Tumgik
#b: the secret history
hinamie · 26 days
Text
Tumblr media
surprise it's yuri!!!in 2024
8K notes · View notes
miroana · 11 months
Text
“It is better to know one book intimately than a hundred superficially” (Tartt, 31).
I am absolutely fascinated by the fame and reverence this quote from the Secret History has achieved. It terrifies me. Let me explain.
Who’s line is this? Oh, yes. Professor Julian Morrow. Julian, in his lecture on how death begets beauty, on how Dionysian madness lends immortality. Julian, who isolates the greek class, buries them in the glories of the past and in their privilege, and submerges them beneath illusions until his students can’t tell right from wrong and real from imagined.
These words are satire. This is NOT a lesson any teacher should impart, and should NOT be beloved and relatable. In one sentence, Donna Tartt summarizes the entire cautionary tale of the novel: the selective, warped, and obsessive view on life the greek class held, born from entitlement and cultivated by Julian, led the students to tear themselves to pieces.
What’s more, the way people quote it all the time makes this line all the more haunting. Widespread parroting of Julian’s teachings only reinforces Donna’s themes: human minds are easily manipulatable, it can be hard to think critically about what you are taught and what you read, and that the easy, self-assured conviction belonging to the reader that, “I, personally, would have behaved differently than Henry, Richard, Francis, Camilla, Charles, and Bunny” is nothing but another illusion.
327 notes · View notes
tygerland · 5 months
Text
Tumblr media
Troubled poet Ezra Pound a month after being released from St. Elizabeths psychiatric hospital in Washington D.C. where he was incarcerated for twelve years. (Photographed by Richard Avedon, 30 June 1958, at the home of William Carlos Williams in Rutherford, New Jersey.)
71 notes · View notes
secret--history · 3 months
Text
I know that 'The Secret History is a satire' is an extremly prevalent take, and I think it came about as a response to the idea that tsh "romanticises" things like classist ideas/substance abuse/murder, but like. It can be unsupportive or critical of the characters without being a satire. Satire is not the word you're looking for here
19 notes · View notes
silouvertongues · 3 months
Note
Hi! 👀👀👀
Are you following the manga? Did you see this week leaks?
finished s2 last night and i've been kinda skimming through the manga but im on ch 138 rn and simply avoiding all the spoilers until i catch up (which might take me a while bc i dont usually read manga)
3 notes · View notes
barnbridges · 9 months
Text
Tumblr media
fun fact, bunny's last words to marion are the only time he doesn't make any mistakes when writing something, and also he was just a guy writing silly little notes to his girlfriend.
9 notes · View notes
Text
poll kinda mood pt. 2
8 notes · View notes
kandayuu · 9 months
Text
going through vol 28's q&a section again and like
Tumblr media
what the fuck did he mean by that what's suspicious about lenalee's records i was under the impression that everyone knew about her order origin story like is her past just a secret to the people in universe or is there something else about her files that's odd that we the audience don't know about yet what's in them that's got lavi suspicious in the same way that he was about kanda's
which by the way makes total sense that the order would cover that up in kanda's files they were committing crimes against humanity in a very literal way but last time i checked there wasn't anything of that sort in lenalee's past unless we just don't have the full picture
which leads me to my next thought of like. if we're getting this hinted at now. does that mean we're going to be seeing more of best girl lenalee. does she have an upcoming arc. that would be nice ;;v;;
19 notes · View notes
neptunesenceladus · 7 months
Text
endlessly fascinated by works written from the perspective of the observer.
when you’re not in control who are you to the story?
Tumblr media
4 notes · View notes
glrlafraid · 1 year
Text
i often judge people for aestheticizing the secret history and not caring about the message but i have to admit that i did consider switching from B&H blues to Lucky Strikes because its what Henry WInter smokes...
8 notes · View notes
unlvcky19 · 2 years
Text
donna tartt will write the most queer coded repressed gay men you’ve ever seen and then give him a random female love interest he barely knows yet will love forever as if that helps
37 notes · View notes
alicebrekker · 2 years
Text
"There was no part of him that was not broken, that had not healed wrong, and there was no part of him that was not stronger for having been broken."
six of crows, leigh bardugo
23 notes · View notes
un-pearable · 2 years
Text
i need to be awake and Functional in two hours but in the meantime i can and will cry over my own fic. sue me i miss shard and jules and i will continue to lose my mind over them even if i haven’t published anything more about them than this
7 notes · View notes
Link
Corrected: Echoes of a shameful legacy. :: July 15, 2022
Robert B. Hubbell
Well, for the second time in two weeks, I am issuing a corrected version of the newsletter due to a factual error. I am attributing that fact to Covid. That’s my story and I am sticking to it. The audio version is included with the first newsletter (mistakes and all).
State GOP legislators and prosecutors are attempting to extend the reach of their anti-abortion legislation across state lines. These anti-choice “fugitive laws” echo a shameful chapter in US history. As I noted earlier this week, Texas legislators are threatening to charge law-firm partners across the US with felonies if their firms pay travel expenses for Texas employees seeking abortions outside of Texas. And a Republican Senator from Oklahoma just blocked a bill in the US Senate that would protect the freedom to travel across state lines to seek an abortion. See The Hill, GOP senator blocks bill to protect interstate travel for abortion.
         The efforts of states to criminalize the out-of-state conduct of their citizens and citizens of other states harkens back to one of the darkest chapters in our nation’s history. In 1850, Congress passed the Fugitive Slave Act that allowed owners of enslaved persons to pursue so-called “fugitive slaves” across state lines. To enforce that shameful mandate, the Fugitive Slave Act included the following national enforcement mechanisms
Imposed a $1,000 fine on officials anywhere in the US who failed to enforce an arrest warrant against a person escaping from slavery;
Imposed a $1,000 fine on anyone in the US who provided food or shelter to a person escaping from slavery;
Authorized a “bonus” to officers anywhere in the US who captured a person escaping from slavery;
Granted a $10 “bonus” to specially authorized “commissioners” who ruled that a captured person was a “fugitive from slavery.” (The commissioners received only $5 if they ruled that the captured person was not a “fugitive from slavery.”)
         The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 is not a perfect analog to the GOP efforts to enforce extraterritorial reach over women’s reproductive choices, but it is directionally the same. Anyone who helped a person escape from slavery was subject to a fine, like the partners in law firms threatened with a felony if they pay travel expenses to employees seeking an abortion out of state. The “bonuses” to officers and commissioners for capturing and convicting persons escaping slavery are similar to the “bounty” provisions of SB-8 in Texas that grant a $10,000 reward for informing the state that a woman had an abortion.
         The most abhorrent aspect of the extra-territorial reach of anti-abortion laws is that they treat women as property of their home state, controlling their conduct anywhere in the US—similar to the extra-territorial reach of the Fugitive Slave Act. No similar laws apply to male citizens for conduct outside their home state. The Supreme Court has created chaos by abolishing federal protection for abortion. Like the Dred Scott decision, Dobbs tears at the fabric of our union.
         In a similar vein are the efforts of states to resist the authority of the federal government to mandate life-saving abortions in emergency rooms of hospitals receiving federal reimbursement for services. See NYTimes, Texas Sues Biden Administration Over Access to Emergency Medical Abortions. The former confederate states are again attempting to assert their independence from federal supremacy—a dangerous proposition with a shameful legacy. The suit will undoubtedly end up before the US Supreme Court, but not before a stop in the arch-conservative Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.
         That said, a reader (Bruce C.) reminded everyone in the Comments section yesterday of the following:
All women need to know their rights to emergency medical care, including abortion procedures, take precedence in emergency life-threatening situations over any state laws or regulations to the contrary. When state law prohibits abortion and does not include an exception for the life and health of the pregnant person — or draws the exception more narrowly than EMTALA’s emergency medical condition definition — that state law is preempted. Please read this release from HHS: HHS Announces Guidance to Clarify that Emergency Medical Care Includes Abortion Services.
         The cruel overreach of the anti-choice fugitive laws will lead to a backlash that will ultimately reverse Dobbs and restore women’s rights to autonomy and control over reproductive choices. But only if we mobilize around this issue as never before.
Secret Service erased all text messages from January 5th and 6th after receiving a request from January 6th Committee.
         In a world teeming with conspiracy theories, we must guard against the contagion of seeing conspiracies in innocent coincidences. But the revelation that the Secret Service deleted all text messages sent on January 5th and 6th AFTER the January 6th Committee requested those messages raises a strong inference of misconduct by the Secret Service. See CNN, Secret Service erased text messages from January 5 and 6, 2021 -- after oversight officials asked for them, watchdog says.
         The actions of the Secret Service on January 6th were already suspect—as demonstrated by the fact that Mike Pence did not trust the Secret Service enough to get in a car driven by a Secret Service agent. Pence claimed he wanted to avoid the optics of the Vice President fleeing the Capitol, but others said that Pence (and his advisors) believed the Secret Service would “fly Pence to Alaska.” See HuffPo, Pence Rebuffed Secret Service Plan To Leave Capitol, Fearing A Halt To Electoral Vote Duty. In other words, Pence worried that the Secret Service was part of the plot to stop the electoral count.
         The Secret Service claims that the messages were “lost as a result of a “device-replacement program.” That claim is laughable and insulting. Texts do not reside only “on devices,” they reside on computer servers that are regularly backed up. If the Secret Service is incapable of backing up its servers daily, everyone in the Secret Service should be fired. Everyone.
         Imagine if you walked into an Apple store and said, “I want to buy a new MacBook,” and the salesperson said, “Sure, but that means that we will wipe out all of your emails, pictures, texts, and documents.” Any reasonably informed consumer would say, “But those files all exist in iCloud; why are you saying they erased simply because I am getting a new device?” The answer, of course, is that getting a new device has nothing to do with erasing documents backed up to computer servers.
         Someone in the Secret Service is lying about the existence of the text messages or has deliberately erased multiple copies of the texts—an extraordinarily difficult task. Not to worry; copies will be found. As with all information, there is always more than a single copy of the texts. Computer servers are backed up daily on a rotating basis using different backup tapes. If someone really “erased the texts,” they erased multiple copies of the texts on multiple backup tapes.
         I do not want to be a conspiracy theorist, but a reasonable supposition is that the Secret Service is concealing the illegal conduct of some of its agents on January 6th. Don’t believe me? Consider this:  Washington Post: Secret Service officer placed under investigation after accusing lawmakers of treason on social media. Per the Post, the suspended Secret Service Officer posted the following on social media on January 6th and 7th:
“Here's to the Peaceful Transition of Power" with President Donald Trump shaking hands with himself in the Oval Office. A day after the siege on the US Capitol, a comment was posted using the officer's name that criticized attempts to remove Trump from office and accused lawmakers who accepted the electoral college vote of “committing treason on live tv.” He wrote, “Good morning patriots! Yesterday started out beautiful and as usual Antifa soured the mood and attacked police and an Air Force veteran was murdered. It's OFFENSE time finally!!”
         If the DOJ hasn’t already opened a criminal investigation of this obvious effort to obstruct justice (and possibly cover up the agency’s assistance in the coup), everyone at the DOJ Main Justice should be fired, too. Everyone. The Secret Service felt comfortable erasing the texts because they believed the DOJ would do nothing. That belief is rooted in reality. Let’s hope Merrick Garland addresses the American people on Friday to announce an investigation.
         I hope my views on this topic are spectacularly, embarrassingly wrong. The thought that the Secret Service participated in a plot to keep Trump in power is frightening. But we need to know the truth.
Manchin kills any chance of reconciliation bill.
         Read this: WaPo, Manchin says he won’t support new climate spending, tax hikes on wealthy. We can’t blame Joe Biden for inaction unless we give him a majority in the Senate—which he currently does not have.
Concluding Thoughts.
         As we head into the weekend, I expect a spate of doomsday articles copycatting the NYTimes front-page treatment of its most recent polling about the midterms with Sienna College. I won’t go into detail because I think the poll is essentially an excuse for journalists to write about their pet theories on the current state of politics.
         Anyone who fails to see that this moment is unlike any in the last hundred years must look up from their smartphone and spreadsheets to engage in a few moments of reflection. The January 6th hearings are extraordinary. The ruling in Dobbs is extraordinary. The confluence of the “concealed carry” ruling in Bruen with mass killings in Buffalo, Uvalde, and Highland Park is extraordinary. The dissolution of the separation of church and state in Bremerton is extraordinary. The effort of GOP legislators to turn women into fugitives is extraordinary.
         Any journalist who ignores those facts to write a story that views the midterms through the lens of gas prices and Joe Biden’s favorability ratings is incurious, lazy, and in the wrong profession. We are living in a moment like no other in the last century. Journalists ignore that truth at their peril.
         To be clear, I am not saying we are guaranteed to win in 2022 and 2024. We are not. But let’s at least acknowledge that the American people are not unidimensional cogs whose political thinking starts and ends with “Gas prices high, vote for Republican.” Please give us a little more credit than that.
         So, as always, I urge you to focus on the task at hand and avoid excessive worry about headlines crafted to maximize clicks. Your work is real; headlines are information for consideration, nothing more, nothing less. Stay strong, get some rest over the weekend, and show up Monday morning ready for duty!
         Talk to you on Monday.
4 notes · View notes
evilsexy · 2 years
Text
so i'm doing my annual re-read of The Secret History and i swear to god i never ever realized richard papen's real name is fucking JOHN
5 notes · View notes
memoriae-lectoris · 4 months
Text
In 1942, when Japanese torpedoes struck the USS Lexington, then the second-largest aircraft carrier in the navy’s arsenal, the crew abandoned ship—but not before breaking into the freezer and raiding all the ice cream. Survivors describe scooping it into their helmets before lowering themselves into shark-infested waters.
US bomber crews used to make ice cream while flying over enemy territory after figuring out that they could strap buckets of ice cream mix to the outside of their planes during missions; by the time they landed, the mix would have frozen in the cold temperature of high altitude and been churned smooth by engine vibrations and turbulence, if not machine-gun fire and midair explosions. And soldiers on the ground took to using their helmets as mixing bowls to improvise ice cream from snow and melted chocolate bars.
Ice cream became so tied to national morale, in fact, that when the most decorated member of the Marine Corps, General Lewis B. “Chesty” Puller, called it a “sissy food” in the 1950s and tried to convince his marines that they’d be tougher on a diet of beer and whiskey, he drew so much national backlash that the Pentagon had to intervene with an official statement promising ice cream would be served no less than three times a week.
0 notes