#sjw feminazi

[xiuxiuthumbsucker]

Men see other men as people, but they see women as Women, and their idea of a woman is a hole to shoot their fucking load in, and maybe use for some babies, and build this disgusting suburban life with. They see women as objects for sex, or romance, they don't think that men can socialise with women without there being ulterior fucking motives, thereby talking to an ugly girl makes you a pathetic loser. And on top of all that, they see women as irritable loudmouths without a single real thought and nothing good to say. Yet they get girlfriends, and wives, and act like they love them and truly see them as people, and live their capitalistic, hellish fucking lives with a Woman they hate until their stupid little life gets snuffed out in a care home full of old, middle class, white clones of themselves. Every moment of their miserable lives practically copied and fucking pasted.

[welcometogrouchland]

Pacing back and forth rapidly rambling to my parents like a mad man trying to figure out whether or not I experienced sexism at film school today or if these guys are just assholes in a different way

[trucksquared]

if you equate trans people who don't want to medically transition to cis gnc people I'm fucking stealing something out of your house!!!!

[mishkakagehishka]

Some innovation this capitalism is breeding

[royalphantompain]

I have just started to watch Gravity Falls, and so far, I've been liking it so far.

Uhh, when I was a kid, I never watched the series, and at the time, I watched some, uhh, not really great YouTubers and this one guy made a video on how girls in CalArt Cartoons are horrible, and I run into this one video going into how horrible Mabel was and I think that was a reason I never watched it.

I may have only watched a few episodes , but I think Mabel is adorable and funny, and I think her and Dipper have a nice sibling dynamic.

[guideaus]

has anyone following me watched blue eye samurai 🤔

[shakertwelve]

Was Lustrum a TERF? I've been scanning all the text on her, but it could go either way honestly and I'm not sure if I'm giving Wildbow too much credit. Like I don't think he knew anything about trans people in 2011 given that the canon trans people in Worm are Mrs. Knott (as of the redacted 2.2) and Circus

it's hard to draw any conclusions about what type of feminism lustrum is supposed to be following because much of the little description we do get around her is soaked in early 2010s anti-sjw rhetoric (see: the unironic use of "feminazi" right next to calling her cell block "sappho central") which would describe her group in the same terms whether they were militant female separatists or moderate feminists getting smeared as man-hating dykes just for being feminists.

however, we do know that annette, who taylor regards as having been intelligent, thought lustrum had points and the women who Went Too Far didn't represent the entire movement, a view which is actually supported in ward; nailbiter is supposed to have been one of the women who did terrorism in her name, and she thinks lustrum would kill her if she knew about it. so there's evidence to suggest that she's less of an extremist herself and more of a fictionalized stand-in for the various historical activists whose movements were undermined by bad actors. (often as a result of federal intervention, if we're being realistic, but there's no indication nailbiter was set up by cointelpro.)

as for whether she's supposed to be a terf in specific...i just don't see wildbow in 2011 being familiar enough with gender politics to know that term, frankly, but the text doesn't go into enough detail about her beliefs that you could disprove it, either. seeing her a few years post-gm would give a better idea of what she's like outside the environment of the birdcage, but that would require ward to be real instead of an illusion of the demiurge, so we're left to speculate.

[resetium]

terfs don't exist moron they're just the same women who were getting called "feminazi" 20 years ago. anti-feminists have simply switched their insults from "feminazi" to "terfs, who are just like nazis" it's literally not even subtle 💀💀💀

Let me be abundantly clear for you.

The term Feminist refers to a person who advocates for women's rights, particularly in the equality of the sexes. Actual equality, mind you, not the current patriarchal bullshit disguising itself as equal.

Radical Feminist generally (keyword generally) refers to a person who advocates for women's rights at the expense of equality of the sexes. Basically matriarchy in place of patriarchy, which I frankly doubt will work, given the cultural factors required to enforce it are, get this, part of why you see so many nazi men in the first place (summary: they see their masculinity as under attack due to men sometimes but not always being painted as inherently evil/rapists).

The acronym TERF, meanwhile, means Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminist, which refers to a movement (or, in some cases, a person). This movement is aligned primarily with the political right, who do not agree with the idea that trans people do not deserve to be harassed for personal decisions, and are often not aligned with feminists. I can't believe I have to say this, but TERFs are a real thing, something that would be obvious to you if you paid attention to something that is not a perfect echo chamber (even the majority of right-wing echo chambers agree that TERFs exist, after all).

You mentioned the term Feminazi, which is a term primarily used by the same people who invented the term Social Justice Warrior, that being the political right, to silence feminist perspectives as "nazi propaganda". This term fell out of use with the recent surge in neo-nazi movements, and to my understanding has since been replaced with the more general Social Justice Warrior.

Let me reiterate that the side who approves of TERFs is the same side that popularized both Feminazi and SJW, and thus why TERF and Feminazi do not refer to the same group.

Regardless, I doubt you're interested in defending your statement, as you chose to remain anonymous, so I'm going to request that you return to the terf blog I clearly annoyed (assuming you aren't said terf blog, though it would be hilarious if you were) or come off anon so that we might grow as people together.

In the case of the latter, I promise I won't bite.

[shebully]

I know it's useless but lord forgive me I love getting into online arguments I'm like those men obsessed with their "blue haired SJWs get DESTROYED by epic libertarian" compilations but the opposite. Feminazi SJW fucking DESTROYS cuck misogynistic MRA betamale gaycels in tiktok comment section

[drbased]

JKR's racism/racial insensitivity/cultural ignorance isn't particularly special, unique or evil - it's literally just the product of an average white person of her generation. That's not to say that her racism is good, but rather this attempt to frame her as especially problematic is really tiring. White people will criticise 'Cho Chang', safely in the knowledge that their short stories where the main character's spirit animal is a kitsune and the villain has yellow eyes will never be made public.

In my lifetime, I have witnessed a cultural shift. Historically, there was this understanding in mainstream circles that your morals and your politics were kinda separate. But as the internet shifted the conversation, sympathies were extended to oppressed peoples, and it gradually became understood that in order to be a good person, you have to do things like 'not be racist' and 'not be homophobic' etc. Suddenly, everything that was considered a harmless joke was now 'under attack'. Consequently, there was a near-immediate backlash from conservative groups who wanted to preserve the social norms that meant they never had to consider politics in their actions. The conservative understanding is that 'good morals' means a good character - hard working, not complaining, good social etiquette, well-dressed, well-groomed, amenable, patriotic, 'stiff upper lip', not making a fuss, respecting your elders etc. etc. Now, they can't enjoy a good bit of bum-pinching, or laughing at a fake chinese accent anymore. Those things have now been included in a cultural understanding of what compassion is, and they don't like it. They find another way to distance it from 'real morals and good character', by using 'political correctness' as a way to make these new considerations sound cold and heartless, and 'social justice warrior' became a way to make the proponents of these social changes into over-zealous loonies, in the same vein as 'feminazis'.

I strongly believe the social changes towards anti-racism etc. are for the better, and since I joined the 'SJW' circles on tumblr years ago, I have found it heartening to see how much more consideration and compassion can be found in even the most basic of mainstream media.

These cultural changes were spearheaded by people who were already activists, and the conversations were taking place by well-meaning people, the majority of whom were already adults. There was a bit of jostling for where we should draw the line of acceptability (for example, terms such as 'stupid' and 'crazy' ended up being considered acceptable, since they were considered sufficiently separate from their origins as ableist slurs, and too widespread to reasonably remove from the average person's vocabiulary - a conversation that has fizzled out even though I would argue it still needs to be had), and these arguments were not always the most mature, but ultimately a consensus seemed to be reached on who gets to say what, and why.

Over time, however, I have watched the degradation of the initial concepts and I believe it's because of 1. a growing nihilism developed by over-exposure to world issues via the internet, compounded by the collective response to the 2016 electon result and 2. that movements are always influenced by the loudest voices - and often the ones who are willing to speak the loudest are the young people. When I first joined the internet, I was 12, and there were plenty of spaces for young people back then, but none of these spaces were particularly political. The increase in popularity of all-ages, all-demographic social media spaces meant that young people were being introduced to political concepts way beyond their understanding. I was only just 19 when I joined tumblr, and I was ready to clumsily absorb a lot of new ideas - but these days, most people are joining tumblr, twitter, tiktok and beyond as teenagers, some of them perhaps literal children. Unfortunately that means that this delicate balance of rightly criticising people for holding and perpetuating racist, misogynistic, homophobic, ableist etc. beliefs has rapidly degraded into a hyper-individualistic hellscape where what a person says/does is only used against them if they're already a public scapegoat. The overly zealous mentality of the fandom shipping war, where some ships are Evil and some are Pure has spilled out into real-world political discussions. Of course, that's not to say that this wasn't happening at the time - you had to sift through a lot of garbage - but ultimately the people at the core of The Discourse, who were leading the charge of cultural change, were adults with real political chops.

All of this is to say that there's a real irony in how The Discourse has shifted since I first came across it in 2011. The original 'SJW' understanding was that everyone in an oppressor class will say and do and think things that lie on a spectrum of 'problematic' to 'evil' - nobody is safe, everything we do is worth criticism, and it is not the oppressed person's job to coddle you and tell you that you're *actually* a good person when you continue to perpetuate real-world harm. If punching someone in the face means you're an asshole, then so does saying that women belong in the kitchen. The harm in the latter example may be less immediate than the harm in the former, but we're not children anymore, and we should be able to recognise that harm is still caused. Now, however, that aspect of 'check your privilege' is becoming increasingly muddied. There seems to be a collective cultural understanding that now, since we don't see yellowface or 'objectified women' in media anymore, the conversation is Closed, we've Solved Racism and Sexism and Homophobia and Ableism and so on. The treatment of JKR's writing and behaviour as a unique kind of evil akin to nazi dogwhistles is proof positive that people have latched onto this idea that they can 'cancel' women using all the well-meaning ideological rhetoric introduced by the previously hated 'SJWs' (often to protect women as an oppressed group!). The party line of the neo-SJW is that white women are the people that may not technically be the least oppressed, but they're the group that think they're way more oppressed than they are, and therefore deserve to be held to militantly high standards and mocked brutally when they get too out of line. In doing so they have accidentally outed themselves as not subscribing to their own beliefs; it is patently obvious that JKR's racism is nothing special or deliberate or insidious. That doesn't mean anyone has to like her, but the fact that she is clearly being singled out when no other white person (*cough* man *cough*) is.

It's been said before that white people have latched onto gender identity as a way to 'opt out' of being recognised as part of an oppressor class. Now, when we look at statistics about trans people, it's all 'trans man' and 'black trans woman'. Whiteness goes back to be omitted, invisible and assumed, with the 'trans' label being the primary descriptor of what 'type' this person is, obfuscating their relationship with white supremacy and allowing them to present themselves as Oppressed - the Most Oppressed, even. The cultural discourse has pivoted hard and fast to transgenderism, precisely because it diverts the conversation away from real-world oppression and towards easy things like language and indentity. The former makes oppressor classes uncomfortable and implies if not outright demands actionable structural change; the latter means people get to signal 'support' by putting their pronouns in bio and chanting some easy phrases. You get to put yourself on the right side of history by being trans positive, which means you never have to think too much about the other axes of oppression you may lie on. I have seen in my personal life people with centrist views, apolitical people and incels alike will all be supportive of trans people whilst not knowing or caring about any other leftist cause. The cultural discourse needed a conclusion - if 'being a good person means having good politics' is now the cultural expectation, then your average, apolitical normie needed something to signal that they're a good person without any meaninful change in their actual politics. Transgenderism was the easy pick. Mansplaining still gets to be a cultural joke whilst attack helicopter jokes are seen as a cringe product of the ignorant past. People who don't know what gender is (including trans people themselves!) loudly proclaim the support for transgender people's bravery. And people (women) who dissent are the easy scapegoat - bonus points if they're white, because then you get to pay lipservice to the discourse you are deliberately bastardising and cherry-picking from, thus the collective anxieties over actual societal change can be soothed.

[xiuxiuthumbsucker]

Men see other men as people, but they see women as Women, and their idea of a woman is a hole to shoot their fucking load in, and maybe use for some babies, and build this disgusting suburban life with. They see women as objects for sex, or romance, they don't think that men can socialise with women without there being ulterior fucking motives, thereby talking to an ugly girl makes you a pathetic loser. And on top of all that, they see women as irritable loudmouths without a single real thought and nothing good to say. Yet they get girlfriends, and wives, and act like they love them and truly see them as people, and live their capitalistic, hellish fucking lives with a Woman they hate until their stupid little life gets snuffed out in a care home full of old, middle class, white clones of themselves. Every moment of their miserable lives practically copied and fucking pasted.

[the-owl-tree]

on tiktok again (bad) and I keep seeing posts of like "how it feels to hate a female character without a gnat buzzing in your ear that you're being a misogynist" and it's just like. Well yeah you can dislike female characters but why are you using it as an Epic Liberal Own....commented my fav female characters on the videos and now we wait for tomorrow's entertainment

i don't even think this is a tik tok issue i think the "feminism has gone too far when talking about misogyny in warriors" sentiment has seeped into all platforms, with some being more egregious than others. i saw the use of the term "feminazi" completely unironically on here so like, it's not a limited issue to one platform that people have begun talking like 2015 anti-sjw youtubers.

[feminismisstillahatemovement]

Let’s take that same stupid hateful ideology that feminists say about men’s problems being caused by other men, & apply the same ideology to women’s problems: slut shaming is mostly done by women. Revenge porn is mostly concocted by other women. Men are pro-choice, women are pro-life. Lesbians have the highest rate of IPV in relationships: “Women need help in combating misogyny, reproductive rights, & DV for marginalized lesbians!” Why should we help you?? your problems are caused by women.

The fundamental problem behind it all is their ascribing collective guilt to people based on their skin colour, sex or sexuality: classifying people as groups rather than individuals.

In this the RadFems, SJWs and other identity politics types behave exactly the same way as the Nazis behaved towards the Jews. Which is where we get the term 'feminazi'.

[angelicguy]

regarding the fantano post, do you remember anything he actually did? i was around at the same time and all i remember is he posted a big anti-sjw rant where his big point was "i'm itallian so i can speak about discrimination" and then like never posted again lmao

well socialism scarecrow he mostly called people blue haired pieces of trash which i will reblog after this. idk its funny that a near 30 year old at the time was going thru his 16 year old fuck feminazis phase

[borderline-purrsonality]

If only Squirrelfemale was super extra nice and submissive to Bramanbleclaw 🥺 Really it’s her fault that Bramblealpha started training in hell because she didn’t treat him like an extra special manly boy with womanly soft kindness. Everyone knows that if a man is mean to women it’s really their fault because the women weren’t extra special nice and pretty and wonderful and subservient. Maybe if Harlotflight had just honored her future husband like a good god-fearing woman then nothing bad would’ve ever happened ever at all ⛪️🛐🛐🛐🛐⛪️⛪️⛪️ god bless Brambleboy. Anyways if you disagree you’re just a feminazi SJW misandrist 🤢❌😤❌🚫👸❌

HARLOTFLIGHT AGSGDGFHHH

[devilmaycrynetwork]

as much as people want dmc2 and DmC Devil May Cry sequel (a lot of people want that to happen, but it is getting hate for it) sadly it's not going to happen. With the politics and sjw that's been going on recently and feminazis (those who hate men, kill all men) even myself, a brown skin person hate lucia, who is nothing more than a trish copycat. fans hate lucia and wanted trish. That's why she was added as an unlockable. fans of devil may cry 1 as myself wanted dmc2 to be about dante and trish after the phone call happened. instead, we got someone who hate dante and tried to replace Trish but it failed badly. dmc2 got itsuno who is not even the creator, a lot of hate and he literally has to begged capcom to make devil may cry 3 which is the best in the story. dmc2 got so much hate it messed/confused the timeline and capcom made it nonexistent. whoever made dmc2 hate dmc1 and dante, they tried to erase what made devil may cry 1 great and it failed. as bad as this sounds it's the truth. I hate lucia because I don't identify with her as most of her fan do, i hate her because she tried to replace what was the original (Trish) and failed.

I wouldn't say that Lucia is a Trish clone, they were created by villains of DMC1/DMC2, but there was a lot of potential for Lucia's story. Especially regarding the Vie de Marli (The clan that fought alongside Sparda). I wouldn't say there are a lot of similarities between Lucia and Trish in the story. There's no point where Lucia betrays Dante, nor is she serving the main villain.

In regards to DMC2 development. Kamiya was kicked off halfway through the game, and they put some other person in charge of it. Which is what leads to the issues of DMC2. I don't think they hated the first game to make the second game worst?

I don't know how I feel about this message or at least how I should respond to do. You're entitled to your opinion. It's unsure if we're getting a dmc2 remake or a remake of the first game. It is an issue of Capcom ignoring the game instead of trying to fix it.