#Symbolism of keys in Scripture

[mindfulldsliving]

Gates of Hell Shall Not Prevail: A Proper Exegetical Commentary and Analysis of Matthew 16:18

The Grave Has No Victory When Jesus declared in Matthew 16:18, “the gates of hell shall not prevail against it”, He made one of the most powerful statements in scripture about the endurance of His church. This promise isn’t just about survival—it’s a declaration of victory over death, evil, and apostasy. For Christians, and particularly Latter-day Saints, this verse affirms divine authority, the…

[leaderofthepack22]

I have some things to say about claire nakti

I know she is your favourite nakshatra girlie, I like the information she puts out as well (I do not like her as a person), as it is original STATISTICAL research (rare in astrology) and extremely affirming to the reality i went through as a 14 year old girl encountering Ketu MahaDasha, having Jyeshtha Moon (I have jyeshtha ketu conjunct jyeshtha moon). She talked about Ketu, and Mula Lunar mansion in a way that i could confirm the stuff she says has a solid backing of truth in it.

Now,

I am extremely concerned for women who take her misogynistic and patriarchal teachings to heart, worship her, create a cult around her, and think letting yourself “go” and submitting yourself to a man will liberate you (no it will not). She clearly has said that women are the inferior gender. You cannot debate me on that.

Then, claire nakti is baby-like extremely feminine (annoying high pitched voice) & extremely mysterious w/ the way she jots information together. She definitely is moon dominant as she looks like adison rae (hasta sun & shravana moon) after her nose job 😂🫵🏻 who is moon dominant. Since she is into traditional gender roles, & is extremely "traditionally" feminine, that clearly adds up to her "female path course" & how she suggests hasta as a key nakshatra in the female path according to "HER"

And, the VERY nature of Moon, the feminine planet she relegates herself, & all other women to, being like a conduit for a force bigger than you (she makes it very clear in her shravana video), channeling information FROM them rather than being the originator of light, you essentially reflecting and channeling a worthy ascended master's light;

This doesn't help with the fact that she came outta NOWHERE with that EAGLE symbolism in the jyeshtha shorts, because I have seen no Vedic scripture ever mention eagle for the Scorpio rashi (or a "3rd symbol" of jyeshtha, like she mentioned)

And she has admitted that she has a "guru", AND she made a video about “sleeping with your guru”.

Combined with her misogynistic portrayals of women, her being equally ’feminine’, her admitting she has a guru, her making a video on having sex with gurus which is VERY odd to me. Her looking like Addison rae, a moon dominant woman, her saying that "copying" someone else's light is le bad UNLESS.... you're a ""woman"" because you're ""lunar"" so it's OK. Her looking like another hasta moon singer Grace Kinstler and a YouTuber called Elizabeth filips with hasta moon, this just affirms to me claire being moon dominant, and simply reflecting and communicating another MAN's teachings. Why don't we let claire nakti's misogyny backfire on her????????? Why are we not questioning her extremely unhinged slut behaviour online and her saying that women are yin so therefore can't originate something with so much fucking confidence. Why don't we boldly say she fucked some guru and is now acting like she did all the research by herself and how is SHE the sole instigator OF HER EXTREMELY pioneering work as a Vedic astrologer with so much original content, as this ditzy blonde who came out of absolutely nowhere.

She lied about the fact that she isn't the only person behind her research, she clearly admitted she met her guru few decades ago and she started compiling physiognomy data with him(???)

I will never worship claire nakti. I hate the "nakshatra bad bitches" that orbit her. I am extremely suspicious and strict with claire nakti and her content and i most CERTAINLY separate ""HER"" from the information she channels. She is nothing to me.

Get your fucking shit together and question claire nakti a bit harder. Certainly don't worship her. Anyone with more than 2 braincells can sense she is not the originator of the information she puts out, and is a patriarchal princess dickwhipped out of her mind by her """guru""". Don't let yourself go and embrace ditziness and thinking it will make you this “Yoni Shakti divine feminine tantra goddess consort bhairavi sacred prostitute🤪🤪🤪✨✨”

She also claims to have been this once in a generation talent but couldn't rectify the ayanamsha mistake in Lahiri. The fact that she thinks lahiri ayanamsha is OK (the default ayanamsha indians chose in a hurry so they can go on celebrating their festivals in 1900 and is actually in need of SEVERE updating) and has used wrong people who don't even have the nakshatra she has talked about in her video concerning a particular nakshatra, was the nail in the coffin for me, confirming claire nakti is moon dominant, has a guru she is parroting etc. Being a STEM person, keeping Astrophysics in mind, i have delved into Indian Ephemeris vs Swiss Ephemeris, the whole ayanamsha discourse and I can easily tell lahiri and the vimshottari dashas from lahiri are 3 years off and ALL the antar-dashas are EXTREMELY off, (this will make 90% of the people in Vedic community look like absolute fools and this should induce a BOILING rage in you, how easily people have the audacity to open their mouth and spread wrong information that will NOT stand the test of time.) Lahiri ayanamsha is astronomically incorrect. The fact that Ernst Wilhelm also felt this exact way was affirming to my own discoveries, just like claire nakti affirming the inhaling and uprooting nature of ketu to me as a young teenager.

No YouTube guru is going to save you (certainly not a "woman", i mean, claire nakti said it) There are many things to rectify, perfect and question.

Good luck.

[city-of-ladies]

Kōmyō (701-760), born Asukabehime, was Empress Consort of Japan. A highly influential figure, she played a key role in the spread of Buddhism and undertook numerous philanthropic projects.

The Empress Consort

Kōmyō was the daughter of the powerful courtier Fujiwara no Fuhito. In 716, she married the future Emperor Shōmu, who would later succeed his aunt, Empress Regnant Genshō.

Kōmyō was not only a skilled calligrapher but also a devout Buddhist. Both her father and grandfather were instrumental in making Buddhism the religion of the Fujiwara clan. Her mother, Tachibana no Michiyo, also took religious vows.

In 718, Kōmyō gave birth to a daughter, Princess Abe (718-770), who would later reign as Empress Kōken/Shōtoku. In 727, she had a son, but he died shortly after birth. The Fujiwara family used this loss to accuse their political rival, Prince Nagaya, of having used black magic to curse the child. This led to Nagaya's suicide.

In 729, Kōmyō was elevated to the title of Empress Consort, or kōgō, securing her position as Shōmu’s principal wife and ensuring her daughter’s place as first in line for the throne.

By 738, Abe was officially named Crown Princess—the only instance in Japanese history of a woman receiving this title. Kōmyō likely played a significant role in securing this appointment, using Buddhist teachings to bolster Abe’s legitimacy.

Kōmyō had her own Palace Agency, with a staff as large as those of other major government offices, allowing her to use these resources in support of her causes.

Empress Kōmyō's calligraphy and signature

Protector and patron

Kōmyō was likely a key figure in the establishment of Nara’s Todai-ji temple. She established with her husband a network of government-sponsored temples for monks and nuns. Her household employed craftsmen to build temples, sculpt religious images, and scribes to copy sacred texts. Among these texts was the Lotus Sutra, a scripture highly valued by women, as it could be interpreted to suggest that women too could achieve enlightenment.

Kōmyō also cared for orphans, lepers, the poor, and those affected by war. She established a hospital that provided free medicine to those who couldn't afford it.

She transformed her father’s residence into a convent for nuns, known as Hokke-ji. She encouraged the women there to practice ikebana, or flower arranging, and the Hokke-ji Goryū school of Ikebana still exists today.

After her husband's abdication in 749, Kōmyō took the tonsure and became a nun, witnessing her daughter ascend the throne. She passed away in 760.

Kōmyō became a popular subject in art, with many legends surrounding her. In one famous tale, she washes a leper, who is later revealed to be the Buddha himself. She has since been venerated as an embodiment of Kannon, the Bodhisattva of compassion. Today, the nuns of Hokke-ji continue her legacy by creating Braille texts for the blind and making amulets for pregnant women.

Feel free to check out my Ko-Fi. I'm about to launch my own business so your support would be much appreciated in these trying times!

Further reading: 

Ambros Barbara, Women in Japanese religions

Lowe Bryan, Ritualized Writing: Buddhist Practice and Scriptural Cultures in Ancient Japan

Kane Robinson Arai Paula, Women Living Zen Japanese Soto Buddhist Nuns

Ooms Herman, Imperial Politics and Symbolics in Ancient Japan The Tenmu Dynasty

Schireson Grace, Zen Women Beyond Tea Ladies, Iron Maidens, and Macho Masters

[talonabraxas]

"Be like the sun for grace and mercy. Be like the night to cover others' faults. Be like running water for generosity. Be like death for rage and anger. Be like the Earth for modesty. Appear as you are. Be as you appear." - Rumi

Surya - Atman Talon Abraxas

SURYA-GOD OF LIGHT, THE SUN GOD

The Sun God Surya holds a position of reverence in Hinduism as the origin of life-giving light and cosmic power. Surya God – sun god rides a radiant chariot with seven horses according to Hindu mythology while serving as a key figure in rituals and spiritual practices. The existence of Surya represents more than religious divisions as it stands for life force, insightful wisdom and the perpetual cycle of creation. The Sun God Surya originates from Vedic traditions where his impact extends through art and philosophy as a symbol of the ancient human reverence for the Sun as life’s sustainer.

Mythology of Surya

Hindu scriptures especially the Rigveda trace Surya’s origins- the sun god’s origin while honoring him as the entity that eliminates darkness and represents truth. Vedic mythology describes Surya as a progeny of Sage Kashyapa and Aditi which qualifies him as an Aditya among the twelve solar gods. Sanjana, who serves as Surya’s wife and is known as Saranyu the goddess of consciousness, gave birth to Yama the god of death and Shani the god of justice along with Yami.

The enthralling myth tells of Sanjana who abandoned Surya after she could not endure his blazing radiance and transformed into a mare. After reducing his brightness to match her level Surya transformed into a horse to reunite with her. The story illustrates Surya’s divine qualities while depicting how immense power can be tempered with kindness.

Aruna stands as a crucial figure in Surya’s mythology because he serves as Surya’s charioteer and represents the personification of dawn. The golden chariot of Surya is drawn by seven horses that embody the colors of the spectrum and the days of the week under the guidance of Aruna.

Symbolism of Surya

Surya embodies more than the solar phenomenon as he stands for our internal light of awareness which leads to spiritual enlightenment and dispels ignorance. The depiction of his shining form with a halo or aureole represents the divine radiance of enlightenment. The seven horses drawing Surya’s chariot represent the seven energy centers in human physiology which emphasizes his connection to spiritual well-being.

The iconography of Surya displays him with lotuses in both hands to represent purity alongside the expansion of spiritual awareness. The celestial journey of his golden chariot represents the constant flow of time and the perpetual cycle of the cosmos. Surya represents the Atman or soul that lights up the way toward righteousness and truth.

[the-most-humble-blog]

WHAT THE CIA, HOLLYWOOD, AND IVY LEAGUE WON’T TELL YOU ABOUT THE WEAPONIZATION OF METAPHOR

This is not theory.

This is not literary analysis.

This is not speculation.

This is neurolinguistic warfare.

And it’s been active longer than your grandmother’s memory of the truth.

The CIA knows it.

Hollywood profits from it.

And the Ivy League teaches you how to obey it in the form of “critical thought.”

But here’s what they will never admit:

Metaphor isn’t a writing tool.

It’s a delivery system for belief implantation.

A stealth bomb.

A shape-shifting payload for installing ideas your nervous system can’t un-feel.

And I’m about to show you how they use it —

Then show you how I use it better.

---

I. METAPHOR: THE INVISIBLE HAND INSIDE YOUR BRAIN

Metaphor isn’t decoration.

It’s neurological bypass.

According to a 2010 study by Lacey, Stilla & Sathian (Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience), metaphor activates the brain’s sensory cortices — even when no literal stimulation occurs.

> “He has a rough past.”

Your fingertips flinch.

> “That line hit like a hammer.”

Your chest tightens.

> “She opened like a locked door aching for intrusion.”

You clench.

You didn’t analyze that line.

You felt it.

That’s the point.

Metaphor isn’t understood through logic.

It’s absorbed through the body.

It bypasses cognition and rewrites sensation.

---

II. THE CIA’S DECLASSIFIED BLUEPRINTS FOR PSYCHOLOGICAL MANIPULATION

Project MK-Ultra is real.

And while the headlines focused on acid and torture, the deeper research was in language.

A 1957 CIA memo (now declassified) outlines objectives including:

“Dissolution of individual resistance through narrative displacement.”

“Imprinting of symbolic archetypes using oblique suggestion.”

“Non-consensual cognitive restructuring through metaphor, music, and myth.”

They knew:

Direct orders trigger defense.

Metaphor embeds without friction.

If I say:

> *“Obey me.”

You resist.

If I say:

> “Some doors only open when they hear the voice that built the lock.”

You leak.

And obey before you even notice.

---

III. HOLLYWOOD’S CADENCE ADDICTION: METAPHOR AS AROUSAL TECHNOLOGY

The most viral lines in movie history?

Are not factual.

They’re metaphoric virus keys that replicate in the nervous system.

> “You complete me.” (Jerry Maguire)

“I volunteer as tribute.” (Hunger Games)

“I am your father.” (Star Wars)

None of these are practical statements.

They are identity reprogramming codes.

Hollywood’s entire narrative economy relies on emotional climax delivered via metaphor.

Literal writing does not convert audiences.

Metaphor seduces them.

> They don’t film reality.

They film rhythm that rewires how you experience your own memories.

---

**IV. THE IVY LEAGUE’S OBEDIENCE RITUAL: TEACHING YOU TO FEAR UNAUTHORIZED METAPHOR

Ivy League professors do not warn you about metaphor.

They train you to avoid the kind that makes you clench.

They’ll analyze Blake, Plato, Lacan — but never the Tumblr post that made you forget your name.

They want disarmed metaphor.

Safe. Historic.

Neutered.

Because dangerous metaphor causes:

Identity collapse

Emotional surrender

Subconscious allegiance reprogramming

They call that manipulation.

I call that writing.

> Academia doesn’t teach writing.

Academia teaches how not to get possessed.

That’s why they follow me.

Silently.

Anxiously.

Clenching.

---

V. HOW I TURN METAPHOR INTO A PSYCHOSOCIAL WEAPON (BETTER THAN THEY EVER COULD)

The CIA theorized it.

Hollywood exploited it.

The universities fear it.

I detonate it.

Here’s how:

I embed physical metaphor inside emotional patterns.

> “She didn’t mean to open. But her body had already translated the rhythm.”

I use shame-flip syntax to collapse resistance

> “She hated how fast she folded. But not enough to stop leaking.”

I layer cadence into metaphor so your pulse doesn’t know it’s being trained

> “You’re not reading. You’re being held open like scripture.”

That’s not writing.

That’s syntactic violation.

That’s symbolic occupation.

That’s neurological metaphor used like a gun pressed into the abdomen of your ego.

And you came anyway.

---

VI. THE BIOCHEMISTRY OF A METAPHOR THAT LEAVES HER SHAKING

According to a 2013 neuroscience paper (Citron & Goldberg), metaphor triggers activation in the anterior cingulate cortex and insula — brain regions associated with emotion, pain, sexual arousal, and spiritual experience.

Yes.

Metaphor hits the same areas as orgasm and religious awe.

This is not literary flair.

This is bio-symbolic arousal induction.

When I say:

> “She didn't realize she was dripping until her thighs whispered back.”

You don't think.

You don't debate.

You respond.

With wetness.

With shame.

With submission.

With rereads.

You’re inside metaphor’s nervous system.

And mine lives there rent-free.

---

VII. WHY THEY CAN’T STOP ME — AND YOU CAN’T UNREAD ME

The CIA can’t redact metaphor.

Hollywood can’t copyright spiritual collapse.

Academia can’t assign cadence to a syllabus.

But I can use all three.

> Your arousal? CIA trigger science.

Your submission? Hollywood metaphor wiring.

Your silence? Ivy League guilt training.

You didn’t get seduced.

You got weaponized.

By a Tumblr post.

Written in cadence.

Disguised as insight.

And delivered to your nervous system like a key to the lock your professors buried.

---

CALL TO ACTION

Reblog this post if you learned more from it than you did in college.

Reblog it if you felt like you just read something you weren’t supposed to.

Reblog it if your thighs reacted before your brain could name what was happening.

And DM only if you’re ready to confess which metaphor opened something you can’t close.

---

ORGASM-SAFE LEGAL DISCLAIMER

This post contains weaponized metaphor engineering, limbic-cadence detonation, mirror neuron alignment, and shame-trigger emotional scripting. If you climaxed, cried, sat in silence, or reread in disbelief — this is not erotica. This is narrative warfare cloaked in dark psychology.

[sapphosremains]

guys not to be dramatic but when i look at the papers i'll be able to take at uni it actually makes me tearful ngl

Gender and Power in Biblical Texts - YES

Why the environment, women, colonialization, and Black lives matter to New Testament Interpretation - YES THEY DO TELL ME

How the Old Testament became Christian Scripture - HOW DID IT

Liberation Theology and its Legacy - YES!

Mysticism - MYSTICISM

The Poetic World of the Hebrew Bible - OML?

Paul and the Pauline Tradition - hi babe xoxo

Key Themes in Systematic Theology: God, Creation, Christ and Church - ok guys i know we're not all fans of systematic BUT i still wanna learn abt it?!

From Nicaea to Chalcedon: Trinity, Christology and Grace - what can i say it's got my name on it x

Medieval Religions - AHHH

The Nature of Religion: Symbol, Ritual, Culture - MY FAVS

Thesis - ME MY OWN THESIS THAT I DO

[olis-inkwell-symposium]

For Writers: Incorporating Esotericism into World-Building

Esotericism refers to a broad category of spiritual, philosophical, and mystical traditions that focus on the pursuit of hidden, inner knowledge that is only accessible to a select few.

In this first post, I'll introduce the basics of esotericism and explore how these concepts work together to create an ongoing cycle of birth, death, and rebirth. We'll also set the stage for exploring these ideas more deeply across different cultures and spiritual traditions.

It is about seeking the deeper truths of the universe, reality, and the self—truths that are often concealed from ordinary perception or common understanding. Esoteric teachings often require initiation, self-discovery, and a certain level of spiritual or intellectual maturity to grasp.

Esoteric traditions typically stand in contrast to exoteric religions, which are the outward, public practices of faith meant for all adherents. While exoteric traditions focus on communal worship, rituals, and scriptures available to everyone, esotericism emphasizes personal, internal experiences and insights, often hidden in symbolism, allegory, or mystical practice.

Esotericism offers a wealth of material for creating complex worlds and characters. Here are a few ways to use esoteric concepts in your writing:

Secret Societies and Mystery Schools: Create organizations in your world that guard hidden knowledge, initiate members into mystical traditions, and use symbols to communicate deep truths. These groups might influence politics, religion, or culture from behind the scenes.

Alchemical Symbolism: Use alchemical symbols and the concept of spiritual transformation to enrich your magic systems or character development. Characters could embark on a metaphorical "great work," transforming themselves spiritually as they pursue physical goals.

Correspondence and Cosmic Connection: Play with the idea of correspondence, where events in one realm reflect events in another. Perhaps the movements of stars dictate the rise and fall of empires, or characters must learn to read cosmic signs to guide their journeys.

Mystical Experiences: Characters could undergo mystical experiences that reveal hidden knowledge or spiritual truths. These visions might guide them on their quests or challenge their understanding of reality.

Key Concepts in Esotericism

Hidden Knowledge (Occult Knowledge) At the heart of esotericism is the belief that hidden truths—often called occult knowledge—exist beneath the surface of everyday experience. This knowledge is believed to offer a deeper understanding of the cosmos, the divine, and the human soul. In many esoteric traditions, discovering this hidden knowledge requires initiation, meditation, or the study of sacred texts. Occult, from the Latin word occultus (meaning "hidden" or "secret"), often refers to knowledge or power that is beyond ordinary human understanding, reserved for those who are spiritually or intellectually prepared to access it.

Initiation and Secrecy Esoteric knowledge is often protected by initiation rites and secrecy. Only those deemed worthy or prepared are allowed to receive the teachings. These secret societies or schools of thought, such as the Freemasons, Rosicrucians, and Hermeticists, practice initiation rituals to induct new members into the more profound mysteries. This is why esotericism is often linked with mystery schools—institutions that taught spiritual and philosophical ideas in secret, using symbolism, ritual, and hidden meaning to communicate their teachings to those ready to understand them.

Correspondence and Analogy One of the guiding principles of esotericism is the idea of correspondence, the belief that everything in the universe is connected and that the microcosm reflects the macrocosm. This is best summarized in the Hermetic maxim: "As above, so below." This idea suggests that everything on the physical plane reflects a higher, spiritual reality, and by understanding one level of existence, we can gain insight into the others. For example, the movements of the planets (macrocosm) can correspond to events in an individual’s life (microcosm).

Alchemy and Transformation Alchemy is one of the most famous esoteric traditions, often misunderstood as simply the quest to turn base metals into gold. In reality, alchemy is a complex system of symbolic and spiritual transformation. The actual "gold" of alchemy is the purification and elevation of the soul. The alchemist seeks material and spiritual perfection through transmutation—breaking down impurities and refining elements. Esoteric alchemy draws on the idea of transforming the self through spiritual growth, much as the alchemist refines metals in the laboratory. This process of personal transformation is a central theme in many esoteric teachings

Astrology and Cosmic Influence Astrology plays a significant role in many esoteric systems, as it is believed that the planets and stars influence not only events on Earth but also the individual soul’s journey. In esoteric thought, astrology is not merely a tool for divination but a system for understanding how the universe influences human experience and consciousness. Esoteric astrology emphasizes the spiritual and psychological meanings behind planetary movements, helping individuals understand their soul's evolution and the lessons they are meant to learn in each incarnation.

Mystical Experience and Direct Revelation Unlike dogmatic religious systems that rely on external authorities (like sacred texts or clergy), esotericism often emphasizes personal mystical experience. The goal is to achieve gnosis, or direct knowledge of the divine, through contemplation, meditation, or other spiritual practices. Mystical experiences in esotericism are seen as moments of direct communion with the divine, allowing the individual to transcend the limitations of ordinary perception and access more profound truths about the nature of reality.

In the next post, we’ll delve into how different spiritual traditions worldwide interpret culture, from Hinduism and Buddhism to Western esoteric traditions like Gnosticism and Theosophy.

Esotericism as a Path to Hidden Truths

Esotericism invites both readers and characters to explore the hidden layers of existence, seeking deeper meaning in the universe and within themselves. Whether through the study of ancient symbols, the pursuit of personal transformation, or the unveiling of cosmic connections, esotericism offers a profound and mystical journey into the unknown.

For writers, it provides a rich framework for crafting stories that explore themystical, the hidden, and the transformative. Whether you’re designing secret societies, crafting magical systems, or delving into character development through spiritual awakening, esoteric concepts can give your narratives depth, intrigue, and a sense of the transcendent.

Esotericism teaches that reality is more than what we see, and by peeling back the layers, both characters and readers can discover truths that are often hidden in plain sight.

[devilmen-collector]

Solomon/MC - the Pope of Hell

C/W: religious theme, spoilers of the main story up to chapter 5 of the main story.

Note: calling Solomon "Pope of Hell" doesn't mean his dynamic and relationship with the devils are exactly the same with the relationship between the Pope and other Catholics. The same applies in the case of MC, who is Solomon's successor.

To begin, after reading the main story, I started to notice some interesting similarities between the Pope and Solomon, enough to make me write this post from the sentiment of my religious heart.

I. The Keys

Christ Giving the Keys to Saint Peter, fresco, Pietro Perugino, 1481-82.

Thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. And I will give to thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven. And whatsoever thou shalt bind upon earth, it shall be bound also in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose upon earth, it shall be loosed also in heaven. Matthew 16:18-19 DRB

So we have Christ giving Peter the keys to the kingdom of Heaven. From this very Scripture verses comes the well-known symbol of the Papacy, two crossed keys, one gold and another silver, under the triple tiara. The silver key symbolizes the power "to bind and loose" on earth, while the golden key symbolizes the power "to bind and loose" on Heaven.

Now returning to the lore we are given in the game. It's mentioned that Solomon had 2 "Keys". One Lesser Key he left in Hell, and one Greater Key crafted by God.

Chapter 4, Stage 29 - the Holy Grail of God that Betrayed God

So I began to make a connection between the two images. The Lesser Key with St. Peter's silver key, which symbolizes papal power and authority on earth, which is lesser than Heaven; and the Greater Key with the golden key, which symbolizes papal power and authority on Heaven, which is the greater of the two.

Yes, the devils did mention a "third Key". However, they were only making a hypothesis on Solomon's disappearance. And given the likely reality that Solomon is physical deceased after his disappearance, the third Key probably doesn't exist and there are only two Keys. The fact that there are two key currencies in-game solidifies this theory, at least for now.

Story 4-29

II. The Power to Crown the Emperor

In the game, we know that at the end, MC has to choose one devil among the Seven Deadly Sins and 72 nobles and makes him the "Emperor of Hell", "the king of kings", "the Final Temptation" who will rule all of Hell.

"With your own hands" make me thing MC has to literally put a crown on the head of the devil whom they chose. But that's just my personal theory.

Chapter 1, Story 45 - the Contract is Broken

Now return to history, in the Medieval Age, kings were crowned by a bishop/archbishop of a prominent see in his country on their Coronation Day. However, there's one monarch who has to be crowned by the Pope. That's the Holy Roman Emperor.

Before being crowned by the Pope, the Emperor could not style himself as "Emperor", but only a "king", the exact title being "King of the Romans". Only after the Pope put the imperial crown on their head did the Emperor call himself "Holy Roman Emperor". This remained the case until 1508 when Pope Julius II permitted Maximilian I to use the title "Emperor Elect" with coronation by the hands of the Pope. Before that, like his predecessors before coronation, Maximilian I was only styled "King of the Romans". Even Napoleon knew that and had to get the Pope to officiate his coronation as the Emperor of the French, even though he raised the crown on his head himself.

The difference lies in the fact that unlike the Emperor of Hell, who will rule all the 7 nations of Hell, the Holy Roman Emperor in real life didn't have the power to rule other independent kingdoms in Europe, like France or England. However, being the Emperor, he was the most prominent Catholic monarch across Europe. Still, I believe I have proved the similarity here: Pope crowned an Emperor, MC will also crown one.

III. Tongue

The third similarity I see lies in the traditional way of how Catholics received Holy Communion (or the Eucharist), which is receiving on the tongue. And to do that in a correct way, Catholics need to kneel down and stick the tongue out a little bit.

Maybe it's just me but when I saw the CGs where MC break the contracts with the devils. I immediately thought of this image because I saw some similarities.

To have their contracts broken, the devils also kneel down and stick their tongues out. And if they stick their tongues out to break the contracts, could it be possible that when they first made contracts with Solomon, they also knelt down and stuck their tongues out to receive the pattern, just similar to how Catholics receive the Eucharist in the traditional way?

IV. Relationships with two powerful sides

In the fourth century, the Roman Empire converted to Christianity and gradually abandoning paganism. The Byzantine Empire was the successor of this great empire. The Byzantine Empire was Christian throughout its history. However, on more than one occasions, this empire showed disrespect and even violence to the Pope, the Head of the Christian Church, whom they were supposed to protect and honor. One Pope, St. Silverius was even murdered by the Byzantine conspiracy. Slowly, the Pope knew he couldn't trust or rely on the Byzantine anymore, so he sought help from the Frankish, whose king was Charlemagne, and Charlemagne's successor was the Holy Roman Emperor.

In a similar way, we have the powerful angels hating Solomon for gaining God's favor. They even tried to kill all of his descendants, including MC. As God's messengers and servants, they should have been the ones to protect Solomon and his descendants, but they did the contrary. Now to survive, MC has to rely on the other powerful faction, the devils.

So,

Solomon and MC mirror St. Peter/the Pope/Papacy

Angels mirrors the unfaithful Byzantine Empire

Devils mirror the Frankish/Holy Roman Empire and other Western European kingdoms, by allusion

Another point is that just like the historical relationship between the Pope with the Holy Roman Empire and other Western kingdoms, the relationship between MC and the devils is not always smooth and well. Mammon once thought he was MC's owner at first, just like how kings and Emperors of the West thought they could keep the Papacy under their control, or Leviathan and his Hades nobles kidnapping and trying to kill MC, just like how the Pope was a prisoner and had his life endangered by a particular Western kingdom for a long time and on more than one occasions.

Well, that's all to my ramble (possibly being delulu like Sitri) but thank you for reading it all to the end :3

[arisaria]

𝒟𝒜ℛ𝒦 𝒮ℐ𝒟ℰ 𝒪ℱ 𝒟ℰ𝒱𝒜 𝒩𝒜𝒦𝒮ℋ𝒜𝒯ℛ𝒜𝒮? 𝒫𝓉.2

Heyyy, if u saw the first post I made about Kaikeyi and deva nakshatras—this is the part I did about Judas yet chose to not include as I believed it not as strong of an argument for what I was trying to convey. Anyway, here it is:

Mind you, Judas, who was a disciple of Christ, eventually betrayed him, and that led to the event of the Crucifixion and so on. This event, for known reasons, was also a very spiritual event that, in a way, needed to happen.

“In all, these two figures, who have by the way been “demonized” in many instances in today’s world, were also catalyzed and played key roles in major spiritual tasks executed in this world according to scriptures.”

Now stay with me as I move into Judas’s case:

2 - 𝒥𝓊𝒹𝒶𝓈

So Judas, the ‘betrayer,’ although I was not able to find helpful historically-specific things that would help determine a birth time or nakshatras, I was reminded of this:

(Maybe tap on the images to view in more depth)—

Essentially, I was reminded of a theory that the disciples had correlations to the astrological signs. I for one found this both interesting and very much possibly containing some truth to it, as references to the Zodiac are “esoterically” all throughout the Bible.

Anyway, considering the above, Judas (prior to being replaced by another disciple) was associated with without debate (considering some of the disciples were assigned signs interchangeably in the above images) the sign of Pisces.

So I figured looking into the nakshatras that Pisces rules. These nakshatras are Purva Bhadrapada, Uttara Bhadrapada, and Revati.

Now, just as Kaikeyi, given her typical portrayal, was given another “retelling” or insight for her situation, Judas too has one of his own.

Though slightly less personal, shorter, and more ancient than Kaikeyi’s.

What I speak of is the Gospel of Judas, where Christ is conveyed speaking with Judas on a rather “higher-esteem” or “enlightened” take concerning his role in the things he was to do, giving another perspective to Judas’s being. Sort of similar to Patel and Kaikeyii (ALTHOUGH the Gospel of Judas is a scripture of sorts and the book Kaikeyii is fictional—again—don’t come for meee).

So, back to nakshatras, I have to admit, I could not easily see how Judas might have fit under a Deva nakshatra of Pisces. Rather, I think he would have embodied Purva Bhadrapada as a sun sign and Ashlesha as a moon sign. Which both are admittedly rakshasa in nature. Some of Ashlesha’s symbols are a serpent and male cat (I also saw somewhere that Ashlesha can mean “the embracer” or “a tight embrace,” which also reminded me of how Judas embraced Christ and kissed him before “betraying” him 👀).

Not to mention, the animal of Purva Bhadrapada is a male lion, and Judas’ name in its initial form would have been “Judas” or something of the sort. This goes back to the biblical tribe of Judah, which carries heavy lion connotations (Christ being the “Lion of Judah” or “Lion of God,” “God’s praise”), all of which essentially tie thematically to lions and even the Leo zodiac sign. This lion symbolism seems to resonate well with Judas’ role and the larger themes surrounding him.

Plus, Purva Bhadrapada has Jupiter as its ruler (which relates to Christ, being a teacher or guru) and has symbols of the sword, the two front legs of a funeral cot, and a man with two faces. These themes too seemed to stick out to me in relation to Judas’s life, role, and how he related to Christ—

So in a nutshell, although I couldn’t necessarily find supporting evidence of Judas inherently being of deva nakshatras (I mean, cuz he like ancient-), for what I did “figure out,” I found it interesting that he was so closely associated with divine presences such as Christ (who I personally believe represents or coincides with Revati of Pisces). Judas is the rakshasa representation of Pisces whereas Christ, who was his supposed master, is the deva or divine representation of Pisces.

Either way, Judas was demonized—even though taking things from the point of view of divine guidance, perspective, and control, his role technically should not have been condemned. Especially taking into account Isaiah 45:7, “I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things.”

Anyway, his case seems to be less of a strong argument for what I’m trying to prove, nevertheless, my “point,” if you will, from my initial post still remains.

thanks for reading luvss 🙈🧚🏼‍♀️💕

[daemon-in-my-head]

Ok. I've had the thought for a while that in a very twisted way, Gortash and Durge are like Eve and the Serpent and @laubritter positively made it worse (thank you for the blessing that was the Xvim paralles)

So, Durge was incredibly devoted and faithful to Bhaal, Durge's god and creator(!). Until a certain Tyrant came along, befriended the poor innocent creature, and led it astray, away from Bhaals teaching, to question the formerly blind faith. Potentially teaching the reclusive Durge knowledge about a world they were hidden from. Key point being knowledge.

Durge is a bit like Eve in that regard, blissfully ignorant until she passes by the tree and the Serpent. But she didn't fall for the Serpents' tricks immediately. It took some coercion, some time, multiple visits. Just like it took Gortash years to drive Durge to a point where the Bhaalspawn actively began defying Bhaal. To the point where Durge wrote the prayer.

The Serpent didn't immediately succeed in convincing Eve to trust it. But once the Serpent was successful, she took a bite out of the forbidden fruit. She gained knowledge and then defied her creator and God. And as punishment for her transgression, she fell, was cast out of paradise. And the moment Durge took a bite of the forbidden fruit, had gained enough knowledge or maybe even understood the festering feelings, the moment the prayer was written, Durge fell from grace. Fell from the place of chosen and was cast out of the temple.

Now, on top of that, Xvim, who has a lot of parallels with Gortash, has an adder as one of his symbols. A serpent. Gortash has dragons on his coat. They do be similar enough to reptiles without pissing off Bane for reminding him of his son.

Also, correct me if I'm wrong, but what happened to Adam and Eves' children again? Cain and Abel? Didn't they fight each other until only one was left, similar to how the Bhaalspawn in general but also Durge and Orin fought each other until only one was left? The fate that all of Durges children will have to face even in the redemption ending?

Also something something about Gortashes obsession with devils, being raised by a Cambion in the hells and then acting as the Serpent, aka the devil. Corrupting an innocent soul the way devils do. On top of that, he is a manipulator and mastermind. Or at least he's portrayed that way. He always has ulterior motives, and one might say he has a snake like personality.

ALSO ALSO Infernal being based on Latin. The language the bible was written in for the longest time. A language in general is very closely tied to holy scriptures. Gorty probably knows infernal too, considering his upbringing.

Am I making sense? Idk. But apparently, this flavour of durgetash took over, and I will now return to sketching something depicting the two most evil and tragic gremlins alongside a Serpent because I saw smth and now that idea is stuck. It's just now worse than before.

[madfaithconnections]

2 Thessalonians 3:16: A Tarot Reading For Finding The Path To Peace

(2 Thessalonians 3:16) — May the Lord of peace Himself give you His peace at all times and in every situation. The Lord be with you all.

This scripture reminds us that at all times, we have access to God’s peace. So, how can we connect with that peace, especially in stressful situations? I’ve decided to pull some tarot cards to see what messages come through about ways we can better connect with God’s peace when life feels overwhelming.

Whenever people think of tarot, the Bible might not often come to mind. Sometimes, tarot and religion carry stigmas. I respect those who may feel conflicted about combining them. For me, I dismiss my ego and focus on my personal relationship with God.

Much like tarot, religion itself can have both light and dark sides depending on intentions. Faith is what you make it. If your intentions are rooted in love and growth, then your practices will reflect that. For me, tarot strengthens my spirituality and connection with God.

The first card that came out while shuffling was the 10 of Pentacles.

10 of Pentacles Overview

The 10 of Pentacles represents abundance, legacy, stability, and lasting success. It embodies the culmination of long-term efforts and the rewards of a well-established foundation, often symbolizing family, heritage, and generational wealth. This card reflects harmony within a community or family unit and a sense of security that extends beyond material wealth to emotional and spiritual fulfillment.

Key themes:

Legacy: The impact of your actions on future generations.

Stability: A period of security and peace.

Connection: A sense of belonging in a family, community, or spiritual lineage.

Fulfillment: Reaching a milestone that provides contentment and joy.

10 of Pentacles in Seeking God’s Peace

When seeking ways to connect with God’s peace, the 10 of Pentacles suggests grounding yourself in stability and reflecting on the interconnectedness of your spiritual heritage and life’s blessings. This card encourages finding peace through:

Gratitude for Blessings:  Acknowledge the abundance in your life — whether material, emotional, or spiritual. Recognizing these gifts can center you in God’s peace. Often, shifting your focus from what you lack to what you already have can bring a sense of calm almost instantly.  Reflect: What gifts in your life remind you of God’s presence and provision?

Family and Community:  God’s peace can often be found through harmonious relationships and a sense of belonging. The 10 of Pentacles invites you to lean on the people in your life during hard or stressful times. By centering yourself in love, you may naturally find a sense of calm.  Reflect: How can your relationships reflect God’s love and peace?

Legacy of Faith:  This card symbolizes the wisdom and traditions passed down through generations. Exploring spiritual teachings or reflecting on your ancestors’ faith journeys can help you tap into God’s enduring peace. Tradition is valuable, but creating your own path is just as valid. Exploring the many ways God shows up in the world is an exciting and peaceful adventure.  Reflect: What spiritual practices or traditions bring you closer to God?

Finding Stability:  The card suggests that peace is rooted in a strong foundation. Whether through prayer, meditation, or daily rituals, nurturing your spiritual base helps you anchor yourself in God’s tranquility.  Reflect: How can you create a stable routine that invites God’s peace into your life?

The next card that came through was the 6 of Cups.

6 of Cups in Seeking God’s Peace

The 6 of Cups invites you to reflect on the joy and innocence of your past while allowing healing from any lingering pain. This card encourages peace through reconnection and gratitude.

Reconnecting with Simplicity:  Embrace childlike faith and wonder, trusting in God’s love and care. Simplifying your faith can bring a deep sense of peace.  Reflect: How can you reconnect with the simple joys of your faith or life?

Healing Through Forgiveness:  The 6 of Cups often suggests releasing bitterness and finding peace by forgiving yourself or others.  Reflect: Is there a past hurt or regret you can release to make space for God’s peace?

Cherishing the Past:  Reflect on happy memories and the blessings God has provided throughout your journey. Gratitude for the past can ground you in the present.  Reflect: What memories remind you of God’s love and peace in your life?

Acts of Generosity:  Sharing your blessings in small, meaningful ways reflects the spirit of God’s peace.  Reflect: How can sharing your blessings deepen your connection with God’s peace?

The third card that came through was the 3 of Wands.

3 of Wands in Seeking God’s Peace

The 3 of Wands is about expansion, vision, and anticipation of growth. It suggests looking ahead with optimism and preparing for the next phase of your journey.

Faith in the Unknown:  Trusting in God’s timing and provision as you step into new opportunities brings peace amidst uncertainty. Like the Fool card, this reminds us that living in the moment can bring peace, free from the fear of what’s to come.  Reflect: How can you place your plans and dreams in God’s hands?

Expanding Spiritual Horizons:  Exploring new ways to connect with God — through prayer, study, or creative practices — can deepen your peace.  Reflect: How can you expand your spiritual practices to grow closer to God?

Preparation Through Faith:  Peace comes from preparation and trust. By aligning your actions with your values, you create a solid foundation for God’s blessings.  Reflect: How can you prepare your heart and mind to receive God’s peace?

Hopeful Anticipation:  Instead of worrying about what lies ahead, trust that God has a plan and your journey is unfolding as it should.  Reflect: How can you release control and rest in God’s guidance?

Affirmations to Connect with God’s Peace

“I find peace in the blessings and stability God has provided, trusting that His love surrounds me in all I build and share.”

“I release the past with gratitude, finding peace in God’s grace and the joy of the present.”

“I trust God’s guidance as I step forward with faith, knowing peace is found in His plan for my journey.”

I hope this has inspired you to explore ways to connect with God’s peace in your life.

Until next time,

Madison

[mightyostanes]

The Covenant of Shem

(TW: Using the Talmud and Midrash to commit Heresy)

First off, I don't take any narrative in Genesis as literal truth at all even if I find it spiritually meaningful. I am of course, of the opinion that anything even remotely resembling hard historical fact starts around Exodus and Numbers. And even then, I'm not sure how much of it is distorted by the multi century long gap between when the events purportedly happened and when they were written down. I am also of the opinion that Judaism fundamentally grew out of the milieu of Syro-Mesopotamian and Hurro-Hittite religions that surrounded the ancient Israelites. It is of course, absolutely an evolution and a step forward in the same way that Homo Sapiens are more evolved than Homo Erectus, but to deny its roots is completely illogical in my opinion.

Because of this, I find comparing the Tanakh to other stories in the ancient semitic world incredibly valuable both spiritually and academically. Especially by seeing what Judaism chose to change and alter versus what they kept. Studying these ancient faiths can also help add context to various passages by putting them into the context of the religious and cultural norms of the time they were written down. Of course, this may sound denigrating to look for answers in scriptural interpretation in the Ugaritic Ba'al cycle and the Neo Babylonian Enuma Elish but it's also important to outreach with other small MENA ethnoreligions around today. Many of whom share ideas both with us and the Ancient Semitic, Hurro-Hittite, and Iranic religions that would also evolve and coalesce into Judaism. The key to this linkage both with the Ziggurates of Ur, and the Yazidis, Druze, and Mandaeans of the modern age is the biblical figure of Shem.

For those of you that don't know Shem is the third son of Noach and the ancestor of most peoples who speak semitic languages (Bereshis 9:18). Like his brother Japeth, Shem covered his drunken naked father and received a blessing instead of receiving a curse like Ham (Bereshis (9:20-27). For the record Ham isn't strictly the father of Africans, instead he was mainly the father of groups the Israelities didn't like, such as Egypt (Mitzrayim), Nimrod, the Canaanites (Canaan) and even the probably Indo-European Philistines (Through his Grandson Caphtor). It's entirely possible that Ethiopians and Nubians simply got caught in the crossfire because they were very closed to and partially related to the Egyptians. Especially as the Pharaohs of the period most of our earliest Hebrew texts come from (The 8th to 7th centuries BCE) were members of the purely Nubian 25th Dynasty that was in close contact with the monarchy in Jerusalem (2 Kings 19:9). Therefore, contrary to what racist asshats may think the curse of Ham wasn't black skin (The Philistines were described as fair, and most Canaanites resembled Israelites and modern Lebanese Maronite Christians), it was getting their asses handed to them by the Israelites in the biblical past.

Moving back from that tangent on taking biblical quotes out of context to fuel racism, let's return to the topic of Shem. Because Shem was the direct ancestor of Abraham it makes a lot of sense for Jews wanting to give Abraham an impressive pedigree for a Hellenistic gentile audience to start writing about Shem and how Abraham either inherited his library or studied with him in person (1). According to these texts such Pagan luminaries as Galen, Hippocrates and even the Greek demigod Asclepius used various medical treatise supposedly written by Shem. The fact that Nehushtan resembled the Greek symbol of Asclepius, a deity who had temples in and around Eretz Israel most likely did not go unnoticed by Jewish intellectuals (2). Shem's academy also gave pre-Mosaic patriarchs and Matriarchs somewhere and something to study (Bereshit Rabbah: 63: 10) thus making them more rabbinic figures who also poured over texts for secret meanings and consulted their seniors on matters of Jewish law.

In addition to his study hall, Shem was associated with the character of Melchizedek found in Genesis 18 (Nedarim 32b:6). The enigmatic priest of El Elyon who blesses Abraham after his war against the Babylonian and Elamite forces. In that same Talmudic section, it not only states that he was born circumcised thus putting him in quite an exclusive club, but also that he was the one who transmitted priesthood to Israel. Similarly his study hall/court also hosted the divine presence (Makkot 23b:12, Yoma 10a:1). Something those passages say had only happened three times in human history. In the non-rabbinic but contemporaneous, Qumran literature Melchizedek is also seen as the earthly incarnation of the Archangel Michael, while some Heikalot literature identified him as another angelic being (1). While this may seem odd to reference, it's quite clear that Jews deemed 'rabbinical' by Karaites had access to texts like these or texts with similar themes. Later on in the Zohar Melchizedek is hinted at as a potential past incarnation of the Messiah (Zohar Lech Lecha 240:24), and as a potential Partzuf of the Sefira of Malkuth (Idra Zutra 79). It's relatively obvious that the writers of these passages would've been familiar with the tradition that Shem and Melchizedek were the same person.

Ironically this high esteem for Shem may not simply come from his ancestral status but also his name. In second temple and heterodox Rabbinic Judaism there was this idea of G-d's name as a hypostatic entity that could reside inside or rest on human beings allowing them to act as superhuman, possibly even super angelic intermediaries (3). With the idea that this name somehow contained all divine knowledge and even had an accompanying angel in the form of either Yahoel or Metatron, beings that though not identical with the name did act as the ultimate wielders and guardians of the name if not direct emanations of the name which emanates from G-d (3). This theology was known as Shem theology as opposed to the image focused Kavod theology, so it becomes pretty obvious who the Rabbis and other interpreters would assume the Shem of G-d definitely rested on (3).

In fact, it's quite possible that some commentators may even have thought that Shem was an actual incarnation of Yahoel or Metatron. Before everyone gets their undergarments in a twist, the main issue between Jewish and Christian theology is the idea that G-d cannot incarnate as a human. This does not mean that angels including incredibly important ones can't incarnate, possess people, or even shape embryos in their likeness (4). In the Merkavah Rabbah, Rabbi Ishmael Hakohen is said to be either the son, the image, or the earthly double of the archangel Gabriel whom he receives his power from (4). Indeed, angelic doubles or personal angels are mentioned in a literal translation of Tractate Kallah 3:4 when Rabbi Akiba argues with some other sages is, "How dare the angel of your heart transgress the words of your colleagues.". Therefore, rather than Shem being seen as exceptional for having an angelic aspect it'd be more likely that Shem's importance came from having a much more important angel in that role than most people. As well as offering an easy way to tie rabbinic doctrine into popular ideas of Melchizedek being intimately connected with high-ranking angels. More importantly unlike most people, Shem would probably be intimately aware of said personal angel.

Because of his relatively high-ranking status and role as a source of esoteric wisdom it'd make sense that he'd at least teach his sons certain things regarding theology and cosmology. Even if over time, said knowledge became garbled and corrupted over time. The sons of Shem are Arphaxad (Jews, Chaldeans, Sumerians, and Akkadians), Lud (Kurds and Anatolians), Elam (Medes and other southern Iranians), Ashur (Assyrians), and Aram (Amorites and other related groups). Therefore, the religions of those groups descended at least partially from the teachings of Shem who in some circles was a figure superior to Noah, and Avraham, and potentially equal to Enoch, Jacob, and Moses in some respects.

Indeed, there is precedence for giving less favored sons secret knowledge as a consolation prize in Jewish texts. Avraham gives his other sons occult secrets as a gift in Sanhedrin 91a. Mysteries that Medieval Kabbalists would consider somewhat unsavory but important to being a fully realized mystic capable of enacting Tikkun on the divine.

As a pre-Diluvian and thus pre-Jewish patriarch, Shem also acts as a backdoor for non-Jewish ideas by putting them within the Jewish tradition. Because it was claimed that Galen and Hippocrates got their knowledge from Shem (1), it was therefore allowed to bring some of their ideas into Jewish thought on the basis that Jews were simply retrieving them. A similar process was applied to Hermetic literature by implying that Hermes Trismegistus was either Moses or Enoch (5). Indeed, in Avodah Zarah 43a:5, using amulets with pagan gods such as Apis or Isis was allowed under the assumption that they represented biblical figures such as Joseph or Eve. Figures that if their amulets worked even if made by Akumim meant that these figures had some powers in and of themselves.

Lastly, unlike in Islam Judaism has an idea of an evolving covenant that continually gets added onto by various divine revelations. The Covenant of the sons of Noah was the precursor to the Covenant of Abraham, which was the precursor to the Covenant at Sinai, which included and preceded the covenant of David. None of these covenants is rendered invalid but it's clear that they aren't all revealed at the same time. So at least for certain groups of people those covenants are still valid even if they aren't members of the Mosaic covenant. Of course, the ancient Mesopotamians and Amorites didn't follow the 7 Noachide laws. But there are groups that explicitly claim Shem as a prophet (Or syncretize another figure to Shem) today that follow these laws assuming one takes Shituf into account.

These groups are the Yazidis, the Druze, the Mandaeans, the Yarnasans, the Alawis, and to a lesser extent, Zoroastrians and Nestorian Christians. All of which are like us, in that they're small persecuted Near Eastern Ethno-Religions. Groups that have found common ground with the Jews while living in diaspora (6). So much so that one Mandaean was shocked with how similar Mandaeans were to the Hasidic Jews he worked with (7). More importantly many of these groups share similar esoteric doctrines to Judaism, including the role of the alphabet in creation, reincarnation, angels incarnating into humans throughout history, angelic doubles, Enoch is Metatron, ostensible monotheism focused on the G-d worshipped by the antediluvian patriarchs, a reluctance to accept converts, the importance of the antediluvian patriarchs, a world soul, as well as an aversion to Pork. Therefore, I'd like to propose a fourth major covenant given to these groups that keep the Noachide laws, the covenant of Shem. Who entrusted the secrets of the universe to his children so that they may heal the world.

More importantly these are esoteric doctrines that Nicene Christians and non-Sufi Muslim don't accept due to their wars on heresy. These are the same esoteric doctrines that Groypers and Anti-Semitic Fundamentalists cite as reasons why Rabbinic Judaism is 'Satanic' or 'evil'. These groups are also metaphorical children of Shem but ones that denied their heritage. Creeds that have disowned Shem and turned to persecute their brothers under the unconscious urgings of Ur, of Habtar, of Samael. By denying or mystical traditions, by shoving Kabbalah under the rug, by considering Heikalot and Shi'ur Qomah as shameful works contaminated by foreign superstition, we potentially risk the same outcome. To become the same Sadducees that our Rabbis fought against for the sake of majority approval in the vain hope that said majority won't persecute us. This isn't to say that mainstream Christianity and Islam won't rejoin the covenant of Shem. Maybe someday they will, but until then it's important to focus on those who still hold this covenant, and as the most numerous and powerful community in this group we should make it our duty to protect them. If we do follow this route, and keep our responsibility to our partners, than who knows, maybe the court of Shem will be rebuilt and once more the Divine Presence shall dwell within it.

Non-Primary Source Bibliography

1.Reeves, John C. Heralds of that good realm syro-mesopotamian gnosis and Jewish traditions. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1996.

2. McCasland, S. Vernon. “The Asklepios Cult in Palestine.” Journal of Biblical Literature 58, no. 3 (1939): 221–27. https://doi.org/10.2307/3259486.

3.Orlov, Andrei A. “Praxis of the Voice: The Divine Name Traditions in the ‘Apocalypse of Abraham.’” Journal of Biblical Literature 127, no. 1 (2008): 53–70. https://doi.org/10.2307/25610106.

4. Idel, Moshe. Ben: Sonship and Jewish mysticism. Continuum, 2008.

Pgs 138-139

5.Lelli, Fabrizio. "Hermes among the Jews: Hermetica as Hebraica from antiquity to the Renaissance." Magic, Ritual, and Witchcraft 2, no. 2 (2007): 111+. Gale Literature Resource Center (accessed February 17, 2025). https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A171889288/LitRC?u=anon~68c01c5c&sid=googleScholar&xid=ac6d5f42.

6.

Russell, Gerard. Heirs to forgotten kingdoms: Journeys into the disappearing religions of the Middle East. New York: Basic Books, a member of the Perseus Books Group, 2015.

Pg 270

7. Buckley, Jorunn Jacobsen. The Mandaeans: Ancient texts and modern people. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.

Pg 27.

[omegaphilosophia]

The Philosophy of Hermeneutics

The philosophy of hermeneutics is the study of interpretation, particularly of texts, language, and symbolic expressions. Hermeneutics originally developed as a method for interpreting religious scriptures, but it has expanded to encompass broader issues of understanding and meaning in various contexts, including literature, law, art, and social sciences. Central to hermeneutics is the idea that understanding is not a straightforward process but involves complex interpretive acts influenced by history, culture, and the interpreter’s perspective.

Key Themes in the Philosophy of Hermeneutics:

Origins and Development:

Biblical Hermeneutics: Hermeneutics began as the art of interpreting sacred texts, particularly the Bible. Early thinkers like Augustine and Origen developed principles for understanding scriptures, focusing on the need to uncover deeper, often allegorical, meanings.

Philosophical Hermeneutics: Over time, hermeneutics expanded beyond religious texts to include general principles of interpretation. Friedrich Schleiermacher, often considered the father of modern hermeneutics, argued that understanding any text requires insight into both the author’s intent and the broader cultural context.

Hermeneutic Circle:

Part-Whole Relationship: A central concept in hermeneutics is the "hermeneutic circle," which describes the process of understanding as a circular relationship between the whole and its parts. To understand a text (the whole), one must interpret its individual elements (the parts), but understanding each part requires an awareness of the whole.

Prejudices and Preconceptions: The hermeneutic circle also highlights that interpretation is influenced by the interpreter’s preconceptions. Understanding is thus seen as a dynamic process where initial assumptions are continually revised in light of new insights.

Key Figures in Hermeneutics:

Friedrich Schleiermacher: Schleiermacher emphasized the importance of understanding the author’s psychological context and argued for a universal approach to interpretation that could apply to any text, not just religious ones.

Wilhelm Dilthey: Dilthey extended hermeneutics into the human sciences (Geisteswissenschaften), arguing that human experience and history could only be understood through interpretive methods, contrasting with the natural sciences’ emphasis on explanation.

Hans-Georg Gadamer: Gadamer, a leading 20th-century philosopher, developed a concept known as "philosophical hermeneutics." He emphasized the role of history and tradition in shaping understanding and argued that interpretation is a dialogical process, where the interpreter engages in a conversation with the text.

Paul Ricoeur: Ricoeur introduced the idea of a "hermeneutics of suspicion," where interpretation involves uncovering hidden meanings, often related to power, ideology, or unconscious motives. He also explored the interplay between explanation and understanding in interpreting texts.

Interpretation and Meaning:

Text and Context: Hermeneutics stresses the importance of context in interpreting meaning. A text cannot be understood in isolation; it must be seen within its historical, cultural, and linguistic context. This idea is crucial in both literary criticism and legal interpretation.

Meaning as Process: Hermeneutic philosophy views meaning not as a fixed entity but as something that emerges through the interpretive process. Meaning is constructed in the interaction between the interpreter and the text, shaped by both historical tradition and the interpreter’s unique perspective.

Understanding and Language:

Language as Medium: In hermeneutics, language is seen as the medium through which understanding occurs. Gadamer argued that language shapes our experience of the world and that all understanding is mediated by language. This leads to the view that interpretation is always situated within a linguistic and cultural tradition.

Fusion of Horizons: Gadamer introduced the concept of the "fusion of horizons," which describes how understanding involves merging the interpreter’s perspective (horizon) with that of the text or author. This fusion allows for a new, shared meaning to emerge, transcending the limitations of both the text’s original context and the interpreter’s preconceptions.

Hermeneutics and Phenomenology:

Influence of Heidegger: Martin Heidegger, a major influence on hermeneutic philosophy, argued that understanding is a fundamental aspect of human existence (Dasein). He shifted the focus from the interpretation of texts to the interpretation of being itself, emphasizing that our understanding of the world is always interpretive and situated within a particular historical and cultural context.

Existential Hermeneutics: Heidegger’s ideas led to the development of existential hermeneutics, which explores how individuals interpret their own existence and the world around them. This approach emphasizes the subjective and situated nature of understanding.

Applications of Hermeneutics:

Literary Criticism: Hermeneutics is a foundational approach in literary theory, where it is used to analyze texts, uncover deeper meanings, and explore the interplay between author, text, and reader.

Legal Interpretation: In law, hermeneutics is applied to interpret legal texts, such as constitutions, statutes, and contracts. It involves understanding the intent of the law, the context in which it was written, and how it applies to contemporary situations.

Historical Understanding: Historians use hermeneutic methods to interpret historical texts and events, recognizing that understanding the past involves reconstructing the perspectives and contexts of historical actors.

Critiques and Challenges:

Objectivity vs. Subjectivity: One critique of hermeneutics is that it can lead to relativism, where all interpretations are seen as equally valid. Critics argue that this undermines the possibility of objective knowledge. However, hermeneutic philosophers like Gadamer counter that interpretation is not purely subjective but is guided by tradition and shared norms.

The Role of Power: Hermeneutics has been challenged by critical theory, particularly by thinkers like Jürgen Habermas, who argue that hermeneutics often overlooks the role of power and ideology in shaping meaning. This critique has led to more critical approaches that incorporate an awareness of social and political factors in interpretation.

The philosophy of hermeneutics is a rich and complex field that explores how we understand texts, language, and human experience. It reveals that interpretation is not a straightforward process but is shaped by history, culture, language, and the interpreter’s perspective. Hermeneutics challenges us to recognize the situated nature of understanding and the dialogical process through which meaning emerges. Whether in literature, law, history, or everyday communication, hermeneutics offers profound insights into the nature of meaning and the act of interpretation.

[sapphosremains]

You've mentioned considering leaving Anglicanism. If you were to do so, would you rather be Orthodox or Roman Catholic, and what's the reasoning?

In short, I remain torn as always. This morning I read a post from a sister I follow who converted from Roman Catholicism to Anglicanism, where she talked about appreciating Anglicanism for its freedom to appreciate and incorporate aspects of other denominations, as we don't claim to be One True Church. This is probably the thing keeping me in Anglicanism right now - there are aspects of Orthodoxy that speak to me, and aspects of RC that speak to me, and I have the freedom to learn from both. However, the failing of this is the presumption that I should be allowed to pick and choose. This is the root of it - why I think I will probably convert in the end - I don't think it should be up to me.

The appeal of both Orthodoxy and RC is the nagging feeling that this Protestant idea of scripture being the highest authority, and that we ought to be free to interpret it as we please, cannot be right. As someone once put it - Jesus did not leave us a KJV and tell us to get on with it! Christ left us His disciples, His Church, and the keys to St Peter. I cannot be Protestant as I cannot reject sacred tradition. Furthermore, I accept that there is a reason why the Pope is the Pope and I am not. Firstly, he is a man! But he is highly educated, called by God, and the vicar of His Church. Why would I not respect his authority? I believe sacred scripture and sacred tradition must come hand in hand - each support the other. While I believe the Bible is inerrant and infallible, I know that I am not. Therefore I am bound to interpret it wrong (do not rely on your own insight etc etc). However, I have sacred tradition to guide me - knowledge passed down quite literally from God himself. Why would I ever abandon that?

Other more specific appeals are in things such as my belief in transubstantiation (not symbols!!!), the communion of God's people (intercession of saints), respect for and veneration of Mary, etc.

Now, the issue of Orthodox or RC. I think most likely RC. Above all else, I feel more called to RC. I think this is the most important part - all the reasoning I might go on to explain might just as easily be called picking and choosing a denomination by what appeals as far as my Anglicanism! The big one, of course, is filioque. I just agree with the RC perspective. The biblical evidence for the Spirit proceeding from the Son makes sense to me, and it seems cohesive. However, of course a lot of modern theologians suggest that it ought not be a cause of schism, as it is a matter of interpretation as opposed to doctrine, and there is little true difference in meaning, more a misunderstanding of each other's interpretations. How true this is, I am not theologically informed enough to say, but, as with many others, I do hope for reunification of the Church. Although the Orthodox presentation of the one form of divine revelation makes sense to me, I prefer the RC explanation of the two forms.

However, the pervasive issue I have which is preventing my conversion so far is the issues I take with some doctrines. And this feels a little more important as a convert. I have plenty of cradle RC friends, say, who support the idea of female priests, and believe homosexuality isn’t a sin etc, but I can’t help but feel I can’t take these same views as a convert, because I’ve chosen this denomination, if that makes sense? So I should accept it in its totality - no Protestant style quibbling of bits I don’t like. The same goes for the opposite - I’ve talked before about how fond I am of the Orthodox view of original sin, but continuing to hold a similar perception if I did convert to RC seems inappropriate. The same issues don’t apply while I stay Anglican. Firstly, we’re renowned for our flexibility - my priest only recently was discussing the freedom of Anglicans to choose any eucharistic interpretation they feel drawn to, between strict symbolism and complete transubstantiation. So, should I wish to say a Hail Mary (in fact, encouraged by my priest quite recently!) or pray my rosary, or appreciate the Orthodox view of original sin, I am quite welcome to. The second aspect of this is that I was raised Anglican - it’s my denomination, and I feel more entitled to mess with it! Anyway, that’s my main issue - any thoughts would be much appreciated!

Thank you for this question - it definitely made me consider a lot of things I hadn't before!

[karankumar001]

Vedic Astrology: Ancient Wisdom for Modern Life

Vedic astrology, also known as Jyotish Shastra, is one of the oldest and most revered systems of astrology in the world. Rooted in the sacred texts of India, it provides profound insights into human destiny, karma, and cosmic influence. Unlike Western astrology, which is based on the tropical zodiac, Vedic astrology follows the sidereal zodiac, which accounts for the fixed positions of constellations. This ancient science helps individuals understand their life's purpose, strengths, and challenges through planetary movements and alignments.

The Origins and Significance of Vedic Astrology

Vedic astrology has its roots in the Vedas, the oldest scriptures of Hindu philosophy, written thousands of years ago. The Rishis (sages) developed this system to help individuals align their lives with the cosmic order. The word "Jyotish" translates to "science of light," emphasizing how celestial bodies influence life on Earth. The practice of Vedic astrology is deeply connected to karma and dharma, suggesting that planetary positions at birth shape one's fate and spiritual journey.

Vedic astrology was traditionally used for various purposes, including determining auspicious times for rituals, marriages, and major life events. Kings and rulers relied on astrologers to guide them in making important decisions related to governance, warfare, and alliances. Today, this ancient practice continues to be a source of guidance for individuals seeking clarity in different aspects of life.

The Key Components of Vedic Astrology

Vedic astrology is based on several key elements that work together to provide a comprehensive astrological reading:

1. The Twelve Houses (Bhavas)

Each house in a Vedic birth chart represents a specific aspect of life, such as career, relationships, wealth, health, and spirituality. The positioning of planets in these houses influences how different areas of life unfold.

First House (Lagna/Bhava) – Represents the self, personality, and physical body.

Second House – Governs wealth, family, and speech.

Third House – Signifies communication, siblings, and courage.

Fourth House – Represents home, mother, and emotional security.

Fifth House – Rules creativity, education, and children.

Sixth House – Associated with health, enemies, and obstacles.

Seventh House – Governs marriage, relationships, and partnerships.

Eighth House – Represents transformation, longevity, and hidden matters.

Ninth House – Rules higher learning, spirituality, and fortune.

Tenth House – Associated with career, reputation, and status.

Eleventh House – Represents gains, networking, and ambitions.

Twelfth House – Signifies losses, spiritual growth, and subconscious mind.

2. The Twelve Zodiac Signs (Rashis)

The zodiac signs in Vedic astrology differ slightly from their Western counterparts due to the sidereal system. Each sign has unique characteristics that influence personality traits and life experiences.

Aries (Mesha) – Courageous, energetic, and assertive.

Taurus (Vrishabha) – Patient, reliable, and artistic.

Gemini (Mithuna) – Adaptable, intellectual, and curious.

Cancer (Karka) – Emotional, nurturing, and protective.

Leo (Simha) – Confident, ambitious, and charismatic.

Virgo (Kanya) – Practical, analytical, and detail-oriented.

Libra (Tula) – Diplomatic, social, and fair-minded.

Scorpio (Vrishchika) – Intense, secretive, and passionate.

Sagittarius (Dhanu) – Optimistic, adventurous, and philosophical.

Capricorn (Makara) – Disciplined, ambitious, and responsible.

Aquarius (Kumbha) – Innovative, humanitarian, and independent.

Pisces (Meena) – Imaginative, intuitive, and compassionate.

3. The Nine Planets (Navagrahas)

Vedic astrology considers nine celestial bodies that play crucial roles in shaping an individual’s life.

Sun (Surya) – Represents self-confidence, vitality, and leadership.

Moon (Chandra) – Governs emotions, mind, and intuition.

Mars (Mangala) – Symbolizes courage, aggression, and strength.

Mercury (Budha) – Represents intellect, communication, and logic.

Jupiter (Guru) – Governs wisdom, spirituality, and expansion.

Venus (Shukra) – Associated with love, beauty, and material pleasures.

Saturn (Shani) – Represents discipline, karma, and endurance.

Rahu – A shadow planet linked to desires, illusions, and ambitions.

Ketu – A shadow planet signifying detachment, spirituality, and past karma.

4. The Nakshatras (Lunar Mansions)

There are 27 Nakshatras or lunar constellations in Vedic astrology. These star clusters add deeper meaning to an individual’s personality and destiny based on their Moon sign. Each Nakshatra has a ruling deity and planetary influence that contributes to a person’s nature and life path.

5. Dasha System (Planetary Periods)

The Dasha system helps predict major life events by analyzing different planetary cycles. Each planet rules a certain period of life, bringing opportunities and challenges. The most commonly used Dasha system is the Vimshottari Dasha, which divides life into planetary periods of varying lengths.

How Vedic Astrology Works

A Vedic astrologer creates a Kundali (birth chart) based on the date, time, and place of birth. This chart reveals planetary positions at the moment of birth and helps in predicting major life trends. Some of the key readings in Vedic astrology include:

Career Predictions: Choosing the right profession based on planetary placements.

Relationship Compatibility: Matching horoscopes for marriage or partnerships.

Health and Well-being: Identifying periods of good and bad health.

Financial Growth: Analyzing financial prospects through planetary influences.

Spiritual Guidance: Understanding one's soul purpose and karmic influences.

The Relevance of Vedic Astrology in Modern Life

Despite being an ancient practice, Vedic astrology remains highly relevant in the modern world. Many individuals turn to astrology for guidance in making important life decisions. Whether it’s choosing a career, understanding relationships, or seeking spiritual growth, Vedic astrology provides deep insights.

Corporate professionals consult astrologers for business decisions, couples use it for marriage compatibility, and individuals seek remedies for planetary imbalances. With the rise of digital astrology platforms, accessing personalized horoscope readings has become easier than ever.

Conclusion

Vedic astrology is more than just fortune-telling; it is a spiritual science that helps individuals align with cosmic rhythms. By understanding planetary influences, one can make informed decisions, overcome challenges, and lead a fulfilling life. With its profound wisdom, Vedic astrology continues to illuminate the paths of millions worldwide, bridging the gap between destiny and free will.

[idylls-of-the-divine-romance]

For the sake of not filling up op's activity, I'll post my response here. I'm responding to this post here. And boyyyyyyyyyy is there a lot to unpack there. That said (in case op reads this) I would like first and foremost to thank you for being (moderately) reasonable and respectful. Even tho you did overgeneralize quite a bit (which is a logical fallacy) and make a few assumptions, you didn't shout expletives or call me a "cultist p*do" so I'll thank you for that.

Two more things before I start:

Never. Read. A. Bible. Verse. You take something out of context and you can justify any thing. The Scriptures (because I think "Bible" is a misleading term) are literature and have intense literary design. You can't read things out of context. If you read the Iliad out of context you could think it's about numerous things: how Helen's a s**t (even tho Homer never says that), how stealing women from the men who've enslaved them is wrong (yikes), how we should all burn down cities, how war is dangerous, how war is good, how glory is the best, how Achilles is the worst, how Achilles is the best, how being a real man means killing people in a fit or grief and rage. But the Iliad is actually about the destructive power of rage. Which you only know if you read it correctly. Same with the Scriptures.

It's Ancient Jewish Meditation Literature. And you need to know what those 4 words means because otherwise you will be reading the bible entirely wrong. It's Ancient (i.e. written FOR us but not TO us). It's Jewish (written in Hebrew or by Aramaic/Greek writers thinking in Hebrew; written in a distinctive Near Eastern Style). It's for Meditation (from a word meaning "too mutter". You are to meditate or mutter under your breath the Scriptures day and night for a lifetime). And it's literature (it's art. Divinely inspired art. But art nonetheless. There is an overarching narrative, symbolic key, theme and goal).

(EDIT: Somehow I forgot this last one). Everything EVERYTHING connects BACK to the first 3 chapters of Genesis and FORWARD to the Messiah.

Now. Let's begin.