#visual display technology

[teknewsfeed]

Amazing 3D LED roof immersion!

[twich-of-tism]

Refreshable Braille Display

{1st source, 2nd source}

[limitype]

Download Here: https://www.behance.net/gallery/225354775/Universa-Futuristic-Font

Universa is a display font with a unique futuristic impression, offering a distinctive and eye-catching design. It is the perfect choice for projects that require a modern look, especially in fields such as technology, astronomy, automotive, and more. Its sleek, contemporary style ensures that it stands out in any design, providing a clean and cutting-edge appearance that aligns with the latest trends and innovations.

[vivencyglobal]

AV Solutions – Expert Audio-Visual Services by Vivency Technology LLC

Vivency Technology LLC specializes in cutting-edge IT audio-visual (AV) solutions, offering comprehensive services such as design, installation, integration, maintenance, and support. Our advanced AV systems cater to diverse industries, ensuring seamless communication and enhanced user experiences.

[beingjellybeans]

Elevate Your Streaming Game with the vivo Y100

In an era where streaming entertainment has become an integral part of daily life, finding the perfect device to enhance your viewing experience is paramount. Enter the vivo Y100, a smartphone designed to elevate your streaming game to new heights. With its stunning display, immersive audio, and ample storage options, the vivo Y100 promises to be your ultimate companion for all your…

[techdriveplay]

What We Know About the PS5 Pro

In the world of gaming, the anticipation for the next big leap in console technology continually builds. Among the forefront of these advancements is the rumored PS5 Pro, a potential successor to Sony’s highly acclaimed PlayStation 5. This enhanced version promises to push the boundaries of what gamers can expect in terms of performance, graphics, and overall gaming experience. As whispers of its…

[klara-usa]

Klara Projections

Klara Projections is your trusted partner in creating unforgettable home entertainment experiences through our premium home theater projection screens. As the industry leader in innovative projection solutions, we bring cutting-edge technology and uncompromising quality to every aspect of our product line.

Our extensive range of home theater screens is meticulously designed to cater to the diverse needs of modern households. From sleek fixed-frame screens that seamlessly blend into your living space to versatile motorized screens that offer flexibility in installation, we have the perfect solution for every home theater enthusiast.

Experience cinema-quality visuals in the comfort of your own home with our state-of-the-art screens, meticulously engineered to deliver unparalleled clarity, vibrant colors, and immersive contrast. Whether you're enjoying an action-packed blockbuster, delving into the world of gaming, or streaming your favorite content, Klara Projections ensures that every moment is brought to life with breathtaking realism.

With a focus on craftsmanship, performance, and customer satisfaction, Klara Projections is dedicated to exceeding your expectations and transforming your home into the ultimate entertainment destination. Choose Klara Projections for unparalleled quality, reliability, and innovation in home theater projection solutions.

Visit Our Website

[gitzette]

🌟 Big reveal for Apple enthusiasts! 🌟 The future of MacBook Pro with OLED display is here, promising stunning visuals and a game-changing user experience. Dive into our article to discover how the collaboration between Apple and Samsung Electronics is setting a new standard in laptop technology. Don't miss out on this exciting innovation! #MacBookProOLEDDisplay

[market-insider]

Optical Film Market's Influence on the Future of Display Systems

The global optical film market size is anticipated to reach USD 48.35 billion by 2030, according to a new report by Grand View Research, Inc., growing at a CAGR of 8.7% over the forecast period. Increasing demand for consumer electronics devices is expected to significantly drive the industry during the forecast period. Increasing demand for better visibility, optimum brightness, and lower power consumption for illuminating automotive instrument panels and displays is creating lucrative opportunities for optical film in automotive display applications. In addition, properties, such aslight control & enhancement, increased brightness, improved contrast, better sunlight durability, and others, are propelling the product demand in various applications.

Optical Film Market Report Highlights

In terms of revenue, the polarizing film segment accounted for the maximum share in 2021. The segment is expected to grow further at a steady CAGRover the forecast period

The smartphones application segment accounted for a significant revenue share in 2021 and will retain its industry position throughout the forecast period

The rising middle-class population, shifting spending priorities, and changing consumption patterns towards more discretionary spending are driving the segment growth

The Asia Pacific region led the global industry and accounted for the largest share of the overall revenue in 2021

Strong manufacturing bases of consumer electronics companies and the presence of several end-use industries in the region are anticipated to fuel the product demand over the forecast period

For More Details or Sample Copy please visit link @: Optical Film Market Report

These applications include automotive displays, televisions, desktops & laptops, smartphones, tablets, signage & advertising display boards. Moreover, the rising adoption of digital & advertising display boards in commercial verticals, increasing infrastructural development, especially in emerging countries, and technological advancement in display products are projected to create product demand in signage & advertising display boards. Asia Pacific is anticipated to progress at the fastest CAGR over the forecast period. China led the APAC regional market in 2021 owing to the rising demand for the product in applications including automotive display, televisions, desktops & laptops, smartphones, tablets, signage & advertising display boards.

In addition, a well-established manufacturing base for consumer electronics in Taiwan, China, and South Korea is anticipated to provide further impetus to the region’s growth. However, the recent outbreak of COVID-19 in countries, such as India, China, and Japan,is impacting the product demand in signage & advertising display boards, smartphones, and otherapplications.Declining demand from end-use consumers, nationwide or partial city lowdown, and a slowdown in manufacturing activities as a result of the pandemic further hampered the region’s growth in the short term.

OpticalFilm #DisplayTechnology #VisualInnovation #ScreenEnhancement #FilmicPrecision #DisplaySolutions #VisualExcellence #TechTrends #DisplayQuality #FilmTechnology #VisualCommunication #InnovationInDisplay #ScreenInnovation #DisplayTech #ClarityInVision #VisualPerformance #DisplayFilm #OpticalInnovation #FilmMarket #HighPerformanceDisplays

[teknewsfeed]

Holographic fan technology!

[vivencyglobal]

Comprehensive IT Audio Visual (AV) Solutions for Modern Businesses

Enhance your organization's communication, collaboration, and presentation capabilities with our cutting-edge IT Audio Visual (AV) solutions. We offer advanced AV system design, seamless integration, and reliable installation services tailored to meet the needs of businesses, educational institutions, and conference facilities. Our solutions include high-quality video conferencing systems, interactive displays, smart audio systems, and centralized AV control. Experience unparalleled audio clarity, crystal-clear visuals, and user-friendly interfaces that elevate your operational efficiency and engagement. Let us transform your workspace with the latest AV innovations.

[sirfrogsworth]

In this scene, they are in the middle of the woods under a canopy of trees. They show the sky and there is no moon.

The light has absolutely no motivation.

Motivated lighting is a philosophy where all of the light sources on screen have a logical source. The light from a smartphone on someone's face. A lamp next to the couch. Sterile overhead office lights.

Often filmmakers will still use their own custom light sources, but they will simulate these things to give the impression the light has motivation.

Compare this to when all they really had were bright spotlights and insensitive film. An indoor scene just couldn't have this warm and cozy feel. And the light was just blasted in from everywhere.

Black and white helped a lot. You could still get dramatic effect despite things needing to be overlit. Or you could play with contrast ratios and shadow.

All the stuff you need to see was very bright and exposed well onto film and all the stuff you didn't was very dark.

But there was no graduation in between. It was hard to be subtle.

And when television and movies went color, this black and white contrast advantage was lost.

You can see EVERYTHING. And look at those sharp shadows. Everyone is just being blasted in the face with lights.

This sitcom lighting persisted long past when it was necessary. It became part of the sitcom language.

I think M*A*S*H was one of the first shows to subvert the overlit sitcom aesthetic. They began to play with lighting that had more motivation.

But aesthetic standards are hard to kill. And despite the heavy influence of M*A*S*H, sitcoms persisted all the way into the Friends era.

Her lamp isn't even on. Everything is just lit by God.

I don't think you will see a living room or kitchen scene lit like this very much from here on out.

People are getting used to lighting making more logical sense.

With the advent of LED lighting that can be any size, shape, and brightness, as well as cameras that can interpret very dark images, modern shows can now use bright and dark as narrative tools.

I think Severance does this well, and still keeps everything properly motivated.

But this newfound flexibility has created new problems. If you can film dark things, how dark is too dark? And how do you make sure the audience can see all of the important visual information?

The two worst examples of unmotivated lighting are always space helmets and cars.

It's a conceit. You gotta see the faces so these things are usually forgiven.

But the biggest debate in the realm of unmotivated lighting is night scenes. People have lots of opinions on how best to use light in the dark.

This is because following a motivated lighting philosophy can be especially tricky. Particularly if your setting is a secluded area without any artificial light sources.

Many cinematographers will try to give some sense of moonlight. But moonlight is very hard to replicate, so the effect usually ends up looking pretty fake.

This scene during a blackout in Die Hard 4 looks like they took the brightest light they had, mounted it as high as possible and said, "Fuck it, that's moon-ish."

If the DP is hardcore into motivated lighting, they just make the screen really really dark, like the Long Night battle in Game of Thrones.

The really really dark option bugs a lot of people.

Froggie Tangent about Dark Scenes:

I originally thought people needed to adjust their display settings. But then I realized not everyone watches content in a darkened room like a vampire. But if you find a show or movie is too dark, turning off any room lights will help a lot. Watching it in HDR will also help. And watching it on an OLED will help even more.

Scenes this dark are mostly a fad. DPs are experimenting with the possibilities of new technology. But sometimes they forget not everyone has that technology yet. And they forget some people watch stuff on their phones in a room full of sunlight.

Eventually the fad will fade, we will all adopt better screens, and the darkness will land somehwere between "I can't see shit" and "it would never be that bright in real life."

[End of tangent]

In the olden days, since film wasn't sensitive enough to do scenes in the dark, almost everything needed to have unmotivated lighting just to make sure their film wasn't a grainy mess. And as a culture, we sort of got used to that style. They'd mess with the contrast ratios to give the feeling of night, but if you think about where the light is coming from too hard, it won't make any sense. They took a Broadway theater approach to lighting and so a lot of movies felt like they were on a soundstage.

The 1961 West Side Story is a good example.

They've got a spot light hitting them, but not the building behind them. I guess that could be an overhead street light. But street lights are meant to flood the area like an ever expanding donut of light. A spotlight is like a directly projected cone of light. It is perfectly pointed at the side of their face and not coming from above.

She has some magical purple light coming from... somewhere.

And then they are in an area under a bridge, far away from any lights, but they've got soft fill light with a bright rim coming from the right.

Speilberg's version has much more motivated light.

This one is a bit of a cheat, some very bright source off in the distance. But it feels more plausible to the brain and gives a better sense of darkness. It feels like some kind of industrial lighting. Or a security light at a junkyard.

Here he straight up shows you where the light is coming from. And his preference for anamorphic lenses.

And here he uses bright train lights to create silhouettes. This is clever because it allows everything to be very dark but everyone is still legible in the scene.

I'm torn. Because I study light. And so I am very aware of how shows and movies are lighting things. And unmotivated lighting sticks out in my brain. Like when I watch someone miming playing the guitar. Or using a camera improperly. When you know too much about something, inaccurate onscreen depictions just drive you nuts.

There are some techniques being experimented with to make night scenes more legible while maintaining lighting realism. I think the most promising is the infrared day-for-night process used in Nope.

But maybe it doesn't need to be solved. Maybe DPs should just light the night even if it doesn't always make sense. Maybe general audiences just do not care and I am a big nerd who should be ignored.

[pis3update]

SimTech 40" OLED Smart TV by vesko_sims3

"The SimTech 40" OLED TV combines sleek, modern aesthetics with an upgraded design, making it a stylish addition to any Sim’s home. With its OLED display, it delivers deep blacks and vibrant colors for an immersive viewing experience.

Quote: Product Description: It doesn’t get much better than the 40” OLED Smart TV by SimTech. With superior contrast, vibrant colors, and Crystal Clear UHD, it delivers breathtaking visuals in one resolution—awesome—thanks to cutting-edge OLED screen technology. Home entertainment has truly evolved, and with this TV, so has your viewing experience.

This TV is a remodeled version of the 36" HiFi Plasmondo TV, now featuring a larger 40" screen, thinner bezels, modernized stands, and a slimmer body. It includes two recolorable channels—one for the TV itself and one for the module—allowing for simplier customization. These are three presets - with wooden, marble and white finish module. In addition, the package contains translator in every language.

...continued + more pictures on MTS."

More Info + Download @ MTS.

[psychotrenny]

A lot of the talk around "cultural appropriation" is deeply misguided because it neglects the basic fact that a relationship of oppression must exist between the group who is taking cultural elements and the group that is being taken from. In present times this sort of oppression normally follows the lines of Imperialism, but cultural appropriation can very much occur within other social systems as well. A pre-Capitalist example of this is provided by the Kingdom of Bamum, the most powerful centralised state in the grasslands of what is now west Cameroon, which incorporated not only the art but also the artists of conquered peoples in order to enrich their culture, assert their political dominance and culturally integrate new subjects

Even though the Bamum may have possessed artistic capabilities and appropriate technology, the relocation of the artisans was a significant step in establishing Bamum dominance in the visual domain. Appropriating the artists themselves seems to be the logical extension of the tendency of dominant Grassfields states to take over and manipulate the visual symbols of subjugated populations, the regalia and emblems of the elite and of secret societies. Such objects were frequently not only displayed as war trophies but also integrated into the rituals of the victor's secret societies or into court ceremonies, becoming a constant reminder of the victors' superiority. The conquered artists' work for the Bamum court served a similar purpose and also enhanced the court's overall wealth and prestige. The Bamum thus perfected the system of visual conquest by appropriating not only the objects of those they conquered but also the creators of the objects themselves. At the same time, their work for the court must have been a strong integrative factor for the kingdom as a whole

Christraud Geary (1981) Bamum Thrones and Stools, African Arts Volume 14 Issue 4

[knight-a3]

Hazbin Masterpost

Heavenbound Masterpost

Vox, the noisy video box

So Vox may not be my favorite character, but he is probably my favorite redesign. I laugh every time I look at him now. He looks like a weird mix of Spongebob, Kraang(TMNT), and Mr. Electric(Sharkboy and Lavagirl). He absolutely hates it.

Notes under the cut

There's too many twinks in this show. So when I was trying to decide which characters I could change, for body diversity, Vox was an obvious one. He needed more bulk so his body could conceivably support the old TV models. Those things could get heavy. The change also had the side effect of making him shorter, which just worked better proportionately.

I liked the idea that Vox could never get rid of his original bulky 50s TV, but also wanted him to be able to upgrade. So I decided his true body is the 50s TV, and he adds an upgraded monitor for a head as technology improves. He's hates that he's stuck as an old fashioned TV, so he hides that under his suit. Since the monitor is just an addition, it can be swapped out easily. It can be damaged and he's technically unharmed. But he can't see through his suit without the monitor, unless he wants to use a security camera and direct himself 3rd person style.

I didn't like that basically everyone has sharp teeth. It reduces the impact for characters like Alastor or Rosie. So I've been having the default be just sharp canines. But with Vox being a TV, there are so many possibilities. I gave Vox "regular" teeth, which helps him look more trustworthy. It fits the corrupt businessman vibe. But the appearance can change with his mood too.

Color TV became available in the 50s, so Vox always had color vision. But I think it'd be funny if, early on, he had a tendency to glitch out by going into black and white vision when he gets worked up. He's mostly grown out of that glitch, but he can't seem to shake the static or TV color bars, and developed new ones as he integrated computer and internet tech into himself as well. Now he gets the Blue Screen of Death, system errors, and city wide power surges.

Messing around with his face is so fun. When he's bored or tired a Voxtech logo will bounce around like the DVD logo, or display a screensaver. His face can get too big for the screen when he's excited, or be small when he's feeling embarrassed. I need to put a troll face on him at some point. It may be an old meme, but man, it feels right.

His left eye turns red when it's hypnotic, to reference those blue and red 3D glasses.

Of the three Vees, he is absolutely the most powerful. Val and Vel are the content creators, but Vox is the platform. The other two, while still powerful in their own right, would never have gotten to the level they're at if it weren't for Vox. He controls the mainstream media.

--TV set--

So we've got some interesting implications with how he functions. He's a TV, but he blue screens like a computer, and he shorts out the power grid. I think it's safe to say he is more than just a TV, he's a multimedia entertainment center. That, and TVs are starting to really blend with computers these days. He's mainstream media.

At some point, I realized that a TV set was a "set" because it wasn't just a single device. A television set was a collection of components, which boils down to a radio hooked up and synchronized to a visual display. I bring this up mostly because I am a sucker for one-sided radiostatic. It's so funny to me. Vox is obsessed.

But I'm going to refrain from too much theorizing about their relationship. Alastor is absolutely not interested in romance. Nor a QPR. He's not even interested in friendship. Alastor is too invested in power dynamics to really consider anyone a friend. Mimzy is probably the closest he has to a friend, and even that has manipulative elements on both sides. But I'm supposed to be talking about Vox!

--Human Vox!--

He is not tall, haha. But his proportions are a bit taller than his demon form. I wanted to go for square glasses, but I didn't see many examples of that in the 50s photos I found. Oh well! My goal was a sleazy business man. He probably had a variety of jobs, but they primarily involved TV. Commercials, PR, interviews, news, game shows, talk shows, screenwriting, etc. Whatever he could do to get more influence. He found himself favoring the business end of things. Making deals and pulling strings. He decided what would go on the air. He's one of those network executive types.

I see lots of people give him heterochromia, but I don't really see a point to that. He hypnotizes people with his left eye, sure, but it's not a different color. It's not disfigured in any way either. Maybe he just had a tendency to wink at people, I dunno.

I think his death involved some sort of severe skull fracture focused around his left eye. Maybe a car accident, maybe he was shot, idk. Maybe seizures were involved. But he was somewhere in his mid 40s to early 50s. I ended up writing 45, but I'm not super committed to that or anything.

For a human name, I see lots of people calling him Vincent and that's sorta grown on me. So I might go with "Vincent Cox".

And because I fell into another research rabbit hole...

--TV evolution--

(below) 50s-60s CRT TV: TV sets were treated as furniture and there could be some very interesting cabinet designs. Color TV was introduced in the 50s, but wasn't quite profitable until the late 60s.

(below) 70s-80s CRT TV: Color TV became more affordable and commonplace.

(below) 90s CRT TV

(below) 2000s CRT to Plasma and LCD TVs: The three display technologies competed, but LCD won out in the end. Plasma and early LCD didn't look substantially different. Plasma was a little bulkier, but was still slimmer than CRT.

2010s and on: LCD improved with LED backlighting. But then OLED removed the need for backlighting entirely, which mixed the benefits of plasma and LCD. (Didn't bother to find a picture example. It's so close to modern at this point)

--Display technology-- (These overviews are very simplified)

CRT(Cathode Ray Tube)--Used through the 1900s to approx 2010. Monochromatic until Color TV developed aroung the 1950s. Worked via vacuum tubes and electron gun that lit up the pixels. They were bulky, heavy, and used a whole lot of power. Widely considered obsolete and no longer made. Video games made while these were in use tend to look better in CRT, since the graphics accounted for the image quality.

Flat screens-

PDP (Plasma Display Panel): Used from early 2000s to approx 2015. Used gas cells that light up pixels when electrically charged. Good image quality and good contrast, but expensive, heavy, and used a lot of power. Considered obsolete and no longer made, despite still having a desirable image quality.

Plasma and LCD competed in the 2000s to early 2010s as CRT popularity waned. LCD eventually won out due to weight and overall cost(including market price and energy efficiency).

LCD (Liquid Crystal Display): Introduced for TV around the same time as Plasma. Works via a liquid crystal layer with a backlight. Slim, decent image quality, energy efficient. Viewing angle matters because image colors are warped at wide angles. Cheaper than plasma. There are two main backlighting types:

--CCFL(Cold Cathode Fluorescent Light): Used fluorescent lighting for the backlight. Image quality was decent, but didn't have good contrast. (the blacks were never truly dark because of the backlight)

--LED(Light Emitting Diode): An LCD that uses LEDs instead of CCFL for the backlighting. Better contrast and efficiency than using CCFL.

OLED(Organic LED): Mixes strengths of plasma and LCD. Self emitting LEDs. No backlight or LCD panel needed, which improves contrast(about as good as plasma was, which is why plasma is basically obsolete now).

--QD-OLED(Quantum Dot- OLED) Adds a layer of Quantum dots to an OLED to improve color gamut. I think. I can't let myself fall too far into this rabbit hole, so I'm not double checking anymore.

((Feb 12, 2025-updated tags)