wants to be a journalist, i find it disgraceful that people are spreading lies like this because someone does not like their ship and instead ships something else. do you not feel ashamed and embarrassed for making such a big deal out of fictional ships? you are going out of your way to tell lies to other people in order to push your narrative when you should just be blocking henrysglock and his friends and pretending they do not exist

i do not want to be in the fandom on here if there are going to be people playing popularity contests like children and lying in order to make themselves look good. you are not righteous, you are bullies, and you should be ashamed

i want to warn anyone who is friends with elliot or imanoppossum or anyone in their group to be careful of everyone there, because it seems the whole group is based on lies and negativity instead of fandom and collaboration. all i wanted to do was talk about the show, but all these people want to talk about is the other people in the fandom who they hate, which is embarrassing for them

this is going to be my last post and then i am going to abandon this account. i am not going to delete it because i might want to come back for season 5 if all of these weird people are gone or promise to stop bothering everyone with their lies and tricks. i will not log back into this account, so if you send me a message i will not see it until i maybe log back in the future

if anyone is willing to listen, i think you should read some of henrysglock’s analysis posts about the show, especially that really big one on his ao3 i linked earlier but i will put it here again X because it is really good and interesting. if you are afraid he is going to be mean to patty, he’s not, he is very nice to her. if you think he is going to be only nice to brenner, he is not, he is very critical of him. because of everything that i was being told about him, i was a little bit nervous going into reading such a big analysis like that, but he was much nicer than i was led to believe. i think a lot of people have just been scared out of talking about the deeper meaning of the show, and it is worth it to think for yourself and make your own decisions instead of blindly believing what other people tell you

thank you to the people who were nice to me, i am sorry i could not stay longer to get to know you better and talk about my favorite tv show with you

goodbye and have a good day