#negative article removal | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

renushekhawat804 · 2 months ago

Text

How Reputation Monitoring Helps In Maintaining a Positive Online Presence

Everything matters for a brand’s name in the digital era nowadays. So, to succeed, it is very essential to have a positive appearance on the Internet, bearing in mind that customers depend more on Internet information. Reputation monitoring helps in improving safeguarding and maintaining the image of the organizations which is predetermined by this concept of the term user’s opinion concerning worth considering. This can be done through professional online reputation management to maintain trust with customers.

Comprehending Reputation Monitoring

Reputation monitoring refers to managing what is being talked about about a specified brand on different internet areas. It can comprise keeping tabs on customer reviews, the company’s mentions on social media, news items, blog postings, and other forms of online information that alter the perception people have toward brands. Its essence is to learn more about how people feel in general about a particular issue or deal with problems as they come up so that the business maintains a good reputation.

A Positive Online Presence

The significance of a valuable presence on the internet is important. When customers read the reviews they trust the judgment of other customers and their own experiences that they have gone through. A powerful internet image could get you more clients and keep the old ones close enough to sustain the growth of the company. That is where Repute matters services come in.

Key Benefits of Reputation Monitoring

Proactive Issue Resolution: Reputation monitoring is important as it enables companies to quickly spot and react to negative comments or ratings, thus preventing possible outweighing of a brand’s name while showing that a business cares about its clients by resolving any emerging problem.

Enhanced Customer Trust: Customer trust can be improved by posting positive reviews and testimonials. Monitoring reputation allows businesses to emphasize good comments, use them in creating a reliable brand, and thus attract more customers. In so doing, people make decisions on the basis of buying.

Competitive Advantage: Monitoring competitors’ online reputations provides valuable insights into market trends and consumer preferences; and highlights areas that distinguish our brand from others. As such businesses can use this competitive intelligence to up their game and stay on top of things in the business world.

Brand Perception Management: By monitoring brand image, an organization can control what others will see online so that it holds true to the standards upheld by customers while still representing what it stands for before market competitors. Continuous tracking will ensure that any improper behavior isn’t allowed since such actions would damage one’s good name.

SEO Benefits: It increases your company’s visibility on search engines because it possesses the following characteristics, social media notifications made more often by satisfied customers about your company’s products as evidenced by online testimonials from happy clients are important for creating content among online users who will then buy from them in future.

Implementing Effective Reputation Monitoring Strategies with Professionals To manage online reputation in relation to businesses effectively, the following strategies are used by our ORM experts in Dwarka, Delhi:

Utilize Monitoring Tools: Reputation monitoring tools and software are used by our experts for monitoring… read more https://reputematters.com/how-reputation-monitoring-helps-in-maintaining-a-positive-online-presence/

#Manage Google Autocomplete #Best ORM Company in India #Negative Content Removal Services #Online Reputation Management Services #Remove News Articles From Google

0 notes

jassdigitalmedia · 9 months ago

Text

Guide to Negative Google Review Removal

Repute Matters offers a wide range of services, from monitoring your online presence and removing fake reviews to addressing negative feedback and improving ...

#fake removal reviews #remove google reviews from business #remove news article from the internet #remove news articles from google #remove negative content #remove indeed reviews #remove a negative google review #delete negative google reviews #remove reviews #negative content #negative google review removal

0 notes

sophiamcdougall · 2 years ago

Text

You're a reasonably informed person on the internet. You've experienced things like no longer being able to get files off an old storage device, media you've downloaded suddenly going poof, sites and forums with troves full of people's thoughts and ideas vanishing forever. You've heard of cybercrime. You've read articles about lost media. You have at least a basic understanding that digital data is vulnerable, is what I'm saying. I'm guessing that you're also aware that history is, you know... important? And that it's an ongoing study, requiring ... data about how people live? And that it's not just about stanning celebrities that happen to be dead? Congratulations, you are significantly better-informed than the British government! So they're currently like "Oh hai can we destroy all these historical documents pls? To save money? Because we'll digitise them first so it's fine! That'll be easy, cheap and reliable -- right? These wills from the 1850s will totally be fine for another 170 years as a PNG or whatever, yeah? We didn't need to do an impact assesment about this because it's clearly win-win! We'd keep the physical wills of Famous People™ though because Famous People™ actually matter, unlike you plebs. We don't think there are any equalities implications about this, either! Also the only examples of Famous People™ we can think of are all white and rich, only one is a woman and she got famous because of the guy she married. Kisses!"

Yes, this is the same Government that's like "Oh no removing a statue of slave trader is erasing history :(" You have, however, until 23 February 2024 to politely inquire of them what the fuck they are smoking. And they will have to publish a summary of the responses they receive. And it will look kind of bad if the feedback is well-argued, informative and overwhelmingly negative and they go ahead and do it anyway. I currently edit documents including responses to consultations like (but significantly less insane) than this one. Responses do actually matter. I would particularly encourage British people/people based in the UK to do this, but as far as I can see it doesn't say you have to be either. If you are, say, a historian or an archivist, or someone who specialises in digital data do say so and draw on your expertise in your answers. This isn't a question of filling out a form. You have to manually compose an email answering the 12 questions in the consultation paper at the link above. I'll put my own answers under the fold. Note -- I never know if I'm being too rude in these sorts of things. You probably shouldn't be ruder than I have been.

Please do not copy and paste any of this: that would defeat the purpose. This isn't a petition, they need to see a range of individual responses. But it may give you a jumping-off point.

Question 1: Should the current law providing for the inspection of wills be preserved?

Yes. Our ability to understand our shared past is a fundamental aspect of our heritage. It is not possible for any authority to know in advance what future insights they are supporting or impeding by their treatment of material evidence. Safeguarding the historical record for future generations should be considered an extremely important duty.

Question 2: Are there any reforms you would suggest to the current law enabling wills to be inspected?

No.

Question 3: Are there any reasons why the High Court should store original paper will documents on a permanent basis, as opposed to just retaining a digitised copy of that material?

Yes. I am amazed that the recent cyber attack on the British Library, which has effectively paralysed it completely, not been sufficient to answer this question for you. I also refer you to the fate of the Domesday Project. Digital storage is useful and can help more people access information; however, it is also inherently fragile. Malice, accident, or eventual inevitable obsolescence not merely might occur, but absolutely should be expected. It is ludicrously naive and reflects a truly unpardonable ignorance to assume that information preserved only in digital form is somehow inviolable and safe, or that a physical document once digitised, never need be digitised again..At absolute minimum, it should be understood as certain that at least some of any digital-only archive will eventually be permanently lost. It is not remotely implausible that all of it would be. Preserving the physical documents provides a crucial failsafe. It also allows any errors in reproduction -- also inevitable-- to be, eventually, seen and corrected. Note that maintaining, upgrading and replacing digital infrastructure is not free, easy or reliable. Over the long term, risks to the data concerned can only accumulate.

"Unlike the methods for preserving analog documents that have been honed over millennia, there is no deep precedence to look to regarding the management of digital records. As such, the processing, long-term storage, and distribution potential of archival digital data are highly unresolved issues. [..] the more digital data is migrated, translated, and re-compressed into new formats, the more room there is for information to be lost, be it at the microbit-level of preservation. Any failure to contend with the instability of digital storage mediums, hardware obsolescence, and software obsolescence thus meets a terminal end—the definitive loss of information. The common belief that digital data is safe so long as it is backed up according to the 3-2-1 rule (3 copies on 2 different formats with 1 copy saved off site) belies the fact that it is fundamentally unclear how long digital information can or will remain intact. What is certain is that its unique vulnerabilities do become more pertinent with age." -- James Boyda, On Loss in the 21st Century: Digital Decay and the Archive, Introduction.

Question 4: Do you agree that after a certain time original paper documents (from 1858 onwards) may be destroyed (other than for famous individuals)? Are there any alternatives, involving the public or private sector, you can suggest to their being destroyed?

Absolutely not. And I would have hoped we were past the "great man" theory of history. Firstly, you do not know which figures will still be considered "famous" in the future and which currently obscure individuals may deserve and eventually receive greater attention. I note that of the three figures you mention here as notable enough to have their wills preserved, all are white, the majority are male (the one woman having achieved fame through marriage) and all were wealthy at the time of their death. Any such approach will certainly cull evidence of the lives of women, people of colour and the poor from the historical record, and send a clear message about whose lives you consider worth remembering.

Secondly, the famous and successsful are only a small part of our history. Understanding the realities that shaped our past and continue to mould our present requires evidence of the lives of so-called "ordinary people"!

Did you even speak to any historians before coming up with this idea?

Entrusting the documents to the private sector would be similarly disastrous. What happens when a private company goes bust or decides that preserving this material is no longer profitable? What reasonable person, confronted with our crumbling privatised water infrastructure, would willingly consign any part of our heritage to a similar fate?

Question 5: Do you agree that there is equivalence between paper and digital copies of wills so that the ECA 2000 can be used?

No. And it raises serious questions about the skill and knowledge base within HMCTS and the government that the very basic concepts of data loss and the digital dark age appear to be unknown to you. I also refer you to the Domesday Project.

Question 6: Are there any other matters directly related to the retention of digital or paper wills that are not covered by the proposed exercise of the powers in the ECA 2000 that you consider are necessary?

Destroying the physical documents will always be an unforgivable dereliction of legal and moral duty.

Question 7: If the Government pursues preserving permanently only a digital copy of a will document, should it seek to reform the primary legislation by introducing a Bill or do so under the ECA 2000?

Destroying the physical documents will always be an unforgivable dereliction of legal and moral duty.

Question 8: If the Government moves to digital only copies of original will documents, what do you think the retention period for the original paper wills should be? Please give reasons and state what you believe the minimum retention period should be and whether you consider the Government’s suggestion of 25 years to be reasonable.

There is no good version of this plan. The physical documents should be preserved.

Question 9: Do you agree with the principle that wills of famous people should be preserved in the original paper form for historic interest?

This question betrays deep ignorance of what "historic interest" actually is. The study of history is not simply glorified celebrity gossip. If anything, the physical wills of currently famous people could be considered more expendable as it is likely that their contents are so widely diffused as to be relatively "safe", whereas the wills of so-called "ordinary people" will, especially in aggregate, provide insights that have not yet been explored.

Question 10: Do you have any initial suggestions on the criteria which should be adopted for identifying famous/historic figures whose original paper will document should be preserved permanently?

Abandon this entire lamentable plan. As previously discussed, you do not and cannot know who will be considered "famous" in the future, and fame is a profoundly flawed criterion of historical significance.

Question 11: Do you agree that the Probate Registries should only permanently retain wills and codicils from the documents submitted in support of a probate application? Please explain, if setting out the case for retention of any other documents.

No, all the documents should be preserved indefinitely.

Question 12: Do you agree that we have correctly identified the range and extent of the equalities impacts under each of these proposals set out in this consultation? Please give reasons and supply evidence of further equalities impacts as appropriate.

No. You appear to have neglected equalities impacts entirely. As discussed, in your drive to prioritise "famous people", your plan will certainly prioritise the white, wealthy and mostly the male, as your "Charles Dickens, Charles Darwin and Princess Diana" examples amply indicate. This plan will create a two-tier system where evidence of the lives of the privileged is carefully preserved while information regarding people of colour, women, the working class and other disadvantaged groups is disproportionately abandoned to digital decay and eventual loss. Current and future historians from, or specialising in the history of minority groups will be especially impoverished by this.

#ukpol #uk politics #fuck the tories #lost media #data loss #cultural vandalism

16K notes · View notes

buildbrandbetter · 1 year ago

Text

From Negative to Positive: How Personal Branding Services Can Remove Negative Search Results

In today's digital age, your online presence can make or break your personal brand. With the vast amount of information available at our fingertips, it's crucial to ensure that what people see when they search for you online is positive and reflects your true identity. Unfortunately, negative search results can tarnish your reputation and hinder your success. That's where personal branding services come in, offering solutions to remove negative content and transform your online image from negative to positive.

At Build Brand Better, we understand the importance of maintaining a strong online reputation. Our personal branding services are designed to help individuals like you take control of their online presence and eliminate harmful search results. Whether it's negative articles, reviews, or social media posts, our team of experts has the tools and expertise to remove them from search engine results pages (SERPs) effectively.

So, how exactly do personal branding services work to remove negative search results? Let's break it down:

Comprehensive Analysis: The first step is to conduct a thorough analysis of your online presence to identify any negative content that may be impacting your reputation. This includes searching for negative articles, reviews, and other mentions across various platforms.

Strategic Approach: Once the negative content has been identified, our team develops a strategic plan to address each issue systematically. This may involve reaching out to website owners to request the removal of harmful content or implementing search engine optimization (SEO) techniques to push negative results down in the rankings.

Content Creation: In addition to removing negative content, we also focus on creating and promoting positive content that accurately reflects your personal brand. This may include professional profiles, blog posts, social media profiles, and press releases designed to showcase your expertise and accomplishments.

Monitoring and Maintenance: Our work doesn't stop once the negative content has been removed. We continue to monitor your online presence regularly to ensure that no new negative content surfaces. Additionally, we provide ongoing support and guidance to help you maintain a positive online reputation in the long run.

By leveraging personal branding services, you can reclaim control of your online narrative and present yourself in the best possible light. Whether you're a business professional, entrepreneur, or public figure, a positive online reputation is essential for building trust and credibility with your audience.

In conclusion, negative search results can have a significant impact on your personal brand and professional success. However, with the help of personal branding services, you can remove negative content and turn the tide in your favor. At Build Brand Better, we're dedicated to helping you build and maintain a positive online reputation that accurately reflects who you are and what you stand for. Contact us today to learn more about how we can help you achieve your branding goals.

#suppress negative google results #remove fake review #remove bad google results #remove negative google results #remove negative results from google #remove negative search results #remove negative search engine results #remove negative content #personal branding service #remove negative articles from google #personal brand services #remove negative content from google #bad google review removal #brand management companies #brand reputation management agency

0 notes

makingqueerhistory · 7 months ago

Text

":')))))))) you realise that gen AI is available to everyone though right??? Queer creators can use it just as much as anyone else??? I just don't understand this post... It really feels like a cheap way to get on the 'AI Bad's bandwagon, and coming from such a thoughtful and insightful creator that's incredibly disappointing... It's okay to not comment on subjects you're not an expert in y'know...?"

Y'all know the drill, I am replying to this publicly but that is not an invitation to send any negative messages to the person I am replying to.

Anyways, let me start by saying that the original context of the post you're replying to is discussing an event where a queer org used generative AI to steal an interview with Keri Hulme. So let's start there. To be clear I don't even know if the original interviewer was queer so let's put the identities of stealer and stolen from to the side. I want to explain the harm done in this example specifically and I hope this is illustrative of what harm generative AI can (and does) do.

The original place I saw generative AI was a queer org that explicitly says they are using generative AI "for good", and as a way to bring more queer history to light. So let's take them at their word, and assume they are not out to cause harm. This is the best example of generative AI that I can imagine, so I hope that makes it clear that I am not coming at this issue from bad faith in any way.

Here is the harm they are causing:

Decontextualizing and rephrasing an interview: I am not going to pretend that I am an expert in academic best practices, but I do believe one thing, if a person is speaking on their own identity and lived experience, it is always much better to directly quote than it is to rephrase. As I read this source, I initially didn't know that it was AI, and I was already upset. An interview that is widely available on the internet with no pay wall, was poorly sourced and made more vague than it was in the initial text. By creating one degree of seperation between the original words of A WRITER (whose literal job was largely based in choosing the right words to describe experiences they had) harm is already done. It makes vague what was once clear, and removes Keri Hulme's voice from her own narrative.

The original interviewer is not paid, or given proper recognition: I get it, sometimes just copy pasting an interview doesn't feel transformative enough, but something that one would learn if they worked in the queer history field and weren't a literal robot rehashing what has already been said, is that not everything needs to be transformed. In those cases, we give credit to the person who said the original words (in this case Keri Hulme), and the interviewer who facillitated the conversation (in this case Shelley Bridgeman). This case (again a best case scenario), takes the attention and byline away from the original interviewer and gives it to an AI.

The original publisher of this story is deinsentivised from paying interviewers in the future: The original publisher of this interview has ads on their website. As a person who also has ads on their website, taking an article like this and rephrasing it for no good reason (the orginal word count was not prohibitive and the rephrasing did not make it more readable), takes money from the publisher. It's pennies, but it's also removing numbers could have been used to justify further interviews with asexual people and archiving of asexual stories. The org that stole from this publication does not interview people themselves so the money and numbers that could have gone to continue to preserve asexual stories goes to stealing them instead.

These are just the active harms that I saw in this specific case. As you said, I am not an expert in generative AI, and will not be speaking as if I am. But I will say that asking me not to speak out on active harm that is being caused in queer history spaces, is disrespectful to my many years in this field.

To illustrate this even clearer: if you were a patron, you would know I recently took down an old article. I have been rereading and editing our backlist of articles, and I found one that no longer fit my standards of sourcing. My standards had recently raised due to a video made by HBomberguy about someone in the queer history space who was stealing from other creators. I watched this video not as a work project, but because I watch most of HBomberguys videos, and this one made me think more critically about sourcing. An AI can't do that. All an AI has is what has been inputted, and it is right now impossible to input every available peice of information about ethics into an AI and get a coherent ethical basis on which it will function.

It is a distinctly human trait to absorb information and change in that way. AI can rephrase information that already exists, steal it, recontextualize it even, but it cannot create something altogether new.

Do I believe that there one day might be an ethical use for Generative AI? Maybe. Do I believe that coming into a queer history space, stealing the words of a Maori asexual author, rephrasing them, and giving the original interviewer and publication no form of compensation for their work, is accomplishing that? No.

On a more personal note: I am coming at this issue with a bias. As a queer history creator, I do not want AI in my space, because it is literally damaging to my financial prospects. It has been like pulling teeth to try and get patrons in the current state of the global economy. I don't blame anyone from that, but I feel very disrespected that I am being asked to compete with a machine now. Not only that, but I am being asked to shut up and be fine with it? No, absolutely not. I cannot and will not stay quiet as space that I have fought tooth and nail to create in mainstream discussions is taken and given to AI.

AI was not supporting me when I was sent gore to try and scare me off of discussing queer history. A person did that. AI was not there to tell me I had written too many sad stories, and I needed some happy endings to remind myself of the good in the world. A person did that. AI was not there when I was being harrassed for supporting and including asexual stories on my website. A person did that.

And after all that, I am being asked to lie down and take it when my ability to pay the people who supported me in those ways, is being threatened. Nope. Not going to happen.

An AI doesn't have to make rent. An AI doesn't understand what it feels like to have to stop holding their wife's hand in public. An AI didn't get calls from people needing comfort in reaction to the election. Pay me for my work, and get this AI nonsense out of my face.

#queer history #the restraint that it took not to swear in this response #was enormous

3K notes · View notes

reputematters2 · 1 month ago

Text

Unwanted images Removal Expert Company in Delhi

In the digital era, unwanted or inappropriate images online can seriously harm your personal or business reputation. If you’re searching for a reliable Unwanted Images Removal Expert Company in Delhi, look no further than professionals who specialize in digital content management and online reputation repair.

These experts understand the complexities of content removal across various platforms, including social media, websites, and search engines. With advanced techniques and ethical practices, the Unwanted Images Removal Expert Company in Delhi offers tailored solutions to swiftly identify, remove, or suppress unwanted images that may damage your brand or personal image.

By partnering with a trusted agency in Delhi, Repute Matters ensure that your online presence remains clean, professional, and positive. Whether it’s removing unauthorized photos, sensitive content, or misleading visuals, expert removal services help protect your privacy and enhance your digital reputation effectively.

#Manage Google Autocomplete #Best ORM Company in India #Negative Content Removal Services in delhi #Online Reputation Management Services #Remove News Articles From Google

0 notes

shubham987 · 1 month ago

Text

Reviews Management Services | Remove Glassdoor Negative Reviews

Reviews Management Services | Remove Glassdoor Negative Reviews support is essential to safeguard your organization’s reputation. Build Brand Better is a trusted leader in this space, offering specialized review management strategies that focus on addressing and minimizing the impact of negative content, particularly on employee-review platforms like Glassdoor.

Build Brand Better combines strategic insight with ethical practices to help businesses remove or suppress harmful content that violates platform policies or misrepresents the workplace environment. Whether you're dealing with fake employee reviews, disgruntled ex-staff venting unjustly, or outdated experiences that no longer reflect your current culture, Build Brand Better takes a proactive approach to remove Glassdoor negative reviews while maintaining legal and ethical compliance. Their expert team evaluates each case individually, identifying reviews that breach Glassdoor's content guidelines and initiating appropriate action, including formal reporting and content flagging.

In addition to removal efforts, Build Brand Better strengthens your brand reputation with a long-term focus. They design customized reviews management services to encourage genuine, positive reviews from current employees, creating a more accurate and favorable reflection of your company culture. This helps build trust not only among potential hires but also among stakeholders and clients researching your brand.

#Best Personal Brand Monitoring Agency #Manage Google Autocomplete #Negative Content Removal Services #Remove News Articles From Google #Google Review Removal Service #Online Reviews Management Company in delhi

0 notes

secureonline · 2 years ago

Text

Mastering Online Reputation Management: Strategies to Remove Negative News Articles

Mastering Online Reputation Management: Strategies to Remove Negative News Articles is a crucial skill in today's digital era. Learn how to effectively address concerns like delete news articles and how to get a news article removed from the internet. Discover tactics to overcome challenges such as how to get a newspaper article removed from the internet and how to remove news articles from Google. Embrace the power of online reputation management to proactively manage your digital image. By employing strategic methods, you can successfully remove negative news articles and maintain a positive online presence. Take charge and safeguard your reputation by efficiently removing negative news articles from the internet and controlling the narrative.

#delete news articles #how to get a news article removed from the interne #how to get a newspaper article removed from the internet #remove negative news articles #remove news article.

0 notes

fridaysmind · 8 months ago

Text

Living doll

Soft yandere!Knockout x reader

He's gorgeous and he knows it. You can't pass a guy like that up. English is not my first language, sorry.

Knockout didn't like organic life forms and he couldn't be blamed for that, more than half the population of his and a few other planets supported and understood the sentiment. There was a lot of organics in the Universe, a variety of creatures met on his way and on the way of others traveling through the vastness of space. Needless to say, they were disgusting in their own way. Spitting slime, devouring everything in their path or just chewing on something stinky and slimy. They're filthy and disrespectful. What an abomination.

So stopping on a planet full of similar creatures didn't please any of them. But maybe he was wrong about the whole negative assessment, slightly. He loved their races, he loved their media space, their hilarious reactions to everything that happened. But he loved his pet even more.

The grace was the lack of interest and questioning about his life. Is he on the spot when medical attention is needed? Good. He went on a mission and at least he didn't die? Then he's free to go. Where he was and who he was with in his free time was nobody's concern and for a while it might have touched his spark, but not now. His little secret is safe, hidden from prying eyes. First just an interest stolen for his own gain and study, then, after the loss of his partner, his comfort, and in the wake of that, addiction.

He needs to escape from his workplace, just for a little while, to hold the soft you in his manipulators. He needs to tuck himself into a human movie with your sweet voice and commentary on the silly actions of the characters. He needs your warmth pressed against his shoulder while you help polish the places he has trouble reaching. That's so sweet of you, because now no one else will come to his rescue. That's one of the many reasons to love you even more.

There are many other reasons, but they can boil down to one thing: you're not like everyone else. Anything he might find repulsive in others is simply not in the nature of your personality. He discovered this back when he was able to get you into his interior for the first time, Primus gracious, you had the good sense to take your flimsy and filthy armor off your legs, hold it in your hands the whole ride, and keep him clean! He was ready to kiss your head at this point!

Knockout loved to groom his precious pet. He had read so many articles and books on human hygiene and beauty that there was no one on Nemesis, no, on all of Cybertron, who was or would be more professional than he. The territory that had belonged to Breakdown was drearily deserted, but the comrade wouldn't mind if his place was put to good use, would he? All shelves and surfaces are now occupied with jars, sponges and bottles.

Knockout loves to take a bath with you. Technically, you're the one who washing, human cleaning products leave streaks and are ineffective on him, and the pressure of his shower is too rough for delicate human skin. So he's bathing you. His pet didn't like it at first. Оf course, he knew too little then and human boundaries. Turns out humans hide the crotch and breast plate areas too. Buying, though more like stealing, fabric for the important places calmed you down, though also after a few tries.

Knockout appreciates a perfect shine, so his pet should shine too. Forgetting all body hair, he will meticulously remove everything but your head so that nothing interferes with the shine of your skin, and then gently sit you down in warm, almost hot water. He steams your skin, rubs all the places well, twirls your figure in his palms and enjoys your appearance, chooses the smell of the gel according to his mood, does not forget the masks and his favorite part - creams.

Mech won't admit it to you, much less to anyone else, not even himself, but your damp, soft skin, into which he rubs the sweet-smelling cream in circles, seems to be driving him slightly insane, giving him glimpses of strange thoughts he doesn't want to ponder further. He just enjoys your scent, your warmth, your quiet voice, fighting the urge to just eat you up because of how adorable you are.

He doesn't want anyone to know about you. When Knockout blabbed to Starscream that he'd seen zombies in a human movie, he stopped himself a split second before talking about your funny comment. It was as if an electric shock ran through his body, and he swallowed the sudden fear.

It hit the doctor.

What will he do if others find out about you? What will they do? Will they use you? Take you away so they have someone to vent their anger on? Throw you out because he's spending too much time on you? What percentage of you are even safe? So often he'd just leave you in his compartment and go on shift, even if he'd run to you on breaks under the pretext of ‘make sure I'm as beautiful as usual at the moment', but he could have higher-ranking Decepticons coming in, they had every right to, and there you were, defenseless and so small.

***

He may be paranoid, so what? Doing a little more than necessary never hurt anyone. You're confused that the new bracelet doesn't come off in any way, looking almost like a handcuff on your arm, but that shouldn't mess with your nicely styled head. Now he can track your every move and may you not know it yourself. He's nobly arranged for you to have your own corner on his desk, behind the datapads, so you won't be throwing yourself into the optics if someone walks in. But it didn't make him feel any better.

Knockout has already had someone dear to him taken away, someone close to his spark and no one cared. He can't lose you, too. So he clings to you more and more with each sunrise, not wanting to leave the compartment, not wanting to part with you, not wanting to leave your warm organic fingers.

As he walks down the corridors, he thinks about the fact that he really would go to great lengths to keep things the way they are now. The thought of being willing to betray the Decepticon cause for the sake of your collective safety halted his stride and made him look away warily. Even if he did, he would never, ever say that to anyone.

#transformers #transformers headcanons #tfp #tf prime #headcanon #knockout #yandere transformers #yandere tfp #yandere knockout #yandere #soft yandere #fridays mind fic

505 notes · View notes

prettieinpink · 2 years ago

Text

Cultivating a Growth Mindset

A growth mindset is the belief that one's skills, qualities, and abilities can be nurtured and enhanced through hard work and learning. Adopting this mindset makes you more open to challenges, embracing the unfamiliar or uncomfortable and willing to experience failure.

However, adopting this growth mindset means we must challenge our limiting self-beliefs that reinforce our fixed mindset. Limiting beliefs is the negative thoughts that hold us back, hindering our journey of self-improvement.

RECOGNISE YOUR FIXED MINDSET. Start to be aware of how your fixed mindset, became your everyday internal dialogue. Fear of failure, procrastination, always being in your comfort zone or being a constant quitter could be why this mindset has been reinforced in your mind.

That being said, you need to start being conscious of what you’re saying to yourself daily. If you struggle with that, try speaking to yourself out loud, as it helps to be more aware of what you’re saying.

REMOVE ANYTHING THAT DOESN’T ALIGN, i’m specifally talking about social media. There are so many self degarding or depreciating content(which are always disgusied as a ‘joke’) and the more you consume it, the more you believe it.

However this can apply to your physical environment as well, such as people, sentimental objects or your actual space.

START TO REDEFINE FAILURE. There are so many ways you can define failure, but my favourite has to be failure is the sacrifice for success. Of course, you can research other ways to redefine it that resonates with you.

However, allow yourself to grieve failures, especially if they had a huge impact on your life. The only way you can apply the lessons from failure in life is to process them.

DO SOMETHING CHALLENGING EACH DAY. Whether it is giving yourself an extra 20 minutes at the gym, or trying to advance yourself in your studies, just do something that pushes you and hopefully, makes you struggle.

Once we allow ourselves to struggle and be challenged, we start to develop the belief that being challenged is okay, not doing it perfect on the first try is okay we can still do tasks without them being perfect + you’re also embracing failure.

APPRECIATE YOUR EFFORT. Something is always better than nothing, not everything that we do has to be perfect to consider ourselves accomplished. Once we acknowledge the value of hard work and see how it impacts our day-to-day life, it enforces the belief that we can expand our skills even just by a little.

The perfect way to appreciate your effort is by celebrating or rewarding yourself. Allow yourself extra screen time, to sleep in, or do any of your favourite ‘unproductive’ activities.

SEEK OUT NEW KNOWLEDGE. Not just reading an article and calling it a day, but actively researching something memorable. This doesn’t have to be a scholarly topic, it could be anything. When we start to desire to learn, which is practically the main thing about a growth mindset, it enforces those beliefs.

BUILD RESILENCE. You’re going to fail, struggle, lose and maybe suffer. While it is important to grieve what happens, you should be able to bounce back after some time. Building this skill is so important in the growth mindset, as it helps you to take control of your emotions and not the other way around.

This applies to constructive criticism as well. People will not always give you praise, but that doesn’t matter, what matters is your ability to act on that criticism. An outside perspective always helps to improve yourself and your abilities.

1K notes · View notes