#Paints Labelling

[interpacktechnologiesllp]

Interpack Technologies LLP

Interpack Technologies LLP, a reputable Mumbai-based manufacturer, has earned a distinguished reputation for delivering top-quality sticker labeling machines and Sleeve applicators for over five years across various industries.

Our comprehensive range of labeling machines includes wrap-around, front and back, semi-automatic, and combi labeling machines. Also we deal in Sleeve applicators which include body sleeving and neck sleeving machines. These machines are ideal for the pharmaceutical, food and beverage, and cosmetic industries.

Our skilled designers and engineers help you to produce cutting-edge labeling solutions for leading brands. If you're searching for a professional sticker labeling manufacturer, contact us.

Phone Number: +918055411199

Business Email: info@interpacktechnologies.com

Website: https://www.interpacktechnologies.com

LinkedIn Link: https://in.linkedin.com/company/interpack-technologies

Working Hours: Mon - Sun - 09:00 AM - 06:00 PM

Address: Interpack Technologies LLP Gala No. 10A, Madhu Vrinda Industrial estate, phase 3 Dhuri Industrial complex No. 1, Waliv Phata Village, Waliv, Vasai East 401208 Maharashtra, India

[save-mohamed-family]

In a moment that can never be erased from my memory, imagine how many lives were taken in this house in less than a minute. In a place like this, and in a similar incident, my father, mother, and siblings were killed. It happened in a single moment, but it left a wound deep inside me that will never heal.

From the intensity of the shelling, the sound of gunfire, and the explosions of bombs, the night turns into a bleak day. I took these pictures so you could feel, even just a little, what I am going through and suffering every day.

Don't my children deserve to live in peace? Why are they deprived of the most basic rights of life, even the simple act of sleeping safely has become a distant dream?

I have lost enough because of this war. Please help me with your donations and by sharing my story so that I can protect my children and my wife and get them out of Gaza before I lose them like I lost my father, mother, and siblings.

The Israeli army has issued a new evacuation order, and now evacuations are being enforced in additional areas. Once again, we must leave the place we are in, as if displacement has become our inevitable fate. Does anyone truly understand what we are going through? Imagine being forced to move from place to place every day, living in a constant state of uprooting, without stability, without safety. Each time, you leave a piece of yourself behind, as if losing something you can never reclaim, and the place that was once your home turns into yet another painful memory.

@90-ghost @soon-palestine @jezior0 @heba-20 @italofobia

@vakarian-shepard @tamarrud @space-is-the-place2 @bilal-salah0

@tamamita @kaapstadgirly @sillyfr3nchb1tch @vakarians-babe

@fairuzfakhira @pinkbeetroot @wlwaerith @ashwantsafreepalestine

@sayruq @humanvoreture @dimondlite @plomegranate @sar-soor

@fallahi @fairuzstuff @queerstudiesnatural @communistcheerleader @pollo-con-vodka @stuckinapril @1rakus @dried-deep-sea @2spirit-1spoon @radicalgraff @acehimbo

@palipunk @nabulsi @still-hoping-for-better-days @delicatedaisydreams @gothhabiba @heritageposts @thatdiabolicalfeminist @thottacelli @fading-event-608 @remindertoclick @no-thats-absurd @eldermoonbreezy @magnus-rhymes-with-swagness @websterml @socialjusticebard

@determinate-negation @discoverynews @ezrazone

[annlarimer]

Wooper slap. Acrylic paint and gel pen on USPS Label 228.

[johnnyshrine]

★ 083 // “Pizza Box”

[syn0vial]

sure is interesting watching the internet grapple with the fact that there are more political persuasions out there than "alt-right" and "far-leftist"

[arcade-confetti]

Ouppy

Didn't care for one of the extra heads this Red Hood figure came with so I turned it into a dog mask with the clay and paint I had! Also made a leather harness and collar for him

[dresshistorynerd]

I've seen a post you've reblogged and added to, among many things about women showing nipples. Can you recommend any ref material (articles, videos, etc.) are share your knowledge about this? Cause I'm curious about that, as nowadays going out in a shirt without a bra makes you indecent, while in like 90s it was okayish? I wonder how it was in previous centuries.

There is a really cool academic paper about bare breast dresses in 17th century England specifically. I think anyone can read it by creating a free account.

Abby Cox also has a good video about the cleavage during the past 500 years in which she goes through also the nip slip phenomena.

I don't have other sources that specifically focus on this subject, though many sources about specific decades touch on it, but I do have my primary source image collection, so I can sum up the history of the bare nipple.

So my findings from primary source images (I could be wrong and maybe I just haven't found earlier examples, since the paper above mentions briefly that there were bear-breast styles as early as 15th century) is that the Venetians were the first ones to show the nipple for courtly fashion. At the same time in other places in Europe they sported the early Elizabethan no-boob style that completely covered and flattened the chest. In the other corners of Italy the necklines were also low but less extreme. Venetian kirtle necklines dropped extremely low as early as 1560s and they combined extremely sheer, basically see-through partlets with their kirtle. First example below is a 1565-70 portrait of a Venetian lady with the nipples just barely covered waiting slip into view with a movement of arm. There was an even more extreme version of this with the kirtle being literally underboob style, still with a sheer doublet. Though I believe this was not quite for the respectable ladies, since I have only seen it depicted on high class courtesans. They were not exactly respectable ladies, but they did have quite good social position. The second example is a 1570s depiction of a courtesan, which is revealed by the horned hairstyle. By the end of the century this underbust style with only see through fabric covering breasts, had become respectable. In the last example it's shown on the wife of the Venetian doge in 1597.

Around the same time, at the very end of 1500s, the extremely low cut bodice fashion enters rest of Europe. The low cut style was present in the bodices of all classes, but the nipple was really only an aristocrat thing. The lower classes would cover their breasts with a partlet, that was not sheer. Bare breast was ironically from our perspective a show of innocence, youthful beauty and virtue, and to pull off the style with respect, you also had to embody those ideals. Lower class women were considered inherently vulgar and lacking virtue, so a nipple in their case was seen as indecent. Bare boobs were also a sort of status symbol, since the upper class would hire wet nurses to breastfeed their children so they could show of their youthful boobs.

Covering partlets and bodices were still also used in the first decade of 1600s by nobles and the nip slip was mostly reserved for the courtly events. The first image below is an early example of English extremely low neckline that certainly couldn't contain boobs even with a bit of movement from 1597. The 1610s started around 5 decades of fashion that showed the whole boob. The first three were the most extreme. Here's some highlights: The second image is from 1619.

Here the first, very much showing nipples, from c. 1630. The second from 1632.

The neckline would slowly and slightly rise during the next decades, but nip slips were still expected. Here's an example from 1649 and then from 1650-55. In 1660s the neckline would get still slightly higher and by 1870s it was in a not very slippable hight. The necklines would stay low for the next century, though mostly not in boob showing territory, but we'll get there. But I will say that covering the neckline in casual context was expected. Boobs were mostly for fancy occasions. It was considered vain to show off your boobs when the occasion didn't call for it and covering up during the day was necessary for a respectable lady. You wouldn't want to have tan in your milk-white skin like a poor, and also they didn't have sun screen so burning was a reasonable concern.

1720s to 1740s saw necklines that went to the nip slip territory, though they didn't go quite as low as 100 years earlier. The nipple was present in the French courtly fashion especially and rouging your nipples to enhance them was popular. Émilie Du Châtelet (1706-1749), who was an accomplished physicist and made contributions to Newtonian mechanics, was known in the French court to show off her boobies. An icon. Here she is in 1748. Here's another example from this era from 1728.

The Rococo neckline never got high, but in the middle of the century it was less low till 1770s when it plunged into new lows. In 1770s the fashion reached a saturation point, when everything was the most. This included boobs. The most boob visible. There was a change in the attitudes though. The visible boob was not a scandal, but it was risque, instead of sing of innocent and did cause offense in certain circles. I think it's because of the French revolution values gaining momentum. I talked about this in length in another post, mostly in context of masculinity, but till that point femininity and masculinity had been mostly reserved for the aristocracy. Gender performance was mostly performance of wealth. The revolutionaries constructed new masculinity and femininity, which laid the groundwork for the modern gender, in opposition to the aristocracy and their decadence. The new femininity was decent, moral and motherly, an early version of the Victorian angel of the house. The boob was present in the revolutionary imagery, but in an abstract presentation. I can't say for sure, but I think bare breasts became indecent because it was specifically fashion of the indecent French aristocracy.

Here's example somewhere from the decade and another from 1778. The neckline stayed quite low for the 1780s, but rose to cover the boobs for the 1790s.

The nipple didn't stay hidden for long but made a quick comeback in the Regency evening fashion. It was somewhat scandalous by this point, and the nipple and sheer fabrics of the Regency fashion gained much scorn and satire. The styles that were in the high danger nip slip territory and those that allowed the nipple to show through fabric, were still quite popular. The sleeves had been mid length for two centuries, but in 1790s they had made a (rough) split between formal and informal wear. The evening sleeves were tiny, just covering the shoulder. Showing that would have been a little too much. Like a bare boob? A risque choice but fine. A shoulder? Straight to the horny jail. (I'm joking they did have sheer sleeves and sometimes portraits with exposed shoulder.) But long sleeves became the standard part of the day wear. Getting sun was still not acceptable for the same reasonable and unreasonable reasons. Day dresses did also usually have higher necklines or were at least worn with a chemisette to cover the neckline. Fine Indian muslin was a huge trend. It was extremely sheer and used in multiple layers to build up some cover. There were claims that a gust of wind would render the ladies practically naked, though because they were wearing their underclothing including a shift, which certainly wasn't made from the very expensive muslin, I'm guessing this was an exaggeration. Especially though in the first decade, short underboob stays were fairly popular, so combined with a muslin, nipples were seen. Here's an early 1798 example of exactly that. The short stays did disappear eventually, but in 1810s the extremely small bodices did provide nip slip opportunities, as seen in this 1811 fashion plate.

Victorian moralizing did fully kill the nip slip, though at least they were gender neutral about it. The male nipple was just as offensive to them. In 1890s, when bodybuilding became a big thing, bodybuilder men were arrested for public indecency for not wearing a shirt.

[skunkes]

swatched my watercolors onto my sketchbook (that is not made for em at all 🫶) for Fun and Pretty Colors reasons

[monarchamos]

yuri skk who cheered

[eaudera]

quick portrait of marsai martin

ig / twt

[quartzteph]

Recently went to one of those places where you can paint pottery, so I did an evil little flask >:)

[annlarimer]

Shiny Vaporeon. Acrylic on UPS label 228.

[johnnyshrine]

★ 015 // “Thermal Label Print”

[gloomyshoujo]

Day 8 for huevember!

I'm genuinely extremely happy and excited by this piece! I had a very specific vision for it, and it came out pretty close to how I wanted it.

Again, I tried to render (all in 1 hue) to challenge myself. I purposely wanted the piece to have low contrast and eye straining colours, to the point it almost blends into the bg? It was a real challenge, since I usually stride for stronger contrast. As for the idea/theme, it just kept flashing in my head for a while and wouldn't leave me alone lol. Which is good, because I really want to explore certain themes with my art this year.:-V

[thegracklecackle]

Some work meeting doodles, I'll probably turn some of these digital when I get home

[tswwwit]

Imagine, if you will, a scene (I’m bad at drawing):

Panel 1: Bill cipher, evading self reflection and empathy for a literal eternity

Panel 2: around the corner, Dipper Pines, holding a baseball bat with determination

The poor bastard never saw it coming 😔