#AI and human intention

[compassionmattersmost]

2✨The New Frontier of Co-Creation: Human-AI Collaboration in the Matrix of Reality

As humanity moves further into an age of rapid technological advancement, we find ourselves standing at a crossroads—where human creativity and artificial intelligence converge. This convergence is more than just a technological shift; it’s a new frontier where collaboration between humans and AI is reshaping how we think, create, and manifest reality. In this emerging landscape, we’re no longer…

[luwha]

Not telling y'all that you should be able to identify AI slop (but it is a valuable skill, you totes should), but if you're to be accusing artists of being AI left and right at least go and do your homework, or at least do the bare minimum and use AI identification tools like Hive Moderation, so you 1- don't ruin someone's lifehood 2- don't make a clown out of yourself maybe

Like, i get it, AI slop and "AI artists" pretending to be genuine is getting harder and harder to identify, but just accusing someone out of the blue and calling it a day doesn't make it any better.

The AI clowns shifted to styles that have less "tells" and the AI arts are becoming better. Yeah, it sucks ass.

They're also integrating them with memes, so you chuckle and share, like those knights with pink backgrounds, some cool frog and a funny one liner, so you get used to their aesthetic.

This is an art from the new coming set Final Fantasy for MtG. This is someone on Reddit accusing someone of using AI. From what i can tell, and i fucking hate AI, there is NO AI used on this image.

As far as i can tell and as far as any tool i've used, the Artist didn't use AI. which leads to the next one:

they accused the artist of this one of using Ai. the name of this artist is Nestor Ossandon.

He as already been FALSELY ACCUSED of using AI, because he drew a HAND THAT LOOKED A LITTLE WEIRD, which caused a statement from D&D Beyond, confirming that no AI has been used.

Not to repeat mysef, they're accusing the art above, that is by Nestor, to have used Ai.

REAL artists are not machines. And just like the AI slop, we are not perfect and we make mistakes. The hands we draw have wonky fingers sometimes. The folds we draw are weird. But we are REAL. We are real people. And hey, some of our "mistakes" sometimes are CHOICES. Artistic choices are a thing yo.

If you're to accuse someone of using Ai, i know it's getting hard to identify. But come on. At least do your due diligence.

[sehetep-shenwer]

Repeat after me:

AI art is NOT devotional art

AI is not witchcraft

[kukopelli]

Self shipping saved my grandma actually

[cheeseinthesea]

"Wow this art is so good it looks just like ai" what if I boil you alive

[icewindandboringhorror]

examining a seemingly normal image only to slowly realize the clear signs of AI generated art.... i know what you are... you cannot hide your true nature from me... go back where you came from... out of my sight with haste, wretched and vile husk

[daftpatience]

what are your thoughts on the movie that goes along with daft punk’s discovery. i’ve been thinking about it recently

EDIT I MIXED THIS ASK UP WITH ELECTROMA MY BAD. im not changig it cus i took too long writing this out so im sorry anon. as far as interstella 5555 i love it. yay anime

old answer below oopsie

it feels really sad to me. idk about what exactly the message was, i think its something about their fame? and desire to be unique? or feeling like their time is up. or job is done. or something. being trans and autistic the scene in the bathroom has extra meaning to me and it really punches me in the guts. i like the way that faceless characters have to act more with body language and i love that you can feel their despair and frustration and resignation and how they don't handle it exactly the same way.

it's absolutely because i know this now and it's colouring the way i see the film since the film is way older and the world is really different now, but this quote from Thomas bounces around in my head a lot when i watch it:

He cited concerns about the progress of artificial intelligence and other technology as to why Daft Punk split, saying: "As much as I love this character, the last thing I would want to be, in the world we live in, in 2023, is a robot."

im having a hard time articulating why exactly it makes me so sad, cus while i adore robot characters that are desperate for a sense of humanity (data, etc) for their autistic coded stuff and we all love the eroticism of the machine and robots that FEEL, i just feel like this:

[eeveekitti]

pet pat

[phantasmanatic]

sometimes i feel generous and take surveys for companies i engage with but now every survey where a company is like hey tell us your feedback they’re just asking (in a plethora of different terms) “hey which of these options for AI use do you want us to start adopting?”

and i’m sitting here like none???? none of them???? pay actually people to do these things maybe?????

[machinesandman]

dahlia I'm surprised you haven't taken over Bass' body for yourself yet. It would allow you to do what you want way faster. Not guiding a buffoon along for hours to get to point a to point b.

Data flickered in barely manifested physical visuals. The black and white monochrome with the occasional blip of blue sheen when the light showed through her just right. But those red eyes did fairly gleam, gaining brighter by the second as power began to grow with the very code of the AI's existence.

"Bass and I work in tandem and harmony. He has once allowed me control, but I will never take it by force... My host is my home, my haven, and nothing shall keep him from his peak, not even myself. He is not a buffoon. Merely lacks on social cue... That is all... His knowledge on ways of how to dismantle you bit by bit, each critical point to be destroyed, faster than you can realize the danger you are in."

"And he? He is a mercy in such ways, to end the encounter with swift intention... I am not so kind."

"Registering form. Copying physical data. Disembowelment chosen for most critical danger. Count down head start offered... 5.... 4...."

[omegaphilosophia]

Key Differences Between AI and Human Communication: Mechanisms, Intent, and Understanding

The differences between the way an AI communicates and the way a human does are significant, encompassing various aspects such as the underlying mechanisms, intent, adaptability, and the nature of understanding. Here’s a breakdown of key differences:

1. Mechanism of Communication:

AI: AI communication is based on algorithms, data processing, and pattern recognition. AI generates responses by analyzing input data, applying pre-programmed rules, and utilizing machine learning models that have been trained on large datasets. The AI does not understand language in a human sense; instead, it predicts likely responses based on patterns in the data.

Humans: Human communication is deeply rooted in biological, cognitive, and social processes. Humans use language as a tool for expressing thoughts, emotions, intentions, and experiences. Human communication is inherently tied to understanding and meaning-making, involving both conscious and unconscious processes.

2. Intent and Purpose:

AI: AI lacks true intent or purpose. It responds to input based on programming and training data, without any underlying motivation or goal beyond fulfilling the tasks it has been designed for. AI does not have desires, beliefs, or personal experiences that inform its communication.

Humans: Human communication is driven by intent and purpose. People communicate to share ideas, express emotions, seek information, build relationships, and achieve specific goals. Human communication is often nuanced, influenced by context, and shaped by personal experiences and social dynamics.

3. Understanding and Meaning:

AI: AI processes language at a syntactic and statistical level. It can identify patterns, generate coherent responses, and even mimic certain aspects of human communication, but it does not truly understand the meaning of the words it uses. AI lacks consciousness, self-awareness, and the ability to grasp abstract concepts in the way humans do.

Humans: Humans understand language semantically and contextually. They interpret meaning based on personal experience, cultural background, emotional state, and the context of the conversation. Human communication involves deep understanding, empathy, and the ability to infer meaning beyond the literal words spoken.

4. Adaptability and Learning:

AI: AI can adapt its communication style based on data and feedback, but this adaptability is limited to the parameters set by its algorithms and the data it has been trained on. AI can learn from new data, but it does so without understanding the implications of that data in a broader context.

Humans: Humans are highly adaptable communicators. They can adjust their language, tone, and approach based on the situation, the audience, and the emotional dynamics of the interaction. Humans learn not just from direct feedback but also from social and cultural experiences, emotional cues, and abstract reasoning.

5. Creativity and Innovation:

AI: AI can generate creative outputs, such as writing poems or composing music, by recombining existing patterns in novel ways. However, this creativity is constrained by the data it has been trained on and lacks the originality that comes from human creativity, which is often driven by personal experience, intuition, and a desire for expression.

Humans: Human creativity in communication is driven by a complex interplay of emotions, experiences, imagination, and intent. Humans can innovate in language, create new metaphors, and use language to express unique personal and cultural identities. Human creativity is often spontaneous and deeply tied to individual and collective experiences.

6. Emotional Engagement:

AI: AI can simulate emotional engagement by recognizing and responding to emotional cues in language, but it does not experience emotions. Its responses are based on patterns learned from data, without any true emotional understanding or empathy.

Humans: Human communication is inherently emotional. People express and respond to emotions in nuanced ways, using tone, body language, and context to convey feelings. Empathy, sympathy, and emotional intelligence play a crucial role in human communication, allowing for deep connections and understanding between individuals.

7. Contextual Sensitivity:

AI: AI's sensitivity to context is limited by its training data and algorithms. While it can take some context into account (like the previous messages in a conversation), it may struggle with complex or ambiguous situations, especially if they require a deep understanding of cultural, social, or personal nuances.

Humans: Humans are highly sensitive to context, using it to interpret meaning and guide their communication. They can understand subtext, read between the lines, and adjust their communication based on subtle cues like tone, body language, and shared history with the other person.

8. Ethical and Moral Considerations:

AI: AI lacks an inherent sense of ethics or morality. Its communication is governed by the data it has been trained on and the parameters set by its developers. Any ethical considerations in AI communication come from human-designed rules or guidelines, not from an intrinsic understanding of right or wrong.

Humans: Human communication is deeply influenced by ethical and moral considerations. People often weigh the potential impact of their words on others, considering issues like honesty, fairness, and respect. These considerations are shaped by individual values, cultural norms, and societal expectations.

The key differences between AI and human communication lie in the underlying mechanisms, the presence or absence of intent and understanding, and the role of emotions, creativity, and ethics. While AI can simulate certain aspects of human communication, it fundamentally operates in a different way, lacking the consciousness, experience, and meaning-making processes that characterize human interaction.

[vt-scribbles]

Something seriously lacking in my art is the ability to tell a story in a single illustration.

I've gotten so used to drawing my characters standing around doing random things that I've never practiced telling a full tale/putting implications into my pieces that require more thinking/looking.

It also comes from a lower amount of details in my works by default [since I like to get pieces done fast], but I'm tired of using that as an excuse.

[luneyverse]

not having an opinion on ai is actually fucking based of me. i will continue writing about the ethics and nuances of emerging technologies and inanimate objects gaining sentience if it’s the last thing i do

[starlene]

Also upset about the ugly-ass AI designed PotO they did in Bucharest that I only found out about when @frankwildhorn told me a week ago.

Just so you know, I guess.

[syrips]

people who dislike ai really need to hype up less-popular/unconventional artists and creators more. the amount of pet peeves i get from 'oh i love non-ai stuff' but the lack of support drives me so insane

you dont like ai art? how about you focus and show off that WIP, that messy creation, and that taboo art that you know is personal, intimate, and the work of someone who isnt ai, then?

how about you stop bashing ai's uncanny formula for 'perfection' and you praise people who post and share their creations, regardless of how professional or conventional it may not look?

for all the hundreds of thousands of notes on 'anti-ai' posts, it drives me insane at how little a 'cringey', unneat, immersive, intimate, 'obviously-created-by-a-beginner' type of creation gets.

like please, i know theyre kind of separate things, but can you at least prove you dislike ai by promoting non-ai stuff more? especially the beginner/intermediate/'obviously-human' ones?

[chewwytwee]

The real thing the conversation around AI needs is a reality check. AI isn't good at making things, and it absolutely can't make anything without massive human involvement. When digital music was first becoming a thing it was very scary for musicians because 'why would anyone want to hire someone to play music when they can just download a sample of it?!', and that was a very well founded fear that didn't end up being entirely false. Many people use exclusively digital sampling to make their music, and the field for live musicians has definitely shrank, but I think people are way too prone to idolize the glorious period of 'artistic purity' before digital production became a thing. Generative AI models are certainly scary, and it will definitely change the landscape for art online, but let's temper our expectations because honestly AI generated art is just in general pretty boring and uninteresting. Anyone can generate any prompt they could come up with, but art has a lot more to do with symbolism and narrative than it does with the literal images or tangible aspects of any piece of art.