Tumgik
#oakland as
stereax · 7 months
Text
Tumblr media
4 notes · View notes
release-th-kraken · 1 year
Text
hearing that the coliseum has 28 thousand ppl at the game tn and the As just tied it against the best team in baseball... my heart is so warm rn
5 notes · View notes
orioles4lyfe · 11 months
Text
Tumblr media
3 notes · View notes
aci25 · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media
Oakland, California
47K notes · View notes
subsidystadium · 9 days
Text
Applied Analysis claims Las Vegas saw a $1 billion economic impact from the Super Bowl
Recently, Forbes ran a story that suggested that the city of Las Vegas was suddenly flush with new money, largely due to the city hosting Super Bowl LVIII in February. This wasn’t just some big event, this “was on another level” according to this story. Las Vegas saw a $1 billion economic impact from hosting the Super Bowl! Where did these numbers come from? “Those consumer actions resulted in $1…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
1 note · View note
boytransmission · 14 days
Text
Tumblr media
I kept mishearing a lyric from Sir Mix-A-Lot’s “Baby Got Back” and this is what it said to me
Top surgery fund!!!!!!!!
5K notes · View notes
dalydose22 · 11 months
Text
0 notes
donmegabc · 1 year
Text
The A’s belong in Oakland. Don’t tear the team away from a loyal, passionate fan base! Attendance issues can be blamed on the lack of maintenance of the coliseum and ownership always trading away high performing and fan favorite players.
1 note · View note
petitworld · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
Grand Lake, Oakland, California, USA by Claire Ames
3K notes · View notes
gunsounds · 10 months
Text
Tumblr media
Tacos and pineapple juice 🌮
3K notes · View notes
qualitystart · 3 months
Text
obsessed with how much fun lindsey wasson is having with color and shape and light and shadow and framing in her spring training photos
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
she's everything to me
955 notes · View notes
reasonsforhope · 5 months
Text
"Palestinian plaintiffs and their legal representatives on Friday [January 26, 2024] presented a powerful case in federal court accusing President Joe Biden and other top US officials of complicity in Israel's genocide in Gaza.
People around the world tuned in for the long-awaited hearing in Oakland, with plaintiffs appearing in person and over Zoom in an unprecedented effort to hold the Biden administration accountable for its actions in Gaza.
The Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) filed the lawsuit in November 2023 on behalf of Defense for Children International–Palestine, Al-Haq, and eight Palestinians in the US and Palestine. The complaint accuses President Joe Biden, Secretary of State Antony Blinken, and Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin of failing to live up to their legal responsibilities under the 1948 Genocide Convention and the 1988 Genocide Convention Implementation Act.
The United Nations convention classifies complicity in genocide, or the intentional destruction of a people in whole or in part, as a crime under international law and requires that states take measures to prevent such atrocities.
[Note: This is a big reason why politicians almost never call it a genocide, btw. Because if a country recognizes that it's a genocide, then they actually are legally required to do a bunch of things to stop it, under international law.]
The historic lawsuit contends that the Biden administration has failed to uphold its obligations by continuing to provide diplomatic and military support for Israel's brutal campaign in Gaza. Plaintiffs are asking the court to stop Biden from sending more weapons and munitions to Israel that are being used to kill Palestinians en masse.
The hearing before the US District Court for the Northern District of California took place just hours after the International Court of Justice issued provisional measures against Israel in a landmark case brought by South Africa.
-via TAG24, January 26, 2024. Article continues below.
Court contends with questions of jurisdiction and responsibility
In evaluating the allegations, questioning in Friday's hearing revolved around the so-called political question doctrine, by which federal courts regularly refrain from ruling on political matters seen as best resolved by the president and Congress.
The Department of Justice argued that according to the doctrine, the court has no jurisdiction to rule in the case.
"If the court condemns United States foreign policy toward Israel, it could cause international embarrassment and undermine foreign policy decisions in the sensitive context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict," defense counsel Jean Lin told Senior District Judge Jeffrey S. White.
Katherine Gallagher of the CCR countered that the court does, indeed, have a responsibility to step in: "Here, the question is a legal one, whether the actions undertaken by the United States failed to uphold the obligation to prevent genocide, and that is an active obligation that requires that the United States not provide the means by which a genocide is being furthered."
"There is no discretion for any state to evade its obligations, its legal obligations. These are not policy decisions," she said.
Palestinian plaintiffs share powerful testimonies before the court
After legal arguments in the case, Judge White heard two hours of gut-wrenching testimony from Palestinian plaintiffs and a renowned Holocaust and genocide expert.
Rubin Presidential Chair of Jewish History at Wake Forest University Dr. Barry Trachtenberg shared his remarks before the court in spite of vehement US government opposition.
"To have an event fall under the 1948 Convention on Genocide requires both action and intent, and here we see that very, very clearly in a way that seems really quite unique in history," he stated, noting that there is now an opportunity to stop Israel's unfolding genocide in real time to prevent further loss of lives...
Judge White said he would take the testimonies to heart as he evaluates his constitutional responsibilities, describing the case as "the most difficult judicial decision" he has ever had to make."
-via TAG24, January 26, 2024
-
Note: I know a lot of people are really not gonna appreciate that last line. I'm not thrilled with it either. But it is worth noting that having a federal court overrule the US president's huge foreign policy and military decisions would be an absolutely massive deal/precedent
This is a case that deserves to be ruled on with an incredible amount of seriousness, if only because if you're a federal judge who's going to make that call, your written decision/legal justification needs to be unimpeachable
That said, if the judge uses jurisdiction to pass the buck here and avoid his legal and human responsibility to do what he can to stop a genocide, I'm gonna be pissed
2K notes · View notes
brettesims · 5 months
Text
Free Palestine!
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Oakland, CA
Love demands a permanent ceasefire!
FREE 🍉
1K notes · View notes
swizziee · 1 year
Photo
Tumblr media
Too $hort. (2000)
4K notes · View notes
catcrumb · 9 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
tomatocat made some lovely friends today... teared up a little at not being able to stay with those friends forever... the dumplings barely managed to soothe
3K notes · View notes
subsidystadium · 5 months
Text
Chattanooga's
In Chattanooga, the price of their new ballpark continues to skyrocket. If you remember, two years ago, the city was facing fierce opposition from locals who didn’t want to give any taxpayer money towards a new ballpark. But the city decided that this new ballpark would be a “home run for the community” and approved the deal.  This meant the city would be putting up roughly $80 million dollars…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes