So maybe I am wrong but I don't think you can gendered Louis & Armand, the way you do Loustat.
Because neither Louis nor Armand are really the "housewife" in the situation. In Dubai and SF is Louis' initiative and therefore his business but Armand does have an equal role on it, tho Louis is the more capitalist/investment savy, Armand is like the one to schedule talks with buyers, help fix the houses etc. It is not Armand's home, like Louis moving into Lestat's, is THEIR home, both in Dubai and SF.
And like even if the bullshit with the books (which tf) and the tree are definitely Armand, the art, the furniture even the gray are Louis' (cause he's grieving). Like for me the Dubai penthouse is like a reflection of Louis' self/soul "You are in my coffin" as much as a manifestation of Armand controlling tendencies.
I saw a post about exactly this, like how Armand & Louis relationship is a Depiction of how even in the queerest of models and types of relationships abuse can still take part if people are not willing to question the systems, dynamics or just plane different levels of power their members have.
And then we have the D/S dynamic. Kink and BDSM are already shamed upon in our heteronormative society, because they play with the power dynamics that already exist in the relationship, and they create a separte extructure through safe-words and after care and good old communication in which both member can consent to those dynamics, be safe and most important GET PLEASURE from them.
And like, Armand as the powerfull abusive partner Technically, considering our heteropatriarchal lense should be dominant, but he gladly relinquished it to Louis. Which is a role we don't expect from the patriarch of the house.
Plus all of Louis' boys, means he has a sexual freedom that is not allowed to the "housewife". Though, of course that extend of freedom is still determine/manage by Armand, but not in the sense of Louis is sexually his, ergo he can't be with x. But rather Louis might get Hurt, so I need to control him, for his sake.
Which is why Armands abuse looks more to me like care-taker abuse than like the heteropatriarcal shit Lestat does.
Which I think, is also because Armand being a racialized man with a learned helplessness ingrained to him, really can't like inhabit the same role Lestat does in a home. He will always be a step down, cause masculinity and male privilege gets further away (or like changes? I think that's a better way to put it) the more marginalization you inhabit. Which also makes a lot of men of color double down in what little power it does grant's them (sometimes going to bigger like displays of power than the subtler types of white men), which you could argue Armand also goes for/participates in with the staging of the trial.
I hope anything I wrote here makes sense. But yeah, I think that the patriarchal husband/edwardian wife comparison even if it works as a lense to analyze Loustat, it falls apart for Louis & Armand.
20 notes
·
View notes
Oh my god i have no idea if you remember, but when i was watching a stream of yours a while ago i talked to yall about some lurantis sketches i had done, and the rest of the chat wanted me to draw a guzma larvesta fusion.
And well, i just wanted to say I JUST remembered that and noticed i never tagged nor posted the drawings 💀💀
If you dont remember thats completely fine, ill be posting them soon anyways. Best of look with your new publishers and comic VAs Eleanor 🧡!!!
I ACTUALLY DON'T JGFJGFJKGJKDG But if you ended up drawing the fusion I'd actually be super curious to see it :DD You can absolutely tag me or DM the post to me if you want to, that's fine!
Oh and thank you! I actually don't have a new publisher yet :'D STILL working on that, the industry is TUFF
25 notes
·
View notes
The Wayhaven Chronicles was never really like “good” it’s more of a… cute lil game where I want to rewrite 100% of it out of spite or just because like the POTENTIAL is there to be really interesting but it needs a lot of substantive editing and narrative structure work to be Actually Good
@ Mishka im available for hire as an editor btw I have a degree and everything 😉
31 notes
·
View notes
So many people are like "games are an art because they have music or story or drawings in them". WRONG. Games are an art in their own unique way. A good puzzle game can be an outstanding piece of art in the medium of logic without having any of that stuff. That homebrew card game you made with a standard pack of playing cards is a piece of art. Games are an art of control and player choice.
15 notes
·
View notes
Sometimes I see someone describe a book/thing as 'character-driven' and I recognise it/go check it out and go 'bitch, what characters? Those bland cardboard cutouts who get bounced around by the plot?'
I'm seriously confused by your definition here
8 notes
·
View notes