#shared values

[kimchicuddles]

I know a lot of people on "my team" disagree with me about this, but I really do think that there's a beautiful spark of humanity within everyone, even the people who it seems want me to die. And maybe I'll never connect with it in everyone, but it's important to me to at least look for it...

Thank you so much for supporting my work! patreon.com/kimchicuddles

text reads:

It's interesting to me how often criticisms people have about "the other side" sound completely identical to each other...

(both thinking) "what an intolerant, miserable, brainwashed person!! If only they were open-minded like ME!"

But I wonder if we looked beneath all our strategies (and the symbols we use to represent them), how often the core is actually a shared hope for humanity... And I wonder how we can reach towards that, to lift each other up?

[omegaphilosophia]

The Philosophy of Community

The philosophy of community explores the fundamental nature, purpose, and significance of communities within human life. It examines how individuals relate to each other within a community, the values that bind them together, and the impact of communal life on personal and collective well-being. This philosophical inquiry involves a blend of ethical, social, political, and cultural dimensions, focusing on the essence of communal bonds and their influence on human existence.

Key Concepts in the Philosophy of Community

Interconnectedness and Interdependence:

Communities are built on the understanding that individuals are interconnected and interdependent. This interconnectedness fosters mutual support, cooperation, and shared responsibilities, which are essential for the survival and flourishing of both individuals and the group.

Shared Values and Norms:

Communities are often defined by shared values, norms, and cultural practices. These shared elements provide a sense of identity and belonging, guiding behavior and establishing a framework for social harmony and cohesion.

Common Good:

The concept of the common good is central to the philosophy of community. It emphasizes that the well-being of the community as a whole is paramount and that individual interests should align with or contribute to this collective well-being.

Solidarity and Social Justice:

Solidarity refers to the unity and support among members of a community, particularly in times of need. Social justice within a community involves ensuring fair treatment, equitable distribution of resources, and opportunities for all members, promoting inclusivity and equality.

Identity and Belonging:

A strong sense of community fosters a sense of identity and belonging among its members. This psychological and emotional connection can provide meaning, purpose, and support, enhancing individual and collective well-being.

Dialogue and Participation:

Effective communities encourage open dialogue and active participation. This involves inclusive decision-making processes where all members have a voice, fostering democratic principles and ensuring that the community's direction aligns with the collective will.

Autonomy and Responsibility:

While communities support interdependence, they also recognize the importance of individual autonomy. Balancing personal freedom with communal responsibilities is crucial for maintaining both individual rights and the integrity of the community.

Theories and Philosophical Perspectives

Communitarianism:

Communitarianism emphasizes the importance of community in shaping individuals' values, identities, and well-being. It argues that individual rights and freedoms are best understood and exercised within the context of community responsibilities and social practices.

Social Contract Theory:

Social contract theory explores the agreements and implicit contracts that form the basis of communal living. Philosophers like Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau have different views on the nature of these contracts and the balance between individual freedom and communal obligations.

Civic Republicanism:

Civic republicanism focuses on active citizenship and participation in communal life as essential for personal fulfillment and the health of the community. It stresses the importance of civic virtue, public-mindedness, and the common good.

Marxism and Critical Theory:

These perspectives analyze the role of economic and power structures in shaping communities. They critique how inequalities and class divisions impact communal relations and advocate for more equitable and just communal arrangements.

Personalism:

Personalism emphasizes the inherent dignity and worth of each individual within a community. It advocates for a community structure that respects and uplifts individual personhood while fostering strong, supportive relationships.

The philosophy of community delves into the intricate balance between individual and collective interests, exploring how communities can support human flourishing through shared values, mutual support, and collective action. By examining the ethical, social, and political dimensions of communal life, this philosophical inquiry helps us understand the profound impact of community on personal identity, well-being, and societal development.

[unesco-bmw]

Why do we love one another?

The experience of love is a complex and multifaceted emotion that can be influenced by various factors. While the specific reasons why we love one another can vary from person to person, there are several common themes and explanations that contribute to the experience of love:

Emotional Connection: Love often arises from a deep emotional connection between individuals. This connection can be fostered through shared experiences, mutual understanding, empathy, and emotional intimacy.

Compatibility: Love can be fueled by a sense of compatibility and shared values, interests, and goals. When we find someone who aligns with our core beliefs and desires, it can create a strong bond and a sense of belonging.

Physical Attraction: Physical attraction can play a role in the experience of love. Our brains and bodies are wired to respond to certain physical characteristics, and attraction can be a catalyst for developing emotional connections.

Support and Care: Love often involves feelings of care, support, and nurturing. When we feel loved, we experience a sense of security, knowing that there is someone who will be there for us, provide emotional support, and help us navigate life's challenges.

Shared Values and Beliefs: Love can be strengthened by shared values, beliefs, and a sense of common purpose. When we find someone who shares our worldview and has similar aspirations, it can deepen the connection and foster a sense of unity.

Chemical and Biological Factors: Love is also influenced by chemical and biological factors. Hormones like oxytocin and dopamine play a role in creating feelings of attachment, pleasure, and bonding.

It's important to note that love is a subjective and individual experience, and the reasons why we love one another can vary greatly from person to person. Love is a deep and complex emotion that can be shaped by personal experiences, cultural influences, and individual preferences.

[prescott-az]

So a local indivisible group is just starting up and I made them this flyer. I'm putting it here because I want you to notice how I turned it into a shared values thing. This is not about Democrats and Republicans. The original they sent me said "meet other liberals". 🙄

https://open.substack.com/pub/lfitzhugh/p/divided-by-design-propaganda-power

.

[corporateintel]

Knowing You Are There

It has been a harrowing start to 2025. The change in Presidential administrations has further divided the nation. My own sense of the shared values that I presumed were unquestionable leaves me confused. I can’t make sense of the logic patterns laying the foundation for our future. The disorientation of those with opposing views seems to be intentional, and sadly, effective. Closer to home, the…

[sonisjs]

A Safal (Fruitful/ Rewarding) Relationship

What is the meaning in plain English of word ‘SAFAL’ (an adjective in Hindi language)? This means and implies – Successful, Fruitful, or Rewarding. Then what do we interpret by the term ‘Safal Relationship’? This means – A relationship which yields positive outcomes, rewards, results, or fallout for both or concerned parties involved. You may be wondering why I have chosen this issue, which…

[civicsavvy]

Part 4: The Forgotten Consensus: Shared Values Across Divides

In an era marked by intense polarization, it is easy to overlook the core values that unite individuals across political, social, and cultural divides. Despite the rhetoric that suggests an irreconcilable divide among Americans, many underlying principles remain widely held. These shared values—such as freedom, justice, community, and the pursuit of happiness—form the foundation of American identity and provide a pathway for reconnecting amidst discord.

Highlighting Underlying Values

At the heart of American society lies a commitment to fundamental principles that resonate across political ideologies. These include:

Freedom: The desire for individual liberties is a cornerstone of American life. Whether one leans left or right, the importance of personal freedom—be it freedom of speech, religion, or choice—is a shared value that transcends political affiliation. This commitment to freedom serves as a rallying point for diverse groups, allowing for conversations about rights and responsibilities that foster mutual respect.

Justice: The pursuit of justice is a common aspiration that motivates many social movements and civic actions. While interpretations of justice may vary, the fundamental belief in fairness and equity resonates with people across the political spectrum. Acknowledging this shared commitment can pave the way for constructive discussions about reform and accountability within systems of governance and society.

Community: The value of community and connection is another unifying factor. Regardless of political beliefs, most people yearn for belonging, support, and the ability to contribute to the greater good. Emphasizing community engagement and collective well-being can help bridge divides and encourage collaboration on local initiatives that benefit everyone.

The Pursuit of Happiness: The idea that everyone should have the opportunity to pursue their version of happiness is a fundamental American ideal. This principle can encourage dialogue about social and economic policies, allowing for discussions that focus on creating environments where individuals can thrive.

Evidence of “Deep Agreement” on Key Issues

Research has shown that beneath the surface-level disagreements, there exists a “deep agreement” on many critical issues. Studies by organizations such as the Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI) and the Pew Research Center reveal that, on several key issues, majorities across political affiliations share similar concerns and aspirations.

Economic Opportunity: Across party lines, there is a consensus that economic opportunity should be accessible to all. Many Americans believe in the importance of providing pathways for upward mobility, supporting education, and creating job opportunities for those struggling to make ends meet.

Healthcare: While specific policy preferences may differ, the overarching belief that access to healthcare is a fundamental right is prevalent among many Americans. This shared concern can drive discussions about how to reform the healthcare system in a way that aligns with shared values.

Environmental Protection: Concerns about environmental degradation and the desire for sustainable practices are common sentiments among diverse groups. The acknowledgment of our shared responsibility to protect the planet can serve as a unifying cause that transcends partisan divides.

Safety and Security: The need for personal and community safety is a universal concern. While approaches to achieving safety may differ, the underlying desire for secure environments is a common ground that can facilitate cooperation on issues like crime reduction and public safety.

Emphasizing Shared Beliefs Amid Disagreements on Specific Policies

While policy disagreements are inevitable in a democratic society, emphasizing shared beliefs can help mitigate polarization and foster a culture of collaboration. Here are some strategies to highlight these common values:

Focus on Common Goals: In discussions around contentious issues, it is essential to frame conversations in terms of shared goals rather than partisan divides. By articulating a collective vision for the future—such as improved healthcare access, economic prosperity, or environmental stewardship—individuals can align their interests toward common objectives.

Encourage Dialogue Over Debate: Shift the focus from adversarial debate to open dialogue. Create spaces where individuals can share their experiences and perspectives without fear of judgment. Encourage active listening and the exploration of underlying motivations, which can reveal shared values even when specific policy preferences differ.

Celebrate Local Initiatives: Highlight local examples of cooperation and community-building that transcend political divides. By showcasing successful collaborative efforts on issues like education, public health, or infrastructure, individuals can see the potential for collective action, inspiring broader movements for unity.

Utilize Storytelling: Personal narratives can be powerful tools for connecting with others. By sharing stories that reflect common struggles, hopes, and aspirations, individuals can humanize issues and foster empathy. Storytelling allows people to relate to one another on a deeper level, moving beyond political labels and fostering understanding.

Engage in Community Activities: Encourage participation in community service projects, town hall meetings, or local events that bring diverse groups together. Engaging in shared activities fosters connections and reinforces a sense of community, reminding individuals of their shared humanity.

Conclusion: Reclaiming the Narrative of Unity

In a time characterized by polarization, reclaiming the narrative of unity requires an active commitment to recognizing and celebrating the shared values that bind us together. By focusing on underlying principles like freedom, justice, and community, and by embracing the evidence of deep agreement on key issues, individuals can transcend divisions and work toward common goals.

In the following part, attention will be given to how universities and educational institutions shape social attitudes and political beliefs, emphasizing the need for balanced discourse and intellectual diversity. This section will discuss the pivotal role of academia in cultivating critical thinking and promoting a broad-minded approach to differing perspectives.

Part 5: The Role of Universities and Education in Shaping Perspectives

In today's polarized landscape, educational institutions wield substantial power in shaping societal attitudes, beliefs, and political perspectives. Universities and colleges have historically been spaces for intellectual exploration, free expression, and rigorous debate. Yet, in recent years, some argue that academia has shifted, increasingly reflecting specific ideologies that may discourage genuine critical thinking and open dialogue. This chapter delves into the role of universities in shaping beliefs, examines the challenges posed by ideological conformity, and considers ways that educational institutions can foster a more balanced, open-minded approach.

Influence of Academia on Social Attitudes and Political Beliefs

Higher education plays a significant role in shaping the values, norms, and ideologies of students. For many, college years are formative, marking the first time they encounter diverse perspectives and engage in deep self-reflection. As such, universities serve as cultural incubators, influencing the trajectory of social and political beliefs in broader society. For instance, studies show that students are more likely to emerge from college with progressive attitudes, especially regarding social issues such as gender equality, racial justice, and environmental concerns.

However, there is ongoing debate over the extent to which this shift reflects a genuine exploration of diverse ideas versus an environment that encourages specific perspectives. Some researchers argue that the ideological leanings of faculty members and the overall culture on many campuses can unintentionally create an "echo chamber" effect, where certain views are amplified while others are marginalized. As a result, students may feel pressured to adopt mainstream opinions or risk social alienation.

Ideological Conformity and Its Consequences

The issue of ideological conformity within academic settings has been widely discussed in recent years, with concerns about "groupthink" emerging in some disciplines. In an environment where a particular ideological framework dominates, students and faculty members may be discouraged—whether directly or subtly—from expressing dissenting opinions. This creates a culture where individuals may avoid questioning widely accepted beliefs, inhibiting the kind of critical thinking that universities aim to foster.

This conformity can have several consequences. First, it undermines the principle of academic freedom, limiting the scope of inquiry and hindering intellectual diversity. When certain perspectives are sidelined or dismissed outright, the result is a partial, and sometimes distorted, view of complex social and political issues. Second, ideological conformity can create a polarized campus environment, where students perceive "acceptable" and "unacceptable" opinions, stifling productive discussion and discouraging genuine curiosity.

Moreover, the consequences of this culture extend beyond the walls of academia. Graduates who have primarily been exposed to a narrow range of views may be less prepared to navigate diverse perspectives in the workforce and society at large. As they enter professional and civic life, they may struggle to engage with others who hold different beliefs, perpetuating the broader polarization we see in society.

Fostering Critical Thinking and Open Dialogue

To counteract these tendencies, universities must prioritize critical thinking and open dialogue, treating them as foundational skills rather than secondary goals. Critical thinking allows students to analyze information, question assumptions, and evaluate arguments, which is essential for developing well-rounded perspectives on complex issues. When students learn to engage critically with diverse ideas, they become better equipped to form their own views, rather than simply adopting prevailing beliefs uncritically.

Open dialogue, meanwhile, ensures that students are exposed to a range of viewpoints, helping to foster empathy and understanding. By facilitating respectful conversations across ideological divides, universities can create an environment where students feel safe expressing different perspectives. This approach not only enriches students' academic experiences but also prepares them to be thoughtful, open-minded citizens.

To achieve this, universities can implement several strategies:

Encourage Ideological Diversity Among Faculty and Guest Speakers: By actively seeking faculty and speakers from diverse ideological backgrounds, universities can expose students to a broader range of perspectives. This helps prevent an echo chamber effect and ensures that students encounter ideas they might not otherwise encounter.

Establish Forums for Structured Debate: Organized debates, panel discussions, and dialogue sessions can provide structured opportunities for students to engage with contrasting viewpoints. When these events are moderated effectively, they can serve as valuable educational experiences, teaching students how to engage in respectful, constructive debate.

Incorporate Critical Thinking into the Curriculum: Critical thinking skills should be explicitly taught and emphasized throughout the curriculum, regardless of discipline. Assignments and assessments that require students to analyze different perspectives, question assumptions, and construct well-reasoned arguments can help cultivate this skill.

Create a Culture of Intellectual Humility: Encouraging intellectual humility—the recognition that one's own views are fallible—can reduce defensiveness and make students more receptive to alternative perspectives. By promoting a mindset of continuous learning, universities can foster a culture where students feel comfortable re-evaluating their beliefs.

Support Freedom of Expression Policies: Clear policies supporting freedom of expression on campus can help create an environment where students feel empowered to express diverse views without fear of retribution. Universities should make it clear that, while hate speech is unacceptable, respectful discussion of controversial ideas is both welcome and encouraged.

Case Studies: Universities That Champion Open Dialogue

Some universities have made strides toward promoting a culture of open dialogue and intellectual diversity. For instance, the University of Chicago is well known for its "Chicago Principles," which affirm the institution's commitment to free expression and open discourse. This policy has become a model for other universities, demonstrating the potential for creating an environment where students are encouraged to explore diverse viewpoints.

Another example is Princeton University's James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions, which hosts lectures, seminars, and fellowships focused on open debate and the study of American principles. Programs like these create spaces where students can engage with a wide array of ideological perspectives, challenging their preconceptions and expanding their understanding.

In both cases, these universities have recognized that fostering open dialogue and critical thinking requires intentional policies and programs. Their commitment to these principles underscores the value of a balanced approach to education that respects intellectual freedom while encouraging thoughtful, inclusive discussions.

Preparing Students for a Polarized World

The role of universities in shaping perspectives extends beyond academic and career preparation; it also includes preparing students to engage constructively in a polarized world. By fostering critical thinking and open dialogue, universities can equip students with the tools they need to approach complex issues thoughtfully and empathetically. Rather than viewing ideological diversity as a threat, they can see it as an asset—a means of broadening their understanding and challenging their assumptions.

Ultimately, educational institutions have a responsibility to create an environment where students are encouraged to think independently and engage with a wide range of ideas. In doing so, they can help bridge the divides that have become so prominent in society, cultivating a generation of graduates who are not only knowledgeable but also open-minded and prepared to build a more unified future.

[studyhelianthus]

"I value clarity and direction. I held on because there was uncertainty, and a disconnect between words and actions. Ultimately, I aim to make decisions that lead to future success for both sides. Sadly, sometimes I feel the other party isn't using discernment—and that's where the real issue lies. Heh."

"Love and Life: Some seek victory; I seek understanding, prioritizing empathy, learning, and connection over competition." – Melissa Allegories 🪻🌿🍃

[biblebloodhound]

Our Riches In Christ (Colossians 2:1-5)

Learn to appreciate and enjoy what you already have, because it really is worth exploring, living into, and celebrating.

I want you to know how hard I am contending for you and for those at Laodicea, and for all who have not met me personally. My goal is that they may be encouraged in heart and united in love, so that they may have the full riches of complete understanding, in order that they may know the mystery of God, namely, Christ, in whom are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge.  I tell you this…

[crumb-crumblet-s-crumbington]

you mean nothing to me

[feralprodigy]

“Whales elicited our smallness set against the largess of nature: they proved nature’s sovereignty and its resilience. Whales gave people cause to reflect, too, that governments had been known to be benevolent, that industries could be restrained, and that the protection of wonderment was a value shared across the planet.”

Fathoms: The World in the Whale, Rebecca Giggs

[themandalalady]

24-154 Citizenship

[liberty1776]

That should restrict every Zionist from Israel ever coming to the USA, genocide is not an American value. I don't believe Donald Trump shares the values of a real American, he seems fine with supporting genocide.

[ossie50]

The importance of shared values

When I became a freelancer, working largely on my own and being responsible for all aspects of my business, I quickly learned that life is easier, more fun and definitely more profitable when there are shared values between myself and my clients. This applies, I might add, to the values lived by the client business just as much as it applies to the values of the particular decision makers and…

[lastoneout]

the whole guilt-tripping language in posts about important topics paired with how I'm still getting bitches in my notes talking about why it's actually good to tell "bad" people to kill themselves continues to prove to me that a lot of people have absolutely no concept of social justice or activism outside of assuming the worst of and then viciously attacking strangers on the internet