Another Logic Exercise With Marzi
Claim: during the 19th century, homeowners built in "disappointments rooms" in which to chain up/hide disabled or mentally ill children (or modified existing rooms into such), with special features like metal floors with grates or doors that locked from the outside only
Discussion questions:
Most builders were hired locally back then. Do you think that entire crews of builders constructing or renovating these rooms could have been trusted to keep quiet about their existence?
The original "disappointments room" that went viral online was in the 1857 home of Laurie Dumas, in West Warwick, Rhode Island. It featured a metal floor. Would a child trapped in a room with a metal floor make or less obvious noise than one in a room without? What does this mean for the effectiveness of such a room as a hiding-prison?
Above, but with the fact that the room has exterior windows on the front of the house.
The girl they assumed was locked in there- Ruth Carpenter, who died in 1900 at age 5; no known evidence of disability or mental illness -has a very public grave and was therefore known in the community. Is it likely that a child that people wanted to hide away would be publicly acknowledged?
Laurie Dumas was told about "disappointments rooms" by a random lady at the public library. Is that a reliable source?
Would building a purpose-made room to lock someone away be more or less cost-effective and private than just confining them to an existing room in the house or institutionalizing them?
Is there any other sort of use for an attic room that IS attested at the time? Like, say, a nursery, staff bedroom, storage room (coal or otherwise), etc? Could a given alleged disappointments room be explained by one of those known, documented room types?
And once again: am I believing this because it sounds like a horror movie- there literally is a horror movie about this concept, in fact -and I want to believe it even though it falls apart when one applies logic?
111 notes
·
View notes
as happy n excited as I am about being somewhat known on the internet, I hope (if a little too late) that it never puts anyone off making friends with me ever. I hope I don't come off as intimidating because if anything I'm way more intimidated by you it doesn't even matter who you are. the niche micro internet celebrity is more scared of you than you are of it or something.
91 notes
·
View notes
sometimes I see manga panels or anime screenshots of luffy and zoro being silly and I'm hit with the reminder that zoro not only believes his dream/ambitions mean nothing without luffy but that he's said this out loud. to an enemy, no less, as he chose to exchange his life for luffy's. that luffy himself would lose his absolute shit if something bad ever happened to zoro and the reason why luffy tends to worry less about and rely more on him is bc he knows how strong zoro is, can and will be and the lengths he'd go to protect others, especially the people he cares about, since this part of zoro's character is exactly what ultimately convinced luffy to recruit him in the first place. that even though zoro's the one with the grand gestures it likely means so much to luffy, who experienced tragedy early on and is afraid of losing those he loves to the point he vowed to become strong just to avoid so, the fact that zoro's such a steady presence and force beside him - one he can count on to keep everyone, and luffy too, safe. insane levels of devotion and trust going on between two dudes who shower once a week.
254 notes
·
View notes
I forgive Spencer for pronouncing ASMR As-mer in S14E12. I doubt he’d been to a lecture on ASMR, and we know he wouldn’t have read about it online where he could have heard the pronunciation. So he read it in a book without hearing it and kinda guessed. That’s reasonable. But Garcia?!?!? Chronically online queen?!?!? Girl get up
70 notes
·
View notes
I regret going into the tsats tag because I was hoping to see a bunch of gay nerds nerding out over the Solangelo book, but instead I mainly saw trash takes, hate and blatant misunderstanding of literally everything that happened in the book.
437 notes
·
View notes
it's so hard to put into words my feelings about fhjy like i understand so much of the criticism but recognizing this does not make me angry i have not blorbified the rat grinders or anything it just fills me with a complete and utter sense of apathy about all the characters and the story this season
23 notes
·
View notes
Headcanons about the Black Brothers relationship?
they never were tight-knit, and their relationship was never one of ordinary siblings
regulus was jealous of sirius for always being effortlessly interesting and intriguing, and for stealing his spotlight, although regulus always tried harder and made an effort to be important
sirius, however, resented regulus for not standing up and saying what he believes; to him, that was a sign of weakness, obedience, and agreement towards his parents’ beliefs
(for those that believe that sirius was on the quidditch team, too) the quidditch pitch was where they both took out their anger
(gryffindor-slytherin matches were known to be very competitive, due to their nature. both of them wanted to win; regulus wouldn’t let sirius win in the field where regulus was passionate, and sirius reciprocated the feeling)
they didn’t talk much in grimmauld place; both of them were busy, with work and duties, so they didn’t have the time to talk properly, even if they wanted to
rare were the times in which they talked willingly, and those were at family banquets, often to gossip about their guests; however, most of the time, regulus occupied himself with talking to his guests and to their family, while sirius was doing the same, admittedly less interested into pureblooded conversations and such
despite not being close as children, teenagers or adults, something dimmed in sirius when he heard the news of regulus’ death
72 notes
·
View notes