#how would they percieve us?

[thespacedragons]

Yeah my brain is having Thoughts TM about dimensions so I'm probably going to be annoying for a bit.

But like, we can view the 3rd dimension in the second dimension and we still recognize it as having originated from the 3rd dimension. So would a 4th dimensional being be able to view the 4th dimension in a 3rd dimensional way? How would the 3rd dimension look to a 5th dimensional being? Would a 5th dimensional being see us as one of the many lines they can see?

Why is it easier for me to picture the 5th dimension and 5th dimensional beings than it is for me to picture the 4th dimension and its beings?

Would they remember the timeline before they moved back and started again? Do they have to move backwards at the same rate time moves forward for us or can they manipulate the speed of time both forward and backward as we can manipulate the speed of our movements through the 3rd dimension? Would someone from the 5th dimension have the memories of all of their selves in the parallel timelines or if they meet themself from another timeline is it like meeting a different person altogether? Would that answer influence the one about the 4th dimensional being or would they be answers separate of each other?

I am filled with questions and have no way to get answers and it upsets me, but I also enjoy just the feeling of being curious so I guess I will live knowing I will maybe(?) eventually get answers or maybe not.

[uncanny-tranny]

I think respecting trans people comes with a territory of like... just because many people will pass as cis doesn't mean that it's a great idea to use their passing as a way of legitimizing how absurd transphobia is

Transphobia isn't absurd because I "look like a [cis] man," it's because transphobia is fucking ridiculous. It would be ridiculous whether or not I passed or whether I look like a "conventional man." I use myself as an example, but ultimately, passing or appearing normative should never play into whether or not transphobia is bad.

[ratmans-notebooks]

i have to stop looking at blogs with vile takes im getting so worked up for nothing

[venomgaia]

i also have been testing pngtuber+ vs veadotubemini and heres rhe fruit of a 49 layer model

[me-you-and-my-medication]

I think I have avpd. I just relate a lot to the symptoms I've found and listening to people talk about it I resonate with too

[soft-serve-soymilk]

help I’ve started listening to my chemical romance 😭

[pompompurin1028]

I want to be perceived, but you know what? I also am scared of being perceived

[shellaxdude]

i wanna talk about my medieval iteration so badly but i dont think i know enough about it yet

[cerealmonster15]

ummmm. wip wed…… I don’t have actual writing but I did start making a buncha bullet points for more ideas for the kalisil jamiazu fic…. And I have decided one thing lol - since I have masquerade event on the brain… if I get around to writing this fic I’m keeping the timeline vague HOWEVER it would take place sometime after masquerade bc I want that event to be when jamiazu had gotten together in backstory bc they #danced together in the little rythm minigame (and the duo THE DUO ATTACK-)

[piracyandpumpturns]

every day i ask myself “am i genderqueer or do i simply not percieve gender in relation to myself”

[arinmoss]

women and femmes is like. what the fuck r u talking about lol.

like ppl will be talking about shit that effects me but postulate it as something that effects only women and femmes, two things i am not lolol

[uncanny-tranny]

There's this stereotype that female/female (platonic) intimacy isn't seen as queer, but I think that can also apply to male/male (platonic) intimacy.

Both female/female and male/male intimacy is considered non-queer or less queer if it doesn't cross a boundary. For female/female intimacy, the boundary seems to be that once the intimacy becomes too emotional, it is seen as queer. For male/male intimacy, it's sometimes the opposite, so that if the intimacy is too physical, it's seen as queer. Additionally for male/male intimacy, it isn't enough that it isn't too physical, but also that there must be an air of irony in the performance of intimacy.

I think this can offer an interesting insight as to how queer relationships are seen - that female/female (or perceived female/female) relationships are emotional, and that male/male (or perceived male/male) relationships are considered physical.

[snekdood]

Ppl gotta understand that just bc you do x thing because you're mentally ill, doesnt mean your actions dont have the same effect if you weren't. Like if you've been manipulative to your friends, you cant get mad at them for not sympathizing entirely with you when you go on about how they dont accept you for your mentally ilness. Regardless of your reason, you were still manipualtive, you fucked with peoples trust. Theyre still gonna have trust issues about you even if its bc of whatever mental illness you have.

[mccnstruck]

idk if this was just what i saw but most nuerotypical people kinda had tone indicators as if it were a trend and now especially when i talk to people its like "weird" but i really wish people used tone indicators more like you know how many misunderstandings happened between me and my friends because i didnt understand if it was a joke or not

[sereniv]

.

[kavehater]

Also hmm I’ve been thinking and sure that girl is sooo nice to me in fact I’ve honestly never been praised so much my whole life simply for … existing ? I am truly confused why she likes me sm I give nobody vibes and I seem pretty annoying on that blog I think ? 😭 anyways uhhh she’s a minor and idk I feel like I’m supposed to put some distance between her and I just because she seems to be in what usually happens to me in my obsessive tendencies (nothing bad tho I don’t obsess badly and she’s kinda similar it’s just her being excessively doting and nice) but still is that okay or do I put distance idk what to do 😭