#ml datasets

[nostalgebraist]

Due to recent experiences, I am feeling an urge to make an anti-drug-style PSA except it's warning impressionable machine-learning-curious teens to never, ever try a thing called "Huggingface transformers Trainer"

Not. Even. Once.

[smcs-psi]

Smcs- psi is Best machine learning company

SMCS-Psi Pvt. Ltd. is poised to make a significant impact in the field of genomics services for bioinformatics applications. By leveraging the latest advancements in bioinformatics, the company is dedicated to providing its clients with comprehensive and reliable services that will unlock new frontiers in scientific research and medical breakthroughs. Smcs- psi is Best machine learning company

View More at: https://www.smcs-psi.com/

[shannoneichorn]

Okay, but who was so bad at liking wolves that they only included snow photos? Where are your wolf puppies with spring flower photos? Where are your wolves playing in the grass photos? How did you do worse than a random wolf calendar I had in 2003?

There was a paper in 2016 exploring how an ML model was differentiating between wolves and dogs with a really high accuracy, they found that for whatever reason the model seemed to *really* like looking at snow in images, as in thats what it pays attention to most.

Then it hit them. *oh.*

*all the images of wolves in our dataset has snow in the background*

*this little shit figured it was easier to just learn how to detect snow than to actually learn the difference between huskies and wolves. because snow = wolf*

Shit like this happens *so often*. People think trainning models is like this exact coding programmer hackerman thing when its more like, coralling a bunch of sentient crabs that can do calculus but like at the end of the day theyre still fucking crabs.

[datasetai]

Understanding Image Classification Datasets: A Guide to High-Quality Data for AI Training

A basic problem in computer vision is image classification, which entails grouping images into predetermined classifications. To train machine learning models to identify patterns and provide predictions regarding visual input, image classification datasets are important to this process. We'll discuss picture classification datasets, their significance, and how to select the best ones for your machine-learning applications in this blog. 

What is an Image Classification Dataset?

An image classification dataset is a collection of images that have been labeled with predefined categories. These labels are crucial because they provide the necessary ground truth data that machine learning models use to learn how to classify new, unseen images. Each image in the dataset is associated with one or more labels, indicating the category it belongs to. For example, a dataset could have images labeled as ���cat’, ‘dog’, ‘car’, ‘tree’, etc. The goal of using these datasets is to teach an AI model to recognize and differentiate between these categories automatically.

Importance of High-Quality Image Classification Datasets

The quality and size of an image classification dataset play a significant role in the performance of a machine learning model. High-quality datasets, which are diverse and contain a balanced number of examples per class, can significantly improve the model’s accuracy and generalization ability. Here’s why they are important.

Better Model Performance: A well-curated dataset with a broad range of images allows the model to learn a more comprehensive set of features, making it capable of recognizing patterns across different scenarios. For instance, a dataset that includes various lighting conditions, angles, and backgrounds can help the model perform well under different real-world conditions.

Avoids Overfitting: Reduces Overfitting: Overfitting happens when a model is overly tuned to its training data and fails to generalize well to new, unseen data. A diverse dataset helps prevent this by exposing the model to different variations, which improves its ability to generalize to new scenarios.

Ensures Fair Representation: Diverse datasets are essential for building fair and unbiased models. For instance, if a dataset primarily consists of images of a particular demographic or environment, the model might not perform well in diverse scenarios. A balanced dataset helps create models that are more robust and reliable across different conditions.

Choosing the right image classification datasets to Choose the Right Image Classification Dataset

t involves understanding the goals of your project, the types of images it needs to include, and the quality of the dataset. Here are some factors to consider:

Relevance: The dataset should be relevant to the problem at hand. For example, if you are building a model to classify animals, the dataset should contain animal images. If your project is focused on objects, the dataset should include a wide range of those objects.

Size and Scale: The size of the dataset is important. Larger datasets provide more data for training, which can improve model performance. However, they also require more computational resources. Depending on your project, you might need a trade-off between dataset size and computational cost.

Annotation Quality: Ensure that the dataset is well-annotated. The quality of annotations directly affects the model’s learning. Poorly annotated datasets can lead to confusion and errors in the model’s predictions.

Balance and Diversity: A balanced dataset ensures that each class has a similar number of samples, preventing the model from becoming biased towards more frequent classes. Diversity in the dataset helps in training models that can generalize better across different situations.

Popular Image Classification Datasets

Several popular image classification datasets are widely used in the machine learning community. Some of these include

ImageNet: One of the largest and most popular datasets, ImageNet contains over 14 million images across 20,000 categories. It has been instrumental in the development of deep learning models like AlexNet, which significantly advanced the field.

CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100: These smaller datasets contain 60,000 32x32 pixel color images in 10 and 100 classes, respectively. They are often used as benchmarks for evaluating image classification models.

MNIST: A dataset of 70,000 grayscale images of handwritten digits (0-9). It’s a common starting point for developing and testing image processing algorithms.

Pascal VOC: A dataset specifically designed for object detection and segmentation. It contains images of various objects with detailed annotations.

Conclusion

Building reliable and efficient machine learning models requires careful selection of the image categorization dataset. Your model will perform well on both training and testing data if you prioritize the dataset's quality, relevance, and diversity. With the correct dataset, you may fully utilize picture data and make data-driven decisions by utilizing potent machine learning algorithms.

[globosetechnologysolution]

Medical Datasets represent the cornerstone of healthcare innovation in the AI era. Through careful analysis and interpretation, these datasets empower healthcare professionals to deliver more accurate diagnoses, personalized treatments, and proactive interventions. At Globose Technology Solutions, we are committed to harnessing the transformative power of medical datasets, pushing the boundaries of healthcare excellence, and ushering in a future where every patient will receive the care they deserve.

[roadmaperp-software]

Hugging face

🤗Hugging Face has revolutionized the world of AI, offering a powerful platform that hosts a robust open-source ecosystem for natural language processing and machine learning models. Having approximately 450000 open-source models and 90k data sets, Hugging Face is riding high and is the go-to solution for integrating specialized AI & ML tasks into your application. A perfect place for AI/ML professionals to leverage its resources and host your AI models to train and take them to the next level!!

[river-taxbird]

There is no such thing as AI.

How to help the non technical and less online people in your life navigate the latest techbro grift.

I've seen other people say stuff to this effect but it's worth reiterating. Today in class, my professor was talking about a news article where a celebrity's likeness was used in an ai image without their permission. Then she mentioned a guest lecture about how AI is going to help finance professionals. Then I pointed out, those two things aren't really related.

The term AI is being used to obfuscate details about multiple semi-related technologies.

Traditionally in sci-fi, AI means artificial general intelligence like Data from star trek, or the terminator. This, I shouldn't need to say, doesn't exist. Techbros use the term AI to trick investors into funding their projects. It's largely a grift.

What is the term AI being used to obfuscate?

If you want to help the less online and less tech literate people in your life navigate the hype around AI, the best way to do it is to encourage them to change their language around AI topics.

By calling these technologies what they really are, and encouraging the people around us to know the real names, we can help lift the veil, kill the hype, and keep people safe from scams. Here are some starting points, which I am just pulling from Wikipedia. I'd highly encourage you to do your own research.

Machine learning (ML): is an umbrella term for solving problems for which development of algorithms by human programmers would be cost-prohibitive, and instead the problems are solved by helping machines "discover" their "own" algorithms, without needing to be explicitly told what to do by any human-developed algorithms. (This is the basis of most technologically people call AI)

Language model: (LM or LLM) is a probabilistic model of a natural language that can generate probabilities of a series of words, based on text corpora in one or multiple languages it was trained on. (This would be your ChatGPT.)

Generative adversarial network (GAN): is a class of machine learning framework and a prominent framework for approaching generative AI. In a GAN, two neural networks contest with each other in the form of a zero-sum game, where one agent's gain is another agent's loss. (This is the source of some AI images and deepfakes.)

Diffusion Models: Models that generate the probability distribution of a given dataset. In image generation, a neural network is trained to denoise images with added gaussian noise by learning to remove the noise. After the training is complete, it can then be used for image generation by starting with a random noise image and denoise that. (This is the more common technology behind AI images, including Dall-E and Stable Diffusion. I added this one to the post after as it was brought to my attention it is now more common than GANs.)

I know these terms are more technical, but they are also more accurate, and they can easily be explained in a way non-technical people can understand. The grifters are using language to give this technology its power, so we can use language to take it's power away and let people see it for what it really is.

[kenyatta]

Thom Wolf, the co founder of Hugging Face wrote this the other day about how the current AI is just “a country of yes men on servers”

History is filled with geniuses struggling during their studies. Edison was called "addled" by his teacher. Barbara McClintock got criticized for "weird thinking" before winning a Nobel Prize. Einstein failed his first attempt at the ETH Zurich entrance exam. And the list goes on.

The main mistake people usually make is thinking Newton or Einstein were just scaled-up good students, that a genius comes to life when you linearly extrapolate a top-10% student.

This perspective misses the most crucial aspect of science: the skill to ask the right questions and to challenge even what one has learned. A real science breakthrough is Copernicus proposing, against all the knowledge of his days -in ML terms we would say “despite all his training dataset”-, that the earth may orbit the sun rather than the other way around.

To create an Einstein in a data center, we don't just need a system that knows all the answers, but rather one that can ask questions nobody else has thought of or dared to ask. One that writes 'What if everyone is wrong about this?' when all textbooks, experts, and common knowledge suggest otherwise.

“In my opinion this is one of the reasons LLMs, while they already have all of humanity's knowledge in memory, haven't generated any new knowledge by connecting previously unrelated facts. They're mostly doing "manifold filling" at the moment - filling in the interpolation gaps between what humans already know, somehow treating knowledge as an intangible fabric of reality.”

[elwenyere]

I saw a post the other day calling criticism of generative AI a moral panic, and while I do think many proprietary AI technologies are being used in deeply unethical ways, I think there is a substantial body of reporting and research on the real-world impacts of the AI boom that would trouble the comparison to a moral panic: while there *are* older cultural fears tied to negative reactions to the perceived newness of AI, many of those warnings are Luddite with a capital L - that is, they're part of a tradition of materialist critique focused on the way the technology is being deployed in the political economy. So (1) starting with the acknowledgement that a variety of machine-learning technologies were being used by researchers before the current "AI" hype cycle, and that there's evidence for the benefit of targeted use of AI techs in settings where they can be used by trained readers - say, spotting patterns in radiology scans - and (2) setting aside the fact that current proprietary LLMs in particular are largely bullshit machines, in that they confidently generate errors, incorrect citations, and falsehoods in ways humans may be less likely to detect than conventional disinformation, and (3) setting aside as well the potential impact of frequent offloading on human cognition and of widespread AI slop on our understanding of human creativity...

What are some of the material effects of the "AI" boom?

Guzzling water and electricity

The data centers needed to support AI technologies require large quantities of water to cool the processors. A to-be-released paper from the University of California Riverside and the University of Texas Arlington finds, for example, that "ChatGPT needs to 'drink' [the equivalent of] a 500 ml bottle of water for a simple conversation of roughly 20-50 questions and answers." Many of these data centers pull water from already water-stressed areas, and the processing needs of big tech companies are expanding rapidly. Microsoft alone increased its water consumption from 4,196,461 cubic meters in 2020 to 7,843,744 cubic meters in 2023. AI applications are also 100 to 1,000 times more computationally intensive than regular search functions, and as a result the electricity needs of data centers are overwhelming local power grids, and many tech giants are abandoning or delaying their plans to become carbon neutral. Google’s greenhouse gas emissions alone have increased at least 48% since 2019. And a recent analysis from The Guardian suggests the actual AI-related increase in resource use by big tech companies may be up to 662%, or 7.62 times, higher than they've officially reported.

Exploiting labor to create its datasets

Like so many other forms of "automation," generative AI technologies actually require loads of human labor to do things like tag millions of images to train computer vision for ImageNet and to filter the texts used to train LLMs to make them less racist, sexist, and homophobic. This work is deeply casualized, underpaid, and often psychologically harmful. It profits from and re-entrenches a stratified global labor market: many of the data workers used to maintain training sets are from the Global South, and one of the platforms used to buy their work is literally called the Mechanical Turk, owned by Amazon.

From an open letter written by content moderators and AI workers in Kenya to Biden: "US Big Tech companies are systemically abusing and exploiting African workers. In Kenya, these US companies are undermining the local labor laws, the country’s justice system and violating international labor standards. Our working conditions amount to modern day slavery."

Deskilling labor and demoralizing workers

The companies, hospitals, production studios, and academic institutions that have signed contracts with providers of proprietary AI have used those technologies to erode labor protections and worsen working conditions for their employees. Even when AI is not used directly to replace human workers, it is deployed as a tool for disciplining labor by deskilling the work humans perform: in other words, employers use AI tech to reduce the value of human labor (labor like grading student papers, providing customer service, consulting with patients, etc.) in order to enable the automation of previously skilled tasks. Deskilling makes it easier for companies and institutions to casualize and gigify what were previously more secure positions. It reduces pay and bargaining power for workers, forcing them into new gigs as adjuncts for its own technologies.

I can't say anything better than Tressie McMillan Cottom, so let me quote her recent piece at length: "A.I. may be a mid technology with limited use cases to justify its financial and environmental costs. But it is a stellar tool for demoralizing workers who can, in the blink of a digital eye, be categorized as waste. Whatever A.I. has the potential to become, in this political environment it is most powerful when it is aimed at demoralizing workers. This sort of mid tech would, in a perfect world, go the way of classroom TVs and MOOCs. It would find its niche, mildly reshape the way white-collar workers work and Americans would mostly forget about its promise to transform our lives. But we now live in a world where political might makes right. DOGE’s monthslong infomercial for A.I. reveals the difference that power can make to a mid technology. It does not have to be transformative to change how we live and work. In the wrong hands, mid tech is an antilabor hammer."

Enclosing knowledge production and destroying open access

OpenAI started as a non-profit, but it has now become one of the most aggressive for-profit companies in Silicon Valley. Alongside the new proprietary AIs developed by Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Meta, X, etc., OpenAI is extracting personal data and scraping copyrighted works to amass the data it needs to train their bots - even offering one-time payouts to authors to buy the rights to frack their work for AI grist - and then (or so they tell investors) they plan to sell the products back at a profit. As many critics have pointed out, proprietary AI thus works on a model of political economy similar to the 15th-19th-century capitalist project of enclosing what was formerly "the commons," or public land, to turn it into private property for the bourgeois class, who then owned the means of agricultural and industrial production. "Open"AI is built on and requires access to collective knowledge and public archives to run, but its promise to investors (the one they use to attract capital) is that it will enclose the profits generated from that knowledge for private gain.

AI companies hungry for good data to train their Large Language Models (LLMs) have also unleashed a new wave of bots that are stretching the digital infrastructure of open-access sites like Wikipedia, Project Gutenberg, and Internet Archive past capacity. As Eric Hellman writes in a recent blog post, these bots "use as many connections as you have room for. If you add capacity, they just ramp up their requests." In the process of scraping the intellectual commons, they're also trampling and trashing its benefits for truly public use.

Enriching tech oligarchs and fueling military imperialism

The names of many of the people and groups who get richer by generating speculative buzz for generative AI - Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, Sam Altman, Larry Ellison - are familiar to the public because those people are currently using their wealth to purchase political influence and to win access to public resources. And it's looking increasingly likely that this political interference is motivated by the probability that the AI hype is a bubble - that the tech can never be made profitable or useful - and that tech oligarchs are hoping to keep it afloat as a speculation scheme through an infusion of public money - a.k.a. an AIG-style bailout.

In the meantime, these companies have found a growing interest from military buyers for their tech, as AI becomes a new front for "national security" imperialist growth wars. From an email written by Microsoft employee Ibtihal Aboussad, who interrupted Microsoft AI CEO Mustafa Suleyman at a live event to call him a war profiteer: "When I moved to AI Platform, I was excited to contribute to cutting-edge AI technology and its applications for the good of humanity: accessibility products, translation services, and tools to 'empower every human and organization to achieve more.' I was not informed that Microsoft would sell my work to the Israeli military and government, with the purpose of spying on and murdering journalists, doctors, aid workers, and entire civilian families. If I knew my work on transcription scenarios would help spy on and transcribe phone calls to better target Palestinians, I would not have joined this organization and contributed to genocide. I did not sign up to write code that violates human rights."

So there's a brief, non-exhaustive digest of some vectors for a critique of proprietary AI's role in the political economy. tl;dr: the first questions of material analysis are "who labors?" and "who profits/to whom does the value of that labor accrue?"

For further (and longer) reading, check out Justin Joque's Revolutionary Mathematics: Artificial Intelligence, Statistics and the Logic of Capitalism and Karen Hao's forthcoming Empire of AI.

[jcmarchi]

Master CUDA: For Machine Learning Engineers

New Post has been published on https://thedigitalinsider.com/master-cuda-for-machine-learning-engineers/

Master CUDA: For Machine Learning Engineers

CUDA for Machine Learning: Practical Applications

Structure of a CUDA C/C++ application, where the host (CPU) code manages the execution of parallel code on the device (GPU).

Now that we’ve covered the basics, let’s explore how CUDA can be applied to common machine learning tasks.

Matrix Multiplication

Matrix multiplication is a fundamental operation in many machine learning algorithms, particularly in neural networks. CUDA can significantly accelerate this operation. Here’s a simple implementation:

__global__ void matrixMulKernel(float *A, float *B, float *C, int N) int row = blockIdx.y * blockDim.y + threadIdx.y; int col = blockIdx.x * blockDim.x + threadIdx.x; float sum = 0.0f; if (row < N && col < N) for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) sum += A[row * N + i] * B[i * N + col]; C[row * N + col] = sum; // Host function to set up and launch the kernel void matrixMul(float *A, float *B, float *C, int N) dim3 threadsPerBlock(16, 16); dim3 numBlocks((N + threadsPerBlock.x - 1) / threadsPerBlock.x, (N + threadsPerBlock.y - 1) / threadsPerBlock.y); matrixMulKernelnumBlocks, threadsPerBlock(A, B, C, N);

This implementation divides the output matrix into blocks, with each thread computing one element of the result. While this basic version is already faster than a CPU implementation for large matrices, there’s room for optimization using shared memory and other techniques.

Convolution Operations

Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) rely heavily on convolution operations. CUDA can dramatically speed up these computations. Here’s a simplified 2D convolution kernel:

__global__ void convolution2DKernel(float *input, float *kernel, float *output, int inputWidth, int inputHeight, int kernelWidth, int kernelHeight) int x = blockIdx.x * blockDim.x + threadIdx.x; int y = blockIdx.y * blockDim.y + threadIdx.y; if (x < inputWidth && y < inputHeight) float sum = 0.0f; for (int ky = 0; ky < kernelHeight; ky++) for (int kx = 0; kx < kernelWidth; kx++) int inputX = x + kx - kernelWidth / 2; int inputY = y + ky - kernelHeight / 2; if (inputX >= 0 && inputX < inputWidth && inputY >= 0 && inputY < inputHeight) sum += input[inputY * inputWidth + inputX] * kernel[ky * kernelWidth + kx]; output[y * inputWidth + x] = sum;

This kernel performs a 2D convolution, with each thread computing one output pixel. In practice, more sophisticated implementations would use shared memory to reduce global memory accesses and optimize for various kernel sizes.

Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD)

SGD is a cornerstone optimization algorithm in machine learning. CUDA can parallelize the computation of gradients across multiple data points. Here’s a simplified example for linear regression:

__global__ void sgdKernel(float *X, float *y, float *weights, float learningRate, int n, int d) int i = blockIdx.x * blockDim.x + threadIdx.x; if (i < n) float prediction = 0.0f; for (int j = 0; j < d; j++) prediction += X[i * d + j] * weights[j]; float error = prediction - y[i]; for (int j = 0; j < d; j++) atomicAdd(&weights[j], -learningRate * error * X[i * d + j]); void sgd(float *X, float *y, float *weights, float learningRate, int n, int d, int iterations) int threadsPerBlock = 256; int numBlocks = (n + threadsPerBlock - 1) / threadsPerBlock; for (int iter = 0; iter < iterations; iter++) sgdKernel<<<numBlocks, threadsPerBlock>>>(X, y, weights, learningRate, n, d);

This implementation updates the weights in parallel for each data point. The atomicAdd function is used to handle concurrent updates to the weights safely.

Optimizing CUDA for Machine Learning

While the above examples demonstrate the basics of using CUDA for machine learning tasks, there are several optimization techniques that can further enhance performance:

Coalesced Memory Access

GPUs achieve peak performance when threads in a warp access contiguous memory locations. Ensure your data structures and access patterns promote coalesced memory access.

Shared Memory Usage

Shared memory is much faster than global memory. Use it to cache frequently accessed data within a thread block.

Understanding the memory hierarchy with CUDA

This diagram illustrates the architecture of a multi-processor system with shared memory. Each processor has its own cache, allowing for fast access to frequently used data. The processors communicate via a shared bus, which connects them to a larger shared memory space.

For example, in matrix multiplication:

__global__ void matrixMulSharedKernel(float *A, float *B, float *C, int N) __shared__ float sharedA[TILE_SIZE][TILE_SIZE]; __shared__ float sharedB[TILE_SIZE][TILE_SIZE]; int bx = blockIdx.x; int by = blockIdx.y; int tx = threadIdx.x; int ty = threadIdx.y; int row = by * TILE_SIZE + ty; int col = bx * TILE_SIZE + tx; float sum = 0.0f; for (int tile = 0; tile < (N + TILE_SIZE - 1) / TILE_SIZE; tile++) if (row < N && tile * TILE_SIZE + tx < N) sharedA[ty][tx] = A[row * N + tile * TILE_SIZE + tx]; else sharedA[ty][tx] = 0.0f; if (col < N && tile * TILE_SIZE + ty < N) sharedB[ty][tx] = B[(tile * TILE_SIZE + ty) * N + col]; else sharedB[ty][tx] = 0.0f; __syncthreads(); for (int k = 0; k < TILE_SIZE; k++) sum += sharedA[ty][k] * sharedB[k][tx]; __syncthreads(); if (row < N && col < N) C[row * N + col] = sum;

This optimized version uses shared memory to reduce global memory accesses, significantly improving performance for large matrices.

Asynchronous Operations

CUDA supports asynchronous operations, allowing you to overlap computation with data transfer. This is particularly useful in machine learning pipelines where you can prepare the next batch of data while the current batch is being processed.

cudaStream_t stream1, stream2; cudaStreamCreate(&stream1); cudaStreamCreate(&stream2); // Asynchronous memory transfers and kernel launches cudaMemcpyAsync(d_data1, h_data1, size, cudaMemcpyHostToDevice, stream1); myKernel<<<grid, block, 0, stream1>>>(d_data1, ...); cudaMemcpyAsync(d_data2, h_data2, size, cudaMemcpyHostToDevice, stream2); myKernel<<<grid, block, 0, stream2>>>(d_data2, ...); cudaStreamSynchronize(stream1); cudaStreamSynchronize(stream2);

Tensor Cores

For machine learning workloads, NVIDIA’s Tensor Cores (available in newer GPU architectures) can provide significant speedups for matrix multiply and convolution operations. Libraries like cuDNN and cuBLAS automatically leverage Tensor Cores when available.

Challenges and Considerations

While CUDA offers tremendous benefits for machine learning, it’s important to be aware of potential challenges:

Memory Management: GPU memory is limited compared to system memory. Efficient memory management is crucial, especially when working with large datasets or models.

Data Transfer Overhead: Transferring data between CPU and GPU can be a bottleneck. Minimize transfers and use asynchronous operations when possible.

Precision: GPUs traditionally excel at single-precision (FP32) computations. While support for double-precision (FP64) has improved, it’s often slower. Many machine learning tasks can work well with lower precision (e.g., FP16), which modern GPUs handle very efficiently.

Code Complexity: Writing efficient CUDA code can be more complex than CPU code. Leveraging libraries like cuDNN, cuBLAS, and frameworks like TensorFlow or PyTorch can help abstract away some of this complexity.

As machine learning models grow in size and complexity, a single GPU may no longer be sufficient to handle the workload. CUDA makes it possible to scale your application across multiple GPUs, either within a single node or across a cluster.

CUDA Programming Structure

To effectively utilize CUDA, it’s essential to understand its programming structure, which involves writing kernels (functions that run on the GPU) and managing memory between the host (CPU) and device (GPU).

Host vs. Device Memory

In CUDA, memory is managed separately for the host and device. The following are the primary functions used for memory management:

cudaMalloc: Allocates memory on the device.

cudaMemcpy: Copies data between host and device.

cudaFree: Frees memory on the device.

Example: Summing Two Arrays

Let’s look at an example that sums two arrays using CUDA:

__global__ void sumArraysOnGPU(float *A, float *B, float *C, int N) int idx = threadIdx.x + blockIdx.x * blockDim.x; if (idx < N) C[idx] = A[idx] + B[idx]; int main() int N = 1024; size_t bytes = N * sizeof(float); float *h_A, *h_B, *h_C; h_A = (float*)malloc(bytes); h_B = (float*)malloc(bytes); h_C = (float*)malloc(bytes); float *d_A, *d_B, *d_C; cudaMalloc(&d_A, bytes); cudaMalloc(&d_B, bytes); cudaMalloc(&d_C, bytes); cudaMemcpy(d_A, h_A, bytes, cudaMemcpyHostToDevice); cudaMemcpy(d_B, h_B, bytes, cudaMemcpyHostToDevice); int blockSize = 256; int gridSize = (N + blockSize - 1) / blockSize; sumArraysOnGPU<<<gridSize, blockSize>>>(d_A, d_B, d_C, N); cudaMemcpy(h_C, d_C, bytes, cudaMemcpyDeviceToHost); cudaFree(d_A); cudaFree(d_B); cudaFree(d_C); free(h_A); free(h_B); free(h_C); return 0;

In this example, memory is allocated on both the host and device, data is transferred to the device, and the kernel is launched to perform the computation.

Conclusion

CUDA is a powerful tool for machine learning engineers looking to accelerate their models and handle larger datasets. By understanding the CUDA memory model, optimizing memory access, and leveraging multiple GPUs, you can significantly enhance the performance of your machine learning applications.

[rainlover789]

28/05/25

woke up at 9:30am :\

immediately got working on my summer ml project. today I explored and analysed the dataset. beginner stuff and reallyy fun

then I had lunch & went to the movies with my bff and her mum ❤️

at night, I uploaded my weekly progress report

I have been so upset lately. My heart just feels heavy. I also haven't been able to study at all since summer vacations started. Hopefully I can get some momentum going with this studyblr. I know learning makes me happy like nothing else.

📖 – the lost world by sir arthur conan doyle

[smcs-psi]

Smcs- psi is Best Smcs- psi is Best large machine learning datasets

SMCS-Psi Pvt. Ltd. is poised to make a significant impact in the field of genomics services for bioinformatics applications. By leveraging the latest advancements in bioinformatics, the company is dedicated to providing its clients with comprehensive and reliable services that will unlock new frontiers in scientific research and medical breakthroughs. Smcs- psi is Best Smcs- psi is Best large machine learning datasets

View More at: https://www.smcs-psi.com/

[beakers-and-telescopes]

Okay, I have my own opinions about AI, especially AI art, but this is actually a very cool application!

So when you think about it, we can quantify vision/sight using the actual wavelengths of light, and we can quantify hearing using frequency, but there really isn't a way to quantify smell. So scientists at the University of Reading set out to create an AI to do just that.

The AI was trained on a dataset of 5000 known odor-causing molecules. It was given their structures, and a list of various scent descriptors (such as "floral sweet" or "musty" or "buttery") and how well those descriptors fit on a scale of 1-5. After being trained on this data, the AI was able to be shown a new molecule and predict what its scent would be, using the various descriptors.

The AI's prediction abilities were compared against a panel of humans, who would smell the compound of interest and assign the descriptors. The AI's predictions were actually just as good as the human descriptions. Professor Jane Parker, who worked on the project, explained the following.

"We don't currently have a way to measure or accurately predict the odor of a molecule, based on its molecular structure. You can get so far with current knowledge of the molecular structure, but eventually you are faced with numerous exceptions where the odor and structure don't match. This is what has stumped previous models of olfaction. The fantastic thing about this new ML generated model is that it correctly predicts the odor of those exceptions"

Now what can we do with this "AI Nose", you might ask? Well, it may have benefits in the food and fragrance industries, for one. A machine that is able to quickly filter through compounds to find one with specific odor qualities could be a good way to find new, sustainable sources of fragrance in foods or perfumes. The team also believes that this "scent map" that the AI model builds could be linked to metabolism. In other words, odors that are close to each other on the map, or smell similar, are also more likely to be metabolically related

[globosetechnologysolution]

OCR technology has revolutionized data collection processes, providing many benefits to various industries. By harnessing the power of OCR with AI, businesses can unlock valuable insights from unstructured data, increase operational efficiency, and gain a competitive edge in today's digital landscape. At Globose Technology Solutions, we are committed to leading innovative solutions that empower businesses to thrive in the age of AI.