Sophie is Korean!
Things to keep in mind
———
Yay! Sophie Baek is finally here and with all of excitement of this casting, I think it’s also important to bring attention to the new intersectionality that comes with the character of Sophie (specifically show Sophie).
Why should you take my words into account? Well, as an Asian woman in society today, I feel that I am qualified to speak on this topic since I’ve experienced all of this.
All of my words come from kind intentions, and I purely just want to communicate to the fandom how to approach Sophie being Asian in a respectful way.
Asia is a gigantic continent filled with various countries that have a multitude of cultures and ethnicities. While on the surface they all seem similar, they each have their own customs and traditions that have meaning within our culture. Do not combine them.
It’s important to remember that not every Asian person is Chinese, Japanese or Korean (East asian).
With Sophie being Korean, please do not generalize when writing about what you think you know about Korean culture.
You like Kpop and Kdrama? Great! BUT that does not define what Korean culture is and you shouldn't use that content as a reference.
When writing, be aware of explicit and unconscious biases you have about Asian people.
Asian stereotypes (Model Minority, Dragon Lady, Lotus blossom, etc) are very harmful and spread false narratives about us. Stereotypes eliminate the dimensions of who we are as Asians (South, South East, East, North, West).
Please, please, please do not fetishize. Especially since Bridgerton is a romance series it's extremely important to be mindful of the scenarios you put in your fics.
This also includes the White Savior Complex we see a lot in media!
If you’re writing about something specific, research it and fully understand the content you are putting into your work. Feel a little iffy about if you should put it in your fic? Probably don’t then. It’s that easy!
It's always great to ask someone who is a part of the community as well to see if what you're writing about is appropriate or potentially offensive in any way.
Describing Sophie is something new as well. Be mindful on how you describe her and other Asian characters.
Let me be clear: descriptions like 'slanted eyes' or 'yellow skin' are harmful
Here are some great resources that go into further detail about specific things! Rather than me paraphrasing their words it's best to link the direct source. Even as a part of this community, these articles were a reminder of how I must keep myself in check as well!
Describing Asian Eyes
Some important tips on making/writing Asian OCs
writing east asian characters
The Depiction of Asian Characters - Book Edition
The Dragon Lady, the Lotus Blossom, and the Robot: Archetypes of Asian Women in Western Media
To wrap this up, I want to be clear that I’m not a professional on this topic, but as someone who has been affected by harmful portrayals in media, I feel compelled to share my perspective. My hope is to spread awareness and encourage others to be mindful of how they approach these subjects, especially if they may not be fully informed. It’s about showing respect, doing the necessary research, and recognizing the impact our words and content can have on real people and cultures. By staying educated and considerate, we can be more aware and thoughtful in our actions.
251 notes
·
View notes
Made this as an appreciation to the creativity of this amazing fandom aswell as some friends! I love all of these ocs designs and I've been waiting for an excuse to draw alot of them.. I love this fandom the hyperfixation is real and qhat better way to express my love for it for cramming 13 different full body rendered ocs in one drawing?!??!
I'm normal..
There are so many ocs in this drawing I legit will have to make a separate post for the singles .. (oc credits under cut)
Oc credits!!:
@speedyeatsdirt speedy (middle front row, blue robot)
@burrotello bumper (far right 2nd row, red band master)
@sm-baby able (far right front row, deck of cards)
@mea-art (far left 3rd row, blue balloon dog)
@mix-art (far left front row, blue, yellow, and pink balls)
@jamismejamiam fibula (left back row, colorful ball)
@onixaart xion (middle 2nd row, blue angel rings)
@skittikyu stiltikyu (far left back row, tall green haired)
@summeryseaserpent muna (right front row, small green cat)
@gravphobia pyn (far left 2nd row, gumball machine)
@rabid-mercenary15 erubus (right third row, orange and yellow bat)
@meat-pvppet (far right back row, pink, yellow, and blue puppet)
Aswell as another friend who is offsite! Kosen (right back row, blue fire ghost)
(If u don't see ur ocs single it will be in the next upload- dhegyeye)
(If any of these are wrong I will explode, pity the horrendous oc descriptions hfgdh)
340 notes
·
View notes
Here's Ableist AspenFrostEN Trying To Pack as Much Misinformation and Ableism As She Can Into One Minute:
This sentence is, perhaps, the one and only true thing in this entire video.
Oh, please do enlighten me, Aspen!
I mean, sure, created systems are a thing. Tulpas are the main example of this and the ones that have been studied the most. But there are created systems that aren't tulpas, such as in daemonism.
Also, plenty of traumagenic DID systems have intentionally created alters too, so it's weird to make "people who believe that you can force yourself to have alters" an endogenic system thing.
ALSO, basically no tulpagenic system I know actually uses the word "alter" to describe their headmates.
While most endogenic systems are plural without a disorder, it's bizarre to use this as your definition instead of just "an endogenic systems is plural without trauma" as it's actually defined.
Founded entirely on Tumblr???
Aspen, dear...
Are you... capable of reading? Here's the paragraphs you're looking at. Notice how it says natural system predated the word endogenic?
Yes, the word endogenic was first used on Tumblr... as a replacement of "natural system" or "natural multiple" that dated back to the 90s, before you were even born!
Here's one site mentioning natural multiples in their glossary in 2003:
And here's the origin in a page dated for 1998:
You clearly know NOTHING about the plural history that you're rambling on about.
And how am I only 20 second into this???
What do you consider a medical consensus again?
The World Health Organization's ICD-11, the diagnostic handbook used around the world, explicitly states that you can experience multiple "distinct personality states," the characterizing feature of DID according to it, without having a mental disorder:
That's the World Health Organization's official handbook!!!
I'm not sure what more of a consensus you need.
But I'll add that Tulpamancy is acknowledged as a real psychological phenomenon by Dr. Samuel Veissiere, psychiatry professor at McGill University.
And Dr Eric Yarbough, Distinguished Fellow of the American Psychiatric Association has stated that you can be plural without trauma or a disorder in a book reviewed and published by the American Psychiatric Association.
And these claims are undisputed. There is no peer reviewed paper by any psychiatrist that has claimed you need trauma or a mental disorder to be plural.
Now, onto the next round of misinformation!
I recognize that page! That's DID-research! A glorified blog that convinced an entire generation that OSDD-1a and OSDD-1b were actual medical terms for disorders they could be diagnosed with!
(Spoiler: The aren't!)
Is that so?
It would probably be really inconvenient for this narrative if the creators of the theory of structural dissociation ALSO have said it may be possible people to form self-conscious dissociative parts of the personality without trauma, huh?
I mean, something like that would just completely destroy everything you're trying to sell and make you look even more like a hack who has no idea what she's talking about, wouldn't it?
...
...
...
This paper is by two of the authors of the Haunted Self, which I probably shouldn't need to tell you since you're so knowledgeable about plurality, is the book that created the theory of structural dissociation of the personality.
Even the creators of the theory you're citing are saying plurality could have other causes.
Wouldn't that require you to actually know what endogenic systems actually believe? Or, you know, literally anything about plural history? Or anything at all? 🤔
Now we're back to ableist Aspen having no idea what Schizophrenia is and using it as an insult. 🙄
Aspen is not hiding her intent. Her goal is to spread hate, to come into our communities and bully us.
Aspen is a liar, a bully and an abuser.
But I hope I've also demonstrated pretty thoroughly that on top of that, she also incredibly ignorant.
She's ignorant of psychiatry. She's ignorant of plural history.
Every word out of her mouth on this topic is a lie she made up, and hopes her followers will be gullible enough to swallow, because while she may act confident in her misinformation, the fact is that she doesn't know anything about what she's talking about.
222 notes
·
View notes