#𝐒𝐇𝐎𝐑𝐓 𝐃𝐑𝐀𝐁𝐁𝐋𝐄: ANGST
「 satoru gojo x gender neutral! reader 」
GENRE: angst and fluff im feeling evil 2day
CONTENT WARNING: depression, gojo being an unhealthy entp and r! being an unhealthy enfj, sum miscommunication, not sure if this has a happy ending, pstd, issues 😓, established relationship, toxic relationship but its bc theyre both unhealthy and theyre trying to fix it (its not working)
AUTHORS NOTE: i need to see more angst posts of this man cuz im feeling devious 🤤
gojo satoru is insensitive. it shows and it’s true. he’s too egotistical, too stupid, too cocky, and even though he can see through people with his six eyes, his growing ego blinds his eye sight.
some may say it’s just him being him but he’s arrogant and extremely self absorbed, it’s unhealthy. this relationship is unhealthy, you’re both unhealthy.
they both can tear people to shreds with their sarcasm, regardless of the fact that it’s play fighting, some words sting most of the times.
the relationship shouldn’t have lasted this long, you were shocked by how long it’s been since everything started.
you two should’ve broken up a long time ago but the “love” you held for eachother were too strong that parting ways could easily lead eachother back to their beds.
when you sense an argument, the both of you turn into hypocrites. you’re emotionally manipulative and gojo likes rationalizing everything, even your bad habits.
despite how lovely you two actually are, no one’s aware that you both are horrible people, especially to eachother.
you two are the calm before the storm, a good duo to hang out with, terrifying to go against.
miscommunication happens. it’s been like that for while, apologies always happen the next day. they say “they’ll never do it again” but it happens almost every 2 months.
relationship’s have their ups and downs. every time you try to talk it out with gojo, the two of you get argumentative and break eachother down. no matter how hard you two try to work it out, it never works and goes back to being unhealthy.
gojo satoru isn’t a good boyfriend.
neither are you.
143 notes
·
View notes
MBTI INFP romantic pairings and couples:
Lol yes it’s back! A lot of people seemed to really like those posts, so I thought I'd do an update since I found a couple more examples recently. However this time I'm gonna compile them all into this one post instead doing individual all over again lol. I compiled a pretty good list so I hope you guys like it! Also Happy 69th post! Woohoo! 🥳 (Yes I’m childish like that lmao)
Carlos de Vil (INFP) and Jane (ISFJ) - Descendants
Ashlynn Ella (INFP) and Hunter Huntsman (ISFP) - Ever After High
Sybil Crawley (INFP) and Tom Branson (ENTP) - Downtown Abbey
Furukawa Nagisa (INFP) and Okazaki Tomoya (ISFP) - Clannad
Allison Cameron (INFP) and Gregory House (INTJ) - House M.D
(I was hesitant to put this one bc they technically weren't really ever a thing but they did have feelings for each other)
Allison Cameron (INFP) and Robert Chase (ISTP) - House M.D
Allen Ginsberg (INFP) and Lucien Carr (ENFP) - Kill Your Darlings
I was hesitant to include them as well because they have a complex relationship, but I don't wanna spoil lol. So for those of you who do know what I mean, I'd honestly just say it depends on your pov (like with house and cameron).
Agustin (INFP) and Julieta (ISFJ) Madrigal - Encanto
Cameron James (INFP) and Bianca Stratford (ESFJ) - 10 Things I Hate About You
Izumi Miyamura (INFP) and Kyouko Hori (ESFJ) - Horimiya
Kou Sakuragi (INFP) and Naoya Nifuji (ENFJ) - Wotaki
**Note, I think most of their screen time together as a couple is in the OVA
Dorthy Boyd (INFP) and Jerry Maguire (ESFJ/ENFJ)
It's been a while since I've seen the movie but ik he's def Fe dom.
Mia Thermopolis (INFP) and Michael Moscovitz (ISFP) - Princess Diaries
Mia Thermopolis (INFP) and Nicholas Devereaux (ESTP) - Princess Diaries 2
Alrighty that's it for now lol
Let me know what you think! :) Feel free to share any thoughts or recommendations!
169 notes
·
View notes
About MBTI romantic compatibility
In this post I want to talk about my personal thoughts based on what I observe about MBTI romantic compatibility or romantic compatibility in general.
Because remember, MBTI isn't enough when looking for a partner; there can be:
Very different people of the same type
Similar people of very different types
It also depends on what similitarities and differences mean for you.
MBTI: COMPATIBLE, SIMILIAR, DIFFERENT
Think at colors: there are colours which matches armonically to you but maybe you still preferer a "very similar" colour that accompany you or "very different" one that make you natural color stands up
1) COMPATIBLE if you look for an armonical balance between your differences (dichotomies) and similarities (same primary function but inverted and same process thoughts of the other two functions)
E/I + P/J difference or also F/T or N/S depending on what is the primary function (change the other). F/T or N/S lead to apparently more differences but deeply same way to process some thoughts (exactly same middle cognitive functions)
Example: INTJ x ENFP or ENTP
Example: ISFP x ESFJ or ENFJ
2) SIMILIAR: same type or similiar in many things (but not having the same primary function and thinking process can still lead to a not so small difference): you prefer having more similitarities with your partner (e.g. both introverted)
Change just a letter (be conscious that usually the S/N difference alone could still lead to a strong difference)
Example: INTJ x INTJ or ENTJ or INFJ or INTP (or also ISTJ)
ABOUT changing only the last 2 dichotomies: it will lead to a more complex mix between similarities and differences, usually it can be great at times but can also lead to many misunderstandings, for this reason I see more friendships than romantic partners on these.
Example: INTJ x INFP
Example: ESTP x ESFJ
3) DIFFERENT: very different type or opposite type: you feel safe with a companion that can do the things you can't do.
Example: INTJ x ESFP, ESTP, ESTJ, ISFJ,...
Is it immature?
If all you look for is just a personality type yes, but if you consider many things among which a specifically personality type... no. People choose their partner based on physical appearance, interests, sympathy, familiarity, style of life... and choosing based on the way a person perceive and process reality that affect every part of their daily life is nothing but deep.
"BUT if you both are willing to make it work..."
I will be honest here on my opinion. We are not talking about getting along with colleagues or in family or something forced, but with romantic relationships. It's so natural to look for a "compatible" friendship, why not with romance? Friends can be many while a romantic partner is hopefully just one and for every day of our life; and every relationship is already difficult by itself without us making it more complicated. We will live and share everything with our partner, make decisions with them, see and talk to them everyday: for this reason I personally don't see why we can't be selective.
So... is MBTI compatibility important? Depends
My personal opinion is that compatibility in general is very important, but not each couple needs MBTI compatibility to work well.
Your perfect match depends on who you are and what you look for in a partner.
-> Some thoughts to consider for wishing to have MBTI compatibility or not:
If your MBTI type is a huge part of who you are and your mental process - choose YES
Passions, interests, character and other things have a huge impact of who or your partner are more than MBTI - choose NO
You are selective and look for deep understanding of who you are to feel completely gotten - choose YES
You get along easily with others and feeling get is not your primary need (or not by a partner), you enjoy and look for other things - choose NO
Your process thoughts deeply, analyse others and observe a lot - choose YES
You are in tune with the ambience more than focusing too deeply on the others, you are more practical and a doer - choose NO
IMPORTANT CONSIDERATIONS
Your answer can be different of the one of your partner. For example an INFJ chooses her ENFP for MBTI compatibility because she wants to have long conversations and feel mentally connected with him while ENFP chooses her for the way she treats him and prefers spending time doing some hobbies together. So their relationship's will won't match.
If you wish for MBTI compatibility:
I will repeat it another time: MBTI isn't enough! There are always other things that defines us as values, humour, interests, style of life, mentality. So your life partner will be one of the personalities you get along with: not all will work perfectly with you!
MBTI isn't a guarantee! There is no perfect balance and every couple needs work.
If you wish for other kind of compatibilities:
Still be conscious about your personalities! Sometimes feelings cover our differences and you are ok with how are some things now but maybe in the future you or your partner will look for other things.
Be aware! Not thinking about it doesn't remove their type and your similarities/differences, the best is knowing your MBTI types and still be sure it's the best for you! MBTI knowledge in any case could always help in your journey.
Some example of couples I know:
MBTI compatible couples:
ISFP x ENFJ: natural match and they also share the same way to see life - worked
ESFP x ISFJ: compatible but the mental disorders of one destroyed their relationships and also their interests didn't match - didn't work
Not MBTI compatible couples:
INFP x ISTJ: they have the same values of family and both looked for a companion that can do what they couldn't, and feel safe in the differences of the other - worked
INFP x ESTJ: they loved the differences because they made them feel safe, during life they realized they needed to feel understood by the other and suffered for the lack of similitarities - didn't work
FINAL THOUGHTS
Be careful and choose what is best for YOU depending on what you and your partner look for in a relationship. Because at the end knowing what you want in your love life and waiting until you find it is the most important thing! If you want read this last part by thinking at different characteristics other than MBTI.
Different partner: more work to to but they can help you with doing the things you can't do. Always looking for an opposite partner can be sometimes linked to low self esteem, or positively to a strong adaptation ability.
Similiar partner: less work to do but you will have the same limits and face the same problems. Always looking for a very similar partner can be sometimes a sign of immaturity, or positively of a sensitive trait.
I'll say it again:
I talked about MBTI compatibility but remember that MBTI doesn't describe us totally so choose wisely considering that person completely!
And work with your defects and mental disorders, with them every relationship is destined to fail or be unhealthy or toxic.
Maybe you are thinking "love is blind"... to our mind maybe yes, but unconsciously is linked to how we see ourselves deeply.
Feelings may last some time but having a partner hopefully will last a life.
I wish you all the best love life :)
226 notes
·
View notes
You’re always talking about how much you like INTJs. Would you consider any other MBTI type as a potential partner or is it just INTJs for you? And why?
Of course, I could consider other MBTI types as potential romantic partners besides INTJs.♥️
My preference would probably be something like this:
INTJs > ISTJs > ENTJs > ESTJs > ENTPs > INTPs > ISTPs > ENFJs.
When it comes to friendships, I’m quite flexible.
However, I’ve found that the least compatible types for me, so far, have been (in no particular order):
ESFPs, ESTPs, and some unhealthy ISFPs and unhealthy INFPs. I never met healthy ISFPs but healthy INFPs are absolutely adorable to me (like my 🧛🏻♀️🫀-anon, for example).
I also really enjoy having ENFJs and ESFJs as friends. My two closest friends are an ESFJ and an ENFP. I sometimes struggle to keep up with the dominant Ne of ENFPs (or ENTPs), so I try to take a step back from time to time, but they always seem to become quite obsessed with me, so it’s not really possible. (Weird, weird.)
I hope this clarifies everything!♥️ Have a delightful day/night!♥️
9 notes
·
View notes
Now let's flip around the orientation of the functions and types. As mentioned previously, introverts like a static and predictable external world to reformulate their impressions, as an ever changing world is unmanageable and overwhelming...
Extraverts, on the other hand, gladly flow with the moving present. However, Reality can cause anybody to lose their sense of self if being overly associated with its vast randomness. Hence extraverts rely on their impressions about the chaotic world as their internal compass. This is the extraverts' foundation of their reality. Fi- users stand on hard values and beliefs, Ti- users stand on hard logic and principles.
And just like how introverts may be reluctant to rebuild their external foundations, the same can be said for extraverts to rebuild their internal foundations. The extreme ones avoid looking internally, it gives sense they're running away from themselves. The vast majority take responsibility of their influence, and think through before setting their actions.
They may not ruminate with themselves, but more often go about by researching, using soundboards, trialing, and playing out possibilities. They still interact with an external medium rather being completely detached like introverts do.
Their experiences is similar to the introverts' with a forward momentum:
Ne+ holds a panoramic view accounting nuances by boiling them all down into fundamental Si- patterns. Ne+ scans over all situations, Si- looks for what's always true.
Se+ holds a microscopic view absorbing all details to gain a Ni- comprehensive idea. Se+ learns all it can, yet Ni- doesn't feel it has seen enough.
But we're all in varying degrees both introverted and extraverted. Our internal impressions get rusty or distorted. Reality is too big for us to encompass everything, so we work within realistic parameters.
Continuously rebuilding the foundations of our reality is our journey!
33 notes
·
View notes