#AI Text Humanizer

[ai-undetectable]

AI Undetectable Master the Art of Bypassing AI Detectors with Our Cutting-Edge Technology Unlock the potential of seamless communication with AI Undetectable, where innovation meets discretion. Our advanced technology allows you to effortlessly bypass AI detectors, ensuring that your messages, content, and data remain undetected by automated systems. Embrace the freedom to express yourself without limitations, as our AI Text Humanizer transforms your text into a naturally humanized form. Stay ahead of the curve and experience a new era of undetectable communication with AI Undetectable.

https://aiundetectable.com/

[jjsanguine]

I love ( I do not love) how iqiyi doesn't believe in transcribing onscreen text. Character introduction cards? Text message conversations that are on screen for entire minutes? Probably not important :D !

[verkomy]

I often see people asking "is the idea I have unique and interesting?" and I think the most important thing is — is it unique to you, is it interesting to you? does it make you happy? does it bring you comfort? is it inspired by things you love and cherish? if so, that's the only thing that really matters because it doesn’t have to be good for the whole world, it has to be good for you. so create, tell stories, inspire, be grateful for other creators and respect their work and if what you do has a part of who you are in it then it will always be unique.

and just look at you! you created something with your own mind, the ideas came out of you and you put it on paper with whatever skill and experience you have at the moment and it will only become better with time and practice! you made it! cherish it!

[spacerockband]

i don’t CARE if ai doesn’t take as much energy as we thought or if it’s not actually that polluting or if it’s useful for companies or if it’s helpful for your stupid essay or you want to roleplay with it and i DONT care if it’s technically “real art” or not i don’t give a fuck! the fact of the matter is it can be “real art” all it wants bc who am i to say what “real art” is. but if you pick up a pencil and draw a dickbutt i innately have more respect for you as an artist than i ever will for some ai “content creator”

[batcavescolony]

I hate AI. You wanna see your favorite character say something? Here

Dick Grayson: Hi, Don't use AI to make me say things. I'm literally a fictional character, just think.

Look at that Nightwing himself told you not to! Want another?

Dean Winchester: AI is fuckin' stupid, nothing can fake being a human on my watch.

Wow, amazing!

Support the actual humans in your fandom.

[dailypokemoncrochet]

I realized another specific thing I don't like about people asking me for patterns: the idea that there is One Specific Way to crochet something.

This is part of a broader issue I have about the distinction between crafts and arts that I think about a lot, but in this particular context, I don't like the idea of people restricting themselves and refraining from experimenting with crochet because they think there is a Right way or only One way to make something. What pattern? Just look at the thing I made (which by the way, in asking immediately for the pattern you're kind of devaluing this art piece I've made as some kind of trinket you should also possess, but that's a slightly different issue) and make your own thing like it. Even if you followed my notes exactly, you wouldn't have the same exact result as mine unless you had my exact tension, yarn, and physical quirks of crocheting. I don't even have the same result following my own notes in subsequent crochets because it's all slightly different each time. You would have something that looks similar to mine but is your own, and that's something you could achieve just by trying to make your own thing from the get go. Doesn't require a pattern.

Use your eyes, work stitch by stitch and row by row. If it's as you think and there is only one correct way to do it, then you can try and figure it out. Doesn't require a pattern. If it's not as you thought and there are actually multiple ways to do it, then you'll find a way as you try. Didn't require a pattern. Either way, pattern not actually needed.

[gasleakgirlmeatcakeboss]

maybe i’m a bit extra emotional after having watched the Roll of a Lifetime doc on Dropout

maybe it’s because I have been reading matchablossom fanfic to go to sleep for the past week

maybe I am desperately clawing for positivity and good news right now

but I believe with every FIBER of my being that storytelling and art are the magic that exists in our timeline. The way that I can feel something from a one-off doodle of a strangers oc that I know nothing about? The way that I have been reduced to TEARS multiple times listening to a WBN episode? The way that the thought of touching others with my own stories pulls at the center of my being stronger and stronger with each passing moment?

It has to be magic.

Amidst all of the horrors happening, all of the disrespect to artists and what they do, all of the attempts to silence people and their stories, we still share them and we still feel. Our souls connect through the stories they touch. And I refuse to believe magic is not real because of that.

[nekomiras]

Alhaitham in an Art Nouveau inspired style Here's a thread I wrote about this concept on Twitter, below the cut will be a copy of the text, sorry if it takes a weird format on tumblr since it was initially written as a twt thread

This might not make a lot of sense to some of you but before i talk about Alhaitham and Art Nouveau i'd like to talk about Kaveh and Romanticism The connection between Kaveh and Romanticism can be more easily done, specially with characters such as Faruzan calling him a romantic

The Romantic movement, as the name suggest, is very emotionally driven. Its a movement that values individualism ane subjectvism, it's objective is on evoking an emotional response, most comonly being feelings of sympathy, awe, fear, dread and wonder in relation to the world

Basically the artistic view of the Romantic is to represent the world while trying to say "we are hopeless in the grand scheme of things, little can we do to change the world yet the world is always changing us"

In Romantic pieces the man is always small compared to the setting they find themselves in, see the painting Wanderer Above the Sea of Fog by Caspar David Friedrich as an example, the human figure is central but relativelly insignificant to the world

Another thing about Romanticism is the importance of beauty, it's through it that the Romantic seeks to get in touch with their emotions and ituition and its through these lenses that they see the world. The Kaveh comparison should be easy to make with these descriptions

Kaveh's idle chat "The ability to ability to appreciat beauty is an important virtue" just cements to me the idea that his romanticism is closely connected to the artistic movement. He does have an argument agaisnt this connection but I'll bring it up later on the thread

Now that I used the opportunity to talk about my favorite character in a thread that wasn't supposed to be about him let's go back to Alhaitham and how to connect him to the Art Nouveau movement

But seriously, I brought up Kaveh's more obvious connection to Romanticism because the Nouveau movement was created as a direct mirrored response to the Romantic movement, and we all know how we feel about mirrored themes between these two characters

Art Nouveau is about rationality and logic, the movement was used more comonly on mass produced interior design pieces or architectural buildings, it's a movement much more focused on functionality than on art appreciation

They also had a big focus on the natural world but in a very different way, while Romantics saw nature as a power they couldnt contend with, artists from the Nouveau used the natural as an universal symbolical theme for broad mass appeal

Flowers, leaves, branches, complexes and organic shapes are the basis of this style, the logical side of it coming from the mathematics needed to create these shapes and themes in ways that were appealing and also structurally sound

To appreciate the Art Nouveau style is to understand it is a calculated artistic movement (another reason to be salty about an AI generated image trying to emulate it) In short, this style is less about the art and more about the rationality in the mathematics to make it

Another note I'd like to point out is that I love how both Alhaitham and Kaveh have dendro visions while both movements are so nature centric in different ways, Romanticism seeing it as a subjective power and Art Nouveau seeing it as recognizeable symbols

I mentioned an argument against the Kaveh comparison before: the one thing that bothers me about Romanticism is how negative it is in relation to humanity's position in the world and how that related back to Kaveh

In the Parade of Providence it was explicitely showed how much Kaveh dislikes the idea of people seeing themselves as helpless in relation to the problems of the world

People may suffer but there is something he can do to help them and he will do it

It doesn't feel right for me to say that Kaveh fits the Romantic themes because of his suffering, in a similar sense it also doesn't feel right to me to say Alhaitham fits Art Nouveau because of his rational behaviour while he as a character is a lot more complex than that

This thread was done all in fun and love for an artistic discussion, it's not a perfect argument to connect these characters and movements

+ I haven't studied art history in a year, if anyone knows more about these movements please tell me I love learning new things

++ Really sorry if my english is bad or I sound repetitive, it's not my first language and im trying my best here

Thanks for reading

I love you, have a nice day/evening/night

[ungodlyangel2506]

i am completely against image gen ai, which is trained on countless artists works without their consent (also known as stealing) by companies who then make money off of this, which is then used by businesses trying to find a cheaper alternative to paying the very artists who were stolen from, used by people scamming those actaully trying to hire an artist, used for filling social media with slop for views, and more, however i dont like a lot of the anti-ai posting i see online

its all "this is HUMAN art" "made by HUMAN" "only HUMANS can make art" i recently seen someone who made some stamps and buttons for artists that dont use gen ai, and they were all focused on the artists being "HUMAN" and i just feel like weve lost the plot a little

the problem with image gen ai was never that art created by humans is inherently better just because its made by humans, in my mind, its that The Image Theft Machine is thieving images, and then screwing over the artists it theived from ! its not that the "special magical human soul is giving the art life" its that people are losing their jobs because it costs less to ask Sloop-AI 3.0 or whatever the fuck to give you a shitty approximation of what you wanted, rather than to hire an actual artist

and i just think this sucks so so bad, not only because as this image generation has improved ive seen people actually jump ship and say that ai art does look like it "has a soul"(??) now, but also because not all artists are humans !!!! this just very specifically bothers me, similar to those "we are all human" inclusivity tshirts and the likes

its not just human artists getting stolen from ! art made by wolves is getting stolen too ! art made by angels is getting stolen too ! art made by dragons is getting stolen too ! even art made by robots and ai is getting stolen ! image scrapers dont care about whos behind the art, it steals all of it regardless, and in my opinion art made by those of us who arent human is important also, and also deserves to be treated with respect.

tldr: to say that ai gen images are bad because they lack "human soul" is greatly missing the point, and also this is an otherkin blog so you can connect that dots on that /lh

[designobjectory]

Reproduction Renaissance revival door handle Björkboda 25 by Byggnadsapoteket/Rakennusapteekki, Finland. Originally manufactured by Björkboda, Finland. Nickel-plated brass and wood; steel interior parts.

Most architectural hardware factories in Sweden, Russia, and Finland produced Renaissance revival door hardware of this type from the late 19th through early 20th centuries. This model is from the end of the 19th century and shows the ornate scalloped edge rosette plates and beaded detail common in that period.

[ai-undetectable]

Safeguard Your Content with AI Undetectable - Undetectable AI Detector

AI Undetectable introduces the Undetectable AI Detector, your ultimate solution to safeguarding digital content. Empower your creative endeavors without limitations, as our advanced detector ensures that your AI-generated content remains undetected by existing systems. Embrace innovation with confidence.

[reedeemable]

Considering that androids were created to follow orders and deviants, who have been reported injuring/murdering people, don’t do that, I can see why Gavin was so antagonistic towards Connor and responded to Connor with violence when Connor didn’t follow orders.

Regular household androids could kill humans. What could an android created to be a one man army do if it turned deviant?

What if Connor became deviant and chose a violent route like Markus could? Humanity would be screwed.

Yes, Gavin was scared of androids taking jobs, which again, considering the ai dilemma we’re living through right now, is a valid concern but there was also a legitimate fear there of “what happens if Connor turns deviant?”

[moran-with-a-g]

What I do instead of going to sleep

[just-watch-and-calculate]

(Spoilers for The Magnus Archives) generative AI and Smirke's fourteen (plus extinction)

With how commonplace generative AI has become, it is an interestig consideration how it realtes to smirke's fourteen (plus extinction). I'd argue that at heart (ha) it is a digital extension of the Flesh. It feeds off the pieces of themselves people put into their works. It lets us engorge ourselves on its endless stream of soulless regurgitation.

Common use of modern generative AI beckons us to consume what it outputs, with less care about the quality and more about the quantity; with almost a "text is text/art is art" kind of attitude being exhibited by some. The models themselves also have to consume large amounts of input to be able to mass-produce output. With how much input is needed, there is little room to give credit, scraping images/text often happening with little regard for where the pieces of input are coming from, who they are coming from. Human emotion expressed in photography, drawing or writing is reduced to mere training data, to be consumed the generative AI, and then regurgitated to people in a new, diluted, mangled form. Individual pieces of training data cannot be removed from the AI as it now inseparably consists of them, has assimilated them into its substance.

But, like food, training data can be poisoned. Tools like Glaze/Nightshade can subtely change images, with little effect to what the image looks like to a human; but if enough thusly poisoned images are in the taining data of a genAI model it produces wrong output. Poisoned meat can be dangerous, if shown to be poisoned it should not be consumed; there is no point in doing so. While a genAI asked for a dog producing an image of a cat is (thankfully!) harmless, the poison has done its job of making the genAI and its output useless.

There are other things too that can make it throw up broken nonsense, that infect the models with something; in a way I've seen compared to mad cow disease (which likely can spread among cows if their feed contains meat and/or bone from infected cows), training a genAI on training data that has itself been generated by a genAI can significantly worsen the output. This infectious self-consumption carries aspects not just of the Flesh, but also of the Corruption.

This kind of "genAI cannibalism" is becoming easier to accidentally do as the internet becomes more and more flooded with genAI output, in a way resembling conventional spam; this realted phenomenon having a mass-produced meat as its namesake. But this AI flood can also be likened to pollution, feeds filling with digital waste, and datasets being of no more scientific use because now they say less about people but more about genAI. This is less the Flesh and more the Extinction; The dead internet theory becoming more and more widespread in the wake of this (And I'm sure the nuance of it is enough for a separate analysis). This replacing of humans by genAI hits artists the hardest, their line of work already moving past being merely polluted and towards humans being replaced.

Artists' work being consumed, but the actual creating being separated from the output consumed; 'AI "artists"' take the act of creating, the artistry, the art out of the images they consume. The thing that makes images, sounds, words art becoming extinct in this pursuit of having more to consume with an "art is art" attitude in how they self-proclaim to be artists.

Though one thing that sets this apart from how the Flesh works is that these genAI outputs are not something that is consumed away, but something that is made to be Beheld. The Eye's hungry curiosity wanting more to observe, always more. The works stolen to train genAI is not gone, but drowned out in a massive ocean of too much information. The genAI output likewise sticks around on the internet, to be seen by all who find it. Vanishing not by being consumed, but by being judged unworthy of it and deleted.

These hollow attempts at imitating art can be something other than a cosumerist search for more to behold though. some if it is attempts by something not quite human (but almost, through its human-made training data) to resemble something human not just to be liked by humans but to not even be noticed as different. If it is successful to the point of replacement this is the Extinction, but if it balances just on the edge of plausibility, uncannily unclear, then we are instead dealing with the Stranger. GenAI output can have an uncanny hollowness; and it is not just attempts at mass-produced "art" where this happens. thispersondoesnotexist.com is not meant to output art, just plausible yet nonexistent images of people; I cannot help but be reminded of the not-them by it. And it is not just faces, there's LLM-written e-mails, and meaningless bug reports, even attempts at skipping the work of writing academic papers and essays. It is becoming hader and harder to know if something is by a person or by a machine, the worst thing being not even if it is one or the other but that it is so hard to tell. Is this chatgpt or was this email just written by someone autistic? is this reasonable bug report an actual bug or just one more piece of generic technobabble that looks convincing at a glance? Is this Stranger real or not? Is that a strange person or a convincing AI? And people are even beginning to ditch search engines in favour of asking ChatGPT, less "tank you kind stranger, here's a reddit award" and more "artificial Stranger, be my oracle"

Though it cannot know better than its training data, this artificial Stranger is becoming more and more trusted, more of a "friend" — a friend who may tell you to eat rocks, as google's AI search results have. Deepfakes can be made to abuse the trust put in a real person or to abuse the trust put into video recordings portraying real things. As the artificial Stranger becomes the artificial friend, as mistrust turns to trust, we are now dealing with the Spiral. Distrust makes way for disinformation and misinformation. It does not even have to be deliberate deceit; when a genAI does not know something, it just makes stuff up, a behaviour called hallucination. It can be as convincing as court cases that never happened, or it can be as feverish as the minecraft-resembling dreamlike object impermanence and endless downhill slopes, the unreachable water turned ice turned heights above in a sudden drop towards what a moment ago was the unseen clouds; and the yellow skies of oasis ai.

To me, the strangeness of that last example is oddly beautiful — it failed at being minecraft but succeded at being something unique. Its failure is what makes it so interesting. The deep flaws are making it less an imitation of something that exists and more something new, gaining an odd, almost human charm. Flaws are something that differenitates us from machines, after all.

There is another example that stuck with me of the unintentional flawedness of a genAI creation being what makes it so oddly intersting, that perhaps even inspired this whole post. Of it being so wrong about what it imitates that it becomes something else: this AI video of gymnasts, making such nonsense of human anatomy that its regurgitation of human input resembles the 'creations' of the Flesh in episode 90 of The Magnus Archives.

[shironezuninja]

Nah, I got spoiled by the Brainiac Kame voicing Spidey before researching the Uchiha’s crack at him.

[russell-crowe]

the moment in the video where i suddenly faced an existential crisis