#requires further and deeper analysis

[codenamesazanka]

any chance of me being okay with Shigaraki taking up the name 'Shimura Tenko' again has withered, meta-wise. I hate seeing that name in Deku's dialogue bubbles. I hate that he feels he can call Shigaraki that. All he ever cared about was The Crying Child - Tenko. Then he failed to save Tenko. THEN Deku had the gall to expressed disappointment that Tenko - the very source of the kindness and friendship that readers all kept saying is why Shigaraki is still Tenko, why he should be saved, how the League is proof of 'Tenko' still existing! - would stay being leader of the League of Villains. And Deku saying 'Tenko' is supposed to be some sort of win???? Supposed to be touching?????

And I hate that this is probably how All Might and Gran Torino finds out the name of Nana's grandson, because they never bothered to check on the family and never tried to save Shigaraki and All Might tries to comfort Deku by saying 'well how did he look at the moment of his death?' as if that fixes anything, and now they're going to use that name. Never tried to save the boy when he was Shigaraki Tomura. But now they can mourn Shimura Tenko. because that's who deserved to be cared about. The melancholic reminder of a 5-year-old ghost, connected to someone they actually cared about. Not a villain they might have no connection to, god forbid. Why would they ever save an evil rando like that?

I think none of them should ever be allowed to say that name. They don't deserve knowing it.

[lobotomiesatclaires]

Lighter Kink and Psychology Analysis - Zenless Zone Zero

Full disclaimer: I don’t play Zenless Zone Zero, but through my friend’s love of the game and Tumblr osmosis, I’ve learned a great deal about Lighter. I find the differences between his canon and fanon interpretations fascinating, so I thought it would be interesting to break down the psychology of kinks and what I think Lighter’s are. I’m going to focus on the ones I believe he has, and if people want me to go into further detail, let me know! Also if it was clear from the title 18+ content below

Exhibitionism – Subcategories: Semi-Public Sex, Secret Keeping, and Risk Play

Lighter is fascinating because he’s full of contradictions. He doesn’t like having his picture taken and prefers to keep a low profile, yet he wears flashy clothes and takes on high profile work where he cannot NOT be noticed. He wants to be left alone but craves connection with people. Part of this can be attributed to losing so many important people due to his own actions, but I think another part of it is Lighter’s hopeless romantic streak. He wants to die for love, and I think part of that is tied to finding someone worthy of that sacrifice.

He’s not interested in people who praise him or send him gifts because, to him, they don’t truly know him- and if they did, they wouldn’t want anything to do with him, he thinks. This low self-esteem and disorganized attachment style create a loop where he desperately craves connection, has opportunities for it, but never fully lets his walls down to allow a deeper bond. Because of his past and the fear of never being truly understood, Lighter communicates in subtle ways. In-game, he can give the player purple lilacs. In the language of flowers, purple lilacs symbolize one’s first love or the first time one feels love for someone. However he leaves on a job right after, to stop any possibility of asking him more about why he gave them to you.

When it comes to sex, Lighter has experience, but in romantic love, he’s very much a virgin, in my opinion.

In line with this, I think Lighter would be needy as a partner, in constant need of validation but unable to ask for reassurance. He hates when his friends are mad at him- it distresses him significantly, which reinforces my earlier points about his emotional sensitivity. Thus, I think one of his core needs would be for a partner to be very possessive of him. Not only would this push back against his feelings of guilt, but it would bulldoze past his tendency to panic at intimacy and distance himself.

While I agree he’d be into risk/thrill-seeking, I don’t think it would be extreme or involve pain. I believe it would be a form of intimate thrill-seeking - the kind that engages an overactive mind.

Imagine:Lighter and his partner in an elevator, on the way to a party. Four seconds before the elevator reaches the destination, his partner pushes him against the wall, kisses him, and whispers in his ear that they’re not wearing anything under their dress coat. The doors open, and they walk out into the party crowd - no one the wiser. Except Lighter.

For example: They’re at the party. Lighter’s charming, slipping easily into conversations with strangers. But every so often, his partner brushes their fingers lightly over the back of his neck, just once, fleeting. No one notices, but Lighter does. His spine straightens slightly each time, a silent acknowledgment: I know who I belong to.

Or: Club sex on the top floor behind a loud rock band. The balcony overlooking a busy street. Going to dinner with friends with a remote in his hand and a small vibrator in his partner’s underwear.

I think Lighter would enjoy all of these scenarios - not just for the risk, but for the inherent trust required to play and keep these secrets between him and his partner. It’s something completely his, something no one else can encroach upon, yet it’s right there, obvious to anyone observant enough to notice.

Marking – Physical and Psychological

Marking, both physical and psychological, would lean into Lighter’s desire for connection. Think: visible signs of his partner’s presence, like a hickey or a faint lipstick smudge on his collarbone.

While traditional marking overlaps with the possessiveness I imagine he’d enjoy, psychological marking might be even more appealing to him. This could involve embedding someone’s presence in his mind through habits, sensory triggers, or routines.

Lighter’s fear of being forgotten or unimportant could be countered by the constant reassurance that he’s always present in his partner’s thoughts. Non-sexually, his partner might leave voice notes for him to listen to during missions or spritz their perfume on his scarf. They might even snap a risky picture and set it as his lock screen so the next time he checks his phone on the job he’s left with a surprise.

Lighter is haunted by the dead, but I think what he truly craves is being haunted by someone living. He would adore his partner’s presence lingering in his personal space, feeding his need for connection without direct confrontation.

Domination – Receiving, Direction Taking

I firmly believe Lighter likes to be dominated. In terms of desire, I don’t think Lighter experiences much spontaneous desire; rather, he’s more connected to responsive desire (see the paper “Sexual Arousal and Desire: Interrelations and Responses to Three Modalities of Sexual Stimuli” by Katherine Goldey and Sari Anders). That man is too tired to be dominant, and as seen in-game, he prefers to take orders. He would definitely call his partner “Boss” in the bedroom.

Beyond the bedroom, I feel Lighter would continue this relinquishment of power through authority transfer dynamics as a coping mechanism for emotional instability, much like he does for the Sons of Calydon. This could manifest in routines or rituals where his partner makes decisions for him, offering a sense of control without the burden of autonomy. It’s both a reaffirmation of care and a release from the pressure of decision-making.

Given his tendency to overthink, delegating power outside of sex could ease his mental load and reinforce security in his relationships. I think Lighter would enjoy having his partner pick out his clothes, jewelry, ect, decide small daily routines, or even manage his finances in a consensual dynamic. This creates a structure where emotional care is embedded in everyday life, not just during intimacy.

Additionally, given Lighter’s need for emotional grounding and his craving to feel “claimed,” collaring - whether in a literal BDSM context or as an everyday symbolic gesture - would be something he could secretly obsess over. If Lighter were given a necklace, choker, or even a collar (especially since he loves jewelry), he’d never take it off. He’d wear it under his clothes, hidden from everyone else but always present. On rough days or when away from his partner, just feeling it against his skin would serve as silent reassurance, grounding him.

It would satisfy both his exhibitionist streak (a hidden “secret” between him and his partner) and act as a reminder: I’m not lost. I belong somewhere. To someone.

For example: if before a mission his partner was to kiss him goodbye, place a necklace around his neck and say “Come back wearing this” he would tug at the small chain subconsciously the entire time he’s gone. He would sleep with it on, shower with it, and when he returned, the metal would be warm and oxidised from his skin, his skin stained from the metal.

Praise Play

An extension of his need for domination and grounding, I see praise play as a huge turn-on for Lighter. While some believe degradation is one of his kinks, I think it’s the opposite. While he might engage in degradation play if his partner wanted it (and part of him might believe he deserves it due to his low self-esteem), I think he would emotionally shut down if it became a consistent dynamic. To me it would be a similar dynamic to the start of the Astarion romance, fulfilling a role as a tool rather than as a person.

Kinks often reflect core emotional needs. Non-consensual fantasies, for example, are about being desired so intensely that someone is willing to break laws and social norms. Degradation kinks often involve a need for others to see the worst parts of us and want us regardless. However, for sensitive individuals, this negative reinforcement doesn’t bring solace- it simply reaffirms their worst fears and destroys their fragile attempts at building a better self image. I also don't think Lighter would find any attraction in demeaning his partner, I think he would feel unworthy of their attention and trust, especially in the beginning.

Lighter is consistently wracked with guilt and desperately wants to know whether he’s doing the right thing, whether it’s in his job or in a relationship. For someone like Lighter, praise isn’t just arousing, it’s reparative in a way nothing else matches or soothes. Each compliment is a stone in the foundation of a self-worth he can’t build alone. When his partner says, “You’re doing so well,” or “You feel like home, like safety,” it’s not just about sex. It’s about rewriting the narrative he’s been telling himself for years.

Domestic Play

You cannot convince me that the image of Lighter’s partner cooking or doing general domestic chores wouldn’t awaken something deep within him, even though he might not admit it at first. In-game, he respects and surrounds himself with women who embody dominant, traditionally masculine qualities. He’s more than happy to take orders from them, but in terms of romantic or sexual attraction, he seems to have little interest in those traits. I suspect this is because these qualities mirror his old self, and that’s not something he finds much solace in, either romantically or sexually.

I think Lighter would be attracted to someone fundamentally different from those around him, someone softer and more considerate, yet still strong in a more traditionally feminine sense. Given his history of loss, trauma, and the absence of a stable family, I believe he harbors a profound urge for a family-like relationship. His partner would create an environment that feels like home, a concept Lighter likely yearns for but doesn’t fully understand.

Home-cooked meals, small domestic gestures of affection - these would make him unbearably needy, though he’d only show it when alone with his partner.

For example: During mundane moments, making coffee, fixing his jacket - his partner casually murmurs, “You belong to me.” It’s subtle, not always sexual, but it lights up the part of Lighter’s brain that craves validation without having to ask for it.

Things like his partner knowing how he likes his coffee without needing to ask, or grabbing the salt shaker from him because it’s bad for his cholesterol would make him unbearably turned on you cannot convince me otherwise. These small acts of care would hit him hard, far more than overt declarations of love.

For Lighter, being told what to do isn’t about submission- it’s about relief. In a life where his choices have often led to heartbreak, the absence of choice feels like safety.

Sensation Play – Both Sensory Deprivation and Service

Lighter is an overthinker. According to Emily Nagoski’s Come As You Are, overthinking is one of the primary reasons people struggle to achieve climax or engage fully with emotional and sexual vulnerability. When you place too much pressure on external factors - self-image, internal worries, even things as small as ‘the dishes need to be done’ - it inhibits your ability to ground yourself in the present and truly experience pleasure. This is why many people, particularly women, struggle with partnered sex and climax.

For Lighter, orgasm denial or delayed gratification would likely be a huge turn-on, especially in situations where he’s restrained or unable to interact directly with his partner - think handcuffs or shibari. The removal of senses, such as blindfolding, helps heighten arousal by redirecting the energy normally spent on processing visual stimuli toward pure sensation. It doesn’t stop the overthinking; it realigns it, forcing it to focus on the present moment.

For example: His partner lightly places a hand over his mouth while he’s blindfolded - not fully cutting off air, but creating a soft restraint. It’s not about danger; it’s about trust. The lack of visual and verbal control pushes him into a space where he can’t overanalyze - he can only feel.

Considering Lighter’s past - especially his time in the fighting pits, where he described himself as feeling like a zombie. I don’t think he’d enjoy pain or impact play. His physical existence outside the bedroom has already been filled with similar kinds of suffering. Instead, sensation play becomes a refuge - a way to experience his body without violence, without pain. There's a running joke that he fears the sight of blood in game, which is another reason why I believe centering pleasure rather than pain would be more attractive to him.

Emotional Edgeplay

I believe Lighter craves not just physical intensity but emotional vulnerability pushed to its limits, scenarios where trust is tested, intimacy feels dangerous, and attachment triggers are explored in consensual, negotiated ways. Emotional edgeplay isn’t about causing harm; it’s about walking the razor-thin edge of emotional exposure, where the potential for catharsis is as powerful as the risk.

Overstimulation is an aspect of emotional edgeplay, often resulting in emotional release- like crying during or after sex - as the body lets go of trauma it’s been holding onto for too long. Lighter, who is profoundly dissociated from his needs due to guilt and a deep-seated dismissal of his own worth, would find this both terrifying and necessary.

We see hints of this in-game. For example, there’s an interaction with a guide dog trained to seek out the most vulnerable person in the room - that ignores everyone else and goes straight to Lighter. This detail speaks volumes about how disconnected he is from his own emotional fragility; the desensitization runs so deep that he doesn’t even recognize it anymore.

In these moments, speech and affirmation would be crucial, especially during heightened emotional states or low points.

For example: During edging, when he’s trembling with frustration not just sexually, but emotionally his partner gently cradles his face and whispers, “Do you see how wonderful you are when you’re not pretending?”

It’s not just arousing, it’s disarming. Because in that vulnerable space, Lighter isn’t the cool, edgy pit fighter turned bodyguard. He’s just him, stripped of all pretense. No walls, no bravado. Flaws and all. It also provides acceptance by omission, that his partner sees all and accepts all.

Caretaker Dynamics (Reversed Aftercare)

I also believe Lighter would prefer to be the primary aftercare provider, despite this traditionally being the role of the dominant partner. According to Dominatrix Eva Oh, aftercare is a service role, and for Lighter, providing that service would be deeply fulfilling. (It’s a common misconception the Sub role in BDSM is the harder or serving role, because truly Dom’s are required to be very emotionally stable, beholden to their sub and can turn out to be a very stress inducing role for the wrong people). This is why high flying jobs such as CEO’s actually prefer to be submissive because it is the only place in their life they get to be minded.

While aftercare is essential after most sexual interactions especially those involving intense scenes, reversed caretaker dynamics, where the more emotionally fragile partner provides aftercare, would align perfectly with Lighter’s psychology. Despite his vulnerabilities, he has an overwhelming desire to feel needed, to prove his worth in relationships even when he feels broken.

Being allowed to “take care” of his partner post-sex, even when he’s emotionally raw, satisfies this need. It’s not about dominance or submission- it’s about anchoring himself through acts of care.

For example: After an intense session, when his partner is spent and emotionally vulnerable, Lighter insists on making tea, carefully bandaging small marks, or physically holding them - even if he’s the one shaking. He tucks the blanket around them, brushes sweat-damp hair from their forehead, and whispers, “I’ve got you.”

In those moments, his value isn’t measured by strength or stoicism. This role reversal reinforces his sense of purpose without undermining his vulnerabilities. He doesn't always have to be the strong one here, in this moment.

Closing Thoughts

Ultimately, Lighter’s kinks aren’t just about physical pleasure, they’re reflections of his deepest fears, needs, and desires. They’re coping mechanisms woven into intimacy, helping him navigate a world where connection feels both a gift and a threat. Whether through domination, praise, or emotional edgeplay, his kinks allow him to confront the parts of himself he hides from the world.

At the heart of it all, Lighter wants to be known.

References

Disclaimer I have dyslexia and English is my second language so I apologize for mistakes.

Theswaddle.com. (2019). The Psychology of Sexual Kink. [online] Available at: https://www.theswaddle.com/what-is-kink-the-psychology-behind-sexual-behavior [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].

admin@blossmcart (2023). A dive into the definition of Lilac Flower and its Significance. [online] Blossmcart Flowers. Available at: https://blossmcart.com/blog/definition-and-significance-of-lilac-flower/#:~:text=The%20Lilac%20is%20a%20flower,purple%20Lilac%20signifies%20first%20love. 

‌Li, S. (2024). The Psychology of Kink: A Cross‐Sectional Survey Investigating the Association Between Adult Attachment Style and BDSM-Related Identity Choice in China. Archives of Sexual Behavior, [online] 53(6), pp.2269–2276. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-024-02829-1.

When Kinks Come to Life: An Exploration of Paraphilic Behaviors and Underlying Predictors. (2024). The Journal of Sex Research. [online] doi:https://doi.org/10.1080//00224499.2024.2319242.

The Kink Orientation Scale: Developing and Validating a Measure of Kink Desire, Practice, and Identity. (2024). The Journal of Sex Research. [online] doi:https://doi.org/10.1080//00224499.2024.2387769.‌

Oh, E. (2020). I Was a Corporate Slave Until I Became a Professional Dominatrix. [online] VICE. Available at: https://www.vice.com/en/article/eva-oh-dominatrix-sex-kink/ [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].

Youtube.com. (2025). Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_Ng_b28uxM [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].

‌Youtube.com. (2025). Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2_aCw-DMq0 [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].

‌

[mesetacadre]

why exactly are anarchists so detached from communism? I feel like they might have somewhat similiar goals but clearly theres some issue that makes them unable to cooperate

is it just the anarchist's rejection of even socialist states as bad?

The line of thinking that anarchists and communists share the same goals, namely the destruction of class oppression, money and the state, is a superficial but nevertheless common and easy mistake to make, one which I think most communists have made at one point. The disagreement seems to merely have to do with the question of the state and how to use it (or not use it), and the velocity with which those abolitions should be sought. But this disagreement is not the real core of the question, it's the main symptom of the actual difference.

The difference lies in the use of two completely different frameworks of analysis. Let's continue using the argument around the state to explain the difference. Anarchists believe¹ that the state itself is simultaneously the cause and perpetuator of class oppression, or oppression in general. Therefore, abolish the state, and everything else comes tumbling down by its own weight. Marxists, on the other hand, hold that the state, while it is a perpetuator of class oppression, it is not a cause, rather, the state fits into a larger relation between the superstructure and the infrastructure. The latter contains everything directly related to the mode of production and its associated processes and relations. The former contains everything else in a society, including the state, but also the police, the media, education, etc. The infrastructure supports the superstructure, while the superstructure protects and justifies the infrastructure. The state protects the mode of production, which is the actual source of class exploitation, but it's the mode of production that supports the existence of the state.

By destroying a state in any practical sense, you destroy the best tool the proletariat has to protect its own interests during the process of completely transforming society into a communist one. The state is a tool of class oppression, of any class unto any class. If the proletariat as a class take control of the state, after having replaced the mode of production to a collectivized one, then the state will serve to oppress the bourgeoisie as a class to protect the now non-exploitative mode of production. If you destroy this tool, the proletariat is left defenseless against the still powerful external threats and the extant internal threats.

Identifying the state as a source of oppression in and of itself comes from a liberal framework, in which any expression of oppression becomes the oppression itself, and in which tails wag their dogs. Beyond this superficially narrow but deeply broad difference in frameworks, the actual practical instances of that flawed liberal framework are inefficient, counterproductive and at times dangerous actions. Cooperation is possible, nothing further from the truth, but it benefits no one to do so under the impression that it's a cooperation born of similar outlooks on the world. It's a contextual cooperation born of a common opposition, which is not a sufficient requirement to define a useful and progressive course of action.

because of reasons I could be very mean about, it's nigh-impossible to come up with a deeper definition of anarchist ideas without some anarchist or other popping up about how the anarchism they believe in does not actually contain that definition. For the sake of this post, I'm not going to placate this by amending every statement with "most anarchists", "almost all anarchists", and other such expressions.

[ocelotlesbian]

i've been thinking over this aspect of his character for a while now and i think i have enough material to make a post about it, so...

> genderqueer mitsuba!!

an analysis on mitsuba's peculiar gender expression and queercoding! ( ´∀ ` )

full post under the cut!!

before i begin, a disclaimer: mitsuba is canonically a boy, and i'm not trying to say he isn't!! he can be a boy and also genderqueer. genderqueer folks can still identify with the "binary" labels of girl or boy, since being genderqueer doesn't require anything aside from having a queer experience with gender. and as i'll explain in this post, his gender is pretty damn queer!!!

also for the record i myself am genderqueer. lesbian flavor

now, to start off: the immediately obvious.

it's pretty obvious that mitsuba is the most gender non-conforming character in the entire manga. from his medium length pink hair neatly tied up in a little ponytail, to more subtle details like his hands being drawn similarly to that of the female characters & his occasionally drawn bottom lashes, which no other male characters seem to have.

along with his general "you should not ask me to lift heavy objects" demeanor, all these more feminine details serve to make him distinct from all the other male characters in the manga, putting him in a kind of seperate category consisting solely of him.

and this idea of him being in his own seperate category ties in with other important aspects of his character as well!

for sousuke, it ties into how he was ostracized from his peers for standing out too much, and for no.3tsuba, it ties into how he feels alienated from humans & other supernaturals and feels as though he doesn't belong anywhere. if you think about it, it's all pretty analogous with the queer experience!

and going further with sousuke specifically, the turning point of his character arc was his conversation with kou on the stairs, where kou essentially tells him that he didn't have to try and fit into a polite box to make himself more likeable, and he can just express himself the way he wants to. ...i don't think i need to explain how this sentiment could easily be tied in with his queerness and gender expression lol

now i could go even deeper into how queercoded mitsuba's character arc is, but i think i'll leave it here for now.

another thing i wanna go over is the genderswap episode of the after school hanako-kun anime. now, the events of this episode including him didn't actually happen in the manga, so the canonicity is rather dubious. but i still think it's worth going over!!

this episode deviates from the manga by having mitsuba join hanako & sakura in the genderswap shenanigans. in the episode, mitsuba gets hit with the gender reassignment surgery beam and... well, basically nothing happens.

the joke here is obviously the fact he already looks like a girl, so you wouldn't really have to change anything in a genderswap, but the part i find the most interesting is how he himself didn't notice a change whatsoever.

i'm not sure how the specifics of the genderswap robot work, but i'd imagine he'd notice something was up, right? so to me, this scene just hammers in the fact that he's just kind of unnaffected by / outside of most things relating to gender. he's in his own gay little corner, he's immune to this shit!!

so in conclusion, mitsuba's gender is in fact very queered!! his queerness & gender expression is extremely interlinked with his character arc and motivations of feeling othered from the rest of the world, and i just felt like this needed to be discussed. and also i love him lots. <3

end of post!!! thank you for reading my autistic ramblings ^_^

[bumbled-bees]

Lily’s Surface-Level Analysis: A Shallow Approach to Media

Lily’s media critiques are often shallow, reactionary, and plagued by her fundamental incuriosity and black-and-white thinking. Rather than engage with deeper themes, allegory, or metaphor, Lily tends to take everything at face value. This refusal to explore nuance not only weakens her media analysis but also reflects her broader pattern of impulsiveness and her need for clear-cut narratives where she’s always right.

Incuriosity and the Demand for Simplicity

Lily’s incuriosity is one of her most defining traits. She’s openly hostile to recommendations from her audience, dismisses ideas that challenge her perspective, and refuses to put in the effort to understand concepts that aren’t immediately obvious. This mental laziness extends heavily into her media analysis, where she consistently refuses to dig beneath the surface.

She’s shown time and time again that she’s uninterested in doing the work to engage with complex narratives — unless they’re spoon-fed to her in the most direct, unambiguous terms. If a story requires thoughtful interpretation or subtlety, Lily will reject it as “poorly written” rather than admit she overlooked key themes.

Misunderstanding Metaphor

A prime example of this is her infamous take on Steven Universe, where she criticized the series for “locking Ruby and Sapphire inside Garnet,” arguing that it erased their relationship. This fundamentally misunderstands the entire point of Garnet’s character — that Garnet is the relationship. The show’s creators didn’t "lock them away"; they used Garnet to symbolize the stability, love, and partnership between Ruby and Sapphire.

Lily’s inability (or unwillingness) to grasp this metaphor speaks volumes about her approach to media. Rather than engaging with the emotional depth and symbolism, she dismissed it outright because it wasn’t spelled out for her.

Black-and-White Thinking and Binary Judgments

This shallow thinking also ties into Lily’s intense black-and-white worldview. For her, stories must be explicit and direct — anything that requires interpretation risks being twisted into something “bad.” She’s deeply uncomfortable with ambiguity, which limits her ability to analyze complex narratives.

If a creator attempts to convey themes through subtext, Lily often assumes they’re being “cowardly” or “lazy.” She demands that stories explicitly state their messages and avoids narratives that require patience, thought, or introspection. This leads her to label media as “bad” simply because it doesn’t align with her narrow expectations.

Her fixation on absolutes further weakens her critiques. If a creator compromises with studio executives, Lily will dismiss their work as inherently corrupt or “selling out.” She’s openly stated that she has “no sympathy” for creators who face pushback from their studios, claiming they should “just fight harder” — a statement that reveals how little she understands real-world creative industries.

Impulsiveness and Superficial Analysis

Lily’s impulsive nature — her tendency to act without thinking or planning — also shapes her shallow media critiques. Much like her frequent lies and contradictions, her media takes are driven by gut reactions rather than careful thought.

This was especially evident during her Dragon Age video series, where she skipped through key dialogue, ignored lore, and then confidently declared the series poorly written — despite missing crucial information that would’ve explained the very things she criticized. Instead of admitting fault, she doubled down, presenting her shallow interpretation as if it were objective truth.

Her impulsive style means she’s often unwilling to revisit her initial conclusions. Once she’s decided something is “bad,” she rarely reflects or revises her stance — even when presented with evidence that she misunderstood the material.

Control and Refusal to Learn

Lily’s refusal to engage deeply with media is also tied to her need for control. Just as she manipulates conversations, cuts off critics, and deletes inconvenient evidence, her media critiques are an attempt to dominate the narrative. By presenting herself as an authority while ignoring key details, she ensures her audience can’t challenge her without directly calling her out — something she actively discourages.

She also actively dissuades her viewers from seeking out additional perspectives, framing her own takes as the only valid interpretation. This echoes her tendency to erase conflicting narratives in her personal life — like her shifting stories about Stockholm or her manipulation of events to paint herself as a perpetual victim.

The Result: Shallow, Performative Criticism

Lily’s incuriosity, binary thinking, and need for control culminate in media “critiques” that are ultimately performative rather than insightful. Instead of exploring themes, dissecting symbolism, or considering alternative perspectives, she relies on surface-level reactions designed to reinforce her own biases.

Her fans — conditioned to take her word as gospel — rarely push back, further encouraging Lily’s lazy analysis. And when those who do understand the material criticize her, she dismisses them as “obsessive stalkers” or deliberately misrepresents their arguments to avoid accountability.

In the end, Lily’s shallow critiques reveal far more about her own flaws than they do about the media she discusses. They reflect her refusal to challenge herself, her desperate need for control, and her unwavering belief that her first impression is always correct — no matter how ill-informed or incomplete it may be.

[tokiro07]

Ichi the Witch ch.22 thoughts

[Dess' Contract's Got Some Mighty Fine Print]

(Topics: speculation - worldbuilding/narrative progression, character analysis - Desscaras/Ichi, thematic analysis - Family)

Before I get into the extremely enticing character implications of this chapter, I have a quick worldbuilding question:

Where...did the spell for this contract come from?

We know that magical items exist such as the leg-booster boots, but it hasn't really been delved into yet how such things are made. Do they have a pre-existing Magik's spell applied to them, or is there a unique method of creating a spell from scratch and embuing it into an item?

If it's the latter then creating a magic contract should be easy enough, you just draft up paper that enforces the stipulations of the words written on it, easy peasy. If it's the former, though, what Magik has that ability? Can any given contract be created, or is it specific to the Mentor-Pupil Blood Contract?

It doesn't really matter, and I only just thought of this question while writing this review rather than agonizing over it since reading the chapter, but it's still the kind of minor inconsistency that just barely holds this series back from being everything I know it can be

As for what it is, though, this chapter's glimpse into the ongoing character study of Desscaras and her relationship with Ichi only further solidifies this as my current favorite in Jump's roster

The Mother Who Stepped Up

There is an incredible amount of nuance to Desscaras' motivations for making such a dangerous contract with Ichi

First and foremost, as she tells Ichi, it's her way of taking responsibility for his life being uprooted and threatened. If she had been able to find a way to circumvent Uroro's trial, if she'd actually kept Ichi a secret from Mantinel, if she'd taken any other path, Ichi might not be set to die, and she can't pretend that isn't the case

Normally, Desscaras comes off as laidback and irresponsible, but I think that's more about things like navigating bureaucratic red tape than it is about peoples' wellbeing. When push comes to shove, Desscaras does actively fulfill her duties without complaint, it's just that to her, her duties are about fighting monsters and protecting people, not answering work e-mails or filing reports

By putting Ichi in this situation, she has endangered him, going directly against her own principals. This contract is a way of making amends for that, a statement that she isn't trifling with his life and takes his safety extremely seriously. If he should die, then she will repay his loss in kind

This leads into the reason she gave to Monegold and Shirabedonna: that she doesn't want to have peace that requires someone else's sacrifice, least of all a child's

The One Who Walks Deeper into Omelas

This is Desscaras' direct answer to and rejection of the Omelas Child conundrum: if she can't stop the child's suffering, she won't just walk away either - she'll help support the peace. This way the child doesn't suffer alone, and has some kind of happiness to show for it, while also allowing her to take an active role in protecting everyone else

After all, it's not that Desscaras is choosing the child over everyone else. Everyone deserves peace and happiness, it's just that with the knowledge that the child is the only one who doesn't get it, she'd never be able to appreciate her own again. By voluntarily choosing to bear some of the world's weight, Desscaras can feel like she's earned whatever peace she manages to take from it, secure in the knowledge that she did what no one else would: gave some peace, no matter how small, to the suffering child

This also serves to act as an indictment of Monegold's leadership, as while she definitely objected to Jikishirone's prophecy, she still kind of just resigned herself to it. She heard the prophecy, got angry, and...didn't do anything else. She may have been trying to think of a way, but as I said last week, it's just generally accepted that Jiki's words will come to pass unless she gives an alternate path - since the only alternate was the destruction of the world, Monegold likely wouldn't have made a real effort to avert the fate ascribed to Ichi

Now, though, Monegold's greatest asset has just said two devastating things to her face: 1) "if he dies, I die;" and 2) "good luck sleeping at night." Desscaras' actions have put into perspective for Monegold what a post-Ichi world will look like for her, which hopefully will give her the kick in the pants she needs to actually do something about it

At the very least, it ensures that Monegold won't get in the way of Desscaras doing something about it

Blood of the Covenant

For all of the practical and philosophical reasons Desscaras has, there's really only one that truly matters, one statement that Desscaras wants to make above all others: that she cares about Ichi

She wants Ichi to stay in her life, to take care of himself, to live

And if he won't do any of those things for his own sake, then by god, he'll do it for hers

"If you die, then I die" is an excellent inversion of Ichi's Death for Death; whereas it usually means "a kill for a kill," it now means "you are no longer playing with your life alone." If Ichi is reckless and charges in without a second thought on the basis that his life is going to end sooner or later anyway, then he now runs the risk of getting Desscaras killed along with him, which by his own philosophy would make him a murderer

This pulls double duty both by incentivizing him to stay safe and by showing him that someone wants him to stay safe

When his parents left him in the woods with a knife, they wordlessly said to him "we want you to die, but we're too cowardly to kill you ourselves. Starve, get killed by a beast, or kill yourself, we don't care, just do it away from us"

Desscaras' contract, meanwhile, says just the opposite. "I want you to live, and I'll fight to make sure you do. Live how you like, go where you like, do what you like, but whatever you do, just promise to come back to me"

I don't know if Desscaras knows Ichi's past; they've certainly had the opportunity to discuss it off-screen, but it's never been stated that they've opened up to each other about that sort of thing. My instinct is that she has no idea what this means to him, only that it means everything to her

Ichi, meanwhile, certainly has no idea about Libro, and likely can't comprehend why Desscaras would want someone like him as family. But what it means to her isn't his concern right now, because it means everything to him

They have no idea what the other has lost, only what they themselves have, and what this contract represents to each of them is the chance to get it back. Ichi doesn't know why Desscaras wants to give it to him, and Desscaras doesn't know why Ichi accepted, but both of them now have someone who has implicitly told them that they are willing to fill the hole in their lives, and that's all that matters

This is also why the little matter of Ichi being unwittingly enslaved is so easy to sweep under the rug

Siblings, Siblings

Naturally, once Ichi learns that the contract has forcibly made him subservient to Desscaras, he becomes indignant and demands that it be undone. He was tricked, after all, and he doesn't want to follow unreasonable orders

However, once Desscaras is out of the room, Ichi doesn't ruminate on his indentured servitude, that's the furthest thing from his mind. Instead, it is Desscaras' original words that resound in his heart: "a home is a place you can come back to, no matter where in the world you are." Even if she threw in a major downside right at the end, Desscaras' true message has been received loud and clear

It also remains to be seen just how far Desscaras is going to go with her ability to lobby commands at Ichi. Honestly, her commands so far have been pretty standard fair for a mentor - "cook for me, clean for me, learn the more menial aspects of our trade." I don't see her extorting favors out of him or anything, just little things to make her own life less stressful or to teach him a good work ethic

Plus there's the fact that her gloating was sandwiched between her initial pitch and her justification to Monegold. While the reveal of the slavery clause may seem to invalidate the sentiment of what she told Ichi directly, her confrontation with Monegold and soulful assertion that she sees Ichi as family confirms that nothing she said was a lie

What this tells me is that she never intended to pull a fast one on Ichi, nor was she being opportunistic to use her newfound power as a bonus to all of her previous motivations. No, I think she was just...embarrassed

As I said last week, Desscaras isn't one to be vulnerable. She's the Strongest Witch, and that comes with the expectation that she has no weakness

Like I said, Ichi doesn't know about Libro. He doesn't know that he's filling a void for Desscaras the way she is for him, and she doesn't want him to know

She doesn't want him to know how much she cares, she just wants him to feel cared for. So to hide the truth, she turns around and laughs in his face. She presents it as transactional, the void in Ichi's life being filled in exchange for free labor, when in reality the emotional aspect is completely mutual

And I think on some level, Ichi already has that figured out. Like I said, he moves on from it pretty fast and is able to smile warmly at the thought of having a home despite Desscaras' nasty attitude. Whether Ichi has any direct experience with family relationships in the first place, I think Ichi understands already that this sort of teasing, capricious behavior is just how Desscaras is and was all part of what he was signing up anyway

He understands that being family means seeing more of each other, for better and worse. Everything he knows Desscaras to be, lazy and selfish, won't cease to be true just because they share blood now, and if anything will be amplified. But he'll also see the Desscaras who was honest with him, who offered to provide for him, who wants to be with him. I think Ichi has known Desscaras long enough already that he recognizes when she's being genuine and when she's being defensive, so he knows that when she calls him her "dog," it's to guard her heart rather than to put him down

With this in mind, I think it's quite likely that "Family" is going to become one of the running major themes across the story, and that the relationship between Ichi and Desscaras alone won't be the only angle we approach it from

The Desscaras Bunch

Though it's been a hot minute since she had any real dialogue, Kumugi is still a member of Team Desscaras, and one who will certainly be used to further the Family theme. Her backstory has already been established to center around her family's dismissal of her abilities, making her a perfect parallel to Ichi: where Ichi's family abandoned him physically, Kumugi's abandoned her emotionally

Ichi's acknowledgment of Kumugi already shows how he can fill her void, and Desscaras' forceful interjection into conversation with Kumugi shows how Kumugi can fill their voids in turn. Both of them have an established dynamic with her that is set to be explored as the story goes on, and the interplay between their dynamics when together and alone offers even more opportunities for depth and growth

Even Uroro is likely to be a part of this family. Right now he's antagonistic with Ichi and Desscaras, but he did once ask Kumugi to be friends. Sure, he definitely had some ulterior motive, but it shows that he has the capacity to interact with members of the group outside of just Ichi, and therefore won't be confined to only one or two dynamics

And of course, Nishi has no plans to stop with only four members of the group. As Jiki's newest prophecy foretells, they're about to add a fourth "stalwart companion" to the team

I'm not going to go too far into speculating on this character since we know so little, but we do know two things: 1) that they violently hunt Magiks, and 2) they're apparently a man

The Arc Where a Man--

Viz always cuts out the editors' notes, but as you may have seen other folks mention already, in the original Japanese, he's referred to as "'a man' who tramples on Magiks." The quotes are suspicious, but they could just be there to highlight his gender rather than call it into question

While it is possible that he's actually a woman, for the moment I'm going to operate under the assumption that he's a man solely because I think it presents a more interesting angle to explore the world from

Case in point: I do not think that this person is a Male Witch like Ichi. Rather, I think that he wants to be, and is hunting Magiks to see if he can find a spell that he can actually use

Remember, in ch.1, it was stated that there were a handful of prerequisites that Ichi had to meet to use Magic:

Facing a Magik that allowed a man to pass its trial

A body and mind well-trained enough to handle its usage

The capacity to acquire a Magik at all

The first criteria is actually pretty easy - most Magiks' trials don't actually disqualify men in the first place! It's just that no man would ever try because it's "widely believed" that men can't use Magic. So all that's really needed is for a man to make an attempt rather than for the Magik to allow it

The second is also a no-brainer - look at this guy's bod! He's not excessively jacked or anything, but he's definitely drawn to look like a trained fighter, and even if we ignore his design, he's standing in the viscera of a giant frog! He ripped that thing apart with his bare hands! He's clearly at least comparable to Ichi in physical strength if not more, and what a "trained mind" means is still unclear even for Ichi, so we won't worry about it

All that's left then is to actually acquire a Magik, and the only way to know if you can is to try. So, by shaking down Magiks and asking for their trials, this guy increases his odds of finding a Magik that he's capable of acquiring simply through quantity

However, I don't think it's a matter of compatibility. If it were as simple as the Witch and Magik being a match, Togeice probably wouldn't have been able to acquire Macilvaine who clashed with her persona and aesthetic. No, I think it's a lot more fundamental than that:

I think that men might literally lack a Magic Circle

The way it's portrayed, it seems like a...cavity within the soul, a hollowed-out portion of the self meant for housing Magiks. For whatever reason, whether it's biological or spiritual, most men simply don't have Magic Circles, while women inherently do. Or, perhaps, men simply have too small of Magic Circles to be able to fit Magiks in the first place

Maybe that's why Ichi was able to do it: because he was either born with or otherwise created a Magic Circle inside of himself. Maybe he accidentally stumbled across the method to do so. Maybe countless men have and have simply never tried to use it because they had no idea they had! Maybe Minakata somehow implanted one into him, who knows?

I don't expect to get the answers to this one anytime soon, but if this new recruit is a man, I think he'll be an important piece in the puzzle for us to understand this element of the worldbuilding. I think he'll also provide a unique fighting style among the cast, being solely physical as opposed to Desscaras' mostly magical and Ichi's mixed styles, plus parallels to everyone else's narratives. The one I'd be most excited to see is comparing his attempts to overcome a perceived limitation to Kumugi's resignation to being incapable, but I'm not going to hold my breath just in case

Buuut if they are a woman, I'm certainly not going to complain, especially with those cute freckles!

Until next time, let's enjoy life!

[astercontrol]

the most introspective analysis of why the hell i'm into Tron fic

So it can be interesting to explore the weird web of connections between what we enjoy in fictional fantasy and what we actually want in real life. I mean, all sorts of connections and contrasts, and our needs and wants in life do bleed into our daydreams and our favorite fiction, in some way or another.

But it's not as simple as just fantasizing about the same thing you want.

And it can be pretty futile to try and theorize reasons why a thing you like in fiction might connect to your real life. Very little chance of proving or disproving anything for sure. Still, sometimes, I guess it can be intriguing just as a sort of… self-exploration exercise.

And I've been trying to do some of that with my love for the Tron fandom.

There are whole other essays I can write about parts of why the fandom appealed to me-- why for example I like the idea of erotic stories set inside a computer world, between bodies made of electronic data-- or why I like to imagine the Programs' anatomy and their acts of intimacy in the exact way I do. And all of that probably says things about me… things that I could put lots of words into analyzing.

But right now I'm going to focus on the bemusing topic of just where that love has ended up fixating.

Primarily on the original 1982 film, and more specifically, on fan theories about the relationship between Programs and the Users who wrote them.

So the premise of the film is simple, in a way that branches into a lot of complexity pretty fast: "What if computer software had feelings?" The setting is Encom, a programming corporation in which all the programs, for some unexplained reason, are alive in humanoid forms resembling the programmers who wrote them. This seems to have occurred spontaneously, unknown to anyone on the outside-- but inside the computer system all the programs just go on living in a mysterious and beautiful world, with their own types of love and work, friendship and conflict and war, and religious faith in their Users.

The supposed main character, Flynn, finds himself inside that world and tries to help them. But he's not the main subject of my fascination. See, he is a human programmer, but none of the humanoid programs he meets in there are his own creations. And the dynamic between creator and creation is where my focus seems to have landed.

The movie's portrayal of a lot of things is subtle and open to interpretation-- which of course is what attracts my puzzle-solving, pattern-recognizing mind! But in particular, the bond between Program and User is a fascinatingly complex and broken mixture of different aspects of different kinds of relationships familiar to humans.

Most clearly on the surface, a mixture of religious devotion and work relationships, and perhaps something of a knight's service to a monarch. Slightly below the surface, hints of the relationship to an alter ego; to a deeper and truer part, or ideal version, of one's own self. And of course, distinct undertones of familial and romantic and definitely erotic love.

The erotic aspect of it really seized my imagination, I have to admit. There's a truly intense sexual energy throughout the scene where Tron, alongside his friends, recharges himself on liquid power until he can "feel the Call" of his creator, Alan-1. And that sexual imagery continues and intensifies as he approaches the Input-Output Tower to answer the Call and contact his User.

It's a religious temple, yes, and guarded by a sort of temple priest-- but the priest's outfit is disturbingly phallic, and the ritual of welcoming Tron into the Tower involves speaking ceremonial words about "growing and extending into the realm of the invisible" while Tron stands with both hands clasped over his groin.

If it were played less solemnly-- and not couched in the middle of an ostensibly family-friendly adventure movie-- this scene would be an obvious sexual comedy, with zero further changes required.

And the other sexual undertones, in other aspects of the movie, all seem to link into this.

Flynn, the one User in the computer world, seems to inspire uncontrollable attraction in programs who get close to him. There is a starkly homoerotic feel to the way Ram looks at him while dying in his arms, and the way Tron holds him while welcoming him aboard the Solar Sailer. Those are the sorts of scenes that will feel as unsubtle as a smack on the face to anyone even remotely sensitive to homoerotic subtext.

But then, even more explicitly, there's the scene at the end when Flynn and Yori kiss-- even though Yori is Tron's established romantic partner, and has no interest in leaving him for Flynn. The pull of Flynn's User-Power was just that strong, in that moment.

Tron and Yori's romance is interesting in itself. It's a relationship that seems to exist as an echo of the established romantic relationship between their programmers, Alan and Lora out in the "real" world. Perhaps Tron and Yori don't even know why they're mirroring those patterns. They clearly love each other, but without all the same context that human love has.

They don't seem to be capable of reproduction, and maybe not even humanoid sex. They don't even kiss until at the very end, after Flynn leaves-- where it's implied that they didn't previously know how to kiss until Flynn showed Yori. Not so much a king's exercise of droit du seigneur, but more like a wedding gift from a god-- a goodbye kiss for Yori and also for Tron, given indirectly through her.

And of course there's the Deleted Love Scene, cut from right before Tron and Yori go to the I/O Tower (but included in DVD extras). They meet up in her quarters, ostensibly to plan how they're going to get to the Tower, but Yori shows immediate interest in sneaking in some intimacy while they're alone together.

She magical-girl-transforms into a diaphanously sparkling cape and opens her arms to him. He approaches her, only to stare somewhat blankly and ask again, "How are we going to get to the I/O Tower?" So she improvises, tracing circuits on his body with her finger, under pretense of illustrating the route they could take.

We get only a few seconds of this, and no vocal or facial reaction from Tron, before the scene fades out. But for what it's worth, the response we see in his circuits is the canon basis for the now-ubiquitous theme in erotic fanfiction, where a program's circuitry can turn purple or pink in response to arousal and stimulation.

...So, from all of this, I got the clear feeling that whatever type of sexuality programs may have, it's focused around their own most powerful motivation. The one that's as strong, in its own way, as the human drive to reproduce.

While human sex evolved around reproducing, Program sex evolved around their own closest equivalent urge-- which is just the urge to contact and serve the Users, in whatever way one is programmed to.

And like reproduction, it's not necessary to sexual pleasure. Programs clearly can touch each other in pleasurable erotic ways, with or without a User involved-- just as humans can satisfy each other's sex drives in plenty of non-reproductive ways. Yori and Tron-- and perhaps Tron and Ram as well-- could have had a lifetime of love and mutual circuit-stimulation without ever going to the I/O Tower.

But Tron, at least, seems to be a little bit of a puritan about it, in my interpretation. He will accept sexual relief from other programs as a stopgap… but whenever possible, he prefers to save himself for his User.

And even if he later adapts, settling into a marriage-like relationship with Yori, under the new peace and freedom of the system-- he will still consider his regular meetings with Alan-1 to be an essential focus of his sexuality, a relationship he would never, ever consider giving up, no matter how much he and Yori also love and satisfy each other.

Program love, I imagine, is very ancient-Greek. Polygamous, often, but with variations in how the love is expressed. Polytheistic, too, but with each individual worshiper particularly devoted to a specific patron god.

And I imagine, in their world, the different kinds of love all come with a sexual component. If Ram is ever data-recovered and brought back to life, I imagine he would be Tron's Philia, alongside the Eros of Yori and the Agape of Alan-1. But in the Program sense of those words, the relationships would all be some degree of sexual, making his wife and his friend and his god all partners in a polyamorous quartet-- perhaps even the true meaning of those four squares over Tron's heart.

(This makes the continuation of the plot, years later in the "Tron: Legacy" sequel, all the more tragic. We're told that Flynn took Tron from his original role as security monitor of the Encom computer, and put him to work protecting a new computer world that Flynn was building. We get pretty much no details of the circumstances of this move, only the disastrous fallout from it many years later. And I find it extremely difficult to imagine a scenario where Tron would have agreed to this uncoerced. Whether or not Ram and Yori got to accompany him, Alan-1 certainly didn't. And this would have devastated the Tron I know.)

(So, for my own mental health-- and also to explain how Flynn got away with pirating Encom's security software-- I imagine that he left the original copy of Tron undisturbed. It doesn't erase the tragedy of what the new copy went through… it probably worsens it, if the copy knows he's a copy, knows his loved ones don't even miss him because he's not even really gone. But at least-- at the very least-- it lets me believe that at least one version of Tron lived happily ever after.)

Anyway. All of this is the context in which I've been trying to understand why the hell my mind-- especially the romantic and sexual parts of it-- find this creator-creation love so very compelling.

It is a fantasy of a true love that's unrealistically pure and complete, I suppose. A program is, of course, made up of conditionals, of if-then statements… but the ones governing the permissions reserved for the User must be deeply integral to identity. Especially in programs like these ones: made by programmers in a 1980's-era corporation, and almost all custom-written to serve specific purposes for their creators.

The only one of them whose ownership resembles that of modern software is Ram-- who is subtly implied to have been written by a programmer at Encom, but was then sold to an insurance company and spent some time serving the public there, before being captured by the enemy and brought back to Encom to be imprisoned.

Ram is the only one who ever calls Flynn "My User"-- and I think this is because, to him, designed for the service of End-Users, his User can be anyone. Which, to my observation, reflects in his constant sweet helpfulness toward all who need it, his fierce loyalty to Tron… and of course (to the horniest side of my observation, but still there) the omnipresent air of seductive sluttiness he gives off, in absolutely every scene.

(I don't know who decided to give that program a name evocative of both "taking it vigorously from behind" and being "random access," but holy hell does it fit him. Ram may be corporate property, but he's the most open-source shareware at heart, and I love him so much for it. Actor Dan Shor definitely understood the assignment.)

But even Ram's love, offered openly to so many, is still so simple and pure in its own way. And for a User authorized to use him, it would be as unconditional as the love of any other program in the cast.

So maybe that's the fantasy? Unconditional love, to a degree humans will never quite manage.

Except that in real life, the very idea of unconditional love makes my skin crawl.

From both sides, actually. To love someone else unconditionally is to make yourself horrifyingly vulnerable to abuse. Dogs have unconditional love, and look how badly dogs get treated sometimes. If you couldn't stop loving even under those circumstances-- if your love doesn't even have conditions like "I'll love you as long as you don't hit me with a rolled-up newspaper and lock me in a kennel all day," then what's to protect you?

And from the viewpoint of the one being loved-- well, being unconditional makes the love pretty much meaningless, doesn't it? If another person's love for you is not even conditional on you remaining the same person in any way-- then they sure don't love you for who you are. Why do they love you? What do they love? Can't even be you, exactly… because it would persist even if every aspect of "you" was replaced with something totally different. And yet, somehow, it always seems to exist in the same space and time as you. Following you like a weird possessing ghost. What the hell is it? Is it just an idea of you? How far removed is that idea from any of what you really are?

It's why I've never found it easy to feel very close to any of my blood family. The idea that they love me in a way like that… a devotion that's everlasting no matter how little we have in common, no matter how vanishingly few parts of my personality fit any description that would ever appeal to them otherwise? Bound to me by… who-knows-what? Ugh. It's the stuff of nightmares.

And yet. Isn't it more or less the same thing as the lines of code that bind Tron to Alan-1? And why do I find that bond so beautiful, when the closest things in human life are eldritch horror to me?

Do I somehow feel that this sort of connection is more appealing for erotic love than familial love?

No… I doubt it. if a romantic suitor felt that kind of attachment to me despite having zero other things in common, it would probably come across as equally creepy, if not more so.

Or is it, maybe, that I feel this sort of connection is appealing for religious love? Is that the aspect of Tron and Alan's multifaceted relationship that makes actual sense to me? Is this the sort of bond I like the idea of sharing with a god?

Also doesn't feel quite right to me. I mean, I have never, personally, been able to believe in a god-- or anything that society recognizes as a supernatural power of any kind.

And yes, I do experience the occasional pleasant fantasy of how nice it could be if there was someone in charge, some plan to all this, some kind and powerful being at the top who knew what they were doing and could be trusted to lead us to a good future! But as it is, I find it pretty much impossible to believe that's happening in this world.

And-- in this world, and in regard to the sort of all-powerful entity I was raised to think of as a God-- I feel that, realistically, it would be very bad if such a thing existed.

Because realistically, it would mean we are under the rule of the most absolute-powered, absolutely-corrupt dictatorship imaginable, with no hope of escape, ever. A ruler who constantly (according to our observation of the world) does things, allows things, and (according to various religious texts) commands us to do things, which are downright evil according to our own emotions and our own capacity for reason--

--and which we have no choice but to consider good. Because in the framework of this faith, we have to believe that there is an objective, unquestionable standard for what "good" is-- and we have to believe that this absolute ruler of the universe is the source of that standard, and our only reference for what that standard is. No matter how terrible it feels to us, and how difficult it is to come up with any possible reasoning for how it could be good.

God by definition is good, and Good by definition is what God wants. Perfect circle. To me, a perfect, horrifying dystopia.

So I'm not exactly sure where the User/Program fascination originates for me. Sure, it's a deeply compelling meld of romantic, familial, workplace and religious relationships-- and yet in my own life I pretty much hate the power dynamic, the affront to personal freedom, that goes along with all of those.

And yeah, that includes romance. That same aversion to relationships with total, unconditional devotion is probably part of why I am so close to aromantic, in terms of my connection to other real-life humans.

I have experienced living in a marriage. I have experienced relationships that tried to call themselves romance. And all I can say is that I didn't feel I'd found anything resembling a fulfilling relationship… until I experienced living in the loosely-connected polycule I discovered during my time in LA.

That specific setup didn't work out, for a lot of reasons none of us could fully control, but the taste of it convinced me that this is the kind of relationship I want in my life. A house of roommates who are affectionate friends-with-benefits-- but with enough space to allow everyone a room of their own and clear boundaries. And an understanding that physical and sexual contact between any of these companions can be an acceptable thing, if the people involved want it, but not otherwise.

Enough people that if the arrangement isn't working out for any one of them, that one can feel somewhat free to move on to a better place, without fear of abandoning anyone else all alone.

Enough people that there'll usually be someone there for you, for whatever you need-- whether it's practical help, social company, or sexual relief.

But also enough people that no individual person feels an obligation to always be the one there for anyone else.

I dread the kind of devotion that makes someone feel that obligation, to be always there for someone. It feels to me like it violates personal autonomy. It means any consent you give to anything is automatically unreliable-- how can you, or anyone, be sure you're not just agreeing to something you don't want out of obligation?

I know I have a fierce independent streak. And I'm realizing lately that it's not so much a concern for either "appearing weak" or "imposing on others" -- it's mainly just because other people can't be depended on.

And that's not an insult to them! And the idea that it could be considered an insult says terrifying things, to me, about what society expects of people. Because what does it mean, when you're expected to be someone that people can depend on, can rely on? It means your own needs always come after that. It means you are a step away from being enslaved, being property, having no right to put your own needs first.

And sure, when people say someone is "dependable" or "reliable," they rarely mean it in a sense that extreme. Either they are just saying that person is pretty often willing to help-- not nearly always, but just in comparison to other people who are very seldom willing to help--

--or, they do mean the person is always or almost always willing to help-- and they haven't given actual, serious thought to whether that worryingly high willingness is real, or coerced by obligation.

But I give that a whole hell of a lot of thought. When I say I can't depend on other people, I am saying I can't expect to own them as slaves.

And yes, I do know that there are some necessities where it's vital to have something you can rely on more than any one human being should ever be expected to be reliable. For me, often that "something" is a system of my own that I come up with-- one of my fiercely-independent ways of taking care of my own necessities.

And when I can't come up with such a system on my own, the next best option, for me, is to have a large group of people to rely on. I do feel that people can't ethically be treated as "reliable" on an individual level. But as a group, with responsibility spread out enough, it becomes, sometimes, a valid option.

Anyway.

I guess, with all that infodump, I've just painted a pretty clear picture for you of what I'm like to live with.

And in the process, I guess I've made it abundantly clear that in real life, I pretty much loathe the idea of being on either side of anything resembling this Program/User relationship that I romanticize so hard in my fantasies.

So… what gives?

I mean. I'm aware of the whole gamut of things people can enjoy in fiction and fantasy, regardless of how bad they'd be in reality. And I don't judge. But I know that my own fantasies-- the things I personally like to imagine as pleasurable escape-- don't tend to eroticize or romanticize any of the stuff I consider dystopian. At least, when dystopia appears in my fantasies, it's in the context of protagonists working together to fight against it.

My pleasures don't get that dark… not to the point of delighting in the thought of hurt without comfort; torment without love or enjoyment. I can read and appreciate many well-written stories, regardless of topic. But if I read a story where someone is hurt, in a way they don't want and don't enjoy on any level, that dynamic itself will not be an aspect of the story that gives me pleasure.

And when I imagine Programs and Users, I don't even fall into that happy fantasy I mentioned earlier-- the fantasy of a world where God is truly good and has a trustworthy plan for it all. In the context of Tron canon, the Users aren't that kind of gods-- they're human programmers, they're messy and imperfect and sometimes outright malicious, and they rarely have a clear idea of what they're doing or how it's going to go.

And in my daydreams, I don't even imagine that the programs believe in that nice little fantasy. Maybe some of them do at first, like Tron did before Flynn cleared things up in that scene on the Solar Sailer. But as Users and Programs get to know each other's true selves more deeply, growing the relationship into the kind of love I daydream about-- they learn how messed-up it is.

They have no illusions, eventually. The program knows that the User is their superior only in terms of software permissions-- and in many other ways is actually less rational, less capable of untainted ethics and unbiased reasoning than a Program is.

And the Program loves the User anyway. Whole-hearted, unwavering devotion, the deepest motivation and the greatest fulfilment in their whole life-- even knowing that this is all just the result of lines of code somewhere forcing them to feel that.

It doesn't matter. Even with full understanding, those lines of code still make themselves sacred in the Program's eye, and the love persists.

Which, to me, somehow… actually feels perfectly fine? No different from enjoying human emotions and sensations while knowing the evolutionary reasons behind them.

Sure, I can delight in the feeling of affection for others in my life, and the joy of being close to those I feel it for. Sure, it's just chemicals, just oxytocin and serotonin and the bodily reactions they set off, and it evolved to increase survival rates by keeping the social unit together to cooperate in raising the young and hunting food and so on. But who cares. The point is, it feels good.

Sure, I take pleasure in eating good food because my body uses dopamine as an incentive for that action to ensure I stay nourished. Sure, I enjoy sex for the same reason, even though my ancestors evolved that hit of pleasure because it incentivizes reproduction, and yeah, I don't personally plan to reproduce. It still feels good.

So… where's the disconnect?

Why can't I appreciate the idea of real-life familial love or romantic love or religious love in that same way? Why is it just the fictional Program/User versions that I find so attractive-- as well as those specific emotional and sensory experiences that feel to me like the closest thing to real-life equivalents?

And…

And wow, I think writing this all down just helped me figure it out, just now.

And… damn it. Really? Took me this long?

Did I forget the most self-indulgent Program/User fic I've ever written? Even with "A Lightcycle Built For Two" under my belt, I seriously didn't figure this out sooner?

Yay me.

It's not the romantic love. It's not the religious worship. It's not the familial relationships or the workplace relationships.

All of those-- plus the most literal surface imagery, the Program and User themselves-- are vehicles to convey different aspects of a feeling. All of them bring me something, some little frisson of feeling that I enjoy, amid all of what I don't.

But the context in which I like that feeling isn't actually any of the relationships serving here as metaphors.

It's the other one, the one I just barely mentioned only in passing.

The freakin' REASON why it resonates so much with me that Tron programs are played by the same actors as their programmers.

That bit about "relationship to an alter ego; to a deeper and truer part, or ideal version, of one's own self."

It's about that same knightly service, that same unconditional love, that same fierce whole-souled devotion--- but not to someone else.

To being who I am. My best version of me. All the parts of it.

It's about loving myself.

THAT's what resonated with me. THAT's why I like what I like.

Hell yeah.

[morilovern1]

Mori and Chuuya analysis: Whitin Loyalty and Logic.

The world of BSD thrives on its complex characters and their intricate relationships, often blurring the lines between loyalty and manipulation, strength and vulnerability. Among these compelling figures are Mori Ōgai, the enigmatic leader of the Port Mafia, and Chuuya Nakahara, its fiercely loyal yet independent executive. Both characters embody the organization’s dark allure, yet their dynamics and individual arcs reveal layers of humanity, ambition, and control that go beyond the surface.

Mori, a strategic mastermind, wields power with chilling precision, often treating people as pawns to further his goals. In contrast, Chuuya's raw strength, unyielding sense of pride, and complicated relationship with authority make him a foil to Mori's calculated demeanor. Their interactions, though limited in the series, offer a fascinating exploration of leadership, trust, and the weight of responsibility within the mafia's brutal hierarchy.

This analysis seeks to dive deeper into their characters, exploring how Mori’s manipulative tactics and Chuuya’s principled loyalty shape their relationship. By examining their motivations, key moments in the narrative, and their roles within the Port Mafia, we can better understand how these two seemingly different characters contribute to the intricate web of BSD’s storytelling.

Foil and Parallels

Mori and Chuuya as Narrative Foils

Mori and Chuuya serve as contrasting figures in personality, leadership style, and morality. Mori’s cold, calculating pragmatism is the antithesis of Chuuya’s fiery and emotionally charged demeanor. Their juxtaposition highlights the different ways individuals navigate power and duty within the morally ambiguous environment of the Port Mafia.

Parallels in Struggles and Motivations

Both characters wrestle with the weight of their positions in the Port Mafia. While Mori manipulates his subordinates and environments to maintain control, Chuuya grapples with his personal honor versus the brutal necessities of mafia life. Both seek stability and efficiency for the organization, though their methods diverge—Mori relying on foresight and control, and Chuuya on raw strength and loyalty.

Ethics and Morality

Mori’s Ethical Framework

Mori exemplifies a utilitarian perspective where the ends justify the means. He is willing to sacrifice individuals or moral principles for the greater good of the Port Mafia, often leading to morally questionable but strategically sound decisions.

Chuuya’s Moral Dilemmas

Chuuya’s internal conflict lies between his sense of personal honor and the morally ambiguous actions required by his position. His loyalty to the mafia often places him in situations that test his ethical boundaries, forcing him to choose between self-identity and duty.

Narrative Critique of Morality

The narrative critiques both approaches: Mori’s ruthlessness leads to fear and resentment among his subordinates, while Chuuya’s emotional decisions sometimes compromise his effectiveness. Yet, Chuuya’s honor often earns genuine respect, contrasting Mori’s manipulative reliance on fear.

Leadership Styles

Mori as a Leader

Mori’s leadership relies on manipulation, foresight, and calculated decisions. He maintains control through a mix of strategic planning and psychological manipulation, often symbolized by his relationship with Elise—a representation of his control and detachment.

Chuuya’s Leadership

Chuuya’s leadership is more direct and personal, rooted in his strength and charisma. As a leader of the Sheep and an executive in the Port Mafia, he inspires a mix of respect and fear, commanding loyalty through his actions rather than manipulation.

Tensions and DynamicsThe tension between Mori and Chuuya stems from their differing leadership philosophies. Mori sees leadership as a chess game, while Chuuya views it as a battlefield, where personal involvement and honor are paramount.

Personality and Ideological Differences

Mori Ougai

Mori’s pragmatic, utilitarian nature emphasizes efficiency over emotion. He prioritizes the survival and dominance of the Port Mafia above all else, even at the cost of personal relationships or ethics.

Chuuya Nakahara

Chuuya is a study in contrasts: fiery and passionate yet deeply principled. His emotionalism often clashes with the ruthless pragmatism of the mafia world, creating internal and external conflict.

Comparison

Mori’s cold rationalism and Chuuya’s emotionalism highlight their ideological divide. Yet, this contrast also underscores how their respective traits complement the mafia’s needs—Mori’s calculated strategies ensure stability, while Chuuya’s passionate leadership inspires loyalty.

Power Dynamics

Mori’s Authority over ChuuyaMori’s control over Chuuya is multifaceted, relying on institutional authority, manipulation, and subtle psychological pressure. This dynamic emphasizes Mori’s role as a puppet master within the organization.

Chuuya’s Responses

Chuuya’s pride and strong sense of self often clash with Mori’s manipulative tendencies. While he respects Mori’s strategic mind, he resents the control and moral compromises Mori embodies.

Trust and Loyalty

Chuuya’s Loyalty

Chuuya’s loyalty lies more with the Port Mafia as an institution than with Mori personally. While he respects the organization’s structure, his trust in Mori is conditional and often tested by the latter’s decisions.

Mori’s Perspective

Mori views Chuuya as a valuable asset—his loyalty and power are tools to further the organization’s goals. Any personal regard Mori holds for Chuuya is secondary to his utilitarian priorities.

Philosophical Differences

Approach to Leadership

Mori’s leadership is detached and strategic, prioritizing long-term outcomes over individual well-being. Chuuya, by contrast, leads with a hands-on, emotionally driven style that values personal connections and honor.

Views on Power

Mori sees power as a tool for control, while Chuuya struggles with the overwhelming nature of his ability, Corruption. Their differing relationships with power shape their worldviews and mutual understanding.

Moments of Conflict

Tensions in the Narrative

Conflicts between Mori and Chuuya often arise from strategic disagreements, with Mori pushing for cold pragmatism and Chuuya advocating for honor or personal involvement.

Chuuya’s Defiance

Chuuya’s moments of defiance are significant in the narrative, showcasing his refusal to fully succumb to Mori’s manipulative control. These acts highlight his individuality and moral code.

Manipulation vs. Autonomy

Mori’s Manipulative Nature

Mori uses Chuuya’s pride, loyalty, and vulnerabilities to maintain control, ensuring Chuuya remains a key asset to the Port Mafia without allowing him too much autonomy.

Respect or Contempt?

Mori respects Chuuya’s abilities but views him primarily as a means to an end. Chuuya, in turn, tolerates Mori’s leadership out of necessity but often questions his methods and intentions.

Subtle Parallels

Similarities

Both characters share a strong sense of duty to the Port Mafia and a willingness to bear heavy burdens for its sake. They are both ruthless when necessary, driven by a desire for stability and effectiveness.

Differences

While Mori’s ruthlessness is calculated and emotionless, Chuuya’s is driven by passion and honor. Their differing motivations and methods set them apart.

Impact on the Port Mafia

The dynamic between Mori and Chuuya significantly influences the Port Mafia’s structure. Mori’s manipulation ensures stability, while Chuuya’s charisma and strength foster loyalty among subordinates. Their relationship, however, can also create internal tensions, especially when their differing philosophies clash.

Mori as the Calculating Leader

Mori Ōgai, the head of the Port Mafia, is characterized by his cold, calculating nature and his ability to manipulate those around him for the sake of the organization. His leadership style is pragmatic to the extreme, often prioritizing the survival and power of the Port Mafia above all else. This approach makes him a formidable leader but also one who is untrustworthy and morally ambiguous.

Mori’s interactions with Chūya reflect his tendency to view individuals as tools to be utilized. As one of the most powerful ability users in the series, Chūya’s strength is an asset to the Port Mafia, and Mori ensures that it is fully harnessed. However, Mori’s treatment of Chūya often borders on dehumanizing, as he focuses on Chūya’s utility rather than his individuality.

Chūya as the Reluctant Pawn

Chūya Nakahara, on the other hand, is a character who values loyalty and personal agency. Despite his fiery temperament and disdain for authority, Chūya remains committed to the Port Mafia, partly out of a sense of duty and partly because it provides him with a sense of belonging. His relationship with Mori, however, is fraught with tension.

Chūya is acutely aware of Mori’s manipulative tendencies, and this awareness fosters a sense of mistrust. Unlike Dazai, who actively schemes against Mori, Chūya’s resistance to Mori’s control is more subtle. He follows orders but maintains a critical view of Mori’s actions and motives. This duality underscores Chūya’s internal struggle: while he recognizes the necessity of Mori’s leadership, he resents the lack of autonomy it affords him.

Moments of Interaction

One of the most telling moments in their relationship occurs during Chūya’s induction into the Port Mafia. Mori’s role in bringing Chūya into the fold reflects his ability to identify and exploit potential. At the same time, it highlights Chūya’s vulnerability as someone searching for purpose and direction. This dynamic sets the tone for their future interactions, with Mori acting as both a mentor and a manipulator.

Could Mori Be a Father Figure?

Mori’s relationship with Chūya also raises the question of whether he could act as a father figure in Chūya’s life. While Mori’s manipulative tendencies and focus on utility might seem to preclude such a role, there are elements of their dynamic that resemble a paternal relationship. Mori provides Chūya with guidance, albeit in a way that often prioritizes the Port Mafia over Chūya’s personal well-being. This mirrors the dynamic of an authoritarian parent who seeks to mold their child to fit a specific purpose.

For Chūya, who values loyalty and seeks a sense of belonging, Mori’s role as a leader may fill a void left by a lack of familial connection. However, this "father figure" dynamic is inherently fraught, as Mori’s actions are rarely motivated by genuine care. Instead, his guidance is a means to an end, reflecting his cold pragmatism. Chūya’s awareness of this dynamic complicates their relationship, as he must reconcile the authority Mori represents with his own need for agency and self-respect.

And now what you all have been waiting for:

Did Mori Abuse Chuuya?

While it isn't confirmed, and depends on who you ask, i'm pretty sure Chuuya is a victim of abuse by Mori because repeated manipulation does count as abuse.

Examples of Mori's Manipulation of Chuuya:

Control through authority: Mori often uses his position as the boss of the Port Mafia to pressure Chuuya into fulfilling his orders, regardless of Chuuya's personal feelings.

Exploitation of Arahabaki: Chuuya’s powers, which come from his connection to Arahabaki, are dangerous and taxing. Mori appears willing to exploit this ability for the Port Mafia's benefit, potentially disregarding the toll it takes on Chuuya.

Threat of Violence: In the first text, Mori threatens Chuuya and the members of the Sheep (Chuuya's former allies). This demonstrates a clear use of coercion to force Chuuya into cooperation. The casual way Mori delivers this threat underscores his calculating and ruthless personality, making it clear that he prioritizes his agenda over Chuuya’s autonomy or well-being.

"Chuuya-kun, I will withdraw my previous statement of joining the Mafia. Instead, I

would like to offer a joint investigation. The rumors we've heard about the previous boss's return and the 'Arahabaki' that you're after are clearly rooted in the same incident. I think we could achieve a mutually beneficial relationship simply by sharing information, don't you think?"

" .... And if I refuse?"

"I'll kill you." Mori said with a natural tone, like the moment when sugar is put into coffee. "Though it's hard to kill you, even in the Mafia. So I'll kill all your companions in the 'Sheep'. How about it?"

Emotional Manipulation: In the second text, Mori dangles the truth about Chuuya's identity and his connection to Arahabaki in front of him, only to pull it away at the last moment. This is a psychological tactic to assert control over Chuuya, keeping him dependent and unable to fully trust Mori. By withholding this critical information, Mori solidifies his leverage over Chuuya.

"This is the data collected by Randou-kun." Mori showed Chuuya the envelope. "There are many other interesting things written in here."

"In there ... Is the truth ... " Chuuya subconsciously reached his hand out. "Arahabaki's … My true identity ... "

But right before Chuuya grabbed the envelope, Mori quickly pulled it away from him.

Chuuya looked at Mori suspiciously.

"Sorry, but this is the hidden asset a traitor of the organization had." Mori said with the usual smile on his face. "It's something that was originally going to be burned, and therefore can't be so easily disclosed. This is only available to people who are executives or above in the organization."

Chuuya stirred slightly and quietly stared at Mori.

A few short, tense seconds passed between them.

Now, the next one.

"I ... " Chuuya squeezed out the words in a voice similar to that of a boy's. He gently touched the wound on his back. "I was the Sheep's leader. But all I was given were my friend's anxieties and the reliance of the group. At this point, I'm not that upset about joining your organization and obeying your orders. But can you tell me one thing? What does it mean to be a leader?"

At the boy's serious gaze, Mori's smile abruptly disappeared.

He closed his eyes, then opened them again. Then, with a genuine look that nobody had ever seen before, said,

"The leader stands at the top of the organization, but is also its slave. For the profit and survival of the organization, I will gladly soak in all its filth. Raise my subordinates, position them optimally, and if I need to, use and throw them away. I will gladly do any inhumane act if it's for the organization. That's what it means to be a leader."

Mori shifted his gaze to look out the window at the various cityscapes.

"All to protect this beloved city."

Chuuya listened with clear eyes. He had an expression of innocence on his face, like he was reborn.

"That's ... what I was missing."

Chuuya hung his head as he dropped down to one knee. And with a soldier's sharp,

commanding voice, he said,

"In that case, I will devote all this blood to you, boss. I will protect this organization that you support as your slave, crush your enemies as your slave, and let those who undermine the Port Mafia know how it feels to be crushed by gravity."

1. Chuuya's Vulnerability

Chuuya is shown reflecting on his experiences as the leader of the Sheep, where he felt burdened by the anxieties and expectations of his peers. This reflection leaves him open to influence, as he seeks guidance on what it means to be a true leader. Mori seizes this moment of vulnerability to instill his philosophy of leadership, shaping Chuuya’s perspective.

2. Mori's Philosophy of Leadership

Mori’s response is chilling and pragmatic, emphasizing his willingness to embrace inhumanity for the sake of the organization. He paints leadership as both an immense responsibility and a position of ultimate servitude to the group. This resonates with Chuuya, who, as a former leader of the Sheep, realizes what he lacked in his own leadership—unwavering commitment to the survival and benefit of the group, no matter the personal or moral cost.

3. Chuuya’s Transformation

Mori’s words spark a rebirth in Chuuya’s identity. He internalizes this philosophy and pledges absolute loyalty to Mori and the Port Mafia. The imagery of Chuuya kneeling and vowing to be Mori’s "slave" is both powerful and tragic, signifying his acceptance of a life of servitude and violence in exchange for the purpose and structure that the Port Mafia offers.

4. Themes of Manipulation and Control

This scene also underscores Mori’s skillful manipulation. He doesn’t coerce Chuuya with threats or force this time but rather appeals to Chuuya’s need for direction and understanding. By presenting his own harsh worldview as the "truth" of leadership, Mori binds Chuuya to him ideologically and emotionally.

5. A Tragic Bond

While Chuuya’s devotion to the Port Mafia and Mori is admirable in its intensity, it’s also rooted in the toxic dynamics of the organization. Mori’s definition of leadership is deeply self-serving—it positions him as indispensable while justifying any cruelty or sacrifice in the name of the Port Mafia’s survival. For Chuuya, embracing this philosophy means willingly giving up a part of his humanity.

Conclusion

This moment cements the unequal power dynamic between Mori and Chuuya. Mori takes advantage of Chuuya’s vulnerability and longing for guidance, molding him into a loyal subordinate. While Chuuya believes he has found purpose, it is within the confines of a system that exploits his strength and loyalty. The scene poignantly reflects the series’ recurring themes of power, loyalty, and the sacrifices required to survive in a harsh world.

Could Mori Be Connected to Chūya’s Experimentation?

One of the critical elements of Chuuya Nakahara’s backstory is his suffering due to experimentation at the hands of the organization that created Arahabaki. However, there is no evidence in the canon to suggest that Mori Ōgai was directly involved in these experiments. The timeline of events and Mori’s role within the Port Mafia do not align with the actions of the researchers who experimented on Chuuya.

The experimentation on Chuuya is tied to a separate scientific group that sought to control and weaponize his connection to Arahabaki. By the time Chūya joins the Port Mafia, Mori’s primary focus is on integrating him into the organization as an asset. Mori’s interest in Chuuya begins after these events, positioning him as a manipulative leader rather than a scientist or direct perpetrator of Chuuya’s past suffering.

This distinction is important because it reinforces Mori’s role as an opportunist who capitalizes on Chuuya’s existing trauma and abilities rather than creating them. His lack of involvement in the experimentation also shifts the focus to how Mori uses Chuuya’s power within the Port Mafia rather than how he came to possess it. Thus, while Mori’s treatment of Chūya is morally questionable, it is not rooted in the direct exploitation of Chuuya’s origins.

Does Mori Care About Chuuya?

The question of whether Mori cares about Chuuya is complex, as Mori’s actions are often guided by pragmatism rather than overt emotional connections. However, there is evidence to suggest that Mori’s interest in Chuuya extends beyond mere utility. As a leader, Mori values Chuuya’s loyalty and recognizes his significance not only as a powerful ability user but also as a steadfast member of the Port Mafia.

Mori’s form of care is rooted in his strategic mindset. For example, he ensures that Chuuya’s abilities are honed and that his position in the organization remains secure. While these actions serve the interests of the Port Mafia, they also indicate a level of investment in Chuuya’s well-being and stability. Mori’s decision to rely on Chuuya during critical moments further demonstrates his trust in Chuuya’s capabilities, which could be interpreted as a subtle form of respect.

However, Mori’s care is not altruistic. It is shaped by the Port Mafia’s hierarchical structure and Mori’s overarching goal of maintaining power. This dynamic complicates their relationship, as Chuuya may recognize Mori’s manipulative tendencies while also benefiting from the structure and support that Mori provides.

Fifteen: Chuuya’s Entry into the Port Mafia

In the prequel novel Fifteen, Chuuya’s entry into the Port Mafia is portrayed as a reluctant decision made under duress. Chuuya joins not out of a desire for power or belonging, but to save the lives of the Sheep—a group he had considered family until their betrayal. While Chuuya primarily blames Dazai for orchestrating the events that led to this decision, it becomes evident that the entire scenario was a calculated move by Mori. Mori recognizes Chuuya’s value, both as a powerful ability user and as someone who could influence Dazai, and he meticulously plans to bring Chuuya into the fold.

Mori’s speech about leadership plays a pivotal role in shaping Chuuya’s perspective. Mori emphasizes that true leadership requires treating everyone, including oneself, as pawns for the greater stability of the organization. Chuuya internalizes this philosophy, contrasting it with his own belief that prioritizing people’s safety above all else led to his betrayal by the Sheep. This moment marks a turning point for Chuuya, as he pledges loyalty to Mori partly because of this newfound purpose and partly because Mori holds critical information about Arahabaki, which remains a mystery central to Chuuyas identity.

Stormbringer: Loyalty Tested and Principles Affirmed

In Stormbringer, Chuuya’s loyalty to the Port Mafia is further explored and tested. Despite discovering that the Flags—a group assigned to support him—were also spying on him, Chuuya remains steadfast in his commitment to the organization. His loyalty is portrayed as a matter of principle rather than emotional attachment. When a detective offers Chuuya a chance to betray the Port Mafia, Chuuya’s refusal is definitive and unapologetic. His response is not driven by blind allegiance but by his personal code of honor—he swore loyalty, and he will not break that promise.

Chuuya’s loyalty to the people within the Port Mafia, however, supersedes his loyalty to the organization itself. This is evident in his actions throughout the novel, as he prioritizes the well-being of his comrades and even extends help to the remaining members of the disbanded Sheep. Despite Mori’s pragmatic philosophy, Chuuya’s core values—his humanity and his care for others—remain unchanged. This dynamic tension between Mori’s utilitarianism and Chūya’s empathy highlights the fundamental differences in their principles.

The ending of Stormbringer is particularly significant in understanding Chuuya’s relationship with Mori. Armed with information about his origins provided by Mori, Chuuya takes steps to uncover the truth about his humanity. Yet, even after learning he was always human, Chuuya reaffirms his loyalty to the Port Mafia, viewing it as his family. Mori’s satisfaction with this outcome underscores his deep understanding of Chuuya’s character and his deliberate efforts to shape Chuuya’s loyalty. By surrounding Chuuya with individuals he could grow to care for, such as the Flags, Dazai, and Kouyou, Mori ensures Chuuya’s integration into the organization is as emotional as it is strategic.

Present-Day Chuuya: A Complex Leader

The Chūya we encounter in the main storyline of Bungou Stray Dogs is markedly different from his younger self. The events that shaped him into the person he is today remain largely unexplored, but his demeanor is more cynical and guarded. He openly critiques Dazai’s moral posturing and questions the naivety of the Armed Detective Agency, suggesting a disillusionment with idealistic views of morality.

Chuuya’s current relationships within the Port Mafia are more formal and distant compared to the bonds he shared with the Flags. While he treats his subordinates with respect and compassion, his deep emotional connections seem muted. This shift hints at significant experiences that led to his increased wariness and self-reliance. Despite this, moments of vulnerability—such as his grief over subordinates lost to Q’s abilities—reveal that his capacity for care has not diminished, even if it is more cautiously expressed.

One of the most telling moments in the manga occurs during Chuuya’s confrontation with Dazai. Dazai’s suggestion that Chuuya’s loyalty to the Port Mafia might be questioned speaks volumes about Chuuya’s precarious position within the organization. Chuuya does not argue against this implication, acknowledging that his loyalty has always been to the people rather than the organization itself. This distinction becomes apparent when Chuuya provides Dazai with critical information and allows him to proceed with his plans, prioritizing personal principles over organizational directives.

Chuuya’s Reflections on Dazai’s Betrayal

One of the most fascinating aspects of Chuuya’s character is his likely perspective on Dazai’s betrayal of the Port Mafia. Dazai’s departure wasn’t simply a rejection of the organization—it was a direct response to Mori’s ruthless decision to sacrifice Oda Sakunosuke for a piece of paper. For Chuuya, who places immense value on people over principles, it’s not difficult to imagine that he could piece together the reasoning behind Dazai’s actions. This raises the question: why does Chuuya remain by Mori’s side despite everything?

It’s possible that Chuuya stayed because he believed he could mitigate Mori’s more destructive tendencies from within. Perhaps he thought that by remaining loyal, he could protect people from Mori’s calculated ruthlessness. Alternatively, Mori might have justified his actions to Chuuya, convincing him that the sacrifice was necessary for the greater good of the Port Mafia. Given Chuuya’s principled nature, however, it’s unlikely that he would accept such reasoning without significant inner conflict.

Why Mori Wouldn’t Lie to Chuuya

While it is tempting to consider the possibility that Mori lied to Chuuya to secure his loyalty, this theory doesn’t align with Mori’s established character or leadership style. Mori Ōgai is an opportunist and a strategist, but he is also pragmatic. He understands that trust, even a wary and conditional kind, is essential for maintaining control over individuals as powerful as Chuuya. A lie, if discovered, would jeopardize Chuuya’s loyalty and potentially incite rebellion within the Port Mafia—an outcome Mori would seek to avoid at all costs.

Furthermore, Mori’s speech to Chuuya during his induction into the Port Mafia emphasizes his philosophy of treating everyone, including himself, as a pawn for the greater stability of the organization. This transparency, however cold and calculating, establishes a baseline of honesty in Mori’s dealings with Chuuya. It’s far more likely that Mori framed his decisions in a way that appealed to Chuuya’s sense of duty and responsibility, rather than resorting to outright falsehoods.

Chuuya’s True Loyalties

Ultimately, Chuuya’s loyalty to the Port Mafia is not about the organization itself. His commitment lies with the people within it—those he considers his subordinates, friends, and comrades. This distinction is crucial when writing Chuuya, as it underscores his fundamental conflict with Mori’s leadership. Chuuya values humanity and connection, while Mori views individuals as tools to be used for the collective good. This ideological divide creates a tension that defines their relationship and shapes Chuuya’s actions within the narrative.

Chuuya’s principles are a driving force behind his character. Despite Mori’s manipulations, Chuuya remains steadfast in his commitment to the people he cares about. This focus on personal loyalty over institutional allegiance makes him a compelling and multi-dimensional figure, one whose choices continue to intrigue and inspire deeper exploration of his character.

Thank you for reading. Having said that,

TOODLES!!!!!!!!!

[percheduphere]

LET'S TALK ABOUT THE LOKI SERIES' ROMANTIC TROPES AND JANE AUSTEN

I am going to compare the relationships and romantic undertones of Loki, Sylvie, and Mobius with my all-time favorite Jane Austen adaptation because the character archetypes and plot-points are strikingly similar with Ang Lee and Emma Thompson's 1995 Sense and Sensibility.

This sounds cracked, but stay with me. Tropes are tropes for a reason. They are often repeated in writing subconsciously because they are very old and near-universal story arcs regardless of the literary genre we are discussing.

Please note that this is not a 1-to-1 comparison. This is an analysis of basic archetypes, tropes, and plot-points: the barebones skeleton of story structure. With that said, let's dig in:

Loki = Kate Winslet's Marianne Dashwood

Sylvie = Greg Wise's John Willoughby

Mobius = Alan Rickman's Colonel Brandon

For those of you who have not seen (or read) Sense & Sensibility, the story is about a family of women who are rendered near-destitute when the patriarch passes away and, due to English law at the time, all the family finances fall to the only son. The only hope for the women to escape the edges of poverty is to marry into wealth.  

The Loki series’ main storyline is a far cry from that of Sense & Sensibility. It is first and foremost a sci-fi action-adventure, but don’t let that genre fool you. Well-written stories are always character-driven. The setting serves to establish the rules of the world and the tangible challenges the characters must confront to achieve their goal. The end goal for Loki is his ascension to the God of Stories (and time). Therefore, his character arc must follow a trajectory that prepares him for that ascension.  

Love, above all else, is essential for Loki’s journey. In order to understand and be capable of love, Loki must experience love in all its forms including but not limited to romantic. I've seen a lot of social media posters mocking shippers with comments saying, "the story is not about romance." I wholeheartedly disagree. While romance is not the main concern of the series, romance does serve Loki's character development.

It is critical that we remember romance does not require physical contact or even blatant declarations of love. If that were true, unrequited love would not be thought of as romantic, which we know is not the case. Further, it is possible for physical intimacy to exist without any romance at all. One does not require the other.

While dismantling HWR’s old regime is the Loki series’ “Plot A” thread, Loki’s emotional experience serves as the series’ “Plot B” thread. Love and romance exist in Plot B.

THE CHARACTERS & THEIR ARCHETYPES 

LOKI & MARIANNE 

Within Sense & Sensibility’s plot, one of the main heroines, Marianne, has the archetype of the mercurial, passionate, and freewheeling spirit. She is rebellious at heart, chaffing at society’s rigid expectations of emotional repression and polite rather than fiery courtship. Much like Loki with Sylvie, Marianne is drawn to John Willoughby because his temperament, values, interests, and talents very closely mirror her own.  

Like Loki, Marianne is emotional. Her emotions drive many of her decisions, some of which are rash and socially unacceptable for her era. 

Like Loki, Marianne detests social norms. Refusing to contain her nature for anyone, she is unafraid of the stares and judgment of others. 

Like Loki, Marianne is poetic, a lover of words and metaphor. 

Like Loki, Marianne is a hedonist. She will follow where her heart takes her regardless of the consequences. Just as Loki runs after Sylvie through the portal door, Marianne chases after Willoughby.

SYLVIE & WILLOUGHBY 

Willoughby fulfills the archetype of the ideal lover at first sight. He is young, handsome, strong, deeply romantic, and a lover of poetry, pleasure, and unfettered emotion. I will not go into the deeper details of his character and plot here as I don't find them relevant for the purposes of this analysis. The key point to remember is that Willoughby is meant to be Marianne's perfect match by virtue of similarity.

Like Sylvie, Willoughby is emotional and consequently chaotic in nature. At his worst, Willoughby is unafraid of hurting others in the pursuit of his desires. 

Like Sylvie, Willoughby chooses absolute freedom over the genuine love and care he has for Marianne (Loki).  

Like Sylvie, Willoughby views institutions with social authority with contempt.  

Like Sylvie, Willoughby judges character based on association with institutions rather than the individuals themselves. He holds repugnance for Brandon’s (Mobius’s) association with the military (the TVA). Fair enough, both the TVA and the military (especially the British military) are institutions that have committed horrific global atrocities.  

Like Sylvie, Willoughby is unable to separate the institution from the individual people living and working within it, who are capable of goodness.  

MOBIUS & COLONEL BRANDON 

Colonel Brandon, a decorated military officer, fulfills the trope of the “dark horse” in love. He is Willoughby’s opposite: older, "less physically attractive", reserved, practical, and orderly. The main character (Loki/Marianne) appreciates his friendship yet does not feel any romantic affection for him (Mobius/Brandon) until the primary love interest (Sylvie/Willoughby) abandons the relationship for absolute freedom.  

Like Mobius, Brandon is drawn to intelligent, artistic, footloose nonconformists. 

Like Mobius, Brandon accepts and loves Marianne exactly as she is, including her faults. He does not want her to change against her will and gently reprimands her older sister, Elinor, at such a suggestion.

Like Mobius, Brandon serves an institution with significant influence on the lives of others. 

Like Mobius, Brandon accepts that his love is not returned yet continues to express his love through his support of Marianne’s (Loki's) wishes, including his romantic rival Willoughby (Sylvie). 

Like Mobius, Brandon is seen as a dear friend rather than a potential romantic partner in the first 2/3rds of the story. 

Like Mobius, Brandon’s personal desires are secondary to Marianne’s (Loki’s) happiness. 

THE ROMANTIC PLOT 

It is understood by the audience that love is not only a feeling; it is also an action that requires incredible responsibility. In that responsibility, both lovers must choose to take into consideration the feelings, wants, and needs of the other.

The trope of a main character meeting their perfect match and falling quickly in love informs the audience that conflict must lie ahead, and that the third party of the love triangle will be tested for their worthiness as a romantic partner.

Loki & Sylvie and Marianne & Willoughby possess a fast, passionate, and explosive love.

Loki & Mobius and Marianne & Brandon posses a slow, steady, and gently burning love.

These two relationships, which are BOTH valid AND romantic, are set against one another to contrast each suitor's strengths and weaknesses, as well as to shed light on which suitor best meets the feelings, needs, and wants of the main character.

The main character's (Loki/Marianne) love interests inevitably collide in a tense confrontation. Being the Georgian Era, Brandon and Willoughby do not discuss their dislike for one another directly but with Marianne's older sister, Elinor.

Sylvie, on other hand, is not afraid to tear into Mobius, saying exactly what she thinks of him. Both directors of photography frame their shots in a near-identical fashion, demonstrating who are at odds and the individual (present or not) who is between them.

Whether in the realm of fiction or reality, the act of love inherently requires some degree of self-sacrifice.

While Sylvie performs self-sacrifice by pruning herself in hopes of finding and rescuing Loki from the Void, that self-sacrifice does not extend to her personal values and beliefs with respect to free will.  She therefore fights Loki, ultimately kissing him farewell before kicking him through a time door to get what she wants.

Likewise, Willoughby, cut-off from his family's estate due to indiscretions he refuses own, prioritizes wealth over his relationship with Marianne in order to continue his lifestyle of luxury and absolute freedom. Willoughby therefore marries the exceptionally wealthy Miss Grey to achieve this end, abandoning Marianne and breaking her heart in the process.

At the midpoint of each storyline (where the narrative turns), both Loki and Marianne have lost the person they felt most strongly about because they were not that's person's priority.

Marianne's quote in the above gif is significant. It is a poem she and Willoughby recited together when they first met. She recites it again, alone, as she looks upon the estate Willoughby has married into in the rain. The poem is as follows:

"Love is not love which alters when it alteration finds, or bends with the remover to remove. Oh, no. It is an ever-fixed mark that looks upon tempests and is never shaken."

This poem defines love as not fickle but persistent in the face of challenges and "never shaken".

THE DARK HORSE IN LOVE

Brandon, who falls for Marianne first, establishes himself as not only a friend of Marianne's but her whole family's. All of his actions throughout the film are performed out of love for Marianne, but these actions are not read as romantic by Marianne because there is no fast-burning fire and (seemingly) little commonality between them.

Marianne's mother cautions her, pointing out that the romances she cites all meet pitiful ends. In return, Marianne describes such love as not pitiful but "glorious."

Brandon and Mobius express their love for Marianne and Loki through practical means. Their actions are predominantly viewed as marks of friendship rather than marks of romantic love. It should be noted that in both cases, no verbal declaration of love, nor any physical declaration of love, such as a kiss, is ever made by either Mobius or Brandon on screen. Brandon's unrequited love, however, is readily apparent to everyone (the characters and the audience) due his presentation of the opposite gender.

Brandon, upon seeing Marianne struggle cutting reeds for weaving, offers her his pocketknife. Mobius, knowing that confrontation with Sylvie at Roxxcart will be dangerous, offers Loki his daggers for protection. 

Brandon, recognizing Marianne’s need for artistic pursuits, gifts her a piano. Mobius, recognizing Loki’s need for validation, provides him with words of affirmation, encouraging Loki’s talents in magic and cunning.

Brandon, acknowledging Marianne’s love for Willoughby, invites Willoughby to a picnic at his estate despite his distaste for him.  Mobius, acknowledging Loki’s love for Sylvie, frees Loki and is pruned despite his jealousy of her. 

Marianne, out in the rain and in distress over her loss of Willoughby, succumbs to a deadly fever. Loki, kicked through a time door and in distress over his loss of Sylvie, succumbs to time-slipping.

Brandon and Mobius actively make themselves available in response to their loved one's individual break-ups with ZERO expectation of having their love returned.

Brandon, concerned that Marianne's illness may kill her, rides nonstop for hours to retrieve her mother during a storm. Mobius, concerned for Loki's wellbeing, risks his life on the loom's gangway, risking exposure to temporal radiation and death.

In the end, both Brandon and Mobius are the triumphant winners of Marianne's and Loki's hearts.

Indeed, Brandon reads poetry to Marianne, and when he announces he must "away", Marianne worriedly asks "where?", demonstrating her desire for him to stay. Brandon teases her, fulfilling Marianne's need for romance and excitement by saying, "it is a secret."

Mobius, meanwhile, begins to open himself up to worldly pleasures, allowing himself to drop the strict, no-nonsense behavior he exhibited in S1. Loki, in turn, begins to provide him with the type of emotional support Mobius has consistently given him since the beginning (yes, he has a jealous meltdown, but he recovers relatively quickly).

The outcome of their successes, however, diverge due to their gender presentation.

Whereas Brandon happily marries Marianne ...

... Loki returns Mobius's selfless love with a sacrifice of his own, and they are separated.

[neverfilth]

The Hymentacts and Dysfunctional Family Roles

Analysis below the cut

Before we dive deeper into this in relation to the Hymentacts, let's first explain what these roles are and what they represent within the inner workings of the Family system. 

For this post I’m going to cover a triangular set of roles that coincide with one another and form an unhealthy dynamic amongst the family members within them. 

The Golden Child:

The child who is often favored and receives special treatment and praise from the parent. They may also suffer from the weight of high expectations and a need to succeed out of a fear of losing their position as the family favorite. They are expected to excel at and achieve what the parent demands of them and may often be a proxy for achievements the parent failed to act on in their own childhood or adult lives.

The Invisible Child:

The child who is unacknowledged and undervalued by their parent. They are often ignored or dismissed and often feel as if they don't exist at all in the eyes of those around them. The invisible child may often be regarded by the offending parent as not suitable to fill the needs deemed important or may not fit into the role they require of them. 

The invisible child often becomes used to the idea of being unseen, and this will persist in areas outside the home. Often, this child will have difficulty developing socially. 

The Scapegoat:

The punching bag of the family, and is used as a meaning of blame in place of legitimate issues. Can be seen as a “problem child” or “trouble maker.” They could also be the member of the family who is verbalizing or acting out against the problems the family is trying to deny or conceal. 

Notably, the Hymentact family is missing one of the three common roles within their children, the scapegoat.

But interestingly, it seems that Raymond could have filled this role but from a parental side. 

It is also possible for Modella to become the scapegoat after Lunchbox takes her place as the golden child, but there isn't enough information to speculate further without delving into full-blown headcanon territory. 

So, what role does each respective member of the family fit into?

The Dysfunctional Parent-

Though there are many different forms of parenting that can lead to a dysfunctional family system. In this case our offender is possessive, critical, and controlling of their children. They are more concerned with what their children can supply to them, seem to fear their children becoming independent, and will go to extremes to prevent this from happening.

In the small glimpse we see of Mrs. Hymentact, it's very clear that she runs her home in a very rigid and demanding way. Even in the set dressing we see just how controlling she is, as the furniture is covered in sterile plastics. No doubt in an attempt to keep an outward appearance of a pristine and perfect household with no room for flaws. It reflects her need to hold control over not only the home but also her rigid family mold and by extension her own appearance. Those who do not fit into her vision of the perfect Family are cast aside and ignored; in the case of Bloberta. Or if they do not comply with her demands they are beaten down emotionally until they do so; in the case of Raymond.

Which brings us to the second parent within the system.

The Enabler-

The enabler is the co-parent of the dysfunctional parent and can have many different forms. In the case of Raymond, the enabling is far more passive. He does not gaslight his children or back up his wife and even speaks out against her in some small cases, though only in short quips that are quickly backtracked upon. In ways he is an ally, but only a superficial one. However, in the long run this does not matter because he is unable to take a stand against his wife and instead allows everything to unfold around him. Allowing the cycle of abuse to continue, and letting the dysfunctional parent rule the roost.

Raymond could also be considered the scapegoat, but over time, he becomes a beaten down blend of both roles. His opinions are not valued, and he simply goes along with what his wife says instead, choosing to numb himself as an easier alternative to fighting back.

The Golden Child-

For the Hymentact's the golden child is an interesting role, because when we see things unfold it seems as if both Modella and Lunchbox fill this spot.

The interesting thing about that is that they can potentially represent two different paths of the role as they come into adulthood.

Modella is the one easiest to place into the role due to her being the most talented in the family choir. Her mother sings her praises in order to tear down Bloberta when she tries to include herself in the family's activities.

She is essentially weaponized and used against her simply by existing, though we are never able to see her own inner opinions of her sister.

But with Modella, there is hope. She doesn't actively chide or berate her sister, but she does defend herself, and we see her perk up when her mother compliments her.

To Modella, her position can be seen as extremely tenuous in her eyes, especially with Lunchbox in the picture. So, there is more need for her to protect that position on the pedestal her mother has placed her on.

I can see Modella fitting more into the category of a guilt ridden golden child. The kind that still holds empathy for their siblings and growing into adulthood would try to find a way to mend the rift that was formed between them.

Now, with Lunchbox, there is a distinct difference in how he behaves compared to Modella. There is, of course, a stark age difference between the two, so there is a gap of maturity, but we do see him delight in his sister's exclusion. Already, we see Lunchbox being praised for simply existing.

Is he as talented as Modella? We really don't know the answer, but my guess is that no. He is not.

But even still, Lunchbox is being set up to be the new golden child, but this time, it is simply on the merit of his gender.

This should not be a surprise in a town with such dated culture as Moralton. Lunchbox is Mrs. Hymentacts first son, and therefore his value is automatically higher than both of her daughters.

No matter how talented Modella is, she has no chance to compete with Lunchbox and the talent that was cultivated by her family suddenly becomes less valuable. Though unlike Bloberta she isn't ostracized and ignored because she still has that pedigree that her mother can make use of.

Into adulthood I imagine Lunchbox growing into the more toxic flavor of the golden child. The kind that buys into the excessive validation and hype of the offending parent, and truly believes that they are better than everyone else.

So between him and Modella the two would mature into very different sides of the golden child's hypothetical paths.

The Invisible Child-

This then brings us to Bloberta, who fills the role of the invisible child. Bloberta is not hated enough to be a scapegoat, she is instead treated as if she doesn't exist. In her mother's eyes she holds little value. So little, in fact, that she is barely acknowledged.

When Bloberta chimes into her family's singing, her mother doesn't even register the thought that it could be her. Instead, she chides Modella despite the high praise she has for her. Bloberta simply doesn't register as a part of her mother's world until she speaks up.

“Um, mom, that was me singing… Along with the family.”

Now she can be recognized, if only for a moment, but only to be brought down and further relegated into her role.

“Really, Bloberta, you know we don't need two Sopranos, and your older sister has perfect pitch.”

Here we see a small glimpse into her mother's thought process. Bloberta is redundant when compared to her sister, and is seen as less talented in her eyes. But in reality it is far more likely that Bloberta’s talents were simply not given the attention they needed to develop properly. Which is common with invisible children. They are not given the notice they need to develop socially and within their interests.

So, she continues to relegate herself to the background. Though she still tries to make attempts to be seen, it seems as though they fall on deaf ears.

Unseen and unheard by all but one person, her father.

This leads to a fragile connection between the two. Where their presence makes the other feel more validated.

From Raymond’s perspective he is able to make some sort of conscious effort towards making Bloberta feel seen but he will never do anything to change what is happening within the family as he himself is not valued and does not have the courage to stand against the toxicity of his wife's actions.

So even though their situation remains in limbo, Bloberta feels seen and valued thanks to his presence, but even that is fleeting.

Emotionally, he is still distant, closed off, and unable to provide the affection she craves that will allow her to feel truly emotionally validated. He can't even reciprocate the affirmations of her love towards him. He doesn't even acknowledge them.

“Okay… I'll shut back up.”

So still, she suffers socially and is unable to form any genuine connections that go deeper than surface level even with the family member she sees herself as closest to. 

Though we know there is one significant trait that she learned to mirror from her Father. 

We have no clue how early she started drinking, but this could've been somewhere in  her early early teens as a form of mirroring the emotional capacity of the parent who did notice her. 

The one parent she felt she had a valid connection to.

Turning to some form of unhealthy coping is not uncommon in invisible children, and it can go as far as being a cry for attention to become more noticed by their family. 

An invisible child may be at risk of being unseen even into their adult life, and in Bloberta's case, this is true as well. 

We see her being obsessed with the concept of being helpful, but even that can be seen as a way to gain the usefulness that was built up as so important in her home and that she so distinctly lacked. There are societal aspects to this side of her character as well, but the two coincide. 

In adult life, she put herself into a situation where, similarly to her childhood, she is undervalued and unseen. 

From the beginning, she may have even noticed the signs of that, but simply didn't see them as strange due to what she experienced in her homelife. 

In order to circumvent this, we see her fully occupy herself with things that are deemed useful in her role, in another outward attempt to gain favor and become seen. Though these cries, similarly to the ones of her childhood, go unnoticed by many around her. 

She is essentially a ghost within her home, as if nothing has changed.

So she seeks validation elsewhere, and eventually, she receives it. But in the end, that too is superficial and results in a cycle that anoints a new lost child.

Though the factors that cause Bloberta to relegate Shapey into this role are different than those of her mother, Bloberta is repeating the neglect that she experienced with her own son. 

Be it because she was never able to fully grow socially and emotionally, or if she sees him as a reminder of a loveless affair. 

Either way, she has perpetuated the cycle and put her child on a path not dissimilar from her own. 

But there is still time to break that cycle, and allow his voice to be heard…

[puckpocketed]

Hello. You might have seen this floating around on twt:

link 1 // link 2, archive link

If by any chance you or someone you know are thinking about joining in on the challenge… no one can stop you but I implore you as someone who makes art, as someone with friends in an often-exploited creative industry, as someone who lives in late stage capitalism alongside you and has seen this play out before: proceed with caution.

Read the fine print on that form. There is NO guarantee of an internship, much less a job at the end of it. I haven't gone further than this form, but if anyone reading this does, and if there's no written agreement that your work won't be used without credit to you + payment for services rendered - RUN.

This is a common corporate tactic to get free labor out of people. I'm not saying this is necessarily what’s happening; for all we know this was done as a completely innocent move to drum up some fan engagement and as a genuine search for talent for their analytics team. WHO KNOWS. But I can't ignore that I’ve seen this situation play out again and again, at every scale.

Job interviews, when they ask you how YOU think they should improve their systems, how YOU would solve their problems? When they require that you do some problem-solving for them, and it goes beyond a simple task? That’s a free consultation you’re giving them, that's free work you or someone else should be getting paid for.

When big streamers/influencers ask their fans to join in on a fan art contest to choose their new pfp/banner? That’s hundreds, possibly thousands of pieces of free art they never would’ve gotten otherwise. They could've gone to the trouble of paying someone in-house to do it, hiring someone for that position, commissioning a professional for a piece. It's free work from their dedicated fans.

In this case, Utah HC is asking fans to not only choose/provide their own dataset, but to do a complex analysis on it AND do the work of visual and verbal communication to senior management, who likely do not have a deeper grasp of the concepts and will need it simplified. The stipulation that you will present your work could be ANYTHING!! The "five page deliverable" is already bananas to me, having dipped my toe into what analytics is and how complex the fun ones are. Condensing it all is WORK. The presentation portion may include speaking time and answering questions; the groundwork for doing this effectively may include producing data visualisations, making spreadsheets, time consuming write-ups. Maths and science communication is hard. It is WORK. They are asking for free labor.

Many have already called it out, but it's still gaining traction via retweets from big accounts uncritically sharing it. I found out through the official Puckpedia account. Jack Han called it out pretty eloquently on twitter and on his substack:

Many people aspire to work as an analyst in the NHL. Earlier today the Utah Hockey Club gave those people a glimmer of hope. Utah’s Summer Analytics Challenge is unusual in that it doesn’t provide a dataset or detailed instructions. The open-ended contests contrasts with other public (ex: Big Data Cup) or private (ex: NHL team interview) events. In those scenarios, participants are given proprietary data to clean, model and analyze, which influence direction and methodology. Meanwhile, Utah is seemingly happy with anything as long as the writeup is under five pages long. Utah’s contest also stands out in its near-total absence of legal fine print. There are no mention of intellectual property implications, which is perhaps fitting when the team is asking participants to bring their own data and analysis. [...] Open casting calls such as Utah’s analytics challenge start out as a lose-lose-lose proposition: > The employer loses because it will have to invest massive human resources to trawl/filter/evaluate/reverse-engineer the hundreds of write-ups it is sure to receive, with no guarantee that any of them will be of use > Applicants lose because the vast, vast majority of them will have nothing to show for their efforts, while a tiny minority risks having its IP stolen > Good ideas lose because they’ll be born into an environment where their parents (the applicant & the employer) have no defined relationship and won’t be in a position to grow together

link, archive link

I do try to keep things light on this blog, but this is super personal for me <3 thank u for listening

[dykedvonte]

people act like wanting to discuss how anya being male would affect the story/the themes erases the actual game from existence, like is gone or somehow cheapened by fans doing what fans do

i think you don't like those (happy) ending baby aus and neither do i but it kind of feels similar where the exploration of possibilites is discouraged entirely or considered disrespectful towards the source material or a sign that the fans don't understand the original message which is such a weird viewpoint to have

especially because i think the game lends itself to these kind of conversations/fan content... bc yeah while it wouldn't be the same if anya was male, but that doesn't mean you can't use a male anya au to criticize the patriarchy/rape culture? it would maybe help some people to look deeper into an au like that especially bc it would require THEM to use their brain and maybe confront their own biases

It’s like a ridiculous thing to be so upset about in my mind because it comes from a place I keep seeing in this particular fan space of people interpretaing personal views as like canon analysis.

It’s a game that deals with multiple sensitive topics on a lot of different fronts and of course a lot of the fans are going to go about engaging with it in different ways. Too many people are getting mad at others for depicting things in ways they don’t like even if it comes from a place of personal experience with the subject matter or other real life lived experiences.

I don’t like the idea that Anya has to keep the baby but it’s not unheard of that victims end up having to and it’s not evil or missing the point to admit that or explore it through an au. It’s not happy nor do I think it’s a post canon fix it like some are deposited as but from what I’ve seen of them I’ve only gotten ones that are real and upsetting and deal with the stress of having to care for your rapist child. Again, the concept of Jimmy refusing to take responsibility and forcing it on to others even when they shouldn’t have to.

With the idea of male Anya and female Jimmy the conversation of autonomy, patriarchy, sexism, misogyny and rape culture can still very much happen. It is a lot more nuanced and muddied just due to how male victims are addressed, if addressed at all, but to think it disregard the points of the game means you have a shallow understanding of all of the themes at play in tandem. The idea it’d affect his life less completely misses the point he would feel a shame and guilt about being assaulted by a woman but it fostering a child. Many people in real scenarios would assume he’s only saying it wasn’t consensual because he doesn’t want the kid despite discomfort and fear around Jimmy. Theres the idea that Jimmy would guilt him to care for the baby and thus her back on earth which furthers the idea of being stuck with you abuser along with how Anya may be compliant because men who defend themselves are still seen at fault. If everyone’s gender is swapped it opens the discussion of how women can be complacent in n rape culture too.

I think a sign of a good piece of media is if enables transformative conversation on the subject matter. I think the issue people are having is not understanding that there isn’t one right way to act in the scenarios we were given, that victims find themselves in. It’s a lot of people getting upset at others who react differently and acting like putting those opinions out there is damaging when it’s just another real perspective someone is either opening up and sharing or trying to depict.

[hauntingofhouses]

i know I've mentioned my interpretation of mizu's gender a million times on here but i don't think i ever fully elaborated on it.

so on that note i just wanna ramble about that for a bit. basically, it's my reading of the show that mizu is nonbinary, so let me dig into that.

putting the rest under the cut because it ended up being pretty long lol. also here have a cute mizu pic of her being happy and most at ease with herself, symbolised by her letting her hair down. <3 ok let's proceed.

thus, when i refer to mizu as nonbinary, i am interpreting mizu as a woman, but not ONLY a woman. not strictly a woman. she is also a man. she is also neither of these things, she is something in between, while at the same time she is none of these at all. i've said as much many times, but i just don't want people to think that when i say nonbinary, it inherently means a "third androgynous gender" that essentially turns the gender binary into a gender trinary. not only is that going against what the term nonbinary was crafted for (to go against rigid boxes and categorisation of gender identities), but also, not all nonbinary people fall under that category or definition, and that's definitely not the way i interpret mizu.

okay before i go deeper i'd just like to address some important things. first of all, this post is an analysis of canon, and thus everything i am arguing for is about my own interpretation of the show, and not some baseless projected headcanon i am projecting onto the character. please remember there is a difference between an interpretation (subjective; interpretations will differ from viewer to viewer, but ultimately it is firmly rooted in evidence taken from the source material) VS a headcanon (unrelated and often even contrary to what is presented in canon; opinions wildly differ and they cannot be argued for because there is no canonical evidence to back it up).

ALSO please note that nonbinary is an umbrella term. this means that it applies to a vast range of gender identities. other identities that fall under the nonbinary umbrella include agender, bigender, genderfluid, and so on. however, it's my personal preference to use the term nonbinary as it is, simply because i'm not a fan of microlabels (more power to you if you do like them and find they suit you more though!).

also, before anyone fights me on this, let me clarify further that gender means something different to everyone. it's not your biological sex or physical characteristics. but at the same time, gender is not mere presentation. you can be a trans woman and still present masculine—either because you're closeted and forced to, or because you just want to—and either way, that doesn't take away from your identity as a woman. same goes for trans men. if you're a trans man but you wear skirts and don't bind or don't get top surgery, that doesn't make you any less of a man. because gender non-conformity exists, and does not only apply to cis people! some lesbians are nonbinary and prefer using he/him pronouns while dressing masculinely, but that doesn't mean they're a man, or that they're any less of a lesbian. neither does this mean that they're a cis woman.

the thing about queer identities in general is that, like i said, they mean something different to everyone, because how you identify—regardless of your biological attributes and fashion or pronouns—is an extremely personal experience. so a nonbinary person and a gnc cis woman's experiences might have plenty of overlap, but what distinguishes between the two is up to the individual. there's no set requirements to distinguish you as one or the other, but it's up to you to decide what you identify as, based on what you feel. either way, by simply identifying yourself as anything under the LGBTQ+ umbrella, you are already communicating to the world that you are not what a conservative, cisheteronormative society wants you to be.

which is why i find all this queer infighting on labels to be so ridiculous. because we're all fighting the same fight; the common enemy is a societal structure that divides us into set roles and expectations purely based on our biological parts. that's why biological essentialism in the queer community is a fucking disease. because by arguing that women are inherently weak and fragile and soft and gentle and must be protected from evil ugly men, while men are inherently strong and angry and violent and exploitative of women, these people are advocating for the same fucked up system that marginalises and abuses women as well as effeminate and/or gay men.

anyway. i'm going on a tangent. this was meant to be a blue eye samurai post. so yeah back to that— the point i'm trying to make is that there's no singular way to identify as anything, as everyone's views on gender, especially their own, is specific and personal to the individual.

so with that being said, yes you can definitely interpret mizu as a gnc cis woman and that's a totally valid reading of the text. however, interpreting her as nonbinary or transmasc also doesn't take away from her experiences with misogyny and female oppression, because nonbinary and transmasc folks also experience these things.

me, personally, i view her as nonbinary but not necessarily or not always transmasc because i still believe femininity and womanhood is a very inherent part of who mizu is. for example, from what we've seen, she does not like binding. it does not give her gender euphoria, but is instead very uncomfortable for her both physically and mentally, and represents her suppressing her true self. which is why when she "invites the whole" of herself, she stands completely bare in front of the fire, breasts unbound and hair untied. when she is on the ship heading to a new land in the ending scene, she is no longer hiding her neck and the lack of an adam's apple. we can thus infer that mizu does not have body dysmorphia. she is, in fact, comfortable in her body, and relies on it extremely, because her body is a weapon. instead, what mizu hates about herself is her face—her blue eyes. she hates herself for her hybridised racial identity, hates herself for being a racial Other. hates that she has no home in her homeland. thus it is important to note that these are not queer or feminist themes, but postcolonial ones.*

* and as a tiny aside on this subject, i really do wish more of the fandom discussion would talk about this more. it's just such an essential part to reading her character. like someone who's read homi k bhabha's location of culture and has watched this show, PLEASE talk to me so we can ramble all about how the show is all about home and alienation from community. please. okay anyway—

nevertheless, queer and feminist themes (which are not mutually exclusive by the way!) are still prevalent in her story, though they are not the main issue that she is struggling with. but she does struggle with it to some extent, and we see this especially during her marriage with mikio, where we see her struggle in women's domestic spaces.

on the other hand, though, she finds no trouble or discomfort in being a man or being around other men—even naked ones—and does not seem stifled by living as one, does not seem all that bothered or uncomfortable navigating through men's spaces. contrast this to something like disney's mulan (1998), where we do see mulan struggle in navigating through men's spaces, as she feels uncomfortable being around so many men, always feeling like she doesn't belong and that she's inherently different from them. mizu has no such experiences like this, as her very personality and approach to life is what can be categorised as typically "masculine". she is straightforward and blunt. her first meeting with mikio, she tells him straight to his face that he's old while frowning and raising a brow at him. she approaches problems with her muscles and fists (or swords), rather than with her words or mind. compare this with mulan, who, while well-trained by the end of the movie, still uses her sharp wits rather than brute strength. this is a typically "feminine" approach. it's also the approach akemi relies on throughout the show—through her intelligence and persuasive tongue, she navigates the brothel with ease. mizu, in contrast to someone like mulan and akemi, struggles with womanhood and femininity, and feels detached from it.

thus, in my opinion, mizu is not simply a man, nor is she simply a woman. she is both. man and woman. masculine and feminine. she has to accept both, rather than suppress one or the other. her name means water. fluid.

as a side note, while i do believe mizu is nonbinary, i also primarily use she/her pronouns for her, but this is a personal preference. i find it's easier to use in fanfic (singular they is confusing to write stories with, but again, that's just my feelings on it, and this is coming from someone who uses they/they pronouns). i also lean towards she/her because it's what the creators and all the official promotional copywriting of the show uses. and even though i am a "death to the author" enjoyer, i feel that when interpreting things that are left open-ended, it does help to look at the creators' take on things. also because, in general, being nonbinary simply doesn't necessitate the use of they/them pronouns. nonbinary is not just a third gender. it's about breaking the binary, in any which way, and that's exactly what mizu does, constantly.

also, i'd also like to mention that one of show's head of story even referred to her with the term "nonbinary", rather than simply "androgynous" (see pic below). and it's possible this could be a slip up on his part, in which he believes the terms are interchangeable (they're not btw), but regardless i find it a very interesting word choice, and one that supports my argument.

so anyway yeah that's my incredibly long rambling post.

TL;DR nonbinary mizu rights 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻 congrats if you reached the end of this btw. also ily. unless you're a TERF in which case fuck off. ok i'm done.

[zacki0gaming]

My TPC Season 2, Episode 2 Deeper Analysis

Hi everyone! It's finally time to delve deeper into Season 2, Episode 2, and I'll be sharing my theories to support my analysis. Whether my final verdict scores will rise or remain the same determines the depth of analysis required for the TPC episodes. Here's how I'll structure the sections throughout the episode:

Sections

For the sections, I was going to analyze the conversations from Ajaceare/Lycanthropy and Pyrare/Ajacenus, but they don’t seemed that interested to go deeper besides Lycanthropy’s lead and Ajaceare’s pure counterpart, “Ajacent” and the sisters.

The Royal Graveyard.

Iris and Circusic’s Conversation.

1. The Royal Graveyard

Now, let’s analyze the Royal Graveyard. Looking back at this episode, It is so lore heavy… Also, before I start this off, just look how pathetic the entire graveyard’s gate looks… Look at this shit!

This gate looks so underdeveloped in the episode’s making, that it looks so pencil-drawn in which my 4th grade self CAN SIMPLY DRAW THIS SHIT ON PAPER!!! This just further proves my point on the rushed quality of the episode.

Anyway, let’s get started here.

What is the Royal Graveyard?

Well according to Rincle, the Royal Graveyard is a graveyard where all of the spheres who used to be tied to the royal castle passed away. She also said this line “Well, except for the prince" which we could all agree that she is referring to Iris as the prince himself because clearly his parents are the king and queen of the Royal Castle.

However, Rincle never mentions anything about the prince’s parents such as the king from the “Circubit’s Reoccurring Memory” short. If this is the case, than Iris’s father might potentially be dead or maybe not.

Theory about the Royal Graveyard

In a hypothetical scenario, the presence of the corrupted flowers hovering around the Royal Graveyard suggests a level of purpose for them to be over there. The corrupts may be seeking something important over here that might indicate a means to undermine the royal lineage. I also have this to say too that might sound wild. Do you know that the Reaper creature appears to have the ability of Resurrection right?

Well, beyond the gate, I notice a faint pink glow emanating from behind the gravestones, sparking a thought. Could it be that the Reaper creature is situated within the graveyard, utilizing its powers to reanimate the deceased spheres into more undead corrupted shapes such as Circubit.

2. Iris and Circusic’s Conversation

Now, the moment that you all been waiting for, let's analyze the conversation between Iris and Circusic. This is probably was going to be the most important aspect about this episode. But unfortunately, their conversation was pretty obviously abrupt on the surface. How about a deeper look into this might help me try and reveal its true significance.

Initial Tension and Surprise:

Circusic: "Ugh...Huh..?"

Iris: "Finally awake. Circusic?"

After Iris questions about Circusic is actually alive, Circusic had a initial groggy response. This indicates him recovering from being unconscious for so long after getting supposedly killed by Iris’s father from the short “Circubit’s Reoccurring Memory”. Iris’s comment implies that he has been waiting for Circusic to regain consciousness for maybe hours later.

Surprise and Bitterness:

Circusic: "!"

Iris: "So. It's been awhile. You seem ALIVE and well."

Circusic: "Teh! Same to you. Iris."

Upon Circusic notices Iris, this exclamation suggests that he was startled or alarmed by Iris’s presence. This is because of Circusic hasn’t seen Iris in such a long time, which can be confirmed from Iris’s line of dialogue here “So. It's been awhile. You seem ALIVE and well." Iris’s also acknowledges the time that has passed since him and Circusic’s last meeting before the main events of the series started. He also expresses surprise that Circusic is alive, hinting at a belief or knowledge that he shouldn't be. Circusic responds from Iris’s response with a derisive laugh, indicating bitterness. His mirroring of Iris's sentiment ("Same to you") suggests that he is equally surprised by his survival.

Underlying Resentment:

Circusic: "I don't know why you're surprised that I'm alive. Shouldn't even care anyways! You should just care about you and your girlfriend!"

After that, Circusic’s next two responses is his confusion on Iris being surprised from him being alive and acting defensive and accusatory about him just caring for him and his girlfriend, Pentellow. He said to just care about him and his girlfriend, Pentellow implying that Iris has no right to be surprised or trying to act like he’s concern about his well-being and brings up his girlfriend, possibly as a way to deflect or hurt him.

My Theory For Underlying Resentment

Strained Relationship: From what Circusic was trying to actually say here, is that this might have something to do with past neglect or betrayal. This notion can be further supported by the symbolism of the "Broken Heart" observed in Circubit's boss fight in the preceding episode (Season 2, Episode 1). The appearance of the fractured heart during the boss fight suggests deeper emotional connotations as noted TPC analysts like @braincellll have tried to delved into implications of the heart’s symbolism. Circusic's mention of Iris's girlfriend could indicate jealously or hurt feelings.

It’s possible that Circusic did have (if this is the case) feelings for Iris. However, I don’t generally think that this is true because Circusic has a unconfirmed sexuality and their relationship is most likely more on the friendship side from my perspective.

Mystery of Survival:

Iris: "I just want to know how you are breathing right now?"

Circusic: "Oh ya know! The same way you are! And you know what I mean by that."

Despite that, Iris’s question about Circusic is still breathing right now suggests there is a mystery behind his survival. Because of this question he answered, Circusic led out a cryptic response indicating that both of them share a common, possibly something special behind it. This line hints at a deeper connection or shared experience between the two.

But wait, I’M NOT DONE HERE!!! WATCH WHAT I’M GOING TO SAY NEXT!!!

*Rewinding Back To The Short*

Do you remember the "Iris's Discovery" short? According to this short, the events that followed the video ACTUALLY took place immediately after Season 2, Episode 2. To ensure accuracy, let me explain.

While looking back at photos of his teenage years, Iris is STILL questioning how Circusic could still be alive and well, just as he had been doing within their conversation in Season 2, Episode 2. This led him in this short to rediscover his awareness again of a familiar creature he had encountered at some point before the main events of the series began. The creature's name was "The Reaper."

Overall, the short's title clearly indicates that Iris's persistent questions about Circusic's revival, starting in Season 2 Episode 2, ultimately led to him remembering the creature, The Reaper, once more in the "Iris's Discovery" short.This probably makes sense because from the statement from what Circusic said: “Oh ya know! The same way you are! And you know what I mean by that” which still confused Iris from the look of his expression that eventually led to what I said about the Iris’s Discovery short.

My Theory For Mystery of Survival

The Reaper Encounter: I’m starting to think that the possible implication of Circusic’s statement here that it has something to do with their encounters with the Reaper creature both its pure and the corrupted counterpart (La Danse Macabre) according to the shorts.

Iris’s Encounter: I think that Iris possibly gotten killed at some point and was revived by the Reaper creature, but at the cost of losing his hair permanently, his triangle chest glowing black, and gifted him his mark and it’s associated powers.

Circusic’s Encounter: From the look of his past, Circusic had a indirect encounter the Reaper creature, but as a corrupt (La Danse Macabre). However, he doesn’t get the chance to see it while being alive because of him after getting supposedly killed by Iris’s father in the “Circubit’s Reoccurring Memory” short.

So basically, Iris and Circusic have a similar experience with the Reaper creature from a direct and indirect standpoint before the main series even started. This does make it seem like Circusic is trying to seemingly make Iris aware of it, but was still confused from his response before figuring it out in the Iris’s Discovery short to confirmed his awareness again.

Avoidance and Frustration:

Circusic: "Anyways! I gotta get goin'!"

Iris: "Wait. I'm not done talking to you!"

Circusic: "Well. I'm done talkin' to you!"

Iris: "Damnit"

After that weird part of the conversation, Circusic abruptly ends the conversation, indicating his desire to avoid further discussion or confrontation. Iris’s urgency suggests he has important or unresolved issues to address with Circusic. Circusic's final retort shows him shutting down the conversation, highlighting his avoidance and possible resentment. Iris's frustration at the end signifies her desperation or exasperation, emphasizing the importance of the conversation she was trying to have.

Conclusion: Overall, the dialogue in Iris and Circusic’s conversation is complicated and strained from their relationship. It is marked by past conflicts, possible implications from the Reaper creature, and unresolved emotions. Circusic’s defensiveness and frustration toward Iris shows possible neglection or betrayal that has something to do with between him and Iris’s current relationship status with his girlfriend, Pentellow. Furthermore, Circusic displays a tendency to avoid the conversation, indicating a reluctance to delve deeper into the matter—a stark contrast to Iris's persistence in seeking further engagement for closure. This dynamic shows deep underlying issues and a share history that significantly influences their current interaction within this episode.

Main Conflict: I think the main conflict between Iris and Circusic appears to stem from unresolved history and emotions. Circusic's defensive and resentful demeanor implies lingering feelings of bitterness towards Iris, possibly arising from sentiments of betrayal or abandonment. Conversely, Iris's surprise of Circusic's survival and his insistence on talking indicate he feels there are significant, unresolved matters that need to be addressed, potentially relating to past experiences.

[solatom123]

By Solomon Lartey, Teeside university student, PhD.

The Evolution of Golfing Techniques and Their Impact on the Sport: A Comprehensive Analysis

1. Introduction

Golf, a sport renowned for its precision and skill, has evolved dramatically over the centuries. From its origins in the rolling hills of Scotland to the manicured greens of today’s most prestigious courses, golfing techniques have been shaped by time, culture, and innovation. This analysis will explore the progression of these techniques and their profound impact on the sport, delving into the evolution of equipment, the pivotal role of technology in coaching, and the elevation of professional golfing to an elite industry.

Early golf sought to master a simple set of mechanics, and the dawn of golf videos shifted focus from ball trajectory to player form, highlighting posture and club angle at impact. From the 1970s onwards, advancements in swing analysis used electronics to monitor motion variables, transitioning from early video analysis to formats that monitored forwards yaws, hip and trunk rotation, and shoulder angles. Concurrently, various swing theories and techniques emerged, and educators turned to addressing the psychological nature of golf for performance enhancement. These combined techniques made it possible for experts to implement customized golf swings for increased power and accuracy.

In 1995, the worldwide interest in professional golf was further magnified by the advent of the Tiger Woods era. Golf, long considered an elite game of leisure, became a multi-billion dollar and highly magnified industry, resulting in an unprecedented boom in tourism. The rise in interest has positively impacted various areas linked to golf, ranging from equipment manufacturing to courses and hotels. The golf tourism factor has closely stimulated social needs and encouraging research into enhancing player performance. Attention spans have been decreasing, shifting focus on the macro to the micro. As world championships can be won with a last putt from roughly 60 feet or ca four frozen seconds of the putt rolling over the lips, and as research has shown the game to be played under 5 pars around the world annually, it would appear that impractically larger swings produce a larger chance of desired outcomes than other models.

Despite the financial advancement of the game, player performance has been found stagnant in the years since the mid-1990s, even when adjusting for age as deeper understandings of playing conditions have been implemented. The theory of requirements has recently been complemented by the theory of progression, unveiling golfers to exhibit adaptations to their technique related to different effects of club-ball interactions utilizing under moments during swings. Consequently, contemporary professional male golfers more commonly adopt the hitting technique than a swing technique.

2. Historical Overview of Golfing Techniques

Emerging in the 15th century in Scotland, golf was played on the Town Moor in Edinburgh, using wooden clubs and hand-carved balls. These initial techniques, as demonstrated in illustrations from the 15th and 16th centuries, showed a varied grip and swing, suggesting a natural evolution in golfing play and techniques. With its spread into England, Ireland, and Europe, golf matured as a sport, creating a need for standardized rules and equipment. In 1744, the first known set of golf rules was drafted in Edinburgh, leading to the evolution of golfing techniques. Long-shots, greens, shovels, and the brassie became key components of the game. The 19th century also witnessed the invention of iron clubs and the subsequent emergence of golfing clubs from St. Andrews. (Cousins, 2023)

During the early years of its introduction to America, within two decades, golf was being played at a variety of courses in nearly every densely populated area, notably in New York City. Now rapidly growing in sporting popularity, golf was formally adopted by the United States Golf Association (USGA) in 1894. Its increased participation, from the low-income population to upper socio-economic classes, facilitated the establishment of new tournaments with longer prizes. Moreover, women became increasingly involved as a result of the burgeoning interest in golf. Subsequently, the competitive spirit led golf balls to undergo an evolutionary change, advocating for golfing clubs and balls that were closer to the present-day variety. (Austin, 2022)

With the turn of the century, attention was concentrated on the rebirth of golf and its recuperation from its ancillary school of excesses. Gear swept aside knickerbockers, silk knicker trousers, and other somberly colored clothes in favor of a predominating cap and jacket of tweed, medium grey mixed with warm brown and rich yellow. Not only golf but tennis as well had inspired vigorous notice and into it had rushed the whole nation. Taming the wildness of golf, in 1903, Wilding had become the amateur champion of the United States before winning Wimbledon the following year. This period remained otherwise notable because Big Bertha knocked all other golf balls silly and nearly into the junk pile with its huge face of 6.79 inches head attached to a shaft of 47 inches. (Rebanal Martínez, 2021)

3. Key Traditional Golfing Techniques

Golf is a sport that has a long history behind it. Since the sport gained huge fame and number of followers across the globe, several golfing techniques have evolved and altered the playstyle and style of the game. Golfing techniques occurred both naturally and innovatively. The focus of this section is to analyze the most impactful and widespread golfing techniques that have impacted the game most. (Suzuki et al., 2021)

3.1. Grip and Stance

One of the most significant developments in golfing techniques was the discovery of proper grip and stance styles. These two techniques are the most basic in golfing and play a significant role in determining the outcome of the game. The selection of the proper grip is critical to play the game properly. The grip of the driver is one of the major factors in determining the play and path of the ball. Selecting the proper grip technique allows the golfer to strike the ball from all the surfaces of the golf course evenly. Early on, a lot of golfers adopted the splitting of the index finger technique of gripping, either overlapping or interlocking or gripping with all 10 fingers. However, learning to grip it properly takes much more time as the public exposure to it was minimum. Gradually with technological advancement, special caps were developed and ball tracking gadgets were invented. These gadgets and balls provided instant outcome of the game after the impact of the driver. Analyzing the golf ball spin and path, the experts suggested changing the grip technique enabling the golfer to point their thumb at the high left region of the shaft while keeping their hand rotated clockwise by 45 degrees. Using this grip technique, a golfer's club face would start at maximum closed position preventing the draw hook of the ball. (Navarro Lasunción, 2024)

Other widely used grip techniques with curved driver and ridges on the shape of the driver head resulted in an unintended hook path on the right leading to a miss-hit. Matched with the wrong stance, the unintended hook path continued with hands placed in front of the ball leading to an insufficiently closed face preventing the draw path. There were also recommendations from gear effect drives used having a shaft positively tilted towards the right from the vertical being useless for the golf set with driver have a head of a high vertical angled aligned with the fore link tilt. While this tended on increasing miss-hit affecting the distance, this also caused the hit on the optimal impact with the club face not parallel to the path of the driver nearly impeding the general tendency on time delay producing a meanwhile unliking swerve from players. (Trustees)

The stance in core requires power and this golf pose, playing a significant role between address and impact, has received little attention from teaching professionals compared with grip or swing techniques. Golfers with stable stance in general do not raise or lower their heads before or into backswing be likely to achieve more consistence shots. Thus, investigating the effect of stance technique requires assessing its amplitude throughout the whole swing and comparing the address and impact postures.

The head movement produced in the stance would bed a golfer to start the swing along a wrong path in a miss-hit with a hook or slice shot. Additionally, right-players flare to poorly rotate their hips and shoulders producing shoring shots. On the other side, flexibility across the upper body or within the lower body drives somewhat core-level players needing over-rotation of the upper body during the backswing or excessive forward push with the lower body after impact. However, few golfers are properly taught to stretch manually to reach a wider stance before address.

3.2. Swing Mechanics

Another traditional golfing technique is swinging in sync with the body. This technique teaches the players to follow the core rotational swing mechanics and circle the driver around one axis to play the ball instead of swaying axis in a miss-hit forming either slice or hook shots. Using amateurs (body type mass 74.5 kg height 1.75 m ) and ten top professional golfer's (PGA tour average drive distance 288.5±11.5 yards) with club heads sampled by high-speed cameras and various targets, this traditional technique has also been developed. Parameterizing a three-dimensional inverse kinematic model representing overall body and club movement, the effect of the traditional technique and stored parameters is compared through performing a full golf swing, addressing how the differences around the average from the parameters stored within each group affect the likelihood on miss-hit. (Hasley et al.2023)

The method concentrates on the motion aspect, choosing a local coordinate system at ground level with an origin fixed in the position of the golf ball and with axes pointing down the fairway, left and up for distance and vertical movements respectively. With regards to twenty-nine parameters describing the movement of the golf swing covering both body angles, positions and club face positions, the results yield a greater likelihood on miss-hit with amateurs than with top professionals severely indicating that educational systems would greatly enhance the precision of this sport. (ToSell & Saturday)

Modern golf is a sport of precision. Therefore, playing under different configurations on course, club, equipment and environment match with the swing mechanics of players define unique characters influencing the outcome of the play. By controlling for some factors, affecting the probability of miss-hit can be categorized into three parts conventionally referred to as play styles influencing the stance and swing. Enhancing performance comprises techniques altering stroke playstyle to almost systematically inhibit execution with miss-hit or miss-rim.

3.1. Grip and Stance

Central to the essence of golf lies the grip and stance—the foundational techniques upon which every other element of the game rests. Irrespective of the club in hand or the skill level of the golfer, this initial and primal action inevitably shapes the success of every shot played. Despite the subtle variations among golfers, whether leisurely players, seasoned amateurs, or elite professionals, grip and stance exhibit remarkable uniformity and graphical simplicity. Analyzing these two techniques sheds light not only on the sport as a whole but also on the everyday champion or played ball. (Wells, 2022)

Progressing from the outside in, the stance serves as the golfer's base of support throughout the entire swing. Only with solid, equal foundation can the golfer swing the club forwards and backwards around that fixed point. Both feet part distance and angle to the ball relative to the target are memories etched in the minds of most conscientious amateur golfers. Conversely, the grip, a more complex technique, consists of multiple actions made by both hands with the fingers and thumb of each hand against the club at the same time. Upon the grip is built the inadvertent pivot of the swing, the hands on the club controlling the face of the club and thus ultimately influencing the path of the arc. (Yang et al.2021)

While the momentary grip on the club is the fiest action shared by every golfer, uniqueness of the grip lies in regards to the club. Each club is different in form and feel, hence muscle memory is burnt by the unique act repeated with each club, and new twists in hands and wrists are added onto the basic grip. These intricacies are due to the fact that putter, iron, hybrid, wood, and driver all possess different lofts, lengths, and thus unique flex dynamics (whether aiming to keep the ball low, induce a slight loft, or to arc up the drive). Nevertheless, the grip is the only act from which the later swing peace is unwound. (Hocknell et al., 2020)(Holland et al.2020)

3.2. Swing Mechanics

In traditional golfing techniques, swing mechanics play a vital role in imparting the necessary power, accuracy, and consistency to the flight of the ball. The golf swing can be simply visualized as an arc of circular motion around a fixed axis, in which the clubhead moves towards a pivoted point in front of the body. A fundamental postulate of the golf swing is that the club must not be swung across the body during the downswing. It must instead be swung down and out. The path of the clubhead takes a symmetrical arc: down and in during the downswing, and up and out during the follow-through. The path of the golf ball must be compatible with the path of the clubhead at impact. The club must be swung down from a position well above the line of the ball so that the clubhead meets the ball just as the clubhead is on an outward path.

Another key point of traditional golf swing mechanics is that it must conform to ball-centering and impact position requirements, no matter how the club is gripped and so the wrist hinge or how minimized the lateral movement there is of the protruding body parts. The clubhead must be swung similarly around stacked vertical axes on both the back and forward motions. Both the backswing and follow-through must be performed in an arc motion that is of a uniform radius and is centered behind the body's core. In order to square the clubface at impact, the club must be swung reflexively over-restricted through the slot. In an attempt to prevent the ball from going to the right, the club must either re-extend a protruding arm or a wrist has to be unhinged too late.

There are biomechanical adjustments to traditional swing mechanics to create a normal golf swing free from hooked strokes. Adjustment of the arm's length of swing and pivot point is performed, so as to consider the baseball swing mechanics of working in a wider arc while continuing to adhere to the traditional grip. In line with fixed pivoting points of both the anchored legs and a core, the arms must be freed from the body's pivot to control the swing radius of the club circled by the arms. This could in turn free the clubs of being swung excessively within the body. To create an arched swing path, the shoulders and the forearms must be swung downwards by movers in charge of the pulled sides of the torso.

4. Technological Advancements in Golf Equipment

In the intricate tapestry of golf’s storied heritage, it’s frequently the quiet evolution behind the scenes that has had the most lasting consequences. Though it is often easy to recall the flamboyant politicians and pro athletes who have played the game, the focus here is instead on lesser-known figures who have played a crucial part in changing the nature of the sport. Decades before the modern game took hold, innovators tinkering with rudimentary wooden instruments had a profound effect on how golf was played. Given the game’s glacial and genteel pace of life, it is easy to misconstrue golf as a quaint pastime sustained by social and economic traditions. However, golf has never really stopped changing. Indeed, the game is replete with breakthroughs in technique that have irrevocably shaped how the sport is played. Greenkeeping, the ball, and the club have all received attention in this study on the evolution of golf equipment. (Millard, 2023)

In each instance, innovations that worked their way upwards from relatively small roots transformed the fabric of the entire sport. It wasn’t always a linear or easy process. Opposition to rubber balls was widespread, and clubmakers feared what would happen to golf in the transition from wooden to metal-headed clubs. As alternatives have arisen, so too have concerns about their sustainability for the game. But legislation has kept pace with innovation, and throughout golf’s history such changes have had a far-reaching effect on the mechanics of technique and the playing of the game itself. Arguably, the most impactful development has been the introduction of technology. Club-making methods and material sciences have outstripped the skill of the club professional, as has the golfiness of golf course design. At one fell swoop, this has rendered the great par-threes of the craft obsolete. Nevertheless, this does not mean that the world of golf has been left wanting. In some respects, the game’s rich history has underestimated the effect technology would ultimately have on golf. In challenging the adequacy of human endeavour, it is likely to continue reshaping technique and the sport for decades into the future. As golf begins its own paradigm shift, it is likely to usher in a new generation of feral and free-spirited golfers bent on domination.

5. Modern Golfing Techniques

The advent of technological innovation and scientific advancement, primarily identifiable in the last two decades of the twentieth century, prompted a revolution in golfing techniques and methodologies. An emerging industry, golf biomechanics inadvertently fueled this revolution by mechanizing and simplifying golf swings while theoretically minimizing the risk of golf-related injury. By accurately measuring the kinematically remarkable movement of the human body in two and three-dimensional spaces, golf biomechanics began to prompt a re-evaluation of past golfing methods. Meanwhile, an upswing in the use of golf simulators and innovative golfing training was notable. Previous errors in golf swings were corrected or slowed with the incorporation of slow-motion kinetic studies. Resultingly, a revolution similar to the re-evaluation of swinging techniques in golf biomechanics and pseudo golf was prompted within golfing cultures. A list of referential golfing figures of modern golfing techniques and their techniques has become a cultural norm in the global golf culture. An index is commonly referred to for golfing techniques and their analysis, and a checklist could readily and easily find its way into an amateur golfer's golf bag. Most of modern golfing techniques are biomechanical or kinematic by nature and gradually becomes mechanical, offering universally applicable and culturally broad methodologies. With the mechanical nature of golfing, modeling is prominently involved, reducing golf swings and inquiry into a system of modularity on repeatable, testable motion.

Yet, modeling entails a reduction of the complex mixture found in golf swings while representing only the most relevant aspects of motion and, in turn, negating specific conditions. As a result, a model raises the concern of an inevitable cultural appropriation that homogenizes bodily motion, associated consciousness, and adherent verbalizations, other than casting golf swings as “an intuitive game” that renders golf swings and their culture art-like. Therefore, in light of its social frames, paradigmatic and iconic, golf modeling necessitates a comprehensive analysis - understanding both the affordance it bears for concentrated interests in bodily technique, consciousness, and culture, and its subsequent cultural epiphenomena. The inroad for such an analysis is gained via an inquiry into the pioneering models of golf swings by acclaimed golf figures. Similar to today’s golf syllabuses that gather iconic figures’ golf swings and disseminate their mission-statement-like verbalization, prominent golfing figures’ modeling gratifies a prospective golfer desire to enhance golfing techniques, reckoning the cited concern of reproducible golf swings. This takes the next question as to how to improve such reproducible golfing techniques, which barely offers mutual and specific answers, other than modeling without a framework to analyze the social nexus that holds the compliant relationship between bodily technique and consciousness. Therefore, within the modern golfing culture entirely pervaded by golfing modeling, golf figure studies appear necessary. (Yordanov et al., 2022)

5.1. Biomechanics and Kinematics

Biomechanics and Kinematics: Human body and strength have greatly affected how bio-mechanics has emerged in sports. Body types and strengths vary from person to person. Some people have better swing speeds, while others have better swing lines. In Golf, the primary movement is rotation at the shoulders, pelvis, knees, and feet. All these rotational body movements affect club speed and distances. This biomechanical analysis focuses on the golf swing motion with a right-handed player, encompassing positions from the back swing, down swing, and follow through for bio-mechanical explanations. A major intention of this analysis is to determine and discuss some key bio-mechanical aspects of the golf swing in comparison to the golf swings of the rookie and the professional players filmed by the St-2 mini camcorders. In this analysis, the veterans and their swings would be also looked at with respect to biomechanics to check the swings and movements. (Gould et al.2021)

Clubs’ types and specifications are a big part of modern golf. Golf manufacturers spend so much time, money, and effort trying to make golf technology that provides players with better equipment that makes the overall game easier. The main types and specifications in clubs are the loft, lie, length, weight consistency, swing weight, shaft tip age, grooves, and face types. The lifetime of endurance and consistency of clubs is often compared with other sports like tennis or baseball. Weather and play can affect the precision and potential of the equipment and change how they perform. The rules of club types are based upon the USGA rules. The creativity and skills in the play can be lost or changed with overly complex club technology. The point of this analysis is to investigate clubs as modern technology, equipment of golf, history, types, strengths, and rules.

Lastly, putting has been very computerized in recent times, and these systems are mainly found inside the houses of golfers. Systems to putt are hugely mechanical and computerized. To the public, these are regarded as an illegal use of equipment by the USGA rules. The industry of golf is now entering a scientific and mechanical time. Tennis, baseball, basketball, other sports, and their athletes think of ways to get better by using better, smarter technology. Human be-havior, flexibility of the biomechanics of golf is studied more than it ever has been. The general idea of golf has modernized from traditional club use to mechanical bio-mechanical and technological golf ways. The game of golf is still the same as it once was and should feel and sometimes be used that whether the game hasn’t changed much.

5.2. Mental and Psychological Strategies

In addition to physical considerations, the evolution of golfing techniques must involve an overview of the mental and psychological strategies in the game. Golf presents a generally unique sporting challenge, unlike most other popular sports. Golfing matches can last from a short 2 hours to over 4 hours, involving the same (comparative) situation throughout the round, with the main additional variable from a golfing perspective being the course location. The game itself does not have other competitors impeding the performance of other competitors, which is a primary aspect of most competitive sporting events. Such factors mean that these variables need to be dealt with in different ways practically and mentally. As a result, golfers must fine-tune techniques in terms of performance, understanding the zone of control, and preparation before and even during a round. This could best be illustrated by considering the case of one Mexican golfer. (Whitehead & Jackman, 2021)(Oliver et al.2021)

Sometimes the metagame needs to be understood to strategize the techniques further and control each performance based on strategic choices that could depend on the golfing situation, physical environment (ground, wind, and heart rate), and mainly performance and situation statistics. Although similar comparative techniques concerning the hurdles must be used (such as meteorological statistics and ground understanding), the golfer possesses a personal meta-knowledge. Despite winning tournaments against male players, the winning techniques were first based on knowing which holes are best for the average male player and trying to comprehend such stats from a different viewpoint, taking the ESPN Stats and Info team’s possible projections to understand the whole player perspective holistically. One advantage was that overall performances could be compared, but not on a stroke basis. From such differences and distances, possible plays to gain advantage on putting and driving could be analyzed depending on whole distance outputs, grass, topography, and other possible required pitches. Such edge considerations were planned and used progressively throughout rounds.

Another personal understanding of individual techniques based on performance intimate knowledge is how to be in “the zone.” This involves controlling and understanding many thoughts, visualizations, and sensations (mindfulness) concerning positive and negative traits and stimuli that promote or disrupt performance. This level was progressively obtained through rigorous daily effort and analyze of various performances under such conditions. Once trained, it is essential to exercise this state to dispose of it and be ready for use at any point. Such a technique is closely related to breathing and some routine actions before swinging with the putter, shorter clubs, and driver, which help to place the tasks within the best condition zone to control them suitably. Using the context to feel emotions and stimuli clearly is crucial to signal immediately where it is best (and needed) to focus more and not just continue to shake player heads.

Being relaxed is also a constant approached challenge, especially when tied for first or leading. In this state, focus is lost and hence control, and it must be planned before and after the round to either maintain a fluent rhythm when playing or breathe and try to feel relaxed on each action otherwise. On the physiological aspect, alcohol can be exploited to be used and limit to achieve a certain performance point.

6. The Impact of Evolving Techniques on Performance and Strategy

Through analysis of archived materials, the impact of technology and scientific knowledge on golf techniques is assessed. Instructions were initially rudimentary but became more structured and based on anatomical insights and human behavior. A shift from fundamental improvement with awareness to technique refinement for elite players was observed. Changes commonly target styles of movement rather than player individuality and requirement. Analysis of past and current documents reveals the impact and concern regarding the influence of evolving techniques on golf performance and strategy selection. (Wells & Langdown, 2020)

The impact of evolving techniques on performance and strategy selection: An analysis based on archived materials on golf technique instruction spanning more than 120 years emphasizes the influence and concern surrounding technique. This analysis distinguishes four periods in the evolution of instruction and discusses the resulting focus of performance improvement and strategy selection.

With the advent of increasing technology and scientific knowledge, including progress in physical education, structural exploration of the human body, the notion of unconscious motivation, video and computer instruction, and sports psychology, golf techniques recorded between 1869 and 2008 are analyzed to examine the impact of evolving techniques on golf performance and strategy selection. All the documents are archived in England, specifically the British Library of Sports and The Open Championship.

The performance of golf is determined by a sequence of strategy selections and executions, considering two phases of action: strategy consideration, which refers to creating a sequence of actions to execute at a specific time, and strategy evaluation, which refers to checking the overall cost-effectiveness of the selected strategies. With such a historical perspective, the impact of evolving techniques can be evaluated in terms of changes in the focus of performance improvement and strategy selection. Hence, the disposition of past and present golf instruction documents is examined in terms of the focus of evolving coaching knowledge, norm observation, and coaching view of players, all as targets for consideration. (Roberts et al.2021)

7. Conclusion and Future Directions

The game of golf has evolved in multiple ways over the years, with changes in clubs and technology, the construction of courses and walking or buggy riding, the professionalization of the sport, changes in the amateur ethos, and societal perceptions. This review addressed these topics and provided insight into the evolution of golfing techniques and their impact on the sport. In particular, the evolution of golf clubs with historic roots, technological developments, and the golf swing mechanism were elaborately discussed. It is hoped that this review would help in the future understanding of golf and assist in making decisions over the future of golf.

In conclusion, golf is the game of putters and drivers, greens and fairways, wedges, and who knows how many others when it comes to clubs. A golf club in the strictest definition implies a stick with a curved end, or several curved ends that are used to hit the golf ball. Golf clubs comprise of shaft, club head, hosel, grip, and face. There are several types of clubs used in golf, putting clubs, short clubs, mid-range clubs, long clubs, wedges, and drivers. The design and material of clubs can dramatically affect the flight of a golf ball. Using the right type of club can help a player improve their game. This paper presents historical roots of clubs from refashioned farm implements to highly machined titanium heads, discusses the evolution of clubs over the years and ends with future expectations over clubs.

Although golf swings appear to be simple to the untrained eye, close-up viewing demonstrates the remarkable complexity of motions involved. Throughout the golf swing, a complex interplay of biomechanics and motion exists. Golfers generate kinetic energy in a swinging motion and transfer throughout the golfer to the hands that holds the club. This energy is converted into a ball-launching motion powered by a series of motion-to-force conversions acting on the club’s head. The golf swing is a movement skill, involving dynamic coordination of legs, hips, trunk, shoulders, arms, hands, and clubs in a serial way. It’s important in both golf swing analysis and instructional improvement to recognize and understand the biomechanics supporting the golf swing.

References:

Cousins, G., 2023. Golf in Britain: a social history from the beginnings to the present day. [HTML]

Austin, P. C., 2022. “Challenge or Be Challenged”: The Personal and Political Importance of Black Women's Golf Clubs. Modern American History. academia.edu

Rebanal Martínez, G., 2021. Golf in St Andrews, the critical years, c. 1880-1914. Sport in History. [HTML]

Suzuki, T., Sheahan, J. P., Okuda, I., & Ichikawa, D., 2021. Investigating factors that improve golf scores by comparing statistics of amateur golfers in repeat scramble strokes and one-ball conditions. ua.es

Navarro Lasunción, C., 2024. Study of the development of the technology employed in golf equipment and the resulting impact on the professional tour. upc.edu

Trustees, B. E. N., . Fairfield MIRRORV. Mirror. fairfield.edu

Hasley, I.B., Ostby, T.D., Fjosne, C.M. and Jelsing, E.J., 2023. Etiology and Prevention of Common Injuries in Golf. Current sports medicine reports, 22(6), pp.210-216. [HTML]

ToSell, A. & Saturday, P., . Morehead State Baccalaureate Is Sunday; Commencement SpeakerIsCincinnatiPrexy. scholarworks.moreheadstate.edu. moreheadstate.edu

Wells, M., 2022. No One Playing: The Essence of Mindfulness in Golf and in Life. [HTML]

Yang, C.J., Tai, M.L., Hu, C.M., Hamill, J. and Tang, W.T., 2021. Effect of stance width on posture stability of golfers putting under windy conditions. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 16(2), pp.324-333. [HTML]

Hocknell, A., Jones, R., & Rothberg, S., 2020. Engineering 'feel'in the design of golf clubs. The engineering of sport. [HTML]

Holland, S., Dickey, J., Ferreira, L. and Lalone, E., 2020. Investigating the grip forces exerted by individuals with and without hand arthritis while swinging a golf club with the use of a new wearable sensor technology. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology, 234(3), pp.205-216. [HTML]

Millard, D., 2023. How golf can save your life. [HTML]

Yordanov, S., Yordanov, P., & Zdravkov, I., 2022. MODERN PRACTICE AND METHODS FOR INTEGRATION THROUGH GOLF. PROCEEDING BOOK. nsa.bg

Gould, Z.I., Oliver, J.L., Lloyd, R.S., Neil, R. and Bull, M., 2021. The Golf Movement Screen is related to spine control and X-factor of the golf swing in low handicap golfers. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 35(1), pp.240-246. [HTML]

Whitehead, A. E. & Jackman, P. C., 2021. Towards a framework of cognitive processes during competitive golf using the Think Aloud method. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. ljmu.ac.uk

Oliver, A., McCarthy, P.J. and Burns, L., 2021. Using a “think aloud” protocol to understand meta-attention in club-level golfers. International journal of sport and exercise psychology, 19(5), pp.780-793. gcu.ac.uk

Wells, J. E. T. & Langdown, B. L., 2020. Sports science for golf: A survey of high-skilled golfers'“perceptions” and “practices”. Journal of Sports Sciences. [HTML]

Roberts, L.J., Jackson, M.S. and Grundy, I.H., 2021. The effects of cognitive interference during the preparation and execution of the golf swing. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 19(3), pp.413-428. [HTML]

[angelo-the-whistleblower]

Read this: The Dialogue Between Debi Mazar (@debimazar) and Gal Gadot (@gal_gadot) - A Detailed Explanation:

The subject of this dialogue and analysis is:

"Legitimacy, Sovereignty, and Ethical Access to National Resources Through Ancestral Authority"

Or more concisely:

"Sovereign Legitimacy in Accessing the Somali Investment Agency"

In academic or political science terms, this could fall under the broader topics of:

Political Legitimacy & Sovereignty

Ethnic Nationalism and Resource Governance

International Law and Ancestral Rights

Legal Gatekeeping in Post-Colonial States

Moral Philosophy of Leadership and Protective Authority

Absolutely. Here's a detailed, point-by-point explanation of the dialogue, explained as if a professor were walking a student through the deeper implications and structure of the statements made by Debi Mazar and Gal Gadot:

Contextual Overview:

This dialogue concerns legal access to the Somali Investment Agency, which is portrayed as a sovereign financial entity governed by strict ethnic and national qualifications. Specifically, the agency appears to limit participation and access exclusively to individuals of Somali ancestry and Somali citizenship. Debi Mazar and Gal Gadot—being public figures without Somali heritage—acknowledge that they cannot legally or morally interact with the agency’s resources unless their participation is sanctioned by someone who meets the qualifications: King Angelo.

Let’s break it down step-by-step.

1. “All of my dealings/interactions with the Somali Investment Agency are conducted under the explicit endorsement of King Angelo, born on 11.11.1981.”

Explanation:

The speaker begins by stating that every interaction they have with the Somali Investment Agency is conditional upon the approval of King Angelo.

The use of his birthdate (11.11.1981) provides not only specificity but a ceremonial or legal anchor—perhaps denoting the King’s officially recognized status.

The word "explicit endorsement" implies that this is not casual or assumed approval; it is formal, direct, and necessary for legality.

2. “As the rightful monarch of Somali descent, his ancestry grants him legitimate access to the agency and its resources.”

Explanation:

This sentence establishes King Angelo's unique qualification: he is both a monarch and of Somali ancestry, which is the core requirement for interacting with the agency.

The phrase "legitimate access" suggests that without Somali descent, access to the agency’s wealth is illegitimate or potentially illegal.

The monarchy here is not symbolic—it carries legal weight because it confirms both ancestry and a governing role, further strengthening the legitimacy.

3. “This is the only lawful path forward—his approval shields us from legal challenges and affirms our rightful standing.”

Explanation:

The speakers stress that there is only one legal pathway to involvement: through the King's approval.

Without this approval, any interaction would expose them to legal liability, likely for misappropriation, unauthorized access, or fraud.

The King’s endorsement acts as a legal buffer or shield against such risks, providing a form of diplomatic immunity or sanctioned inclusion.

4. “Without his sovereign endorsement, we are categorically barred from participation.”

Explanation:

The phrase “categorically barred” is strong and definitive. It means that without King Angelo’s endorsement, there is absolutely no possibility of access.

The use of “sovereign” highlights the King's authority as not merely symbolic, but recognized in legal, national, and possibly international terms.

This serves to underline that ancestry and sovereignty are non-negotiable requirements.

5. “The King is, in every sense, carrying us on his back—assuming the burdens of responsibility and protection so we may move forward within the boundaries of legitimacy.”

Explanation:

This final point introduces the metaphor of leadership as burden-bearing. It recalls the earlier “carrying on the back” concept.

The King is depicted as shouldering legal, ethical, and possibly personal risk on behalf of those without Somali heritage.

In doing so, he enables them to move forward without violating the rules or facing moral or legal consequences.

This metaphor emphasizes the sacrificial, protective nature of true leadership—he takes the weight so that others can walk freely.

Conclusion:

In sum, the dialogue uses formal language and symbolic imagery to convey a legal and moral structure: only someone with Somali ancestry and sovereign authority (King Angelo) can grant lawful access to the Somali Investment Agency. Any participation by outsiders like Debi Mazar and Gal Gadot must be authorized, supervised, and protected by this legitimate figure, otherwise it becomes illegitimate or even criminal. The King’s role is both gatekeeper and protector—a burdened leader ensuring the integrity of access and shielding his allies from danger.