#dissertation vs research paper

[thesisproposal1]

Thesis For Research Paper – How To Find A Good Thesis Topic

This is a short preview of the article: Students writing a research paper must create a thesis statement. In this part of the essay, they write the key objective of their work. What does the thesis for research paper include? It includes a statement and some arguments. Students should first check the information they find regarding the

If you like it consider checking out the full version of the post at: Thesis For Research Paper – How To Find A Good Thesis Topic

If you are looking for ideas for tweet or re-blog this post you may want to consider the following hashtags:

Hashtags: #DissertationVsResearchPaper, #HowToWriteThesisStatementInResearchPaper, #IsThesisAndResearchPaperTheSame, #ThesisExamplesForResearchPapers, #ThesisOrResearchPaper, #ThesisToResearchPaper, #ThesisVsResearchPaper

The Hashtags of the Categories are: #Thesis

Thesis For Research Paper – How To Find A Good Thesis Topic is available at the following link: https://research-degree-thesis.com/thesis-for-research-paper-how-to-find-a-good-thesis-topic/ You will find more information, stories, examples, data, opinions as part of a collection of articles that will help you in writing your thesis, your proposal or your scientific research.

The title of the full article is: Thesis For Research Paper – How To Find A Good Thesis Topic

It belong to the following categories: Thesis

The most relevant keywords are: dissertation vs research paper, how to write thesis statement in research paper, is thesis and research paper the same, thesis examples for research papers, thesis or research paper, thesis to research paper, thesis vs research paper

It has been published by Thesis-Proposal-Admin at Thesis Proposal a blog about thesis, proposal, research and all you need for delivering your academic work with efficiency and quality

Students writing a research paper must create a thesis statement. In this part of the essay, they write the key objective of their work. What does the thesis for research paper include? It includes a statement and some arguments. Students should first check the information they find regarding the

Thesis proposal, hope that you will find it interesting and that it will help you in your journey

Students writing a research paper must create a thesis statement. In this part of the essay, they write the key objective of their work. What does the thesis for research paper include? It includes a statement and some arguments. Students should first check the information they find regarding the topic and add an opinion in […]

[dissertationthesis]

Thesis Vs Dissertation Vs Research Paper: Know the Difference.

If you are a student pursuing a Master's or a Doctorate it is essential to learn the differences between Thesis, Dissertation, and Research paper. All these terms can look similar yet they hold distinct meanings. Understanding the difference eases the struggles of working on one of these.  At the end of this article, you will be able to differentiate all three.

What is a thesis?

A thesis can simply imply a summary of the research findings you have been working on, all through the Master's and Doctorate. 

This serves as a project that showcases students' abilities and skills acquired throughout the program it provides information on their unique research, argument, and hypothesis. Also, it supports and proves research based on evidence and relevant resources. 

When it comes to Thesis Vs Dissertation thesis is shorter than a dissertation and contains up to 80 to 100 pages.

What is a dissertation?

A dissertation is often a project worked on by doctorate students. It requires comprehensive and in-depth research. It signifies the highest level of research and contributes to the field of study.

It often demands extensive research that finds a solution to a certain problem or a question, Data collection, Interpretation, and an extensive literature review. They must be unique and original with the ability to produce new insights.

Thus it is much more impactful in the field, It is almost like a whole book consisting of 300 to 500 pages.

When we compare a Dissertation Vs Research paper, Dissertation is deeper and takes more effects to create. 

Research Paper vs Thesis.

All three Thesis research papers and dissertations are a part of academic documentation, they all serve different purposes. 

Thesis and Dissertation test the ability of students to conduct an independent research project and requires originality to solve unique problems that are never touched before. It is also required to go through a rigorous review process with the committee of industry experts to be approved. 

Whereas a research paper just shares research findings, analysis, and insights with the wider academic community.

Another crucial difference we could find with the comparison of Research Paper vs Thesis, or Research vs Dissertation is that dissertation and thesis demand more originality but a research paper can be created with existing research findings or proving perspectives.

Thus to sum up the major differences when it comes to dissertation vs thesis vs research articles it is in the length and primarily the originality of the research and the process of review. Hope now you would have got clarity on what is what. Here at United Innovators, we provide you with research guidance and writing services. Visit our website and contact us for more information.

For more Info visit here - https://www.unitedinnovator.com/thesis-writing-for-postgraduates.php

[regulusrules]

Hi! Don't feel obligated to reply to this if you don't wanna answer for any reason, but I saw you answer an ask where you said you archived a fic so you could use it in your personal career and I was wondering what that would be? Like, in what ways can you use fic like that? Again, don't feel like you have to answer if that's a more personal question than I think it is and you want to keep it private 😊

Hi, no worries! Thank you for being very respectful about it 🤍 I think I understand where this question is coming from. We often confine fanfiction to only being a creative outlet with no other usage, when actually it can have a great impact on other aspects of our lives.

I'll list you some of the ways:

If you're an author, you can use your fics by restructuring them into original works of art. (This is generally the most common case, but it involves losing your non-profitable voice. However, there are other ways you could benefit from your fics without monetizing them).

If you're an academic scholar, you can use fanfiction in the fields of literature, interdisciplinarity, creative writing, and linguistics. Whether this may be writing a research paper / thesis / dissertation about fanfiction as a genre, or analysing fics themselves. People really underestimate the power of fanfiction on academia and vice versa.

If you're applying for postgraduate studies in some of the previously mentioned fields, some universities require a portfolio of your creative writing. You can tailor your fics and include them as samples.

In your postgraduate journey, you can exercise applying critical literary theories (eg: feminist theory, postcolonial theory, etc) on fics if you're reluctant to start straight on books. I even like to believe that critical writing is in itself a form of fic writing, because you're writing and trying to prove your opinion about an outer text. Only difference is that critical writing is evidence-based.

You could do comparative studies on books and fics to further understand the workings of monetized vs unprompted writing, the difference in style, or even the use of diction.

If you're applying for certain jobs in the writing field aka content writing / copywriting / script writing.. some companies also require a creative writing portfolio.

All of these are ways you could benefit from fic writing, aside from the obvious which is writing for your good self and evolving your style. I said it before and will keep on saying it: fanfiction is one of the purest forms of love out there. We write fics because we want to share our love of certain characters with the world without a need to financially gain anything from it. It is a small restoration of human goodness and human connection. However, that doesn't say you can't use it for anything else. Quite the contrary, when you understand the power of your words and the influence they could make, this will be the greatest pro of all

[i-write-hurt-not-comfort]

no brain space for nice things so how about. an opportunity to ramble about pharmacology. i’m listening

hello and thank you! nothing particular comes to mind as of late so i thought i'd talk about my dissertation that i did in my third year.

the title was "The importance of dose: a systematic review of gabapentin and amitriptyline doses used in pre-clinical chronic pain models and their clinical relevance" and i scored 72 on it in the end. maybe that doesn't sound that high to international students but at universities in the UK, anything over 70 is a first which is the highest grade you can get. so 72 vs 92 would still be the same grade, hence i was happy with a 72. it may be just barely over 70, but it's a first.

it's a shame my other units were a bit shit and overall i only got 65. which is a 2:1 (second highest grade) but i wasn't happy :(

anyway i'll put this under the cut because it'll probably be long.

i guess i gotta make this kinda simple to explain but basically, when we're making new drugs to treat chronic pain, which is what we (i mean my project partner, supervisor and i) chose to focus on, we have to use animal models to test whether they work. unfortunately there's not many rodent models of chronic neuropathic pain which translate to humans effectively, which is why having translatable behavioural tests of pain is really important!!

some of these include hot plate test, tail flick test, hargreeves test etc. all of these basically test how long it takes for a rodent to respond to painful stimuli (thermal or mechanical usually). if a drug targeting pain is effective, the time to respond to this pain will increase, and that's kind of how we measure if drugs work.

so amitriptyline and gabapentin are two drugs used to treat chronic pain. they're both widely used in humans and because of that, they're used as comparison drugs when we're tested novel compounds. let's say we have compound X (i'll use this as a hypothetical novel drug throughout this post), we test it in a rodent and also test amitriptyline or gabapentin, and then we compare how well they work. if drug X works as well as GBP or AMT, then we can assume it might work well in humans too. below is how GBP and AMT work, if you wanna know.

this all seems kind of simple, right? just use the dose of AMT and GBP we use in humans which is adapted to rodents' metabolism (in milligrams per kilogram of weight, or mg/kg), right?

that'd be great if that's what happens, but it's not! why? good question! the process behind this review was screening a large number of papers and extracting the doses used and comparing them to what should have been used according to this paper. the process of deciding what papers to screen looked like this.

we extracted the following data from a total of 314 papers for GBP and 93 papers for AMT. yeah, it took a REALLY long time.

the other stuff beyond dose was also analysed to gauge the general quality of pre-clinical studies, but that gets really technical and i won't go into that today. long story short, a lot of these studies are slacking in quality parameters such as randomisation and blinding.

based on preliminary research, we thought that the majority of studies would be using doses MUCH higher than the translatable dose. here's the table for the doses which should've been used.

mice and rats are smaller, hence their metabolism is faster, so they need higher doses. the doses which should be used in animal models is the starting dose because y'know, that's what we start with in humans. so, we collated the mass of data and made two stunning lil graphs.

it's... pretty fascinating, right? the majority of pre-clinical studies are using comparative doses of AMT and GBP which are WAAAAY off what we use in humans. we also did tests into effect size (won't show the forest plots here because they're complicated) and found that these animal studies were extracting much larger effect sizes than what we see in humans. that means that the doses being really high DOES influence the data we get in animals, and it's making it harder to translate those results to humans.

you might think, "well, that's fine. big doses mean big responses, so that makes sense", and you'd be correct, but for the wrong reasons, and this is where the really juicy pharmacology comes in.

it's very rare that drugs have only one target. well, i'm not sure that ever happens. that's why most drugs have side effects at higher doses (or even at therapeutic doses). in the diagram higher up of the mechanism of action of AMT and GBP, you can see that both of them have off-target effects (in red).

a core pharmacology concept is that as drug concentration increases, the occupancy at receptors also increases. so with higher doses comes increased engagement of the receptors which we don't want to stimulate. and this can have an impact on some responses, even in pain studies!

for example, AMT can have up to 100% occupancy at histamine 1 receptors (H1) at higher doses. histamine antagonism causes sedation, therefore animal studies with 10 times the required dose of AMT may be measuring responses associated with sedation rather than analgesia. if AMT is being used in a comparative pre-clinical for say, drug X, then drug X's effects are being held against responses which really have nothing to do with humans in the clinic.

AMT has a lot more off-target effects than GBP, whereas GBP is quite specific. we proposed that this is why GBP studies don't have to use as relatively high doses compared to AMT, because off-target effects aren't required to observe measurable analgesic responses.

there's a lot more gritty technicalities, nuances and even ethical considerations behind this study we conducted. it was 6k words in total, so this is a really brief overview. but if you were interested in what i spent months and months working on, here it is.

[helpforthesis]

Role of Editing and Proofreading in Research Writing Assistance

Role of Editing and Proofreading in Research Writing Assistance

Research Writing Services is a rigorous and demanding process that culminates in the creation of a paper, thesis, or dissertation that must communicate complex ideas clearly and concisely. After countless hours spent researching, drafting, and revising, it can be tempting to submit the final draft without further review. However, the crucial steps of editing and proofreading are vital to ensuring the quality, accuracy, and professionalism of the final piece. These processes can elevate the clarity of your argument, correct technical errors, and make your work more persuasive to your audience.

In this blog, we will delve into the role of editing and proofreading in research writing assistance, highlighting why they are essential and offering practical strategies for incorporating them into your writing process.

Editing vs. Proofreading: What’s the Difference?

Though editing and proofreading are often discussed together, they are distinct stages in the writing process that serve different purposes.

Why Editing and Proofreading are Crucial in Research Writing

1. Clarity and Precision of Ideas

Editing plays a critical role in enhancing the clarity of your arguments and ensuring that your readers can follow your line of reasoning. Research writing often involves dense, technical language, so refining sentences to be clear and concise can prevent misinterpretations or confusion. Moreover, during the editing process, you can eliminate redundancy, clarify ambiguous points, and refine your language to convey your ideas as precisely as possible.

Proofreading complements this by ensuring that typographical errors do not undermine the clarity of your work. Even minor mistakes, such as misplaced commas or incorrect word usage, can detract from your credibility as a researcher. Carefully proofreading your work guarantees that your language is as polished as your ideas.

2. Logical Flow and Structure

In research writing, a logical structure is key to guiding the reader through your arguments and findings. During the editing process, it’s essential to assess the organization of your paper—whether your introduction sets up the research question effectively, whether your literature review is comprehensive, whether your methodology is well-explained, and whether your conclusion ties everything together seamlessly.

Editing allows you to reorganize content, if necessary, to ensure that the flow of information is logical and coherent. This might involve restructuring paragraphs or even entire sections to better support the narrative. By doing so, you improve the readability and persuasiveness of your research.

Proofreading at this stage helps to catch any remaining inconsistencies in formatting, headings, or transitions between sections that might disrupt the flow of your paper.

3. Eliminating Errors and Enhancing Professionalism

Errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling can damage the credibility of your research. Even the most ground breaking ideas can be overshadowed by sloppy writing, distracting readers from your core arguments. Editing meticulously ensures that your paper is free from such errors, enhancing its professionalism.

Furthermore, proofreading is essential for ensuring that your work adheres to the correct academic style guide. Whether your field requires APA, MLA, Chicago, or another citation format, proofreading helps you ensure that all citations, references, and footnotes are accurate and consistent.

Practical Strategies for Editing and Proofreading

Now that we’ve established the importance of editing and proofreading, how can you effectively incorporate these steps into your research writing process? Here are some strategies to ensure that your paper is polished and professional:

Conclusion

Editing and proofreading are indispensable components of the research writing process. They ensure that your ideas are communicated clearly, your arguments are logically structured, and your paper is free of errors. By dedicating time and effort to these final stages of writing, you enhance the overall quality and professionalism of your work. Remember, even the most well-researched paper can be weakened by poor presentation, so don’t skip these crucial steps. Through careful editing and proofreading, you can ensure that your research is presented in its best possible form, contributing effectively to your field of study.

Visit Our Website: https://helpforthesis.com/writing-research-paper-service.html

[tutorsindia152]

A comparison of a literature review by ChatGPT and expert writers

ChatGPT- an innovative content generation tool

ChatGPT, an innovative content generation tool developed by OpenAI, employs machine learning algorithms to create text (Ariyaratne, 2023). Early users of ChatGPT have commended its ability to generate high-quality content, thanks to its utilization of Large Language Models (LLMs) trained on extensive data to predict the most suitable text, resulting in natural-sounding output. University students are increasingly turning to ChatGPT for assistance with assignments, literature reviews, and dissertations.

Nevertheless, several articles have raised concerns about the potential obsolescence of traditional assignments due to ChatGPT's ability to produce high-scoring papers and encourage critical thinking. The ethical and permissible boundaries of using ChatGPT in scientific writing remain uncertain (Gao, 2022).

Studies on the reliability of ChatGPT content

Research has been undertaken to rigorously assess the capabilities of chatbots in academic contexts. Yeadon et al. (2023) conducted a study evaluating ten physics essays for academic content, topic comprehension, and writing style. Their findings indicated that essays authored by AI exhibited high quality, albeit with variations similar to those found in human-written essays.

Herbold et al. (2023) compared essays produced by humans with those generated by ChatGPT, revealing that the latter yielded high-quality content, particularly in crafting argumentative essays. The AI-generated content displayed a structured format, often featuring similar introductory and concluding phrases like "Overall," "In summary," and "In conclusion." In contrast, human-written essays tended to be less structured, adhering less strictly to preset guidelines.

However, researchers have highlighted limitations of ChatGPT for academic research, notably its inability to generate original ideas, relying instead on preexisting training data. This reliance increases the risk of plagiarism significantly. Ariyaratne et al.'s 2023 study found that four out of five papers generated by ChatGPT contained errors, with one even including false references, raising concerns about the tool's authenticity in academic research. Kleebayon (2023) observed a tendency for ChatGPT to produce biased content.

ChatGPT vs Expert Writers

Liao and Sundar (2023) conducted an experiment describing the MAIN model for communication. The following is an excerpt from the study, serving as evidence that ChatGPT cannot be utilized for conducting a literature review:

“Prompt: Explain the MAIN Model by Shyam Sundar

ChatGPT: The MAIN Model, created by S. Shyam Sundar, is a theoretical framework that elucidates how individuals process and comprehend information they come across online and how the structure of digital media platforms influences this process. The abbreviation MAIN represents Media Affordances and Heuristics-based Information Processing. The model proposes that the structure of digital media platforms, particularly the technological capabilities of the platform, shapes the cognitive shortcuts that users utilize when processing information. Technological capabilities are the features and opportunities that a platform offers for users to engage with information, such as browsing, searching, and filtering. Cognitive shortcuts are mental strategies that people employ to simplify decision-making and information processing, such as the availability heuristic, the representativeness heuristic, and the affect heuristic. The MAIN model indicates that the structure of digital media platforms impacts how individuals process information, as different capabilities and shortcuts can result in varying outcomes in information processing. For instance, a platform with robust search capabilities may prompt users to use the availability heuristic and depend on the initial results they encounter, while a platform with strong social features may prompt users to use the affect heuristic and rely on others' opinions.”

To the uninitiated, the response appears correct. However, specialists in the field can discern its accuracy. Similarly, if a student solely references ChatGPT without consulting academic literature for their literature review, they may misinterpret concepts, potentially negatively impacting their review.

Furthermore, scholars argue that it is unethical to utilize ChatGPT for literature reviews and other academic research endeavors when it cannot serve as a co-author (Haman, 2023).

Here is the content for the MAIN model, written by a human:

The MAIN model, conceptualized by Shyam Sundar, is an acronym representing the four primary functions of media that can have psychological impacts on the audience: Modality (M), Agency (A), Interactivity (I), and Navigability (N). While the source and content of digital media are vital in establishing perceived credibility, the MAIN model emphasizes the technological attributes of digital media that can shape judgments of credibility.

Modality pertains to the format of the media and is the most visible aspect. It closely aligns with the notion of medium because traditionally, media exhibit different modalities, with print primarily textual, radio auditory, and television audiovisual. Agency, or the agent, serves as the origin, particularly on a psychological level, especially in the absence of another attributed source for specific information. Interactivity encompasses both interaction and activity. It also suggests that the medium is responsive to user input and capable of adapting to variations in user engagement. Through the provision of navigation tools, such as steering wheels, the interface can foster a sense of self-direction in users. Contemporary media offer users numerous choices for how to access and navigate through a mediated environment (Sundar, 2015).

Conclusion

ChatGPT is an Artificial Intelligence tool based on Large Language Models, trained to generate content resembling human writing. It has garnered considerable attention for its ability to produce content. Studies have demonstrated ChatGPT's capability to generate organized essays. However, there have been concerns regarding the reliability of sources, potential plagiarism, and content quality. A comparison between ChatGPT-generated content and human-authored content reveals inaccuracies in ChatGPT's output. Thus, students should approach its use for assignments and dissertations with caution. Nonetheless, ChatGPT can still be beneficial for structuring content.

About Tutors India

At Tutors India, we are a team of academic researchers and writers who assist students with writing a literature review. Our team is diverse, enabling us to guide students specialising in various disciplines. We ensure selecting articles from reputed journals and abide by the university guidelines for assignments, essays and dissertations. Moreover, we proofread and edit the content, ensuring the review is error- and plagiarism-free.

To know more about how a literature review is written in various fields, check out our literature review examples.

[myproassignmenthelp]

Unveiling the Secrets of Research Paper Writing Services

The academic journey can be demanding, with students often facing the daunting task of completing research papers and assignments that require substantial time and expertise. As a result, many students turn to research paper writing services to seek professional assistance. In this blog, we'll delve into the world of research paper writing services, exploring what they are, why students use them, and the ethical considerations involved.

What Are Research Paper Writing Services?

Research paper writing services are online platforms or companies that offer academic writing assistance to students at various educational levels, from high school to postgraduate studies. These services provide customized research papers, essays, theses, dissertations, and other academic content, often delivered on a deadline specified by the client.

Why Do Students Use Research Paper Writing Services?

Time Constraints: Many students juggle multiple responsibilities, including part-time jobs, family commitments, and extracurricular activities. Writing a research paper can be time-consuming, and some students opt for professional help to meet deadlines without compromising their other obligations.

Complex Topics: Research papers often involve intricate subjects that require extensive research and in-depth analysis. Students may lack the necessary expertise in a specific field and turn to experts for well-researched and comprehensive papers.

Language Barriers: International students, whose first language may not be English, may struggle with language proficiency when it comes to academic writing. Research paper writing services can help bridge this gap by providing papers with high-quality English.

Academic Pressure: The pressure to excel academically can be overwhelming, and some students resort to research paper writing services as a means of ensuring high grades and maintaining a competitive edge.

Ethical Considerations

While quality research paper writing services offer valuable assistance, their use raises ethical questions. Here are some factors to consider:

Plagiarism: Submitting work obtained from a research paper writing service without proper citation is considered plagiarism, a serious academic offense. It's essential for students to use these services as a learning tool rather than a shortcut.

Academic Integrity: Students should uphold the principles of academic integrity. Using a research paper writing service to deceive instructors or institutions is unethical and can result in severe consequences.

Learning vs. Grades: It's crucial to strike a balance between seeking help to improve one's understanding of a subject and using these services solely to achieve high grades.

Disclosure: Some institutions have strict policies regarding the use of research paper writing services. It's important to be aware of these policies and disclose any assistance received when required.

Tips for Using Research Paper Writing Services Ethically

Collaboration: Collaborate with the service provider and communicate your specific needs and expectations clearly. This ensures that the paper aligns with your academic goals.

Use as a Reference: Treat the paper as a reference or a model to guide your own writing. Study the structure, research methods, and citation styles used in the paper to enhance your own skills.

Proper Citation: If you incorporate content from the paper into your work, make sure to cite it properly. Acknowledge the assistance received from the writing service.

Proofread and Edit: Review and edit the paper to ensure it reflects your own voice and style. This step is crucial in avoiding plagiarism and maintaining academic integrity.

Research paper writing help can provide valuable support to students facing academic challenges, but their use must be approached with ethical considerations in mind. When used responsibly, these services can serve as a tool for improving one's understanding of a subject and enhancing writing skills. Ultimately, the key is to strike a balance between seeking help and maintaining academic integrity, ensuring that the academic journey remains a meaningful and enriching experience.

[edamba]

DISSERTATION VS. THESIS: SIMILARITIES AND INSIGHTS

Embarking on a graduate degree journey, whether it's a master's or a doctoral program, brings exciting challenges and opportunities for academic growth. As you strive to become an expert in your field, coursework, research, and projects take center stage. Among the important milestones in many graduate programs is the completion of a thesis or dissertation. Although these terms are often used interchangeably, they have unique similarities and differences.

In this article, we'll explore the similarities of thesis and dissertation to offer clarity to PhD students and those aspiring to pursue advanced degrees.

What is Thesis?

A thesis is the pinnacle of PhD journey, representing the culmination of your research and intellectual growth. It is a scholarly document that demonstrates your expertise in a specific field by addressing a well-defined research question and contributes new knowledge as well as insights to the academic community. It requires thorough literature review, meticulous data collection, and robust methodology.

Read more here for helpful tips on writing your PhD thesis.

What is a dissertation?

A dissertation, unlike a thesis, is a more extensive and comprehensive research project that is typically required for a doctoral degree. It serves as the final requirement for earning a Ph.D., requiring submission and defense. This document encompasses all the details of your original or expanded research on a new or existing topic. As a Ph.D. candidate, your dissertation showcases your expertise and contributions to the field, demonstrating your ability to conduct independent research.

Dissertation vs thesis: Key Similarities

Final Projects: Both a thesis and a dissertation serve as final projects that are required for graduation from their respective programs. They represent a student's academic journey.

Understanding: Both require a deep and accurate understanding of the research problem, showing the candidate's ability to engage critically with the subject matter.

Specific Research Questions: Both forms of scholarly written pieces must address specific research questions. They require a clear focus and aim to contribute new insights or expand on existing knowledge.

Academic Writing Skills: Academic writing skills are imperative for a thesis as well as a dissertation. Both require adherence to proper citation styles, formatting guidelines, and academic conventions.

Ethical Practices: Ethical practices must be followed while collecting and documenting research data. Both demand integrity in handling and reporting research findings.

Plagiarism Avoidance: Plagiarism is not accepted in either thesis or dissertation. Originality and proper citation of sources are essential to maintain academic integrity.

Analytical Skills: Both use analytical skills to support the findings and arguments presented. Students must demonstrate their ability to critically analyze data and draw valid conclusions.

Defense and Completion: A student has to defend both the completed thesis and the dissertation to obtain their degree. Successful defense is necessary to demonstrate the mastery of the subject matter.

Topic Selection: Both require students to choose a topic for research and create a comprehensive work that demonstrates their skills and knowledge acquired during their studies.

Structure and Format: Both have a similar structure and format, typically including an introduction, literature review, methodology, findings, and conclusion.

Proposal Requirement: Students writing a dissertation or thesis often need to create a proposal before starting the final paper. The proposal introduces the main aim and objectives of the forthcoming document.

Delving into the nuances of a thesis and dissertation is essential for PhD students. As you embark on your academic journey, remember to stay informed and seek clarity on the requirements of your program. And for those seeking a unique opportunity, consider participating in the prestigious EDAMBA Doctoral Thesis Competition. Take your research to new heights and showcase your expertise on a global platform.

[bestassignmentexp]

What Are The Five Parts of a Dissertation?

In order to understand what a dissertation is and how it is structured, you first need to know the five major parts that make up a dissertation. A dissertation is a type of academic writing that is typically much longer than a typical research paper. It contains five major parts, which are the introduction, literature review, methodology, results, and conclusions.

Introduction

In the introduction, the writer often provides a background on what topic they are writing about, who has done research in that area, and what is currently known. This part also generally includes a discussion of how relevant their research is. The introduction often provides background information on the topic, who has done research on it and what is currently known. It often includes an explanation of how the article will be organized and a definition of key terms.

Literature Review

The literature review is where the writer reviews all of the previous literature related to their topic or project. They will analyze what other studies have been done and outline some of their main findings in order to figure out how their study stands out from previous ones. References for this section can include books, journal articles, newspaper articles, and surveys among others. The literature review is an important part of the paper and should be complete in its scope.

Methodology

The methodology section of a research paper covers the key components of the study: what was done and how it was done. The methods section begins with a brief overview of the study, followed by an explanation of how the data were collected, what analyses were made, and what other sources were consulted. The discussion then moves on to describe the potential limitations of this study, as well as its strengths and shortcomings. The final paragraph of these sections is where conclusions are drawn from all that has been stated thus far.

Results

In this section, the results are presented. Results are not always based on quantitative data, such as averages or percentages. They can also be qualitative, such as describing a personal experience or linking to a supporting source. This section should be organized by topic; for example, if the research paper is focused on developing an assessment of self-care practices and outcomes related to cancer patients' treatment satisfaction and quality of life (QOL), this part of the paper would include findings about cancer patients' experiences with QOL, self-care practices measuring satisfaction with treatment delivery and satisfaction with cancer care overall.

Conclusion

This section summarizes the findings of the research paper and draws conclusions from them. The paper will examine how cancer patient's experiences, satisfaction with care delivery, and QOL are related to self-care practices. This study will also compare these factors in terms of patient age, gender, treatment type (medical oncology vs. surgical oncology), individual's experience with a life-threatening illness, or personal history of cancer (yes/no). Explore whether or not there is a pattern whereby the time to death has an effect on patients' levels of satisfaction and QOL.

Finally, this study will evaluate whether or not the preceding factors are related to cancer patients' self-care practices. The study found that satisfaction and QOL levels are more likely to be high in older patients, those who have had a personal history of cancer, and those who have had a life-threatening illness. Furthermore, this study found that time spent with family members and time spent as an outpatient is related to individuals' satisfaction with care delivery.

A thesis statement is a single sentence that captures the meaning of your entire piece. It is a short, clear sentence that summarizes your main argument with a specific claim. An expert assignment help service can be so beneficial for student for getting A+ grades. A good thesis statement has all five parts and it is structured in such a way that one part comes after the other in an orderly manner.

[ybspost]

Differences between Quantitative Research and Qualitative Research

https://youtu.be/gsfJy-byZmA

How to select research methodology

https://youtu.be/AxOSkq7ZbS8

How to Write a Research Article

https://youtu.be/X3thGQPPtf8

Differences Between Theoretical Implications and Practical Implications

https://youtu.be/z7CwGu00c4w

Differences Between Statistical Significant and Statistical Insignificant

https://youtu.be/EfAEVXt51F0

Differences between Moderator and Mediator

https://youtu.be/gwKbE_-2DfA

Basics of Literature Review | 5 Simple Steps

https://youtu.be/9w5cqeUVpZ0

How to Write a Review Article

https://youtu.be/b72N-Qu7A90

How to Analyze a Research Article

https://youtu.be/xhOg1clp1lE

How to Develop a Good Research Topic

https://youtu.be/gGdpxXBcdxY

How to write an Abstract

https://youtu.be/EWdhfgC9DLY

How to Write a Summary

https://youtu.be/Dho56HtJPXQ

How to Read a Journal Article

https://youtu.be/5VxM_PG5sb0

How to find Research Gaps

https://youtu.be/vE2HSWW9C-s

Problem Statement

https://youtu.be/98vOS9yihRA

How to add or update articles in Google Scholar ?

https://youtu.be/fTlsRufXbDw

How to Write a Strong Thesis Statement

https://youtu.be/3y4tsQwHOUY

How to identify a research gap ?

https://youtu.be/gyimuqAdYyo

Five Simple Rules to Avoid Plagiarism https://youtu.be/iBm_kj8jNZM

Differences of Useful terms used in Research Methodology

https://youtu.be/fcnKStMNvuQ

Difference between Research Methods and Research Methodology https://youtu.be/RSUfNkJFWeU

Differences between Theoretical Framework and Conceptual Framework

https://youtu.be/qXeWfhc-X0I

Differences between Reliability and Validity

https://youtu.be/yxfO-NURdgA

Differences between Review Paper vs Research Paper

https://youtu.be/t5TTqfixL2A

Data Collection Websites

https://youtu.be/fN7RXVg4Q9Q

Interpretation of Regression Analysis

https://youtu.be/E-Gd8WNa1N8

Regression Analysis with Scientific Calculator

https://youtu.be/NHYLthpxQnw

What is P Value?

https://youtu.be/eOp_VMcFM-o

How to Calculate P Value | Z Distribution

https://youtu.be/IlRC3NjORMQ

How to Calculate P Value in MS Excel | z-test

https://youtu.be/KZPagXCyZiU

How to Calculate P Value in MS Excel | t-test

https://youtu.be/rJAAoh48Enk

P-Value of t-test without software | Step by Step Guide

https://youtu.be/sSUaM2g4ods

Differences Between Critical Value Approach and P Value Approach

https://youtu.be/PVBu2b5gobM

How to Find Outliers

https://youtu.be/OWoLLqu82Uo

How to Select a Research Supervisor

https://youtu.be/zDdIDzZG0sE

Differences between Confidence Level and Significance Level

https://youtu.be/aGc9PMTy1ow

Differences Between Parametric Tests and Non-Parametric Tests

https://youtu.be/6FQT-NtLM6g

Differences Between z test and t test

https://youtu.be/fugOdf7vc_w

How to install Add-ins

https://youtu.be/yku_A6f4I78

How to select Research Topic

https://youtu.be/1QuZ0Dp9i3g

How to cite and download articles from google scholar

https://youtu.be/fwnjg7jkvwI

Differences Between Google and Google Scholar

https://youtu.be/gJFA7tZA4nU

How to publish a research article

https://youtu.be/7qlPcSk7vEo

Literature Databases

https://youtu.be/2WV0K8AaDqo

Basics of MS Excel

https://youtu.be/pbHbnHD_EyM

Research Methods For Business: A Skill Building Approach By UMA SEKARAN

https://youtu.be/lW-tYvM7Kbk

Best Books of Research for beginners

https://youtu.be/OeACYQwcgvU

Best Academic Paper Writing Books

https://youtu.be/c3aB7rI2mv8

How to Convert Word to PDF | Without Software or Internet

https://youtu.be/_ITupCafSyk

How to Convert PDF to word | Without Software or Internet

https://youtu.be/5BzZGghbFJw

Guidelines for Writing a Thesis or Dissertation

https://youtu.be/JIumBcr21yU

How to write the introduction?

https://youtu.be/S-koanSBMOY

MCQs on Research Methodology

Important for all Competitive Examinations

https://youtu.be/xKh3SLWweWs

Research Proposal Presentation Speech

https://youtu.be/RO_V_UQ9NPE

Article Writing Pros and Cons

https://youtu.be/HUYybGlHGEU

History of Gold Prices in Pakistan

https://y2u.be/F3-jAfeO5Hc

Source: Thesis Helper

[thesisproposal1]

Thesis For Research Paper – How To Find A Good Thesis Topic

This is a short preview of the article: Students writing a research paper must create a thesis statement. In this part of the essay, they write the key objective of their work. What does the thesis for research paper include? It includes a statement and some arguments. Students should first check the information they find regarding the

If you like it consider checking out the full version of the post at: Thesis For Research Paper – How To Find A Good Thesis Topic

If you are looking for ideas for tweet or re-blog this post you may want to consider the following hashtags:

Hashtags: #DissertationVsResearchPaper, #HowToWriteThesisStatementInResearchPaper, #IsThesisAndResearchPaperTheSame, #ThesisExamplesForResearchPapers, #ThesisOrResearchPaper, #ThesisToResearchPaper, #ThesisVsResearchPaper

The Hashtags of the Categories are: #Thesis

Thesis For Research Paper – How To Find A Good Thesis Topic is available at the following link: https://thesis-proposal.com/thesis-for-research-paper-how-to-find-a-good-thesis-topic/ You will find more information, stories, examples, data, opinions as part of a collection of articles that will help you in writing your thesis, your proposal or your scientific research.

The title of the full article is: Thesis For Research Paper – How To Find A Good Thesis Topic

It belong to the following categories: Thesis

The most relevant keywords are: dissertation vs research paper, how to write thesis statement in research paper, is thesis and research paper the same, thesis examples for research papers, thesis or research paper, thesis to research paper, thesis vs research paper

It has been published by Thesis-Proposal-Admin at Thesis Proposal a blog about thesis, proposal, research and all you need for delivering your academic work with efficiency and quality

Students writing a research paper must create a thesis statement. In this part of the essay, they write the key objective of their work. What does the thesis for research paper include? It includes a statement and some arguments. Students should first check the information they find regarding the

Thesis proposal, hope that you will find it interesting and that it will help you in your journey

Students writing a research paper must create a thesis statement. In this part of the essay, they write the key objective of their work. What does the thesis for research paper include? It includes a statement and some arguments. Students should first check the information they find regarding the topic and add an opinion in […]

[beholdingslut]

did you know that ac odyssey has a 10$ tour version where you walk around alexandria and they tell you facts. my egyptology professor showed it to us once for class. we only have class once a week and she showed us 40 minutes of assassins creed gameplay

i did not know thissssss fuck. you release a pretty, decently researched game and ancient history profs worldwide lose their minds. last year it came up in one of my honours paper for like 20 minutes plus another student did their dissertation on aspasia in ac odyssey vs. classical reception.

[helpforthesis]

Research Writing Services

Role of Editing and Proofreading in Research Writing Assistance

Research Writing Services is a rigorous and demanding process that culminates in the creation of a paper, thesis, or dissertation that must communicate complex ideas clearly and concisely. After countless hours spent researching, drafting, and revising, it can be tempting to submit the final draft without further review. However, the crucial steps of editing and proofreading are vital to ensuring the quality, accuracy, and professionalism of the final piece. These processes can elevate the clarity of your argument, correct technical errors, and make your work more persuasive to your audience.

In this blog, we will delve into the role of editing and proofreading in research writing assistance, highlighting why they are essential and offering practical strategies for incorporating them into your writing process.

Editing vs. Proofreading: What’s the Difference?

Though editing and proofreading are often discussed together, they are distinct stages in the writing process that serve different purposes.

Why Editing and Proofreading are Crucial in Research Writing

1. Clarity and Precision of Ideas

Editing plays a critical role in enhancing the clarity of your arguments and ensuring that your readers can follow your line of reasoning. Research writing often involves dense, technical language, so refining sentences to be clear and concise can prevent misinterpretations or confusion. Moreover, during the editing process, you can eliminate redundancy, clarify ambiguous points, and refine your language to convey your ideas as precisely as possible.

Proofreading complements this by ensuring that typographical errors do not undermine the clarity of your work. Even minor mistakes, such as misplaced commas or incorrect word usage, can detract from your credibility as a researcher. Carefully proofreading your work guarantees that your language is as polished as your ideas.

2. Logical Flow and Structure

In research writing, a logical structure is key to guiding the reader through your arguments and findings. During the editing process, it’s essential to assess the organization of your paper—whether your introduction sets up the research question effectively, whether your literature review is comprehensive, whether your methodology is well-explained, and whether your conclusion ties everything together seamlessly.

Editing allows you to reorganize content, if necessary, to ensure that the flow of information is logical and coherent. This might involve restructuring paragraphs or even entire sections to better support the narrative. By doing so, you improve the readability and persuasiveness of your research.

Proofreading at this stage helps to catch any remaining inconsistencies in formatting, headings, or transitions between sections that might disrupt the flow of your paper.

3. Eliminating Errors and Enhancing Professionalism

Errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling can damage the credibility of your research. Even the most ground breaking ideas can be overshadowed by sloppy writing, distracting readers from your core arguments. Editing meticulously ensures that your paper is free from such errors, enhancing its professionalism.

Furthermore, proofreading is essential for ensuring that your work adheres to the correct academic style guide. Whether your field requires APA, MLA, Chicago, or another citation format, proofreading helps you ensure that all citations, references, and footnotes are accurate and consistent.

Practical Strategies for Editing and Proofreading

Now that we’ve established the importance of editing and proofreading, how can you effectively incorporate these steps into your research writing process? Here are some strategies to ensure that your paper is polished and professional:

Conclusion

Editing and proofreading are indispensable components of the research writing process. They ensure that your ideas are communicated clearly, your arguments are logically structured, and your paper is free of errors. By dedicating time and effort to these final stages of writing, you enhance the overall quality and professionalism of your work. Remember, even the most well-researched paper can be weakened by poor presentation, so don’t skip these crucial steps. Through careful editing and proofreading, you can ensure that your research is presented in its best possible form, contributing effectively to your field of study.

Visit Our Website: https://helpforthesis.com/writing-research-paper-service.html

[tutorsindia152]

Unveiling the Divergence: ChatGPT vs Expert Writers in Literature Reviews

Introduction:

In the era of AI dominance, the emergence of ChatGPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) has transformed the landscape of content creation. Developed by Open AI, this artificial intelligence language tool has garnered attention for its ability to generate human-like content in real-time. However, as its influence grows, questions arise about its reliability, especially when pitted against the expertise of human writers. This blog explores the comparison between literature reviews crafted by ChatGPT and those composed by expert writers.

ChatGPT: An Innovative Content Generation Tool:

ChatGPT, powered by machine learning algorithms, utilizes Large Language Models to predict and generate text that reads naturally. Early adopters have lauded its coherent and human-like content, leading university students to increasingly rely on ChatGPT for assignments, literature reviews, and dissertations. Nevertheless, concerns about the ethical boundaries and the tool's potential to replace traditional assignments persist (Ariyaratne, 2023; Gao, 2022).

Studies on the Reliability of ChatGPT Content:

Research studies have delved into the capabilities of ChatGPT, aiming to ascertain its potential for academic content creation.

1. Yeadon et al. (2023) assessed ten physics essays, finding that while AI-generated content was of high quality, variations akin to human-written essays were evident.

2. Herbold et al. (2023) compared essays written by humans and ChatGPT, revealing the tool's effectiveness in crafting structured and argumentative essays. However, the limitation of not generating original ideas increases the risk of plagiarism.

3. Ariyaratne et al. (2023) discovered errors and false references in four out of five papers generated by ChatGPT, raising authenticity concerns. Additionally, biases in content were noted (Kleebayon, 2023).

4. Haman (2023) argues the unethical use of ChatGPT when it cannot co-author research, particularly in literature reviews.

ChatGPT vs Expert Writers:

Liao and Sundar (2023) conducted an experiment to highlight ChatGPT's limitations in conducting a literature review. An excerpt from the study demonstrates that while ChatGPT provides seemingly accurate information, experts can discern its lack of depth and accuracy.

Comparison of ChatGPT and Human-Written Content:

1. ChatGPT Response:

   - Describes the MAIN Model by Shyam Sundar, providing an overview of media affordances and heuristics-based information processing.

2. Human-Written Content:

   - Offers a comprehensive explanation of the MAIN model, detailing its acronym (Modality, Agency, Interactivity, Navigability) and emphasizing the psychological effects of media on the audience.

Conclusion:

While ChatGPT showcases remarkable capabilities in generating content, the comparison with human-written content reveals significant disparities. The risk of inaccuracies, biases, and potential plagiarism underscores the need for caution when relying solely on ChatGPT for academic endeavors. Tutors India, a team of academic researchers and writers, emphasizes the importance of expert guidance and adherence to university guidelines for assignments, essays, and dissertations.

About Tutors India:

Tutors India is a reliable source for expert dissertation help, offering assistance in various disciplines. The team, comprised of academic researchers, ensures adherence to university guidelines, proofreading, and editing to deliver error- and plagiarism-free literature reviews.

To explore examples of well-crafted literature reviews in various fields, check out our literature review examples.

[wunderlass]

Liz Ortecho, Science, and Ethics

This post is brought to you by season two of Roswell, New Mexico, and the inconsistent handling of scientific ethics wherein.

In episode 2x07, Maria says the following:

“Henrietta Lacks, Tuskogee, Holmsberg – the Delucas aren’t the first black people to be secretly experimented on.”

What she’s referring to here are 20th century scientific experiments which involved human subjects (specifically, black people) without them providing informed consent for their involvement in these experiments. In fact, for the most part, they had no knowledge of their involvement at all.

These are and other experiments generated enough controversy (as they should) that science and academic research have long since changed their approach to the point that ethics and consent are now at the heart of all research design. Universities have ethics boards that all research must be approved by, and the core principles of academic ethics is that 1) human subjects should not be harmed by research 2) there has to be a risk/benefit analysis (so for the aliens there are no benefits to being involved in the research vs the risk of exposure) and 3) they must provide informed consent to participate (which means they must understand what the research relates to and what their involvement will entail, and have the capacity to agree with the ability to withdraw consent after research has commenced).

For context – I am currently writing my master’s dissertation. It involves social media research, so is far and away from the kind of biological research Liz does, but because social media data is created by people, it is considered research involving human subjects. For that reason, I had to get ethics approval, and I have to ensure I discuss ethics within my dissertation or I. Will. Fail.

There is no chance that at any time during her schooling for the three degrees she has that Liz Ortecho has not been taught about ethics and their importance. I would be surprised if she hasn’t had mandatory ethics classes. Every paper she has written, all the research she has done in the past, must have gone through ethics boards and discussed the subjects of ethics.

Which is why the words “those were just cells—I wasn’t hurting anyone!” in the finale were so galling.

What Liz is saying puts her in direct contradiction to Maria. She is saying that she feels entitled to take the biological material of other people without their informed consent in order to do her work. This is a direct parallel with what happened with Henrietta Lacks. And the sad part is that I don’t think the show understands that by having Liz take the stance that she has, they are framing her as a bad person and a terrible scientist.

There is no justification of “it’s for the greater good” when it comes to research. That ship has sailed. For Liz to ignore the moral lines and repeatedly cross them for her own interests does not make her a hero, or relatable. It does not make her a badass. It just makes her bad.

We already saw that before Liz returned to Roswell, she lost a grant because she couldn’t get ethical approval for human research. Sometimes this is because the people doing the approvals are overly conservative and dislike the usage of things like stem cells (mentioned in s1), though it doesn’t sound like that was the case here.

Genoryx are offering her work that circumvents that, and yet, that isn’t a good thing! Liz wants her legacy to be as a brilliant Latina woman who paved the way for others to follow her. She wants to be the poster girl for Latinx people in medicine and help improve their overall image within society. Unfortunately, if she is doing work without a solid ethical foundation, sooner or later, that is going to get snatched away from her. No matter how much good any breakthrough she makes does, if somebody digs into it and asks questions about how it was achieved, her legacy would end up (rightly) tarnished in exactly the same way as the scientists who worked on the experiments named here.

Liz should know better—she should know the pitfalls of skirting ethical boundaries as much as she understands the benefits her work can bring. It doesn’t seem that she does.

The most egregious example of this came in the finale, when Liz slipped into Steph’s hospital room while she was sleeping and gave her a cure to her ailment.

This drug is untested. Liz has no idea what side effects it might cause. And Steph was unconscious, so unable to agree to trialling this experimental drug.

We saw what Liz’s serum did to Isobel in season one! Steph feels fine now but what if she does have side effects later on? What if her slow death had become a horrifically painful death? Liz had no way of knowing!

Liz crossed a line, and Kyle should understand that line more than anybody. He should be furious at Liz and remain furious at her, even if she saved Steph’s life. Steph is not a lab rat that Liz can unilaterally decide to experiment on.

(the other side of this is that Steph’s “miracle cure” is going to invite a ton of questions and testing. Steph is now going to be at the centre of all of this, and if she has developed alien mutations or proteins she’s at risk. Maybe we’re going to see this picked up in season three but I’m not holding my breath).

Throughout the back half of season two, Liz has been positioned as justified in her stance with regards to the work she’s doing. Which is nonsense, because otherwise she wouldn’t have kept it secret from Max. But she just isn’t in any way, shape or form.

Does she deserve the right to be a scientist? Of course! She can take that job with Genoryx or any of the grants she turned down while lying to Max. The trouble is Liz’s fascination with unethical research, and the bigger problem is how I don’t think Carina understands that at all. The show has turned our leading lady into an inadvertent villain and rather than treating this as a character flaw, it’s championing it, without understanding how dangerous the message they’re sending really is.

[qqueenofhades]

Hi. I'm the lucky person who's (hopefully) gonna have to write a term paper on the diachronic transformation of the idea and definition of the crusades through the middle ages, based on the first crusade. Do you have literature suggestions? Thanks!

Aha, okay. I’ve rummaged through some of my old bibliographies from my master’s thesis (some of which was turned into my book chapter about the crusades in the modern world; I’m willing to send you said book chapter if you want to DM me your email) and my PhD dissertation, and this is a rough list of things that might be useful to you. These all focus on the crusades after the crusades were over -- in other words, they’re not historiographies of the actual period (though some of them obviously do touch on that), but focus on their subsequent political impacts, cultural legacies, scholarly approaches, and modern-day usages. Some of them also discuss the intellectual and legal aspects of the crusades over the time period in question, and how that was perceived by medieval society, such as the Riley-Smith and Tyerman books. These are also fairly general topics. If you want, I can do a second list with the really specialist stuff, covering deeply nitpicky things like the legal evolution of the Latin term “cruce signatus” post-1187, but I’m going to guess you don’t need that at this point. (If you do, hey, hmu.)

These are almost entirely secondary sources, though there are one or two collections of printed primary sources in there, which might help if you’re focusing on the development of the crusade ideal in the Middle Ages as viewed by their contemporaries and not only modern scholarship. The material spans from the official “end” of the crusades (usually given as 1291, though arguably as late as 1456) until the modern day, and mostly deals with their political, social, and cultural ramifications in Europe, the Arab world, and America.

Tal Dingott Alkopher, 'The Social (And Religious) Meanings That Constitute War: The Crusades as Realpolitik vs. Socialpolitik,’ International Studies Quarterly 49 (2005), 725–37

Robert J. Allison, The Crescent Obscured: The United States and the Muslim World, 1776-1815 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995)

Karen Armstrong, Holy War: The Crusades and Their Impact on Today’s World (New York: Anchor Books, 2001)

Akil Awan and A. Warren Dockter, ‘ISIS and the Abuse of History’, History Today, 66 (2016) [http://www.historytoday.com/akil-n-awan-and-warren-dockter/isis-and-abuse-history]

David C. Barker, Jon Hurwitz, and Traci L. Nelson, ‘Of Crusades and Culture Wars: ‘Messianic’ Militarism and Political Conflict in the United States,’ Journal of Politics 70 (2008), 307–22

Jessalyn Bird, Edward Peters, and James M. Powell, eds., Crusade and Christendom: Annotated Documents in Translation from Innocent III to the Fall of Acre, 1187-1291 (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2013)

Karl Borchardt, ‘Casting Out Demons by Beelzebul: Did the Papal Preaching against the Albigensians Ruin the Crusades?’, in La Papauté et les Croisades/The Papacy and the Crusades, ed. Michel Balard (Farnham: Ashgate, 2011), pp. 77–90

James Brundage, ed. and trans., The Crusades: A Documentary Survey (Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1962)

Carl Erdmann, The Origins of the Idea of Crusade (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1977)

Matthew Gabriele, ‘Debating the ‘Crusade’ in Contemporary America,’ The Mediaeval Journal 6 (2016), 73–92

Nickolas Haydock and E.L. Risden, eds., Hollywood in the Holy Land: Essays on Film Depictions of the Crusades and Christian-Muslim Clashes (Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 2008)

Geraldine Heng, ‘Holy War Redux: The Crusades, Futures of the Past, and Strategic Logic in the ‘Clash’ of Religions,’ PMLA 126 (2011), 422–31

Bruce Holsinger, Neomedievalism, Neoconservatism, and the War on Terror (Chicago: Prickly Paradigm, 2007)

Adam Knobler, ‘Holy Wars, Empires, and the Portability of the Past: The Modern Uses of Medieval Crusades,’ Society for Comparative Studies of Religion and History 48 (2006), 293–325

Anouar Majid, Freedom and Orthodoxy: Islam and Difference in the Post-Andalusian Age (Redwood City: Stanford University Press, 2004).

Tomasz Mastnak, Crusading Peace: Christendom, The Muslim World, and Western Political Order (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002)

Jonathan Phillips, ‘The Call of the Crusades,' History Today 59 (2009) [http://www.historytoday.com/jonathan-phillips/call-crusades]

Emran Qureshi and Michael Sells, eds. The New Crusades: Constructing the Muslim Enemy (New York: Columbia University Press, 2003)

Jonathan Riley-Smith, The First Crusade and the Idea of Crusading (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2009)

Jonathan and Louise Riley-Smith, The Crusades: Idea and Reality, 1095-1274 (London: Edward Arnold, 1981)

Omar Sayfo, ‘From Kurdish Sultan to Pan-Arab Champion and Muslim Hero: The Evolution of the Saladin Myth in Popular Arab Culture,’ The Journal of Popular Culture 50 (2017), pp. 65–85.

Elizabeth Siberry, Criticism of Crusading: 1095-1274 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985)

Elizabeth Siberry, The New Crusaders: Images of the Crusaders in the 19th And Early 20th Centuries. (Farnham: Ashgate, 2000)

Christopher Tyerman, The Debate on the Crusades 1099-2010 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)

Christopher Tyerman, The Invention of the Crusades (Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 1998)

Hopefully you will be able to get your hands on at least some of those, and they will be useful to you. As noted, send me a DM if you’d like a PDF copy of my book chapter (it deals with the function of crusading rhetoric in the post-9/11 world, which might be a little too chronologically late for your project, but the option is there).

Happy researching!