Tumgik
#richard earl
jtownraindancer · 5 months
Text
remember when i said most of this nonsense started because i liked burn's voice? ...yeh.
13 notes · View notes
popping-your-culture · 11 months
Text
Tumblr media
471 notes · View notes
blueberry-bubbles130 · 2 months
Text
We are back for another historical hypothetical folks!
And this time it is:
Think of it as a Midsomer Murders/Clue style thing.
I don’t have an answer for who the victim is. You can choose anyone you want, for the victim.
109 notes · View notes
random-brushstrokes · 10 months
Text
Tumblr media
Richard Earl Thompson (American, 1914- 1991) - The Stroll
250 notes · View notes
une-sanz-pluis · 7 months
Text
Thinking about Henry V attending his first parliament as Prince of Wales at 13 years old and being bored out of his skull and imagining how much worse it would've been for Richard II, who attended his first parliament as Prince of Wales at 9 years old.
Thinking about Henry VI attending parliament as a literal infant too.
132 notes · View notes
youronebraincell · 3 days
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
THE FREAKIN THIGH HOLSTER?!?
Tumblr media Tumblr media
BARK BARK BARK
28 notes · View notes
laracroftdaily · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Tomb Raider: The Legend of Lara Croft showrunner Tasha Huo reveals how the Netflix original series bridges the gap between eras of the classic games.
Tasha Huo interview for Den of Geek, July 2024
Tumblr media
34 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
THE WHITE QUEEN 10-YEAR ANNIVERSARY WEEK
Day Two - Favourite Villain: Richard Neville, 16th Earl of Warwick
138 notes · View notes
lulu2992 · 2 months
Text
A data miner known as Galaxy (@___Gal4xy___) on X (Twitter) posted pictures, I suppose from the deleted in-game encyclopedia, of a few Far Cry 5 characters that used to look... different.
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
The first one seems to be the man we now know as Cameron Burke, but if it weren’t for his vest, I honestly wouldn’t have guessed who he was. The Marshal looked pretty much like this in other promotional pictures, though:
Tumblr media
The second is Earl Whitehorse, but again, I’m not sure I would have recognized the Sheriff without his uniform. I can’t tell if he has the same face model but I think he looks a bit like Guy Marvel here.
Then, we have Dutch, who seems to have the same face... but clearly a lot more hair (and no tattoos)!
Finally, there is Kim, and the two main differences between this early version and her in-game self are her hairstyle and the tattoo on her left arm.
Also, did you know Pratt used to look like this? And that they then temporarily gave him a mustache?
33 notes · View notes
paulic · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Paul & rapper Earl Sweatshirt (+NPR interview that happened right after)
35 notes · View notes
eve-to-adam · 11 months
Text
Tumblr media
Cecily Neville and her father, Ralph.
That's it. That's all the description I can do before I pass out.
76 notes · View notes
nwonitro · 1 month
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Sad news, RIP Francoise Hardy (80), Dr Ruth Westheimer (96), Richard Simmons (76), Shannen Doherty (53), Shelley Duvall (75), Bob Newhart (94), Greg Kihn (75), Alain Delon (88), Phil Donahue (88), James Earl Jones (93), James B. Sikking (90), Gena Rowlands (94).
16 notes · View notes
100gayicons · 26 days
Text
Tumblr media
Barbara Jordan was a civil rights leader and progressive politician from Texas. She was first African-American woman from the south elected to the United States House of Representatives.
Jordan achieved notoriety for delivering a powerful opening statement at the House Judiciary Committee hearings during the impeachment process against Richard Nixon. In 1976, she became the first African-American, and the first woman, to deliver a keynote address at a Democratic National Convention.
Tumblr media
Jordan is also known for her work as chair of the U.S. Commission on Immigration Reform.
In her 1979 autobiography Jordan recalled "having a swell time" meeting Nancy Earl for the first time in the late 1960s.
"I had had a great time and enjoyed myself very much. I remember I thought: This is something I would like to repeat… Nancy Earl is a fun person to be with … I could relax and enjoy myself … I had discovered I could relax at parties like that where I was safe."
Jordan and Earl were together for nearly 30 years. They bought land in Texas together and built a home in 1976. Earl, an educational psychologist, occasionally helped with speechwriting.
Jordan never publicly identifying as lesbian or queer. She was open about her relationship with Earl in private. But because she was the subject of homophobic attacks, and her advisors cautioning her against revealing the extend of her relationship with Earl in public.
Jordan retired in 1979 after three terms in Congress due to health challenges from multiple sclerosis. Nancy Earl became her caretaker as her health declined.
After leaving office, Jordan received the Nelson Mandela Award for Health and Human Rights in 1993, and a Presidential Medal of Freedom, presented by President Bill Clinton in 1994.
An obituary in The Houston Chronicle described Earl as Jordan's "longtime companion" — the first public confirmation of their relationship.
Tumblr media
11 notes · View notes
Text
Here’s a more grounded historical hypothetical before we get into the truly ridiculous ones:
As always there will be rounds to this poll so I will try to cover more historical figures from around this era. I just tend to start around the War of the Roses/The Tudors because they’re my favourite time periods.
33 notes · View notes
random-brushstrokes · 10 months
Text
Tumblr media
Richard Earl Thompson - Paris Flower Market (1977)
100 notes · View notes
wonder-worker · 1 month
Text
The division between the two families [the Woodvilles and the Nevilles] and their allies can be seen in the royal charters that they witnessed. Warwick, Rivers and Archbishop Neville of York, while serving as chancellor and afterwards, were fairly constant witnesses to royal charters and consequently often appeared together. This was not, however, the case for other family members and friends. From 1466 to 1469, if Scales or Woodville associates like Sir John Fogge, John Lord Audley or Humphrey Lord Stafford of Southwick witnessed royal charters, then members of the Neville group, such as John Neville, earl of Northumberland, or John Lord Wenlock would not, and vice versa. Discounting the ubiquitous Warwick, Rivers and Archbishop Neville, of the twenty-four charters issued between February 1466 and June 1469, twelve were witnessed by men associated with the Woodvilles, eight by men associated with the Nevilles and two were witnessed by no member of either group beyond the two earls at their heads and the archbishop; only two charters, both from 1466, featured associates of both families.
Such striking segregation of witnesses suggests that something more than simple convenience or availability was at play. [...] The evidence of these witness lists does show the extent of the split between the two groups from early in Edward's [first] reign and of the need for political society to work with that cleavage in the heart of the Yorkist regime."
-Theron Westervelt, "Royal charter witness lists and the politics of the reign of Edward IV"
*This is specifically applicable for Edward IV's first reign; in contrast, the charters in his second reign displayed a great deal of aristocratic and domestic unity and cohesion.
#the woodvilles#edward iv#wars of the roses#richard neville 16th earl of warwick#my post#elizabeth woodville#Obviously I hate the idea of Elizabeth and her family being seen as a social-climbing invasive species who banished the old nobility and#drove Warwick/Richard into rebellion and dominated the government and controlled the king and were responsible for Everything Wrong Ever#but I also dislike the 'revisionist' idea that they were ACTUALLY just passive and powerless bystanders or pawns who kept to their#social “place” (whatever the fuck that means). Frankly speaking this is more of a diminishment than a realistic defense.#the 'Queen's kin' (as they were known at the time) were very visible at court and demonstrably influential and prominent in politics#and as this shows there DOES seem to have been a genuine division/conflict between them and the Nevilles during Edward's first reign#(which DID directly lead to the decline of Neville dominance in England though the maintained honored positions and influence of their own)#Especially since Edward's second reign was entirely void of any such divisions - instead the nobility were united and focused on the King#even Clarence and Gloucester's long and disruptive quarrel over the Warwick inheritance never visibly left its mark on charters#so the Woodville/Neville divide from the 1460s must have been very sharp and divisive indeed#And yes it's safe to say that Elizabeth Woodville was probably involved: whether in her own right or via support of her family - or both -#it's illogical to argue that she was uninvolved (even the supportive Croyland Chronicle writes that Edward was “too greatly influenced”#by her; she and her family worked together across the 1470s; she was the de-facto head in 1483; etc)#Enhanced by the fact that Elizabeth was the first Englishwoman to be crowned queen - meaning that the involvement of her#homeborn family marked the beginning of “a new and largely unprecedented factor in the English power structure” (Laynesmith)#This should be kept in mind when it comes to analyzing contemporary views of them and of Elizabeth's own anomalous position#HOWEVER understanding the complexity of the situation at hand doesn't mean accepting the traditionally vilified depiction of the Woodvilles#Warwick and the Nevilles remained empowered and (at least outwardly) respected by the regime#Whether he was driven by disagreements over foreign policy or jealousy or ambition - the decision to rebel was very much his own#Claiming that the Woodvilles were primarily responsible is ridiculous (and most of the nobility continued to support Edward regardless)#There's also the fact that Warwick took what was probably a basic factional divide and turned it into a misogynistic and classist narrative#of a transgressive “bad” woman who became queen through witchcraft and aggrandized a family of social-climbing “lessers” who replaced#the inherently more deserving old nobility and corrupted the realm - later revived and intensified by Richard III a decade later#ie: We can recognize their genuine division AND question the (false/unfair) problematic narrative around the Woodvilles. Nuance is the key.
10 notes · View notes