Text
i had the most interesting cinematic experience today
#been getting really into slashers recently and its been enlightening#had one that was pretty fun but lost momentum fast cos it couldnt decide between camp and serious#then the next one i watched was one i found while searching for another one in the same series#the second one was from a different series with a similar villain#and 4 minutes in it slapped me with being some bizarre concoction that can only be described as#a dailywire adjacent movie made by the most unfunny director possible#it was a ''horror'' ''comedy''#the kind of thing that is written by one guy and is just a vehicle for the most inane takes#embodied all the worst parts of horror fans like the people who like things simply cos theyre offensive#as if being a mean bigot who revels in edginess is badass and subversive#started watching ghoulies again as a palate cleanser but at that point i was sleepy#ghoulies is a really fun one#everyone go watch ghoulies#and beware of two specific slasher series that feature a villain in a bunny suit#the first 10 minutes of bunnyman massacre are so fun but then it slows down#tried to find bunnyman 1 and ran into serial rabbit#serial rabbit is not good
1 note
·
View note
Text
I love lingering when it comes to introducing oc story and lore because ohh oh ohhhhh it’s fun seeing reactions to plot points and discussing them and what not. But it’s also scary because I won’t like it if I’m judged for a story direction because people don’t like a character or smth. But also who caresssss I call it a jumpscare to see horrible people fully comprehend that they’re horrible and try to fix themselves and build themself from the ground up. I call it that fucked up people can realize their wrongs and change themselves for the better. I call it nuance. I call it look at these ocs boy
#I say this specifically because I have plots that I cannot share right now because the haters will sabotage /J#no but forreal listen to me#imagine you’re a piece of shit. and it’s largely because your parents installed their pompous and bigoted views onto you#and from day one you seemed to be the favorite child. your parents adored you. your parents insisted you’d go far.#they acted as if you acted just like them then you’d succeed. and you were succeeding. no one worth your time treated you badly#even though you treat most people badly. INCLUDING your own siblings. if anything you’re encouraged to treat your siblings like ass#so they strive for greatness. but you refuse to see them as anything but great. because THEYRE not YOU. they’re nothing like you#you’re special. you’re perfect. you deserve so much in life and you will go so far in life because of your parents#but then you follow your heart. you were given freedom in life so why not decide to try and date people not on your level#but your parents HATE this!! and when you get your heart broken they refuse to comfort you#they demean you. insult your intelligence. ask where they went wrong raising you. treat you like they treat your siblings.#You did nothing wrong objectively. you just did what you wanted which you had always done! but now it’s wrong!#and you realize... your siblings and other family members also weren’t doing anything wrong. we’re they?#because if this is enough to make your parents treat you like dirt underneath your feet then what did your siblings truly do wrong#are they truly different from you? we’re they truly worthless and deserved to be mistreated?#were you wrong this whole time?#Yes. You were. You fucking sucked!!!! you were horrible for no reason!!!!!!!#So how do you go about trying to make amends? to righting your wrongs?#when you only realized your mistakes through selfishness? because you only realized this when YOU finally got treated like shit?#oh yknow. fuck around and find out I guess
1 note
·
View note
Note
sorry to ramble in your inbox but its kinda fucking me up how "trans man with a cishet boyfriend who misgenders him behind his back" is like seen to be a person to make fun of in the general queer tumblr space instead of a person who is in a vulnerable situation. i know that there is trans men who are also women and there are trans men who are genuinely okay with dating a cis man who considers himself straight but people talking about these hypothetical couples arent talking about these situations but rather about "haha stupid trans man doesnt realize hes dating a bigot"
theres this attitude that the hypothetical cishet boyfriend is actually a conservative so it should be obvious to trans man that he doesnt respect his identity but i feel like its less "oh its obvious that this specific man is a bigot" and more "obviously cishet white men are bigots" and its weird how people laugh at this person instead of acknowledging that even if you are dating a bigot its usually not a big win for you personally. like the bigot cishet boyfriend isnt going to be okay with his trans man boyfriend starting testosterone. like we can sympathize with emotional abuse happening towards other groups but when its gay and mspec trans men its like "oh he should have known that would happen" or "its his fault for dating a bigot"?
of course people have the same making fun of the victim narrative with afab nonbinary people who date cishet men who misgender them [and im sure this bleeds over to affecting all nonbinary people if people arbitrarily decide theyre afab if the nonbinary person refuses to tell them personal information about themselves but the larger narrative always specifies that this is an afab person] and its almost like a "this is what you get for being attracted to men" sort of thing.
and also i theres something to be said about warning people for signs their partner or potential partner doesnt respect their identity but considering i imagine its a common anxiety among trans and nonbinary people who are into that sorta thing to wonder "am i ever going to find someone who loves me and is also accepting of me for being [insert gender here]?" its sort of fucked up for it to be common to basically claim "yea if youre dating a cis man who said he was straight before he started dating you but says he respects your identity hes probably just straight up lying to your face" and then laugh at the person getting misgendered for not knowing they were being misgendered.
anyway sorry for this big ramble i cant even remember specific instances of this to reference so i might seem like im making up a guy to be mad at but i swear this is like a general attitude and almost running joke i see around. anyway. have a good day.
I absolutely see that too, and I think it's a mixture of straight up victim blaming, because oh noo how dare you WANT to date *gasp* cis men
but it come with an intense transandrophobia and exorsexism because there's a lot more sympathy when it comes to cis women dating cishet men "poor things uwu" but when it's trans men or in this case non binary people assumed to be women, it's always "see I told you so" smug superiority. (cis women get this too, because of misogyny obviously, but it's different and worse for trans men) People are just waiting for a chance to be misogynistic and trans men are an acceptable target. This is honestly extra fucked up when we remember that trans men experience some of the highest rates of domestic violence and rape in the community though.
being trans is such a vulnerable place to be in, and a lot of people, trans or not are insecure or just want to be loved, that's normal. A lot of people are willing to accept certain behaviors from their partners that are bad, because of those reasons as well, victim blaming, and ESPECIALLy telling trans men to toughen up or "what did you expect" is apart of the toxic expectations that get placed of trans men as well. I could honestly go on for hours about this. good ask,anon
812 notes
·
View notes
Text
Let's talk about Bishop from TOTTMNT
(Tw sibling death)
@hahachiknfunny
Ok. I'm going to just get this out of the way at the beginning.
I HATE THIS CHARACTER
And not in a "aaa this villain makes me so mad bc they're evil" no I mean I hate the way her character is developed and justified.
IF YOU DISAGREE PLEASE DO EXPLAIN I WOULD QUITE GENUINLY LOVE TO HEAR ABOUT IT!!!
So I am still working my way through a lot of different tmnt series (currently alternating between 2012 and 2003), so I don't have a lot of experience with the usual Bishop character. Based on the little I know about him (mostly from fanfiction), my general impression was that he was this bigoted white guy who was like. A mutant nazi or something. He hates mutants because they are different, they are "flawed", and therefore they are a threat. I figured he was just a hateful asshole, and hadn't thought about it more then that.
But for this, they decided to go in a different direction. The ✨tragic backstory✨ direction. Which is a pretty good direction! IF you do it right. Which, in my humble opinion, THEY ABSOLUTELY DID NOT!!!!
Ok let's get some actual points here!
When we get Josefina Bishop's backstory, she starts as this passionate, nice character who is eager to achieve her robot building dreams. Nothing about her is mean or hating or anything of the sort. She is exasperated by Rod, but doesn't say anything incredibly bitter to him, she's just frustrated being forced to work with this rich guys man child. Which yeah! Thats fair! She has a sister who died and who is the inspiration of her work. Awesome!
And then her workshop is destroyed.
Let me just add. She is being funded by a millionaire. She probably has insurance! Her sister is in no way harmed by these events. And yet her response to property damage is DOMESTIC FUCKING TERRORISM.
She immediately gets bitter and revenge-filled, deciding that she should exterminate ALL THE MUTANTS!!!
You know, the mutants that were helping fight Superfly? The enemies of the one who destroyed her work? THEYRE LITERALLY ON HER SIDE???
And not only does this hatred of Superfly extend to the turtles.
SHE ALMOST KILLS A SUBWAY TRAIN FULL OF PEOPLE!!!
Because, of course "iTs A sMaLL pRicE tO PaYyYyyy"
Bestie. Honey. Girlfriend.
Its just. Weird to me? It doesn't seem very thought out. I would have loved a kind of change up from the usual Bishop themes, but just because its different and new isn't an excuse for it to suck!
IT TOTALLY COULD HAVE WORKED AND HERE IS HOW.
Nickelodeon needs to stop being a bitch and kill off her sister during the Superfly conflict.
Its very clearly what they WANTED to do. Its like the original concept was that her sister died, but that was considered too violent, so they took that out, but then didn't replace it with something else. And they tried so hard to be like "ohhh its about my sisterrrr" GIRL WHAT THIS IS ABOUT SUPERFLY DESTROYING YOUR SHIT AND YOU BEING BUTT HURT ABOUT IT.
And another thing! For a character to turn evil, they have to SNAP! And a character can't snap unless they are already under enough pressure to make that a threat.
Make her be cruel to Rod. Have her be control freak who has to have all the variables perfectly in place. Bitter about the sponsors that doubted and rejected her. Make her already angry at the world, have the only thing that matters to her be her robots and her sister, the two things that were always at her side. And then one day Superfly kills her sister and destroys her lifes work. Yes, she can rebuild the robots. Not the sister though, and making them without her is such an empty and performative motion.
Mutants have gotten people killed. They're too dangerous, its too much of a risk.
This mindset would make so much more sense if they just HAD SUPERFLY KILL HER SISTER LIKE OMG.
Also she had several direct conversations with the turtles, so she was well aware they were intelligent beings.
ALSO! She didn't target the mutants who used to work with Superfly. That would TOTALLY make sense even without the sister thing!
But no. She had to kill the TURTLES. The ones who are widely acknowledged and widely known to be the ones to stop Superfly and save NYC and the world.
But you know what? Maybe i could let that go. Its a kids show, right? And I did like her recovery arc at the end.
Until they. You know. COMPLETELY UN DID ALL OF THAT!!!!
I thought that maybe Bishop will be like. Idk a spy for the mutants or something, like a double agent, but tbh based on the previous writing of her character, I wouldn't put it past the writers to just. Have her do a complete 180. I'm just mad she's going to be a reoccurring character.
Anyway. I kinda hate to dump on this show so much bc I love (most) everything else about it. Bishop was the lowest point to me by far.
#a lot of this is just#an angry rant#tottmnt#tmnt#tales of the tmnt#tales of the teenage mutant ninja turtles#teenage mutant ninja turtles#bishop#tmnt bishop#tottmnt bishop#josefina bishop
49 notes
·
View notes
Text
one of the absolutely most frustrating things in the western leftist attitude towards "zionism" is that they use zionism to describe something that has its own word. kahanism. but instead they choose to go through hoops to redefine a belief system that ISNT theirs to define. words change overtime, but westerners and goyim dont get to decide what a word that is culturally significant to jews means. and just because the tiny fraction of jews that are antizionist allow you to decide doesnt mean that the wider jewish community who are zionists agree with that.
lets also get one thing clear: zionism is an ancient jewish value. throughout the jewish peoples time in exile away from the land of israel, there was always a strong desire to return to zion, which refers to yerushalayim or the land of israel as a whole. just because someone jew in America might tell you "well i feel no connection to israel" DOESNT MEAN THAT EVERY JEW AGREES.
zionism is the belief that the jewish people deserve self determination in our ancient ancestral land, which encompasses the kingdom of israel and judah. that what it is at its very core. in modern definitions its the idea that the state of israel deserves to continue existing.
ive seen antizionists define zionism as "facism" just a Different ideology, or something along the lines of "kill palestinians" and "take over the world" no where in zionist belief do we think that jews must take over the world, or that palestinians must die for jews to live. or that the modern state of israel must be an exclusively jewish state. the founders of israel picked sovereignty snd safety over maximalism, meaning they chose to settle for the land given in the agreements ALTHOUGH a lot of the land that has our ancient history wasnt actually in our defined land which remains as such to this day.
now, kahanism. kahanism is in my eyes an appropriation of what zionism is. kahanism is an extreme right wing and racist take/"branch" of zionism. the idea that israel must be exclusively jewish, no arabs no muslims no christians, and many kahanists like ben gvir even believe that israel should reoccupy the gaza strip. kahanism ( the kach party) was banned from the knesset, israels parliament. but i think its with this move that our rotten politicians did to circumvent this ban is what has really fucked the perception of israel and zionism beyond repair alongside the propaganda about what zionism is. kahanists have essentially decided that kahanism is actually what truly zionist belief is, so they decide to call their movement a Zionist movement. so the "oztma yehudit" (jewish power, disgusting of them to call themselves this btw 😀😀) party peddles the idea that theyre a zionist movement when really, they are just kahanist and anti arab and anti palestinian. its not fucking "jewish power" to be racist. its maddening to me how many "zionists" are actually racist and bigoted and kahanist and then a lot of antizionists see them and say "look at so so, they say theyre zionist and theyre actually racist bigots who want to flatten gaza, every zionist believes that" and when you believe in palestinian self determination and the continued existence of israel and are thus a zionist, youre now morally wrong and inferior, when the perception of zionism is so beyond warped from its true definition. and as much as people will say "not all jews are zionists!" and "im not antisemetic im jusy antizionist!" its very clear how this has given a lot of closeted jew haters the chance to spew blood libel and misinformation. i do believe that there are well intentioned people in the anti israel/anti zionist/pro palestine movement. i truly truly want to believe that. and if you got this far and consider yourself pro palestine, look left snd right in your movement. learn about the old blood libel thst was used against jews for thousands of years thst is now beinh rehashed with more palatable language. there is a LOT of antisemitism in the palestinian movement, and if people who are truly not jew haters have to stand up for what is right to wash the movement clean of antisemitic libel and violence.
i couldnt find a place to fit this in the previous paragraph but israelis are constantly fighting bibis coalition, most israelis crave nothing more then our hostages back and bibi out of politics. our government has done literally nothing to actually help us for a long fucking time. it is incompetent snd we are in dire need to a better prime minister. im thinking of doing a post about how israeli elections, coalitions, parties and knesset works plus an overview of the parties and their ideologies at some point, so lmk if youd be interested
so, pro palestinian and dont hate jews or israelis? actually want to stand for peace?? seriously, put in the effort. because we cannot see you. you are overshadowed by people using the movement to be antisemitic and spread lies about the jewish people.
#ישראבלר#jewish#jumblr#טא��בלר ישראלי#ישראלים#judaism#יהדות#israel#israeli politics#zionism#antisemitism#leftist antisemitism#i/p#i/p conflict
54 notes
·
View notes
Note
in what universe is someone going to see a DNI that applies to them and think "this person is definitely someone im going to enjoy following and get along with". do you go on twitter and see nazis saying they hate trans people and decide to follow them out of spite? of course not, and literally nobody else does that either, even on the other side. hell forget DNIs, I get less conservatives in my notifs than I used to just by having they/them pronouns in my bio because they see it and go "ew, I'm not following them". people dont typically follow people theyre clearly not going to feel welcome around, a DNI is just another way to communicate that.
1 - you don't have to Get Along with someone to follow them. people can and will hate-follow or follow to annoy you, block evade, etc out of spite. some people will interact with you just because you told them, or people like them, not to.
2 - your experiences are not universal. nazis, terfs, bigots in general, they can and will follow and harass people they don't like online. this is spoken from my own experience as someone who has seen his transfem friends be followed and harassed by alt-right nut jobs online.
3 - "forget DNIs, I get less conservatives in my notifs than I used to just by having they/them pronouns in my bio" ← you're right. this is effective because the vast majority of people regardless of political stance or belief will only ever read your bio. not many people are going to jump through hyperlinks to read your DNI. if they don't like what they read in your bio, they'll just leave [or possibly harass you, if they're particularly malicious]. ergo, making a DNI is largely just for yourself and not at all a real, useful barrier people must pass through in order to follow / engage with your posts.
no one is stopping you from making a DNI. you can write a terms-of-service length novel of a Do Not Interact list, put it on its own Carrd and make it aesthetic and pretty with flair. you're completely free to do so and tell people to read it. a few will, sure.
however. the post you're referencing is specifically addressing the glaring reality that most people, regardless if they fit your DNI criteria or not, are simply not going to go out of their way to find and read it. abusive people aren't going to see "DNI abusive assholes" and be deterred because they themselves don't consider themselves abusive. this post, particularly what OP wrote, is saying how it's much more proactive to curate your own space through utilizing the block button and tag filters when you see things and people you don't want to engage with instead of trying to impose your personal boundaries on strangers online.
addendum // i don't really care if teens are making DNIs and being aggressively annoying about em. i remember the era of setting weird arbitrary rules in my developing years while i was forming Who I Was as a person. they're figuring out who they are and what their comfort levels are. i get it. it's the grownass adults that are hyper-virulent about DNIs that i worry about - and i'm not talking about when they're trying to establish an adults-only space with a stern "minors DNI".
note: what i'm talking about below, i am Not referring to literally illegal and harmful activities / content. just want to be clear.
now, i'm not saying you have to welcome and embrace the content you don't like, but it's important to challenge yourself and toe your comfort boundaries. if you over-prune yourself trying to be the bestest morally correct person, at some point you're going to start boxing yourself into this narrowed teeny tiny worldview. you may turn into the person you claim to have loathed, imposing personal beliefs and morals on others, and brandishing your DNI like it's a certificate of righteousness; not unlike how conservatives wave around religious scripture while pruning away LGBTQ+ rights because it goes against their morality. a few examples of this are topics such as: kink at pride, and the language discrepancies between the younger and older generations of the LGBTQ+ community - particularly in regards to self-identifying with words such as Queer and Dyke and Transsexual.
i probably derailed a bit here, i'm answering this before my caffeine's fully kicked in. if i vaguely worded something or yall want more elaboration on something, don't hesitate to ask
114 notes
·
View notes
Note
Okay offering a bit of an alternative perspective, let me establish rn im not a fan of tme/tma either 👍
So i think it gets lost on people that tme/tma was coined SPECIFICALLY to describe intracommunity dynamics, like cis people were simply. Not factored into the coining of the terms, or the topics it was intended to discuss.
Honestly, i think the idea that transfeminine people being oft excluded from integrated community with transmasc individuals is grounded in reality, but it absolutely requires intersectionality for it to be legitimized and elaborated on in a meaningful way. Which, well, transradfems dont like intersectionality very much at all.
And speaking as a nonwhite perisex afab person. The trans women and fems who get excluded from trans men and masc circles are excluded for the same reasons poc trans men/mascs are excluded from those spaces. And you know the people i see doing much of the excluding, whether they declare themselves allies to transfems or not, are middle to upper class white transmascs. Speaking from personal experience, there does seem to be a demographic implicitly ignorant of the transfems they are in community with, and a lot of it stems from what i observe as a sort of inability or unwillingness to reject the politics of the communities they were raised in (lots of liberalism and cultural feminism). They sort of unconsciously reinforce socialization segregated by gender.
It’s a reproduction of a general pattern of thinking you see with cis gay people, who also tend to be white: i cant be that bigoted because im x. Obviously, this is also an issue with white transfems, but not in the same ways as they are with transmascs, and i think anyone who sweeps this issue under the rug are being dishonest with themselves. But my point stands that, within the demographic, certain groups of transmascs can be afforded a specific form of privilege, not because they *are* transmasc, but because theyre *not transfem*. Because at its core, that is privilege— not being subject to certain types of treatment, or being less prone to certain conditions, on the basis of not possessing socially marked traits you dont have control over.
Transradfem discourse fails in that it cant decide whether it truly wants to be about intracommunity discussion or not. Whether it treats transmisogyny as a grand or local narrative depends entirely on what’s convenient to argue a specific point. The only thing consistent about their worldview is that transfems are at the bottom, dehumanized, abused, and cast aside always, with no room for any nuance, because to acknowledge situations in which such totalizing logic fails can only ever be an invalidation of their trauma.
And perhaps the most important thing that should be kept in mind when talking about these things is that other trans people are hardly ever the enemy. Trans people with differing viewpoints on intracommunity relations are not the same as sellouts like blaire white or brianna wu who do the “fuck you got mine” shit. This goes for the transradfems who constantly talk down to “transandrobros”, but it also applies to some of us in that we cant let a vocal minority sway our perceptions of the majority. Most transfems dont give two craps about this.
I do not view "not being a transfem" as a privilege for other trans people, regardless of any nuance or moderation one may take that view with. You may not be subject to some extremely specific behaviors, but to call it "privilege" when one faces oppression on that same axis is highly misleading at best. Exclusion of transfems by transmascs is not worse or more pervasive of an issue than the reverse.
I'm also not a fan of how often intercommunity discourse gets boiled down to The Whites Are At It Again, especially because transradfems are often saying that about transandrophobia believers. Plenty of white transmascs are also excluded simply for their masculinity and to say all (including presumably white) transfems are treated like PoC trans men is, I feel, very dismissive and inaccurate.
24 notes
·
View notes
Note
you shouldnt need some get-out-of-bigotry-free card from your religious doctrine in order to be a good person. thats not how good people decide things. good people do something to help rather than explain how theyre definitely not associated with bigots because of the fine-print.
do you even care about all the injustice and pain and murder in the world because of christian hatred, or do you think is all a rules-game and we all get to go to a morally-acceptable afterlife in the end? do you give a s*** or are you going to keep making excuses for yourself so you dont have to re-examine what you believe and why?
you cant excise out the hatred and shame from any of it. every institution in the world was built on that- the original intent of god or jesus or whoever the f*** doesnt matter, because thats lost. it has been for a long time.
you want to believe in god? or a doctrine of harmony and acceptance and justice? make one up. you can do a better job.
This was quite the message to wake up to. I'm sorry for taking a while to respond, I wanted to give it as much care as I could while also being punctual in my response, and those are some tricky things to juggle. I'm putting the rest of this post under a cut for those who'd like to avoid this discussion.
I'm assuming you're responding to my previous posts where I talked about my being Christian and my perspective on people's divine right to choose the way they live and believe, and answered some responses to my initial points. But I'm really confused as to what “get-out-of-bigotry-free card” you're referring to. Are you talking about how I described agency? That wasn't intended to be seen in any way like you've described it. I also didn't ever boast about being a good person as this message seems to imply. I try to be a good person, but I don't wave it about on a flag to brag about.
I'm sorry if this is presumptuous to say, but you're coming at me with a very hostile, angry tone while assuming many things about what I've said and who I am as a person. I'm sorry that what I've said has clearly hurt you in order to have gotten this reaction, but I'm a human being as much as you are. If you are hurting, I want to talk about that hurt in a calm way. We don't need to sling curse words or accusations to do so.
For the first point of your second paragraph— do you even care about all the injustice and pain and murder in the world because of christian hatred, or do you think is all a rules-game and we all get to go to a morally-acceptable afterlife in the end— yes, I do care. It disgusts me that people have warped a message of love and charity into something so repulsive that they can use to justify acts of malice and hatred. Christian hatred is a fundamentally vile phrase to me, because Christianity is defined in my religion as “taking upon you the name of Christ”— which essentially means striving to live to be as much like Jesus as possible. Jesus wasn't hateful. Jesus wasn't cruel. Jesus was shown a woman who was set to be stoned to death and told the people who brought her forward to mind their own business and think about their own lives, then bent down and offered her compassion and comfort. As for myself, there's circumstances in my life that prevent me from doing much concrete advocacy for many causes, but I speak and vote where I can to make the world a happier place, protect people's rights, and defend them against predatory behavior. I'm unfamiliar with the phrase “rules-game” and couldn't find a definition for it, so I can't answer that portion of your question directly, but I believe that the afterlife is fundamentally morally acceptable, yes. I wouldn't be following a religion that I found immoral on a doctrinal level.
For the second question of that first paragraph: I'm not going to use the same phrasing as you, but I do give a hoot. I also didn't try to make any excuses for myself. I'm confused as to where you felt like I did so. I do regularly consider my belief system and why I believe it, as well as consider the journey I've taken with my faith. I've identified myself as an atheist and an agnostic at various points in life before coming back to Christianity. To put it in a nutshell, I've done a lot of thinking on the subject throughout the years and have grappled with a lot of things about my religion that I didn't understand when I was younger, until I got a better recognition of them. I am not a blind follower of my faith.
You said “you can't excise out the hatred and shame from any of it. Every institution in the world was built on that- the original intent of God or Jesus or whoever(…) doesn't matter, because that's lost.” I don't think we'll agree on this point, because we're coming at this from two very different worldviews. My church doesn't believe humanity is a gaggle of kids that God left in a hot car in some cosmic parking lot. We believe in God communicating with people throughout every era— He's still talking to and guiding humanity. We call ourselves the restored church because we believe in continuing revelation, that God isn't done revealing the Gospel to us in its entirety. We've got the fundamentals, yes, but we're still learning the deeper stuff, and God is here to hold our hands along the way.
The fact that there is any hatred or shame involved is not something God wants for us. That's something that came into religion from humans, because we're mortal, and we have vices, grudges, flaws, and temptations. We're not perfect, and we bring imperfection wherever we go. That's why we have God directing us to try and improve constantly— to turn the other cheek and remove the beam from our own eye before commenting on the mote in our brother's. We're on individual paths to God, and it's not any one person's place to judge another's life. That's what God's here for, and He's the only one qualified to do it by virtue of knowing us so well that He recognizes the struggles and reasonings behind where we unwillingly fall short. He also recognizes when people act with intentional malice even where we wouldn't see any, and is able to judge accordingly.
Judging by your final paragraph— you want to believe in god? or a doctrine of harmony and acceptance and justice? make one up. you can do a better job— if I'm reading this right, you believe the concept of God is fundamentally discordant, unaccepting, and unjust. We're coming at this from opposing worldviews if this is the case, and aren't going to agree. I believe in a God who is kind and wants to see us succeed. It doesn't seem like you feel the same. I'm sorry, but I don't have much else I can say on the subject. I won't change your mind when this seems like a very vital facet of your belief system, if the conviction you write with is any indicator. You won't change my mind when a caring, present God is something I've experienced so frequently that I can't see the world through any other lens.
I'm sorry that what I said previously seems to have hurt and upset you. It wasn't my intent. I hope that this response is able to communicate that along with my perspective.
22 notes
·
View notes
Note
That post about tme/tma was pretty funny to read as I have as a trans man experienced trans misogyny multiple times. I have a man’s name and dress in men’s clothes and multiple times people have thought I am a trans woman who I guess is mid social transition or smth? Idk man its weird. I think its valuable to talk about different experiences with transphobia within the trans/lgbt community and outside of it but i guess its easy to forget how varied the trans experience can be. Also why is there no term for the transphobia fuelled misogyny trans men face? As a trans man i feel like i can’t escape misogyny even from people who accent me as a man. Misogyny is also often the first punishment and slap in the face against me by transphobes. They rarely say anything about me being trans but just talking sexist shit?
see, thats another thing about transmisogyny that i think a lot of people forget. its not separate from misogyny and transphobia, it is the intersection of those two. so, if someone is both transphobic and misogynist, anybody who they think looks trans and they think looks like a woman is a potential target.
this actually includes, like, a lot of trans men, because 99% of these bigots dont actually care to learn a single thing about trans people. they often literally do not know enough about trans-ness to tell the difference between a trans man and a trans woman. they see someone who looks like theyre doing gender wrong, and they floor it, and anyone who doesnt conform enough can be caught in the crossfire.
additionally, trans men dont get to opt out of misogyny when they start transitioning. many trans men struggle to pass as men, because gender is a tricky thing. and if you dont pass as a man, or if you dont have your legal name changed, or if you dont have your gender marker changed, then anybody could still decide that youre a woman and treat you accordingly. trans men experience misogyny just as much as trans women do, and because they are also trans, they often fall victim to the same structures that cause transmisogyny.
trans men have actually tried a few times to coin words to describe these unique intersectional experiences, similar to the reason transmisogyny was coined, but everytime they have faced pushback from the community, and especially from trans women. transmisandry and transandrophobia are both words that trans men have tried to coin to describe their experiences, and theyve been so thoroughly ridiculed for it that ive seen trans women go around calling people "transandrophobia truthers." these words that trans men have tried to define for themselves have become jokes in the mouths of those who should be their allies.
this is another reason why i am so against tme/tma as labels. if we exclude trans men from being able to be victims of transmisogyny, but we also deny them the words they need to talk about their own unique intersectional experiences of oppression, then we are essentially saying we dont care about those experiences. we are silencing them the same way we have been silenced for years.
thats why im so gungho about trans unity. yes, our experiences are different, but the structures and the people oppressing us are the same. we are not enemies, and if we paint each other as enemies, if we try to silence each other, if we continue to squabble amongst ourselves and focus on what divides us instead of what brings us together...
we are doing the fascists' work for them, and our communities will crumble to dust.
i dont want to live in a world where im enemies with my trans masc brothers. i dont want to live in a world where finding common ground between us is seen as wrong. we have to stick together if we want to survive, but moreover, we have to stick together if we want to thrive. trans men, trans women, and every other flavor of trans people under the sun all enrich the queer experience. it is a beautiful, profound thing to reject ones nature and find belonging with the othered. to sully that beauty with the blood of our allies is to invite the end.
111 notes
·
View notes
Note
i will mention here (anon by principle as to deny them the satisfaction) that i got my first anon hate on this website because of taylor swift. i commented on some big taylor swift related post something pretty tame along the lines of "there's so much more interesting pop music out there and also so much more interesting pop music made by white trust fund kids about there" and apparently that was enough to make someone click on my blog, read my bio which is a pithy allusion to me being a trans girl, and decided they'd "clocked" me and simply had to tell me about it. apparently according to them i'm a "filthy autistic agp troon moid" and i shouldnt talk shit about the "taygod" or something. very embarrassing for them given if anything i'm clearly hsts
WOAHHHHH WTF IM SO SORRY THIS HAPPENED TO YOU ANON !!!! even tho youre playing it off in a humorous way this is still pure evil im so sorry this happened to you!!! swifties are fucking evil theyre never beating the bigot allegations as a fanbase i swear!!!
#and the better music by white trust fund kids youre talking about is grimes and clairo and lady gaga and xyz celebs#they seriously wonder why people resent them and their fave but cannot look at their actions and take a moment to reflect#anti taylor swift#ask#notyouraryang0dd3ss#anon#transphobia#ableism
9 notes
·
View notes
Text
listen, i know i dont post a lot of my own shit on here, mostly reblogs, but this is serious
THESE KIDS SHOULDNT BE FUCKING DYING BECAUSE OF BIGOTED PRICKS WHO WANT CONTROL
i mean Nex Benedict, he didnt deserve to be beaten and then die because of said injuries from being beaten. not at fucking ALL. this was a 16 year old non-binary 2-spirited kid, who was a product of multiple minorities. he was fucking bullied for a year, and is getting hated on IN HIS FUCKING DEATH for snapping back by pouring water on these girls? thats some fucking bullshit right there. he was only 16, he was a baby. he fucking loved mine craft, and his cats and shit. it could have been any one of us, and this poor angel died because some asshats decided they were better than him and beat him until he eventually died. and the adults involved with covering up his murder? absolutely disgusting pieces of shit for not helping him, calling an ambulance, calling the lgbtq disgusting (or whatever the fucking cunt said, I'm so angry i cant pay full attention). they are disgusting pieces of shit for letting this poor kiddo die. plus, ruling it as a suicide is BULLSHIT. it is SO FUCKING HARD to overdose on antidepressants, much less antihistamines
Nex, I am so so sorry that society, that your school, the government, I'm so sorry that they failed you
and kids like Brianna Ghey, i havent even fucking HEARD about her until tonight. these poor angels were fucking killed for being themselves, and their stories havent even been told.
i expect so so much fucking better from the non-binary and trans and gender fluid communities, hell, i expected more from everyone. as someone who thought they were trans, this could have been me. this could have been anyone from these communities, or any other fucking minority. speak up and fucking talk about these kids
finally, the Palestinian children. none of them fucking deserve to suffer, starve, be bombed, have to see their families die, have to eat animal food, have to live in fear. babies, unborn, newborn, and not even a year old. theyre dying because theyre premature, underweight, unhealthy, STARVING. kids are dying, toddlers who are the same as your own babies, theyre starving and getting bombed. that poor 5 year old who was murdered after having to watch the rest of her family die? that sweet girl didnt deserve that fate in any way, she was FUCKING FIVE YEARS OLD. israel is committing war crimes against these people who never deserved it. stand for these people, otherwise you are complacent in a genocide
IF YOU SUPPORT ANY OF THE PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN MURDERING THESE CHILDREN, GO THE FUCK AWAY YOU DISGUST ME
#palestine#from the river to the sea palestine will be free#free gaza#palestinians#israeli occupation#nex benedict#justice for nex benedict#hate crime#protect trans kids#brianna ghey#justice for these poor babies
11 notes
·
View notes
Note
trans people aren't hurting anyone with what they do. that should be reason enough to see them as how they identify, no? i know today it's hectic with so many non dysphoric people. shouldn't you, as a feminist be moving past defining the limitations of men and women by biology?
if their ideology and what theyre pushing for was truly hurting nobody, i would still be in support of their movement the way i was the first 5 or so years i heard of trans activism.
insisting that there is no kind of potential harm to self-ID laws and that no one will be hurt by it and saying anyone who identifies as a woman should be allowed into women's spaces isn't "not hurting anyone". in fact, it very clearly endangers women. there are countless predators who have invaded women's spaces, recorded women in bathrooms or sexually assaulted women or flashed women. this already happens without giving them loopholes that allow them to do it more easily.
insisting that putting anyone who identifies as a woman into women's prisons isn't "not hurting anyone" when this has resulted in literal rapists being put in prisons filled with vulnerable women who ended up being sexually abused by said rapists.
insisting that anyone who identifies as a woman gets to go into women's sports isn't "not hurting anyone" when it results in unfairness and pushes women out of sports, defeating the entire purpose of even having a women's category in sports.
insisting that lesbians are attracted to anyone who identifies as a woman isn't "not hurting anyone" when this resulted in the cotton ceiling and lesbians being harassed and deemed "terfs" & "bigots" for not wanting to have sex with someone who has a penis.
insisting that anyone who identifies as a woman gets to be considered for female-only scholarships or other facilities such as quotas meant to help women access education or certain careers isn't "not hurting anyone" when it results in males applying for said scholrships and facilities and getting awarded a place that was intended for someone of the female sex.
insisting that sex doesn't matter and is a social construct isn't "not hurting anyone" when it pushes harmful pseudo-science and women's health is already understudied. moreover, it has made it so women cannot even discuss abortion as a women's rights struggle.
insisting that access to transition needs to be made available to kids as long as they believe they're trans isn't "not hurting anyone" when gay children are more likely to be impacted by the idea that their gender non-conformity means they're "born in the wrong body" and has resulted in numerous kids transitioning due to comorbid mental health issues, internalised homophobia, and/or internalised misogyny.
these are just a few examples off the top of my head. if it was harmless, i would not care and i doubt anyone else would care. if some random adult decided to transition but did not do any of the aforementioned things and respected women + gay ppl there'd be nothing to be concerned about, but i do care that an ideology seems to take presedence over women's rights and people's well-being.
23 notes
·
View notes
Text
deeply sorry for my poor womens gender and sexuality teacher who has to deal with me turning in a reaction paper like a week late and then will have to deal with a like 8 page paper on how trans women are treated in feminist spaces ESPECIALLY in lesbian spaces do NOT bring up the womyn born womyn riot grrrl music festivals I start like foaming at the mouth or some shit it should not be a sin to have some form of SOMETHING society has deemed as masculine I'm gonna start jeff the killing or some shit I swear to god what the FUUUUCK being a terf automatically goes against the basic fucking stances of baseline fucking feminist thought you can not believe in yas girl boss slay women can do anything and then be mad that that girl has an adams apple and body hair because you're just so small and frail and there's just such a biological difference between them and you YOURE LITTERALY JUST A FUCKING BIGOT how do you as someone who can look back at third wave feminsim and see who was actively throwing punches to get queer people to be seen as people and then decide that they're actually the bad guys they're clearly so violent and scary and maybe even predatory they're pushing the patriarchy THE PATRIARCHY WANTS YOU TO DIE AND THESE ARE THE PEOPLE TELLING THEM TO FUCK OFF I love pasifisic ideals sooo much I want no one to be violent ever BUT THEYRE TRYING TO FUCKING KILL US AND YOURE DECIDING YOUR FUCKING BROTHERS AND SISTERS AND SIBLINGS AND WHATEVER ELSE ARE THE BAD GUY BECAUSE THEYRE TRYING TO KILL THEM A SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT WAY AND THEY DONT WANT TO DIE I HATE THIS SO BAD
4 notes
·
View notes
Text
ill say this time and time again but genuinely i hate people online who keep appointing the cause of every world problems on teenagers who use the internet and are stuck using the same 4 website as all the adults and who are trying to have a safe space without weird shit in it
like i genuinely cant stand adults who spend their day especially whining about how children online are annoying and that their access to the internet should be illegal until they're of age and that they should Die because they're SILENCING OUR RIGHTS!!! (the "silencing" is pointing out how a person was drawing incest and pedophilia and disability fetish art)
like i cant stand you all. you dont fucking understand anything. im not saying every teenager online is automatically a saint. we make msitakes when we're teens and that's it but unless it's something voluntarily bigoted and harmful it's literally not something to get your panties in a twist about. and blaming children for how strongly NSFW is getting restricted on socmed isnt it lmfao. because its lawmakers implementing those rules, ones that arent benefitting anyone but them & investors that want to look clean. like trust me they dont fucking care about what children have to say (especially if theyre black and/or poc and as a bonus lgbtq or disabled and so forth.)
its why i genuinely will keep standing up for teenagers online. its like none of you stupid cucks understand that most of us grew up on a fairly child-friendly internet with a huge array of sites where children could go and play games, or be on forums with kids their own age. you know where those sites went? they either went bankrupt (because parents decided it was not fucking worth to keep paying the premium subscription for a website mmorpg with a predatory payment plan - which is fair, but ultimately will affect the kid still) or barely scraping by via appealing to current website/social media standards. there is no girlsgogames.com like there was before. no barbie online. and so forth. these fuckers who keep blaming kids for everything literally dont fucking want to understand children nowadays who want an escapade from a possibly bad real life situation literally have Nowhere else to Fucking Go if they dont want to be monitored by potentially abusive parents (or just want some damn privacy for x amount of reasons)
this shit makes me so pissed off. going back to finish my thesis. bye
9 notes
·
View notes
Text
so misogyny is prejudice against women and anything feminine because it's "lesser", yeah? i need yall to know misogyny is also what men also suffer from when theyre deemed weak, emotional and unmanly; that they're "as bad as women", so by that line of thinking, they might as well not be men at all. that's it. "androphobia" doesnt exist.
transphobia by itself generally establishes the idea that there's this (bullshit) line between men and women that can't be crossed, with the similar idea misogyny holds that "[gender] isnt like [other gender]".
now i don't know if yall paid attention to these things, but if you put a sporty girl and a meek guy next to each other you know who's getting targeted more, right? because where it's become favorable for women to "do things meant for boys", people's opinion of men diminish when they "do things meant for girls". where equality is achieved through women's efforts to become "as strong as men" rather than allowing everyone the leeway to be as they please, without the expectation that one is better than the other through their capabilities as a sign of "being better than just being cute". (this is not to jab at sporty women at all, it's the inspiration porn placed upon them that i'm criticizing.)
that's why there's a need to acknowledge transmisogyny. because while transmascs such as myself obviously experience terrible things, transfems are subjected to another entirely separate form of bigotry on top of transphobia—because transmisogyny targets, criticizes and decides one's choice of femininity. where, in transphobia, someone's gender identity is judged as lacking or non-existent, reaching for an identity that bigots believe we cannot reach—transmisogyny then says "true" femininity is lesser, something bigots define by its inferiority to masculinity.
acknowledging this doesn't mean a transmasc's experiences are "easier" or "not as hard". the point is to understand that this is a real phenomenon happening to our community, not something to judge how much less or more a minority suffers compared to another.
misogyny says women are lesser, and that men are lesser and comparable to women if they aren't masculine by conservative standards.
"androphobia" does not exist.
transphobia says men and women are not one in the same and one cannot become the other.
transmisogyny says transfems aren't women because "real" women are defined by how closely they follow beauty standards and being "biologically lesser" than men.
"transandrophobia" does not exist.
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
hello, you can call me artyom. like stated in my description i am a 21y/o gay/aro cis male. this is a hornyblog so that should be enough to tell minors to simply fuck off.
⸺⸺⛧________ ⛧ ________⛧⸺⸺
DNI:
terfs.
minors.
pedos.
wlw blogs.
bigots.
phobes.
cis dni blogs.
excusively t4t blogs. (im not trans, but im not a phobe.)
racists.
blank profiles.
profiles w/ no age.
zoophiles.
like i have said, do not follow or comment if you are any of the above. likes are fine but no reblogging or replying if you are so. if you do, immediate block. if you decide to be a fucking pissbaby yourself and contact me being any of the above, you and i can have a chit-chat and handle it. if you cannot somehow bare to not talking to me with me telling you to basically "fuck off.", that's a you problem.
⸺⸺⛧________ ⛧ ________⛧⸺⸺
yes, i know i am a horny on the main person but that doesn't mean you cannot talk to me about normal stuff. im open to just about anything, kink talk or just about life in general, dm's are open to followers and mutuals, talk to me, i dont bite; maybe just a little.
⸺⸺⛧________ ⛧ ________⛧⸺⸺
a 6'3 gay as hell russian that is deeply into learning about religion, psychology, mixology, crime and war so you can talk to me about those too. or about sports, i do wrestling.
⸺⸺⛧________ ⛧ ________⛧⸺⸺
titles i enjoy are sir and mister.
also i am perfectly okay with transmascs! theyre adorable.
_
kinks.
bold is my favourites, italic is cautious with.
_
me@you;
choking.
hair pulling.
slutshaming.
burns.
somno.
bruises and marks.
impact play.
cnc.
bondage. (cuffs, belt, chains and rope.)
biting.
breeding. (but no impreg.)
degration.
praise.
overstim.
crying. (you.)
freeuse.
large size + strength difference. (you being smaller and weaker.)
manhandling.
knifeplay + gunplay.
_
holy fuck do NOT do: shit, piss, feet, dollification, race, age gap, ddlg/mdlb, abdl, vomit.
⸺⸺⛧________ ⛧ ________⛧⸺⸺
16 notes
·
View notes