#Enterprise Security Architecture

[quantumleapblog]

Secure Your Digital Future with Enterprise Security Architecture by Senrysa Technologies

In a rapidly evolving digital world, security is no longer optional—it's a business-critical imperative. As enterprises scale through cloud, IoT, and digital transformation initiatives, the complexity of protecting their IT environments grows exponentially. This is where enterprise security architecture becomes essential.

Senrysa Technologies Ltd., a pioneer in IT and digital transformation, has redefined how businesses safeguard their operations. Their advanced enterprise security architecture solutions are designed not just to defend against threats but to empower sustainable, secure growth.

With a holistic approach grounded in global standards like TOGAF, NIST, and SABSA, Senrysa ensures end-to-end protection—from cloud and hybrid infrastructures to endpoint security and identity access management. Their real-time threat detection and automated response capabilities offer businesses the resilience to withstand today's sophisticated cyberattacks.

But it’s not just about technology. Senrysa’s security framework is built around business continuity, regulatory compliance (GDPR, HIPAA, ISO 27001), and risk management, ensuring that enterprises not only survive but thrive in a challenging cyber landscape.

Whether you operate in banking, healthcare, governance, or retail, Senrysa’s scalable, cost-effective, and future-ready security solutions help you maintain customer trust, safeguard data, and achieve operational excellence.

Cybersecurity isn’t just a defence mechanism anymore—it’s a strategic enabler of growth. Partner with Senrysa Technologies and architect a secure, resilient future for your enterprise.

👉 Learn more: Visit Blog

[jcmarchi]

Open-Source Alternatives Amid Semgrep Licensing Controversy

New Post has been published on https://thedigitalinsider.com/open-source-alternatives-amid-semgrep-licensing-controversy/

Open-Source Alternatives Amid Semgrep Licensing Controversy

The security community witnessed a seismic shift in January 2025, as rival companies united to launch Opengrep—a fork of static application security testing tool, Semgrep. Once celebrated for its community-driven open-source ethos, Semgrep ignited controversy when it altered its licensing model in December 2024. These licensing changes restricted the use of contributed rules in commercial products and shifted key features behind a paywall.

Semgrep became an essential tool for developers worldwide due to its ability to detect vulnerabilities across multiple programming languages. However, the company’s decision risks stifling innovation in an area vital to modern cybersecurity.

Amid the controversy, DevSecOps startup DeepSource launched Globstar, a new open-source toolkit for code security. Built from scratch and released under the MIT license, Globstar says it aims to provide unrestricted commercial and full public access to its code.

“Through Globstar, we are offering a fresh approach to custom static analysis, designed with the needs of security teams in mind. It emerged from an internal framework we had developed for threat detection,” Sanket Saurav, co-founder and CEO of DeepSource, told me. “Semgrep is already in capable hands, and our goal was to take a distinct path. We see ourselves not as a replacement, but an alternative who brings a new perspective to the space.”

The company has raised a total of $7.7M in funding and is currently being backed by Y-Combinator investors.

Developed utilizing the Go programming language and integrated with Tree-sitter, Globstar supports over 20 programming languages. The toolkit features an intuitive YAML interface for creating custom security checkers and an advanced Go interface for complex, cross-file analysis.

“When a project is forked, it often takes a different trajectory—but when constrained to building on top of an existing product, innovation can be limited,” said Sanket. “We created a system that simplifies the process of writing custom code checkers.”

Business Necessity Versus Open-Source Preservation

On Dec. 13, 2024, Semgrep revamped its licensing model to restrict third-party use of contributed rules in competing commercial products without authorization. Moreover, the company rebranded its open-source version to “Semgrep CE” (Community Edition). Semgrep claims that its licensing changes are essential to protect intellectual property and ensure sustainable revenue. The company contends that restricting commercial use helps curb unauthorized repackaging and supports long-term innovation.

“When engineers write code to solve a problem, static analysis examines the code without execution, identifying patterns and potential issues early in the development process. Semgrep is a respected player in this space, and I hold them in high regard,” said Sanket. “However, their shift in licensing for commercial users reflects a broader reality: VC-backed companies must balance open-source principles with sustainable business models.”

He notes that while the change didn’t directly impact end users, it raises an ongoing debate about whether open source should remain entirely unrestricted or evolve to ensure long-term viability.

On January 2025, 10 DevSec firms including Aikido Security, Arnica, Amplify Security, Endor Labs, Jit, Kodem, Legit Security, Mobb and Orca Security—formed a consortium to launch Opengrep. Traditionally fierce competitors, the new consortium directly plans to challenge Semgrep’s decision to limit functionality in favor of commercial gain. In a blog post, Endor Labs stated that static code analysis is “too important to restrict”.

However, it’s not yet clear if Opengrep merely repackages legacy code rather than offering a completely new solution.

The Rise of Open-Source Alternatives 

DeepSource recognized a growing need among developers for a tool that does not inherit legacy constraints. “Enterprise customers don’t want to juggle multiple tools—it creates integration challenges and drives demand for an all-in-one solution,” explained Sanket. “Static analysis plays a crucial role in understanding code architecture, which is why we’ve positioned ourselves as a unified platform.”

However, DeepSource’s Globstar is not alone, several static code analysis alternatives have gained traction following the Semgrep licensing controversy. For instance, SonarQube is a code analysis platform that offers both a free Community Edition and paid versions, for static code analysis, integration support and metrics tracking. Likewise, ShellCheck is another alternative specifically used for analyzing shell scripts, and aids developers in catching scripting errors that could later lead to major bugs or inefficiencies. It flags commands or syntax that may not be portable across different shell environments. Due to its ease of use—ability to run from the command line and easily integrate into CI/CD pipelines, ShellCheck has become an increasingly popular choice.

While Opengrep seeks to preserve a legacy tool’s open roots, other alternatives like SonarQube, Globstar and ShellCheck also offer a fresh, forward-thinking solution. As the open-source debate unfolds, developers and enterprises face pivotal choices that may redefine the landscape of code analysis.

[techcronus]

Node.js Development: Everything You Need to Know in 2025

In 2025, Node.js development continues to be a powerful tool for building efficient, scalable, and real-time applications. This backend JavaScript framework has become a go-to technology for backend development, favoured by developers for its speed, flexibility, and vast ecosystem. Here’s everything you need to know about Node.js development trends, advantages, and key considerations in 2025.

Why Node.js Remains Popular in 2025

Node.js has gained a strong foothold in web and app development due to its high performance and ability to handle large volumes of simultaneous requests, making it ideal for data-intensive applications. Its non-blocking, event-driven architecture allows developers to build scalable web applications that can easily support thousands of concurrent users.

Key Node.js Trends to Watch in 2025

Serverless Architecture: Serverless is growing in popularity, and Node.js serverless applications fit perfectly with this trend. In a serverless environment, developers don’t need to manage server infrastructure; they focus instead on writing code. This approach can reduce development costs and improve scalability, making Node.js a key player in the serverless computing market.

Edge Computing: As demand for faster data processing rises, Node.js for edge computing is becoming crucial. By enabling data processing closer to the data source, Node.js helps reduce latency and improve application performance, particularly in real-time applications.

Microservices Architecture: Microservices are essential for large-scale, modular applications. Node.js, with its lightweight nature, is perfect for Node.js microservices architecture, allowing developers to build small, independent services that can be deployed and scaled individually.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) Integration: In 2025, integrating AI and ML models into applications is a significant trend. Node.js with AI and ML is compatible with powerful machine-learning libraries, making it an attractive choice for developers looking to create intelligent applications.

Benefits of Using Node.js in 2025

High Performance: Node.js uses the V8 engine, offering impressive speed and efficient execution of JavaScript. This makes it suitable for applications requiring fast response times, such as real-time applications, chat applications, and IoT devices.

Rich Ecosystem: The Node.js ecosystem, including npm (Node Package Manager), gives developers access to a wide range of reusable modules and libraries. This Node.js ecosystem reduces development time and helps accelerate project timelines.

Cross-Platform Compatibility: Node.js Development cross-platform applications work well across different platforms, making it easier for developers to build applications that run seamlessly on various operating systems.

Scalability: The non-blocking, asynchronous architecture of Node.js for scalable applications makes it easy to scale horizontally, supporting increased workloads as businesses grow.

Best Practices for Node.js Development in 2025

Leverage TypeScript: Using TypeScript with Node.js enhances code quality and reduces bugs, making it a valuable addition to any development project.

Prioritize Security: Security is a primary concern for developers, particularly in 2025, as cyber threats grow more sophisticated. Implementing Node.js security best practices, like input validation and rate limiting, is essential for protecting applications.

Adopt CI/CD Pipelines: Continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines streamline development and ensure faster, more reliable Node.js deployments.

Conclusion

Node.js continues to be a versatile and high-performance choice for backend development in 2025. Its adaptability to trends like serverless architecture, microservices, and AI integration makes it a prime technology for building future-ready applications. By leveraging the power of Node.js developers, businesses can develop scalable, efficient, and intelligent solutions to stay ahead in the digital landscape.

[rajaniesh]

Implementing Data Mesh on Databricks: Harmonized and Hub & Spoke Approaches

Explore the Harmonized and Hub & Spoke Data Mesh models on Databricks. Enhance data management with autonomous yet integrated domains and central governance. Perfect for diverse organizational needs and scalable solutions. #DataMesh #Databricks

[bivueioluca]

https://justpaste.it/b4afa

Is your current IT infrastructure starting to feel like a pair of outdated shoes? Reliable, sure, but maybe a little worn and hindering your ability to move forward. In today's fast-paced business world, you need agility and flexibility to stay competitive. That's where hybrid cloud infrastructure comes in. 

[lesmana-enterprise-ltd]

WIP | Winsbury Manor, an Ambitious Project of a Tudor Home in Ravenwood (NO CC)

A Historical Residence

Nestled in the hauntingly serene Whispering Glen of Ravenwood, Winsbury Manor stands as a striking relic of a turbulent past. Built in the late 15th century, this Tudor-style estate became the seat of Kingdom of Henford rule over the Kingdom of Ravenwood from 1490 to 1532. Once a symbol of dominance, the manor witnessed grand coronations, fierce battles, and the eventual fall of Henford’s reign to Ravenwood’s relentless resistance.

Our Dedication to Restoration

Since acquiring Winsbury Manor from the esteemed Ravenshade family in 2020, Lesmana Enterprise Co., Ltd. has been steadfast in its dedication to the manor’s meticulous restoration.

Once a crumbling relic of Ravenwood’s storied past, the manor has been carefully preserved and revitalized, blending modern techniques with respect for its rich architectural and historical heritage. Every stone, timber, and mural has been thoughtfully restored to honor the manor's legacy as a seat of power and cultural significance. Now, after years of tireless work, Winsbury Manor is poised to begin a new chapter.

Lesmana Enterprise is proud to announce the manor’s upcoming auction, offering this remarkable piece of history to those who share a passion for preserving the grandeur of Ravenwood’s noble legacy.

Offering to Public Soon

Prepare to be immersed in history as Winsbury Manor, a true masterpiece of heritage restoration, goes to auction. This is your exclusive opportunity to own a landmark that blends timeless grandeur with unparalleled historical significance. Get ready to bid and secure your place in the legacy of Ravenwood’s finest estate.

Secure your spot in our auction for §50,000 and sign up for our upcoming auction via www.LesmanaEnterprise.co.sm/Auction/register.

Special rates are available for Lothario Trust Bank and Landgraab Standard Bank priority status holders.

[darkcollectorruins]

When asked which of his kids he had to be more aware about wreaking chaos, most people assumed Bruce Wayne would say Jason or maybe Damian. 

But the truth is, Bruce would say Tim without batting an eye. 

A bored Tim Drake was a danger on itself. He could hack the whole nation security system just to prove the government was doing a shit job at protecting data.

The last time he volunteered to design the architectural project for a Wayne Enterprises development, they ended up with a ziggurat in the middle of London, because “it was funny feeding the theories that they were illuminati” (how he even got the permit for that and the whole thing done within a year is still a mystery to Bruce).

That being said, a motivated Tim Drake is even worse. A motivated Tim Drake will follow a group of vigilantes around town, find out their identities and the next thing you know, he’s Robin. 

He will bankrupt an entire family company because the son thought it was funny to bully Damian. The new vigilante from JL who made a joke about the late Robin’s death? Got assigned the worst missions for years (he wanted to kick him out but Diana stopped him, also he’s not even in the JL how did he do that?). The nepo baby actress who harassed Dick at the latest gala? Career ruined. And the list goes on and on.

So, yeah, Tim can be trouble. 

[phantomtoff]

A Very Informant Post About The Sarkyn

Hi Everyone! Here is a very long post about my Sarkyn creatures. I hope you like it or enjoy reading it. :D

The Sarkyn are a sentient Shark/piranha/betta fish-like species, who inhabit the South coastlines on Mudos as well in the ocean near the south. While the South coastline holds one of their largest coastal cities, it became one of the leading business hubs for resorts and ocean ports on the surface, while their oldest capital is deep under the sea.

Their role in industrial society is more of a organized crime syndicate that is split into three categories.

Drug Peddlers

Loan Sharks

 Corruption Bribing

The two notable cities from land and Sea:

Imaim (Surface City of Southern Mudos)Imaim is a relatively new metropolis boasting a dazzling skyline and breathtaking ocean views. It serves as a gateway for ambitious Sarkyn seeking to establish themselves, build business connections, or immerse themselves in the city’s vibrant nightlife. Known for its entertainment industry and luxury hotels, Imaim thrives as a premier tourist destination. Beyond its allure as a playground for the wealthy, the city also houses Mudos' largest ocean port, making it a crucial hub for trade and commerce.

Sitnalta (Underwater Capital)One of the oldest and most enigmatic cities in Sarkyn history, Sitnalta’s past is shrouded in mystery, with records suggesting it was destroyed or lost through time. Now, it stands as the stronghold of the old money elite, home to the four most powerful crime families beneath the sea. These families wield immense influence, manipulating political and economic affairs from the depths, ensuring their grip extends far beyond the ocean floor.

Culture

Sarkyn culture resembles Earth’s Spartan/Roman in a military hierarchy sense. apparel, and architecture seem to resemble Earth's 1920s-1940s Art Deco. (Examples: Think Gotham city but underwater or Rapture from Bioshock.)

Relationship Dynamics

Glukkon

Trade Partners: The Sarkyn provides rare minerals extracted from coastal and underwater environments in exchange for advanced weaponry and machinery, fostering a mutually beneficial trade network.

Mercenary Contracts: As enforcers and private contractors, Sarkyn offer protection to Glukkon enterprises operating near the coast. Their presence is particularly valuable for securing massive fishing vessels and repelling non-faction pirate raids.

Cultural Exchange: While the Glukkon respect the Sarkyn’s industrial and military capabilities, the Sarkyn, in turn, admire the Glukkon’s ruthless business acumen. This dynamic creates a pragmatic but occasionally uneasy partnership.

Vykker

Experimental Allies: The Vykkers regard the Sarkyn as ideal test subjects for cutting-edge biological and technological experimentation. In return, the Sarkyn gain enhancements that amplify their combat prowess.

Tech Suppliers: The Vykkers supply state-of-the-art bio-modifications and weaponry, further augmenting the Sarkyn’s military strength and industrial efficiency.

Tense Cooperation: Despite their shared interests, tensions persist. The Vykkers’ disregard for Sarkyn life clashes with the Sarkyn’s deep-seated pride, making their alliance one of wary necessity rather than genuine trust.

Oktigi

Knowledge Brokers: The Oktigi provide intelligence networks that assist the Sarkyn in navigating political and territorial conflicts, making them invaluable allies in espionage and subterfuge.

Economic Symbiosis: Sarkyn smuggling operations and underworld connections serve as ideal conduits for discreetly transporting illicit Oktigi goods, reinforcing their mutual economic interests.

Shared Vanity: Both species share a deep appreciation for status, luxury, and aesthetics. This cultural alignment fosters a natural camaraderie, strengthening their alliance beyond mere business dealings.

Assumptions and Social Dynamics

Reputation: Among industrialist species on Oddworld, the Sarkyn are widely regarded as a dangerous force best left undisturbed. However, with the right negotiations and a sufficient price, they can be valuable and reliable allies.

Stereotypes: Common perceptions of the Sarkyn paint them as treacherous, unnervingly tall, and ruthlessly violent—earning them monikers such as Backstabbing Sharks, Freakishly Tall Fish, and Brutal and Bloodthirsty.

Debt of Loyalty and Internal Conflict

Fealty and Division: A Sarkyn who forges an alliance with a surface-dwelling industrialist—whether a Glukkon, an Oktigi, or another faction—may be expected to pledge loyalty to their partner’s enterprise, much as they would in a traditional Sarkyn union. However, such affiliations disrupt the established hierarchy, as they enable individuals to gain status through external alliances rather than through traditional means. This phenomenon breeds tension within Sarkyn society.

Rivalry and Resentment: Those who ascend the social ladder through partnerships with industrialist species may face envy and hostility from their fellow Sarkyn. Many perceive this form of advancement as an affront to those who remain at the lower rungs of society, exacerbating internal divides and fueling political intrigue, betrayal, and power struggles.

Appearance/Anatomy

Dietary Needs and Habits: Sarkyn are strictly carnivorous, they are no strangers to cannibalism, though this behavior is typically reserved for extreme circumstances or as a last resort.

Life Span: Sarkyn can live up to 70-80 years.

Genetics and Reproduction: Sarkyn reproduction follows a process similar to that of cartilaginous fish, such as sharks. Males possess a pair of claspers—specialized, grooved copulatory organs derived from pelvic fins. During copulation, the male inserts one of his claspers into the female’s cloaca, where it expands like an umbrella to anchor itself securely. The clasper's internal structure contains a cartilaginous rod that stiffens during mating, facilitating sperm transfer. Additionally, some Sarkyn males may secrete a mucus-like substance to enhance sperm motility and improve fertilization success.

As an ovoviviparous species, female Sarkyn incubate fertilized embryos internally, providing them with nutrients through a yolk sac rather than a placental connection. After a gestation period (likely varying depending on environmental factors), the female gives birth to live offspring, known as pups

Appearance

The average height for a Sarkyn is 335.28 cm or 11’0 ft

They have double eyelids.

Male Sarkyn exhibit a range of body types, from lean and athletic to bulky and heavily built. They possess a distinctive underbite, where the lower jaw extends beyond the upper jaw. Their cranial fins are relatively short, but they feature elongated, prominent fins extending from their brow region, resembling eyebrow-like appendages.

Female Sarkyn, in contrast, are generally more slender than their male counterparts. Unlike males, they possess an overbite, with the upper jaw extending past the lower jaw. Additionally, they lack the elongated eyebrow fins seen in males. Instead, the fin atop their heads varies in length and shape, often stylized to reflect personal or cultural preferences. Sarkyn women don’t naturally have breasts—they’re a cosmetic body modification achieved through surgery, hence why they don’t have nipples.

Both male and female can unhinge their jaws with the slit on their lower jaws can pull apart to become wider, they have sharp fangs like teeth to easily grapple prey.

[mariacallous]

Implementation of week two of the Israel-Hamas cease-fire deal has gone according to plan, more or less. But anyone who seriously believes that there’s smooth sailing ahead for the three-phased accord should lay down and wait quietly until the feeling passes.

This isn’t an agreement between the United States and Switzerland. It’s the grudging result of 15 months of bitter, bloody conflict between two combatants seemingly pledged to the other’s destruction. One of those parties—Hamas—engaged in the willful and indiscriminate killing of civilians; serial sexual violence; the taking of hostages; and is designated by the agreement’s principal mediator as a foreign terror organization. The other—Israel, led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, whose overriding goal is to stay in power—would prefer the war in Gaza continue, and thus is in no hurry to reach the agreement’s second stage, which imagines the end of the war and the withdrawal of Israeli forces.

The implementation process is literally week by week, and much might disrupt it. That said, perhaps the most likely outcome will be the successful completion of the first phase, with its exchange of hostages for Palestinian prisoners. The agreement compels both parties to respect the cease-fire so long as negotiations on the second phase continue. And few will be surprised if both sides drag these on well beyond the initial six weeks designated for the first phase. Indeed, the negotiators’ logic is that after six weeks of quiet, both sides, perhaps under public pressure, will find it much harder to return to battle. Hovering over this unwieldy enterprise is newly minted U.S. President Donald Trump who, having claimed credit for the accord’s success, now owns it. It remains to be seen just how much currency he’s prepared to spend to keep it alive and how concerned he is about the real possibility that his first preinaugural foreign-policy success might crater on his watch.

Phased deals are always inherently risky, especially between two parties who view their conflict in near existential terms. It would have seemed much simpler to implement an all-for-all negotiation, speeding up the timeline with Israel getting all the hostages back in exchange for the release of thousands of Palestinian prisoners and the end of the war in Gaza. But, then again, this is the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, where anything remotely resembling comprehensive trade-offs goes beyond what either party is prepared to concede. This is especially true on the Israeli side, where domestic politics dominates decision-making and produces risk-aversion, not risk-readiness, particularly when it concerns territory.

The prime example of a phased, conditions-based performance agreement was the Oslo Accords. And those failed, largely because there was no clear-cut end state, and, instead of generating trust and confidence, the gradualist approach created resentment and lack of trust. And if Oslo—which was a genuine breakthrough, complete with signing ceremonies, talk of actual peace, and real respect (even affection) between the negotiators—still failed, one can imagine the challenges to an Israeli-Hamas accord.

The thornier questions are saved for the second phase, which, at its core, will require a vision for the end of the war and Gaza’s future. At present, the two sides have irreconcilable visions for Gaza’s future, with Hamas determined to stay in power and Israel determined to prevent that outcome. Phase two envisions Israeli withdrawal from Gaza, which is difficult to imagine without a robust security architecture and guarantees—which Hamas will work hard to reject. Negotiations in the second phase will also require addressing questions of a political day after in Gaza, which will almost certainly involve some role for the Palestinian Authority (PA), something Netanyahu has adamantly opposed. Phase two depends on agreement from both sides over Gaza’s future: who is in charge politically, what the security architecture looks like, and monitoring of the enclave. At present, these questions seem insurmountable.

Perhaps a different Israeli prime minister—one who is free from the all-consuming need to stay in power and without the threat of being on trial for bribery, fraud, and breach of trust—might have been able to take on an all-for-all approach. But the political laws of gravity that have governed Israel’s negotiating style—need for performance-based implementation, fundamental mistrust of Hamas, and concerns over withdrawal from Gaza that could bring Hamas’s resurgence—would have been more likely pushed in the direction of a phased agreement.

The challenge of phasing is made worse by the Hamas factor, which has shaped Israel’s view of the conflict and now looms over the agreement’s implementation. The Israel-Hamas agreement clearly reflects the hollowness of Netanyahu’s claim of total victory over the group. Hamas has clearly been dealt a mighty blow. Its senior leadership has been killed; its capacity as an organized military force capable of another attack on the level of Oct. 7, 2023, destroyed; its allies (save the Houthis), Hezbollah and Iran, severely weakened. It seems unlikely, even if it wanted to (and it may not), that Hamas can return to governing Gaza as it did between 2007 and 2023. Its popularity has declined among Palestinians in Gaza who wonder what Oct. 7 achieved, other than death and destruction, as well as what Hamas will be able to do to alleviate their suffering and rebuild their homes and lives. And yet, Hamas survives. The cease-fire has enabled it to emerge above ground, bold and brazen, sending its police to maintain order, staffing its ministries, paying salaries, restoring services, and distributing humanitarian assistance. Indeed, recent reporting suggests that, however weakened, Hamas remains “deeply entrenched,” and its hold on power will create challenges for any permanent cease-fire.

At a minimum, should the cease-fire collapse, Hamas will remain an insurgency capable of inflicting casualties on returning Israeli forces. Indeed, former U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said during a recent speech that Hamas has already recruited nearly as many fighters as Israel has taken off the battlefield. And if the cease-fire holds, Hamas plans to wield significant influence in Gaza’s proverbial day after. Given the dysfunction of the Palestinian national movement; the weakness of the corrupt, nepotistic, and authoritarian Mahmoud Abbas-led PA; and the Israeli government’s seeming refusal to engage in post-war planning that might actually empower a new legitimate Palestinian governing structure, Hamas will likely rule by default.

With both Israel and the PA blocking serious post-war planning for Gaza, the Israel-Hamas agreement might actually empower Hamas, facilitating the release of almost 2,000 Palestinian prisoners and ensuring a surge of humanitarian assistance for the first time in 15 months at pre-war levels. Hamas’s visibility on the streets of Gaza will also continue to harden Israeli government positions on getting to a second phase. As Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar asserted last week, the current deal is only for a temporary cease-fire; any permanent end to the war would depend on eliminating any Hamas role and influence in Gaza.

Henry Kissinger once quipped that Israel had no foreign policy, just domestic politics. An exaggeration to be sure, but when applied to the way Netanyahu has handled the post Oct. 7 Israel-Hamas conflict, there is no better analysis. All leaders of democratic societies keep an eye on the rear-view mirror, looking to see where their domestic supporters and opponents are trending. But Netanyahu’s circumstances are unique. On trial for bribery, fraud, and breach of trust for four years running, his political career and potentially his physical freedom compel him to retain power and find some way to beat or undermine his indictment and trial. That means remaining in power, which in turn depends on the support of his right-wing coalition, including two extremist parties—one of which has already withdrawn from the government in protest over the cease-fire deal, and the other threatening to withdraw at the end of the first phase if Netanyahu doesn’t resume the war.

Netanyahu has bribed and pacified these ministers and other coalition members with various benefits: for the religious parties, subsidies for their religious seminaries and legislation to allow them to avoid military duty; and for former National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich settlements, land confiscation and policies that can lay the basis for annexation of the West Bank in everything but name. But, to be clear, like the radical Ben-Gvir and Smotrich, Netanyahu also doesn’t want the war to end completely either. The prime minister fears that if the shooting stops, the focus will turn to his role in the Oct. 7 catastrophe. Indeed, he has done everything in his power to block the formation of a state commission of inquiry and to undermine, if not dislodge, those intelligence and security officials who oppose his wartime policies. There is no obstacle on the Israeli side greater than Netanyahu’s obsession with staying in power and the necessity of catering to his extremist ministers. That dynamic almost certainly prevented a hostage and cease-fire deal from being signed months ago, has constrained the delivery of humanitarian assistance to Gaza, and prevented any serious discussion of post-conflict day-after arrangements in Gaza, especially with regard to a role for the PA. And it has led to a toughening of Israeli policy toward Palestinians on the West Bank and the enabling of settler violence and intimidation there.

Indeed, the recent large-scale operation in Jenin, which might expand to a larger area of the northern West Bank, is partly related to the need to placate members of Netanyahu’s right-wing coalition, who opposed the hostage deal but have declared Trump’s electoral victory as an opportunity to “apply Israeli sovereignty” in the West Bank. A serious explosion in the West Bank has the potential to derail the deal from both sides, creating yet another obstacle to phase two of the deal. As the deal’s implementation moves forward, Israeli politics— particularly pressure from the right to resume the war—will increase. And it is difficult to see how Israel will move from phase one to two with this government. The opposition has offered Netanyahu a safety net to implement the full deal should his coalition break. But this would be a risky move for a prime minister who would then be dependent on adversaries whom he knows would love to see his back.

By all accounts, there’s little doubt that Trump and his Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff played important roles in pressuring both Hamas and Netanyahu, particularly the latter, to accept the agreement. Inauguration Day in the United States and the looming transition from a presidential administration that had no leverage to an incoming one that held important cards, clearly had an impact on Netanyahu, who seemed willing to give Trump a preinaugural win. Whether and how Trump may have sweetened the plot for Netanyahu is unclear. There’s reportedly a letter that contains U.S. assurances that if Hamas fails to hold up its end of the deal, Israel is free to resume the war. In any case, Trump’s unpredictability and clear messaging that he wanted the deal done before he assumed office signaled to Netanyahu that Trump didn’t want Israel to become a problem this early in his second term. And Netanyahu, who’s not quite sure where he stands with Trump and whether he can say no to him the way he rebuffed former U.S. President Joe Biden for months without serious cost, got the message.

Going forward, Trump’s relationship to the agreement has much to do with his broader goals in the region. Much has been made of his interest in broadening the Abraham Accords to include Israeli-Saudi normalization, and even more of the fact that he wants a Nobel Peace Prize. If he’s serious about an Israeli-Saudi deal, all roads will almost certainly lead back to Gaza and well beyond, as the Saudis press Trump and Netanyahu for a commitment to a political horizon involving some sort of two-state solution. This, of course, would set up the possibility of a clash with Netanyahu if the Saudis and Trump demand more of him on the Palestinian issue than his politics will allow.

But that’s a matter for another day. The question now is how much does Trump care about the cease-fire deal and what is he prepared to do to help implement it. Witkoff has been quite expansive in asserting an active U.S. role going forward and is planning a trip to Gaza and the region. Trump, on the other hand, has been decidedly more risk-averse. When asked about implementation recently, Trump responded, “It’s not our war. It’s their war. I am not confident.” Trump can always walk away and blame the collapse on Hamas, and, if necessary, on Israel. And let’s be crystal clear: Trump has a huge agenda, and it’s doubtful that this issue is at the top of his list. Nonetheless, like it or not, the Israel-Hamas deal may well be Trump’s first foreign-policy test. And as a self-proclaimed peacemaker and the world’s greatest negotiator, he doesn’t like to fail.

Can he save the deal if it’s on the cusp of cratering? Can he pressure Netanyahu and Hamas to bend to his will? It’s doubtful that Trump, who fashions himself as the most pro-Israeli president in history, would draw on the levers Biden refused to use in pressuring Netanyahu: restricting U.S. military assistance, criticizing Israel in international fora, or unilaterally recognizing Palestinian statehood. And it may well be that Trump’s bluster is stronger than his bite. But Netanyahu is clearly on edge because of Trump’s unpredictability and clearly doesn’t want to put himself on Trump’s bad side. Unlike with Biden, Netanyahu knows there’s no Republican Party to which he can appeal. Trump is the party now. So a decision point may well be coming. Can Trump succeed in pushing Netanyahu to a second phase, or will he be dragged like Biden into the never-ending labyrinth of Israel-Hamas negotiations? In a matter of weeks, or perhaps sooner, we’re going to find out.

[vilevexedvixen]

AU Edward Nygma

@dariusblake and I are actually still on the fence about how to take his character.

Personally, I'd have him be the healthiest mentally and generally. Initially becoming a teacher, specifically to be the supportive figure he needed as a kid (being smart and combative, questioning everything no one wanted questioned, generally put down and held back). Although he was technically just a maths teacher, he managed to apply his subject in a way that meant he effectively taught his students the entire curriculum through a mathematical lens (art, architecture, biology, chemistry, physics, etc.). Encouraging his students to question everything, particularly everything taught in the standard curriculum.

I think this version of Ed would really not stand children, despite being a teacher (the same was true for all my best teachers). His initial attempt at going straight by trying to be that supportive figure and change things from the inside on a small scale would be somewhat self-indulgent (to fulfill his own personal need for a supportive figure retroactively and to show off his superior intellect in a way that is relatively socially acceptable) and something he would later consider foolish and naïve once he does start trying to disrupt the corporate and state powers that dictate the education system and society at large.

Unfortunately, eventually Ed gets fired a. For diverting wildly from the curriculum (even if it lead to students attaining a better understanding of each subject much earlier than expected) and b. For attempting to out the headmaster as a nonce. He was already very much aware that being the healthy supportive figure he needed to others wouldn't help the wider structural issues that lead to people being taught not to think and keep their head down. This Ed still has an ego of course, but is much more secure in his own intelligence and feels less of a need to prove it to others as it is clearly self-evident. No, his riddles are less to prove his intellect over others and rather to make people think. He wants them to be engaged with and becomes more brazen with his presentation to force them into the spotlight. Less to show off (though that too) and more to force everyone to face the questions they otherwise don't think about.

Around the time Ed appears in the story, he's investigating the very same corruption that Bruce is (new to being Batman and recently returned to any involvement in Wayne Enterprises, so has a lot of dirty laundry to sort) and they end up crossing paths (both as investigators and with Ed targeting Bruce himself regarding Wayne Enterprises corruption). Initially, his riddles are a way to keep his old students informed about what's actually going on in Gotham while remaining under the radar. I also feel like he'd plant some riddles unrelated to that info that instead lead to a prize or something to throw off anyone who might also figure them out.

[quantumleapblog]

How a Retail Technology Company is Transforming In-Store and Online Shopping Experiences

Today’s retail environment demands seamless integration between online and offline channels—and that’s where a retail technology company plays a game-changing role. By offering innovations like AI-driven recommendations, real-time inventory tracking, and smart checkout systems, these companies help retailers enhance both in-store and digital shopping experiences. The result? Happier customers, increased sales, and smarter operations. Whether you're a startup or a large enterprise, partnering with the right retail technology company can accelerate your journey toward digital transformation in the retail world.

[rajaniesh]

Unlock Data Governance: Revolutionary Table-Level Access in Modern Platforms

Dive into our latest blog on mastering data governance with Microsoft Fabric & Databricks. Discover key strategies for robust table-level access control and secure your enterprise's data. A must-read for IT pros! #DataGovernance #Security

[bivueioluca]

Pros and Cons of Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) in Cloud Computing - Here are the various advantages and challenges of IaaS that you should know about before using the service model.

[niotechone]

Cloud Computing: Definition, Benefits, Types, and Real-World Applications

In the fast-changing digital world, companies require software that matches their specific ways of working, aims and what their customers require. That’s when you need custom software development services. Custom software is made just for your organization, so it is more flexible, scalable and efficient than generic software.

What does Custom Software Development mean?

Custom software development means making, deploying and maintaining software that is tailored to a specific user, company or task. It designs custom Software Development Services: Solutions Made Just for Your Business to meet specific business needs, which off-the-shelf software usually cannot do.

The main advantages of custom software development are listed below.

1. Personalized Fit

Custom software is built to address the specific needs of your business. Everything is designed to fit your workflow, whether you need it for customers, internal tasks or industry-specific functions.

2. Scalability

When your business expands, your software can also expand. You can add more features, users and integrations as needed without being bound by strict licensing rules.

3. Increased Efficiency

Use tools that are designed to work well with your processes. Custom software usually automates tasks, cuts down on repetition and helps people work more efficiently.

4. Better Integration

Many companies rely on different tools and platforms. You can have custom software made to work smoothly with your CRMs, ERPs and third-party APIs.

5. Improved Security

You can set up security measures more effectively in a custom solution. It is particularly important for industries that handle confidential information, such as finance, healthcare or legal services.

Types of Custom Software Solutions That Are Popular

CRM Systems

Inventory and Order Management

Custom-made ERP Solutions

Mobile and Web Apps

eCommerce Platforms

AI and Data Analytics Tools

SaaS Products

The Process of Custom Development

Requirement Analysis

Being aware of your business goals, what users require and the difficulties you face in running the business.

Design & Architecture

Designing a software architecture that can grow, is safe and fits your requirements.

Development & Testing

Writing code that is easy to maintain and testing for errors, speed and compatibility.

Deployment and Support

Making the software available and offering support and updates over time.

What Makes Niotechone a Good Choice?

Our team at Niotechone focuses on providing custom software that helps businesses grow. Our team of experts works with you throughout the process, from the initial idea to the final deployment, to make sure the product is what you require.

Successful experience in various industries

Agile development is the process used.

Support after the launch and options for scaling

Affordable rates and different ways to work together

Final Thoughts

Creating custom software is not only about making an app; it’s about building a tool that helps your business grow. A customized solution can give you the advantage you require in the busy digital market, no matter if you are a startup or an enterprise.

[dgqex]

DGQEX Focuses on the Trend of Crypto Asset Accounting, Supporting Corporate Accounts to Hold Bitcoin

Recently, UK-listed company Vinanz purchased 16.9 bitcoins at an average price of $103,341, with a total value of approximately $1.75 million. This transaction represents another landmark event in the field of crypto assets. Not only does it mark the first time a traditional enterprise has incorporated bitcoin into its balance sheet, but it also highlights the evolving role of crypto assets within the global financial system. Against this backdrop, DGQEX, as a technology-driven digital currency exchange, is increasingly recognized by institutional investors for its service capabilities and technological innovation.

Institutional Adoption Drives Diversified Crypto Asset Allocation

The Vinanz bitcoin acquisition is not an isolated case. Recently, multiple multinational corporations and institutional investors have begun to include bitcoin in their portfolios. For example, a North American technology giant disclosed bitcoin holdings in its financial reports, while some sovereign wealth funds are reportedly exploring crypto asset allocation strategies. This trend reflects the growing recognition by the traditional financial sector of the anti-inflation and decentralized characteristics of crypto assets. DGQEX, by offering multi-currency trading pairs and deep liquidity, has already provided customized trading solutions for numerous institutional investors. Its proprietary smart matching engine supports high-concurrency trading demands, ensuring institutions can efficiently execute large orders in volatile markets and avoid price slippage due to insufficient liquidity.

Technological Strength Fortifies Institutional Trading Security

With the influx of institutional funds, the security and compliance of crypto asset trading have become central concerns. David Lenigas, Chairman of Vinanz, has explicitly stated that bitcoin holdings will serve as the foundation for the company core business value, reflecting institutional confidence in the long-term value of crypto assets. However, institutional investors now place higher demands on the technical capabilities of trading platforms. DGQEX has built a multi-layered security system through multi-signature wallets, cold storage isolation technology, and real-time risk monitoring systems. In addition, the distributed architecture of DGQEX can withstand high-concurrency trading pressures, ensuring stable operations even under extreme market conditions. These technological advantages provide institutional investors with a reliable trading environment, allowing them to focus on asset allocation strategies rather than technical risks.

Global Expansion Facilitates Cross-Border Asset Allocation for Institutions

The Vinanz bitcoin purchase is seen as a key milestone in the institutionalization of the crypto market. As institutional interest in crypto assets rises globally, demand for cross-border asset allocation has significantly increased. DGQEX has established compliant nodes in multiple locations worldwide, supports multilingual services and localized payment methods, and provides institutional investors with a low-latency, high-liquidity trading environment. Its smart routing system automatically matches optimal trading paths, reducing cross-border transaction costs. Moreover, the DGQEX API interface supports quantitative trading strategies, meeting institutional needs for high-frequency and algorithmic trading, and helping institutions achieve asset appreciation in complex market environments.

DGQEX: Empowering Crypto Asset Allocation with Technology and Service

As an innovation-driven digital currency exchange, DGQEX is committed to providing institutional investors with a secure and convenient trading environment. The platform employs distributed architecture and multiple encryption technologies to ensure user asset security. Its smart routing system and deep liquidity pools deliver low-slippage, high-efficiency execution for large trades. Furthermore, the compliance team of DGQEX continuously monitors global regulatory developments to ensure platform operations adhere to the latest regulatory requirements, providing institutional investors with compliance assurance.

Currently, the crypto asset market is undergoing a transformation from individual investment to institutional allocation. Leveraging its technological strength and global presence, DGQEX offers institutional investors one-stop digital asset solutions. Whether it is multi-currency trading, block trade matching, or customized risk management tools, DGQEX can meet the diverse needs of institutions in crypto asset allocation. Looking ahead, as more traditional institutions enter the crypto market, DGQEX will continue to optimize its services and help global users seize opportunities in the digital asset space.