#Real-time data access

[pridestudio]

Versatile Software Solution for Efficient Organization Management

PrideStudio is a versatile software solution designed for various organizations, boasting a user-friendly interface and robust data recovery tools. With over 20,000 global users across 100+ industries, it offers strategic KPI visualization dashboards and real-time data access. Key features include automation of departmental activities, enhanced workflow transparency, and electronic data security. The software's customization options, integration capabilities, and notification systems make it a reliable choice for businesses seeking efficiency and accountability.

For more Information visit: PrideStudio (pridesys.com)

Contact us:

E-mail: info@pridesys.com;

Phone: +8801550000003-8, 01550000035

[tebsolutions]

Benefits of Implementing Enterprise Mobility Solutions in Your Business

In today's fast-paced business environment, staying competitive and efficient is crucial. One way to achieve this is by implementing Enterprise Mobility Solutions (EMS) in your organization. EMS refers to the use of mobile technology to streamline business processes, improve productivity, and enhance communication. In this blog, we will explore the numerous benefits that come with integrating Enterprise Mobility Solutions into your business operations.

Key Benefits of Enterprise Mobility Solutions

1. Enhanced Productivity

Enterprise Mobility Solutions enable your employees to work from anywhere at any time. This flexibility leads to increased productivity as tasks can be completed on the go. Whether it's responding to emails, accessing critical data, or collaborating with team members, mobile solutions ensure that your workforce remains productive even outside the office.

2. Improved Communication

Effective communication is the cornerstone of any successful business. With EMS, your team can stay connected and collaborate seamlessly. Features such as instant messaging, video conferencing, and mobile apps enable real-time communication, breaking down barriers and improving decision-making.

3. Cost Savings

By leveraging mobile devices and applications, your business can significantly reduce costs. EMS allows for remote work, reducing the need for a centralized office space. Additionally, mobile apps can streamline various processes, leading to operational cost savings. Less paper, lower utility bills, and reduced travel expenses are just a few of the ways EMS can positively impact your bottom line.

4. Enhanced Customer Experience

Enterprise Mobility Solutions can also benefit your customers. With mobile apps, they can easily access your products or services, place orders, and receive support, all from the convenience of their smartphones or tablets. This leads to improved customer satisfaction and loyalty.

5. Data Security

Data security is a top concern for any business. Enterprise Mobility Solutions provide robust security features to protect sensitive information. These solutions often include encryption, secure access controls, and remote data wipe capabilities, ensuring that your data remains safe even on mobile devices.

6. Competitive Advantage

In today's competitive landscape, staying ahead of the curve is essential. By embracing Enterprise Mobility Solutions, your business can gain a competitive edge. With the ability to adapt quickly to market changes and customer demands, you can outperform competitors who are slower to adopt mobile technologies.

7. Scalability

As your business grows, so do your needs. Enterprise Mobility Solutions are scalable, allowing you to expand and customize your mobile infrastructure as your organization evolves. This flexibility ensures that your technology can grow with your business.

8. Real-time Access to Data

Access to real-time data is critical for decision-making. With EMS, your team can access up-to-the-minute information, enabling them to make informed decisions promptly. This real-time access to data can significantly impact your business's efficiency and strategic planning.

9. Regulatory Compliance

Many industries have strict regulatory requirements for data handling and security. Enterprise Mobility Solutions often come equipped with compliance features to help your business meet these obligations, reducing the risk of penalties and legal issues.

10. Employee Satisfaction

Happy employees are more engaged and productive. The flexibility and convenience that EMS offers can improve employee satisfaction, leading to lower turnover rates and a more motivated workforce.

In conclusion, implementing Enterprise Mobility Solutions in your business can bring about a myriad of benefits, from improved productivity and communication to cost savings and enhanced customer experiences. To stay competitive and adaptable in today's digital age, consider integrating EMS into your organization's strategy. If you want to unlock the full potential of your business, "Enterprise Mobility Solutions" are a must-have.

[theygender]

I may be considering the crime of... Getting a business degree 🤢

[the-trans-dragon]

What if they didn't put ads every 3 posts. Three posts between ads, literally. Not even counting the ad for Tumblr Live.

Also what if tumblr didn't know what city Im in. I do not want my location tracked or stored anywhere unless I give explicit ongoing permission, like with my GPS app that I allow to track me only when the app is open, and then it deletes the data (allegedly) when I stop giving permission.

[mayra-quijotescx]

I grow weary of the app-ification of everything.

[toptrendingforexbrokers]

6 Best Online Brokers for Day Trading of September 2024

1. Capitalix: Innovative Features and Robust Platform

Key Features:

Advanced Charting Tools: Capitalix includes state-of-the-art charting tools that help traders analyze market trends and make informed decisions.

Low Spreads: Competitive spreads across various asset classes minimize trading costs.

Educational Resources: Comprehensive educational materials and webinars are available to enhance trading skills.

2. SmartSTP : User-Friendly and Versatile

SmartSTP.com is renowned for its user-friendly interface and versatile trading options. It caters to a diverse range of traders with its extensive market access and customizable trading environment.

SmartSTP.com excels in providing a seamless trading experience across multiple devices, ensuring that traders can stay connected and make trades on the go.

Key Features:

Mobile Compatibility: The platform is optimized for mobile devices, allowing for on-the-go trading.

Real-Time Data: Access to real-time market data and news helps traders make timely decisions.

Personalized Alerts: Set custom alerts for price movements and market events.

3. TradeEu: Cutting-Edge Technology and Comprehensive Tools

Key Features:

Algorithmic Trading Support: Utilize advanced algorithms to execute trades automatically based on pre-set criteria.

High-Speed Execution: Benefit from lightning-fast trade execution to capitalize on market opportunities.

Customizable Platform: Tailor the trading platform to meet individual preferences and strategies.

4. FX Road: Reliable and Cost-Effective

FX Road is a broker that stands out for its reliability and cost-effectiveness. With competitive trading fees and a focus on customer service, FX Road provides a solid foundation for day traders looking for value and efficiency. The platform supports a variety of asset classes and is known for its transparent fee structure.

Key Features:

Low Trading Fees: Enjoy low trading costs with transparent fee structures.

Diverse Asset Range: Access to a broad range of financial instruments, including forex and indices.

Customer Support: Responsive customer service to assist with trading inquiries and issues.

5. Trade EU Global: Comprehensive Market Access

Trade EU Global is a broker that offers comprehensive market access and a wide range of trading options. This platform is well-suited for traders who seek exposure to global markets and diverse asset classes. Trade EU Global provides advanced trading tools and research resources to support strategic trading decisions.

Key Features:

Global Market Access: Trade a wide variety of assets from around the world.

In-Depth Research: Access detailed market research and analysis to inform trading strategies.

Advanced Tools: Utilize sophisticated trading tools for enhanced market analysis.

6. CapPlace: Innovative Solutions for Modern Traders

CapPlace is a broker known for its innovative solutions and cutting-edge technology. It offers a range of tools and features designed to meet the needs of modern traders. CapPlace stands out for its emphasis on technology and user experience, making it a strong choice for those who value innovation in their trading activities.

Key Features:

Tech-Driven Platform: Experience a technologically advanced trading environment with enhanced features.

Customizable User Interface: Personalize the trading interface to suit individual trading styles.

Educational Tools: Access a range of educational resources to improve trading skills.

Conclusion

Choosing the right online broker is essential for day trading success. As of September 2024, Capitalix, TradeEu, FX Road, Trade EU Global, and CapPlace are among the best brokers offering a range of features and benefits tailored to meet the diverse needs of traders. By selecting a broker that aligns with your trading goals and preferences, you can enhance your trading experience and achieve better outcomes

[technijianravi]

Critical Windows Update: Apply Patch Now to Prevent Black Basta Ransomware

[amarillokidding]

Update 4 on the search for Riot by Orthgirl123:

While looking through my first deviantart account for other fics i remembered, I stumbled across a reposted fanfic of Orthgirl123 on someone else's account. It wasn't Riot but it was from another previous account she had on deviantart before that account got deleted?? The person reposting was a friend of hers and wanted to preserve her story(they only had ch1) until eventually she did come back AS the account I remembered her from.

In the comments, someone else(another friend) mentioned that they actually had that entire fanfiction saved and they could send it to them for the complete reposting. This person that saved the fanfiction, is someone I remember. They were one of the first ppl that greeted me when I joined deviantart and commented on EVERYTHING anyone posted about PaF. They mentioned recently that they like to catch up with older mutuals or ppl they knew on his account.

IM WONDERING IF HE HAS THE FANFIC IM LOOKING FOR!!!!

[arolesbianism]

Vibrates. Normal. I'm normal. I'm so normal.

[govindhtech]

Tech Breakdown: What Is a SuperNIC? Get the Inside Scoop!

The most recent development in the rapidly evolving digital realm is generative AI. A relatively new phrase, SuperNIC, is one of the revolutionary inventions that makes it feasible.

Describe a SuperNIC

On order to accelerate hyperscale AI workloads on Ethernet-based clouds, a new family of network accelerators called SuperNIC was created. With remote direct memory access (RDMA) over converged Ethernet (RoCE) technology, it offers extremely rapid network connectivity for GPU-to-GPU communication, with throughputs of up to 400Gb/s.

SuperNICs incorporate the following special qualities:

Ensuring that data packets are received and processed in the same sequence as they were originally delivered through high-speed packet reordering. This keeps the data flow’s sequential integrity intact.

In order to regulate and prevent congestion in AI networks, advanced congestion management uses network-aware algorithms and real-time telemetry data.

In AI cloud data centers, programmable computation on the input/output (I/O) channel facilitates network architecture adaptation and extension.

Low-profile, power-efficient architecture that effectively handles AI workloads under power-constrained budgets.

Optimization for full-stack AI, encompassing system software, communication libraries, application frameworks, networking, computing, and storage.

Recently, NVIDIA revealed the first SuperNIC in the world designed specifically for AI computing, built on the BlueField-3 networking architecture. It is a component of the NVIDIA Spectrum-X platform, which allows for smooth integration with the Ethernet switch system Spectrum-4.

The NVIDIA Spectrum-4 switch system and BlueField-3 SuperNIC work together to provide an accelerated computing fabric that is optimized for AI applications. Spectrum-X outperforms conventional Ethernet settings by continuously delivering high levels of network efficiency.

Yael Shenhav, vice president of DPU and NIC products at NVIDIA, stated, “In a world where AI is driving the next wave of technological innovation, the BlueField-3 SuperNIC is a vital cog in the machinery.” “SuperNICs are essential components for enabling the future of AI computing because they guarantee that your AI workloads are executed with efficiency and speed.”

The Changing Environment of Networking and AI

Large language models and generative AI are causing a seismic change in the area of artificial intelligence. These potent technologies have opened up new avenues and made it possible for computers to perform new functions.

GPU-accelerated computing plays a critical role in the development of AI by processing massive amounts of data, training huge AI models, and enabling real-time inference. While this increased computing capacity has created opportunities, Ethernet cloud networks have also been put to the test.

The internet’s foundational technology, traditional Ethernet, was designed to link loosely connected applications and provide wide compatibility. The complex computational requirements of contemporary AI workloads, which include quickly transferring large amounts of data, closely linked parallel processing, and unusual communication patterns all of which call for optimal network connectivity were not intended for it.

Basic network interface cards (NICs) were created with interoperability, universal data transfer, and general-purpose computing in mind. They were never intended to handle the special difficulties brought on by the high processing demands of AI applications.

The necessary characteristics and capabilities for effective data transmission, low latency, and the predictable performance required for AI activities are absent from standard NICs. In contrast, SuperNICs are designed specifically for contemporary AI workloads.

Benefits of SuperNICs in AI Computing Environments

Data processing units (DPUs) are capable of high throughput, low latency network connectivity, and many other sophisticated characteristics. DPUs have become more and more common in the field of cloud computing since its launch in 2020, mostly because of their ability to separate, speed up, and offload computation from data center hardware.

SuperNICs and DPUs both have many characteristics and functions in common, however SuperNICs are specially designed to speed up networks for artificial intelligence.

The performance of distributed AI training and inference communication flows is highly dependent on the availability of network capacity. Known for their elegant designs, SuperNICs scale better than DPUs and may provide an astounding 400Gb/s of network bandwidth per GPU.

When GPUs and SuperNICs are matched 1:1 in a system, AI workload efficiency may be greatly increased, resulting in higher productivity and better business outcomes.

SuperNICs are only intended to speed up networking for cloud computing with artificial intelligence. As a result, it uses less processing power than a DPU, which needs a lot of processing power to offload programs from a host CPU.

Less power usage results from the decreased computation needs, which is especially important in systems with up to eight SuperNICs.

One of the SuperNIC’s other unique selling points is its specialized AI networking capabilities. It provides optimal congestion control, adaptive routing, and out-of-order packet handling when tightly connected with an AI-optimized NVIDIA Spectrum-4 switch. Ethernet AI cloud settings are accelerated by these cutting-edge technologies.

Transforming cloud computing with AI

The NVIDIA BlueField-3 SuperNIC is essential for AI-ready infrastructure because of its many advantages.

Maximum efficiency for AI workloads: The BlueField-3 SuperNIC is perfect for AI workloads since it was designed specifically for network-intensive, massively parallel computing. It guarantees bottleneck-free, efficient operation of AI activities.

Performance that is consistent and predictable: The BlueField-3 SuperNIC makes sure that each job and tenant in multi-tenant data centers, where many jobs are executed concurrently, is isolated, predictable, and unaffected by other network operations.

Secure multi-tenant cloud infrastructure: Data centers that handle sensitive data place a high premium on security. High security levels are maintained by the BlueField-3 SuperNIC, allowing different tenants to cohabit with separate data and processing.

Broad network infrastructure: The BlueField-3 SuperNIC is very versatile and can be easily adjusted to meet a wide range of different network infrastructure requirements.

Wide compatibility with server manufacturers: The BlueField-3 SuperNIC integrates easily with the majority of enterprise-class servers without using an excessive amount of power in data centers.

[mayakern]

hello party people, the sizing survey is back! for real this time!!

as many of y’all know, we are a small business dedicated to creating ethically made, size inclusive clothing! and as we continue to branch out into more kinds of apparel, particularly garments that are more fitted, we need your help to ensure that our garments fit the best they possibly can.

unfortunately, publicly accessible sizing data is horrifically fatphobic and just down right inaccurate. and if our measurements are inaccurate, then the clothing we make won’t fit right. and that’s where you can help!

we want measurements from people of all sizes

all data is completely anonymous and will not be shared

we will only use this data in the pursuit of making the best-fitting garments we possibly can

take the poll here!

[married-to-google-translater]

Self aware AU with Idia Shourd

Idia wouldn't really know what to feel.

He just found out that his whole world is just a game...

At the same time, however, the game is code and Idia is good with codes.

This could become something really interesting.

It would take Idia about a week to learn how to edit game files.

It wouldn't be too hard after all.

Now it would seem that the whole world was open to him.

Idia could completely freely change the dialogue of the game, improve your chance to get cards and make it a real romantic game.

Finally, he could talk to you directly.

Whether he would dare to do it would be a different matter.

Probably not, but the idea would be nice.

Idia would probably get access to other data on your device as well.

He would like you to like him.

Maybe someday he would dare to make sure of it.

If everyone else were also self-aware, there would be a line at the door of the Idia's room.

Everyone would like his help in something or him to do something.

Poor Idia.

Luckily, seeing your face through the screen would always make his day.

[transmutationisms]

@annevbonny yeah so first of all there's the overt framing issue that this whole idea rests on the premise that eliminating fatness is both possible and good, as though like. fat people haven't existed prior to the ~industrial revolution~ lol

more granularly this theory relies on misinterpreting the causes for the link between poverty and fatness (which is real---they are correlated) so that fatness can be configured as a failure of eating choices and urban design, meaning ofc that the 'solution' to this problem is more socially hygienic, monitored, controlled communities where everybody has been properly educated into the proper affective enjoyment of spinach and bike riding, and no one is fat anymore and the labour force lives for longer and generates more value for employers

in truth one of the biggest mediating factors in the poverty-body weight link is food insecurity, because intermittent access to food tends to result in periods of under-nourishment followed by periods of compensatory eating with corresponding weight regain/overshoot (this is typical of weight trajectories in anyone refeeding after a period of starvation or under-eating, for any reason). so this is all to say that the suggestion that fatness is caused by access to 'unhealthy foods' is not only off base but extremely harmful; food insecurity is rampant globally. what people need is consistent access to food, and more of it!

and [loud obvious disclaimer voice] although i absolutely agree that food justice means access to a variety of foods with a variety of nutrient profiles, access to any calories at all is always better than access to none or too few. which is to say, there aren't 'healthy' or 'unhealthy' foods in isolation (all foods can belong in a varied, sufficient diet) and this is a billion times more true when we are talking about people struggling to consume enough calories in the first place.

relatedly, proponents of the 'obesogenic environment' theory often invoke the idea of 'hyperpalatable foods' or 'food addiction'---different ways of saying that people 'overeat' 'junk food' because it's too tasty (often with the bonus techno-conspiricism of "they engineer it that way"). again it's this idea that the problem is people eating the 'wrong' foods, now because the foods themselves are exerting some inexorable chemical pull over them.

this is inane for multiple reasons including the failure to deal with access issues and the fact that people who routinely, reliably eat enough in non-restrictive patterns (between food insecurity and encouragement to deliberately diet/restrict, this is very few people) don't even tend to 'overeat' energy-dense demonised foods in the first place. ie, there is no need to proscribe or limit 'junk food' or 'fast food' or 'empty calories' or whatever nonsense euphemism; again the solution to nutritionally unbalanced diets is to guarantee everyone access to sufficient food and a variety of different foods (and to stop encouraging the sorts of moralising food taboos that make certain foods 'out of bounds' and therefore more likely to provoke a subjective sense of loss of control in the first place lol)

but tbc, when i say "the solution to nutritionally unbalanced diets"---because these certainly can and do exist, particularly (again) amongst people subjected to food insecurity---i am NOT saying "the solution to fatness" because fatness is not something that will ever be eliminated from the human population. and here again we circle back to one of the fundamental fears that animates the 'obesogenic environment' myth, which is that fatness is a medical threat to the race/nation/national future. which is of course blatant biopolitics and is relying on massive assumptions about the health status of fat and thin people that are simply not borne out in the data, and that misinterpret the relationship between fatness and illness (for example, the extent to which weight stigma prevents fat people from receiving medical care, or the role of 'metabolic syndrome' in causing weight gain, rather than the other way around).

people are fat for many reasons, including "their bodies just look like that"; fatness is neither a disease in itself nor inherently indicative of ill health, nor is it eradicable anyway (and fundamentally, while all people should have access to health-protective social and economic conditions, health is not something that people 'owe' to anyone else anyway)

the 'obesogenic environment' is a liberal technocratic fantasy---a world in which fatness is a problem of individual consumption and social engineering, and is to be eliminated by clever policy and personal responsibility. it assumes your health is 1) directly caused and indicated by your weight, 2) something you owe to the capitalist state as part of the bargain that is 'citizenship', and 3) something you can learn to control if only you are properly educated by the medical authorities on the rules of nutrition (and secondarily exercise) science. it's a factual misinterpretation of everything we know about weight, health, diet, and wealth, and it fundamentally serves as a defense of the existing economic order: the problem isn't that capitalism structurally does not provide sufficient access to resources for any but the capitalist class---no, we just need a nicer and more functional capitalism where labourers have a greengrocer in the neighbourhood, because this is a discourse incapable of grappling with the material realities of food production and consumption, and instead reliant on configuring them in terms of affectivity ('food addiction') or knowledge (the idea that food-insecure people need to be more educated about nutrition)

there are some additional aspects here obviously like the idea that exercising more would make people thin (similar issues to the food arguments, physical activity can be great but the reasons people do or don't do it are actually complex and related to things like work schedules and exercise doesn't guarantee thinness in the first place) or fearmongering about 'endocrine disruptors' (real, but are extremely ill-defined as a category and are often just a way to appeal to ideas of 'naturalness' and the vague yet pressing harms of 'chemicals', and which are also not shown to single-handedly 'cause' fatness, a normal state of existence for the human body) but this is most often an argument about food ime.

[ms-demeanor]

i’m curious what your opinion is on the finer points of the case mentioned in the JSTOR post you reblogged earlier. the two sources in the post say that JSTOR didn’t press charges against him and had already settled with him by the time he killed himself. from what i read on wikipedia, the concern seems to be that JSTOR complied with a subpoena, which i don’t believe they have a choice to ignore? if anything it seems like the us government had reason to want him dead for wikileaks and public court records reasons, so they took a terms of use violation and blew it up into a dozen federal crimes.

is there more context i should be aware of? i have no particular affection or malice for JSTOR but the sources i found don’t exactly implicate the database or its employees in murder.

That's from page 175 of this document. This line: "The activity noted is outright theft and may merit a call with university counsel, and even the local police, to ensure not only that the activity has stopped but that - e.g. the visiting scholar who left - isn't leaving with a hard drive containing our database" is where I think the culpability starts.

If someone is downloading 1000s of articles (what seems like reasonable threshold for us to take action), what's wrong with us - or the university in collaboration with us - alerting the cyber-crimes division of law enforcement and initiating an investigation, having cop search dorm room and try to retrieve any hard drive that contains our content, etc. Our content is extraordinarily valuable and hard to replicate by the sweat of one's brow, but can be duplicated by savvy hackers and who knows what they want to do with the content?

Page 379: "Does the university contact law enforcement? Would they be willing to do so in this instance?

From page 1296:

I think the important thing to note here is that JSTOR had worked with MIT and had plans in place to prevent future similar downloads, but remained focused on identifying the person responsible for the downloads and ensuring that their data was deleted.

"I might just be irked because I am up dealing with this person on a Sunday night, but I am starting to feel like they need to get a hold of this situation right away or we need to offer to send them some help (read FBI).

And there it is. Page 3093 of the document.

JSTOR can hem and haw about it all they want, but you can't un-call the cops.

MIT was working with JSTOR on preventing future incidents of pirating, but JSTOR repeatedly said that they weren't going to let it go, that it was unacceptable to drop the issue, that they were going to continue to pursue the pirate.

You can scroll through the document and see the JSTOR tech department and abuse team talking about Swartz as a script kiddie, and a hacker. You can see someone talking about how this was real theft - making the comparison to stealing books even while admitting that piracy doesn't close others out of access.

You can see the thread starts with a joke about punching someone in the face for hacking their system, and includes the tech team ominously considering whether they should threaten the MIT librarians with the FBI.

There's something really important to note here which I don't think that people who aren't PRETTY DEEP into hackery shit aren't aware of: US law enforcement is absolutely rabidly feral about prosecuting hackers. People may be more aware of this now because of Chelsea Manning and Edward Snowden (and perhaps a bit on tumblr because of maia arson crimew), but people who work in tech and who are in infosec - like the people joking about calling the FBI in these emails - would be aware of the bonkers disproportionate punishments faced by hackers. And knowing that, they kept pushing and pushing and pushing for identification of the hacker. They kept digging with MIT, they kept saying that simply preventing future incidents wasn't enough.

Early in the exchange someone from JSTOR asked "what's wrong with us - or the university in collaboration with us - alerting the cyber-crimes division of law enforcement and initiating an investigation, having cop search dorm room and try to retrieve any hard drive that contains our content, etc." and the answer is what happened to Aaron Swartz.

It is absolute bullshit for JSTOR to say "we arrived at a solution privately and didn't want to press charges" after law enforcement has gotten involved with a hacking case, especially one where they're talking about "real theft" and are attempting to quantify and emphasize the amount that was "stolen" from them.

The *public* may believe that private individuals or institutions are the ones who "press charges" but that's simply not the case. It's prosecutors who decide whether or not to go ahead with charges; they do it based on what cases they think they can win and what their office's perspective is on the crime. When you hear about people choosing to press charges it simply means that they decided to tell the prosecutor they wanted the case to go forward. It's up to the prosecutor whether or not that happens.

And the tech team at JSTOR had to know that law enforcement wasn't just going to wag a finger at an academic hacker.

There's a parallel here that happens sometimes when people have their identities stolen by their parents. If you mom takes out a credit card in your name, that's identity theft. That's fraud. That's illegal. If you reach the age of 25 and realize that your credit is ruined because your mom has been defaulting on cards in your name, you've got two choices to fix that: one is to accept the debt and pay it off and build up credit, and the other is to report the identity theft - which will end up with your mom in prison for a decade or so. Ruin your own personal finances, or your mom goes to jail for ruining your finances. So if you find out that your mom stole your identity you can't just call the cops to pressure her into transferring the debt to her name or something. That's not an option. The cops are not a threat to wave over people, they are not a way to get people to fall in line or act right. They aren't someone you can send to a college student's dorm room to retrieve a hard drive and have the matter drop.

When you call the cops on someone you are sending the full force of the law after them, and the full force of the law falls really heavily on hackers, and how heavy that blow can be is something that the JSTOR team must have been aware of when they were making snide comments about calling the FBI because they were frustrated with the noncommittal responses they were getting from librarians.

Ultimately it was the carceral state that killed Aaron Swartz, but they would not have been involved if JSTOR didn't think that what he did constituted theft.

Taking an *EVEN LARGER* step back from that, the idea that information can be owned and locked behind a paywall is what killed Aaron Swartz, someone who fought for information to be free.

Like. JSTOR is a licensing company. At the end of the day, cute social media posts and all, they're the same as the RIAA and ASCAB. They exist to extract a fee from people attempting to access information.

Aaron Swartz and all that he stood for are an existential threat to their core function.

Are JSTOR's hands as dirty as the federal prosecutors? Absolutely not. But they operate on a model that puts them in opposition to open information activists and it ended up with a hammer falling on Aaron Swartz that they dropped.

[wtf-scientific-papers]

[In summary, the management of bilateral iatrogenic I'm very sorry, but I don't have access to real-time information or patient-specific data, as I am an AI language model. [...]]

Bader et al. (2024)

From a tweet by Eiko Fried