Some fans: Eloise is such a fake feminist, doesn't she see how some girls and women enjoy marriage? Doesn't she see how her privileges give her luxuries others don't? She's so selfish. She doesn't even use her words to support other women!
Also same fans: I wish Eloise would stop talking, like her speaking about feminism at every turn is getting old. Can't she just be quiet and let everyone enjoy the fun? Like yeah talking about women's lack of personhood without a male figure in society, or how they can't go to university, or how sometimes they marry men who will only hurt them but need to for their status is sad to see, but THE ROMANCE-
108 notes
·
View notes
!! Global Hashtag Campaign Regarding Deepfake Sex Crimes in South Korea !!
If you are on Twitter please consider joining this global campaign on September 1, 2024. If you aren't on Twitter please help spread the word about it.
This campaign is in response to the horrifying situation coming to light in South Korea about Telegram chatrooms with 100,000's of men and boys creating and sharing explicit photos of their female family members, and creating porn deepfakes of girls and women at their schools and places of work.
More information here:
I copied these details about the campaign from Twitter:
Here are the hashtags we will use but please do NOT use until your time zone on the date.
# Digital Sex _Crimes in_Schools
# Expose the Deepfake_Perpetrators
# South Korea expel criminals
# Protect Women AndGirls
# 학교_내_디지털성범죄
# 딥페이크_가해자_전원_신상공개
# 교육부는 성범죄자를 퇴학시켜라
# 딥페이크_엄벌하라
14 notes
·
View notes
Something that occurred to me this time…
… Is that Eliot deliberately brings Hardison w/ him to confront Moreau the first time. He tells Nate that he and Hardison will do it (don't worry, I also Love Hardison taking the moment to be like 'hey, are you okay?' bc those two usually express themselves through bickering so much that it clearly telegraphs just how off Eliot is being that Hardison is dropping the usual banter to be serious).
Which for one thing, says something about Eliot's confidence in Hardison in general, but also, like… Yes, Parker's probably not the choice for that introduction, it's not her style, but Nate or Sophie could also have played the part. He could have tried to go alone. But he pulls Hardison.
Obviously he's not trying to put Hardison in danger, he makes it quite clear in all other scenarios that he does not tolerate Hardison in danger (visual cues in The Gone Fishin' Job my beloveds), the others are well aware of the fact that he's Done Some Shit and are equally unaware of his connection to Moreau. And to be honest, I can't pinpoint an exact reason why I think he might have done it, chosen Hardison to be the one who finds out first. Maybe he suspected Moreau would underestimate Hardison, making him safer (relatively, if course), then someone like Nate or Sophie. Maybe he thought it would be best to have Hardison's tech skills as back up. Maybe he thought Hardison would roll w/ the punches the best. Maybe he just wanted Hardison there for morale.
I don't know, but it's a moment that didn't really occur to me the first time, but I think is actually quite meaningful in a more emotional way.
12 notes
·
View notes
Put your "On Repeat" playlist on shuffle, and let people pick their favourite song from the first five!
Tagging: @pixiegrl @chamaleonsoul @ghost-of-you @igarbagecannoteven @4thbrighteststar
12 notes
·
View notes
seeing all this debate unfold about a cis woman that produces higher testosterone levels than usual as a cis man that produces lower testosterone levels than usual has been. interesting to say the least
9 notes
·
View notes
sometimes i see queer people make low hanging anti straight jokes, and they'll often pre-defend themselves by saying straight people don't need defending as if the queer community isn't populated by tons of straight people, straight trans people, straight ace people, straight poly people. queerness doesnt exclude exclusively opposite sex attracted people and it bothers me to see these jokes and their subsequent defenses because normative society certainly rejects these folks because of their queerness and now you are inside the queer community rejecting them for who they desire. i think about straight trans folks the most who are out here under fire from normative society who turn to the queer community for support only to be inundated with sentiments like straight people are actually the real lesser than folks, and it's easy enough to say straightness is valorized in normative society so shitting on straight people is punching up, but i can't help but be keenly aware that the queer straight people tend to be queer in the ways which are often excluded from queer community. so actually yeah i do think straight people need our protection, not heteronormative culture, but individual people? yeah. the "coming out as straight" jokes are all haha good times fuck the straights until you think about the fact that straight trans people when they come out are functionally doing that. after all how many straight trans people used to think they were cis gay people. and we, inside the queer community, turn their experiences into a mean spirited punch line designed to reject them from queer community.
like sorry i just don't think we are gonna find queer liberation by trying to figure out which group we are allowed to make fun of for having the wrong sexuality.
4 notes
·
View notes