It’s a shame you’re not interested in Winnie the Pooh: Blood and Honey, cause I wanted to see you write Winnie, Piglet, Tigger and Owl gang///bang///ing the reader.
Accept these headcanons about them I have concocted that might make zero sense and/or be completely out of character. Idk. I support people wanting smut for weirdass characters. Does this count as yiff? 🤔
Winnie: Initiates gang bang, even roughly pawing at your cl!t to make sure you’re wet enough for bearbacking. Falls asleep pretty much immediately afterwards, no aftercare. Probably grunts the most and is generally louder than the others.
Piglet: Likes getting little kissies on his face. Then gets impatient when his tusks get in the way of mouth kisses, so he just shoves his meat thermometer down your throat while Winnie—I’m not calling him Pooh, that’s too cute for a slasher—makes sure you’re slick enough.
Tigger: If you try getting off your hands and knees while getting spit toasted by Winnie and Piglet, Tigger will bite your nape to keep you in place. Might just paint your back with stripes, so to speak, if you don’t have a hole free. If Piglet finishes first, he’ll wait until your pussy’s available.
Owl: Also not bothered by sloppy seconds. Can he fly? I’d imagine he’d grasp your ankles with his talons and take you up into a tree. Because he has wings for arms, you’ll have to spread your own legs and use them to hold onto a branch while being pile driven.
It’s a low branch. At this point fluids are probably dripping down you and if the others haven’t finished, or want to go again, your mouth is still available. And your tits.
Hopefully their blood rushes out of their dicks, before your blood rushes to your head.
28 notes
·
View notes
THE AARONS 2023 - Worst Film
It’s a marvel this category isn’t filled up with superhero films after the year they’ve had. Here are The Aarons for Worst Film:
#10. 65
A Quiet Place screenwriters Scott Beck and Bryan Woods don’t knock it out of the (Jurassic) park with their subsequent Spielberg homage. 65 will have viewers counting down the seconds until they can go home. The science-fiction tale strands stars Adam Driver and Ariana Greenblatt in a B-movie bereft of a reason to see it. The fusion of futuristic tech and ferocious animals should have been easy fodder for frivolous entertainment. Instead, the sluggish pace of the film’s imminent extinction event suggests it wasn’t a meteor or da ice age that killed the dinosaurs; it was extreme boredom.
#9. Rebel Moon - Part One: A Child of Fire
Director Zack Snyder likes to paint himself as a rebel against a restrictive studio system while being constantly given new opportunities without cause. His latest big-budget misfire is a childish mash-up of Star Wars and Seven Samurai. Par for the course, the prosaic director copies his inspirations while completely misunderstanding their objectives. Already, the film’s awkward and abruptly-ended parade of thinly-sketched characters is being billed as another incomplete vision, requiring not just two parts but two cuts of each part to truly fulfill Snyder’s intentions. Maybe his hardcore fans will be pleased at the end of the prolonged journey; everyone else will be over the Moon long before then.
#8. The Exorcist: Believer
From the beginning, the involvement of David Gordon Green inspired little faith in Believer. Sure enough, the director of Halloween kills interest in his proposed trilogy one film sooner than his last. It’s unclear what exactly led the studio to release a sequel fifty years later that’s tamer than a TV edit of the original. It surely couldn’t have been the return of Ellen Burstyn in her Oscar-nominated role of Chris MacNeil given how quickly the film disfigures and discards the character. That said, it may be for the best that she could excise herself from the proceedings before its embarrassing ending. The franchise is no stranger to desecration but, even at its worst, it was never before this uncompelling.
#7. Five Nights At Freddy’s
Topping the box-office may have demonstrated audiences’ appetite for the haunted pizzeria franchise but, make no mistake, the film adaptation of Freddy’s is as run-down as its central establishment. The animatronic mascots at center stage only manage the most pedestrian of jump-scares; they’re far from the only ones just going through the motions. The script, written in part by franchise creator Scott Cawthon, stretches out its thin premise with banal characters and a bizarre child-custody B-plot. It might have been entertaining if it had been any more cheesy. Instead, Freddy’s only serves up an interminable runtime; five nights has never felt so long.
#6. Hypnotic
Hypnotic is aptly named; the thriller from Spy Kids director Robert Rodriguez certainly commands one’s attention. The plot, which revolves around Ben Affleck sleepwalking through a conspiracy involving dueling factions of psychics, is simply too inane to ignore. Rodriguez wrote his initial script back in 2002 but was clearly susceptible to outside influences; the film rips off several works that were released before and since, including the dream-like architecture of Inception. Although the director may pride himself on his low-budget prowess, even he can’t make those knock-off sequences look good (though they’re not the silliest instance of replicating elaborate scenery on a miniscule budget here). The film fulfills its intentions on one front: once it’s all over, audiences will have a hard time believing any of it was real.
#5. Children of the Corn
The latest offspring of the rotten franchise at least had a kernel of a good idea: the remake roots its characters’ motivations in righteous fury at environmental recklessness rather than strictly religious fervor. However, Children never develops this into any kind of sustenance. The horror here is as, ahem, corny as can be, particularly its stale translation of demonic entity He Who Walks Behind the Rows. Director Kurt Wimmer shows no growth as a director since his last film in 2006, the infamous Ultraviolet; the wooden child actors at least have their youth as an excuse. Sadly though, if ranked within the rest of the series, this one would still land in the middle of the row.
#4. Haunted Mansion
2023 was home to many failures for The Walt Disney Company, but none quite as ghastly as the new Haunted Mansion. It’s baffling how a film this overstuffed with actors (including Rosario Dawson, Owen Wilson, and Danny DeVito among many others) could end up this vacant. Indeed, the biggest throughline of the theme-park adaptation is not its attempted reflection on grief but its pervasive and perverse product placement (One character’s tearful monologue about his dead wife comes complete with a prominent Baskin Robbins namedrop). It’s definitely haunting, just not in the way they hoped for.
#3. My Big Fat Greek Wedding 3
The Big Fat franchise became even more bloated last year with a picture that can most charitably be described as ‘an all-expenses paid trip to Greece for its cast’. There’s certainly no storytelling reason why audiences are still following the adventures of this extended family, which haphazardly include a last-minute wedding of two very minor characters to justify its title. Nia Vardalos finally receives the director’s chair in addition to her regular writing work just in time for there to be no fresh direction to take things in. If she tries to reunite everyone for a fourth go-round, they would be wise to divorce themselves from it as quickly as possible.
#2. Pet Sematary: Bloodlines
Bloodlines resurrects the series last seen in 2019; if this was how it was going to come back, it should have stayed buried. While Stephen King is an imaginative writer, trying to stretch a single chapter of any novel into a feature-length film is like getting blood from a stone. The zombie prequel stumbles its way from scene to scene in search of life, but Bloodlines has nothing for audiences to relate to. Even screen icons like David Duchovny and Pam Grier can’t rouse any interest. Exploiting known franchises may be easy, but, sometimes, making anything else instead is better.
AND THE WORST FILM OF 2023 IS…
#1. Winnie the Pooh: Blood and Honey
Disney slowly losing their stranglehold on intellectual property is a bit bittersweet; Honey is bad enough to sour anyone on the idea of a public domain. The shoddy slasher film, which blustered its way onto the marketplace as soon as the filmmakers could profit from it, is barely recognizable as Pooh but unmistakable as crap. Making the lovable animal into a feral murderer may be legal now, but writer/director Rhys Frake-Waterfield didn’t think, think, think up any other ideas beyond just stirring the pot. Winnie is hoping to prey on one’s curiosity with its premise alone. Word of advice? Don’t bother.
NEXT UP: THE 2023 AARON FOR BEST DIRECTOR!
3 notes
·
View notes
So, I watched the new Winnie the Pooh: Blood and Honey (2023) film and uh… that was an experience which, and I say this as an insult, exceeded my expectations. I knew it would be bad before I watched it, but I didn’t think it’d somehow be more shitty and less shitty, at the same time, than I thought.
4 notes
·
View notes