#Reducing Inequality

[christelhouse]

Quality Education in Developing Countries: Christel House’s Impact

Understanding the role of quality education in transforming under-resourced communities through Christel House’s initiatives.

[familythings]

How AI is Revolutionizing Crime Investigation

The British police are really getting into the awesome possibilities of artificial intelligence (AI) to crack some of the country’s toughest and oldest cases. According to cool reports from British media, the Avon and Somerset Police are testing out some cutting-edge tech that digs up useful info that might’ve been missed in traditional investigations. This nifty AI gadget, called Soze and…

[broodsys]

"if people work to address the underlying conditions that support systems of interpersonal harm rather than routinely and loudly punishing everyone who looks like those who have caused harm, then they're just as bad as those who have caused harm" sure is a wild take that's remarkably popular rn

[greenthestral]

Breaking Barriers: Achieving Goal 10 - Reduced Inequality for a Fairer World

Reducing inequality is a fundamental pillar for creating a just and prosperous society. As we progress into the future, it becomes imperative to address the disparities that hinder progress and restrict opportunities for individuals and communities. United Nations' Sustainable Development Goal 10, aptly named "Reduced Inequality," aims to tackle this issue head-on, fostering a more inclusive world. In this article, we delve into the significance of Goal 10 and explore various strategies that can help us overcome barriers and achieve a fairer and more equitable society.

Understanding the Goal

Goal 10, part of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, is a critical global commitment that aims to tackle the issue of inequality within and among countries. It recognizes that reducing inequality is not only a matter of social justice but also a fundamental prerequisite for achieving sustainable development.

At its core, Goal 10 seeks to ensure equal opportunities for all individuals, irrespective of their socio-economic background, gender, age, disability, or any other form of marginalization. By addressing disparities and promoting inclusivity, the goal aims to create a world where everyone can thrive and contribute to their fullest potential.

One of the key principles of Goal 10 is the concept of "leaving no one behind." It recognizes that progress should not be measured solely by overall economic growth but also by the extent to which it reaches and benefits all segments of society, particularly the most vulnerable and marginalized populations. This includes addressing income inequality, gender disparities, social exclusion, and the empowerment of marginalized communities.

Income inequality is a significant aspect of Goal 10. It focuses on bridging the gap between the rich and the poor by promoting fair and inclusive economic growth. This involves implementing policies that ensure equitable distribution of wealth and income, such as progressive taxation, social protection measures, and inclusive labor markets. By addressing income disparities, societies can create more balanced and just economic systems that provide opportunities for upward mobility and social cohesion.

Gender inequality is another crucial dimension of Goal 10. It recognizes that women and girls often face unique challenges and barriers that hinder their full participation in society. Achieving gender equality involves ensuring equal access to education, healthcare, employment, and political representation for women and girls. By empowering women and promoting gender equality, societies can unlock the untapped potential of half of their population and foster more inclusive and sustainable development.

Addressing social exclusion is a key component of Goal 10. It acknowledges that discrimination based on race, ethnicity, religion, or disability can perpetuate inequalities and limit opportunities for certain groups. By promoting inclusive policies and combating discrimination, societies can create environments that value diversity, foster social cohesion, and respect the rights and dignity of all individuals. This includes initiatives such as inclusive education, access to healthcare, and promoting cultural acceptance and understanding.

Moreover, Goal 10 emphasizes the importance of empowering marginalized communities and ensuring their inclusion in decision-making processes. This includes providing targeted support and resources to overcome historical disadvantages and promoting inclusive governance structures. By giving voice and agency to marginalized groups, societies can address the specific challenges they face and create more equitable and participatory societies.

Achieving Goal 10 also requires investing in sustainable development. Recognizing the interlinkages between social, economic, and environmental dimensions, the goal emphasizes the need for infrastructure development, innovation, and technology transfer in marginalized areas. By providing access to clean energy, improving transportation networks, and promoting sustainable practices, societies can bridge the gap between developed and developing regions, reducing inequalities and ensuring a more sustainable future for all.

In conclusion, Goal 10 - Reduced Inequality, is a vital component of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. By addressing disparities and promoting inclusivity, it strives to create a world where everyone has equal opportunities to thrive and contribute. Through efforts to reduce income inequality, bridge gender gaps, combat social exclusion, empower marginalized communities, and invest in sustainable development, societies can move closer to achieving this ambitious goal. By working collectively and leaving no one behind, we can build a fairer and more equitable world for present and future generations.

The Impact of Inequality

Inequality, in all its manifestations, has far-reaching consequences that undermine social cohesion, impede economic growth, and hinder sustainable development. By perpetuating cycles of poverty and exclusion, inequality restricts access to essential resources and opportunities, such as education, healthcare, and basic services. As a result, individuals and communities are trapped in circumstances that limit their potential for advancement and improvement.

One of the most significant consequences of inequality is its adverse impact on social mobility. When opportunities for upward mobility are limited or unevenly distributed, individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds face significant barriers to improving their socio-economic status. This lack of mobility not only affects individuals but also has broader implications for society as a whole. It hampers the overall progress and economic growth of a nation, as talent and potential remain untapped due to systemic barriers.

Moreover, inequality exacerbates social tensions and can lead to heightened levels of conflict and instability within nations. When a significant portion of the population feels marginalized and excluded from the benefits of development, it creates a fertile ground for social unrest and discontent. In extreme cases, this can escalate into political instability and social upheaval, with severe implications for peace and security.

Inequality also has adverse effects on health outcomes and access to quality healthcare. Individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds often face greater health risks and reduced access to essential healthcare services. The lack of resources and opportunities to maintain good health and well-being further perpetuates the cycle of inequality. This, in turn, leads to a less productive and healthy workforce, hindering economic growth and development.

Education is another area where inequality has a profound impact. Limited access to quality education perpetuates disparities and reinforces existing inequalities. When individuals are denied access to education or receive substandard education due to their socio-economic status, it limits their potential for personal and professional growth. Education is a powerful tool for social and economic empowerment, and unequal access to it perpetuates intergenerational cycles of disadvantage.

Furthermore, inequality has environmental implications. Disadvantaged communities often bear the brunt of environmental degradation and pollution. They have limited access to clean air, water, and sanitation, which further exacerbates health disparities. Additionally, inequality can lead to unequal exposure to the impacts of climate change, with marginalized communities being disproportionately affected by extreme weather events and natural disasters.

Understanding the impact of inequality is crucial in recognizing the urgency and significance of Goal 10 - Reduced Inequality. By comprehending the negative consequences of inequality on social cohesion, economic growth, and sustainable development, we can appreciate the importance of addressing this issue. Goal 10 seeks to rectify these disparities by promoting inclusive policies and initiatives that provide equal opportunities for all, regardless of their background or circumstances.

By reducing inequality, societies can foster social cohesion, where individuals feel valued and included, contributing to a more harmonious and prosperous world. Economic growth becomes more sustainable when it benefits a broader range of people, ensuring that progress is shared equitably. By breaking the cycles of poverty and exclusion, Goal 10 creates pathways for individuals to improve their lives, fostering social mobility and empowerment.

In conclusion, inequality undermines the fabric of societies, hindering social cohesion, economic growth, and sustainable development. It perpetuates cycles of poverty, limits access to education, healthcare, and basic services, and exacerbates social tensions. By understanding the impact of inequality, we realize the urgent need to address this issue. Goal 10 - Reduced Inequality plays a vital role in shaping a more inclusive and harmonious world, where everyone has equal opportunities to thrive and contribute to their fullest potential.

Tackling Income Inequality

Income inequality is a significant facet of overall inequality that demands attention and concerted efforts to promote a fair distribution of wealth and income. It is crucial for a well-functioning society to ensure that individuals have equal access to resources and opportunities, regardless of their socio-economic background. By addressing income inequality, policymakers can work towards creating a more inclusive and just society.

One of the key strategies to tackle income inequality is through implementing progressive taxation. Progressive taxation involves levying higher tax rates on individuals with higher incomes. This approach ensures that those who can afford to contribute more to society do so, enabling the government to allocate resources towards public goods and services that benefit everyone. Progressive taxation helps redistribute wealth, reduce income disparities, and create a more equitable society.

Ensuring living wages is another essential aspect of reducing income inequality. A living wage is the minimum income necessary for an individual or household to meet their basic needs, such as food, housing, healthcare, and education. By establishing policies that mandate employers to pay fair wages that meet or exceed the living wage, policymakers can help lift individuals and families out of poverty and reduce income inequality. This approach promotes economic stability, improves living standards, and empowers individuals to participate fully in the economy.

Promoting inclusive economic growth is also critical in addressing income inequality. It involves creating an economic environment that benefits all sections of society, including marginalized and disadvantaged groups. Policymakers can focus on implementing policies that foster entrepreneurship, encourage job creation, and support small and medium-sized enterprises. Additionally, investing in infrastructure development, particularly in underserved areas, can create opportunities for economic growth and reduce regional income disparities. By prioritizing inclusive economic growth, policymakers can ensure that the benefits of development are shared equitably, leading to a more balanced and fair society.

Investing in quality education and skill development programs is instrumental in empowering individuals to overcome economic barriers and access better opportunities. Education plays a crucial role in providing individuals with the knowledge and skills necessary for economic mobility. By improving access to quality education at all levels, policymakers can ensure that individuals from all backgrounds have an equal chance to succeed. Additionally, investing in vocational training and skill development programs equips individuals with the skills needed to thrive in the job market, enhancing their employability and earning potential. By promoting equal access to education and skills development, policymakers can help level the playing field and reduce income disparities.

Furthermore, addressing income inequality requires addressing systemic barriers and discrimination that limit opportunities for certain groups. Policymakers can work towards eliminating gender-based pay gaps, ensuring equal access to employment, and providing support for historically marginalized communities. By implementing policies and initiatives that promote diversity and inclusion in the workplace, policymakers can create an environment that fosters equal opportunities for all, regardless of gender, race, ethnicity, or other forms of identity. This approach contributes to a more equitable distribution of income and wealth.

Income inequality is a significant aspect of overall inequality that requires focused attention. Policymakers can play a crucial role in addressing income disparities by implementing progressive taxation, ensuring living wages, promoting inclusive economic growth, and investing in quality education and skill development programs. By adopting these strategies, societies can strive towards a more equitable distribution of wealth and income, creating opportunities for individuals to overcome economic barriers and access better opportunities. Ultimately, reducing income inequality contributes to a more just and inclusive society where everyone can thrive and contribute to their fullest potential.

Bridging Gender Gaps

Gender inequality continues to persist as a significant global challenge, and addressing this issue is a key focus of Goal 10 - Reduced Inequality. Empowering women and girls and bridging gender gaps is essential for creating a more equitable and inclusive society. By promoting equal access to education, healthcare, and employment opportunities, societies can unlock the full potential of women and benefit from their valuable contributions in various spheres.

Equal access to education is a fundamental aspect of achieving gender equality. By ensuring that girls have the same opportunities as boys to receive quality education, societies can break the cycle of gender inequality and empower women to pursue their aspirations. Access to education equips women with knowledge and skills, enabling them to participate fully in social, economic, and political life. Additionally, investing in girls' education has a multiplier effect, leading to positive outcomes for families, communities, and future generations.

Addressing gender disparities in healthcare is another critical step towards achieving gender equality. Women and girls often face unique health challenges, and unequal access to healthcare exacerbates these disparities. By providing gender-responsive healthcare services, policymakers can ensure that women have access to reproductive health services, maternal care, and other essential healthcare interventions. By addressing gender-specific health needs and reducing barriers to healthcare access, societies can improve overall health outcomes and advance gender equality.

Equal employment opportunities and addressing discriminatory practices in the workforce are vital for achieving gender equality. Women continue to face barriers to entering certain sectors and occupations, as well as disparities in wages and career advancement. By promoting policies that eliminate gender-based discrimination and bias in hiring, promotion, and remuneration, societies can create more inclusive work environments. Additionally, providing support for work-life balance, such as affordable childcare and parental leave policies, helps women balance their caregiving responsibilities with their careers. This enables women to fully participate in the workforce and contributes to closing the gender pay gap and enhancing gender equality in economic participation.

Furthermore, engaging men and boys as allies in promoting gender equality is crucial. By challenging harmful stereotypes and norms that perpetuate gender inequality, societies can foster an environment that supports gender equality. Engaging men and boys in conversations and initiatives that promote gender equality helps to break down rigid gender roles and stereotypes, fostering a more inclusive and equitable society for all.

Achieving gender equality requires a multi-dimensional approach that involves collaboration between governments, civil society organizations, and the private sector. Policy frameworks and legislation that promote gender equality, such as laws against gender-based violence and discrimination, are crucial. Additionally, targeted interventions and programs that provide women with skills training, entrepreneurship opportunities, and access to financial resources can empower women economically and enhance their decision-making power.

Moreover, promoting women's leadership and participation in decision-making processes is essential. This includes increasing the representation of women in political and public positions, as well as promoting their participation in community and grassroots organizations. By amplifying women's voices and perspectives, societies can benefit from diverse ideas, priorities, and solutions.

Goal 10 - Reduced Inequality recognizes the importance of addressing gender inequality as a crucial component of achieving a more equitable and inclusive society. By promoting equal access to education, healthcare, and employment opportunities, as well as addressing discriminatory practices and supporting work-life balance, societies can bridge gender gaps and empower women and girls. Ensuring equal opportunities for women to participate fully in all aspects of society enables societies to tap into their full potential and benefit from their invaluable contributions. Achieving gender equality is not only a matter of justice but also a pathway to sustainable development and social progress for all.

Combating Social Exclusion

Social exclusion is a deeply concerning issue that takes various forms, including discrimination based on race, ethnicity, religion, or disability. Goal 10 of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development emphasizes the need for inclusive policies that promote diversity and prohibit discrimination in all its manifestations. It is imperative to foster an environment that embraces cultural differences, promotes tolerance, and respects the fundamental rights of every individual. By eliminating barriers and prejudices, societies can strive towards inclusivity, where everyone feels valued, respected, and can participate fully in all aspects of life.

Discrimination based on race and ethnicity is a pervasive form of social exclusion that marginalizes certain groups and perpetuates inequality. Goal 10 calls for the promotion of equal rights and opportunities for all, irrespective of their racial or ethnic background. This involves implementing policies that address systemic racism, promoting diversity and inclusion, and fostering a sense of belonging for all individuals, regardless of their racial or ethnic identity. By recognizing and appreciating the diverse backgrounds and cultures within societies, we can create a more inclusive and harmonious environment where everyone can thrive.

Religious discrimination is another form of social exclusion that undermines the principles of equality and freedom of religion. Goal 10 emphasizes the importance of promoting tolerance, understanding, and respect for diverse religious beliefs and practices. Inclusive policies and initiatives should ensure that individuals have the freedom to practice their religion without fear of discrimination or persecution. By fostering religious pluralism and promoting interfaith dialogue, societies can create an environment where different religious communities coexist peacefully, contributing to social cohesion and mutual understanding.

Addressing disability-based discrimination is essential for building inclusive societies. People with disabilities often face significant barriers to equal participation in various aspects of life, including education, employment, and access to public services. Goal 10 emphasizes the need for inclusive policies that promote the rights and well-being of persons with disabilities. This includes providing equal access to education, employment opportunities, and barrier-free infrastructure. By removing physical, attitudinal, and systemic barriers, societies can ensure that individuals with disabilities can fully participate and contribute to society.

Creating inclusive societies also involves fostering a culture of respect for human rights. Goal 10 emphasizes the importance of upholding and promoting the principles of equality, non-discrimination, and justice. It calls for the implementation of legislation and policies that protect individuals from discrimination based on any grounds, including race, ethnicity, religion, or disability. By ensuring that everyone has equal protection under the law and equal access to justice, societies can build a foundation for inclusivity and social cohesion.

Education and awareness play a crucial role in promoting inclusion and combating social exclusion. By integrating inclusive education into school curricula and promoting awareness campaigns, societies can challenge stereotypes, prejudices, and discriminatory attitudes. Education can empower individuals to recognize the value of diversity, foster empathy and understanding, and promote social inclusion from an early age.

Moreover, promoting diversity and inclusion in all spheres of society, including the workplace, is essential. Companies and organizations should adopt inclusive practices that promote diversity, equality, and non-discrimination. This includes implementing equal employment opportunities, diverse recruitment processes, and providing a supportive and inclusive work environment. By embracing diverse perspectives, experiences, and talents, organizations can foster innovation, creativity, and productivity.

Social exclusion manifests in various forms, including discrimination based on race, ethnicity, religion, or disability. Goal 10 of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development calls for inclusive policies that promote diversity, prohibit discrimination, and foster inclusive societies. By embracing cultural differences, promoting tolerance, and respecting human rights, societies can eliminate barriers and prejudices. Creating an inclusive environment where everyone feels valued and can participate fully is not only a matter of justice and equality but also a catalyst for social progress, cohesion, and sustainable development.

Empowering Marginalized Communities

Marginalized communities, including those based on race, ethnicity, gender, socio-economic status, and other factors, often face significant challenges in accessing opportunities and resources. Goal 10 of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development recognizes the importance of empowering these communities and ensuring their inclusion in decision-making processes. By addressing the unique barriers they face and providing targeted support, societies can work towards leveling the playing field and enabling marginalized groups to overcome historical disadvantages.

One important approach to empower marginalized communities is through the implementation of affirmative action policies. Affirmative action aims to redress historical inequalities and create opportunities for individuals from marginalized backgrounds. These policies can include measures such as preferential hiring, quotas in education, and targeted support for entrepreneurship and economic development. By providing these opportunities, societies can help bridge the gap and create a more equitable and inclusive society.

In addition to affirmative action, strengthening social safety nets is crucial in supporting marginalized communities. Social safety nets encompass programs such as social assistance, healthcare, and access to basic services. By ensuring that marginalized individuals and communities have access to these essential services, societies can mitigate the impact of inequality and provide a foundation for social and economic well-being. Strengthening social safety nets can help lift individuals and communities out of poverty, reduce vulnerability, and promote social inclusion.

Promoting inclusive governance is another vital aspect of reducing inequality and empowering marginalized communities. Inclusive governance involves ensuring that marginalized groups have a voice in decision-making processes that affect their lives. It requires creating spaces for participation, consultation, and representation of marginalized communities in policy development, implementation, and monitoring. By including diverse perspectives, societies can make more informed and equitable decisions, and address the specific needs and concerns of marginalized communities.

Education plays a pivotal role in empowering marginalized communities and breaking the cycle of inequality. Goal 10 highlights the importance of providing equal access to quality education for all individuals, regardless of their background. By investing in education systems that are inclusive and culturally responsive, societies can create opportunities for marginalized communities to acquire knowledge, skills, and capacities necessary for social and economic mobility. It is crucial to address barriers to education, such as lack of infrastructure, discrimination, and gender-based biases, to ensure that marginalized individuals have equal opportunities to succeed.

Furthermore, addressing the root causes of marginalization and discrimination is essential. Societies must work towards eliminating systemic barriers, biases, and prejudices that perpetuate inequality. This requires promoting awareness, challenging stereotypes, and fostering a culture of inclusivity and respect. Creating spaces for dialogue and engagement between marginalized communities and broader society can help foster understanding, empathy, and solidarity.

Economic empowerment is a key factor in reducing inequality and empowering marginalized communities. This can be achieved through targeted economic development initiatives that promote entrepreneurship, job creation, and access to financial resources. By providing marginalized individuals and communities with the tools and resources they need to thrive economically, societies can help break the cycle of poverty and inequality.

Lastly, it is crucial to recognize and celebrate the strengths and contributions of marginalized communities. Promoting diversity and cultural appreciation can help combat stereotypes and create a more inclusive society. By valuing and respecting the unique perspectives, knowledge, and experiences of marginalized communities, societies can foster social cohesion and harness the potential of all individuals.

In conclusion, Goal 10 emphasizes the importance of empowering marginalized communities and reducing inequality. Through affirmative action policies, strengthening social safety nets, promoting inclusive governance, investing in education, addressing systemic barriers, and fostering economic empowerment, societies can work towards a more equitable and inclusive society. By ensuring that marginalized communities have equal access to opportunities and resources, societies can unlock their full potential and create a more just and prosperous future for all.

Investing in Sustainable Development

Reducing inequality is intricately connected to the principles of sustainable development. Goal 10 of the 2030 Agenda recognizes the significance of investing in infrastructure, innovation, and technology in marginalized areas to address the disparities between developed and developing regions. By focusing on sustainable practices and ensuring equal access to essential services, societies can create opportunities, bridge the gap, and foster inclusive and resilient communities.

One critical aspect of reducing inequality is improving infrastructure in marginalized areas. Access to reliable and sustainable infrastructure, such as transportation networks, water and sanitation systems, and energy services, is essential for economic growth, social development, and poverty reduction. By investing in the development of infrastructure in marginalized regions, societies can facilitate the movement of goods, services, and people, connecting communities and providing access to markets, education, healthcare, and other vital resources. This helps to create equal opportunities and enhance the quality of life for all individuals, regardless of their geographic location.

In particular, access to clean energy is crucial in reducing inequality and promoting sustainable development. Energy poverty disproportionately affects marginalized communities, hindering their access to education, healthcare, and economic opportunities. Goal 10 emphasizes the importance of expanding access to affordable, reliable, and modern energy sources, particularly in underserved areas. By investing in renewable energy solutions and improving energy efficiency, societies can not only reduce inequalities but also mitigate the environmental impact associated with conventional energy sources, contributing to a more sustainable future for all.

Sustainable practices and environmental conservation also play a vital role in reducing inequality and promoting inclusive development. Goal 10 recognizes that the pursuit of economic growth should be accompanied by responsible consumption and production patterns. By prioritizing environmental sustainability, societies can prevent further exacerbation of inequalities and ensure a better future for all. Sustainable agriculture, for example, promotes food security, reduces environmental degradation, and provides income-generating opportunities for small-scale farmers. Similarly, adopting sustainable forestry practices can protect ecosystems, preserve biodiversity, and support the livelihoods of indigenous and marginalized communities.

Moreover, the promotion of innovation and technology is crucial in reducing inequalities and advancing sustainable development. Goal 10 emphasizes the need to enhance the technological capabilities of marginalized regions and promote research and development to foster inclusive growth. By investing in innovation and technology, societies can bridge the digital divide, provide access to information and communication technologies, and empower marginalized communities to participate in the global economy. This helps create opportunities for education, entrepreneurship, and access to markets, contributing to the reduction of inequalities and the promotion of sustainable economic development.

Inclusive and sustainable urbanization is another important aspect of reducing inequality. Goal 10 recognizes the importance of creating cities and human settlements that are inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable. By prioritizing affordable housing, accessible transportation, green spaces, and social infrastructure, societies can ensure that marginalized communities have equal access to urban opportunities and services. This helps prevent the concentration of wealth and resources in specific areas, promoting balanced development and reducing spatial inequalities.

Furthermore, the participation of marginalized communities in decision-making processes is crucial for sustainable development and reducing inequality. Goal 10 emphasizes the importance of promoting inclusive institutions and ensuring that marginalized voices are heard in policy formulation and implementation. By engaging marginalized communities in decision-making processes, societies can ensure that their specific needs, concerns, and aspirations are taken into account, contributing to more equitable and inclusive development outcomes.

In conclusion, reducing inequality is closely linked to sustainable development. Goal 10 highlights the importance of investing in infrastructure, innovation, and technology in marginalized areas to bridge the gap between developed and developing regions. By providing equal access to clean energy, improving transportation networks, promoting sustainable practices, and prioritizing environmental sustainability, societies can create equal opportunities and foster inclusive and resilient communities. By embracing the principles of sustainable development, societies can work towards a more equitable and sustainable future for all individuals, leaving no one behind.

Strengthening Global Partnerships

Achieving Goal 10, which aims to reduce inequality within and among countries, requires collaborative efforts on a global scale. Governments, civil society organizations, and the private sector all have important roles to play in implementing effective policies and initiatives that promote equality and inclusivity. By working together and fostering partnerships, we can combine resources, knowledge, and expertise to address the root causes of inequality and create lasting change.

One of the key aspects of achieving Goal 10 is strengthening international cooperation. Inequality is not confined to national boundaries; it is a global challenge that requires collective action. Governments need to collaborate and share best practices to develop comprehensive policies that address inequality at both the national and international levels. International organizations and forums provide platforms for dialogue and cooperation, enabling countries to learn from each other's experiences and develop joint strategies to tackle inequality effectively.

Promoting fair trade is another important component of reducing inequality. Global trade can play a significant role in creating economic opportunities and reducing poverty. However, unfair trade practices, such as tariff barriers, subsidies, and market access restrictions, can exacerbate inequalities and hinder the development of disadvantaged regions. Goal 10 emphasizes the need for fair and equitable trade rules that promote inclusive and sustainable economic growth. By addressing trade imbalances and ensuring a level playing field, countries can promote inclusive economic development and reduce inequality within and among nations.

Increasing development assistance to disadvantaged regions is a crucial step in reducing inequality. Official Development Assistance (ODA) plays a vital role in supporting developing countries in their efforts to address inequality and achieve sustainable development. Goal 10 calls for the fulfillment of ODA commitments and the provision of additional resources to countries most in need. By increasing financial assistance, technology transfer, and capacity-building support, the international community can help level the playing field and enable disadvantaged regions to overcome structural barriers and achieve equitable development.

Public-private partnerships are essential in driving progress towards Goal 10. The private sector has a significant role to play in promoting inclusive growth, creating jobs, and supporting sustainable development. By aligning business strategies with social and environmental objectives, companies can contribute to reducing inequality. Collaboration between the private sector, governments, and civil society organizations can lead to innovative solutions and investments in sectors that directly impact marginalized communities, such as education, healthcare, and infrastructure development. Through responsible business practices and investments, the private sector can help create equal opportunities and contribute to sustainable and inclusive development.

Civil society organizations also play a crucial role in advancing Goal 10. They serve as advocates for marginalized communities, holding governments and other stakeholders accountable for their commitments to reducing inequality. Civil society organizations work on the ground, engaging with communities, and providing valuable insights and perspectives that inform policy-making processes. Their expertise and grassroots connections can help ensure that policies and initiatives are inclusive, responsive, and address the specific needs of marginalized groups.

Furthermore, knowledge sharing and capacity-building initiatives are essential for achieving Goal 10. Governments, organizations, and academia need to collaborate in generating and disseminating research, data, and best practices on reducing inequality. This exchange of knowledge and expertise can inform policy decisions and enhance the effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing inequality. Capacity-building programs can also empower individuals and organizations to address inequality effectively, equipping them with the skills and resources needed to implement sustainable solutions.

Achieving Goal 10 requires collaborative efforts on a global scale. Governments, civil society organizations, and the private sector must work together, sharing resources, knowledge, and expertise, to implement effective policies and initiatives. Strengthening international cooperation, promoting fair trade, increasing development assistance, fostering public-private partnerships, and supporting civil society organizations are crucial steps towards reducing inequality worldwide. By joining forces and leveraging collective strengths, we can make significant progress in creating a more equitable and inclusive world for all.

Conclusion

Goal 10 - Reduced Inequality, represents a bold and necessary vision for a fairer and more inclusive world. By addressing income inequality, bridging gender gaps, combating social exclusion, empowering marginalized communities, and investing in sustainable development, we can overcome barriers and create a society where everyone has equal opportunities to succeed. Achieving this goal requires the collective efforts of individuals, governments, and organizations worldwide. Let us strive together to break down the walls of inequality and build a brighter future for all.

[lestis]

At first i thought this was referring to what happened in March 2020, but no. Things haven’t changed! Even as far back as 1918 this was happening! (More on that later.)

The health center in this case was in Seattle, not Canada, but it’s close to the border for a reason. it’s explained further by this article:

When Canada shut its borders to stem the flow of COVID-19 last year, people continued to cross freely into Indigenous communities in Ontario and B.C. by water—mingling with residents who had scarce access to masks or even clean water for hand washing.

Native communities in both the US and Canada are severely neglected and actively endangered.

Indigenous people weren't consulted when lockdowns happened. They don't have a seat at the table. Whether you're talking about the federal, provincial or the local level, they're not asked their opinion. In B.C., the federal government closed borders without their knowledge.

In Ontario, when they opened up the province in July, they didn't talk to First Nations people. They didn't seem to realize people would get in their boats and come to the First Nations, bringing COVID to our communities. People would tie their boats off and walk into the communities like there was no pandemic. To me, that was a huge eye-opening piece. (University of Toronto)

It's expected that epidemics hurt those of lower socioeconomic means in particular, which many tribes are unfortunately within. Other communities of color—specifically Pacific Islander, Latino and Black communities—were hit heavily as well, having a "COVID-19 death rate of double or more that of White and Asian Americans."

Indigenous communities still have the highest percentage of deaths, which the Great Falls Tribune attributes to long-term disinvestment, racist public policies, ongoing settler colonialism. Chronic underfunding (especially in healthcare) with outdated machinery, crowded homes and deficient plumbing also contribute to the issue. Many reservations have little access to clean water, despite tribal water rights legally recognized for over a century. It makes sense that on reservations in particular, there often isn't enough room for people to quarantine the way that most of us are able to.

Native American communities are often the latest to be addressed when it comes to federal resources. This is consistent with what happened in 1918, which Dana Hedgpeth of the Washington Post pointed out in her article "Native American tribes were already being wiped out. Then the 1918 flu hit" (unfortunately the whole article is behind the paywall).

Frustratingly, articles such as this one attribute the high death toll to (as well as underlying health conditions), "lack of institutional resilience, the relationship between the federal governments and tribal governments, and lack of social trust." This may be true, but if so is not unwarranted given the many, many legally-binding treaties that have not been upheld. There is a whole History article on Broken Treaties with indigenous populations, and that's only covering some of the most famous ones!

Not to mention that Indigenous Americans have lower life expectancy and significantly disproportionate rates of diseases and chronic conditions, which as we know makes them all the more vulnerable to death upon contracting disease. In fact, an analysis of disparities conducted by the Federal Health Program for American Indians and Alaska Natives states, "American Indians and Alaska Natives continue to die at higher rates than other Americans in many categories, including chronic liver disease and cirrhosis, diabetes mellitus, unintentional injuries, assault/homicide, intentional self-harm/suicide, and chronic lower respiratory diseases."

Suffice to say, despite the many leaps in indigenous representation and recognition, indigenous tribes are often given the short end of the stick, especially when it comes to healthcare. We have to make it so that the next time something like this happens—and make no mistake, it will happen—things will be different.

[sayruq]

Dear Mark Zuckerberg and Leadership, This letter is a follow-up to the letter that was circulated internally on Dec 19, 2023 and deleted and dismissed due to our Community Engagement Expectations (CEE) on what can be discussed internally. Hence, we are sharing our concerns externally. We, Meta employees, wish to express our disappointment and astonishment at the lack of acknowledgement and care the leaders of this company have shown toward the Palestinian community and its allies. In private conversations, we hear from our Palestinian colleagues about family members they have lost in Gaza and family they are working tirelessly to find safety for. However, any open support for our Palestinian colleagues or the millions facing a humanitarian crisis in Palestine is met with internal censorship of employee concerns, biased leadership statements showing one-sided support, and external censorship that is raising public alarm and distrust of our platforms. Internally, we have called out the months of silencing within our workplace forums. While we loudly display “Your voice is valued”, CEE is used as a guise to delete dissenting opinions and silence employees that may simply be seeking solace from their coworkers or raising awareness about building safer products. While in other companies, employees within Employee Resource Groups (ERG) are allowed to connect and speak freely with each other, ERG’s such as Muslims@ and Palestinians@ have faced so much censorship that an employee proposed just deleting the ERG altogether instead of giving the illusion that we can freely build community at Meta. CEE claims to reduce disruptions in our workplace, yet censorship from CEE has caused many of us at Meta to feel disrupted, unheard, and unsafe to the point that several of our Metamates have decided to resign. In the words of our former colleague, any mention of Palestine is taken down - Even when the post was from a colleague expressing their grief. Even when the post was to celebrate the UN International day of support to the Palestinian people. Even when the post is a link to a fundraiser to help the Gazans. Even when asking questions about product bugs that affect Palestinian voices.

One of the original core values of Facebook was to “Be Open” and our current values claim that “We create a culture where we are straightforward and willing to have hard conversations with each other.” Employees have always been first responders to surface issues raised externally to those internally with the power and knowledge to fix them. However when over 450 colleagues came together to sign a letter similar to this one in December, CEE was used to delete the letter and restrict one of the writers from their work devices for over two months while the workplace, product, and policy concerns brought forth were completely ignored. Employees have attempted to raise product concerns related to the conflict only to have their posts and comments censored or dismissed throughout internal channels. Most recently, questions about investigative reports indicating the possibility of governments, ISPs, and coordinated bad actors using Whatsapp data for military targeting have been met with dismissive and insufficient responses or outright deleted throughout internal forums. Meta leaders have posted numerous strong statements of support for our Israeli colleagues along with condemnation of the attack on Israel on October 7th that took the lives of ~1,200 civilians, both on internal and external platforms. Mark stated on his public Facebook - “The terrorist attacks by Hamas are pure evil. There is never any justification for carrying out acts of terrorism against innocent people. The widespread suffering that has resulted is devastating. My focus remains on the safety of our employees and their families in Israel and the region.”

However, bias and inequity is painfully apparent when those same leaders do not similarly share support for our Palestinian colleagues and allies nor condemnation of the attacks on Palestine, which have now taken ~35,000 civilian lives and created a humanitarian crisis of displacement and starvation for ~2 million Palestinians. This has created a hostile and unsafe work environment for hundreds of our Palestinian, Arab, Muslim, anti-Zionist Jew, and anti-genocide colleagues at the company, who have felt consistently alienated and uncomfortable at work. Many have tried to articulate this through posts on Workplace only to be censored, rebuffed, and/or penalized. Feedback shared directly with leadership on Workplace Chat has been met with dismissiveness. Bias and inequity for the human rights and humanitarian crisis in Gaza is also apparent when compared to the Russian invasion of Ukraine, after which there was an outpouring of leadership support on all fronts, including additional resourcing and investment through various social impact initiatives. The lights in the Dublin office were even painted with the colors of the Ukraine flag. Leadership must do better to achieve true equity and inclusion. Externally, when it comes to Palestine, the dismissive tone and lack of investment by Meta is not new and the company has consistently failed to thoroughly take action on years of evidence of suppression of Palestinian voices on our platforms worldwide. In 2024 the company is still slowly addressing the findings of an independent audit influenced by Human Rights Watch’s (HRW) 2021 letter to Meta on the Palestinian conflict 3 years ago. In the wake of October 7th, Meta has ignored reasonable requests for transparency on our content policies from Senator Elizabeth Warren and other lawmakers around the globe. Numerous civil rights organizations, some of whom are Meta partners, have been met with dismissal on the censorship concerns brought forth - leading to external petitions such as one against Meta’s proposed policy of treating “Zionist” as a proxy for "Jewish”, which collected over 52,000 signatures. While Meta denies any Palestinian censorship or bias to the public, internally groups of employee volunteers have found numerous product and policy issues with disparate impacts to Palestinian, Muslim, and Arab communities since October 7th. The few improvements that have been made were achieved only by appealing to isolated product teams, with minimal senior leadership support or resources. Furthermore, in the wake of global criticism of censorship and moderation, leading into the biggest year for democracy in history, Meta has updated its policy to no longer recommend ‘political content’ by default across Instagram and Threads without clear guidelines of how this would impact content originating from global conflict zones. Meta has continued to fail the Palestinian community through its policies and lack of investment.

“Meta.Metamate.Me.” We believe we are all Meta and are committed to respectfully working together to address the issues internally and externally, while holding firmly to the demands we have been echoing for months: We demand an end to censorship - stop deleting employee’s words internally in order to foster an inclusive environment where all communities feel seen, heard, and safe We demand acknowledgment - share internal acknowledgments of support for Palestinian colleagues and acknowledge the lives lost in the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza to recognize our shared humanity We demand transparency and accountability - allocate dedicated resources to investigate issues of censorship and biases on our platforms and openly disclose findings to build trust among employees and the public We implore you to end the silence - issue a public statement urging for an immediate, permanent ceasefire in Gaza As tech workers, we have a tremendous privilege to work on products that serve the world, and with that comes tremendous responsibility. We have been proud to work at Meta – and want to continue believing in its mission to give people the power to build community and bring the world closer together.

If you're a current or former Meta worker please sign the letter here

[afeelgoodblog]

The Best News of Last Month

Sorry for being not active this month as I had some health problems. I'll start posting weekly now :) Meanwhile here's some good from last month

1. Widow donates $1 billion to medical school, giving free tuition forever

Ruth Gottesman surprised by her late husband's $1 billion in Berkshire stock, decides to donate it in full to the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in the Bronx, New York City's poorest borough. The donation is intended to cover students' tuition indefinitely, ensuring access to medical education for generations.

A video capturing students' emotional reactions to the news, cheering and crying, circulated after the announcement, highlighting the profound impact of the donation on the medical school community.

2. Electric school buses outperform diesel in extreme cold

In Colorado's West Grand School District, electric school buses outperformed their diesel counterparts, particularly in the bitterly cold temperatures of towns like Kremmling, where morning temperatures can drop below -30 degrees Fahrenheit. Despite common concerns about reduced range in extreme weather, the electric buses maintained their battery charge even in these frigid conditions, providing reliable transportation for students.

This success has been welcomed by the school district, as diesel vehicles also face challenges in starting in Colorado's harsh winter weather.

3. Christian Bale unveils plans to build 12 foster homes in California

Christian Bale has led a tour round the new village in California where he plans to build 12 foster homes, as well as two studio flats to help children transition into independent living, and a 7,000 sq ft community centre.

The actor has spearheaded the building of a unique complex of facilities with the aim of keeping siblings in the foster care system together, and ideally under the same roof.

4. Average lifespan of a person with Down syndrome has increased from 25 years in 1983 to 60 years today

Today the average lifespan of a person with Down syndrome is approximately 60 years.

As recently as 1983, the average lifespan of a person with Down syndrome was 25 years. The dramatic increase to 60 years is largely due to the end of the inhumane practice of institutionalizing people with Down syndrome.

5. Greece legalises same-sex marriage

Greece has become the first Christian Orthodox-majority country to legalise same-sex marriage. Same-sex couples will now also be legally allowed to adopt children after Thursday's 176-76 vote in parliament.

Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis said the new law would "boldly abolish a serious inequality".

6. Massachusetts police K9 tracks scent for over 2 miles to find missing 12-year-old in freezing cold

A Massachusetts police K9 followed her nose to help find a 12-year-old who went missing in frigid temperatures last week, tracking the child’s scent for over two miles, authorities said.

K9 Biza, a female German shepherd, was called on to help after officers learned the child left their home at around 10:30 p.m. Wednesday and was last seen in the Pakachoag Hill area of Auburn, the Auburn Police Department said.

7. Good News for the Socially Anxious: People Like You a Lot More Than You Think They Do, New Research Confirms

The "Lake Wobegon effect" or "illusory superiority" phenomenon highlights people's tendency to overestimate their abilities, but recent research suggests that in social interactions, individuals often underestimate their likability and charm.

Studies indicate that people consistently fail to recognize signals of others' liking toward them, leading to a "liking gap" where individuals believe they are less likable than they actually are.

Techniques such as focusing more on others during conversations and genuinely expressing interest in them can help alleviate social anxiety by shifting the focus away from self-criticism. Ultimately, understanding that others may also experience similar anxieties can lead to a more relaxed and enjoyable social experience.

---

That's it for this week :)

This newsletter will always be free. If you liked this post you can support me with a small kofi donation here:

Buy me a coffee ❤️

Also don’t forget to reblog this post with your friends.

[sevrd-belle]

Mark kept a French propaganda poster from WW1 in his home office. This shot is centred on the poster, with Mark looking off the side.

The words “Help me…!” are highlighted.

Two empty scotch glasses sit next to him. One still has a bit of alcohol left inside of it. He’s drinking by himself in the middle of the day.

“Pour le dernier quart d’heure…”

Translation: “For the last half hour…”

The poster is lying that the war is almost over. That it can be won if supporters send money. That it’s going to end in 15 minutes. He clings to the idea that he and his wife are just going through a “phase,” that this is just the last tough stretch before things improve—just like the propaganda war poster claims victory if only citizens keep believing and contributing.

“Aidez-moi…!”

“Help me...!”

This plea could represent his internal desperation, which he refuses to say out loud in his marriage or in general as his mental health declines.

Instead of asking his wife for help or admitting what’s not working, he might channel his need for help into external distractions—like alcohol, lectures, or overworking.

Helly later becomes the first person he’s actually honest with—someone he doesn’t need to perform “noble suffering” around.

Context: France in 1917-1918 was totally worn out.

The war had dragged on longer than expected. These types of posters are state propaganda because they reduce the brutal, messy reality of WWI to an idealized / romanticized narrative to manipulate the general public of France.

No mention of the trauma, disillusionment, or class inequalities—just a narrative. Sort of like this episode brushes over Mark’s role in the dissipation of his marriage since he hasn’t faced his own trauma with alcoholism that started with his father since he was a child.

(Confirmed by Devon Scout Hale in Season 1.)

It’s how Mark and his father bonded. So he drinks two glasses to himself. Same with sharing a flask.

It’s also possible his father was his first experience with “death” that he never got over.

So the “help me!” is a double edged sword. The propaganda is for you to feel emotional and to help through sending money, but the real message is seemingly “help me break out of this manipulated / idealized narrative.”

Which he does in the final episode.

[probablyasocialecologist]

Market-based approaches to forest conservation like carbon offsets and deforestation-free certification schemes have largely failed to protect trees or alleviate poverty, according to a major scientific review published on Monday. The global study—the most comprehensive of its kind to date—found that trade and finance-driven initiatives had made "limited" progress halting deforestation and in some cases worsened economic inequality. Drawn from years of academic and field work, the report compiled by the International Union of Forest Research Organizations (IUFRO), a group of 15,000 scientists in 120 countries, will be presented at a high-level UN forum starting Monday. Its authors urged a "radical rethink" of increasingly popular market-based approaches often promoted as effective at saving forests, curbing global warming and raising living standards in developing nations. "The evidence does not support the claim of win-wins or triple wins for environment, economy and people often made for market mechanisms as a policy response to environmental problems," said contributing author Maria Brockhaus from the University of Helsinki. "Rather our cases show that poverty and forest loss both are persistent across different regions of the world... where market mechanisms have been the main policy option for decades," she told AFP by email.

Read the report here

[reflectionspace]

Veilguard and the Failures of Surface-Level Liberalism

Strap in pals of all genders and creeds, this is long.

Despite presenting itself as a progressive and inclusive RPG, Dragon Age: Veilguard is not a leftist game. It reflects the superficial politics of contemporary Western liberalism: visually diverse, rhetorically inclusive, but politically hollow. Like the modern Democratic Party in the U.S., it trades radical or transformative ideals for shallow representation, and in doing so, it reveals an underlying conservatism that both limits its storytelling and leads to unintentional ideological harm.

Before we begin, a brief note: a materialist analysis, rooted in Marxist thought, focuses on the concrete, material conditions that shape social life—such as class structure, labor, power relations, and access to resources. It asks who holds power, who produces value, and how inequality is maintained or challenged. In media, this means looking beyond what stories say and analyzing how they reflect or obscure real systems of oppression and change.

It's useful to briefly define neoliberalism. Neoliberalism is an economic and political philosophy that rose to dominance in the late 20th century. It emphasizes deregulated markets, privatization, and individual responsibility over collective solutions. Under neoliberalism, social problems are reinterpreted as personal failures, and political engagement is reduced to consumer choice. In media, neoliberal storytelling often replaces systemic critique with personal empowerment, turning collective oppression into individualized struggle and positioning social justice as a matter of branding or taste rather than structural change.

On its face, Veilguard looks like the product of progressive ideals: you can customize your character's gender presentation, choose from a visibly diverse party lineup, and engage with themes of identity and belonging. But these elements stop at the surface. The game offers no deeper vision of social change, economic transformation, or solidarity.

This mirrors the liberal fixation on identity politics without class analysis. Like the Democratic Party, Veilguard wants applause for "looking inclusive" while sidestepping the harder work of interrogating systems. It does not question who holds power, how that power reproduces itself, or what solidarity across difference might look like in practice. There is no structural critique—only aesthetic gestures. There is no vision of solidarity. It's similar to how the Democrats have been running on a platform of "vote for us or else" for decades, because their politics largely agree with the basic material premises of the other party, that being neoliberalism, and the only thing they have to offer is the "or else".

And, just so you don't brush me off as some chud, I am not American, and I cannot vote in the elections. If I were American, I would vote

Democrat, not third party candidates, for obvious reasons. It's just, from where I stand, the US has a party on the right, and a party on the far right, and leftist options aren't genuinely on the table.

Veilguard has no meaningful conception of class struggle. The party members do not grapple with class dynamics between themselves. There is no collective vision for how to reshape the world. NPCs and factions are individualized; systemic analysis is nowhere to be found.

Compare this to Final Fantasy VII Remake or Disco Elysium, which offer actual political theories, explore the costs of extraction and labor exploitation, and question the player's place in systems of oppression. Veilguard instead takes the safer path: personal identity as the only axis of oppression worth mentioning.

This isn't progressive. It's neoliberalism.

One of the clearest examples of this failure is how Veilguard handles Tevinter. In previous games, Tevinter was known for brutal class hierarchies, magical oligarchy, and chattel slavery. This should have been fertile ground for a materialist critique: a fantasy setting where the costs of empire, elite rule, and oppression could be examined.

Instead, Veilguard sanitizes Tevinter. The anti-slavery detective Neve is stripped of her struggle's stakes, because slavery is nearly invisible. Her political engagement becomes personal branding. Her character reads like a consultant's PowerPoint slide on "gritty female rep," not a fighter in a living system of exploitation.

While Tevinter should be the perfect setting to interrogate labor, class, and entrenched hierarchies, Veilguard flattens the issue of slavery into a stylized backdrop. One of the most politically loaded questions—how to dismantle slavery—is presented as a choice between two NPCs: the moderate reformer Maevaris Tilani, and the more radical Dorian Pavus. If the player saves Minrathous, they can choose between Dorian's immediate upheaval at the cost of stability, or Maevaris's slow institutional reform, which keeps Tevinter structurally weaker but more diplomatically stable. If Minrathous is not saved, Dorian simply becomes Archon by default. Mechanically, this choice only affects the ending credits and a few party member reactions, not that party member opinions actually come with consequences like in DAO or DA2.

This choice is not interrogated. It becomes a matter of player flavor, not political vision. It reduces the end of slavery—a deeply systemic issue that could have spanned quests, moral tension, and class engagement—to a question of who should be the next enlightened ruler, as though the system will simply fix itself with the right person in charge.

It's a Superman fantasy dressed in moral earnestness.

Let's have a few examples of how the lack of thinking hampers the narrative and messages of the game.

The same lack of structural thinking undermines Taash’s storyline as well. Taash is a character navigating a nonbinary identity in a supposedly transphobic and sexist society—but Veilguard never convincingly builds that society. Every major character except Shathann affirms Taash's identity without question. The arc is framed around whether the working immigrant mom will use the correct pronouns, which might be emotionally resonant if Veilguard actually depicted transphobia or gender norms in a systemic way. It doesn’t.

The setting’s supposed prejudices are surface-level inventions with no institutional or cultural weight. The Chantry is matriarchal. Women serve in every political and martial role, and conversely, men in the setting have been portrayed as caretakers, mages, academics, or healers. Transition is possible, and even accepted in Qunari society. Unlike Dorian's story—where his father's attempt to use literal blood magic to "fix" his son's sexuality comes with real stakes, taboos, and danger, or Maevaris's story of coming out and starting to live as a trans woman, to great scandal in the aristocratic society of Tevinter—Taash’s conflict lacks material consequences.

The result is that Taash’s arc feels both emotionally weightless and politically incoherent both inside the world and at a meta level. Remember, Veilguard presents a cast full of women, but often does not treat them as full people. Maternal characters are punished. And only women are expected to perfom allyship and be sexually available, whereas the male characters are exempted from caretaking beyond having quirky pets. And so on.

And while the choice between Dorian and Maevaris makes sense on a story level and I like both characters, it just underlines the lack of critical lenses in the editing room that the end result is that the new top leadership for Tevinter will always be the AMAB scion of an aristocratic family.

It's such a missed opportunity honestly, I would have loved to see a Calpernia-as-the-wildcard-newcomer-from-the-working-classes and Maevaris-as-the-aristocratic-mentor-behind-the-scenes girlboss teamup.

The treatment of the Dalish elves provides yet another example of how Veilguard lacks the empathy and complexity needed to write real diversity. Despite being a displaced diaspora with a long, storied spiritual tradition, the Dalish as a group suddenly and near-unanimously turn away from their gods once it's revealed that those gods were corrupted or false. None of them seriously grapple with the emotional or cultural weight of this loss. There is no spectrum of belief. No internal conflict. Even Bellara's brother is portrayed as mind-manipulated and corrupted by evil forces and then killed off, conveniently removing any need to engage with his ideological position.

In real-world diasporas and cultural groups, the opposite is true. Disagreement and ideological diversity are the norm. Cultural traditions, even those with flaws or dark histories, remain emotionally potent and hotly debated. Some members cling harder to old beliefs in times of crisis; others reform or reinterpret. But Veilguard sidesteps this entirely. It reduces a displaced people to a monoculture with a conveniently aligned opinion.

Based on the content in Veilguard, I am fairly sure the authors would describe themselves as feminists, and would, if asked, reject sexism or inequality between men and women, classism, racism, and so on. This failure I'm describing doesn't happen because of agreeing with the wrong ideology or support for a party or whatever.

The ultimate problem is that Veilguard is trapped inside a specific liberal worldview: one that fears complexity, refuses solidarity, and replaces structural critique with PR-friendly inclusion. It treats oppression as a set of aesthetic signifiers rather than a system. It treats politics as something that happens through identity choices, not collective action or transformation.

Really, beneath its inclusive surface, Veilguard treats its core cast not as members of a collective, but as exceptional individuals who matter more than the world around them.

In this way, the game echoes Ayn Rand's ideology: the exceptional few are the only ones worth saving, empathizing with, or narratively prioritizing.

This explains how characters like Emmrich and Harding can plan a whimsical picnic trip to the Blighted South with zero social consequence. The world is dying, half the continent has been consumed by a magical cataclysm, yet somehow the party has access to luxury food items like expensive coffee beans. There is no material scarcity or logistical tension. This also explains why the player is never allowed to tell Taash to set aside the identity struggles until after the apocalyptic threat is dealt with—because in Veilguard, individual emotional arcs matter more than shared survival. The elite chosen few still deserve their personal resolutions, no matter what collapses around them.

Nowhere is this clearer than in the Minrathous vs. Treviso decision. Mechanically, the choice has no meaningful effect on the larger world. Minrathous is doomed either way. Treviso's destruction matters only in terms of whether the male romance option, Lucanis, will date the player or not. The female option, Neve, of course, remains romantically available no matter what.

The stakes are not moral, structural, or material. They're personal and transactional.

The Blight can spread, cities can fall, but your companions still host book clubs and have access to fresh fruit. This isn't solidarity. It's elite individualism dressed in inclusive costume.

Veilguard may look inclusive, but it’s deeply status-quo. Its treatment of women, its sanitized view of systemic oppression, its Randian elevation of the elite cast over the world, and its absence of class consciousness are not just narrative flaws—they’re ideological ones. The game mirrors a liberal worldview that wants to feel like progress without doing the hard work of justice—one that smugly assumes its values are universally shared, regardless of players’ and characters' backgrounds, cultures, or material realities. As a result, it doesn't meaningfully explore what building real solidarity or inclusive political futures might require.

If we want better games—and better futures—we need to move beyond representation as window dressing. We need stories that see power, challenge structure, and believe in something greater than optics.

And we need games that don’t just let women, or black people, or sexual minorities exist.

We need games that ask why the world tries to erase them in the first place.

[mostlysignssomeportents]

Reality-Based Communities

I'm on a 20+ city book tour for my new novel PICKS AND SHOVELS. Catch me in CHICAGO with PETER SAGAL next WEDNESDAY (Apr 2), and in BLOOMINGTON next FRIDAY (Apr 4). More tour dates here.

Remember the Global War on Terror? I know, it's been a minute. But there was a time when we were all meant to take terrorism – real terrorism, the knocking-down-buildings kind, not the being-mean-to-Teslas kind – seriously.

Back in the early oughts, I remember picking up a copy of the Financial Times in an airport lounge and flipping through it, and coming across an "advice to corporate management" column in which the question was, "Should I take out terrorism insurance for my business?" The columnist's answer: "The actual risk to your business of a terrorism-related disruption rounds to zero. However: a) your shareholders don't understand this, an b) your insurance company does. That means that you can buy a very large amount of terrorism insurance for a very small amount of money, making this a cheap price to pay to mollify your easily frightened investors."

I never forgot that little piece of writing. It was a powerful reminder that successful large-scale enterprises must attend to the world as it is, not as ideology dictates that it should be. This was – and is – a deeply heterodox position among the ideological defenders of capitalism, who continue to uphold Milton Friedman's maxim that:

Truly important and significant hypotheses will be found to have "assumptions" that are wildly inaccurate descriptive representations of reality, and, in general, the more significant the theory, the more unrealistic the assumptions (in this sense)

https://pluralistic.net/2025/02/17/caliper-ai/#racism-machine

These ideologues – who often cross over from boardrooms into governments – are with the GW Bush official who dismissed a journalist as a member of the "reality-based community":

When we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors…and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality-based_community

But ultimately, someone has to make investments and plans that take accord of the world as it is, the adversaries they face, the real and material emergencies unfolding around them. When the Pentagon announces that henceforth the climate emergency will take a prime place in its threat assessments and budgets, that's not "the military going woke" – it's the military joining the reality-based community:

https://www.defensenews.com/opinion/commentary/2021/10/26/the-pentagon-has-to-include-climate-risk-in-all-of-its-plans-and-budgets/

This explains the radical shear between the Wall Street Journal's editorial page – in which you'll learn that governments can't solve any problems and markets solve all problems (including the problem of governments) – and the news reporting within, in which the critical role of the state in regulating and fueling markets is acknowledged.

The tension between the right's ideologues in boardrooms and governments and the operational people in charge of keeping the machines running has only escalated since the War on Terror days. There's an important sense in which leftists – as materialists – are playing the same game as these operational managers of capitalism. Take Thomas Piketty, the socialist economist whose blockbuster 2013 book Capital in the 21st Century argued that rising inequality threatened capitalism itself:

https://memex.craphound.com/2014/06/24/thomas-pikettys-capital-in-the-21st-century/

By analyzing three centuries' worth of capital flows, Piketty showed that when inequality reached a certain tipping point, the result was societal upheaval that continued until so much capital had been destroyed that inequality was reduced (because everyone had been pauperized). Piketty appealed to capitalism's technocrats to institute redistributive programs. His point was that building hospitals and schools was ultimately cheaper than paying for the guard-labor you'd need to keep people from building guillotines outside the gates of your walled estate.

The rise and rise of surveillance tech, and its successors, such as lethal drones and offshore gulags, can be seen as a tacit acknowledgment of Piketty's thesis. By lowering the cost of guard labor, it might possible to stabilize a society with higher levels of inequality, by identifying and neutralizing the people who are radicalized by the system's unfairness before you get an outbreak of guillotines:

https://pluralistic.net/2020/08/13/better-to-have-loved/#less-lethals

But reality is stubborn. Capitalism's defenders can insist that society will continue to function while wages stagnate and greedflation stokes the cost of living crisis, but ultimately, the military can't afford to have a fighting force that's in hock to payday lender usurers who are tormenting their families with arm-breaker collection calls:

https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2025/03/payday-loan-apps-cost-new-yorkers-500-million-plus-new-study-estimates.html

As Stein's Law – a bedrock of finance – has it, "anything that can't go on forever eventually stops." The ideologues of capitalism can insist that Luigi Mangione is a monster and an aberration, an armed freeloader who wants something for nothing. But privately, their own security forces are telling them otherwise.

Writing for The American Prospect, Daniel Boguslaw reports on a leaked intelligence dossier from the Connecticut regional intelligence center – a "fusion center" created as part of the War on Terror – wherein we learn that the American people sees Mangione as a modern Robin Hood:

https://prospect.org/justice/2025-03-27-intelligence-dossier-compares-luigi-mangione-robin-hood/

Many view Thompson as a symbolic representation of both as reports of insurance companies denying life sustaining medication coverage circulate online. It is not an unfair comparison to equate the current reaction toward Mangione to the reactions to Robin Hood, citizens may see Mangione’s alleged actions as an attack against a system designed to work against them.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hM3IZbnzk_cMk7evX2Urnwh5zxhRHpD5/view

The Connecticut fusion center isn't the only part of capitalism's operational wing that's taking notice of this. Today, Ken Klippenstein reports on an FBI threat assessment about the "heightened threat to CEOs":

https://www.kenklippenstein.com/p/fbi-becomes-rent-a-cops-for-ceos

The report comes from the FBI's counter-terrorism wing, which (Klippenstein notes) is in the business of rooting out "pre-crime" – identifying people who haven't committed a crime and neutralizing them. As Klippenstein writes, Trump AG Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel have both vowed to treat anti-Tesla protests as acts of terror. That's the view from the top, but back on the front lines of the Connecticut fusion center, things are more reality-based:

[The public] may view the ensuing manhunt and subsequent arrest of Mangione as NYPD, and largely policing as a whole, as a tool that is willing to expend massive resources to protect the wealthy, while the average citizen is left to their own means for personal security.

Any good investor knows that anything that can't go on forever eventually stops. The only question is: will that halt is a controlled braking action, or a collision with reality's brick wall?

If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this post to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2025/03/27/use-your-mentality/#face-up-to-reality

Image: Lee Haywood (modified) https://www.flickr.com/photos/leehaywood/4659575229/

CC BY-SA 2.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/

[lullabyes22-blog]

Arcane S2 and its Critiques Therein..

There is a reason why I side-eye the 'arcane critical'-critical crowd who insist we cannot equate real world politics with fictional universes, or project our 'leftist' agenda on a world of pretend.

There seems this undercurrent of condescension in the attitude, as if it stems from people who have perhaps not considered why they enjoy the shows that they do, or how a certain character or plot makes them feel; either positively, by representation, or negatively, by erasure.

And yet... we are drawn to stories that resonate with our own experiences.

These stories, in turn, are written by writers who live in our world and who often pull their ideas directly from it. We gravitate toward characters who are reflections of ourselves, and avoid the stories which cause us discomfort for whatever reason. Even 'guilty pleasures' stem from an inner desire to explore themes or issues which we know exist (and may be problematic in social spaces) but which, through fantasy, become more bearable because we can safely distance ourselves from what is real.

Ultimately, most writers put something of themselves into their work. A little sliver of self always peeks through the cracks; a touch of idealism here, an emotion felt there, a comment on a political issue sprinkled somewhere in between.

It does not mean that fictional universes are a perfect mirror image of our reality; but it behooves us not to forget how influential 'RL' has been, and always will be, when writing fantasy or science fiction.

Tolkien was undoubtedly inspired by his experiences of war, all of which would later bleed into the pages of his Middle-Earth tales. Even in a tiny microcosm, I notice how life events and current political attitudes affect the way I write my stories, whether they are fan-based or original pieces.

We live in chaotic times. Fiction, at its crux, mirrors that chaos, because it comes about as a result of real life. As much as we wish to escape from harsh truths or present-day issues... they still seep through the veil between imagination and reality.

Escapism should not blind us to the truth that stories are products of our environment, and therefore, inevitably political.

With that in mind, there's something innately disingenuous about insisting that Arcane is somehow separate from real world issues - when, on so many levels, it borrows from real world problems and confronts its viewers with topics which are inherently political: poverty, inequality, state violence ... even the underbelly of the Piltover elite and their dealings with the undercity echoes how we see corruption occurring in governments worldwide.

That the show, by S2, reduces these issues to aesthetics - for instance, the writers admitting they wrote up Vi's backstory with her parents being killed by Enforcers to introduce an element of conflict into hers and Cait's future romance - or, worse, resolves these conflicts without any further nuance - like Sevika becoming a Zaunite representative on a Council that plainly disdains her, and the narrative coming away thinking this is acceptable in lieu of actual independence - is, in essence, disappointing for the themes that were promised.

It feels like the writers realized halfway through writing these plots, that they either did not have the time, budget, know-how or interest in delving too deep into these gritty, tough-to-solve sociopolitical pickles, and instead opted to pander to a (admittedly broad, myself included) subset of viewers who just wanted a sapphic couple with soft angst and sweet reconciliations to contrast all of the ugly machinations happening around them, while the rest of the cast was going through literal hell.

This is not enough to say we shouldn't enjoy Arcane for what it is. I've made plain, on several occasions, that I found the finale visually spectacular, thematically satisfying, and a masterpiece in terms of animation.

And yet, what elevated Arcane S1 to such high levels of acclaim was also its willingness to probe the uncomfortable issues surrounding power, control, exploitation, abuse, morality and free will; as well as, at least initially, its decision to offer a critical lens into how we approach each of these themes, as refracted to a cast of different characters.

We can acknowledge these strengths while simultaneously recognizing their flaws.

Arcane is far more than 'just a video game show.' It's a beautifully designed piece of fiction that deals with so many real-life issues, in spite of its fantasy setting. Yet the criticism that 'we cannot project real world politics onto it' feels inherently unfair - because no story ever exists in a vacuum, least of all one which confronts us with stark contrasts between poverty and wealth, oppression and liberation, authority and agency.

There is nothing wrong with simply wanting to sit back and enjoy the ride. But please spare me the holier-than-thou attitudes whenever people try and open up discourse on why certain shows should take responsibility when it comes to the messages they broadcast.

Because, believe it or not, there exists a slew of media that, in fact, sticks to the landing re: difficult questions about humanity, society and politics. Media that does not ignore, diminish or erase people who are struggling, precisely because those very same issues resonate in real life - and thus, have real consequences for real people.

It isn't asking much that audiences look past the veneer of aestheticism to find the beating heart within stories. Nor should we be belittled for wanting to hold writers to account if the world they create becomes nothing more than a pretty backdrop.

This can be done without hate-mongering, derision or critique; in fact, I'd go so far as saying that critique is a necessary aspect of engaging healthily with art, media and fiction.

At the end of the day, writers are responsible for the world-building of fictional universes and their plot choices; and both things do have an impact on those who watch those worlds come to life. That doesn't mean writers need to pander to every opinion out there; hell, playing to the gallery (and the shippers) rarely ends well, and more often than not detracts from the message of the tale.

But it does mean we can hold storytellers accountable for the impressions they leave behind, for better or worse - especially when said impressions further compound real world experiences of inequality, erasure or prejudice.

As consumers of media, let's be willing to dig beneath the surface to uncover the meanings of story. Let's not settle for anything less than writers who do everything possible to deliver compelling narratives that ask questions which reflect our humanity in meaningful, resonant ways. Let's enjoy our sweet sapphic ships and our goofy doomed sciencebros, while still looking closely at all of the other issues bubbling beneath the surface.

Let's keep up the healthy dialogues and stop dismissing criticism as merely spiteful.

Escapism is only truly fulfilling when, upon returning to the 'real world,' you feel that something has changed inside you; where you have been enriched, uplifted, inspired even... and sometimes, yes, educated.

Stories carry the weight of imagination; and we must allow ourselves to be transformed by wonder. But never forget to question the reality that is portrayed. Stories are born out of humanity, after all, and thus carry within them fragments of us. When we embrace fantasy, we also learn a lot about the way we see ourselves, and the kind of world we choose to live in.

And if all else fails, I guess we'll have fanfic to fall back on.

But that is another post, for another time.

<3

[apas-95]

Is there a story behind China's one child policy that makes it not as horrifying as western media claims?

The defining feature of China's development for the past 70 years has been the urban-rural divide. In order to develop a semi-feudal country with a very low industrial level into an industrialised, socialist nation, it was necessary to develop industrial centres. To 'organically' develop industrial centres would have taken many decades, if not centuries of continued impoverishment and starvation, so programs were put in place to accelerate the development of industry by preferentially supporting cities.

Programs like the 'urban-rural price scissors' placed price controls on agricultural products, which made food affordable for city-dwellers, at the direct expense of reducing the income of rural, agricultural areas. This hits on the heart of the issue - to preferentially develop industrial centres in order to support the rest of the country, the rest of the country must first take up the burden of supporting those centres. Either some get out of poverty *first*, or nobody gets out of poverty at all. The result being: a divide between urban and rural areas in their quality of life and prospects. In order to keep this system from falling apart, several other policies were needed to support it, such as the Hukou system, which controlled immigration within the country. The Hukou system differentiated between rural and urban residents, and restricted immigration to urban areas - because, given the urban-rural divide, everyone would rather just try to move to the cities, leaving the agricultural industry to collapse. The Hukou system (alongside being a piece in many other problems, like the 'one country two systems', etc) prevented this, and prevented the entire thing from collapsing. The 'one child policy' was another system supporting this mode of development. It applied principally to city-dwellers, to prevent the populations of cities expanding beyond the limited size the agricultural regions could support, and generally had no 'punishments' greater than a lack of government child-support, or even a fine, for those who still wanted additional children. Ethnic minorities, and rural residents, were granted additional children, with rural ethnic minorities getting double. It wasn't something anyone would love, but it served an important purpose.

I use the past-tense, here, because these systems have either already been phased out or are in the process of being phased out. The method of urban-rural price scissors as a method of development ran its course, and, ultimately, was exhausted - the negative aspects, of its underdevelopment of rural regions, began to overwhelm its positive aspects. So, it was replaced with the paradigm of 'Reform and Opening Up' around the 1980s. Urban-rural price scissors were removed (leading to protests by urban workers and intellectuals in the late '80s), and the Hukou system, along with the 'one child policy', were and are being slowly eased out as lessening inequality between the urban and rural areas make them unnecessary. Under the new system, the driver of development was no longer at the expense of rural regions, but was carried out through the internal market and external capital. The development paradigm of Reform and Opening Up worked to resolved some contradictions, in the form of the urban-rural divide, and created some of its own, in the form of internal wealth divisions within the cities. Through it, over 800 million people were lifted out of extreme poverty - almost all of them being in rural areas - and extreme poverty was completely abolished within China. 'Extreme poverty' can be a difficult thing for westerners to grasp, wherein poverty means not paying rent on time, but to illustrate - many of the last holdout regions of extreme poverty were originally guerrilla base areas, impassable regions of mountainside which were long hikes away from schools or hospitals, wherein entire villages were living in conditions not dissimilar to their feudal state a century before. These villages were, when possible, given infrastructure and a meaningful local industry accounting their environment and tradition (like growing a certain type of mountainous fruit), or entirely relocated to free government-built housing lower down the mountain that was theirs to own. These were the people the 'one child policy' was aiding, by reducing the urban population they had to support. Again, there were exemptions for rural and ethnic minority populations to the policy.

Even now, Reform and Opening Up is running its course. Its own negative aspects, such as urban wealth inequality, are beginning to overcome its positive aspects. So, the new paradigm is 'Common Prosperity', which will work to resolve the past system's contradictions, and surely introduce its own contradictions in the form of chafing against the national bourgeoisie, as it increases state control and ownership of industry, and furthers a reintroduced collectivisation. Organising a nation of well over a billion people is not simple. It is not done based on soundbytes and on picking apart policies in the abstract for how 'dystopian' they sound. It is an exceedingly complex and interconnected process based on a dialectical, material analysis of things; not a utopian, idealist one. What matters is this: those 800,000,000 people now freed from absolute poverty. The things necessary to achieve that were, unquestionably, good things - because they achieved that. They had their negative aspects, as does everything that exists, but they were unquestionably correct and progressive things.

[greenthestral]

Unleashing the Power of Goal 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth

In the pursuit of sustainable development, the United Nations introduced 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to address the most pressing global challenges. Among these goals, Goal 8 stands out as a key driver of social progress and economic prosperity. Goal 8 focuses on promoting decent work and sustainable economic growth, recognizing their critical role in reducing poverty, enhancing social inclusion, and fostering a more equitable society. This article explores the significance of Goal 8, its targets, and the transformative power it holds for individuals, communities, and nations worldwide.

Decent Work: Empowering Individuals and Strengthening Communities

Decent work, as the cornerstone of Goal 8, plays a vital role in shaping societies and driving sustainable development. It encompasses various dimensions, including productive employment, fair wages, and safe working conditions. By prioritizing decent work, societies can unlock numerous benefits that contribute to the overall well-being and prosperity of individuals and communities.

One of the key advantages of promoting decent work is its potential to reduce poverty. When individuals have access to productive employment opportunities, they can earn a sustainable income that allows them to meet their basic needs and improve their living standards. Decent work provides a pathway out of poverty by offering stable employment and fair wages, enabling individuals to break free from the vicious cycle of poverty and dependence on social assistance.

Moreover, decent work fosters social integration and inclusion. When individuals are gainfully employed, they have a sense of belonging and purpose within their communities. It promotes social cohesion by providing individuals with a platform to interact with others, develop relationships, and contribute to the overall fabric of society. Through decent work, individuals can build social networks, establish connections, and access various resources and opportunities that enhance their overall well-being.

Another crucial aspect of decent work is the promotion of enhanced well-being. Meaningful and fulfilling employment has a positive impact on individuals' mental and physical health. It instills a sense of purpose, self-esteem, and dignity, which are essential components of overall well-being. When individuals are engaged in decent work, they are more likely to experience job satisfaction, better mental health, and improved overall life satisfaction.

To achieve the goal of decent work, it is imperative to address prevalent issues such as unemployment, underemployment, and informality. Governments, in collaboration with businesses and organizations, play a crucial role in creating an enabling environment that promotes job creation, skills development, and entrepreneurship.

One effective strategy to promote decent work is through the implementation of policies that support small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). SMEs are often the backbone of economies, contributing significantly to employment generation and economic growth. By providing targeted support to SMEs, such as access to finance, technical assistance, and business development services, governments can foster entrepreneurship, create new job opportunities, and stimulate economic growth.

Investment in infrastructure is another critical component in achieving decent work. Infrastructure development, such as transportation networks, energy systems, and digital connectivity, not only enhances productivity but also creates employment opportunities. By investing in infrastructure, governments can create a multiplier effect on the economy, attracting investments, improving logistics, and connecting remote areas to markets and employment opportunities.

Furthermore, fostering an inclusive labor market is vital for promoting decent work. This involves eliminating discriminatory practices, ensuring equal opportunities for all individuals, and combating workplace inequalities. Governments can reinforce and strengthen labor laws that protect workers' rights, promote fair wages, and provide safe working conditions. Additionally, investing in education and skills development programs equips individuals with the necessary knowledge and competencies to secure decent employment and adapt to evolving labor market needs.

The promotion of decent work is crucial for achieving Goal 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth. By providing individuals with opportunities for productive employment, fair wages, and safe working conditions, societies can unlock a myriad of benefits, including poverty reduction, social integration, and enhanced well-being. Governments, in collaboration with businesses and organizations, have a pivotal role to play in creating an enabling environment that fosters job creation, skills development, and entrepreneurship. By addressing issues such as unemployment, underemployment, and informality, societies can build inclusive labor markets and ensure that individuals can contribute to economic growth, experience dignity in work, and improve their living standards.

Sustainable Economic Growth: Fostering Prosperity for All

Sustainable economic growth is a critical component of Goal 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth. It recognizes the importance of building resilient economies that can generate jobs, drive innovation, and provide equal opportunities for all individuals. Unlike traditional models of economic growth, sustainable economic growth emphasizes the need to balance economic progress with environmental sustainability and social equity.

Infrastructure development plays a crucial role in fostering sustainable economic growth. Investment in infrastructure, such as transportation, energy, and telecommunications systems, creates a foundation for economic activities and facilitates the movement of goods, services, and people. Well-planned and sustainable infrastructure projects not only create immediate job opportunities but also attract investments, spur economic activities, and enhance productivity in the long term.

Enhancing productivity is another key aspect of sustainable economic growth. Productivity gains lead to increased output, improved efficiency, and higher living standards. To achieve this, it is essential to invest in human capital development through education and training programs. By equipping individuals with the necessary skills and knowledge, they can contribute to the economy more effectively, adapt to technological advancements, and drive innovation.

Promoting inclusive and sustainable industrialization is crucial for sustainable economic growth. This involves encouraging responsible business practices that consider social and environmental factors. Businesses should embrace sustainable production and consumption patterns, prioritize resource efficiency, and adopt clean technologies. Inclusive industrialization ensures that economic growth benefits all segments of society by providing equal opportunities for individuals, particularly marginalized groups, and avoiding the concentration of wealth and resources in the hands of a few.

Access to financial services is vital for inclusive and sustainable economic growth. Financial inclusion enables individuals, including those from disadvantaged backgrounds, to access capital for entrepreneurial activities, invest in productive assets, and participate in economic activities. Governments and financial institutions can promote financial inclusion by developing innovative financial products, expanding access to banking services, and supporting microfinance initiatives.

Investments in education, research and development (R&D), and technology adoption are crucial for driving sustainable economic growth. Education equips individuals with the necessary skills and knowledge to adapt to evolving labor market needs and participate in innovative industries. R&D investments foster technological advancements, which drive productivity gains, promote innovation, and create new industries and job opportunities. Governments should provide incentives for businesses to invest in R&D, support collaboration between academia and industry, and facilitate technology transfer to ensure that economies remain competitive and resilient.

Sustainable economic growth also recognizes the importance of environmental sustainability. It emphasizes the need to minimize the negative impacts of economic activities on the environment and natural resources. This involves promoting sustainable consumption and production patterns, reducing carbon emissions, and preserving biodiversity. By integrating environmental considerations into economic decision-making, societies can achieve a more balanced and sustainable approach to growth that safeguards the planet for future generations.

Sustainable economic growth is a crucial component of Goal 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth. It emphasizes the need to build resilient economies that generate jobs, drive innovation, and provide equal opportunities for all individuals. To foster sustainable economic growth, nations must invest in infrastructure development, enhance productivity, and promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization. Additionally, investments in education, R&D, and technology adoption are vital for long-term productivity gains. By integrating environmental sustainability into economic activities, societies can achieve economic progress without compromising the environment or perpetuating social inequalities.

The Transformative Power of Goal 8

Goal 8's targets go beyond the immediate benefits of decent work and economic growth. They hold the potential to transform societies by breaking the cycle of poverty, reducing inequality, and promoting sustainable development. Here are some key areas where Goal 8 can make a significant impact:

Poverty Reduction: Decent work and sustainable economic growth are essential drivers of poverty reduction. By creating employment opportunities and ensuring fair wages, individuals can lift themselves out of poverty and improve their quality of life. Moreover, sustainable economic growth enables governments to allocate resources to social welfare programs, healthcare, and education, further supporting poverty eradication efforts.

Social Inclusion: Goal 8 emphasizes the need for inclusive societies, where everyone has equal access to decent work opportunities. By promoting gender equality, reducing discrimination, and ensuring equal pay for equal work, societies become more inclusive and diverse. This not only enhances social cohesion but also unleashes the untapped potential of individuals, contributing to more vibrant and innovative economies.

Reduced Inequalities: Sustainable economic growth, coupled with decent work opportunities, can help address inequalities within societies. By creating jobs in marginalized communities, empowering women, and promoting inclusive labor markets, Goal 8 aims to reduce income disparities and provide equal opportunities for all. This fosters a fairer society where individuals can thrive regardless of their background or circumstances.

Environmental Sustainability: Goal 8 recognizes the importance of sustainable practices in economic growth. It calls for sustainable consumption and production patterns, resource efficiency, and the adoption of clean technologies. By aligning economic activities with environmental objectives, societies can mitigate the negative impacts of economic growth, promote environmental stewardship, and safeguard the planet for future generations.

Conclusion

Goal 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth represents a pivotal milestone in the journey towards sustainable development. By promoting decent work opportunities and fostering sustainable economic growth, societies can unlock a host of benefits, including poverty reduction, social inclusion, and reduced inequalities. The transformative power of Goal 8 extends beyond economic indicators, encompassing social well-being, environmental sustainability, and the overall progress of nations. As we strive to build a more equitable and prosperous world, Goal 8 stands as a beacon of hope, guiding us towards a future where everyone can thrive and contribute to a sustainable global society.

[contentloadingandstuff]

Equals - Yae Miko x Kitsune!Male!Reader

A/N: Something experimental today. It's an idea I've been sitting on for quite a while now. If you want to, I'll make more. Enjoy. CW: Mentions of abuse and dubious consent, discrimination, societal misoginy (kitsune culture and stuff), objectification, sexism and the aftermath of life under these. For context - a female fox is called a 'vixen', and a male is called a 'dog'.

The era of Kitsune is long gone. 

Taking a stroll through modern Inazuma, one would never believe that there were once as many youkai as there were humans living on the islands. Tengu, Oni, Bake-Danuki and among them, the ascended foxes - Kitsune. As their demonic fellows, they too had an island to call their own, one that has now been swallowed by the sea for centuries. There, Kitsune created a nation of their own, their hearth, their home. Alongside with houses and streets, they quickly formed a culture that would echo for millennia, right until the fall. 

Many elements of it leaked to the general heritage of Inazuma - the festive masks are one such example, followed by the entirety of ritual practice carried out within the shrines scattered across the land. After all, it's the very reason why a kitsune traditionally stands at the helm of the Grand Narukami Shrine. The same is the case of fox warriors - never has history witnessed a dog lead units of his kin or other peoples to war, at least not one that isn't an exceptional, legendary character of some kind. The reason for this state of things is not easy to find as few cultural sources remain, but scholars did not give up on their research. They sought the input of Yae Miko, one of the only Kitsune remaining in Inazuma, who gave them a simple answer - males are very rare. Satisfied, they placed her answer in the books, and the discussion was closed. 

But Yae Miko, as is customary for the current Guuji, kept the truth for herself. In truth, she decided to conceal it because it's an aspect of her kind that she is anything but proud of, even if she never took part in it. What was ordinary for foxes in their nation's prime would be unacceptable even for humanity of that age. 

There happen to be two ways a Kitsune is created. Primarily, it's through the union of two ascended foxes - a kit conceived this way is immortal and sapient from the beginning, gaining the ability to transform in just a few years of life. Even with a single birth usually resulting in three to six newborn foxes, dogs are rare, with one being born in every fourth or fifth litter on average. The second way of creation doesn't favor them either - so far, there have only been a handful of wild dogs that lived long enough to become ascendants, further reducing the introduction of males into the population. Luckily, evolution had it that those rare men welcomed into the world were incredibly resilient to illnesses and injuries, even by Kitsune standards, letting them live and spread their genes for generations to come. With the proper approach, the Kitsune weren't in any way threatened with extinction. 

As is commonly observed by historians, culture reflects the nature of a species, and such is the case for Kitsune. Over the years, the female-dominated society came to a simple conclusion: males are rare and must be protected. This prime example of a logical takeaway soon led to another, less egalitarian idea - something human researchers would refer to as infirmatus sexus, observing such inequalities in some cultures of their own. Kitsune believed that males must be protected, yes, but thought of them as inferior in intelligence and overall wit, as they rarely ascended from the wild. The vixen majority had no issue with this idea and the society turned matriarchal, increasingly more restrictive towards the men. But it was justified, in their eyes - they were required to prolong the species, right? As time went by, so did the objectification of the male sex progress ever further. 

Before the fall, society was based around large family units - lines ruled over by the oldest vixen, referred to as the matriarch. Beneath her were others - first, her own daughters, followed by those of her predecessor, then their offspring and finally, at the lowest rung, the foxes that just stood up from four paws. Dogs were not subject to this hierarchy, as they were dispensed with as objects with a clear owner - usually the matriarch. She had the right to mate with him, and when a change of power came, so too did the patriarch - usually switched for a younger male from another family, the further, the better. Similarly, male kits stayed with their father (raised, of course, under the careful scrutiny of the vixens) until they were of breeding age to be pawned off to another lineage for political favor, land, rights or simply cold, hard currency. 

Dogs that were too old to produce offspring or simply infertile were disposed of, in ways more or less kind, depending on who happened to own them. The majority got to stay as authorities for the youth and priests, and those with no luck were sold to slavers or human poachers. 

You were born into one such lineage on the fringes of the nation. You still recall the drawings of your infant self - an adorable pup with a pristine but messy white coat, two little ears pointing out, greedily taking in the sounds of the world. Allegedly, you had four sisters, though you never seem to recall their names. The first memories of young Y/N were primarily centered around your father - a towering, muscular fox with a gleam of wit in his eyes and grey eating away at his own fur. Despite his young age and fitting appearance, you always saw him as wise and ancient - maybe because of the hair, darkened by stress and exhaustion. He was cynical at times, but loving nonetheless. One of the fondest memories you had was when he would lift a panel from the floor and let you run free in the forest outside. There were rules of course - don't let anyone see you and come back before the first rays of sun. You enjoyed your time of unsupervised play, chasing squirrels and exploring the woods, always coming back through the same crawl space before it dawned. Your father would wash all the dirt off and send you to sleep with a warm hug, asking you to keep quiet about your adventure. Of course, you nodded along, but being a kid created the inevitability of a slip up. After you mentioned it to your female playmate once, you were taken away from that house and never saw it again. 

You don't know what became of your father. You didn't even get to know his name. 

The new house was larger, and so were the girls inside. While you didn't like playing with vixens at home - there was always an adult watching and you would get relentlessly berated for injuring yourself even in the slightest - you at least had somebody to have fun with. There, you had nothing. Lady Matsui, your owner and wife-to-be, simply had you locked in a room with books and toys to get yourself busy in the few free moments you had. You hated it there, but any mention of it would get one of the toys you had taken away. Any sign of disobedience to your caretakers, especially during exercise or classes, would get you punished. Matsui didn't seem to have patience for you, and was constantly complaining; she wanted a husband with red fur, not white fur. You were simply a temporary solution, and by the end, you would have all her deepest fantasies memorised. You were never part of them - as she said, you shouldn't get too attached. You were to be replaced shortly, after all. At least the food was alright. 

Years went by and it was clear that Matsui would have to begrudgingly accept you as her permanent husband. She didn't take it lightly at first, but after a time of angry outbursts and drinking, she had a sudden change of heart. “If I'm to own you”, she said, “I should at least train you properly”. And trained you were, both physically and in mind. Your free time was reduced to null and your days became dedicated to working out and studying. Sometimes the two were mixed - you had to recite the rules while doing push-ups. Good boys always sleep at night. Good boys thank their mistress for food. Good boys always listen. Good boys never question what they are told. Then, you were served unsalted, nutritious foods. Raw vegetables, slightly cooked meat, plain rice and raw fish made up your diet - all natural, as your Lady wanted. All tasteless. Any fussing, talking back, crying, making mistakes or disobeying would quickly put you in the punishment room. She would slap a bamboo cane on your hands and butt until you were red, sore and bleeding, she would make you kneel on small rocks or sit up the wall for hours, sometimes she would whip you. “Military discipline”. All the while she constantly announced her displeasure with your existence.

No matter how muscular you were made to be, it was never enough. So your diet was changed, shrinking endlessly to meet her impossible standards. No matter if you were tall, it was always too short for Matsui. So you were made to hold on to a bar with rocks tied to your ankles to stretch you out. Your knees still hurt sometimes, the skeletal deformations made permanent by this regular exercise. No matter how much stamina you had, you always ended mating too early. So you were trained, day and night, forced to perform through pain, distress and exhaustion. Sometimes Matsui had balls or parties held at her estate, and you were the main entertainment. You would dance, sing and play any instruments they wanted, but your wife and her friends were never there for your artistic skills in the first place. Your cries, moans and screams were much finer. Now that you think about it, her friends were likely never allowed to mistreat the dogs of their houses, so they took out their frustrations and carried out their wildest fantasies on you - without consequences. They were smaller, they were lighter, they were physically weaker than you, and yet you couldn't defend yourself. It would only make things worse - far worse if you did. You felt filthy. You felt humiliated. Afterwards you cleaned yourself frantically, but the feeling of their hands on you never faded. 

You ended up rubbing so hard that your body bled. 

You became a reclusive, quiet fox. Saying anything more than what was expected of you usually ended up badly, so you decided it's better to just stay silent. Taking your punishments and abuse with silent resignation was the only way of survival - without entertaining whimpers and pleading, Matsui and her vixens quickly grew bored of you. Instead of releasing your pain in front of them, you resorted to crying silently in your room, screaming without making a sound in the moonlight. You did all the things every male did - trained, ate, rested, had sex, attended events as a decoration and primarily - mated. Unlike your father, you never had the chance to raise pups. The female kits were always under the care of the vixens, and you didn't have the luck to sire any sons - for which you were always berated and beaten by your owner, even when she was pregnant. To her, she said, you were useless. Worthless. Even as a breeder. Still, despite not being able to hold your children in your arms, you did your best to learn of them. Some of your caretakers were kind enough to let you know their number and names. You diligently noted these details on a piece of paper, writing the names you would give your daughters if you could. Naomi. Ai. Juri. Kana. These and many more were the only connection you had to your little ones. 

It was the only good thing you left behind when you got the chance to flee. 

Internal rivalry between daughters, sisters and mothers was commonplace, so much so that it sometimes evolved into internal wars - you made use of one. Matsui made quite the negative reputation for herself, not just by mistreating you, but by cheating other families. They were out for blood, and although they wanted to steal you away for themselves, Matsui’s heirs decided that you deserved a chance. Once the fighting broke out, they took you away, threw you on a small boat you had no idea how to pilot and kicked you out to sea. 

It was hardly pleasant at the moment, but you would always thank them for taking pity on you after you landed in Inazuma. In the human nation of thunder, everything felt foreign. It was a bigger island, with long stretches of empty fields between sparse human settlements. These smaller, mortal creatures were quite the nuisance to you - although you saw a few traders in your life, you never got to take a closer look. But, instinctually, you know that stumbling into the view of a human guard was a mistake. You ran away and tried to hide amongst the jagged cliffs near the island's largest mountains, but you had unknowingly walked right into the hands of another, pink haired vixen. 

Your arrival in Inazuma was noticed instantly. After all, humans haven't seen a fox other than Yae Miko for a few centuries now. When she initially heard the news, she couldn't believe it - definitely, it was just another poorly-observed monster, or a mere trick of the light. But she still wanted to confirm that rumor, and the moment she saw a white pair of ears amongst the usual crowds of Inazuma City, she had a single thought - to catch you. Snatch you right up in a net, for whatever silly, selfish reason, if only to touch you and ensure you were real. It wasn't a surprise for her that you panicked and hid as quickly as you showed up - you had reasons to believe your freedom would be unwelcome. Finding you was barely a challenge for her nose, and with the help of a few shrine maidens, you were captured and brought back to her residence. 

What an incredible sight, you were. Definitely one for very, very sore eyes - Miko has long since abandoned the hopes of finding a partner of her own species and having a litter, which definitely contributed to her cynicism and general exhaustion with life. But here you were, real and in the flesh. An actual dog. A handsome, muscular dog. Soon enough, however, Miko's initial excitement dwindled and the factual gravity of things reached her senses. In front of her, curled on the floor, was a dirty, underfed, terrified creature. For somebody that, in the post-cataclysm circumstances of human society she was born into, would shake every room he would enter, you were frightful and quiet. You needed proper care, so Miko announced you would be staying with her until further notice. She then rolled up her sleeves and got to work. 

There was no doubt that you could understand her, and speak by extension, but you were significantly suspicious of her. Surely, she would want to chain you down again, you thought. She might even be worse than Matsui for all you know. Each meal she offered could contain one of these strange powders they made you eat when you were misbehaving, putting you to sleep and letting her do Archons-know-what to you. So you pushed the bowl away, and her alongside it. You had to stay strong. 

—

She takes the handle into her hands and, as gently as she can, pushes it down. The room before her is bathed in darkness, but her eyes pierce through it without issue. The matches she left on the table are untouched. 

What a surprise, she muses. 

From the moment her foot stepped over the threshold, there has been a pair of eyes boring into her frame. Miko casts a discreet glance towards the bedside corner. The resting spot itself was stripped of everything besides the mattress, now placed into a cozy nest of blankets and pillows in the safest spot in the room, the point furthest away from the door. From there your E/C surveyed Miko's every move. A part of her couldn't hold a smile. The unfortunate circumstances aside, it was quite adorable. 

“Good evening.” Miko says, picking up a candle from the shelf. She puts the plate of food she brought on the table and lights it, illuminating the space with a warm, flickering light. Placing the candle close to herself, she looks directly your way. 

There is no response. Your eyes continue staring at her, unblinking. 

No luck just yet. But I clearly have his attention, at the very least. 

A sigh escapes her lips. Miko takes the plate and steps a bit closer to you. “You clearly don't trust me. I can assure you I mean you no harm, and that I won't do anything against your wish, but I bet you want to see for yourself. And while that is alright, I doubt you will get to, the way things are going now.” She crouches down, placing it on the wooden floor. “You must have been through a lot, but please, you need to eat. I don't know what you enjoy the most, so I feel like this is the right place to start.”

Again, you remain still. Up close, Miko can see the blank expression on your face, dirty with mud, sweat and dried blood. Miko rolls her eyes, but manages to silence the groan of frustration before it forms. By no stretch of the imagination was she the best person to take you in, but if not her, then who?

Do you want to be difficult? Fine then. Two can play at that game. 

“Alright then. Suit yourself - if you don't feel like helping yourself to this positively scrumptious meal, I will.” Miko takes the single pair of chopsticks she brought in her hands and lifts a piece of sushi from the plate up to her mouth. She hums ostensibly, enjoying the taste of cold-smoked salmon. 

Something moves in the darkness. Your ears are fully up and pointed her way, like radar dishes picking up every crunch and smack of her lips. The plump, snow white rice and the bright orange salmon exude a tempting smell, reminding you of just how hungry you are. If she eats it without problem, then you should be fine too…

You slowly creep forward, the blankets and pillows around you silently falling as you stretch your aching arms and legs. Miko pretends not to notice you, but in reality her ears tell her exactly what's going on. She observes as your hand emerges into the light, your eyes never leaving her figure. Her sharp eyes instantly notice how chewed your fingers are, with no white nail to see. You snatch the piece of food and sniff it. After making sure it's alright, you bite into it. The delightful taste of well-seasoned rice and real, fresh fish lights up your senses. 

You reach for another. And another. And another. Before long, Miko is pushed back in your priority list and you sit in front of her, wolfing down the food straight off the plate in her hands. The vixen smiles. 

Finally, you're eating. It might not be much, but it's a start. You are just like a stray cat, aren't you? Scared, neglected and mistreated. Afraid of every shadow. 

She delights in watching your ears tremble under the speed of your eating. 

Such a cute creature. Who would ever want to hurt you? Certainly not me. Miko tilts her head. I wonder if I can…

“Thank you for the meal.”

Your sudden words make her pause. She never once doubted you could speak, but at the same time she didn't expect you to open up at something as simple as food. It was important nonetheless - if you spoke once, it would be just a matter of time before you speak again. And then she could learn everything about you. Who you are, what you like, and most importantly, who hurt you. 

“Do not mention it, little one.” She slowly stretches out her hand towards you. “May I?”

You stop eating for a second before bringing your nose closer to her hand. It smells like salmon. You return your attention to the delicious sushi on the plate. 

With a hum of satisfaction, she places her hand between your ears. They fold to the sides, making way for her. Miko rubs her hand over your grimy, brownish fur. It was white once, for sure, but now that colour is just barely showing in places. No worries - she would wash you and make sure your coat will return to its undoubtedly splendid layer. 

“I'm here. It will be alright.”

There's a long road ahead of us. But you won't have to walk it alone, dear. 

Thanks for reading!

[genderkoolaid]

HIV research and monitoring has historically excluded transgender men, creating blind spots in understanding this group’s sexual well-being and happiness. Two recent studies—one out of New York and the other from Germany—suggest that transgender men who have sex with other men have a higher prevalence of HIV than the general population. The German analysis further finds that transgender men who have sex with other men face a host of inequities compared to cisgender gay and bisexual men, including reduced access to sexual healthcare and less satisfying sex lives. [...] Almost three quarters of trans MSM reported their income was insufficient for them to live comfortably, compared to about half of cis MSM. The researchers note that the income disparity could be due to the trans MSM participants being younger on average, but they also suggest discrimination could play a role. In terms of mental health, survey scores indicated both groups experienced various degrees of depression and anxiety from mild to severe. However, trans MSM were almost four times as likely to suffer from severe anxiety and depression compared to cis MSM (15% vs 5%). Furthermore, trans MSM indicated far more suicidal ideation than their cisgender counterparts (41% versus 16%). The survey results also pointed to gaps in sexual satisfaction, with more trans MSM being unhappy with their sex life than cis MSM (34% versus 22%). Trans men more often disagreed that sex was as safe as they wanted (18% versus 11%) and indicated less ability to say no to unwanted sex (23% to 12%). Trans MSM reported fewer sexual partners than cis MSM, and the study authors propose that difficulties in finding partners due to stigma may contribute to less happiness in their sex lives. On the whole, trans MSM also had poorer access to healthcare compared to cis MSM. Fewer had ever received either an HIV test (41% versus 24%) or an STI test (55% versus 45%). Drawing on other research, the authors suggest that one reason for this may be discrimination in healthcare settings, which may cause trans men to avoid seeking sexual health services. The authors go on to say that stereotypes, such as assuming trans men only have sex with cisgender women, may also interfere with providing adequate care. Finally, although trans MSM had higher rates of HIV than the general population, this was lower than amongst cis MSM (2.5% versus 10.7%). A different study conducted in New York City by Dr Asa Radix and colleagues of the Callen-Lorde Community Health Center also found that HIV prevalence is higher in transgender men. In this retrospective analysis, the authors identified a racially diverse group of 577 transgender men who sought care at the facility between 2009 and 2010. Among this group of men (mean age 32 years), less than half (n=250) had ever had an HIV test. Out of the 250 individuals who had, 2.8% (n=7) tested positive for HIV, a significantly higher rate of HIV than the current US national prevalence of 0.41%. Of the 18 trans men who had sex exclusively with cis men and tested for HIV, two (11.1%) were positive.