#anti theories

[toomanyfandomstohandlr]

Right okay, I can't believe I'm writing this but here we are;

Hello JSE Community, guess who's back and just watched the stream and is now highly confused of who on earth Echo is--

I mean, a lot happened in the stream and its all playing in my mind, but Echo feels like something that I should know that I'm just not grasping at? Like, I was confused when Chase was talking to them and he said Echo because we've never heard of them before. But then that got me thinking;

The solution to the puzzle was Magiccircle, right? Which instantly makes me think of Marvin. Now please feel free to correct me in any of this because I won't lie, I have been out of the Ego loop for some time and I feel like I have to catch up on the videos because I cannot remember for the life of me whats actually happened to the other Egos (I think that Anti killed/took over them all but where I got this information, I don't remember if it was in a video, mentioned or if I've just made it up in my mind) HOWEVER I do feel like at that point in time, Anti had been there to "glitch talk" to Chase, but I think something took over that "signal" and that something was Echo! Do I think it was Marvin, who Anti could have possible "killed" and took over his body? Maybe! I'm not sure, the Magic Circle does make me think of him, although it could just be a cool little easter egg, like "look heres a Marvin reference!" Kind of puzzle!

But then that begs the question of, if it might not be Marvin, who could it be? Well, I have no idea, I have a couple of theories, but I might be delving to far into them! But something that made me think about Echo is to search the meaning. Now, now, I know we know that an echo is just the imitation of a sound being bounced back, BUT hear me out, because when I did search this up, I was actually surprised!

So here is the screenshot I took, and something stuck out to me: "to be reminisce of" and i know, I know, this is probably where I'm looking far too deep into this whole thing because Echo could just be a new Egos name that we haven't met! But at the same time, I feel like this could be someone we've already met, someone who may have been in the same position as Chase! Being haunted by Anti, hearing voices, noises! And perhaps the reason Echo can't help Chase escape or isn't willing to is because they've already been taken over by Anti. They're an echo of who they once were. Anti may have absorbed them (or maybe everyone who dies, dies for good, we haven't really seen Jack make another appearance after Anti killed him in 2016) but maybe there's still something inside, fighting against Anti, trying to help Brody, but only as an Echo.

Could be Marvin? Again, maybe, or it could just be a new Ego, who knows?

[glitchyartist]

Mm

Small thought

What if Anti didn't show up on cameras unless he was actually inside the camera itself. Like he walks in front of a security camera, but he doesn't show up on the feed because of what he's made of or some shit. When he shows up in videos, he's either possessing someone or manipulating the video from inside the camera, hence the glitching.

[puppet-master-anti]

So is chase just gonna be Anti here? I feel like he might be, or maybe he has split personality and doesn’t know it? Because a lot of people black out when they have split personality and the alter can spend as much time in their body as they want. Maybe this is kinda like the movie split where chase is the primary person but he has so many different alters that he switches between he can’t remember it all. Anti has said ‘WE’ on multiple occasions, if Chase does indeed have split personality it would make since as to why anti says we all the time. Of course anti would be annoyed, he’s having to share his mind with all different types of idiots 🤣

[getawayheaven]

https://hazishisrose.tumblr.com/post/701983780350590976/seriously-this-is-actually-so-boring-and

I seriously don't understand how the mind of antis work. They just don't want to see the reality that's right in front of them. I have been following your whole conversation with both @anticonspiracist and @back-to-louis and they both have no fucking idea what the hell they are even talking about. They don't even follow the things that happen in the fandom on daily basis yet they claim that everything is just conspiracy, they say that they don't want to get themselves involved with larries yet they are Obsessed with larries and they continue to stalk us. This is just sick. Like lifetime contracts do not exist?? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Even a kid must know this. These people are totally brainless.

These people are just feeding their own minds by creating a perfect world in their heads where nothing is wrong, everyone is a good human, celebs live highly authentic lives where they do not lie AT ALL, everything we see is pure and real and hence NO ONE should question anything. Because NOTHING IS WRONG.

They do not want to see the reality at all. And they want everyone to turn blind eye towards everything. You are right they have no idea what goes on in the fandom on daily basis, hence they are not aware of the pattern we have seen since years yet they are obsessed with larries, creating huge masterpost about larries, archiving and stalking larry blogs, hell even creating big podcast episode about larries. I was shocked that the one who claims to be ANTI CONSPIRACIST talks about larries and their theories on podcast like we are some lab mice that needs to be experimented and researched on and they are some scientist and researchers creating scientific principles. LMAO.

Their brains are so full of larries that they can't see past their own pre determined beliefs. They have build such hatred towards a spicific group of people that they refuse to see reality even when it is presented in front of them. And if they sense danger or any kind of threat for their perfect little bubble then they shut themselves down in their shells. For example @back-to-louis was continuously replying me till they had something to prove themselves right but as soon as they realised that they were actually wrong here they blocked me 💀. These antis prove that Larries have been right since the start.

[khruschevshoe]

There is a conversation to be had about the fact that Taylor Swift's album is being played in its entirety across all of iHeartRadio's 868 stations, pushing out the opportunities other artists might have had to get radioplay. That's the literal definition of a monopoly. No wonder she'll hit the top of the radio play charts with this maneuver, because at least 65 minutes (if not the back side of the album, which would take it to nearly twice that length) across EIGHT HUNDRED AND SIXTY EIGHT STATIONS will be dedicated to her, artificially boosting her radio play and decreasing everyone else's. In this essay I will—

[creature-wizard]

Reminder that the lizard alien conspiracy theory is antisemitism

"They drink blood/adrenochrome/feed on fear" - repackaged blood libel.

"They're manipulating the economy and starting needless wars" - repackaged Jewish banker conspiracy theory.

"The reptilian aliens control the media" - repackaged "Jews control the media" conspiracy theory.

"Judaism was created by reptilian aliens in Babylon" - demonizing Judaism by claiming it was created by malevolent aliens.

"Reptilian aliens are creating fake 'vaccines' to harm/control us" - repackaged conspiracy theories about Jews creating dangerous vaccines.

"We're not inciting violence against everyday Jews, we just want to share the truth" - still trying to convert Jews to something else, which itself is antisemitism.

[egophiliac]

Hi it's just to let you know that the official romanization of Revaan's name is Raverne ! Also they have romanized Baul's name to Baur !

Twst coming back at us again with the least expected romanization! thank you everybody (oh god my inbox) (no it's great, I literally asked for this and the reactions have been INCREDIBLE, thank you all!)

I do like Raverne though, I think it's got a nice fancy sound to it! (I had kinda suspected it was going to be an R instead of an L, so the fact that it's SO close to Laverne except for that is hilarious to me personally.) and Dragoneye Duke is honestly probably the best translation for his title, I wasn't envying the localizers that one. :') Baur instead of Baul I was NOT expecting, but in retrospect I think his name's supposed to be a reference to the Bauru crocodile, so that actually makes way more sense!

someone else also said Meleanor has become Maleanor, which is the REALLY weird one to me, because I was so surprised it was written as Mel instead of Mal in the first place?! oh god no I can't decide which one I like better. 😭 (I wonder if they might change it to Mal...they have made romanization changes before) (like I remember House of Distraction being corrected to House of Destruction in Playful Land) (I did check and she's still Mel for now, but I dunno, they might Mal her up and some point and save me from having to make a decision about which one to use) (HECK I CAN'T DECIDE)

uhhhh thank you for letting me ramble about anime names, let's just say MONOGRAMMED SWEATERS FOR EVERYONE

[thefiresofpompeii]

> new series release (space babies) coincided with the uk seeing the northern lights for the first time in years

> the devil’s chord coincided with paul mccartney’s long-missing hofner bass guitar being found, by a doctor who fan no less

> boom coincided with an actual meteor crash

> 73 yards is coinciding with a rise in bizarre supposedly-occult animal sacrifice rituals in britain (the folk horror part) and rishi sunak finally calling a general election (the political drama part)

> hypothesis: russell t davies has somehow managed to tune in to the universe’s divine frequency ??

> conclusion: messing with the forces of fate, cause&effect and coincidence, even if it’s for the pop culture franchise you’re showrunning, actually turns it into an egregore, but only if it’s been going for long enough (sixty fucking years to the dot) and watched by enough people (tens of millions). which it has

> ergo, postscriptum: television magick is real and is being unintentionally performed by the creators + audience of the world’s silliest science fiction show

> /jk. unless?

[genderkoolaid]

tbh my opinion isnt so much that trans men cannot have male privilege. its that the way we understand male privilege is based in cis women, specifically otherwise privileged (esp. otherwise-gendered privilege, i.e gender-conforming/straight/perisex) cis women's understanding of gender as something static and inherent to who you are, rather than something fluid which is, in part, constructed by society and placed onto you separately in every moment.

can a trans man experience (cis) male privilege? yes. can a trans woman? yes. and so can a cis woman! hell, a femme perisex cis woman with a gender neutral name could if she's assumed to be a cis man on a resume. male privilege is not an on/off switch. the idea that it is stems from cissexist understandings of male/female as entirely separate and static categories which everyone can and must be understood through. trans people in feminism are expected to constantly defend and deflect accusations of being Privileged Male Oppressors by promising cis perisex women that our experiences are just like theirs! we don't have any scary opinions that don't align with their worldview! we swear we won't ever make them have to reflect on how being cis+perisex has biased them and potentially made their analysis of gender at all inaccurate! trans experiences are only considered valuable to cisfeminism to the extent that they reaffirm what cisfeminists already hold true. thats why they only ever want to talk about a very simplistic narrative around wages pre/post-transition. its extremely unthreatening to cis people because it presents transness in patriarchy as just going from one cis role to another; it doesn't ask cis feminists to expand their paradigm to include the ways in which trans people are treated as a class and their own complicity in transphobic oppression.

which is why trans men have been getting fucked over by trans-affirmng cisfeminism. because by virtue of having our gender acknowledged, we are expected to forfeit our place in the feminist movement and adopt the role of outsider along cis men*. and its also why trans women and MTX people get fucked over the minute they cannot or refuse to describe their experiences through the one or two approved narratives. cisfeminism cannot tolerate transness-as-transness. it has to be compressed and reduced and diluted into something that fits within a cis-centric framework. we aren't allowed to have nuanced and intersectional conversations about trans men & other trans folks relationship with male privilege, the things we have to sacrifice to there, how fleeting it can be, the fact that for some of us being read as "biologically male" is actively more dangerous than being read as female... if it isn't familiar to cis women, then it means you aren't really oppressed.

*cis men should not be outsiders in feminism either btw but thats another post

[tr1ppykay]

the more i participate in discussions of transmasculine issues, the more disgusted i become at the approach a lot of "trans inclusive" feminists have towards transmascs...

feminist theory exists to serve the real life people that are harmed by patriarchy. if theory is not sufficiently serving real human beings who are desperately looking for acknowledgment of their suffering, then it must be rewritten to make room for that acknowledgment. if transmasculine people are all telling you about discrimination they have experienced, and how feminist theory does not make room to talk about their unique relationship with gender based oppression, you modify the theory to make room. you don't bash them over the head with writing that doesn't account for their existence.

feminism is not a fundamentalist religion. it is a conversation that must account for new perspectives and evolve to encompass them if we want to make any progress. but many feminists who discount transmasculine experiences want to treat the current state of feminist theory as a bible of unwavering truth: if men who face gendered oppression aren't mentioned, then trans men must be wrong about their lived experiences. of course, your precious theory could never have blind spots!

[glfry]

Can we agree that the "Thats two things" line from Mike was autistic as shit

[lilithism1848]

[puppet-master-anti]

Oh chase! We didn’t forget about you, sweet boy. We love you 🥰 you maybe just need a therapist hon. I don’t think he counts as a therapist… maybe try dr Schneep, maybe he can… I just wanna hug you Chase! Everything is gonna be fine, honey, you won’t have to worry about that glitch bitch for much longer.

The fact that he was in the woods then wasn’t… is Chase learning magic? Is Chase a descendant of Marvin? Or maybe Marvin sent him somewhere to keep him safe. 👀

[edenfenixblogs]

How do you know if you’re antisemitic?

Well, if a Jew telling you you’re antisemitic won’t make you believe it, here is a guide to help you figure it out yourself.

1. Do you think Jews, en masse, are ACTIVELY REPLACING/ATTEMPTING TO REPLACE some other group — especially a somehow more deserving group? (For example, White people, Black people, African people, Palestinians, Arabs, Muslims, indigenous people, etc.) Do you feel there are JUST TOO MANY JEWS IN A GIVEN LOCATION?

2. Do you think Jews are PRETENDING TO BE SOMETHING THAT THEY ARE NOT? (For example, White, PoC, “Real” Jews, Indigenous/Native, an Ethnic Minority, Devoted Citizens of [YOUR COUNTRY] etc.)?

3. Do you think Jews are CONTROLLING OR ATTEMPTING TO CONTROL SOME INTEGRAL ASPECT OF SOCIETY? (For example, the government, media, banks, business, medicine, etc.)

4. Do you think Jews that you criticize are UNIQUELY BLOODTHIRSTY OR GENOCIDAL — especially when hoping for personal achievement or cultural supremacy? (For example, trying to stage a global war so they can control the world; using/consuming blood of Christians and babies to do satanic rituals; sexually seducing non-Jews in order to contaminate bloodlines and erase other pre-existing identities; immigrating to a new location with the intention of murdering those who already exist there; desiring to murder Arabs, Muslims, or Palestinians in their homelands by means of genocide in order to control a region at the exclusion of other ethnicities, etc.)

5. Do you think Jews are APPROPRIATING A PRIVILEGE THAT THEY DO NOT DESERVE AND THAT DOES NOT BELONG TO THEM? (For example, freedom, wealth, power, whiteness, G-d’s favor, a safe home in the Levant, Arab land, colonial power, representation as a minority group, etc.)

6. Do you think Jews at large or the specific Jews you disagree with and who wield power in a way you disapprove of CAN BE COLLECTIVELY LABELED? (For example, might you call them slaves, vermin, insects, dirty, scheming, communists, fascists, Nazis, satanic, Zionists, scum, etc.)

IF YOU ANSWERED YES TO ANY OF THESE QUESTIONS YOU ARE AN ANTISEMITE. This is literally textbook antisemitism. If you answered, well yeah but only “the Jews in Israel” or “the ones who vote for Bibi” or the “ones who moved to my town/country/region” or if you saw something on one of the lists and think “well no fair! That one is actually true,” your exception isn’t exceptional. You haven’t found the one true bad thing that Jews ACTUALLY are. It’s not some conspiratorial propaganda to equate reasonable beliefs with hate. You’re just hateful. Some part of you hates Jews. And you have to confront what that part of you is and you have to destroy it if you want to engage in any conversations that impact Jewish welfare anywhere in the world.

One way to start deconstructing is to ask yourself “Why do I feel this way?” “From whom did I learn to think this way?” “Who in my life approves and supports me thinking this way?” “Am I comfortable telling a Jewish person I feel this way in person?” “How do I think a Jewish person will feel/What do I think a Jewish person will think if I tell them this?” “Do I care what they feel or think? Why or why not?” “How would I feel/what would I think if someone felt this way or thought this way about me or an identity I value deeply?”

[intersexcat-tboy]

Maybe it's being intersex maybe it's being trans but I think the "force feminize our femboys, real femboys take e" jokes are all absolutely disgusting. I understand it's a joke about trans women eggs but it does not rinse the rancid taste from my mouth.

I was forced against my will to be feminized. I was traumatized, watching each day my body further betray me. Trans femboys exist. There shouldn't be barely ironic jokes about forcing or pressuring people into transitioning. Not in the sense of "one trans person represents all of us to bigots" but in the "we are fucking trans and should understand being against forcing someone into a gender. It's not funny just because you have the power" way

[crumblinggothicarchitecture]

It's Bothering me so much that Taylor Swift is so fake smart-girl coded, I need to say this:

I have a degree in both Philosophy and English Literature....

She used the term Soliloquy wrong in her song by using it to refer to people espousing nonsense while complaining in an echo-chamber about her.

Instead, a soliloquy is the most honest and introspective a character will ever be. Often the character will stand to the front center of the stage and, as if in a dream, speak openly to themselves (and in respect to the audience) lay out the truth, or the agony of whichever conflict haunts the plot. So, anyway she's just plain wrong in her usage of the term.

I am not giving a sanctimonious soliloquy. Miss Taylor Swift, you are wrong, and I am speaking honestly.

She finishes the lyric "sanctimoniously performing soliloquies I'll never see" and I just want to mention that a soliloquy requires an audience... so she does not know what she is talking about by saying that there is no audience for a soliloquy.

Also, for the record, I don't think Taylor Swift knows anything of substance about Aristotle. I, on the other hand, took a three-hour long oral exam over Aristotle's life work while out-of-my-mind-high on Dayquil and pain meds after a surgery. I got an "A", and, somehow, I lived through that, I doubt the validity of Swift's claims to know anything at all about philosophy. Especially, considering how all her songs are about as deep as a puddle.

She's completely lost her credibility.

The woman did not even finish High School in a traditional, well-rounded way. I think she read a handful of Joe's books and now thinks real highly of herself.

Edit: I don't mean to make fun of her for being dumb. I'm frustrated that she's "stepping on my lawn" and making her legion of fans think that she totally knows what she's talking about when it comes to literary references in her work or philosophy. It's obvious that she does not actually understand the concepts she attempts to engage with.

Her only real literary skill is name dropping actually talented writers or philosophers in her songs.

Edit 2: Since some people want to come on this post and tell me that I am being needlessly pedantic about her use of words. Go away. A soliloquy is an ancient literary form, one which transcends cultures and centuries, and I, as a scholar of English Literature, am in the position to say that Swift is speaking about the form incorrectly. She obviously did not even google the form, it's clear she has very little real acquaintance with half the literature concept or authors she names drops.

Sure, soliloquies can be unreliable (Hamlet's "To Be, or not to be" is the most obvious example). However, the fact of the matter is that soliloquy hinges on the Honesty of the character. Swift writing that it's actually the opposite of honesty proves to me that she has no real idea about the literary form.