#i love this no reblogs feature

[hajima-7]

i need to get this off my chest im sorry im putting it under read more jsdghsd (vamp twink negative?? i guess?? yall been warned )

i rly dont like astarion.. especially in act1... like, he's really a cunt, and also the fact that you cant properly call him out for being racist is pissing me off ...the only time u kinda can is with the Gur dude, but even then the dude goes "no issok" .. FYM ISSOK?? dont encourage him??

and the whole grymforge and him approving when u call other people slaves and just...

literally 0 fking hints that he can be a decent person under the whole "white gay twink" persona tm

until you tell miss twilight fan to piss off which.. i get it, he's traumatized, but like... he's still acting like a complete cunt...

not to mention his dumbass tries to kill you twice just in act 1 like, bitch, if i didn't know beforehand his story gets insanely good after, i'd have kicked hiss ass out of the camp right then and there lmao

edit: actually all that aside he's just obnoxious with his DAAARLING and being condescending, thats his worst offense to me sdjghsd

[deedala]

cozy

[ahollowgrave]

hey come here

reblog your own work. reblog it as much as you want. the dashboard is chronological (mostly) so you gotta put it back out there!! ok bye

[sexhaver]

for clarification: is your stance that the *word* kink inherently refers to a sexual experience, and the activities themselves are incidental to the conversation? it isn't clear what exactly you're trying to say which is probably the source of a lot of the grief you're getting on the topic.

That's the only way I can make sense of "non sexual bdsm is just hurting people for fun" being posted as a gotcha, despite obviously (to me) being an implicit agreement with the argument that commonly "kinky" activities can be nonsexual depending on context.

anon bc I don't want to risk catching your "bizarre anons" syndrome, sorry if you think I'm a part of that lol

if you, personally, ever get sexually aroused by an activity/fantasy/power dynamic/lifestyle choice, then it is a kink (TO YOU) even when you aren't actively aroused by it

if you, personally, never get sexually aroused by an activity/fantasy/power dynamic/lifestyle choice, then it is NOT a kink (TO YOU), even if it's something most people would assume is "kinky". it is instead a "hobby" or "interest"

as alluded to in point 2, there are a lot of activities/fantasies out there (like BDSM, inflation, findom, etc) that most people assume are kinks. this is because they are, in fact, kinks to most people who participate in them. if you are into these topics without getting aroused by them, the solution is NOT to keep saying that you have that kink while redefining the kink in question as "not inherently sexual". the solution is to say that you have a "hobby" or "interest" in the topic (you can add "nonsexual" if you want to be clear, but remember, "nonsexual [x] kink" is an oxymoron)

people who insist on referring to their entirely nonsexual participation in a mostly-kinky scene (like leather or shibari) as "nonsexual kink" fall into one of two camps: either they want to keep using the word "kink" without having to associate with those yucky perverts who are only trying to get off (which is obviously morally wrong), or they are in fact deriving sexual pleasure from those activities but are also trying to groom minors into participating in them under the pretense of "no it's not sexual so it's totally fine" (see the infamouse "sfw inflation kink community" snafu on here last year)

tl;dr: there is a reason you have to specify "nonsexual [x] kink" and do not have to specify "sexual [x] kink", and the people who don't get this point are mostly just being obnoxious about not knowing what words mean but are occasionally using this confusion to harm people

[skunkes]

Idk how people have popular posts on here, someone adds something unfunny to the reblogs of mine and I think about blowing up this building and everybody in it

[juaneloriginal]

silly thingy

@blackkatdraws's sillies

[buwheal]

woah. actual thought out reference?

Completely disregard wtf the reference from a couple weeks (a month?) ago looks like. Completely inaccurate. not sure what I was thinking w/ that one. This time I thought this one through, lol. wahoo!! Ive been kind of lazy and totally leaving out features the past few times Ive drawn him and I dont want that to happen again because he loses all the fun features.

notes written out for those who need it (glances behind my shoulder at the mobile app) under the cut. be warned, its long, lol.

starting from the top left, going across to the right side in rows.

-TURN-AROUND -opt grey hairs/grey stripe. he keeps it evenly colored with car oil. -eyebrow crease opt. -head lifted for convenience (for the pose. Also spelt that wrong on the image whoops) -5" when slouched. -neutral expression. Teeth always visible. -eyebags NOT opt. (Except in certain circumstances.) -"Tail" not usually visible -HORRIBLE posture* -black bottom lip pokes out a little -hands reach knees in reg. posture -Gnarly mullet -Overbite -Constant slouch. -Warped lens/frame -Sweaty & jittery a lot - \___ misc. extremes ___/ -BJD body -Motherboard cover -Plush tummy :-) -wears heart boxers underneath. Not shown. - |dissociating-----|-------disconnected| -sensitive eyes w/o glasses. Squints. - :arrow: Sparratically ejects -overdramatic - *except when actively interacting with someone - 5"1 when standing straight - |forced--|genuine--|?----|???---|

[cowgirlp1xie]

WHEN IS TUMBLR GONNA MAKE A FEATURE WHERE I CAN SAVE POSTS INTO DIFFERENT FOLDERS⁉️⁉️⁉️

[when-its-over-it-wont-be-over]

Favorite reblog that I saw

[steeltwigz]

Ok I've been getting a lot more Taco II discourse on my timeline recently. NOW I see what you all mean.... I gotta be honest, a lot of the posts to me still read as fans making up things to be mad about fhdjf what do you MEAN "Taco is irredeemable and doesn't Want to be redeemed and forcing her down a traditional redemption arc is Impossible AND you're a misogynist for misinterpreting her character" OKAYYY. Sit down buddy, Cool IT. What in the WORLD are you talking about. Did you miss the last minute of the episode where she says "no more running" and decides to face her fears head on, with the support of MePad. Did you miss all those letters she sent to Pickle, or her reaching for the portal for "another chance" at season 1, so she could fix her mistakes and wouldn't have hurt her friend? "But she wanted to kill Balloon that one time!" ONE she wanted to taze him, relax. I mean like if he pops he pops, but that's pretty Par For The Course for an object show, ESPECIALLY when II2 was still developing its more serious, less hyper-violent slapstick tone. TWO part of her problem is that she doesn't change w the game, she's still running (at least partially) on season 1 rules and in season 1 killing people was pretty normal, sorryy. Like a HUUUUGE point of her narrative arc is how she's still making a lot of the same mistakes she made with Pickle, but she doesn't realize until it's too late bcuz she's still too focused on the game (until it all comes crashing down a second time and she hates herself about it, and tries to End The Whole Show (THROUGH NONVIOLENCE MIGHT I ADD)). The whole show, she's wanted nothing more than to be redeemed and to undo her mistakes becuz she REGRETS HURTING PEOPLE AND she doesn't fully believe she can or that she deserves to, until MePad begins to help her out. These two things can both be true!!

Also, come On man. Sooooo many characters in this show are "bad people" or can be mean or hurtful. (Honestly, Id argue that a huge theme of the show is realizing people are multi-faceted and that people aren't only their worst traits, or their stereotype personalities but are in fact just as complex and personable as anyone else. That the show and the game and the challenge bring out the worst in people for Drama or Views or Money, but that doesn't mean that's all there IS to the competitors, and even the hosts, and you can't judge them based solely on their worst traits, which are getting exacerbated and unnaturally worsened due to the harmful exploitative nature of reality TV). That doesn't make ANY of them "irredeemable". Taco can have a redemption arc just as much as MePhone or Knife or Nickel can, who IN MY OPINION have done similar, and also Way Worse Things than she did, that no one ever brings up in these conversations. And NO that doesn't make you a misogynist for misinterpreting Taco or for thinking Knife is fine and she isn't, it just makes you have poor plot comprehension skills and you're predisposed to hold bias against the antagonist character becuz she's the antagonist. It's Whatever.

[can-of-slorgs]

caw 🦅

[deedala]

Kate Siegel and Rahul Kohli in The Fall of the House of Usher

[pink-november]

lmao

[lovethytendytenderly]

I've Been Waiting by Lil Peep w/ ILoveMakonnen & Fall Out Boy // an edit a day til penguins hockey, a countdown (day 17)

x

[v-anrouge]

When 🤤🤤🤤 people draw my favs 🤤🤤🤤 with expression lines 🤤🤤🤤

[fobnsfwdoodles]

If they didn't want me to make them into yaoi they could stop being yaoi for five seconds