Hi RTA,
Do you have any thoughts on why Meghan is not going on the NY trip with Harry. She’s our always there, always first girl so I’m curious about the rationale for sitting this one out.
My theory is that trip is about climate change, Africa, and conservation. That's never been any area of interest for any of Meghan's charity work or interests - it has always been exclusively Harry's thing. Unlike mental health or veterans' support (which the Sussexes do together) or feminism/"feminism" (which is Meghan's thing exclusively).
Since William's NYC trip last year was for conservation and the environment (related to Earthshot), I figure Harry's trip will be similar because anything the Prince of Wales can do, Harry can do better. Also, given the way that Harry's PR announcing the trip latched onto stories about the Earthshot summit happening at the same time also in New York and all the "will he won't he" about whether William would attend...I'm pretty this trip was designed to give Harry some credentials in the environment/conservation world so that come November and William is in South Africa for Earthshot, the Sussexes have competing PR they can do about their own work in environmentalism and conservation.
Specifically with the Clinton thing, I think Harry will be speaking as part of a panel or program on Africa. Looking at the list of participants on the website, there are a lot of African charities/organizations that will be there, including representatives of the Nigerian government (ding ding ding) and the President of Kenya...
Could Kenya be the next Sussex destination? Could be, or at the very least, it's on the short list. We know that William and Kate became engaged there and when Charles was there last year, he said "It was here, in sight of Mount Kenya, that my son, the Prince of Wales, proposed to his wife, now my beloved daughter-in-law" in a speech.
It'll be interesting to see what the Sussexes do next. We'll know rather quickly if whatever Harry goes to NYC for is successful, as they always tell on themselves with their own PR.
25 notes
·
View notes
More notes for Roach conlanging. Roach has grammatical gender, in which only Male, Female, and Object are grammatical genders, whereas Worker uses feminine grammar, Queen and King use a slight variant on feminine grammar, and Drone, and Queen-Alate use masculine grammar. This is because King is derived from Queen, due to their similar positions in a colony, and Queen-Alate is derived from Drone, as both are forms of alate.
Queen is an alteration of feminine grammar that functionally just adds a handful of extra syllables to it, and King is an offsprout of Queen that uses the same grammar with different pronouns. Queen-Alate, despite the name, is derived from Drone, as they are both for referring to different types of alate ant.
Most Roach dialects are intelligible to speakers of Snakemouth Den Cordyceps Roach, but Snakemouth Den Cordyceps Roach is not entirely intelligable to speakers of Roach dialects due to a mix of the excessively specialized vocabulary caused by the specific needs of its speakers, the fact that its speakers do not necessarily have Roach mouthparts and thus may not pronounce syllables in a similar way, and due to the fact that Inanimate Object is a full grammatical gender that does not exist in any other dialect of roach and replaces a decent chunk of terminology for things that previously had Other Words For Them.
30 notes
·
View notes
Yeah OK I'm mad that epsilon didn't get to talk to Tucker or wash. And I know plot contrivsnce he didn't talk to anyone technically but. I. Hm. I just. I don't like it. It's just a further continuation of the fact that after s10 they had no idea what to do with Epsilon and every scene with him feels strained as hell and it's a strain that effects all the other cheaters because if the relationship he has with them!! UGH. God. Fuck.
18 notes
·
View notes
the hardest part of reading naruto fanfic is frankly not sorting through all the stuff i don't care about or trying to ignore awful characterization. it's trying to survive the attempts at japanese. why couldn't my special interest have been in literally any other language.
he would not fucking say that. he would not fucking conjugate verbs like that. he would not use that honorific for that person. that one isn't even an honorific at all. you're killing me
24 notes
·
View notes
i am once again thinking about how fucked it is that sacrificing like half to three fourths of the ships/crews to save 3 people is considered a paragon option but sacrificing about 75% of your unit to defeat the enemy is renegade. why would sacrificing thousands of people to save 3 be considered “compassionate” or “heroic” while sacrificing 75% of your unit (which is 7-14 people apparently, so like 5-11 people) to ensure you won is considered “ruthless” or “apathetic”
(i know why. its bc the first mass effect game doesnt really seem to have a grip on what it wants its morality to be much more than blue= nice, good and red= bad, mean)
21 notes
·
View notes
God came to me in a dream and shared with me His recipe for Black Milk Bubble Tea Tres Leches Cake and I was like whoa! Is that all tho and He said Hm? and I said Like do you have anything else to say to me or to the world and it’s people and He said Oh. No not really. and woke me up at 3:57 in the fucking morning
The cake was pretty good I guess but damn big G is kind of a little shit isn’t He???
14 notes
·
View notes