#androgny

[his-grace-mark-tsar-of-tartary]

Title: The Limitations of Computer Terminology in Describing Human Complexity

Introduction

In recent years, discussions surrounding gender identity have become more prevalent and nuanced. As society seeks to understand and respect the diverse experiences of individuals, terms such as "cis" and "non-binary" have emerged to describe different gender identities. However, it can be argued that using computer-related terminology to explain the complexities of human identity is inadequate, potentially insulting, and ultimately misleading. This article aims to explore the limitations of such terminology and highlight the importance of acknowledging the multifaceted nature of human beings.

Human Complexity and Organic Nature

Humans are incredibly complex beings, encompassing a wide range of physical, emotional, and psychological characteristics. Our identities are not solely determined by our biological attributes but are shaped by a myriad of factors, including cultural, social, and personal experiences. Unlike computers, which operate on binary code and function in a predictable manner, humans possess a vast spectrum of thoughts, feelings, and identities that cannot be neatly categorized.

Inadequacy of Cis and Non-Binary Terminology

The terms "cis" and "non-binary" were introduced to facilitate discussions about gender identity. "Cisgender" refers to individuals whose gender identity aligns with the sex they were assigned at birth, while "non-binary" encompasses individuals whose gender identity falls outside the traditional binary of male and female. While these terms serve a purpose in promoting inclusivity, they fall short in capturing the intricacies and depth of human identity.

Firstly, the term "cisgender" implies a binary understanding of gender, reinforcing the notion that there are only two distinct options. This oversimplification fails to account for the diverse range of gender expressions and identities that exist beyond the male-female binary. By reducing human complexity to a binary categorization, we risk erasing the experiences of individuals who identify differently.

Secondly, the term "non-binary" itself may be misleading and reductive. It suggests that there is an absence or negation of gender identity, rather than recognizing the presence of a rich and diverse spectrum of gender experiences. Individuals who identify as non-binary may have unique and deeply personal experiences of gender that cannot be accurately encapsulated by a single term.

Insulting Assumptions and Misleading Connotations

Applying computer-related terminology to describe human identity can be perceived as insulting and reductionist. It suggests that human experiences and identities can be neatly categorized and understood through a binary lens, akin to how computers process data. This oversimplification minimizes the complexity and legitimacy of individual experiences, potentially leading to misunderstandings and perpetuating stereotypes.

Moreover, comparing human complexity to computer processes can be misleading. Computers operate on logical algorithms and predictable patterns, whereas human behavior and identity are shaped by a multitude of unpredictable factors. By using computer terminology to explain human experiences, we risk undermining the uniqueness and individuality of human beings.

Embracing Complexity and Individuality

To truly understand and respect the complexities of human identity, we must move beyond simplistic categorizations. Embracing the diversity and individuality of human experiences requires a more nuanced and inclusive approach, one that acknowledges the fluidity and multiplicity of identities.

Instead of relying solely on terms such as "cis" and "non-binary," we should encourage open and respectful conversations that allow individuals to express their unique experiences and identities. By actively listening and learning from diverse perspectives, we can foster a society that values and celebrates the richness of human complexity

and recognizes that individuals cannot be reduced to simple labels or categories.

Furthermore, it is essential to recognize that gender identity is just one aspect of human complexity. Individuals are shaped by a multitude of intersecting factors such as race, ethnicity, culture, religion, sexuality, and personal experiences. Attempting to explain the entirety of a person's identity using computer terminology is not only inadequate but also dismissive of these other dimensions of their being.

By acknowledging and celebrating the complexity of human identity, we create space for individuals to be seen and understood in their totality. This means moving away from rigid categories and instead embracing a more fluid and expansive understanding of gender and identity. It requires exploring alternative language and frameworks that can capture the intricacies of human experiences without reducing them to simplistic labels.

Language is a powerful tool that shapes our perceptions and understanding of the world. As we continue to evolve and progress as a society, it is crucial to critically examine the terminology we use and consider its implications. By using language that is respectful, inclusive, and reflective of the rich diversity of human experiences, we create a more welcoming environment for everyone.

In conclusion, while terms like "cis" and "non-binary" have emerged as attempts to describe gender identities, they are limited in capturing the complexities of human beings. Humans are organic, multifaceted, and defy simple categorizations. Using computer-related terminology to describe the intricacies of human identity not only falls short but can also be insulting and misleading. It is imperative that we move beyond binary thinking and embrace a more inclusive and nuanced understanding of human experiences, one that allows for the full expression and celebration of individual complexity.

[misskattylashes]

Arguably the most femme Alex has looked post Humbug

These photos trigger something in me .

[spacephobos]

cant stop thinking about my rebecca romijn as gabrielle de lioncourt fancast

shes tall hot blonde european pulls off androgny in her 50s and can speak french and italian. like ong shed be so perfect???

[3ger]

please stop posting that person of ambiguous gender i admire their androgny but its getting kinda forced and narcissistic seeing them 10 different times and lowkey theyre kinda ugly

my love ♡ either enjoy the privilege of choosing to see my "ugly" face or not, while you still can and kindly press the block button or get used to it. if you see me 10 different times it means i'm doing something right. this is my blog and if i want to post the same picture 30 times in a row of my face, i will. hope u have a lovely day and figure out a way to become a more loving and mature human ♡

[cconfusedkat]

Also im shy to announce this anywhere else atm,, ,but im coming out as a trans girl specifically ,,, im comfortable now saying i am a trans girl instead of other labels

Ive been pushing transfeminity aside for also identifying with transneufem and transandrofem

And while i still feel like my identity *is* def neutral ,, and all ,,, ive felt more comfortable with both masculinity and androgny presenting wise ,,, but internally i feel as i am just a trans girl

Manly because i always struggle with wanting to perceived more masculine but its the fear of "but im a trans girl why would i want to be masculine" ,, so its all out of intersexism against myself unfortunately

Ive come to terms with just being a transfem who loves masculine terms frequently :-]c its similarly to how i use my prns,, instead of using mirror pronouns i will say my main pronouns are he/hxm !!!!

That felt nice to say 🎊🎊 i cannot come out to my family with this so it feels better to type :>

[puppy-b0y-prince]

Me: Yeah haha I'm just a transgender femboy!

Me on the inside: My gender is that of primordial, ancient, and long forgotten shapshiffting trickster spirits. Ancient androgny; it knows no bounds nor limits for expression, nor does it fully understand the human need to access it. Referring to itself as 'he' and 'him' and masculine language as mere titles.

[genderfluid-info-blog]

Genderfluid micro label of the week: Linflux

Linflux is a form of genderfluidity. Linflux people have a gender which fluctuates between androgynous genders that are not necessarily androgyne or androgyne-aligned. This includes androgynous, feminine and masculine genders, unaligned genders, xenogenders as well as male-aligned and female-aligned genders that are androgynous/connected to androgny. Linflux is a subset of genderflux and the counterpart to femflux and mascflux.

[soupandflowers]

okay like . i do like how yao does have a bit of femininity in how he is drawn, i think he looks gorgeous and i love seeing androgny towards my favs (im projecting)

though i do feel that yao leans more on the masculine side overall, so i wish sometimes hima would treat him as such. i would love it if hima could give my boy a good mixture of both.....

[chatter-crow]

giving androgny today

[bivillains]

White tumblr transmascs when they see an orientalist caricature (usually also transmisogynist) fuckkkkkkk that's so gender. I want to be him I mean them. I find it really genderfucky when male characters perform a caricaturized femininity based on south asian/west asian women. I find it really epic when it's a man in a dress joke but it's man in orientalist belly dancer clothes. This is the peak of androgny.

[maik-ol]

IM SO TIRED OF THE MASCULINE FIGURE BEING CONSIRDED THE FIGURE OF ANDROGNY

[dearmahiru-archive]

i never realized it until now but don't you think mahiru and kotoko complement eachother quite nicely?

mahiru:

— brown short hair with an undercut —  gentle brown tareme eyes — single sunflower earrings — shortest adult prisoner (154 cm) — often likened to the sun because of her sunny disposition (+ she's a bluebird) — wants to wear a wedding ring

kotoko:

— black short hair with an undercut — intense red tsurime eyes — stacked piercings — described as a model's physique (171 cm) — runs with her wolf pack during the nighttime, and dawn breaks during the climax of harrow — wears two silver rings

which is interesting isn't it? though their personalities are very different from one another, they're quite like two sides of the same coin in terms of character design. this intrigues me because it brings attention to a fascinating aspect about them, namely, their divergent views on femininity.

Mahiru’s 14 items to stop men’s hearts with your feminine charm Learn how to do everything from the distinct slim silhouette that’s popular with men to playing the part of the mature oneesan. Be sure to get the items that catch your eyes ♪

Q. What do you think about the word 'femininity'? Kotoko: "It's one of the means you can take. It's something you can freely choose depending on the scene, so it's not something to cling onto."

femininity is something mahiru actively pursues as apart of her gender expression. though she can simply enjoys being cute, mahiru is also very insecure, being pressured by the magazines to "always look her best," and seeking constant attention from her boyfriend. in other words, something she clings to. (add that to the "mahiru suffocation symbolism" board, boys.)

meanwhile, kotoko thinks of femininity as an asset, something to use. in a similar manner, she's also seen using androgny to her advantage. in harrow, she consciously wear baggy clothing, hoods, and masks outside to make it harder for the police to identify her. (i'm quite interested in what she'd look like in a softer more preppy style honestly.)

this doesn't have a thesis or anything btw o7 i'm just ill about them and convinced something major will happen between them. they're gonna kiss i can feel it in my bones

[demnic-katch]

Feel like i was really rocking the androgny with this one.

[woodyvibe]

androgny

[skittlespizza]

In another world I'm a prince btw. Yeah. Like Utena. Like Princess Tutu. Like Shilo Bathroy. Yeah, sorry to break it to you. I'm rescuing people with my androgny. Yeah. I'm dressed head to toe in ouji wear. If you even care.

[ace-in-a-shopping-cart]

Me: Intersex people exist, God made them that way. Ergo, God intended for there to be something other man and woman.

Dad: . . . . How about no. We have that because the world has been messed up from the Fall of Man and in a perfect world that wouldn't exist.

What I wanted to say: Then why do we wear clothes? That is also a result of the Fall and you're perfectly fine with it. Why is androgny any different, just because the Bible doesn't explicitly state that people can be trans because the times didn't have words to describe it? God always uses the outcasts for his plans, see the left handed Judge.

What actually happened: We both went to bed, me forever frustrated with his bullheaded ways