#is algorithmic trading profitable

[quanttrix1]

Psychology of Algorithmic Trading – How Emotions Impact Bots

The Psychology of Algorithmic Trading: What Really Goes On in the Mind of a Trader?

Introduction

Algorithmic trading may sound like a world dominated by machines, numbers, and emotionless execution. But the reality? It’s still deeply human. While the algorithms do the heavy lifting—executing trades at lightning speed based on code and logic—behind every trading bot is a human being driven by ambition, fear, greed, and countless other emotions.

Let’s take a stroll into the mental maze of the people behind the machines and understand how psychology shapes algorithmic trading decisions. If you’re thinking this is all math and zero mindset—you’re in for a surprise!

 Explore the psychology of algorithmic trading and how human behavior impacts strategy, emotion, and algo trading software price, algorithmic trading software price.

What is Algorithmic Trading?

Algorithmic Trading—often called algo trading—uses computer programs to follow a defined set of rules for placing, modifying, and closing orders. These rules are based on timing, price, quantity, and other mathematical models.

But while the execution may be automated, the creation of those strategies is still very human. Think of it like a self-driving car: you may not touch the wheel, but someone had to design the GPS.

The Role of Emotions in Traditional vs. Algorithmic Trading

In traditional trading, human emotions take the driver's seat. Decisions are often fueled by impulse, panic, or overconfidence. In contrast, algorithmic trading tries to bypass these emotions by relying on pre-set logic.

Yet, here’s the catch: the logic itself is created by humans. The moment a trader adjusts the algorithm due to recent losses or market noise, emotions sneak back in.

Can Algorithms Be Emotionless?

Technically, yes. Algorithms don’t feel—but their creators do. So when emotions influence the design or tweaking of these bots, the algorithms inherit those emotional fingerprints.

Think of an algorithm as a mirror. It reflects whatever mindset it was built with.

The Trader’s Mind Behind the Code

Every piece of algo logic is born from a trader’s mindset. Did the developer just suffer a loss? Are they trying to beat the market aggressively? Are they being too cautious after a recent downturn?

The mental state of the developer affects how conservative or aggressive the rules will be. A confident trader might set looser parameters; a fearful one might over-tighten stop-loss triggers.

Fear and Greed: Invisible Forces

You’ve heard the saying: “Markets are driven by fear and greed.” These two emotions are also the silent puppeteers behind many algorithmic strategies.

A trader trying to maximize gains may write an aggressive strategy, pushing for every pip. Another might build a risk-averse bot, prioritizing preservation over profit—rooted in fear of loss.

Overconfidence and Cognitive Bias in Algo Strategies

Overconfidence can lead developers to believe their system is flawless. They might ignore backtest inconsistencies or dismiss warning signs during live trading.

Biases like confirmation bias (seeing only what you want to see) or recency bias (favoring recent data) can also skew algorithmic decisions. These cognitive traps are human, but they leak into the machine.

Behavioral Finance Meets Technology

Behavioral finance studies how psychology affects investment decisions. When combined with algorithmic trading, this creates a fascinating hybrid:

Emotions inform the algorithm.

The algorithm executes emotionally-rooted logic.

Traders react emotionally to the algorithm's performance.

It’s a feedback loop of psychology and code.

FOMO and the Algorithm

FOMO—Fear of Missing Out—is not just for manual traders. Many algorithmic strategies are triggered by breakouts or volume spikes, which can often be rooted in FOMO behaviors.

A trader might modify the algorithm to enter trades faster or increase size after missing a big move. These decisions are not logic—they're fear disguised as urgency.

Designing for Discipline: Psychology in Coding Logic

Great algo traders know this: the best algorithms are the ones that enforce discipline.

By baking discipline into the code—like max daily losses, cool-off periods, or win/loss ratios—they help counteract emotional overreactions. It’s like building a digital “coach” that keeps you on track.

When Traders Blame the Bot

When trades go wrong, it’s tempting to say: “It’s the bot’s fault!”

But in reality, the algorithm only did what it was told. If it lost money, the real issue may lie in emotional coding, insufficient testing, or rash updates. The responsibility remains human.

The Myth of Fully Automated Decision-Making

Even with automation, decision-making is rarely 100% hands-off. Traders monitor, tweak, and override when needed.

This introduces new psychology: hesitation to intervene, fear of missing an update, or post-loss regret. The bot might trade—but the trader still feels everything.

Managing Risk Through Psychological Awareness

Understanding your psychological tendencies—like revenge trading, fear of loss, or impulsive decision-making—can help design smarter, safer bots.

Think of it as therapy for traders. Self-awareness leads to better algorithm design and risk management.

The Role of Mindfulness and Mental Conditioning

Top algorithmic traders treat their mental fitness like physical fitness.

They practice mindfulness, stay detached from outcomes, and stick to their process. These habits don’t just help in coding—they prevent irrational reactions during drawdowns or unexpected market shifts.

How Algo Trading Software Price Influences Psychology

Algo trading software price isn't just a number—it impacts psychology. A high price might create a “premium confidence bias,” making traders over-rely on the software. Conversely, a cheaper tool might make them hesitant, thinking it's not robust.

But in truth, performance depends more on logic and discipline than price. Still, perception plays a powerful role in decision-making.

Final Thoughts: Trading the Mind First

Ultimately, while machines do the work, humans still drive the outcome.

By understanding the psychology behind algorithmic trading, we don’t just build better bots—we become better traders. Discipline, awareness, and emotional balance will always be as critical as strategy, speed, or the algorithmic trading software price.

FAQs

Can emotions still affect algorithmic trading? Yes, even though algorithms are emotionless, their design and modifications often reflect the emotions of the trader.

Does the price of algo trading software guarantee better results? Not necessarily. While higher-priced software may offer more features, success depends on the trader’s strategy and discipline.

How can traders manage fear in algorithmic trading? Through mindfulness, self-awareness, and building disciplined logic into their algorithms to minimize emotional interference.

Is algorithmic trading fully automated? While execution is automated, human oversight, strategy updates, and emotional reactions still play a role.

What’s the biggest psychological mistake traders make with algorithms? Overconfidence in their bots or constantly tweaking them due to fear or loss can undermine performance.

[queen-mabs-revenge]

communist generative ai boosters on this website truly like

[thebestforexeas]

Algocrat AI Review - Top-Performing Cryptocurrency Copy Trading Platform

https://www.bestforexeas.com/algocrat-ai-review/

[signode-blog]

Mastering Trading with the True Range Indicator: A Comprehensive Guide

Introduction In the vast and dynamic world of trading, having the right tools and indicators at your disposal can make all the difference between success and failure. One such powerful tool that has gained prominence among traders is the True Range Indicator. In this comprehensive guide, we will delve into what the True Range Indicator is, how it works, and how traders can leverage it to make…

[algos11]

In algorithmic trading, on platforms like uTrade Algos, technical indicators play a crucial role in formulating trading strategies. These indicators provide valuable insights into market trends, momentum, and potential price movements, guiding algorithmic traders in their decision-making process. 

[mostlysignssomeportents]

The most remarkable thing about antitrust (that no one talks about)

I'm on a 20+ city book tour for my new novel PICKS AND SHOVELS. Catch me in PITTSBURGH on May 15 at WHITE WHALE BOOKS, and in PDX on Jun 20 at BARNES AND NOBLE. More tour dates here.

It's hard to remember now, but for more than three years under Biden, it was possible to read the headlines every morning and feel excited that your government was taking big, decisive action to tame the corporate behemoths that rip you off, maim you on the job, and undermine our democracy.

The antitrust surge under Biden was and is a truly remarkable thing: a sustained, organized, effective government policy that supported the interests of the majority of people against the interests of a tiny cohort of ultra-wealthy wreckers and looters. According to political scientists, that antitrust surge should have been impossible. In 2014, a pair of political scientists from Northwestern and Princeton published their landmark study, "Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens":

https://faculty.wcas.northwestern.edu/jnd260/cab/CAB2012%20-%20Page1.pdf

The paper analyzes 1,779 US policy fights from 1981 to 2002, and conclude that the US only does things that regular people want if those are also things that rich people want:

Ordinary citizens… get the policies they favor, but only because those policies happen also to be preferred by the economically-elite citizens who wield the actual influence.

When ordinary people want something that rich people don't want, ordinary people lose. Even when 80% of us want something, we only get our way 43% of the time. This is antidemocratic in the most fundamental sense: rich minorities get their way at the expense of working people, nearly all the time.

And then there's antitrust. Ordinary people don't like having their wages stolen. They don't like having their rents jacked up by algorithmic collusion. They don't like having their air and water poisoned. They don't like being mangled or killed on the job. They don't like having to sign noncompetes that bar them from taking a better job if one opens up.

More to the point, working people are not made better off when stuff like this happens. On average, working people own either zero or nearly zero stocks, not even in a 401(k) retirement savings, because 40 years of wage stagnation and the near-abolition of employer based defined-benefits pensions has left most Americans with nearly no retirement savings (hence the panic over Trump and Musk's attempt to kill Social Security):

https://pluralistic.net/2020/07/25/derechos-humanos/#are-there-no-poorhouses

By contrast, the richest 10% own 94% of all the stocks held by Americans. Even if you, personally, don't want to be locked up by a noncompete or have your water poisoned by frackers, if you're in the top 10%, you probably benefit when this happens. After all, businesses cheat and maim because it's profitable, not because they're sadistic (they may be sadistic, or they may be depraved in their indifference to the harms they visit upon the rest of us, but the reason they do it is money):

https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/stock-market-ownership-wealthiest-americans-one-percent-record-high-economy-2024-1

Antitrust systematically attacks the sky-high monopoly rents extracted by the largest corporations and redistributes them to working people and small businesses, which, for the most part, are not listed on stock exchanges or traded over the counter. In other words, antitrust is a way to clobber the policy priorities favored by the wealthy in order to benefit the rest of us.

That means that the antitrust surge is amazing. It's one of those things that shouldn't exist at all. It defies political science. What's more, antitrust fervor precedes the Biden administration. Some of the Biden administration's most important antitrust cases (like the Google case) started under Trump. Some were even kicked off by far-right state attorneys general, like Texas's cartoonishly corrupt AG Ken Paxton, who led a coalition of nearly every AG in American in suing Facebook.

Antitrust fervor isn't a US phenomenon – it's global. Take Canada: in its entire history, the Competition Bureau (Canada's answer to the FTC) filed only three merger challenges, and won zero of them. But last year, Parliament passed a massive, muscular new bill giving the Competition Bureau unprecedented powers:

https://www.parl.ca/legisinfo/en/bill/44-1/c-59

In the UK, the Competition and Markets Authority led the world in investigating and punishing Big Tech monopolies…and they did so under a succession of shambolic Conservative governments. Indeed, it was a Labour (or "Labour") Prime minister, Keir Starmer, who fired the head of the CMA and replaced him with the former head of Amazon UK:

https://pluralistic.net/2025/01/22/autocrats-of-trade/#dingo-babysitter

We've seen big, ambitious antitrust action all over the world: Germany, France, Spain, the EU, Australia, South Korea, Japan, and even China.

It goes without saying that there is no dark money org funneling billionaires' wealth into this project to destroy billionaires. This is a groundswell political phenomenon, it's global, and it's powerful. The fact that Starmer and Trump have gutted their wildly effective antitrust agencies is heartbreaking, but it's not the end. The reason the US and the UK pursued such an ambitious antitrust agenda is the public groundswell. Getting rid of the agencies doesn't kill that groundswell – if anything, it only makes people madder.

It's hard to overstate just how weird the antitrust surge is. We've been fighting for decades for even tiny concessions to the interests of working people – a modest, below-inflation rise in the minimum wage, say, or small-dollar efforts to improve public education, reduce student debt, or control the price of prescription drugs. These efforts have largely failed, and when they've succeeded, the victories were modest, or worse, merely symbolic.

But antitrust is the exception. Antitrust – again, a movement that is squarely aimed at neutralizing the power of the wealthy – is the most successful popular movement of the past decade. Companies worth trillions of dollars are facing breakup as a result of antitrust cases. Everyone from meat-packers to landlords to sea freighters to pharma companies have faced massive, multi-billion-dollar setbacks at the expense of the antitrust movement.

Like I said, the current antitrust surge kicked off under Trump. But of course, that doesn't mean the GOP power-brokers support it – rather, they were cornered into it by their own base. The same is true of the Democrats: Biden didn't appoint the most effective antitrust enforcers the US has seen since the 1970s because he opposed corporate monopolies. Remember, this is the guy who, on the campaign trail, told business audiences that "nothing would fundamentally change" under a Biden administration:

https://www.salon.com/2019/06/19/joe-biden-to-rich-donors-nothing-would-fundamentally-change-if-hes-elected/

Nor does the Democratic Party power-structure support this stuff. Remember when Harris's billionaire surrogates Marc Cuban and Reid Hoffman demanded that Harris fire the Biden administration's antitrust enforcers?

https://prospect.org/power/2024-07-26-corporate-wishcasting-attack-lina-khan/

The success of the antitrust movement happened in spite of the Democratic Party, in spite of the GOP. To the extent that either party embraced an antitrust agenda, it's because the people demanded it, so undeniably that the parties chose the public interest over the interest of the billionaires who call nearly every shot for them.

It's impossible to overstate what an anomaly this is. On today's episode of the excellent Organized Money podcast, hosts Matt Stoller and David Dayen reminisce with Jonathan Kanter, Biden's former DoJ antitrust boss, about a conference they attended together in 2017 where the after-dinner keynote speaker was Richard Posner, a judge who was hugely influential in the dismantling of antitrust in the 1970s and 1980s. According to Dayen, the substance of Posner's keynote was:

Antitrust. That's dead, isn't it? I don't know what you guys are even talking about. This is ridiculous. There is no such thing as antitrust law.

And Kanter, Dayen, Stoller and future FTC chair Lina Khan were all sitting around a table, listening to this in 2017. By 2021, Kanter and Khan were running the DoJ and FTC antitrust agenda, and they did more in the next three years than all their predecessors over the past 40 years, combined.

Khan, Kanter, and their colleagues (like Rohit Chopra at the CFPB) did incredible work during the Biden administration. There is no denying their skill, their competence, their commitment. But the reason they were able to bring all those virtues to bear in service to working Americans is the massive popular surge of rage at corporate dominance. In other words, the Biden administration's prodigious trustbusting accomplishments were the effect of the antitrust movement, not its cause.

The corollary is that just because Trump has dismantled the agencies that were buoyed up by the movement, it doesn't make the movement itself smaller or less powerful. If anything, the Trump regime's relentless pursuit of an agenda in service to the rich at working people's expense will only add fuel to the anti-corporate, anti-billionaire wildfire. Trump's tariff chaos might be bad for some parts of the ruling class, but as Van Jackson writes for Labor Notes, there's plenty of plutocrats who love the prospect of a deep recession sparked by global trade chaos:

[L]avish tax cuts, deregulation, and an environment friendly to union-busting are just as valuable to most CEOs as a growing economy. What they lose in the stock market, they will more than make up in surplus labor, a fire sale on distressed assets, and Trump’s promise to totally eliminate the capital gains tax.

https://labornotes.org/blogs/2025/04/viewpoint-why-oligarchs-want-recession?

American wealth is more concentrated today than it was in France on the eve of the French Revolution. People are pissed. That anger is out there, waiting to be harnessed by smart political movements:

https://twitter.com/highbrow_nobrow/status/1909607195961917687

To grab that anger and mobilize it, we need to show people that their rage over specific issues is actually downstream of excessive corporate power. Furious that one company owns every brand of eggs and has used the excuse of bird flu to make record profits? You're not angry about eggs, you're angry about corporate power:

https://pluralistic.net/2025/03/10/demand-and-supply/#keep-cal-maine-and-carry-on

Worried that the EPA has been put in an induced coma and that means your kids will grow up with asthma and lead poisoning? You're actually angry about corporate power:

https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2025/04/air-pollution-trump-administration/682361/

The Department of Education is in the hands of a woman who took over her rapey husband's professional wrestling monopoly, a corporation that misclassified performers as contractors, leaving them without health care so they have to beg for pennies on Gofundme so they can die with dignity of their workplace-related injuries:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8UQ4O7UiDs

Trump's Secretary of Education is monumentally unqualified for her position. Not only is she is planning to fire teachers en masse and replace them with AI, she doesn't know what AI is and just gave a speech where she repeatedly referred to it as "A-1":

https://gizmodo.com/trumps-education-chief-linda-mcmahon-repeatedly-calls-ai-a1-in-school-speech-2000587329

Angry about this? Worried that your kids' teachers are about to be replaced with steak-sauce thanks to the incompetence of this fucking muttonhead? Me too. But you're not just angry at Trump or Linda McMahon – you're angry at corporate power.

In his book The Public Domain, the copyright scholar James Boyle talks about the political salience of the term "ecology." Boyle recounts how, prior to the rise of the word "ecology," there were many standalone issues, but no movement. Sure, you care about owls, and I care about the ozone layer, but what does the gaseous composition of the upper atmosphere have to do with the destiny of charismatic nocturnal avians?

https://thepublicdomain.org/thepublicdomain1.pdf

The term "ecology" welded all these thousands of issues together into a movement. When I look at the incredible, organic, bottom-up surge of antitrust energy, the only explanation I can find is that something similar is happening here. Concentrated corporate power is the common enemy of beer drinkers, surgeons, shippers, patients, farmers, grocery shoppers, social media users, any anyone who wears sneakers:

https://www.openmarketsinstitute.org/learn/monopoly-by-the-numbers

Something remarkable is happening, right under our noses. Nothing like this has happened in my lifetime. The world is terrifying, but this? This is exciting.

Smart political organizers have a once-in-a-century opportunity here. Trump's wildly unpopular destruction of the antitrust enforcement system opens up all kinds of opportunities for state enforcers (remember, states can also enforce antitrust law):

https://www.thesling.org/state-antimonopoly-enforcement-must-be-a-guardian-of-american-democracy-heres-how/

A massive political change that bubbles up from the bottom, aimed directly at the richest, most powerful people in the history of the human race, is an amazing thing. As bad as things are – and boy are they bad – this remains true, and important.

If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this post to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2025/04/10/solidarity-forever/#oligarchism

Image: umseas (modified) https://www.flickr.com/photos/snre/34605145761/

CC BY 2.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en

[the-most-humble-blog]

<div style="white-space:pre-wrap"> <meta species-shame="irrecoverable"> <script> ARCHIVE_TAG="HUMANITY::DEATH_GOD_PRIMATE::KILLSTREAK_COSMIC" EFFECT: ego fracture, ancestral guilt, laughter through blood TRIGGER_WARNING="statistical war crimes, species-wide roast, extinction prophecy" </script>

🩸 THE MOST HORRIFICALLY MURDEROUS PRIMATE IN HISTORY? LOOK IN THE FUCKING MIRROR. 🩸

—

You ever wonder what the most blood-soaked, batshit insane, nightmare-fueled apex predator ever to soil the surface of this planet is?

Chimp? Gorilla? A baboon with an inferiority complex and a machete?

Nah, bitch.

It’s you.

Not “humankind” in a feel-good, TED Talk tone.

YOU. Right now. Reading this. Sitting there with murder in your bloodline and a Wi-Fi connection.

—

🧠 YOU ARE A HIGH-FUNCTIONING MASSACRE ENGINE.

You aren’t just violent. You are performance-art-level violent.

🦈 Sharks kill because they’re hungry. 🦁 Lions kill to eat. 🐍 Snakes kill to defend themselves.

You?

You kill because you got ghosted. Because a flag looked different. Because a guy walked into your parking space.

And you’ll do it with flair, hashtags, and historical revisionism.

—

📉 STATS THAT MAKE GOD FLINCH

🧬 Chimps kill 1-2% of their group. You?

You were clocking 12–15% murder rates in prehistoric societies before literacy.

Middle Ages? 30-40 per 100,000 murdered every year in Europe. Not counting all the unrecorded shankings over bread, women, and vibes.

Modern era? Just a sample platter of your greatest hits:

🌍 WWII: 85 million dead

🍚 Mao’s Great Leap: 45 million starved

❄️ Stalin’s purges: 20 million deleted

⛓️ Atlantic Slave Trade: 15+ million moved like furniture, millions more dead

🌄 Native genocide: 90% wiped out like a fucking software update

Y’all killed entire civilizations and gave it a name like Manifest Destiny.

This isn’t war.

This is performance homicide with branding.

—

😈 SERIAL KILLING? THAT’S FOLKLORE TO US.

You are the only species that kills:

✅ For fun ✅ For art ✅ For profit ✅ For theology ✅ For lunch ✅ For no reason at all

Dolphins might be freaky.

But only humans looked at a beating heart and thought:

“Y’know what? I bet I can make furniture out of that.”

Ted Bundy? Dahmer? Gein?

They're not anomalies. They're proof-of-concept.

You evolved just enough empathy to feel the kill, then just enough abstraction to enjoy the aftermath.

—

🏆 YOU ARE THE MICHAEL JORDAN OF DEATH.

If murder was a sport?

Humanity invented the court, killed the referee, and played naked for drama.

You kill:

For land (colonialism, gentrification, turf wars)

For faith (crusades, jihads, “convert or die”)

For oil (aka “freedom”)

For resources (the Congo’s blood-soaked minerals)

For politics (genocides, death squads, Twitter beef)

For TikTok clout (yes, we’re here now)

And sometimes?

You just do it.

Because "he looked at me wrong."

—

🤡 “BUT WE’VE EVOLVED!” — SWEETIE, NO.

You think we’re peaceful now?

You just moved the slaughter to spreadsheets.

Now we:

☑️ Drone strike families from climate-controlled bunkers ☑️ Starve nations through economic sanctions ☑️ Destroy lives via algorithm ☑️ Gaslight history with AI ☑️ Disappear whistleblowers behind corporate logos

You didn’t evolve.

You rebranded.

Now murder wears a fucking lanyard.

—

🌍 THE 21ST CENTURY IS SHAPING UP GREAT 🔥

🌪️ Climate collapse? We’re about to kill ourselves with weather.

🤖 AI war systems? Robots with machine guns and zero emotional baggage.

🏛️ Rising fascism? Been there. Mass graves. Black boots. Coming back like a reboot no one asked for.

You’re not better.

You’re smoother.

You’re murder with UX design.

—

🪞 LOOK IN THE MIRROR, EXTINCTION MONKEY.

You are a walking extinction event.

Lions stop when they’re full. You kill until God hits reset.

You kill the future. You kill infrastructure. You kill your own blood. You kill while praying.

And the scariest part?

You call it progress.

So next time you brush your teeth, and glance up at your reflection?

Just say:

“There it is. The deadliest apex predator in planetary history. Homo sapiens. Made of meat. Designed for violence. And I love brunch.”

—

📢 REBLOG. FOLLOW. SPREAD THE APOCALYPSE.

This isn’t a mood board. This isn’t a meme. This is your species profile.

You are what nightmares have nightmares about.

—

🧠 FOLLOW [The Most Humble Blog] for more brain-cracking transmissions- Now on Patreon! 🔁 REBLOG to slap someone awake with data 💬 COMMENT if you’re ready to get roasted alive with stats

You don’t escape this.

You either accept it or get eaten by it.

</div> <!-- END TRANSMISSION [BLOOD-INDEX: 100%. MIRROR STATUS: SHATTERED.] -->

[probablyasocialecologist]

Abstract economic theorizing typically asserts that prices coordinate the best rational resource allocations and that prices reflect the best information available while the market bets of the smartest people with skin in the game ensure efficiency. But Russell exposes this as flawed fig-leaf logic. He quotes one market participant (an insider “traitor”) confessing the “irrationality of commodity prices.” Algorithmic trades are shots fired between swanky skyscrapers as “hedge funds raid each other’s coffers,” collaterally taking calories out of the mouths of poor kids. Besides, only the absurdly blinkered could imagine that global food is used rationally or efficiently—never mind ethically. Grain used for biofuels “eats up enough food to feed 1.9 billion people annually.” Rich-world pets are less food insecure than the 2.4 billion people (1 in 3 humans) classified by the U.N. as lacking “access to adequate food.” Seventy-seven percent of global farming land is used for livestock which mostly the rich consume (or waste). Indeed, 30-40 percent of all food grown is wasted. Market forces aren’t in the business of fixing this sort of massive and malicious malarkey. For instance, analysis of market-oriented African Green Revolution projects, which aimed to “catalyze a farming revolution in Africa” by helping farmers in 13 countries over a period of 15 years switch from traditional subsistence-and-barter methods to raising monocrops for commercial export, concluded that they led to 31 percent higher undernourishment. As Timothy A. Wise reports in Mongabay News, this large-scale effort was led by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the U.S., U.K., and German governments, with the goal of doubling “yields and incomes for 30 million small-scale farming families while halving food insecurity.” As much as $1 billion per year went into the effort. But integration of small farmers into international markets put these small farmers under the same pressures that for-profit farmers face the world over (but without rich-nation safety nets). They’re at the mercy of volatile global pricing but have high fixed costs of inputs like commercial seeds and fertilizers. The net result was that even when yields rose, they often “failed to translate into rising incomes.” Many of these small farmers could now neither barter traditional crops with neighbors, nor did they have sufficient income to buy local food, a punishing recipe for food insecurity (further details are available in Wise’s coverage). The bottom line is that markets only feed you if you can pay (to match the bets of invisible-hearted hedge-funders or manufacturers of rich-world pet food).

[mariacallous]

Digital advertising is a whopping $700 billion (£530 billion) industry that remains largely unregulated, with few laws in place to protect brands and consumers. Companies and brands advertising products often don’t know which websites display their ads. I run Check My Ads, an ad tech watchdog, and we constantly deal with situations where advertisers and citizens have been the victims of lies, scams, and manipulations. We have removed ads from websites with serious disinformation about Covid-19, false election content, and even AI-generated obituaries.

Currently, if a brand wants to advertise a product, Google facilitates the ad placement based on desired ad reach and metrics. It may technically follow through on the agreement by delivering views and clicks, but does not provide transparent data about how and where the ad views came from. It is possible that the ad was shown on unsavory websites diametrically opposed to the brand’s values. For example, in 2024, Google was found to be profiting by placing product ads on websites that promoted hardcore pornography, disinformation, and even hate speech, against the brands’ wishes.

In 2025, however, this scandal will end, as we start to enact the first regulations targeting the digital advertising industry. Around the world, lawmakers in Brussels, Ottawa, Washington, and London are already in the early stages of developing regulation that will ensure brands have access to the legal support to ask questions, check ad data, and receive automatic refunds when they find that their digital campaigns have been subject to fraud or safety violations.

In Canada, for example, Parliament is deliberating the enactment of the Online Harms Act, a law to incentivize the removal of sexual content involving minors. The idea behind this law is that if the content is illegal, then making money off it should be illegal, too.

In California and New York, advocates are also proposing legislation that will aim to implement a know-your-customer law to track the global financial trade of advertising. This is significant because these two states power the global ad tech industry. New York has more ad tech companies than any other city in the world. Transparency laws enacted in California, on the other hand, would affect Google’s international advertising business—by far the biggest ad tech company in the world.

Beyond brand and consumer issues, the unregulated nature of the digital advertising landscape is a direct threat to democracy. In the US, for instance, presidential campaign spending remains effectively unregulated. It is estimated that the presidential campaigns will spend up to $2 billion (£1.5 billion) on digital advertising in 2024. With current laws, we will likely have no external data about their refunds or rates.

In 2025, the legislative pressure is on for big tech companies to regulate ad technology.

[ourtalechara]

Don't ask what I'm doing I'm not doing anything (VBS Data Stream guys look at it)

Kohane An Akito Toya and Luka

(actually nice and finished looking lyrics under cut)

Eventually, all walls meet demolition

So Wall Street had to keep the tradition

Their financial systems resigned to ignition

And out of the ashes, we have arisen

An empire is forged in the fire of ambition

In business, there isn't the time for attrition

Invest to suppress then ingest competition

Then each acquisition is new ammunition

When governments crumble and fall to the floor

That was paved with the graves of a corporate war

A fundament funded in blood just to shore

A foundation for founding our covenant

Born of a need for control of societal entropy

Enterprise at the price of your indemnity

Chart out the course and of course you were meant to be

Bent to the will of a corporate entity

Arasaka Security. You're in safe hands

We're the light in your screens, we're the lead in your veins

Then you wake from your dreams, so we can sell them again

In the light we distract with the shiny and new

So you're blind to the fact that the product is you

So let your brain dance and replay the dream

But don't drown in the data stream

'Cause we see where you are and we see where you go

'Cause we know what you own and we own what you know

From the top of all our towers, the corridors of power clearly need rewiring

Arasaka saw the spark and then embarked upon the path to turn that spark to lightning

There's no autonomous megalopolis so populous or prosperous you could reside in

And every citizen that's living in this city is a digit on the charts we're climbing

Political systems are too inefficient

They split like the atom and burned in the fission

Now every department and every decision

Defer to the herds of our corporate divisions

If you don't remember the ballot you cast

It's printed on every receipt you were passed

Each time you selected our products and services

We were elected in each of your purchases

What's left to do when you've got the monopoly?

Turn the consumer into the commodity

It isn't hard where you've hardware neurology

Honestly, do read the company policy

Take information and trade it for wealth

You pay it in each augmentation we sell

It's easy to cut out the middleman

When he's cut out most of himself

Arasaka Finance. Investing in your future

(chorus)

All that you say on the net we composite

To maps that go straight from your head to your pocket

Complain if you want, you're still making deposits

Of data — each day you log on is a profit

Society currently lists electronic

So isn't conducting resistance ironic?

We've plenty of skeletons locked in our closets

But yours are assembled from old-stock hydraulics

So lucky we know just the pieces you need

All plucked from your social media feeds

The places you go and the posts that you read

All snatched for a new algorithm to feed

Now, holding our gold isn't par for the brand

Our silver is sat in the palm of your hand

Quit whining and sign on the line in the sand

The supply does not get to make the demands

(chorus)

Arasaka Manufacturing. Building a better tomorrow

Name, age, qualifications

Race, faith, career aspirations

Political leaning, daily commute

Marital status, favourite fruit

Family, browser, medical history

Hobbies, interests, brand affinity

Fashion, style, your occupation

Gender identity, orientation

Lifestyle choices, dietary needs

The marketing contact you choose to receive

Posts, likes, employers, friends

Social bias, exploitable trends

Tastes, culture, phone of choice

Facial structure, the tone of your voice

If it's inside your head, we know

You can't escape the ebb and flow

(chorus)

When guiding the hand of the market

If it's holding a cheque or a gun

The fingers go deep in your pockets

And you can live under the thumb

You seem so surprised, what did you expect?

We're thinking outside of that box that you checked

The terms were presented in full to inspect

You scrolled to the end just to get to "Accept"

Arasaka would like to know your location

Arasaka would like to know your location

Arasaka would like to know your location

Arasaka would like to know your location

[forexindicatorcashpowerdownload]

AUDUSD Aussie 0.20 Lots Buy entry bullish wave on M5 timeframe opens and running to next week [AUDUSD,M5].

Official Website: wWw.ForexCashpowerIndicator.com . Forex Cashpower Indicator metatrader4 license with NO LAG & NON REPAINT buy and sell Signals with Smart algorithms that emit signals in big trades volume zones. Works in all Charts inside Brokers MT4 Plataform. . ✅ NON REPAINT / NON LAGGING Signals ✅ New 2025 Version LIFETIME License 🔔 Signals Sound And Popup Notifications 🔥 NEW 2025 Profitable EA AUTO-Trade Option Available . ✅ * Exclusive: Constant Refinaments and Updates in Ultimate version will be applied automatically directly within the MT4 platform of the customer who has access to his License*. ( Ultimate Version Promotion price 60% off. Promo price end at any time / This Trade image was created at Exness brokerage. Signals may vary slightly from one broker to another ). . ✅ Cashpower Indicator Works in all charts inside Metatrader4 plataform for anybroker that have mt4. It will works inside anychart that your brokerage have examples: Forex charts, bonds charts, indicescharts, metals charts, energy, cryptocurrency charts and etc. . 🛑 Be Careful Warning: A Fake imitation reproduction of one Old ,stayed behind, outdated Version of our Indicator are in some places that not are our old Indi. Beware, this FAKE FILE reproduction can break and Blown your Mt4 account.

[awakenedsalamander]

would you be willing to speak moron the Technocracy? you have very interesting takes on it and I would like to know more

Happily!

So to me the Technocracy (in its 20th and 21 century incarnations, anyway, the early Technocracy/Order of Reason is different in some significant respects) represents a view of the world that is divorced from anything other than data and hard facts. This viewpoint is not exclusive to scientism, the paradigm I discussed in my recent post on the Technocracy, and is in fact an arguable core of pragmatism itself— there are times when it is essential to put aside ideals, emotions, and speculation and work only with what you can tangibly interact with. Sometimes, you have to put aside how the world should or could be, and work only with what it provably, unquestionably is.

But if you’ve ever discussed politics with someone who keeps insisting ��well, that’s just how the world is,” rather than engaging with new ways of thinking or unconventional ideals, you’ll probably have realized that this way of looking at things can be profoundly limiting.

(Incidentally, this is why I think there’s the tendency to align most Technocrats with Stasis/The Weaver— the paradigm of technology itself can be Dynamic, Entropic, and Questing in a lot of cases, but the way the Technocracy uses it is broadly static, I think.)

Let’s use an example here, and talk about climate change. There’s a tendency to view the people most effectively driving climate change— the executives who profit off it, the lobbyists and politicians who sustain it, the demagogues and conspiracists who argue against its reality— as malevolent. They know what they’re doing, they know how it hurts the world and the people who inhabit, and they’re fine with it. Maybe some of them even enjoy it. This is basically the tack Werewolf: The Apocalypse takes with Pentex, for instance.

And that view is, to a larger extent than I think is remotely comfortable, true. Reckoning with the truth in that is part of what makes Werewolf fun, and it’s also one of the drivers on Mage’s own Nephandi.

But, I think it’s also true that most of the people responsible for ecological collapse don’t see themselves as doing anything wrong, and are instead able to just elide the details of the morality and ramifications of their industry/system/ambition and focus purely on the benefit. As said earlier, that is sometimes necessary— in an immediate crisis it can even be a godsend— but in the long-term and on a wider scale it can be quite damaging.

See, if you focus only on quantifiable data, there’s a way to look at climate change as kind of a trade-off you make for important numbers to go up. Industrialization is, economically speaking, incredibly beneficial, the advancement of technology improves not only wealth, but also security, communication, and even quality of life, and from the point of view of certain fields (at least as they currently exist) like agriculture, commercial shipping, energy production, and so on, the policies that really combat the bad effects of climate change would be disastrous! Can’t we afford a few more degrees Celsius for all that?

And if you want to get really dark, there’s the fact that wealthy countries and their oligarchs are going to be the least affected by natural disasters, resource conflicts, and pandemics. It won’t be easy, sure, but nothing ever is, and from a realpolitik standpoint, if other nations (which are potential threats after all) suffer those bad effects more than you do, then maybe weathering the storm is tactically viable…

So all in all, don’t pump the brakes, and certainly don’t reinvent the wheel here! We’ve got a good thing going, and it could be chaos to stop it! Hell, with all the benefits we’re getting, we might even invent some gadget or technique to solve the worst of it.

But of course, this misses so much. In the same way that topics I wanted to touch on, like algorithmic culture and automation, may have valuable benefits from certain points of view, you have to look at the whole picture. With climate change, you already see mass extinctions, and no amount of restorative cloning is going to reverse the ecological damage there. We’re going to see an increase in displacement and homelessness by disasters and the need for people to relocate from dangerous areas, which will ruin lives, if not end them. To say nothing of the inhumanity of allowing suffering on this scale when something can be done about it, right now!

But how do you prove that “ecological damage,” “ruined lives,” and “inhumanity” are worse than the loss of trillions+ of dollars which we’d have to spend to avoid them? It’s apples to oranges— no, it’s the abstract to the concrete. If someone only wants to think about the numbers, then there’s at least a debate. There’s cost benefit analysis and logistic comparison— but not action.

Now, I am simplifying significantly here. There are many reasons that climate change and other societal crises aren’t addressed beyond scientism, or political inertia, or even just greed and selfishness. To name a few, we also struggle against ignorance, against fear, against exhaustion, against bigotry, against the unknown. It’s not so simple. One of the problems with the worldview I’m attacking is its tendency to simplify things by smoothing over the issues, so I don’t want to do that.

But I do think that the biggest issues in our society can’t be tackled with cold math and a focus on what nets the best cost-to-benefit ratio. I think in a lot of cases, that kind of thinking— which, to bring it back to the point, is the kind of thinking the Technocracy embodies— is what got us these issues in the first place.

God, was this too serious for a World of Darkness discussion?

Anyway, thanks for the question! I appreciate the chance to analyze the topic.

[humanrightsupdates]

ILO: Adopt Binding Treaty to Protect ‘Gig’ Workers

Joint Declaration Calls for New UN Standards on Decent Work

(Geneva) – Governments and employers’ representatives at the International Labour Organization (ILO) conference should agree to a new treaty to protect “gig” workers, 33 civil society groups, trade unions, and human rights organizations said today. The groups released a joint declaration during the second day of the 113th session of the International Labour Conference in Geneva, which is meeting until June 12, 2025.

The groups highlighted the urgent need to address critical gaps in labor protections in the rapidly expanding platform economy, where companies recruit workers to perform jobs or “gigs” offered through apps or websites. Platform workers frequently experience employment misclassification, low and fluctuating income, lack of social security, and barriers to unionizing, while being surveilled and managed by unaccountable and untransparent algorithmic systems. Adopting an ILO convention and an accompanying nonbinding recommendation that provides guidance on the convention’s obligations is crucial for protecting platform workers’ rights.

“Platform companies profit enormously from a business model that strips workers of their rights,” said Lena Simet, senior economic justice researcher and advocate at Human Rights Watch. “The adoption of a Convention and Recommendation would send a powerful signal that technological change should not come at the cost of human rights.”

[algos11]

In the dynamic and fast-paced world of financial markets, traders are constantly seeking an edge that can give them a competitive advantage. Algorithmic trading, or algo trading, has become increasingly popular as it offers a way to automate trading strategies and execute orders at a speed and precision that human traders find challenging to match.

[wigilham]

How to Trade Indices Signals in 2025?

In 2025, indices trading stands out as a popular strategy for those seeking to trade the broader market rather than individual stocks. For both new and experienced traders, indices trading offers a way to gain exposure to a basket of stocks within a specific sector, region, or market. 

As more traders turn to indices for their investment portfolios, understanding how to trade indices signals has become more important than ever. 

What is Indices Trading? 

Indices trading refers to buying and selling contracts that track the performance of a group of stocks. Instead of trading individual stocks, traders can trade indices that represent the collective performance of a basket of companies, typically from a specific industry or market.

Some of the most popular indices include:

S&P 500 (USA): Represents the 500 largest companies in the U.S.

FTSE 100 (UK): Includes 100 of the largest companies listed on the London Stock Exchange.

DAX 30 (Germany): Composed of 30 major German companies.

Nikkei 225 (Japan): Tracks 225 major companies in Japan.

By trading indices, you are speculating on the overall movement of the index, rather than the performance of an individual stock. This makes indices trading an attractive choice for traders looking to diversify their portfolios and reduce the risk that comes with trading single stocks.

Here’s how to effectively trade indices signals in 2025:

Trading indices signals involves using indicators or strategies that suggest when to buy or sell a particular index. These signals are often derived from technical analysis, market news, or economic indicators. 

Understand Indices Signals:

Indices signals are indications provided by professional traders, algorithms, or technical analysis that suggest good entry and exit points for an index trade. These signals may be based on chart patterns, key support/resistance levels, market news, or other influential factors.

Choose a Trading Platform:

Ensure you are using a platform that provides access to the indices you want to trade and offers real-time signals. Platforms like MetaTrader 4 (MT4) or MetaTrader 5 (MT5) are popular for indices trading, and they often come with automated trade copying features for those who want to follow expert traders.

Follow Signal Providers:

You can subscribe to professional indices signal services that offer real-time alerts with buy/sell signals for specific indices. These services usually come with historical performance data so you can assess the reliability of the signals over time.

Risk Management:

Indices trading involves substantial market fluctuations. To protect your investment, it’s essential to use risk management tools such as stop-loss and take-profit orders. These tools help you minimize losses and secure profits by automatically exiting trades at preset levels.

Monitor Economic News and Events:

Indices are highly influenced by global economic events, such as earnings reports, interest rate decisions, or geopolitical developments. Staying informed about these events will help you anticipate potential market movements and make more informed decisions.

Conclusion:

Indices trading provides a unique opportunity for traders to diversify their portfolios and gain exposure to entire markets or sectors. By understanding how to trade indices signals effectively in 2025, traders can take advantage of market movements and increase their chances of success.

[scamornoreviews]

Is AT8XM Robot Legit Or Not? - AT8XM Robot PayPal Review

Explore the AT8XM Robot Paypal Review to uncover how this AI-driven forex trading system operates, its PayPal integration, and why it could be a game-changer for both new and seasoned traders.

The AT8XM Robot Paypal system combines artificial intelligence with PayPal integration to simplify forex trading. Learn how it works, who it’s for, and what makes it an appealing choice for automated traders.

Introduction

Let’s face it—forex trading can be a tricky beast. With markets shifting in the blink of an eye and economic news constantly rolling in, it’s tough to stay ahead of the curve. That’s where the AT8XM Robot Paypal steps into the spotlight. This AI-powered forex trading tool doesn’t just promise ease of use and smart trading; it also connects with PayPal, making transactions smooth as silk.

So, whether you're green around the gills or a trading veteran, this review will walk you through what makes the AT8XM Robot Paypal stand out in the world of automated forex systems.

What Is AT8XM Robot Paypal?

The AT8XM Robot Paypal is an automated forex trading application that leverages AI to scan markets, spot trading opportunities, and execute trades without needing constant human input. As if that wasn’t enough, it’s designed to be compatible with PayPal, adding a trusted layer of convenience for users handling deposits and withdrawals.

Top Features at a Glance

Smart AI Trading Engine

24/7 Market Monitoring

PayPal Payment Integration

User-Friendly Dashboard

Beginner-Friendly Setup

Real-Time Data Analysis

Customizable Risk Settings

This robot doesn’t sleep, doesn’t hesitate, and doesn’t complain—it just keeps scanning the forex market, aiming for profitable trades while the user can sit back and relax.

How AT8XM Robot Paypal Works

It might sound like rocket science, but the logic behind the AT8XM Robot Paypal is fairly straightforward:

Setup & Connect Broker – Users first create an account and connect it with a recommended broker.

Link PayPal – Funds can be deposited or withdrawn using PayPal, adding a layer of convenience.

Activate Robot – Once active, the robot starts scanning market conditions in real-time.

Trade Execution – Based on algorithmic decisions, it places trades aimed at maximizing profit.

Profit Monitoring – All gains go straight into the broker account, accessible via PayPal.

Pretty neat, huh? With minimal effort, users get a full-fledged trading partner running in the background.

Why Traders Are Buzzing About AT8XM Robot Paypal

There’s no shortage of reasons why this trading tool is gaining popularity:

Saves Time – No need to analyze charts all day.

Emotion-Free Trading – Decisions are driven by data, not by human impulse.

Trusted Payments – PayPal support adds an extra layer of user trust.

Ease of Use – Setup takes minutes, not hours.

Flexible Trading Options – Users can set their own trading limits and preferences.

Low Barrier to Entry – No prior trading knowledge required.

Who Stands to Benefit from AT8XM Robot Paypal?

The short answer? Just about anyone looking to dip their toes into the forex market or take their trading to the next level.

Complete Beginners – It’s plug-and-play simplicity helps new traders ease in.

Busy Professionals – They can let the bot do the legwork while they focus on other things.

Cautious Investors – The customizable risk settings are ideal for those who like to play it safe.

Experienced Traders – Automation lets them scale their strategies without burning out...

Is AT8XM Robot Legit Or Not? Full AT8XM Robot PayPal Review here! at https://scamorno.com/Robot-AT8XM-Review-App/?id=tumblr-legitornotpaypal

Security & Reliability: Is It the Real Deal?

Ah, the million-dollar question. The AT8XM Robot Paypal is reportedly backed by strong encryption and secure broker partnerships. And when PayPal’s in the mix, users often feel a bit more at ease, knowing that their transactions are protected by one of the most trusted online payment platforms out there.

Still, no system is perfect. As always, users should stick with well-reviewed brokers and do a touch of homework before diving in headfirst.

FAQs About AT8XM Robot Paypal

1. Is AT8XM Robot Paypal compatible with any broker?

Not quite. It usually works best with specific recommended brokers that support its integration and features.

2. Do I need trading experience to use it?

Nope! The platform is beginner-friendly, offering automated decisions without requiring deep knowledge of the forex market.

3. How does PayPal come into play?

Users can link their PayPal accounts for depositing and withdrawing funds, which adds a safe and well-known payment method into the mix.

4. Are the profits guaranteed?

Well, let’s not count chickens before they hatch. Like all trading, there’s risk involved. However, the robot is designed to increase the odds in the user’s favor.

5. Can I adjust the robot’s settings?

Absolutely! Users can customize risk levels, stop-loss limits, and trade sizes according to their comfort level...

Is AT8XM Robot Legit Or Not? Full AT8XM Robot PayPal Review here! at https://scamorno.com/Robot-AT8XM-Review-App/?id=tumblr-legitornotpaypal