#chatgpt content detector

[zerogpt3]

An AI Detector is a tool that uses a vast datasets of information to determine whether a piece of text is genuinely human-writtten or if it's AI-generated.

[zerogpt11]

Detect ai generated text for Free, simple way & High accuracy. Ai content check, ai content detection tool, ai essay detector for teacher.

[eienieeee]

Hello, everyone!

First off, I’m sorry for even having to post this, and I’m usually nice to everyone I come into contact with, but I received a startling comment on my newest fic, Paint-Stained Hands and Paper Hearts, where I was accused of pumping out the entire chapter solely using AI.

I am thirty-two years old and have been attending University since I was 18 YEARS OLD. I am currently working on obtaining my PhD in English Literature as well as a Masters in Creative Writing. So, there’s that.

There is an increasing trend of online witch hunts targeting writers on all platforms (fanfic.net, ao3, watt pad, etc), where people will accuse them of utilizing AI tools like ChatGPT and otherwise based solely on their writing style or prose. These accusations often come without concrete evidence and rely on AI detection tools, which are known to be HELLA unreliable. This has led to false accusations against authors who have developed a particular writing style that AI models may emulate due to the vast fucking amount of human-written literature that they’ve literally had dumped into them. Some of these people are friends of mine, some of whom are well-known in the AO3 writing community, and I received my first comment this morning, and I’m pissed.

AI detection tools work by analyzing text for patterns, probabilities, and structures that resemble AI-generated outputs. HOWEVER, because AI models like ChatGPT are trained on extensive datasets that include CENTURIES of literature, modern writing guides, and user-generated content, they inevitably produce text that can mimic various styles — both contemporary and historical. Followin’ me?

To dumb this down a bit, it means that AI detection tools are often UNABLE TO DISTINGUISH between human and AI writing with absolute certainty.

Furthermore, tests have shown that classic literary works, like those written by Mary Shelley, Jane Austen, William Shakespeare, and Charles Dickens, frequently trigger AI detectors as being 100% AI generated or plagiarized. For example:

Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein has been flagged as AI-generated because its formal, structured prose aligns with common AI patterns.

Jane Austen’s novels, particularly Pride and Prejudice, often receive high AI probability scores due to their precise grammar, rhythmic sentence structures, and commonly used words in large language models.

Shakespeare’s works sometimes trigger AI detectors given that his poetic and structured style aligns with common AI-generated poetic forms.

Gabriel Garcia Marquez’s Love in the Time of Cholera and One Hundred Years of Solitude trigger 100% AI-generated due to its flowing sentences, rich descriptions, and poetic prose, which AI models often mimic when generating literary or philosophical text.

Fritz Leiber’s Fafhrd and the Grey Mouser’s sharp, structured rhythmic prose, imaginative world building, literary elegance, and dialogue-driven narratives often trigger 100% on AI detectors.

The Gettysburg fucking Address by Abraham Lincoln has ALSO been miss classified as AI, demonstrating how formal, structured language confuses these detectors.

These false positives reveal a critical flaw in AI detection: because AI has been trained on so much human writing, it is nearly impossible for these tools to completely separate original human work from AI-generated text. This becomes more problematic when accusations are directed at contemporary authors simply because their writing ‘feels’ like AI despite being fully human.

The rise in these accusations poses a significant threat to both emerging and established writers. Many writers have unique styles that might align with AI-generated patterns, especially if they follow conventional grammar, use structured prose, or have an academic or polished writing approach. Additionally, certain genres— such as sci-fi, or fantasy, or philosophical essays— often produce high AI probability scores due to their abstract and complex language.

For many writers, their work is a reflection of years—often decades—of dedication, practice, and personal growth. To have their efforts invalidated or questioned simply because their writing is mistaken for AI-generated text is fucking disgusting.

This kind of shit makes people afraid of writing, especially those who are just starting their careers / navigating the early stages of publication. The fear of being accused of plagiarism, or of relying on AI for their creativity is anxiety-inducing and can tank someone’s self esteem. It can even stop some from continuing to write altogether, as the pressure to prove their authenticity becomes overwhelming.

For writers who have poured their hearts into their work, the idea that their prose could be mistaken for something that came from a machine is fucking frustrating. Second-guessing your own style, wondering if you need to change how you write or dumb it down in order to avoid being falsely flagged—this fear of being seen as inauthentic can stifle their creative process, leaving them hesitant to share their work or even finish projects they've started. This makes ME want to stop, and I’m just trying to live my life, and write about things I enjoy. So, fuck you very much for that.

Writing is often a deeply personal endeavor, and for many, it's a way to express thoughts, emotions, and experiences that are difficult to put into words. When those expressions are wrongly branded as artificial, it undermines not just the quality of their work but the value of their creative expression.

Consider writing habits, drafts, and personal writing history rather than immediate and unfounded accusations before you decide to piss in someone’s coffee.

So, whatever. Read my fics, don’t read my fics. I just write for FUN, and to SHARE with all of you.

Sorry that my writing is too clinical for you, ig.

I put different literary works as well as my own into an AI Detector. Here you go.

[glittercake]

think i found another ai fic... one chapter was 26% ai another 21% one chapter was "probably human written" but still... and it's written on anon...

i appreciate you so much samantha and all the work and effort and time you put into your amazing writing, you're amazing💖💖💖

I learned recently that some folks use chatgpt or the likes to edit their fics. This is a terrible idea but I do think that it might contribute to some of the results we're seeing. It's both difficult and inaccurate to confirm ai generation when the ai detection result isn't paired with other factors like frequently posting high word counts, or dull monotone writing, or absolutely perfect grammar etc. So people should definitely stop using chatgpt for spell checks.

Something else that might trigger a positive ai result is the use of tools like Grammarly and so on, which I've mentioned before that I have been using for years for spag. But they recently (?) introduced a generative ai element that rewrites content for you or that generates a new sentence on the spot. This does however result in a positive ai detection because well, the ai did it.

Do we stop using these types of tools now? I don't think that's necessary and there are probably minimal checkers left that have no integrated ai at all. Most spag checkers including Word, use some kind of non-genative ai to alert you to errors in a more evolved way than before. (Google Docs' spag checker just got stupider as it "evolved" btw. What an absolute dumpster fire.)

BUT be careful how you use it, don't let it reconstruct your work, don't let it automagically write or fix a sentence for you, and don't rely on it to produce flawless content, there is no such thing. Use your brain, ask for a beta reader to assist you, research the things you don't know. Teach yourself to write better. Use the tool for its initial purpose--to check your spelling and grammar. The ai features can usually be switched off in settings. That being said, basic spag checks using these tools shouldn't equate ai generation but it will probably depend on the tool used to detect it.

I want to add that we definitely should not check every fic we're interested in reading for ai. I think that will make the fandom experience terrible and unenjoyable for everyone. Read it in good faith but keep an eye out for stuff like posting large amounts of words on a schedule that is not humanly possible, the writing style, the tone, other use of ai by the person etc. We've been reading fanfic for years, we know when something is off. Block if you suspect it's ai generated.

People who use ai to 'write' fics have no place in fandom spaces.

It's going to become increasingly difficult to detect these things though, since there is also a feature to "humanize" the ai slop 🤢 and I don't know what the way forward is but I do know it's not running every fic through an ai detector. They're not entirely accurate either. The only reason I resorted to an ai detector with that person I initially caught out, was because the tag was clogged with their constant posting and I knew there was no fucking way they were posting that much naturally. The detector just confirmed what I suspected anyway.

I read a fic recently by an Anon author and I thought I was so good and sexy. I really hope it's not the same person you're talking about. I'm not going back to check because my kudo and comment are already on there. I also doubt an ai can write such filthy, steaming smut 😂

And thank you, Anon, for your kind words. Truly appreciate it. 💕

[kanguin]

Prometheus Gave the Gift of Fire to Mankind. We Can't Give it Back, nor Should We.

AI. Artificial intelligence. Large Language Models. Learning Algorithms. Deep Learning. Generative Algorithms. Neural Networks. This technology has many names, and has been a polarizing topic in numerous communities online. By my observation, a lot of the discussion is either solely focused on A) how to profit off it or B) how to get rid of it and/or protect yourself from it. But to me, I feel both of these perspectives apply a very narrow usage lens on something that's more than a get rich quick scheme or an evil plague to wipe from the earth.

This is going to be long, because as someone whose degree is in psych and computer science, has been a teacher, has been a writing tutor for my younger brother, and whose fiance works in freelance data model training... I have a lot to say about this.

I'm going to address the profit angle first, because I feel most people in my orbit (and in related orbits) on Tumblr are going to agree with this: flat out, the way AI is being utilized by large corporations and tech startups -- scraping mass amounts of visual and written works without consent and compensation, replacing human professionals in roles from concept art to story boarding to screenwriting to customer service and more -- is unethical and damaging to the wellbeing of people, would-be hires and consumers alike. It's wasting energy having dedicated servers running nonstop generating content that serves no greater purpose, and is even pressing on already overworked educators because plagiarism just got a very new, harder to identify younger brother that's also infinitely more easy to access.

In fact, ChatGPT is such an issue in the education world that plagiarism-detector subscription services that take advantage of how overworked teachers are have begun paddling supposed AI-detectors to schools and universities. Detectors that plainly DO NOT and CANNOT work, because the difference between "A Writer Who Writes Surprisingly Well For Their Age" is indistinguishable from "A Language Replicating Algorithm That Followed A Prompt Correctly", just as "A Writer Who Doesn't Know What They're Talking About Or Even How To Write Properly" is indistinguishable from "A Language Replicating Algorithm That Returned Bad Results". What's hilarious is that the way these "detectors" work is also run by AI.

(to be clear, I say plagiarism detectors like TurnItIn.com and such are predatory because A) they cost money to access advanced features that B) often don't work properly or as intended with several false flags, and C) these companies often are super shady behind the scenes; TurnItIn for instance has been involved in numerous lawsuits over intellectual property violations, as their services scrape (or hopefully scraped now) the papers submitted to the site without user consent (or under coerced consent if being forced to use it by an educator), which it uses in can use in its own databases as it pleases, such as for training the AI detecting AI that rarely actually detects AI.)

The prevalence of visual and lingustic generative algorithms is having multiple, overlapping, and complex consequences on many facets of society, from art to music to writing to film and video game production, and even in the classroom before all that, so it's no wonder that many disgruntled artists and industry professionals are online wishing for it all to go away and never come back. The problem is... It can't. I understand that there's likely a large swath of people saying that who understand this, but for those who don't: AI, or as it should more properly be called, generative algorithms, didn't just show up now (they're not even that new), and they certainly weren't developed or invented by any of the tech bros peddling it to megacorps and the general public.

Long before ChatGPT and DALL-E came online, generative algorithms were being used by programmers to simulate natural processes in weather models, shed light on the mechanics of walking for roboticists and paleontologists alike, identified patterns in our DNA related to disease, aided in complex 2D and 3D animation visuals, and so on. Generative algorithms have been a part of the professional world for many years now, and up until recently have been a general force for good, or at the very least a force for the mundane. It's only recently that the technology involved in creating generative algorithms became so advanced AND so readily available, that university grad students were able to make the publicly available projects that began this descent into madness.

Does anyone else remember that? That years ago, somewhere in the late 2010s to the beginning of the 2020s, these novelty sites that allowed you to generate vague images from prompts, or generate short stylistic writings from a short prompt, were popping up with University URLs? Oftentimes the queues on these programs were hours long, sometimes eventually days or weeks or months long, because of how unexpectedly popular this concept was to the general public. Suddenly overnight, all over social media, everyone and their grandma, and not just high level programming and arts students, knew this was possible, and of course, everyone wanted in. Automated art and writing, isn't that neat? And of course, investors saw dollar signs. Simply scale up the process, scrape the entire web for data to train the model without advertising that you're using ALL material, even copyrighted and personal materials, and sell the resulting algorithm for big money. As usual, startup investors ruin every new technology the moment they can access it.

To most people, it seemed like this magic tech popped up overnight, and before it became known that the art assets on later models were stolen, even I had fun with them. I knew how learning algorithms worked, if you're going to have a computer make images and text, it has to be shown what that is and then try and fail to make its own until it's ready. I just, rather naively as I was still in my early 20s, assumed that everything was above board and the assets were either public domain or fairly licensed. But when the news did came out, and when corporations started unethically implementing "AI" in everything from chatbots to search algorithms to asking their tech staff to add AI to sliced bread, those who were impacted and didn't know and/or didn't care where generative algorithms came from wanted them GONE. And like, I can't blame them. But I also quietly acknowledged to myself that getting rid of a whole technology is just neither possible nor advisable. The cat's already out of the bag, the genie has left its bottle, the Pandorica is OPEN. If we tried to blanket ban what people call AI, numerous industries involved in making lives better would be impacted. Because unfortunately the same tool that can edit selfies into revenge porn has also been used to identify cancer cells in patients and aided in decoding dead languages, among other things.

When, in Greek myth, Prometheus gave us the gift of fire, he gave us both a gift and a curse. Fire is so crucial to human society, it cooks our food, it lights our cities, it disposes of waste, and it protects us from unseen threats. But fire also destroys, and the same flame that can light your home can burn it down. Surely, there were people in this mythic past who hated fire and all it stood for, because without fire no forest would ever burn to the ground, and surely they would have called for fire to be given back, to be done away with entirely. Except, there was no going back. The nature of life is that no new element can ever be undone, it cannot be given back.

So what's the way forward, then? Like, surely if I can write a multi-paragraph think piece on Tumblr.com that next to nobody is going to read because it's long as sin, about an unpopular topic, and I rarely post original content anyway, then surely I have an idea of how this cyberpunk dystopia can be a little less.. Dys. Well I do, actually, but it's a long shot. Thankfully, unlike business majors, I actually had to take a cyber ethics course in university, and I actually paid attention. I also passed preschool where I learned taking stuff you weren't given permission to have is stealing, which is bad. So the obvious solution is to make some fucking laws to limit the input on data model training on models used for public products and services. It's that simple. You either use public domain and licensed data only or you get fined into hell and back and liable to lawsuits from any entity you wronged, be they citizen or very wealthy mouse conglomerate (suing AI bros is the only time Mickey isn't the bigger enemy). And I'm going to be honest, tech companies are NOT going to like this, because not only will it make doing business more expensive (boo fucking hoo), they'd very likely need to throw out their current trained datasets because of the illegal components mixed in there. To my memory, you can't simply prune specific content from a completed algorithm, you actually have to redo rhe training from the ground up because the bad data would be mixed in there like gum in hair. And you know what, those companies deserve that. They deserve to suffer a punishment, and maybe fold if they're young enough, for what they've done to creators everywhere. Actually, laws moving forward isn't enough, this needs to be retroactive. These companies need to be sued into the ground, honestly.

So yeah, that's the mess of it. We can't unlearn and unpublicize any technology, even if it's currently being used as a tool of exploitation. What we can do though is demand ethical use laws and organize around the cause of the exclusive rights of individuals to the content they create. The screenwriter's guild, actor's guild, and so on already have been fighting against this misuse, but given upcoming administration changes to the US, things are going to get a lot worse before thet get a little better. Even still, don't give up, have clear and educated goals, and focus on what you can do to affect change, even if right now that's just individual self-care through mental and physical health crises like me.

[mariacallous]

AI slop is flowing onto every major platform where people post online—and Medium is no exception.

The 12-year-old publishing platform has undertaken a dizzying number of pivots over the years. It’s finally on a financial upswing, having turned a monthly profit for the first time this summer. Medium CEO Tony Stubblebine and other executives at the company have described the platform as “a home for human writing.” But there is evidence that robot bloggers are increasingly flocking to the platform, too.

Earlier this year, WIRED asked AI detection startup Pangram Labs to analyze Medium. It took a sampling of 274,466 recent posts over a six-week period and estimated that over 47 percent were likely AI-generated. “This is a couple orders of magnitude more than what I see on the rest of the internet,” says Pangram CEO Max Spero. (The company’s analysis of one day of global news sites this summer found 7 percent as likely AI-generated.)

The strain of slop on Medium tends toward the banal, especially compared with the dadaist flotsam clogging Facebook. Instead of Shrimp Jesus, one is more apt to see vacant dispatches about cryptocurrency. The tags with the most likely AI-generated content included “NFT”—out of 5,712 articles tagged with this phrase over the last several months, Pangram found that 4,492, or around 78 percent, came back as likely AI-generated—as well as “web3,” “ethereum,” “AI,” and, for whatever reason, “pets.”

WIRED asked a second AI detection startup, Originality AI, to run its own analysis. It examined a sampling of Medium posts from 2018 and compared it with a sampling from this year. In 2018, 3.4 percent were estimated as likely AI-generated. CEO Jon Gillham says that percentage corresponds to the company’s false-positive rate, as AI tools were not widely used at that point. For 2024, with a sampling of 473 articles published this year, it suspected that just over 40 percent were likely AI-generated. With no knowledge of each others’ analyses, both Originality and Pangram came to similar conclusions about the scope of AI content.

When contacted by WIRED for this article and notified of the results of the AI detection analyses, Stubblebine rejected the premise that Medium has an AI issue. “I am disputing the importance of the results and also the idea that these companies discovered anything,” he says.

Stubblebine does not deny that Medium has seen a major uptick in AI-generated articles. “We think, probably, AI-generated content that gets posted to Medium is probably up tenfold from the beginning of the year,” he says. He also adopts a generally adversarial approach to AI slop appearing on the platform: “We’re strongly against AI content.” But he objects to the use of AI detectors in assessing the scope of the issue, in part because he alleges they cannot differentiate between posts that are wholly AI-generated and posts in which AI is used more lightly. (“That’s not accurate,” Spero says; he claims Pangram can indeed differentiate between a ChatGPT post generated from a prompt and a post based on an AI outline but fleshed out with human writing.)

According to Stubblebine, Medium tested several AI detectors and decided they were not effective. (Stubblebine also accused Pangram Labs of attempting to extort him “by press” because Spero, Pangram’s CEO, sent an email detailing the results of the analysis WIRED had requested and then offered its services to Medium. “I just thought we could help them,” Spero says.)

AI detection tools are, indeed, flawed. They work by analyzing texts and making predictions and can produce false positives and false negatives. Caution using them to judge individual pieces of writing and artwork is warranted, especially with a new wave of tools available to trick them. Still, they have utility as barometers gauging changes in how much AI-generated content exists on certain platforms and websites, and they can help researchers, journalists, and the public to spot patterns.

“Since AI detectors are accurate but not perfect, it is impossible to say with certainty whether any single piece of content is AI-generated or not,” says Gillham. “However, they are great at seeing the trend of AI writing taking over platforms like Medium.”

Others have spotted this trend. “During my regular scans for new AI-generated news sites, I regularly come across AI-generated content on Medium on a weekly basis,” says McKenzie Sadeghi, an editor at online misinformation tracking company NewsGuard. “I've found that most of it is often about crypto, marketing, SEO.”

Stubblebine is adamant that these numbers do not accurately capture what Medium readers experience. “It doesn't matter,” he says. “Having access to the raw feed of what gets posted to Medium doesn't represent the actual activity of what gets recommended and viewed. The vast majority of detectable AI-generated stories in the raw feeds for these topics already have zero views. Zero views is the goal and we already have a system that accomplishes [that].” He believes Medium is effectively containing its AI slop with the combination of its general-purpose spam filtering system and its human moderation.

Many accounts that appear to post high volumes of AI-generated material do, indeed, appear to have puny or non-existent readerships. One account flagged by Pangram Labs as the author of likely AI-generated posts about crypto, for example, posted six times in one day, with no interactions on any of the posts, suggesting a negligible impact. Other flagged posts appear to have been recently pulled down; while some may have been voluntarily removed, others may have been removed by Medium days or weeks after publication. Sometimes, Medium deliberately delays removing spam, according to Stubblebine, if it has identified “spam rings” attempting to game the system.

Zero views was not the case across the board, though. WIRED found that other articles flagged as likely AI-generated by Pangram, Originality, and the AI detection company Reality Defender, had hundreds of “claps,” which are similar to “likes” on other platforms, suggesting at the very least a readership substantially higher than zero.

Stubblebine sees people as the cornerstone of Medium’s approach to quality control. ���Medium basically runs on human curation now,” he says. He cites the 9,000 editors of Medium’s publications, as well as additional human evaluation for stories that can be “boosted” or more widely distributed. “I think you could, if you're being pedantic, say we're filtering out AI—but there's a goal above that, which is, we're just trying to filter out the stuff that's not very good.”

Medium has taken steps this year to curb the presence of robotic bloggers, updating its AI policy. Its stance is a notable contrast to other platforms, like LinkedIn and Facebook, that explicitly encourage people to use AI. Instead, Medium no longer allows AI writing to be paywalled in its Partner program, to receive wider human-curated distribution from its Boost program, or to promote affiliate links. Disclosed AI writing can get general distribution, but undisclosed AI writing is given only “network” distribution, which means it is meant to appear only on the feeds of people who follow the writer. Medium defines AI-generated writing as “writing where the majority of the content has been created by an AI-writing program with little or no edits, improvements, fact-checking, or changes.” Medium does not have any AI-specific enforcement tools for these new rules. “We've found that our existing curation system has the side effect of filtering out AI generated writing simply because AI generated writing is also bad writing,” says Stubblebine.

Some Medium writers and editors do applaud the platform’s approach to AI. Eric Pierce, who founded Medium’s largest pop culture publication Fanfare, says he doesn’t have to fend off many AI-generated submissions and that he believes that the human curators of Medium’s boost program help highlight the best of the platform’s human writing. “I can’t think of a single piece I’ve read on Medium in the past few months that even hinted at being AI-created,” he says. “Increasingly, Medium feels like a bastion of sanity amid an internet desperate to eat itself alive.”

However, other writers and editors believe they currently still see a plethora of AI-generated writing on the platform. Content marketing writer Marcus Musick, who edits several publications, wrote a post lamenting how what he suspects to be an AI-generated article went viral. (Reality Defender ran an analysis on the article in question and estimated it was 99 percent “likely manipulated.”) The story appears widely read, with over 13,500 “claps.”

In addition to spotting possible AI content as a reader, Musick also believes he encounters it frequently as an editor. He says he rejects around 80 percent of potential contributors a month because he suspects they’re using AI. He does not use AI detectors, which he calls “useless,” instead relying on his own judgment.

While the volume of likely AI-generated content on Medium is notable, the moderation challenges the platform faces—how to surface good work and keep junk banished—is one that has always plagued the greater web. The AI boom has simply super-charged the problem. While click farms have long been an issue, for example, AI has handed SEO-obsessed entrepreneurs a way to swiftly resurrect zombie media outlets by filling them with AI slop. There’s a whole subgenre of YouTube hustle culture entrepreneurs creating get-rich-quick tutorials encouraging others to create AI slop on platforms like Facebook, Amazon Kindle, and, yes, Medium. (Sample headline: “1-Click AI SEO Medium Empire 🤯.”)

“Medium is in the same place as the internet as a whole right now. Because AI content is so quick to generate that it is everywhere,” says plagiarism consultant Jonathan Bailey. “Spam filters, the human moderators, et cetera—those are probably the best tools they have.”

Stubblebine’s argument—that it doesn’t necessarily matter whether a platform contains a large amount of garbage, as long as it successfully amplifies good writing and limits the reach of said garbage—is perhaps more pragmatic than any attempt to wholly banish AI slop. His moderation strategy may very well be the most savvy approach.

It also suggests a future in which the Dead Internet theory comes to fruition. The theory, once the domain of extremely online conspiratorial thinkers, argues that the vast majority of the internet is devoid of real people and human-created posts, instead clogged with AI-generated slop and bots. As generative AI tools grow more commonplace, platforms that give up on trying to blot out bots will incubate an online world in which work created by humans becomes increasingly harder to find on platforms swamped by AI.

[cappulcino]

I put your writing in an ai detector and it said it was 87% ai written

I write fanfiction and I'm ADHD-autistic. What did you expect?

80% of the world-building isn't mine. 99% of the characters aren't mine. And I always make sure I don't stray too far from the source plot so I reference/quote a lot of things I didn't write.

If you take my first fanfic on here, it has so many references or direct quotes from the Bible, other myths, and works such as Paradise Lost, Penny Dreadful, or even Good Omens, and some parts have been rewritten word for word. Of course it's not going to be interpreted as original.

It's like my thesis director in college who wondered why his AI and plagiarism detector said we weren't writing our own essays when literally 75% of our writing was based on other people's works and direct quotes.

And I know I write like a robot sometimes. My sentences are always too long, the rhythm is often the same, sometimes I struggle writing certain emotions... I'm working on it. Add to that the fact that I use en-dashes and "OH mY GoD!!! OnLy AI UsEs ThOse!!!" Fuck no. Use dahes.

I'm trying to work on certain things, but it's also my style: pedantic, with strict grammar, precise ponctuation, and little room for improvisation. What should I do then? Re-craft my entire style?

(Also, let me remind you that, so far, most of what I've written called for such a style, according to me. You don't write about noble supernatural beings or knights in the medieval era with your usual, day-to-day speech –at least I don't.)

I'm wondering if this is the same anon again and again, just trying to make some sort of point after the whole ordeal the other day. Your obsession with me is starting to get weird, and I am starting to get tired of answering your idiotic comments. If at least you showed yourself... but you even hide in anon, like you're ashamed.

Nobody is forcing you to like my style –or even me. You've made very clear that AI was a perfect alternative to fandom writers, and I could not care less if you think ChatGPT or CharacterAI are capable enough. It says more about you than it does about anything else.

And you know what? After writing all this, I was curious to see what caused this extraordinarily high number of AI-generated content. So I ran 3 chapters of Seven Days Til Fall, Where the Wild Things Rest, The Shape of Us, and even the fic I'm writing right now through an AI detector, too. And guess what? The highest I got was a 10 % likelihood (yes, because that's all it measures: likelihood), and it was, unsurprisingly, on the longest text.

So next time you want to drag me through mud or something, find a better lie. I'm petty as fuck.

[zerogpt3]

An AI Detector is a tool that uses a vast datasets of information to determine whether a piece of text is genuinely human-writtten or if it's��AI-generated.

[zerogpt11]

Detect ai generated text for Free, simple way & High accuracy. Ai content check, ai content detection tool, ai essay detector for teacher.

[brightowldarkpigeon]

Power_of_Anime_Girl_23’s fic Ministry’s Law - presented as part of the @heartsandcauldrons Gift Exchange 2023 - was written using AI. 

This post will consist of two parts: 1) the evidence that supports this accusation. And 2) my thoughts on the matter. 

I. THE EVIDENCE 

I understand that Power’s style is unique, and it can be difficult to perceive the difference between her works and ones written by AI. The key difference is that her other fics rely on the storytelling standard of scenes whereas her AI fic relies on summary. 

I debated using multiple methods to prove that Ministry’s Law was written with AI. However, after exhaustive research, it is clear that the best AI detector is Copyleaks. Not only has it been shown to be the most accurate AI detector, it was the only AI detector that was able to accurately detect AI-generated text that had been modified by humans.  A cursory google search and the “computer science PhD” who the mods of H&C allegedly consulted both cast aspersions on AI-detection software. It's ’s important to note, however, that this is extremely new technology, which is changing every day. Unless someone is actively studying not just AI, but Large Language Models specifically, it is unlikely that they will have up-to-the-minute knowledge on what is and is not possible with AI-detection software. The research that I was able to do in the past two months points to the fact that at the current moment, as long as the text provided is longer than 1000 words, Copyleaks is astoundingly accurate at detecting AI.

(I also believe that Power’s fics We Found a Family During the Darkest of Days and Loving Dance in the Rain, which were the two fics she published immediately preceding Ministry’s Law, were also partially generated by AI. I think it makes sense that Power started with using a bit of AI and was empowered to use more for her next two fics, which were both published on a deadline. When she was called out, she returned immediately to original writing with her subsequent fic Meet Me By the Waves. I have included the copyleaks reports of all of those fics in my google drive folder, but will not be including them in this analysis because one shows only about 20% AI-content and the other is less than 1000 words. I encourage you to look and judge for yourself.) 

First, let’s compare a sample. One fic written by me using my pseud DarkPigeon, and another with the same prompt, written by ChatGPT.

Clicked by DarkPigeon - Copyleaks Detects 0% AI

Between the Shelves by ChatGPT - Copyleaks Detects 100% AI

Now let’s take a look at three of Power_of_Anime_Girl_23’s fics:

October 20, 2023 -  Family Protect Their Own by Power_of_Anime_Girl_23 - Copyleaks Detects 0% AI

December 15, 2023 - Ministry’s Law “by” Power_Of_Anime_Girl_23  - Copyleaks Detects 97.8% AI

December 31, 2023 - Meet Me by the Waves by Power_Of_Anime_Girl_23 - Copyleaks Detects 0% AI

So, that’s that. Feel free to peruse this Google Drive folder if you have more questions or interest in the matter. (Within the folder, there are folders containing Copyleaks Studies which are the published reports on the accuracy of Copyleaks as an AI-detection tool, and Copyleaks Reports, which are AI-analyses of 5 of Power_of_Anime_Girl_23’s fics, one of mine, and one written by ChatGPT).

II. MY THOUGHTS

I do not expect a response to this from either Power_of_Anime_Girl_23 or the H&C mods. They were made very aware of all of this in private and “unanimously” decided to deny it.

I left Hearts and Cauldrons because I felt that the mods were lacking integrity, and I do not feel the need to argue about this any further. But I’m tired of the culture of obfuscation and anonymity that enshrouds this fandom. Even though I am no longer active on Discord, I value my work as an SSHG writer, and I refuse to be silent on this matter. 

I want to be very clear that this is coming from me and no one else.

I'm sure the dozen or more people who suspected Ministry's Law was written by AI would be willing to leave this in the past. And I know people will accuse me of dredging up a "resolved issue," but since so much of this happened while I was traveling (not to mention the other contentious fandom incidents that have unfolded since then), I didn’t have a chance to collect my thoughts before now. 

Using AI to “write” fics is wrong. Plagiarism is wrong. Lying is wrong.

If anyone chooses to DM me negatively about this, I will post my response publicly. 

Thank you.

[officialjoshwp]

WriteHuman Review: How to Humanizer AI articles using WriteHuman

Would you like to have a more human touch in your AI-generated texts? Don’t worry. In this WriteHuman review, I will delve into a cutting-edge tool that bridges the gap between artificial intelligence and real human communication. WriteHuman is your secret weapon for creating content that resonates, whether you are a student, a blogger, or a business professional.

The solution is WriteHuman, a revolutionary tool that bypasses AI detection and tracking so that any material developed can retain its originality and stand out as unique.

This article scrutinizes the features, benefits, and functionality of WriteHuman, discussing how it enables users to be creative while ensuring their privacy.

Get 50% Off

What Is WriteHuman AI?

WriteHuman is not just another rewriter—it’s something amazing. Here’s why:

Smooth integration: It can be perfectly blended with prominent AI-generated content providers such as Anthropic and ChatGPT. Think of it as an intelligent partner who speaks like you.

Magic of rewriting: You’ve got an AI-made text that appears soulless? Just put it in the WriteHuman software by ensuring vital words are enclosed in braces to protect them and press “rewrite”. And voila! Your text turns out to be looking genuinely human.

What is The Essence of WriteHuman?

WriteHuman has become a true symbol of modernism from where it started as an innovative idea in regards to AI-generated articles. The core objective of the software is bridging the gap between human creativity and artificial intelligence capabilities thereby allowing users to transform AI-generated text into undetectable human language.

Through this product, writers can generate contents that outperform AI detection which will create high rankings on search engine optimization as well as visibility.

WriteHuman AI Features: Why Choose WriteHuman?

WriteHuman boasts many unique features that differentiate it from other products in the field of AI privacy:

Unmatched Rewriting Power

WriteHuman doesn’t just rewrite; it reassembles meaning in sentences thus posing a challenge to AI discriminator systems. So, your secret sauce remains top secret.

Total Bypass Guarantee (AI Humanizer)

Afraid that Turnitin or GPTZero might detect your machine-generated content? No need to worry! You can always use protective brackets as well as rewriting tactics provided by WriteHuman to stay out of sight.

User-Friendly Interface

In-built AI Detector

The WriteHuman AI software has an inbuilt AI detector that gives you a human score of your content output.

How to Humanize AI articles using WriteHuman?

I wanted this article to be practical. So, I created two AI-generated articles using ChatGPT 3.5 and Perplexity AI. Below are the results of the article before and after humanization.

You can find the actual ChatGPT and Perplexity AI output and their humanized version on this Google doc.

Get 50% OFF

What are the Benefits of Embracing WriteHuman AI?

Privacy protection is just one advantage among several others offered by WriteHuman:

Artistic Freedom: By bypassing AI detection, users can enjoy artistic freedom via WriteHuman thus enabling them to be more creative without limitations.

Effortless Copywriting: It helps change texts generated by machines into readable human-like writing making copywriting easy and efficient.

WriteHuman Pricing Plans

Here are the pricing plans for WriteHuman, an AI tool that helps to make your text more human-like so it doesn’t appear like it was generated by a machine:

WriteHuman Ultra:

Best for power users.

$72 per month.

Unlimited requests.

Each request can be up to 3000 words.

Access to the Enhanced Model

Priority customer support included.

WriteHuman Pro:

Ideal for most users.

$12 per month.

200 requests per month.

Each request can be up to 1200 words.

Access to the Enhanced Model

Priority customer support included

WriteHuman Basic Plan

Suitable for light users.

$9 per month.

Allows 80 requests per month.

Each request can be up to 600 words.

Provides access to the Enhanced Model (basic customer support).

Not prepared to commit? You can submit 3 free requests per month as a user, with each being up to 200 words.

Related: Kadence AI Review

Who Can Benefit from WriteHuman?

Let us break it down:

1. Bloggers

Authenticity Matters: You’ve managed to come up with a top-quality blog post through the use of automated writing services but it has no spirit at all in it Put into WriteHuman for removal of robotic tone plus maintaining SEO quality.

Engage Your Readers: Authentic content keeps readers coming back. Striking that balance is where WriteHuman comes in handy.

2. Businesses

Marketing Materials: Although they may sound cold, marketing materials written by AI are effective. WriteHuman adds warmth and authenticity to your brand messaging.

Reputation Protection: Do not fall into the trap of using generic AI language. Your company’s reputation will remain intact as long as you are using WriteHuman.

[zerogpt-com]

ZeroGPT - Accurate Chat GPT, GPT4 & AI Text Detector Tool

Detect chatGPT content for Free, simple way & High accuracy. OpenAI detection tool, ai essay detector for teacher. Plagiarism detector for AI generated text

Straightforward and Trustworthy Open artificial intelligence and Troubadour identifier apparatus Free of charge

A huge number of clients trust ZeroGPT, See what sets ZeroGPT separated

Feature sentences distinguished as simulated intelligence/GPT

Featured Sentences

Each sentence composed by simulated intelligence is featured, with a measure showing the level of man-made intelligence inside the message

Bunch records handling behind the scenes

Bunch Documents Transfer

Basically transfer various documents immediately, and they will get really taken a look at naturally in the dashboard

High exactness computer based intelligence text recognition model

High Precision Model

Progressed and premium model, prepared on all dialects to give profoundly exact outcomes

Naturally created pdf report

Created Report

Ai content detector - Naturally created .pdf reports for each recognition, utilized as a proof of computer based intelligence Free copyright infringement

High Exactness man-made intelligence Identification in all dialects

Support All Dialects

Support every one of the dialects with the most elevated precision pace of location

Open development potential with our Programming interface

Our group has fostered an easy to understand Programming interface for associations. Get Programming interface access

Profound Investigate

DeepAnalyse™ Innovation

A spearheading research in the displaying of man-made intelligence content identification

Our simulated intelligence discovery model incorporates a few parts that examine text to decide its starting point and in the event that it was composed by man-made intelligence. We utilize a multi-stage strategy intended to streamline exactness while limiting bogus up-sides and negatives. From the full scale level to the miniature one, this is the means by which DeepAnalyse™ Innovation works. Our model has some expertise in distinguishing artificial intelligence created content like Visit GPT, GPT 3, GPT 4, Minstrel, LLaMa models …

At last, we utilize an exhaustive profound learning system, prepared on broad text assortments from the web, instructive datasets, and our exclusive engineered man-made intelligence datasets created utilizing different language models.

Website: - https://www.zerogpt.com/

[askforaprovider]

ByPaiss Review 2023

WHAT IS ByPaiss?

ByPaiss Is The FIRST And ONLY Platform on JVZOO That Allows You To Create DOCTORATE-Quality AI Content That Is FULLY-Undetectable To Any and ALL “AI Content Scanners”

WATCH THIS >>VIDEO HERE>>FOR AN FULLY EXPLAINED VIDEO BY JOSHUA ZAMORA!!!!

DID YOU ENJOY THE ABOVE VIDEO? >>CLICK <<HERE FOR A BONUS!!!

Have You Heard The RUMORS?

AI Content is more accessible than EVER right now, right? Literally, ANYONE has ChatGPT, GPT-4, GPT-3, etc at their fingertips to be able to quickly and easily create content for just about ANY niche and any language they’d like.

It’s become so easy and so popular that EVERYONE is starting to use it…

But with that popularity, comes trouble. And also starts to spark the RUMORS…

Rumors like “Will Google Penalize AI Content?”

When these rumors started circling, A TON of marketers started to PANIC! And for GOOD reason - many of us have SEEN this movie series WAY too many times already LOL

However, thankfully, Google has come out and said that they will NOT be penalizing website owners who are using AI Content (YET!)

However, thankfully, Google has come out and said that they will NOT be penalizing website owners who are using AI Content (YET!)

That’s a BIG "YET". Although they have officially published that they will NOT penalize AI content, they HAVE said that they are STILL putting QUALITY of content ABOVE ALL - which kinda leaves some wiggle room for them to move around when deciding what is QUALITY AI content and what is NOT.

HAPPY? REMEMBER TO >>GRAB HERE<<

We Have NO Idea What Google Will Decide To Do Tomorrow, Next Week, Or Next Year As AI Content Grows And Starts To Be Used A Lot More.

Think about it…

At one point in SEO Time:

Duplicate/PLR Content Worked Well - Then Google penalized it

Spun Content worked well - Then Google penalized it

MASS/Spam Link-Building Worked well - Then Google penalized it

PBN/Link Farms Worked well - Then Google penalized it

ANYTIME they see something working for us marketers, they PENALIZE it!

HAPPY? REMEMBER TO >>GRAB HERE<<

So We’ve Decided To Build A Platform That Is 100% Immune To ANY AI Content Penalties So That You Can Confidently Build and Grow Your Business Using AI Content

Once You Get Access To Our Platform, You’ll Be Able To:

Instantly Turn ANY AI Content Into FULLY-Undetectable AI Content in a matter of SECONDS so you’re building a business on a SOLID foundation!

Bypass the MOST advanced AI Detectors On the Market

INSTANTLY Transform basic AI content into Human-Like, keywords-rich Content that ranks high in the search engines!

Never Worry About The Possibility Of Getting “Penalized” By the search engines by ensuring NO ONE will EVER be able to detect you’ve used AI

Know What It Feels Like To Have COMPLETE Freedom In Your Content Creation!

Turn Ordinary AI Content into College or Doctorate Level Content And Skyrocket Your Credibility

Be Able To CHARGE More for your services because you can control how ADVANCED your AI content will be.

HAPPY? REMEMBER TO >>GRAB HERE<<

Our PROVEN, High-Converting Funnel

ByPaiss Sales Funnel and Commissions

FRONT END

ByPaiss Agency

The FE is going to be our main ByPaiss software.

With our most popular level, they’ll be able to have 10,000 words rewritten for them.

That is a WHOLE lot of content they can have BOOSTED for such a low price.

HAPPY? REMEMBER TO >>GRAB HERE<<

OTO 1

ByPaiss Agency+

Upgrade 1 is going to be our ByPaiss PLUS subscription. 

ByPaiss is a word-based system, so here you will be able to lock in your monthly package at the launch price discount and get up to 50,000 words PER month rewritten for you.

Plus, you just have to put down $1 for the first 14 days and then $47/m thereafter. You’ll be getting 5x the amount of credits every month too. This SKYROCKETS the value of this offer and we may NEVER offer this again.

HAPPY? REMEMBER TO >>GRAB HERE<<

OTO 2

ByPaiss Plugin Unlimited + Whitelabel

Upgrade #2 will be our WP BOOSTER System. This is going to take our Plugin BONUS to the NEXT level. Here you’ll be able to unlock our UNLIMITED Sites license to our WP plugin that will automatically Improve, Rewrite and Update ALL The EXISTING Content on Your Sites.

PLUS, you’ll be getting WHITELABEL rights to this plugin as well so that no one will ever know that you’re using ByPaiss to boost your traffic and rankings.

This will be a one-time payment of $197.

HAPPY? REMEMBER TO >>GRAB HERE<<

OTO 3

AiutoBlogger WP Plugin 10 Site License

Upgrade #3 will a special discount sale for our AiutoBlogger WP Plugin.

This is our Auto Blogging WP Plugin That Leverages REAL A.I To Write, Optimize and Post 100% Unique Content in ANY Niche On Complete AutopilOT.

And this works PERFECTLY with our ByPaiss system. Our ByPaiss system BOOSTS your EXISTING content, and AiutoBlogger will handle ALL of your NEW content!

HAPPY? REMEMBER TO >>GRAB HERE<<

[cristinadguzman]

ContentDetector.AI identifies any written text material that is AI generated, including Chat GPT, GPT 3, and GPT 4 written content, and delivers an estimated percentage score based on the likelihood that the text content was generated by AI tools or software. In addition to that, it can count words and is completely free to use.

This online AI content detector is not only easy to use but also has a lot of functionality and most importantly, it's a free AI content detector. It is a ChatGPT plagiarism detector, a GPT 3 content detector, GPT 4 content detector, and a Jarvis AI content detector. You only need to copy and paste the content into the text field to check.

Thousands of users like our application, and it is used by bloggers and academics to identify any article containing AI-generated stuff.