#Empowering Marginalized Voices

[dgspeaks]

Navigating Pop Culture's Mosaic: Amplifying Diverse Voices

In the captivating realm of pop culture, DG Speaks embarks on a journey of cultural exploration, steering away from the mainstream to amplify diverse and often underrepresented voices. Our perspective is not merely to follow trends but to delve into the profound narratives that shape the cultural mosaic. Celebrating Diversity in Trends In the vast landscape of pop culture, trends often dominate…

[ivygorgon]

Support the Inclusive Democracy Act of 2023 (H.R.6643 / S. 3423)

An open letter to the U.S. Congress

576 so far! Help us get to 1,000 signers!

Despite his 34 felony convictions, Donald Trump has the wealth, connections, and privilege to ensure he doesn’t have to worry about his eligibility to vote this fall. But the millions of ordinary Americans currently disenfranchised by felony convictions aren’t so lucky. That's why, as your constituent, I urge you to co-sponsor and support the Inclusive Democracy Act of 2023 (H.R.6643 / S. 3423) to guarantee voting rights to ALL Americans. Right now, Jim Crow-style felony disenfranchisement laws deny voting rights to over 4.4 million Americans. The Inclusive Democracy Act of 2023 comprises a series of transformative measures that would end the broken system of felony disenfranchisement and empower marginalized communities: - Guaranteeing the right to vote in federal elections to all Americans who have criminal convictions. - Eliminating state-level barriers that prevent individuals with criminal convictions, whether they are incarcerated or have been released, from exercising their right to vote in federal elections. - Ensuring citizens in carceral settings have access to information about elections and candidates 29 Members of Congress have signed on as sponsors or co-sponsors of the Inclusive Democracy Act of 2023. If you haven’t already, please join your colleagues and add your name to that list. And if you’re already a co-sponsor – thank you, and please do everything you can to help pass this groundbreaking legislation into law.

▶ Created on October 14 by Jess Craven · 575 signers in the past 7 days

📱 Text SIGN PGODGR to 50409

🤯 Liked it? Text FOLLOW JESSCRAVEN101 to 50409

[selfvaluemagazine]

Self Value Magazine

[reasonsforhope]

"For the first time in almost 60 years, a state has formally overturned a so-called “right to work” law, clearing the way for workers to organize new union locals, collectively bargain, and make their voices heard at election time.

This week, Michigan finalized the process of eliminating a decade-old “right to work” law, which began with the shift in control of the state legislature from anti-union Republicans to pro-union Democrats following the 2022 election. “This moment has been decades in the making,” declared Michigan AFL-CIO President Ron Bieber. “By standing up and taking their power back, at the ballot box and in the workplace, workers have made it clear Michigan is and always will be the beating heart of the modern American labor movement.”

[Note: The article doesn't actually explain it, so anyway, "right to work" laws are powerful and deceptively named pieces of anti-union legislation. What right to work laws do is ban "union shops," or companies where every worker that benefits from a union is required to pay dues to the union. Right-to-work laws really undermine the leverage and especially the funding of unions, by letting non-union members receive most of the benefits of a union without helping sustain them. Sources: x, x, x, x]

In addition to formally scrapping the anti-labor law on Tuesday [February 13, 2024], Michigan also restored prevailing-wage protections for construction workers, expanded collective bargaining rights for public school employees, and restored organizing rights for graduate student research assistants at the state’s public colleges and universities. But even amid all of these wins for labor, it was the overturning of the “right to work” law that caught the attention of unions nationwide...

Now, the tide has begun to turn—beginning in a state with a rich labor history. And that’s got the attention of union activists and working-class people nationwide...

At a time when the labor movement is showing renewed vigor—and notching a string of high-profile victories, including last year’s successful strike by the United Auto Workers union against the Big Three carmakers, the historic UPS contract victory by the Teamsters, the SAG-AFTRA strike win in a struggle over abuses of AI technology in particular and the future of work in general, and the explosion of grassroots union organizing at workplaces across the country—the overturning of Michigan’s “right to work” law and the implementation of a sweeping pro-union agenda provides tangible evidence of how much has changed in recent years for workers and their unions...

By the mid-2010s, 27 states had “right to work” laws on the books.

But then, as a new generation of workers embraced “Fight for 15” organizing to raise wages, and campaigns to sign up workers at Starbucks and Amazon began to take off, the corporate-sponsored crusade to enact “right to work” measures stalled. New Hampshire’s legislature blocked a proposed “right to work” law in 2017 (and again in 2021), despite the fact that the measure was promoted by Republican Governor Chris Sununu. And in 2018, Missouri voters rejected a “right to work” referendum by a 67-33 margin.

Preventing anti-union legislation from being enacted and implemented is one thing, however. Actually overturning an existing law is something else altogether.

But that’s what happened in Michigan after 2022 voting saw the reelection of Governor Gretchen Whitmer, a labor ally, and—thanks to the overturning of gerrymandered legislative district maps that had favored the GOP—the election of Democratic majorities in the state House and state Senate. For the first time in four decades, the Democrats controlled all the major levers of power in Michigan, and they used them to implement a sweeping pro-labor agenda. That was a significant shift for Michigan, to be sure. But it was also an indication of what could be done in other states across the Great Lakes region, and nationwide.

“Michigan Democrats took full control of the state government for the first time in 40 years. They used that power to repeal the state’s ‘right to work’ law,” explained a delighted former US secretary of labor Robert Reich, who added, “This is why we have to show up for our state and local elections.”"

-via The Nation, February 16, 2024

[esraafamilys-2002]

Today, on International Women's Day, we celebrate the achievements of women worldwide and honor their roles in building communities and driving change. However,while we raise the banner of equality and empowerment❤️

we must also acknowledge the painful reality faced by many women in conflict zones, such as Gaza, where they endure exceptional challenges.

💔💔

In Gaza, many women continue to suffer from daily violations, whether through violence or marginalization, while the suffering of the Palestinian people escalates. The Palestinian woman is a symbol of resilience, yet even in her strength, she faces much humiliation and injustice.

We need global support to empower women everywhere, especially in regions affected by war and conflict. True progress cannot be made unless we pay attention to the suffering of women and stand with them in their fight for dignity and equality.🍉🇵🇸

Let us turn this day into an opportunity to reflect on the reality of women in places where their voices are not heard, and let’s all work towards creating a more just and free world for everyone.

Campaign verified by

@90-ghost

@gaza-evacuation-funds

[blackstarlineage]

Why Dr. John Henrik Clarke Is Correct About Black People Having No Friends (and why We Don’t Need Any) – a Garveyite Perspective

Dr. John Henrik Clarke famously stated, “Black people have no friends.” For many, this may sound harsh, but it is a sobering truth when viewed through the lens of Pan-Africanism and Marcus Garvey’s philosophy. Garvey understood that Black liberation can not depend on external allies; it must come from within—rooted in self-reliance, unity, and a shared commitment among Black people globally.

Here’s why, Dr. Clarke’s statement rings true and why, from a Garveyite perspective, Black people don’t need friends—only each other.

1. History Proves It

From colonialism to the civil rights era, supposed "friends" of Black people have repeatedly betrayed or abandoned us. Other groups have leveraged Black struggles for their own gains, only to leave Black people behind once their goals were achieved.

Post-slavery labour movements excluded Black workers.

Civil rights coalitions saw other groups gain rights, while Black people remained trapped under systemic racism.

Garvey and Clarke both saw these betrayals as evidence that Black people must prioritize their own interests and stop relying on others.

2. Global Anti-Blackness Is Real

Anti-Blackness isn’t confined to one region—it’s a global phenomenon. Across continents, Black people face systemic oppression, discrimination, and dehumanization.

Other groups often form alliances to protect their own power while marginalizing Black voices.

Even in spaces of shared oppression, anti-Blackness often takes precedence.

Dr. Clarke’s assertion and Garvey’s vision both point to this truth: Black liberation must come from within because no one else will prioritize us.

3. Dependency Leads to Exploitation

Depending on outside "friends" or "allies" often comes with hidden costs. Foreign aid, alliances, and solidarity movements often prioritize the interests of others over Black liberation.

Aid to African nations often perpetuates dependency rather than fostering self-sufficiency.

"Allies" in social justice movements often centre their struggles, leaving Black people to fight alone.

Garvey warned that dependency breeds vulnerability. Clarke reinforces this: Black people must build their own systems to avoid exploitation.

4. We Have Everything We Need

Garvey believed that Black people possess the resources, talents, and ingenuity needed for liberation.

Africa’s wealth: With its vast natural resources, Africa can fund global Black empowerment if reclaimed from exploitative systems.

Diaspora talent: Across the globe, Black communities excel in innovation, creativity, and resilience.

Dr. Clarke’s statement echoes Garvey’s vision: We don’t need friends because we already have all the tools for success.

5. Cultural Exploitation Is Proof of No True Friendship

Black culture—music, art, fashion, and more—is celebrated globally, but Black people are rarely compensated or empowered by their own creations.

Other groups profit from Black innovation while perpetuating anti-Black systems.

Cultural exploitation demonstrates a lack of true solidarity.

Garvey’s solution: Black people must reclaim their culture and use it as a tool for empowerment, not exploitation.

6. Unity Is Our Greatest Strength (and Threat to Oppressors)

A united global Black community is the most powerful weapon against systemic oppression. Garvey emphasized unity, and Clarke’s assertion underscores why others fear it:

A unified Black world challenges global power structures that thrive on division.

By focusing on internal unity, Black people strengthen themselves and disrupt oppressive systems.

7. Allies Often Divide Us

Alliances can create divisions within Black movements, as external influences pit factions against each other or dilute the focus on Black liberation.

During the civil rights movement, alliances often marginalized more radical Black voices.

Today, funding from external groups can cause conflicts between grassroots Black organizers and larger organizations tied to outside agendas.

Garvey’s emphasis on self-reliance offers a solution: Black unity must come first, free from outside interference.

8. Other Groups Prioritize Their Own Interests

Every group prioritizes its own survival and progress—it’s not wrong, but Black people must learn from this.

White nations maintain global alliances to uphold their dominance.

Asian nations focus on economic self-sufficiency.

Jewish communities have built strong networks to protect and uplift their people.

Garvey and Clarke would agree: It’s time for Black people to do the same and put themselves first.

9. Historical Success Through Self-Reliance

History proves that Black people thrive when they rely on themselves:

The Haitian Revolution succeeded because enslaved Africans united and rejected external dependence.

Garvey’s UNIA (Universal Negro Improvement Association) built businesses, schools, and a global movement without outside help.

These examples show that self-reliance works. Black people don’t need friends—they need focus.

10. True Liberation Is Self-Determined

Liberation can not be outsourced, gifted, or borrowed—it must be self-determined. Allies may help temporarily, but no one will prioritize Black liberation over their own interests.

Garvey envisioned a world where Black people controlled their own economies, politics, and resources.

Clarke’s assertion reminds us that we can’t afford to waste time seeking validation or support from others.

11. Black Liberation Threatens Global Power Structures

Both Garvey and Clarke understood that Black liberation isn’t just a struggle for freedom—it’s a direct threat to the systems of power that dominate the world.

A free and united Africa would undermine Western economic dominance, which relies on exploiting African resources.

A globally empowered Black diaspora would disrupt industries, politics, and systems built on anti-Blackness.

This explains why no other group can truly be a friend to Black liberation. Their survival often depends on maintaining the status quo that oppresses us.

12. “Allies” Often Centre Themselves in Our Struggles

Even when other groups claim to stand in solidarity with Black movements, their involvement often centers their own experiences, narratives, and priorities.

Non-black allies frequently shift attention to their struggles, leaving Black people to carry the burden of fighting for everyone else.

Movements like Black Lives Matter have seen external groups co-opt their messages for personal or political gain.

Garvey’s philosophy reminds us to stay focused on our own goals and not allow our movements to be hijacked.

13. Romanticizing External Help Distracts from Pan-African Solutions

One of the pitfalls of seeking allies is the belief that external help is necessary or even superior. This mindset can prevent Black people from exploring Pan-African solutions.

Garvey’s vision of “Africa for Africans” called for African nations and the diaspora to work together without relying on foreign nations or systems.

Clarke’s statement reinforces this idea: the best solutions come from within. Black people don’t need external friends—they need internal unity.

14. Allies Often Maintain Anti-Black Systems

Even so-called “progressive” allies often uphold the same systems that oppress Black people.

Corporations claiming to support racial justice continue to exploit African resources and labour.

Governments speaking out against racism still engage in policies that harm Black communities worldwide.

Dr. Clarke and Garvey both understood this hypocrisy. Real liberation requires rejecting systems that perpetuate oppression, even if they claim to support us.

15. Our Focus Should Be on Building Future Generations, Not Pleasing Others

Garvey often emphasized the importance of preparing future generations to lead and succeed independently.

Clarke’s warning about having no friends reinforces this: Why waste time seeking allies when we could be building schools, economies, and systems that empower our children?

A Garveyite perspective prioritizes creating a legacy of self-reliance and leadership that ensures the survival and progress of Black people globally.

By focusing on the future, Black people can stop relying on the approval or assistance of others and instead secure their own destinies.

Final Reflection: All We Have Is Us, and That’s Enough

Dr. John Henrik Clarke’s statement and Marcus Garvey’s philosophy both lead to the same conclusion: Black people must take responsibility for their liberation. True freedom can not and will not come from allies—it must come from within. The power lies in our hands, in our unity, and in our shared commitment to self-determination.

We don’t need friends. We need ourselves.

[letters-to-lgbt-kids]

My dear lgbt+ kids, 

If you name your five favorite songs and not a single one of them is by a queer artist … well, then maybe your five favorite songs just don’t happen to be by queer artists. 

Don’t get me wrong, it’s amazing to support queer artists! For all these grand ideas of uplifting marginalized voices, supporting your community, telling the industry that there’s a demand for representation, all those things - but also in a much more direct and personal way: it can feel really empowering and meaningful and comforting to see a piece of yourself in the music you listen to. It can also broaden your horizons and help you see things from a different perspective (since no two queer people are exactly alike and they may sing about experiences you didn’t have). And even more directly, listening to queer music is cool because there’s simply so many cool songs by so many cool artists in so many different genres! 

But with all that being said: The number of queer artists in your top list does in no way measure how good of a person you are. 

Anyone who tells you otherwise is lying. There’s no set number of how many queer artists you “need” to support. There’s also no specific list of artists or songs every queer person needs to be a fan of. 

Listening to music should be an enjoyable experience and not some performative competition. Listen to queer artists because you enjoy their songs - not because you feel (internal or external) pressure to prove that you do. 

With all my love, 

Your Tumblr Dad 

[sleepynegress]

THIS ISN'T COMMON KNOWLEDGE BUT SHOULD BE...ABOUT MEDICAID....

If you ever find yourself in the position of living in the home of a parent who is disabled and requires full-time care and you are their primary caregiver for at least 2 years, and they intend to leave their assets to you after they pass, make sure to transfer ownership of their assets, home/land in your name ASAP...or they will require you to pay back any benefits received and claim those assets even out from under you, as soon as your loved one passes. This is yet another way that generational assets /wealth are easily taken out of marginalized communities. It is a loan.

And the sharks circle as soon as your loved one passes. Here's an article about it:

Decided to add context. I don't like to talk about it here, because ehh, social media is for my vapid entertainment thoughts for me. It's a hobby/getaway/ place to get semi-social with strangers and online friends with shared interests, but I don't want anyone else to go through what I am... Of course, this applies specifically to the U.S.'s broken healthcare system. So, for those who don't know, my mom passed recently. I am an only child with no siblings or children. My whole life during that time was 24/7 care. She had insurance, but it wasn't enough to cover everything that she needed, so Medicaid was the obvious solution, right? The government takes care of our disabled elderly who have worked until retirement, right? It seemed like the routine thing to do, I had never heard anything during the process about having to pay it back,but sure enough, less than 12 weeks after her passing, I was hit with a warning (which I followed up on and was told I would NOT be charged because of my caregiver status) and then 2 weeks later the "bill". The lady I spoke to, totally changed her attitude from the first time I spoke to her to the point where I felt scammed. Out came a patronizing voice certain people use with children, that measured whiny thing (it's always a red-flag to me and makes me instantly dislike you if you do this even with kids, btw... speak to kids like PEOPLE). I feel like an idiot. I have been doing this for over a decade and didn't think to transfer any assets of hers during that time because it *was* hers. I wanted her to feel as empowered about that as possible.

Not a single soul said I should transfer those assets to keep this from happening and now I'm facing down what feels like some kind of weird conspiracy to take the land and house.

FYI, there have been weird inquiries, the census came to mark down my mother's death literally *immediately* after she passed...and odd timing called the day of the notice to "help", with all the southern Christian signifiers (bless your heart we'll be praying for you).... It feels so seedy. Anyway, all this to say if you find yourself in a similar position....

TRANSFER THOSE ASSETS INTO YOUR NAME 2 years into caregiving or they will take them from you, house etc..

[a-queer-seminarian]

A fitting Lenten read: The Darkness Divine by the Unitarian Universalist Rev. Dr. Kristen L. Harper.

ID: book pages titled "A Theology of Darkness," beginning with a poem titled "The Darkness Divine" [breaks added for readability] and continue into prose paragraphs:

" God resides in depths of darkness as in the light of sunbeams. The moon shines brighter surrounded by night and life is secure in the black waters of the womb.

As the night sky littered with stars demonstrates again and again, there is beauty in darkness and beauty in light— one no more brilliant then the other, one no more necessary than the other, one always complementing the other.

Without the heated darkness of the Universe, splitting neutrons, electrons, and protons from atoms, life and light would never be.

The task for us today is to recognize God in both — To see the divine in the rich brown earth, the textured black walnut, as well as the white snow and the pale pink jellyfish. To see the sacred in the panther and the swan. To embrace the dignity of the Black Madonna, as it is embodied in the Virgin Mary.

The task for us today is to look into the multifaceted colors of the onyx and see the miraculous spectrum of color produced in the prism of a diamond.

To begin the dismantling of our racist language, we first need a new theology of darkness—a new way to relate to the darkness, blackness, and brownness that surrounds us, and to the people whose skin is often reflected in our disempowering language. Poetry can help us cultivate a different relationship with and to blackness and darkness. In the darkness exists a time for rest, a time of regeneration and healing, a time of safety and nourishment, and a time of letting go to relax in God's embrace.

As a spiritual humanist, I believe that which we call God — the energetic force of love and creation — is within us and around us, connecting and empowering us as we move toward one another and through the world. While there are many definitions of theology, I lead with a theology rooted in relationship with one another, the earth, God, the spirit of life, all that is holy, and the higher good that can occur when we recognize and affirm our interdependence. This relationship, both conscious and unconscious, impacts how we operate in the world, how we view and treat others, and how we respond to injustices in which we play a part. "

Last image shows the back cover of the book, which has a blurb and then a pic of the author, a Black woman with dark hair and glasses smiling at the viewer, next to an about the author section:

" Too often in U.S. culture-and notably in faith communities— a culture of white supremacy is reinforced in damaging but unexamined ways.

In The Darkness Divine, minister and poet Kristen L. Harper confronts and unpacks the language, imagery, buzzwords, and cultural touchstones that demean and dehumanize Black people but are so commonplace they can easily escape notice.

More importantly, in a brilliant arrangement of essays and poems in the vein of Claudia Rankine, Harper lifts up the strength, beauty, and resilience of Black people and outlines a path forward. She invites readers to explore what they have learned and assimilated so they might de-center whiteness and stretch their understanding and imagination to radically transform perceptions of blackness.

While directed at her own Unitarian Universalist tradition, The Darkness Divine is a powerful and loving challenge to all those committed to the work of dismantling white supremacy.

Rev. Dr. Kristen L. Harper is the minister of the Unitarian Church of Barnstable, Massachusetts, where she has served for 18 years. Rev. Harper previously served in Ormond Beach, Florida. She received her D.Min from Meadville Lombard Theological School in 1999, and was only the second Black woman to be called to a Unitarian Universalist Congregation as sole minister. She has contributed to Voices from the Margins: An Anthology of Meditations and Centering: Navigating Race, Authenticity, and Power in Ministry. "

[americanssweetheart]

First Ladies Lasting Impact

One of the president's most significant assets is their First Lady. Although the president's job is the hardest in the world, First Ladies are influential and can help boost the president's success rate. Here are the three most inspirational first ladies and their accomplishments.

Eleanor Roosevelt was amongst U.S. history's most transformative and pioneering First Ladies. As an advocate of civil rights, women's rights, and poverty alleviation, Eleanor used her platform to fight for the marginalized, reshaping the public expectation of what a First Lady could achieve. Since she had made significant changes, Eleanor set the stage for every First Lady after her.

She was married to President Franklin D. Roosevelt and was constantly present in his administration. She took on an apparent and impactful role during his presidency, especially during the Great Depression and World War II. Eleanor was a delegate to the United Nations, where she chaired the UN's Human Rights Commission and even helped draft the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948. This landmark document continues to shape global human rights policy today.

Eleanor was determined to be an advocate for racial equality. She constantly spoke out against segregation, met with African American leaders, and supported rights for minorities. She was one of the first public figures to invite African American leaders into the White House and was deeply committed to promoting civil rights for everyone.

Eleanor Roosevelt's influential actions exceeded well beyond her time as First Lady. She became a symbol of courage, compassion, and activism, and her legacy as a trailblazer for social justice remains distinctive.

When discussing any first lady, it's crucial to mention the most iconic First Lady, Jacqueline Kennedy. Jackie's intelligence, elegance, and grace were essential for former President Kennedy's success. She made a name for herself and had a fantastic marketing mindset. 

Jacqueline Kennedy is known for her influential fashion taste of her time and for renovating the White House. However, many people don't acknowledge how she established relationships with diplomats worldwide. Jackie used her role as the First Lady to glorify art and culture since she believed it was a part of the American identity. She invited world-class artists, musicians, and performers to the White House, which constructed cultural events that would influence future generations.

After the president's tragic assassination in 1963, Jackie handled the loss of her husband with grace. She helped organize his funeral, which played a significant role in helping shape the American collaborative memory of her husband's presidency. She preserved his legacy through her dedication to ensuring that his vision and accomplishments were remembered and cherished.

Jackie Kennedy remains one of the most loved and iconic historical figures, not just because of her elegance and grace but for her profound assistance to American culture, history, and diplomacy.

Known for her authenticity, intelligence, and compassion, Michelle Obama used her role as First Lady to elevate public health, education, and empowerment, specifically for young individuals and girls. As the first African American First Lady, Michelle brought a unique perspective to the White House and worked on initiatives to empower young people, particularly girls, and promote healthier lifestyles across America while breaking racial boundaries. Her legacy as a trailblazer for racial equality and her commitment to supporting military families made her one of American history's most influential and inspiring First Ladies.

Michelle became a powerful voice as an advocate for healthier lifestyles through the "Let's Move!" campaign Michelle founded and the "Let Girls Learn" campaign that fought for educational equity. This movement aimed to combat childhood obesity by promoting healthy eating, physical activity, and better access to nutritious food. The program increased awareness of the importance of fitness and nutrition for children and families nationwide.

Michelle worked closely with military families by advocating for better resources, care, and support for the people serving in the armed forces and their families. She founded the "Joining Forces initiative," a campaign to support veterans and military families with employment, health care, and education resources.

Michelle became a beacon of strength and inspiration as an African American woman in the White House. She used her position to address issues of racial inequality and foster conversations on race, identity, and cultural awareness in America. Her memoir, Becoming, offers an intimate account of her life and experiences, resonating with millions worldwide.

Michelle Obama's tenure as First Lady was marked by her authenticity, leadership, and dedication to positively impacting American society, particularly in public health and education. Her continued work, primarily through her foundation, inspires a new generation of leaders, particularly young women of color.

Analyzing these inspirational women's work shows us that these First Ladies used their unusual positions to endorse change through human rights, cultural enrichment, or public health. Their leadership, empathy, and devotion continue to inspire different generations, proving that even in roles that may seem secondary, individuals can create a monumental impact. Their legacies remind us that with solidity and a clear vision, we all have the potential to drive positive change and shape a better future for others.

[colorisbyshe]

Why do you keep saying the "but both sides are the same, right?" Sarcastic bit. Are you trying to say people should have voted for harris??

Yeah, I am.

I am saying that people shouldn't have conceded all electoral politics to the far right. I am saying that electoral politics dictates our entire lives and remaining silent on the subject does even less than voting. I am saying I acknowledge the parties aren't different enough, that both parties are evil, and that... the difference in evilness... matters.

Mutual aid, organizing, donating, educational posting cannot replace $43 BILLION in aid to populations facing famine, disease, and other crises. In fact, all of those things are HARDER to do under this presidency than they would've been under Kamala.

I think saying this absolutely destroys my personal integrity and it does go against my own ideology--I shouldn't be vouching for the lesser evil. It's wrong.

And yet millions and MILLIONS of lived relied on my lack of integrity to not suffer, to not die, to not get infected or starve. I will be the worse person if it means more people get to live--to live better lives or just live, period.

Electoral politics happen with or without us. Taking the most far left voices out of the ring or throwing them at scam artists like Jill Stein does not help people. It does not legitimize or empower our perspective.

People need to be voting in every primary, every federal election, every state election, every local election, every single fucfking special election, every referendum.

Because those are the people, those are the laws and policies our work on the ground exists in reaction to. The path of least resistance means more people fed, more people housed, more people alive.

"But X choice is still bad." And the difference between and worse is hundreds, thousands, millions of people getting an education or vaccinated.

REmember when people stalled boats shipping weapons to Israel? it didn't change much but it gave people in Palestine even just one more day--to evacuate, to move to safer ground, to make more clothing. The stalled boats didn't FIX the problem, didn't solve 100% or even 5% of the issue, but it gave peopel time and space to figure out survival.

You need to view electoral politics with the same, grim practicality. Your local, state, federal choices are your guard rails or your executioner. Don't like your options? Turn to primaries, turn to smaller levels of government who ar gaining experience for bigger government, turn local to form survival groups.

Or run yourself. Sell your soul, destroy your integrity, and then do what you can to improve or save handful of lives. Go on a school board. Attend a local town council meeting and object to resources being moved away from affordable housing.

There is a reason why gerrymanderig exists, why things are so fucking rigged, and it's because voting actually does matter and these rigged forms ALWAYS exist to silence the marginalized, those on the left, those who advocate for the marginalized. Why the fuck are you doin gtheir work for them by sitting it out voluntarily?

Genuinely, fuck Kamala. Fuck every democrat. But they move to the right when the right wins. There is no opposition party anymore.

You do need to actually keep them from moving to the right. You do actually need to primary out the dems who aren't doing shit.

Or vote local and actually help out third parties in the few places they can actually win (local, MAYBE state) so they can work towards legitimacy.

I don't like saying this. I don't like throwing my integrity out the door.

But it does... or did mean the difference between life and death for people more vulnerable for myself. And that mattered.

OBJECTIVE REALITY is democrats are better for more people. More people live, more people live better lives under democrats. Why wouldn't I endorse that?

What is the alternative? Provide me with an alternative that actually works. "Oh, I don't owe you that!" Okay, well someone is owed teh billions of dollars of USAID that just got put out of commission (at least for now).

"Oh, that'll be challenged and stopped!" By who? Oh, is it elected officials? Or people appointed by elected officials? Are those the guard rails?

Are the people who respond to the protests, to the strikes, to the rare Luigis... elected officials?

Yeah, they are. Why wouldn't I want the people responding to be even marginally better?

Ideologically, waht I am saying is heinous. I'm not blind to that.

I don't care about ideology when it gets halted by... literal reality. Reality is we had two choices. One choice was worse in literally every single way (yes EVERY SINGLE WAY and if you think anything is better right now yo uare not thinking long term). Why would I want everyone's lives to be made worse just to feel like I still had dignity? Fuck my dignity.

This isn't complicated. There is a reason why the bulk of activists and scholars and people on the ground still endorsed Kamala, even knowing they'd likely be betrayed.

It's simple big picture shit.

[paganpulse]

May 2025 Astrology & Pagan News: Grounding, Awakening & Sacred Resistance

As we move into May, the cosmos invites us to slow down, root deeply, and reflect. The fires of April’s eclipse season and planetary upheaval left many scorched—spiritually, emotionally, and politically. Now, May brings healing, reflection, and restoration, but not without moments of awakening and challenge.

With major alignments in Taurus and Gemini, this month encourages both grounding in what is real and questioning the information we consume. It's a time to tend to our inner gardens while keeping our eyes open to manipulation, censorship, and growing unrest.

Astrological Highlights: May 2025

May 7 – New Moon in Taurus (Planting Seeds of Stability)

This earthy new moon brings a powerful opportunity to set long-term intentions around home, money, nourishment, and emotional safety. Taurus, ruled by Venus, asks us to seek comfort without complacency. After April’s chaos, this lunation is a balm—but also a reminder that true security comes from within, not systems built on exploitation.

Magic for This Moon:

Money & abundance spells (focus on sustainability, not excess)

Kitchen witchery & herbal blessings

Grounding rituals with stones like moss agate, jade, or smoky quartz

May 15 – Mercury Enters Gemini (Watch the Words)

Mercury, the planet of communication, returns to its home sign of Gemini. Expect fast-moving news, intense conversations, and digital energy surges. However, with increased surveillance and AI regulation debates growing louder, witches and spiritual creators may feel the squeeze of censorship.

This is a good time to reclaim your narrative, strengthen digital wards, and be mindful of how language can be used to either empower or confuse.

May 23 – Full Moon in Sagittarius (Truth, Liberation & Sacred Rebellion)

This full moon lights up themes of truth, justice, spiritual freedom, and exploration. Sagittarius energy stokes our hunger for wisdom, higher meaning, and unfiltered truth. Use this moon to burn away lies—personal, political, or societal—and renew your commitment to authentic living.

Magic for This Moon:

Rituals for justice and ethical clarity

Divination for guidance on spiritual path or activism

Bonfire spellwork for burning away deceit

Collective Energies & Pagan Community Insights

The Illusion Cracks Further

Globally, more people are recognizing the cracks in the American façade of “freedom and prosperity.” After last month's eclipse and tech crackdown, the narrative of the U.S. as the world’s moral leader is being openly questioned. Many Americans are facing unbearable housing costs, limited reproductive rights, and a political landscape that feels increasingly authoritarian.

Meanwhile, international protests continue to rise in solidarity with Americans, especially those most impacted: women, queer people, immigrants, witches, and marginalized communities.

Pagan & Witch Communities Rising

This month, many witches are choosing resistance as a form of devotion. Whether through spellwork, community education, or mutual aid, magic is being used to:

Protect reproductive rights

Fight corporate overreach

Dismantle white supremacist ideology

Themes emerging in our circles:

Decolonizing spirituality and returning to ancestral practices

Digital shielding magic to protect voices online

Land-focused offerings to support Earth during Taurus season

What We Can Do in May:

Anchor into spiritual practice—rituals, journaling, shadow work

Support grassroots movements and small creators

Reclaim our relationship with the Earth through food, land, and sustainable magic

Gather in sacred space: host Beltane-after circles or full moon gatherings to connect in-person or online

Important Pagan Dates This Month

May 1 – Beltane Observances Continue: Even if you missed the start, the Beltane season carries through early May. Light candles, dance, or create flower offerings.

May 13 – Hekate's Deipnon (Dark Moon Offering): A powerful time for banishing, protection, and honoring spirits at the crossroads.

May 30 – New Month Blessing Work: A growing trend among modern pagans is blessing the transition into each new month. This is a beautiful way to renew intention and refresh your altar space.

Closing Energy: Reclaim, Reconnect, Resist

May is about rebuilding sacred ground. The magic we plant now may take time to grow, but it will root deeply if done with intention and courage. While the world shakes, our roots hold us—in Earth, in each other, in truth.

You are not powerless. You are sacred. You are needed.

Blessed May.

[fakerobotrealblog]

In the dynamic tapestry of influential women, Malala Yousafzai and Taylor Swift emerge as beacons of inspiration, each weaving a unique narrative of triumph over challenges. Malala's unwavering commitment to education rights, forged through a harrowing encounter with the Taliban, contrasts with Taylor Swift's musical prowess and resilience against the scrutinizing lens of fame. As we delve into their achievements, struggles, and the echoes of their empowering quotes, the question arises: Who stands as the superior role model in this diverse spectrum of impactful women? Join us in unraveling the intricate threads of their journeys and discover the powerful lessons embedded in the narratives of Malala Yousafzai and Taylor Swift.

**Malala Yousafzai:**

1. **Achievements:**

- Malala Yousafzai is a Nobel laureate and education activist who stood up for girls' education rights in Pakistan, especially in the face of the Taliban's oppressive regime.

- Her advocacy work led to the co-founding of the Malala Fund, a non-profit organization focused on promoting education for girls globally.

2. **Struggles:**

- Malala faced severe adversity when she was shot by the Taliban at the age of 15 for advocating girls' education. Her remarkable recovery and continued commitment to her cause exemplify her resilience.

- She endured ongoing threats and challenges but remained steadfast in her dedication to promoting education for girls.

3. **Quotes:**

- "We realize the importance of our voices only when we are silenced."

- "One child, one teacher, one book, one pen can change the world."

**Taylor Swift:**

1. **Achievements:**

- Taylor Swift is a highly successful and influential singer-songwriter with numerous awards, including 11 Grammy Awards and an Emmy.

- Swift has been an advocate for artists' rights, influencing changes in the music industry, such as her role in prompting Apple Music to change its policy on compensating artists during its free trial period.

2. **Struggles:**

- Swift has faced challenges in the public eye, including media scrutiny of her relationships and public disputes with other celebrities. She has transformed these challenges into opportunities for artistic expression.

- Swift has been an advocate against online harassment, revealing struggles she faced with body image and self-esteem, emphasizing the importance of mental health.

3. **Quotes:**

- "I think there is a lesson in knowing that you can live your life in a way that you’re proud of and people are still gonna take shots."

- "You are not the opinion of someone who doesn't know you."

**Comparison:**

1. **Achievements:**

- Malala's achievements are deeply rooted in activism and global advocacy for education rights, impacting the lives of marginalized girls globally.

- Taylor Swift's achievements lie in the realm of entertainment and industry influence, using her platform to address issues such as artists' rights.

2. **Struggles:**

- Malala faced life-threatening adversity for her activism, highlighting the gravity of her mission.

- Taylor Swift's struggles are often in the public eye, with media scrutiny and controversies, which she navigates with resilience.

3. **Role Model:**

- Malala is a powerful role model for her unwavering commitment to education and her courage in the face of adversity.

- Taylor Swift serves as a role model in the entertainment industry, demonstrating resilience and using her platform for positive change.

In conclusion, both Malala Yousafzai and Taylor Swift are influential figures who have overcome challenges in different realms. Malala stands out as a global education activist with unparalleled courage, while Taylor Swift serves as a role model in the entertainment industry, using her platform for positive change. The choice of a "better" role model depends on individual values and the impact one seeks in the realms of education activism or entertainment.

[cosmic-walkers]

i don't talk about this a lot, like at all. i think it's important vote blue, no matter who, but also don't speak over marginalized people who voice their discomfort in voting/the candidates/the American political system, especially Palestinians, suandis, haitains, arabs, Muslims, etc. just do your part. go to the polls, educate your families, educate your communities, canvas. but dog-piling people online who are seeing their family blown to bits overseas, or seeing the us fund genocides and wars, isn't going to do anything. and it's sure as fuck not going to make them want to vote.

i think voting is important. and as someone who is black, queer and lives in the south (texas) we have been feeling the negative impacts of the current state of the government for years. I'm going to vote, because i don't want project 2025 to be a thing, I'm actually terrified. and I'm going to empower those around me to vote. I'm going to educate my community, friends, and family on project 2025 and make sure that everyone gets out and votes. but I'm not going to spend my time arguing with victims of genocide online and act like that's going to do shit. because it's not. i implore you to stop with the online activism, and just make sure your family and friends get to the polls.

[brunettedelulu]

Feminism and Pop Culture: A Complex Interplay.

In the contemporary socio-cultural landscape, the interplay between feminism and pop culture is both intricate and profound. Pop culture, encompassing various media forms like film, television, music, and literature, serves as a powerful vehicle for disseminating and challenging societal norms. Feminism, as a movement advocating for gender equality and the dismantling of patriarchal structures, finds a fertile yet contentious ground within this sphere.

The Evolution of Feminist Representation :

Historically, pop culture has been a double-edged sword for feminism. On one hand, it has perpetuated stereotypes and reinforced traditional gender roles. The early decades of cinema and television, for instance, often depicted women as passive, subservient, or overly sexualized. Such portrayals not only mirrored societal biases but also contributed to their perpetuation.

However, the feminist movement's waves have progressively infiltrated pop culture, demanding more nuanced and empowered representations of women. The 1970s and 1980s saw the emergence of strong female characters who defied conventional norms, such as Ellen Ripley in Alien and Sarah Connor in Terminator. These characters marked a shift, albeit a gradual one, towards a more complex portrayal of women in media.

Pop Culture as a Platform for Feminist Discourse :

In recent years, pop culture has become an increasingly significant platform for feminist discourse. The rise of social media has democratized content creation and dissemination, allowing feminist voices to challenge mainstream narratives more effectively. Movements like #MeToo have leveraged pop culture to bring issues of sexual harassment and gender inequality to the forefront of public consciousness.

Television series such as The Handmaid’s Tale and films like Wonder Woman and Captain Marvel reflect and amplify feminist ideals, resonating with audiences globally. These narratives not only provide entertainment but also serve as catalysts for discussions on gender politics, power dynamics, and societal change.

The Commercialization of Feminism :

However, the relationship between feminism and pop culture is not without its complexities and contradictions. One significant issue is the commercialization of feminism. Brands and media companies often co-opt feminist rhetoric for profit, diluting its radical essence in the process. This phenomenon, sometimes referred to as "commodity feminism," risks transforming a movement aimed at systemic change into a marketable trend devoid of its original political potency. The feminist slogan t-shirts, empowerment-themed advertisements, and "girl boss" narratives proliferating in pop culture can, at times, reduce feminism to a mere aesthetic or consumer choice, rather than a sustained commitment to gender justice. This superficial engagement with feminist ideals highlights the tension between authentic representation and commercial exploitation.

Intersectionality in Pop Culture :

A crucial aspect of modern feminist thought is intersectionality, a concept introduced by Kimberlé Crenshaw. Intersectionality posits that various forms of oppression, such as racism, sexism, and classism, are interconnected and cannot be examined in isolation. Pop culture's engagement with intersectionality has been mixed, with some progress and notable gaps.

For instance, while there have been strides in representing diverse female experiences, much work remains to be done. The success of films like Black Panther and shows like Pose demonstrates a growing recognition of the importance of inclusive storytelling. Yet, the underrepresentation and misrepresentation of marginalized groups, including women of color, LGBTQ+ individuals, and those with disabilities, persist as critical issues.

Conclusion :

The intersection of feminism and pop culture is a dynamic and evolving terrain. Pop culture holds the potential to both challenge and reinforce societal norms, making it a vital arena for feminist engagement. As consumers and creators, it is imperative to critically examine the media we engage with, advocate for more authentic and inclusive representations, and resist the commodification of feminist ideals. By fostering a more nuanced understanding of gender and intersectionality within pop culture, we can contribute to a more equitable and just society. The journey towards this goal is ongoing, requiring vigilance, creativity, and a commitment to transformative change.

[himikochan]

Conclave Round 4 Masterpost

Reminder, if you vote for my candidate, I WILL send you a cat picture: for this round, I will also kiss the kitty!! Her name is Miss Pumpernickel and she LOVES kisses!

4-1: Baggio v Soo-Jung: Either are acceptable choices!

4-2: Mẫn v Mangkhanekhoun: Mangkhanekhoun made reforms to the Laotian seminary studies so that seminarians had to learn more about their communities and provide aid. Imo, this continues the legacy Francis had prioritizing pastoral relationships between the church and believers.

4-3: Sanchez v Imeri: Imeri is my pick! In Guatemala, "[Imeri] has been involved in social justice issues, especially in the area of protecting the rights of indigenous people. He has fought against multinational corporations who come to Guatemala for its mineral wealth while destroying the countryside. [Imeri] has empowered the poor and marginalized and fostered civil courage to fight against the injustice they experience."

4-4: Tagle v Pizzaballa: So in addition to the things I've already said about Tagle, in a 2021 interview he talked about his attitudes towards the synodal process, "There is a walking that St. Joseph shows us. He walked dangerous paths with Mary and Jesus, guided by the direction of the angel of God. It is a walking that means protection, that means caring. We hope that during the synodal process, we may develop this capacity to love Jesus, to love the Church. And even if we have some observations that are not always positive, we must do so out of caring, out of loving, so that the name of Jesus will be proclaimed and preserved." I really appreciate a candidate that talks both of the church as a practical living institution but also connecting to the fundamental human stories contained within the gospel.

4-5: Rodrigues v Coccopalmerio: Coccopalmerio is the more acceptable option! In addition to sympathies towards homosexuals and those living in "irregular marital situations," he also believes in reforming the Curia!

The Vatican's former top advisor on canon law has made a public call to insert legal obligations for the care of creation into the Church's universal canon law - making it a legal duty for Catholics not only "not to harm" the environment, but to improve it.

4-6: Sau-yan v Nhơn: Sau-yan is my pick for his connection to Chicago and his interest in broader church communication!

“The important thing is to have more diverse voices, like you have the cardinal, from Mongolia, even though he's Italian, but he speaks for the Mongolian Church. I think the Church is getting richer with different voices.”

4-7: Heung-Sik v Zuppi: Zuppi is an easy pick! He has spoken vociferously against European nationalism, is amenable to priests being married! Zuppi is also for the adoption of "a new pastoral attitude that we must seek together with our L.G.B.T. brothers and sisters" to "help L.G.B.T. Catholics feel more at home in what is, after all, their church."

Zuppi has said, "St. Francis – in a world that was and is fraught with wolves and violent or fearful citizens, by towers and swords, by knights and brigands, by wars and enmity, polluted by so much hatred as to make it impossible to speak of peace – lays out a plan for a fraternal, unarmed world where there is room for everyone, beginning with the poorest and most fragile.”

4-8: Esquivel v Mendonça v Pengo: Mendonça is a strong theologian with an excellent academic career, took an additional vocation with the Franciscans because he admired them so much, and is widely considered papabile in this conclave!

In his preface to the [Sister Maria Teresa Forcades i Vila]’s 2013 book Feminist Theology in History, Mendonça said: "One of the convictions with which this book leaves us is that the future of Christianity greatly depends on the process of ‘clearing out’ of its past and present that we will be able to accomplish. [...] Teresa Forcades I Vila reminds us of the essential thing: that Jesus of Nazareth did not codify laws or lay down rules. Jesus simply lived. That is, he constructed an ethic of relationship; he embodied the poetry of his message in the visibility of his flesh; he displayed his own body as a premise.