#lolgic

[siryouarebeingmocked]

Canadian Newspaper Globe And Mail: Conservative Leader wants harsher jail sentences for repeat offender auto thieves.

Nora Loreto, self-described Socialist: Stealing cars is a victimless crime!

Loreto: Also, most people in our jails are innocent!

Loreto: As long as you use the extremely technical definition of “jail” that means “a place where people are usually held before trial and are therefore legally innocent”, which is not how it is generally used.

Loreto: I say this while ignoring how car theft means there is a victim, by definition.

Me:

Some idiot also claimed the real issue was car manufacturers making a ‘defective product’, and the “logical step” should be the government going after them for obvious collusion with insurance companies.

The intellectual titan agreed.

Even though about five seconds thought would go “wait, wouldn’t having an insecure car reduce sales? And don’t insurance companies try to avoid paying out money? And isn’t car insurance mandatory anyway?”

She has a substack post about it, and it’s, uh, special. As in Ed. (archive)

>For me, I understand a victim to be someone whose life is irrevocably impacted, negatively, by forces they cannot control.

>You’re not a victim if things can be made well through consumption.

If someone spills my drink in a bar, I'm still a victim even if they or I buy me a new drink. It doesn't un-spill the drink.

Even if I get a new car, that’s a lot of trouble to go through.

>You’re a victim if you’ve experienced something that means that you’ll never again be the person you were before.

Because no one's ever been permanently traumatized by someone using force to take their stuff. Even leaving aside the times where the thief assaulted and seriously injured the car owner.

>My immediate, half-serious reaction, that jailing people for a victimless crime is ridiculous, caught a lot of heat.

Ah, yes, the classic "I wasn't serious (except when I was)" dodge.

>Thousands of men told me how much they love their cars, how their cars hold them at night and make love to them. My emails and direct messages filled up with lots of “if you steal my car I will kill you”s and “where do you live so I can steal your cars”es. The people were mad that I could assert such a thing.

Along with the classic "let's make this a gender issue, for some reason" and "talking about the harassment so I look more like a victim while ignoring the actual criticism".

>It’s the formulation that this object is so premordial that anything that may befall a car, whether a jacking or an overpacked highway, is a personal attack on the car’s owner. It’s silly.

And naturally, a red just starts making up entirely new arguments for and assumptions about the critics from thin air instead of addressing the actual criticism.

A carjacking is a violent theft of an occupied car.

Which means the operator must a) be removed, by force and/or threat of force, or b) become a hostage of the 'jacker. Sometimes both.

It's amazing that this intellectual titan can even type while she's staring so hard at her navel. Or...another body part. From the inside.

[nerdylilpeebee]

Female privileges are not privileges. They are fucking conditional, come with explanations and are direct responses and results that of a system that was for men and created by men💁‍♀️

Just sayin.

You're full of shit and you know it. XD

First off, all privileges are situational, conditional, and come with expectations (and explanations, lol).

Secondly, if it's a system made by men and for men, women would have no privileges whatsoever. The system is for men, why would it benefit women in any way?

Ya fucking clown.

[mpov]

Op on the original thread blocked me.

@redfemmayy

I have run down hundreds of examples people gave me of shitty MRAs. Every single time the person was spouting legit hate towards women, they either never said a damned thing about Men's Rights, or declared overt contempt and hatred towards them.

Show me videos from MRAs saying you can't rape your wife, drunk women are asking for it, etc. I want proof. What MRA books? Give me titles.

Why did I bring up Karen Straughan? Because @midnight-roses-candy claimed MRAs wouldn't stand to be "surrounded by queers" when there are literal queer leaders in the movement.

Who the fuck is Pearly White? The MRM has wholly disowned "Red Pillers" regardless. In fact when there was a documentary about MRAs being made "The Red Pill" They begged her to change the title as they don't want to be associated with them.

I'm not an MRA. I have been on this site over a decade begging for a link to one solid example of MRAs being shitty. I'm still begging to this day. Will, you finally be the one to link to something real? I can only hope.

But the proof so far is always the same circular logic.

A classic example is the "Furiosa Effect". In which people decided that MRAs hated Mad Max: Fury Road. When if you actually go to MRAs, or sites they have, you find glowing reviews. There was never an MRA boycott of the film. Nothing of the sort. But then anyone who gave it less than a perfect score was an MRA, so the narrative became:

"MRAs hate MM:FR! Reviewer didn't love MM:FR! Reviewer is an MRA. (which reinforces) MRAs hate MM:FR"

But ya'll never listen to me. Maybe you'll listen to a feminist.

Give me book titles, links to videos, articles, anything. I always run them down in good faith.

[arcenciel-par-une-larme]

When I say that I expect everything and anything from this hellsite...I mean it.

For example, if you have ever found yourself wondering, "I wonder if it would ever be possible for someone with a low-as-heck view of Scripture to be so deeply lost in the maze of his brain that his self-awareness reaches critical levels and drops to the negative, and he starts accusing orthodox, Bible-believing Christians of treating God like a storybook character, even while he calls the Bible mythological in the same breath"...

Rest assured, my friend; the answer is "Not only is it possible, it has most probably already happened."

[posting-stuffies]

Original | Exclu comments

Exclus went full circle.

"I'm attracted to one gender" -> "I am bisexual". Lolgic!

[feminismisstillahatemovement]

Every time I see someone identify themselves as "cis" in their profile I weep. Yes, I'm a normal human being with normal genitalia as well. I shouldn't need to mention that in my profile because it should be ASSUMED.

A small number of people have to be hooked up to kidney dialysis machines to have their blood cleaned.

Because of this, everyone must from now on only refer to blood in every other part of life as "unclean blood".

That's the lolgic.

[horrible-monstrosity]

also the whole "improving yourself bad" thing again, but this time with the leap in lolgic that working to improve yourself means working yourself and everyone around you to death. okay gamefreak we know your bosses are working you to death but you don't need to take it out on everyone else. also, you wish to get better with no effort like the trio you're bad, you do the exact opposite of it you're bad, if you want to improve just go fuck yourself i guess

[arco-pluris]

sometimes im reformist only bc i remember some revolutionaries are favorable to punch reactionary lesbians (such as Karol Eller in Brazil)

[youtubeisaprick]

I’m just gonna post this before bed

But I neeeeeed to talk about this. Obviously some things are kept secret for the sake of avoiding pointless drama, but here’s the thing. 

On a lot of my other accounts, Psycho is a part of my username. It’s meant to describe a character of mine. Most of my users are like that. With the exception of this one and a few others.

THAT BEING SAID.

Psychopath is not a god damn slur. It is a scientific term. It gets confused with Sociopathy all the damn time. It’s not the same. PSYCHO is not a god damn slur. It’s a god damn scientific term and an edgy term. Can it be used derogatorily? Yes, just like ANYTHING can.

Someone on Flight Rising(won’t say who and I’ll blot out avatar and name) decided that they wanted to trade artwork for specific items that other players may have. I had an item that would have given me 2 fully detailed headshots of my dragons on FR. I offered said item, they agreed.

And then privately messaged me THIS

Let me just show you what went down before. Because nothing went down before. It was pleasant prior to this infuriating message.

This was my first post on the thread. I have exactly one of those items and I was willing to part with it.

Person sends me this like 6 minutes later.(I want to point out that 2 hours later I would get that message at the top there)

I send her the images of the dragons I want drawn yada yada, and then this

is what I get in response.

My final message to her is telling her I want a simple color background and giving her my non-political tumblr. Literally 6 minutes later I get that top message.

IF YOU TOOK ONE DAMN SCIENCE CLASS-NO, YOU KNOW WHAT, IF YOU WATCHED ONE DAMN MURDER DOCUMENTARY YOU WOULD KNOW THAT SOCIOPATH AND PSYCHOPATH ARE DISORDERS. SCIENTIFIC TERMS. It’s stuff like this that PISSES ME OFF.

If we’re going by her logic, I believe I have nightmare disorder(haven’t been diagnosed but I tick like all the marks). Here’s something I COULD SAY.

“Well, because I have n*ghtmare d*isorder I don’t want people talking bot n*ghtmares or making users like that because its insensitive to my nightly struggles HURR DURR.

JFC, it’s not even a slur.

[syabm]

My father

is now at that age where he sees me walk in at 1:30 PM with my lunch, and goes “what, already? You just ate breakfast four hours ago!”

Oddly enough, he also sees me with chips and a can of soda at 4 or so and goes "so you won’t need dinner?”

I think he’s gotten a skewed perspective of food needs from my mother, who will often eat a dinner or lunch that can’t be more than three or four hundred calories. Including the drink. She says she skips breakfast.

[siryouarebeingmocked]

Class, what is a “kafkatrap”?

[nerdylilpeebee]

"We should add was raised by a woman. . ."

I feel sooo dumb for not noticing that. Either both parents are bad and the dad is much worse, or tumblr resents only the father. Lolgic.

Well, hating the mother would be considered sexism, so of course most reserve their hate for the father, even when he has nothing to do with the problem.

[osapoli]

Racism is prejudice based on race. Sexism is prejudice based on sex. Don't let Tumblr try to convince you otherwise

[arcenciel-par-une-larme]

Some guy on Facebook: "I love the landscapes and scenic walks in my county, but I cannot conceal my dissatisfaction at the oversaturation of the countryside with motorways. Any highway ruins the landscape visually and aurally no matter what, but especially here we have too many, and that's not good."

Some jack*** in the comment section: "LOL, tHaT's WhAt ThE pEaSaNtS aLsO tHoUgHt BaCk iN tHe tWeLfTh CeNtUrY wHeN nOtRe DaMe WaS bUiLt 😎 I AM VERY INTELLIGENT 😎 #CheckmateTheists"

[angryisokay]

Insane take of the day: automotive assembly line workers should be ASE certified before being allowed to work on the line.

[horrible-monstrosity]

the latest kierancope is that this badly animated cringe/grin he does when his pokemon take damage is ACKSHUALLY AN EEEVIL GRIN WITH SOULLESS EYES HE'S SO PSYCHO LOL TEAL MASK WAS GOOD WRITING LOL, like it makes any sense for him to make a psycho face when his pokemon get hit under any characterization. maybe it's some part of the 'carmine said he's a sore loser and has an ego, quick interpret everything he does as bad as possible!!' chain of lolgic, because you know no one else in the pokemon universe gets upset about losing battles... no one... especially not carmine by the way