#opportunities in australia

[shumailach-blog]

Australian Skilled Visas on Priority for Nurses, Teachers; Apply Now!

Highlights: Priority to nurses and teachers while granting Australian skilled visas.

Australia is addressing its scarcity of nurses and teachers by prioritizing their skilled visa applications.

Those in the occupations on the priority list will get their visa applications assessed in three days.

For some Australian skilled visa types, application processing has been done to ministerial instructions with PMSOL scrapped.

Australia needs more professionals, including nurses and teachers. In fact, there’s a list of professions that are used to prioritize the order of assessment of applications for Australian skilled visas. This new system works on priority occupations set by following ministerial instructions.

Now, the skilled visa applications of professionals like nurses and teachers will be assessed within as early as three days.

Since the abolition of PMSOL (Priority Migration Skilled Occupation List), the ranking of visa applications is done based on professions. Those in demand are given weightage.

These are professions like nurses and teachers who are urgently needed in Australia in large numbers. To gain a perspective of this situation, consider this fact. It’s expected that a shortfall of teachers in Australia by 4,000 positions will be witnessed by 2025.

Unlike the current system of skilled visa application assessment, PMSOL had a large list of occupations. PMSOL had even those professions which were not critically lacking in skilled workers. This made PMSOL ineffective and was replaced by the currently active priority system.

Priority in doing visa application assessment will be given to the following high-demand occupations. These professionals will get their Australian skilled visa applications processed at the earliest:

School teachers

Counselors and psychologists

Nursing support workers

Childcare workers and childcare center managers

Medical scientists

Social workers

Aged and disabled carers

Medical technicians

Australian visas processed as per priority

Here’s a list of visas that are processed according to the new priority standards:

Subclass 124 (Distinguished Talent)

Subclass 188 (Business Innovation and Investment) (Provisional)

Subclass 191 (Permanent Residence (Skilled Regional))

Subclass 489 (Skilled – Regional (Provisional))

Subclass 858 (Global Talent)

Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme)

Subclass 189 (Skilled – Independent)

Subclass 457 (Temporary Work (Skilled))

Subclass 491 (Skilled Work Regional (Provisional))

Subclass 887 (Skilled – Regional)

Subclass 187 (Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme)

Subclass 190 (Skilled – Nominated)

Subclass 482 (Temporary Skill Shortage)

Subclass 494 (Employer Sponsored Regional (Provisional))

Subclass 888 (Business Innovation and Investment (Permanent)

The takeaway

Here’s the right and the best time for professionals like nurses and teachers to apply for skilled immigration to Australia. You can settle in Australia and build a career with good pay and a high-quality lifestyle.

We want you to access the best career opportunities in Australia. Let’s help you migrate to Australia. Talk to Y-Axis, the leading immigration and career consultant in the world.

Global citizens are the future. We help make it possible through our immigration services.

Also Read: Australia Canberra draw invited 563 candidates to apply for ACT nomination Web Story: Australia has a massive shortage of Nurses and Teachers. Apply now and get your visa in just a few days.

Source: https://www.y-axis.com/news/australian-skilled-visas-on-priority-for-nurses-teachers-apply-now/

[nando161mando]

This is why you owe them nothing, they would not do it for you.

[oddly-casual]

Fiona and Cake spoilers seriously

(Something I noticed abt Betty and Simons relationship)

I love Betty and Simon’s relationship, I think their back story is so cute and romantic and all that lovely stuff don’t get me wrong.

But there’s this under tone of Betty constantly giving things up for Simon and we don’t really talk about it a lot???

Like, Betty let Simon have his moment with the artifact and the pubic, she also doesn’t go to her trip in favor of going on an expedition with Simon. Then when she goes to leave again she stays for Simon.

Even Fiona is like “you went with her on the bus?” And Simon just looks all confused like “what? No, why would I do that?” Like- hello???

Then after that she gave up her entire life and mind to get Simon back to the point where she literally says “I don’t know who I am without him anymore.” And that just sucks! Since the beginning Betty has been the one giving up the most, her mind, her own possible career, and it’s a story of love of course and it’s very sweet but it’s also a story of sacrifice.

Their love wasn’t a perfect solution, it was already sort of imbalanced when it started and I lowkey love how we see those cracks even before they’re together.

Again, I love their relationship and I think it’s sweet. I just think we should talk about Betty’s side more, especially when she tells a story of what most women do in relationships, sacrifice.

[pookiepiastri]

CARLOS P2 FORZA FERRARI FR

[crabussy]

MULTIPLE people thought I was australian on that poll.... head in hands

[claireverlasting]

You’re laughing. I got stuck in a time loop and every day is Groundhog Day and you’re laughing.

[cainballad]

Pondering about the pilgrimage in Luca

Young Auron - @lastaim

(First picture; the morning before Supanova opens and the second pic is when the sun is setting after the con, first day)

[killeroos]

CWC23 - AUSTRALIA'S ON FIELD CELEBRATIONS

[idsb]

Having a little moving blowout sale of my Etsy shop’s backstocked inventory before I move to Aus! The shop is still going strong (working on a fun rebrand), I’m just going from having backstock and shipping myself when I’m home from tour, to exclusively having a US based warehouse ship the items.

Most things are ~$15 off the original price after shipping. Go to my Instagram and swipe through my story to shop!!! Prices with shipping included applies to US & Australian based addresses only okay please & thank you 🥺💖

[friendly-neighborhood-reblogs]

Phantom running for 35 YEARS on Broadway only to close one week after I start hyperfixating on it is the epitome of my usual experience entering new fandoms.

[nando161mando]

UFC Fighter Bassil Hafez seizes the opportunity of his victory speech to call for a "free Palestine."

[firelord-frowny]

a lil tip, a lil Suggestion for anyone who plans to have kids or who already has tiny kids....

if you have a choice, maybe don't live in a location where the only thing surrounding you for miles and miles is just more houses :/

like, either live somewhere where there's easy access to nature/outdoor recreation, or live somewhere where there's easy access to a wide variety of activities - museums, sports, concert venues, rec centers, music lessons, dance lessons, blah blah.

maybe don't live somewhere where it will be a huge inconvenience for you to take your kid out to do/see things that interest them on a regular basis.

it is so fucking depressing to be a kid and to almost never get to do or see anything you think is neat because it's Too Far for your parents to feel like taking you there.

honestly like. it's a big enough deal that i legit feel like parents should absolutely be willing to completely relocate if it means living somewhere where their kid can do what makes them happy.

like, if you live in fuckinnn florida and your kid wants to be a rock climber, you better pack your shit up and move to colorado or whereverthefuck. if you live in kansas and your kid wants to surf, move to california, goddammit.

i mean obviouslyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy it's not always possible to live anywhere but where you're currently living for a myriad of reasons, but if it is possible, even if it's not easy, please please please don't doom your kid to a childhood of longing and unfulfillment just because you live in the wrong place omg.

[coochiequeens]

But the system oppresses poor trans laydees.

By Eva Kurilova. September 26, 2023

Australia’s Human Rights Commission has released a preliminary decision prohibiting lesbians from holding events for females due to the exclusion of men who identify as “women.” The Commission’s decision comes after a lesbian rights group applied for an exemption under the Sex Discrimination Act 1984.

The application to the Commission was submitted by long-time Australian women’s rights activist Jean Taylor on behalf of herself and the members of the Lesbian Action Group, a collective established to address discrimination experienced by lesbians. The application provided an overview of lesbian organizing and gatherings in Victoria since the early 1970s, arguing that, “many thousands of lesbians benefited from the sense of pride, recognition and wellbeing that a large, well [publicized], public lesbian specific gathering encourages in the participants.”

However, this started to change in 2003 when trans activists challenged the organizers of the 2004 Lesbian Festival, accusing female-only spaces as being discriminatory under the law. This caused the festival organizers to seek and be awarded an exemption that allowed them to invite and only allow access to “lesbians born female.” 

The exemption was revoked on a technicality, resulting in lesbian gatherings in Australia being driven underground for almost two decades in an effort to avoid more challenges from the transgender community.

The Sex Discrimination Act was then amended in 2013 to include gender identity, making it even more difficult to organize single-sex events.

Frustrated by the situation, the Lesbian Action Group attempted to organize a female-only lesbian event at the Victorian Pride Centre this past August. The event was meant to celebrate International Lesbian Day on October 15, 2023, but the Pride Centre declined the booking, claiming that it was exclusionary and conflicted with the organization’s aim of supporting “equality, diversity and inclusion.”

As a result, the Lesbian Action Group applied for a 5-year exemption with the Australian Human Rights Commission with the intention of approaching another venue for the International Lesbian Day event if the exemption was granted. The group also intended to subsequently hold regular female-only lesbian events during its exemption period.

After receiving the application, the Commission requested further information from the Lesbian Action Group, asking for more details about why it is “reasonable and necessary to exclude the relevant groups mentioned in the application and restrict the event to female born lesbians.”

The Group then complied and provided a document of additional information further explaining the importance for minority groups like lesbians to have the freedom to associate with one another and to hold their own events.

The Commission received a total of 236 submissions on the application from individuals and groups by the closing date of September 1, 2023. Of those submissions, 123 individuals and 15 organizations were in favor of the exemption while 82 individuals and 14 organizations were opposed.

One of the applications opposed to the exemption came from Equal Opportunity Tasmania and referred to the Tasmanian Anti-Discrimination Commissioner ruling late last year that women-only events are discriminatory towards men who claim they are women. 

In its ruling, the Tasmanian Commissioner wrote that “The applicants propose to exclude ‘biological males’ from their event… The exclusion of such persons engages the provisions of the act prohibiting direct discrimination on the basis of gender and gender identity.”

Like the Tasmanian Anti-Discrimination Commissioner, the Australian Human Rights Commission’s preliminary view is that it will not grant the temporary 5-year exemption sought by the Lesbian Action Group to host its International Lesbian Day Event or to hold subsequent female-only lesbian events.

While the Commission recognized that “lesbians in Australia have faced structural and entrenched discrimination” and that “it may be important and beneficial for lesbians to gather together as a community,” it nevertheless was not persuaded that it is appropriate or reasonable to “make distinctions between women based on their cisgender or transgender experience.”

The ruling continued:

“The Commission notes that the grant of this exemption may lead to the further exclusion of and discrimination against same-sex attracted transgender women. Transgender women are a group who have and continue to experience discrimination, harassment and social exclusion.”

Australian women’s rights activist Janet Inglis took to X (formerly Twitter) to express her disappointment with the decision.

“Australian lesbians are being denied fairness,” she wrote. “They are being denied their humanity. I am so ashamed of my country.”

Speaking to Reduxx, Inglis said that Victoria is now joining Tasmania in “forcing lesbians underground and out of the public sphere.”

Inglis called it a “damning indictment of Australia” that both federal legislation and the Human Rights Commission have barred lesbians from holding single-sex events.

“The gender amendments to the SDA [Sex Discrimination Act] must be repealed. Our HRC has proven itself unfit for purpose and must be disbanded if it can no longer distinguish between men and women because of shonky legislation,” she explained. “A true HRC would be working to repeal those amendments and restore the rights of lesbians to be recognised in their own right.”

On X, Inglis also called on others to consider making a submission to respond to the Commission’s preliminary view before the October 3, 2023 deadline.

“The War on Women is gaining pace in Australia,” she added. “Australia is so far down the gender rabbit hole it’s truly frightening.”

This is not the first time that Australian women have run into issues with the law in regard to gender identity.

In May of this year, a woman was visited by New South Wales Police after she spoke to media about a trans activist by the name of Riley Dennis who was reportedly injuring female players in a women’s football league. The woman was given an Apprehended Violence Order which required her not to discuss Dennis. Reduxx was also contacted by the Australian eSafety Commissioner and advised to censor or delete an article naming Dennis.

Later that month, two women in Australia were contacted by Twitter and informed that they had broken Australian law by criticizing a trans-identified male for breastfeeding a child.

[henrywasnthereaskanyone]

Oh, they didn’t do the anteater line. I was kind of looking forward to that :/

[infipre]

Exceptional Web Development Services in Australia | Infipre IT Services

Elevate your online presence with our bespoke web development services in Australia. From stunning designs to seamless functionality, Infipre IT Services brings your vision to life. Let's create a captivating digital experience for your audience!

[radlymona]

The Voice referendum has pretty decisively failed :/