#Domain Name Generator

[idevlive]

best hosting service provider

iHost is your go-to solution for top-notch hosting and domain registration services. As a leading server provider, we pride ourselves on delivering reliable, secure, and high-performance hosting solutions tailored to meet the diverse needs of our clients. Whether you're launching a personal blog, a business website, or managing a complex online platform, iHost offers a range of hosting plans that guarantee optimal speed, uptime, and scalability. Our robust infrastructure ensures that your website or application operates seamlessly, backed by a team of experts committed to providing exceptional support. In addition to hosting services, iHost simplifies your online presence by offering efficient domain registration services, allowing you to secure the perfect domain name for your brand. Experience the power of seamless hosting and domain solutions with iHost, where your digital success is our priority.

[stella-chen-197]

Discover top AI-powered domain name generators to find creative, catchy, and brandable names for your business or startup.

[nevertoomanyspiders]

concepts for some of Rumble's friends, yaaay.

[is-your-post-a-domain-name]

thelastdropofjuicethatsstillinthebottle.watch/ing-you-recycle-it is $5.98 a year

the last drop of juice thats still in the bottle watching you recycle it

[namelixpro]

Naming a Business Just Got Smarter

Ever spent hours trying to come up with a brand name that’s unique, catchy, and still has a domain available? We get it — naming is hard.

That’s why Namelix exists.

🚀 What Is Namelix?

Namelix is an AI-powered business name generator that helps you find short, brandable names in seconds. Whether you're launching a startup, building an app, starting a blog, or rebranding your shop, Namelix can spark your next big idea.

Just enter a keyword, choose your preferred style (short, brandable, compound, etc.), and let the AI generate a list of fresh names. It’s that easy.

🎨 Why People Use Namelix

✔️ AI-driven creativity – Names generated using advanced algorithms ✔️ Fast and simple – Get dozens of ideas instantly ✔️ Domain check built-in – See domain availability on the spot ✔️ Customizable filters – Control length, style, and randomness ✔️ Totally free – No account required to get started

💡 Who Is It For?

Startups looking to stand out

Solo creators launching products, blogs, or YouTube channels

Agencies helping clients with brand identity

Side hustlers starting an Etsy store or digital product

Anyone who needs a name and doesn't want to spend weeks brainstorming

🌐 Try It Out

👉 Go to namelix.pro Type your keyword. Select your style. And let AI do the naming magic. ✨

[is-your-post-a-domain-name]

reallyhasitsfingeronthepulseofth.ing/s is $12.98 a year

I remembered newspaper comics existed and googled Ziggy to laugh at how shitty it is and this caught me so off guard I nearly threw up

[ilovewebtoolz]

📢 Welcome to ILoveWebTools.com! 📢

We’re thrilled to have you here! At ILoveWebTools, our mission is simple: to make powerful, easy-to-use web tools accessible to everyone—for free. From file conversions to SEO insights, our tools are designed to help you work smarter without the hassle of downloads or fees.

Whether you're a tech pro or just looking to simplify your online tasks, we’ve got something for you. Explore, share, and let us know how we can help make your digital experience easier! 🌐💻✨

👉 Visit us at ILoveWebTools.com

[chickenroost]

no means no!

I swear… NOT AGAIN! It seems like every time I buy a domain name, over the last several years, I get these stupid spam calls , not long afterwards, where they either claim to want to buy my domain name from me, or gain access to my websites. to "help me with designing and maintaining them." it's always the same stupid sounding guy with an accent who can't pronounce my first name, it always makes a bloop sound before he talks, and he always knows the domain name and ignores the fact I already have a website attached to said domain names. I always tell him no and to not call. and he calls from a different number every time.

[stella-chen-197]

The blog post "Best AI-Powered Domain Finders: Top 7 Tools For 2025" on UniqDomain.com highlights seven AI-driven tools that simplify domain name selection. These tools, including UniqDomain's own AI, Namecheap, GoDaddy, Domain Name Brain, NameMesh, Instant Domain Search, and Domain Puzzler, offer features like keyword-based suggestions, TLD filtering, and availability checks. They aim to streamline the process of finding unique, brandable, and available domain names, making it easier for users to establish their online presence.

[is-your-post-a-domain-name]

withtswiftdeadthatsstillanetwinfortheenviron.men/t is $5.98 a year

Taylor swift has fallen down into a scary hole

[gettechdomain]

A domain registration platform that specialises in offering .tech top-level domains.

 We are your one-stop destination for innovative and tech-savvy startup domain names.You can discover a wide range of premium domains and tech business names designd to launch your tech startup or tech blog. Whether you're starting a tech business, launching a new app, or creating a tech blog, our platform provides the ideal tech business names to help you stand out in the tech industry. If you want to explore creative and professional domains that align with your tech vision then do check our website.

[victorwinnersdotcom]

How to Choose a Domain Name for a Professional Website

Before setting up a website, one of the key things to put in place is to choose a domain name that is suitable for your brand, relevant to your business and capable of delivering your expected outcomes. For most beginners, choosing the right domain name can get really daunting and confusing when you do not know how to get started. Apart from cases where one’s preferred domain can get taken up…

[is-your-post-a-domain-name]

iwasintheparktodayandmerged3babiesinstrollersinto.one/man for $1.98 a year

[batboyblog]

Copy Right and Public Domain in 2025!

It's January 1st 2025 which means it's my favorite unsung holiday! Public Domain Day! This is the day once a year when, in the US, copyrights expire and things enter the public domain, meaning they belong to everyone! even you, Steve!

American copyright for books, movies, art work, and musical compositions (but not recordings, more on that later) runs for 95 years (way too long!) so today works published in 1929 join us in the public domain.

So whats free? so glad you asked.

Popeye the Sailor Man

Many people assume Popeye originated as a cartoon character but thats not true, he comes from a comic strip. The strip was called Thimble Theatre and Popeye was something of a late addition. Thimble Theatre was first published in 1919, so Popeye's girlfriend Olive Oyl has been in the public domain since before the big 20 year copyright freeze of 1998-2019. Popeye first appeared as a minor character 10 years into the strip's run but was so popular he soon took over and the strip would be renamed Popeye less than 5 years later. Now as always whats public is only what appears in 1929, later developments, remain copyrighted. Such as, while Popeye always had super strength its not till 1932 his superpowers were tied to eating spinach, and Olive Oyl originally had a different boyfriend named Ham Gravy, who she dumped for Popeye when he became the main character. It looks like Popeye is following tradition for famous now public domain characters and getting a quicky horror movie this year.

Tintin!

This is personally very exciting as someone who grew up with the Belgian boy detective. Like Popeye I expect a lot of people don't know that Tintin started off as a weekly comic strip. Indeed Tintin appeared as a part of a weekly youth supplement in the Catholic newspaper The Twentieth Century. Any ways, Tintin was first published in there in January 1929, and soon would start what would become the first Tintin story, Tintin in the Land of the Soviets. Now only part of Tintin in the Land of the Soviets was published in 1929, the story line wrapped up in May 1930, so only those 1929 stories and what appears in them is free and clear and Tintin was published in black and white not color. Tintin's author Hergé had no idea what he was doing and was really learning on the job so In The Land of the Soviets is generally seen as his weakest outing and the only one he never opted to redraw in later years. Even so it's nice to see the character free in the world. No word on if Tintin will star in a horror movie.

Buck Rogers (but not really)

The original futuristic space man was published, again a comic strip, in 1929 which means he should enter the public domain today, but he won't. That's because he already is public domain! Before the Copyright Act of 1976 copyright was 28 years with the option to renew for another 28 years. The copyright on the original comic strips was not renewed so ran out at the end of 28 years, 1958. So Buck Rogers has been free and clear for close to 70 years now, whatever you hear about him today.

What else?

Famously last year Mickey Mouse entered the public domain, but all the entered public domain was one (maybe two) animated short, Steamboat Willie. Well this year a dozen Mickey Mouse animated shorts enter the public domain, including the first time Mickey has his iconic white gloves, and the first time Mickey speaks (the first thing Mickey Mouse ever says, voiced by Walt Disney himself, is "Hot dogs! Hot dogs!" in case you were wondering) This will give creators much more to work with if they want to use Mickey in their works which is exciting.

Speaking of Walt Disney, The Skeleton Dance is entering public domain, you likely don't know the title but I suspect you've seen at least part of it at some point

so look for this showing up on TVs in the backgrounds of films and TV shows in the next year or so

Books

The iconic novels of World War I, Ernest Hemingway's A Farewell to Arms and Erich Maria Remarque's All Quiet on the Western Front enter public domain. In fact All Quiet on the Western Front entered public domain last year, but only in the original German, the 1929 translation by Arthur Wesley Wheen is whats entered the public domain now. John Steinbeck's first novel, Cup of Gold, William Faulkner's The Sound and the Fury, Virginia Woolf's A Room of One's Own, and Agatha Christie's Seven Dials Mystery (always get an Agatha Christie novel on this list for the rest of our lives). Dashiell Hammett published both Red Harvest and The Maltese Falcon, later made into one of the greatest films of all time, in 1929. Future children's book author E. B. White (who's go on to write Charlotte's Web and Stuart Little) and future New Yorker cartoonist and humorist James Thurber teamed up to write the delightfully titled Is Sex Necessary? Or, Why You Feel the Way You Do a book of spoof essays making fun of popular books on Freudian sexual theories at the time. The Roman Hat Mystery the first of the long running Ellery Queen mysteries was published, Queen would keep publishing mysteries into the 1970s (and Ellery Queen was a pen name for two people). Richard Hughes' A High Wind in Jamaica and Oliver La Farge's Laughing Boy also came out in 1929 and are in the public domain now. There's much else but those are the highlights sorry if I missed your favorite 1929 novel.

Movies

Alfred Hitchcock and Cecil B. DeMille's first movies with sound, Blackmail and Dynamite respectively, came out in 1929. Marx Brothers' first feature film The Cocoanuts joins the public domain. Other comedy land marks are Harold Lloyd's first sound film, Welcome Danger and Buster Keaton's last silent film, Spite Marriage (which Keaton also directed). John Ford's first sound film, The Black Watch, which also is 21 year old John Wayne's first appearance in a film, as an uncredited extra, he worked in the art department. Hallelujah the first studio film to have an all black cast came out that year. Also worth noting is The Hollywood Revue of 1929 a singing and dancing review, one of the earliest and the movie that popularized the song Singin’ in the Rain, maybe the first time a movie made a song a hit.

Musical compositions

musical compositions, ie the lyrics and musical notations you might see on sheet music are governed by the 1976 Copyright Act, and music written in 1929 is public domain. Music recordings are governed by a whole different law (we'll get there). Songs written in 1929 include Singin’ in the Rain by Arthur Freed & Nacio Herb Brown, Ain’t Misbehavin’ and Black and Blue by the legendary Fats Waller, What Is This Thing Called Love? by Cole Porter, Tiptoe Through the Tulips by Alfred Dubin, You Were Meant for Me by Arthur Freed & Nacio Herb Brown, and also Happy Days Are Here Again by Jack Yellen which would become FDR's campaign theme song in 1932.

Art!

a number of pieces by Salvador Dalí including:

Illumined Pleasures

The Accommodations of Desire

The Great Masturbator

are entering the public domain as is René Magritte’s The Treachery of Images.

Art is hard because while movies and books are clearly "published" and put on sale, what counts as "published" for a piece of art? the law is not totally sure.

Musical Recordings

as I promised, we got here. Till 2017 there were no federal laws governing the copyright of music recordings before the 1970s, it was governed by a confusing patchwork of state laws and it was not totally clear what was or was not free and clear even from the very earliest recordings ever. Now the term of a music recording's copyright is set at 100 years (way too long) so music recorded in 1924 is now public domain such as. Nobody Knows the Trouble I’ve Seen by Marian Anderson, Everybody Loves My Baby (But My Baby Don’t Love Nobody But Me) by Louis Armstrong, California Here I Come by Al Jolson, Rhapsody in Blue by George Gershwin, Shreveport Stomp by Jelly Roll Morton, Mama’s Gone, Good Bye by Ray Miller, and It Had To Be You by Marion Harris. Now many recordings a lot less famous can finally be preserved and digitized to save them for the next 100 years. Many abandoned works are literally rotting away since without the copyright holder's permission digitizing a work isn't legal.

[littlefankingdom]

Bruce is a overprotective and kind of strict parent, but he is very lax in some domains where other parents wouldn't. Here are some examples:

His kids stealing money from him. You will never catch Bruce Wayne lecturing his kids for taking his money. In the Arkhamverse, Jason steals 5 millions from Bruce's bank account to buy his army, and the problems for Bruce are: he didn't know it was Jason so it stressed him a bit, and Jason used it to buy an army.

Stealing from him in general. What is his is theirs. Unless it's dangerous. (Cars are death machines for his anxious self, which is why buying another batmobile for the young justice is not acceptable, or is kids taking it for a ride. He did made Redbird for Tim as a gift for when he got his license.)

Stealing from the cops (he has done it himself so many times)

Stealing money from rich people. In Knightfall, Bruce meets a British vigilante named Hood who steals from the rich to give to the poor, and Bruce had NO problems with that. He likes the young man. Stealing possessions is an issue tho. (Dick should follow his Robin Hood's dream, his father is fine with that)

Hacking into government facilities or anything really. Unless it's to harm an innocent civilian, like a classmate, he will not say anything. Hacking the FBI? Good. Hacking a russian mafia? Ok. As long as they do it safely and follow Barbara's instructions, it's fine.

Lying to him. Bruce is always impressed when he realizes one of his kids lied to him and he believed them. He's the Batman, after all, they have been able to fool the Batman. When he learns that Tim invented a fake uncle, he is proud of him and he tells him such, because he made the Batman believed it.

[feminist-space]

"Balaji’s death comes three months after he publicly accused OpenAI of violating U.S. copyright law while developing ChatGPT, a generative artificial intelligence program that has become a moneymaking sensation used by hundreds of millions of people across the world.

Its public release in late 2022 spurred a torrent of lawsuits against OpenAI from authors, computer programmers and journalists, who say the company illegally stole their copyrighted material to train its program and elevate its value past $150 billion.

The Mercury News and seven sister news outlets are among several newspapers, including the New York Times, to sue OpenAI in the past year.

In an interview with the New York Times published Oct. 23, Balaji argued OpenAI was harming businesses and entrepreneurs whose data were used to train ChatGPT.

“If you believe what I believe, you have to just leave the company,” he told the outlet, adding that “this is not a sustainable model for the internet ecosystem as a whole.”

Balaji grew up in Cupertino before attending UC Berkeley to study computer science. It was then he became a believer in the potential benefits that artificial intelligence could offer society, including its ability to cure diseases and stop aging, the Times reported. “I thought we could invent some kind of scientist that could help solve them,” he told the newspaper.

But his outlook began to sour in 2022, two years after joining OpenAI as a researcher. He grew particularly concerned about his assignment of gathering data from the internet for the company’s GPT-4 program, which analyzed text from nearly the entire internet to train its artificial intelligence program, the news outlet reported.

The practice, he told the Times, ran afoul of the country’s “fair use” laws governing how people can use previously published work. In late October, he posted an analysis on his personal website arguing that point.

No known factors “seem to weigh in favor of ChatGPT being a fair use of its training data,” Balaji wrote. “That being said, none of the arguments here are fundamentally specific to ChatGPT either, and similar arguments could be made for many generative AI products in a wide variety of domains.”

Reached by this news agency, Balaji’s mother requested privacy while grieving the death of her son.

In a Nov. 18 letter filed in federal court, attorneys for The New York Times named Balaji as someone who had “unique and relevant documents” that would support their case against OpenAI. He was among at least 12 people — many of them past or present OpenAI employees — the newspaper had named in court filings as having material helpful to their case, ahead of depositions."