#processed foods are killing us

[nourishnest]

The Deadly Snail Pace of Food: More Fatal Than Cancer

Food is a fundamental part of our daily lives, providing nourishment and sustenance. However, what if I told you that it is also the cause of more deaths than cancer? Yes, you read that right. Food is responsible for more fatalities than one of the most feared diseases in the world. This may come as a shock, as food is often associated with comfort and pleasure. But beneath its enticing facade lies a slow killer, silently taking lives at a snail's pace. In this blog post, we will delve into the dark side of food and explore the deadly consequences of its slow pace. Brace yourself for a startling revelation about the world's slowest serial killer: food.

Unmasking the World's Slowest Serial Killer: The Hidden Threat in Our Food

Food, the very thing that sustains us, has a dark side that often goes unnoticed. We consume it daily without a second thought, never suspecting that it may be the cause of more deaths than one of the most dreaded diseases in the world. It may seem impossible, but it's true. Food, in all its delectable forms, has the potential to be a slow serial killer.

The hidden threat lies in the toxins, contaminants, and bacteria that can infiltrate our food, lurking beneath its appetizing exterior. From harmful pesticides to deadly pathogens, our plates are sometimes laden with danger. What makes this threat even more insidious is its gradual, relentless nature. Unlike the immediate impact of diseases like cancer, food silently takes lives at a snail's pace, leaving its victims unaware until it's too late.

In this section, we will uncover the veil of innocence that shrouds our meals and expose the true face of this world's slowest serial killer. Prepare to be shocked as we explore the hidden threats lurking in our food.

Consuming Death One Bite at a Time: An In-depth Analysis of Food-related Deaths

Food-related deaths may seem like a rare occurrence, but the reality is far from that. Every year, countless lives are lost due to the hidden dangers lurking in our meals. From contaminated produce to contaminated meat, our food supply is riddled with hazards that can have fatal consequences. In this section, we will take a closer look at the different types of food-related deaths and the alarming statistics behind them.

One of the main culprits behind food-related deaths is foodborne illnesses. These illnesses can be caused by various bacteria, viruses, and parasites that contaminate our food. The symptoms may range from mild stomach discomfort to severe illness and, in some cases, death. Understanding the different types of foodborne illnesses and the ways in which they can be prevented is crucial in reducing the number of deaths caused by them.

Another factor that contributes to food-related deaths is the presence of toxins in our food. Pesticides, heavy metals, and other chemical contaminants can find their way into our meals and wreak havoc on our health. Over time, these toxins can accumulate in our bodies, leading to chronic illnesses and, in some cases, death.

By analyzing the various factors that contribute to food-related deaths, we can gain a better understanding of the magnitude of this issue and the steps we need to take to protect ourselves. From proper food handling and preparation to advocating for stricter food safety regulations, there are many ways in which we can prevent the consumption of death one bite at a time.

"Faster" Than Cancer: A Comparative Look at Food-borne Diseases and Cancer Fatalities

When we think of deadly diseases, cancer is often at the top of the list. However, what if I told you that food-borne diseases actually claim more lives than cancer? It may seem hard to believe, but the statistics don't lie. Food-borne diseases, caused by contaminated food, pose a greater threat to our health than cancer. While cancer can strike quickly and aggressively, food-borne illnesses have a slower, more insidious impact.

What makes this comparison even more startling is that food-borne diseases are preventable. By practicing proper food safety measures, such as washing hands, cooking food thoroughly, and storing it correctly, we can significantly reduce the risk of falling victim to this silent killer. The key is awareness and education.

In this section, we will delve into the numbers and explore the stark reality of food-borne diseases compared to cancer fatalities. Prepare to be shocked by the alarming statistics that highlight the true extent of this hidden danger.

Prevention is Better Than Cure: Ways to Protect Ourselves From The Silent Killer

When it comes to the silent killer that lurks in our food, prevention is truly better than cure. While it may seem daunting to think about all the potential dangers that could be hidden in our meals, there are steps we can take to protect ourselves and minimize the risk.

First and foremost, proper food handling and preparation are key. Washing fruits and vegetables thoroughly, cooking meats to the appropriate temperature, and avoiding cross-contamination can go a long way in preventing foodborne illnesses.

Another important aspect of prevention is staying informed. Keeping up-to-date with food recalls and safety alerts can help us avoid consuming potentially hazardous foods. Additionally, staying educated on the proper storage and expiration dates of food products can further reduce the risk of contamination.

Advocating for stricter food safety regulations is also crucial in preventing the silent killer. By supporting policies that ensure proper food inspection, labeling, and enforcement, we can hold food manufacturers and suppliers accountable for providing safe products.

In conclusion, protecting ourselves from the hidden threat in our food requires a proactive approach. By practicing safe food handling, staying informed, and advocating for stricter regulations, we can minimize the risk of falling victim to the slowest serial killer: our meals.

[khulkarjiyo]

Is bread a processed food - 3 Benefits and 3 Side effects

Hello friends, bread is mainly consumed in breakfast in almost all homes, so are they good for our health, do we not get harmed by using them? And one of the biggest question is whether bread is processed food or not and how should we consume it. So that our health does not deteriorate, then in this post, today we will know about bread, how beneficial and how bad it is. Is Bread Processed…

[infomatic-93]

“Sprouted moong Dal” removes diseases in winter| Ankurit Dal ke Health Benefits | Super Food

[piplupod]

searchengine dot com clicks search bar typing "how do i make peace with the fact that i am living a life that is the situation i was terrified of ending up in as a kid. how do i make peace with the fact that my younger self would've killed themself if they saw where we are now because the only reason they stayed alive was for a dream that has been relatively recently rendered impossible forever. how do i continue to pretend that i am just the same as everyone else and a-okay when i feel like i need to scream for help nearly constantly. how do i make peace with a situation that makes me feel nauseous to simply think about and remember i exist in."

[mixelation]

man every single post about nutrition on this website and also every other website is wrong, possibly even including this one. calories are not "bad," because food has no moral value and the goal of eating is to fuel your body, not to achieve moral superiority via hoping to conform to your local beauty standards.... but i'm baffled by how often people on here boldly claim that it doesn't "matter" what food you're getting your fuel from? calories are a unit of measurement of energy your body can extract from nutrients, and because your body does not process all nutrients the same, it does actually "matter" which calories you are eating in that your body will do different things with them. they are only "all the same" in that eating meals is better than not eating meals

but also no i will not go further because no one has ever once been normal about the science behind how different things get metabolized and finding sources is the most frustrating thing in the entire world

[hyunrun]

tw ed in the tags !!

[rainyfestivalsweets]

OMG, this is a Must Watch!

The good industry is dirty- Kiana is talking about it and bringing forth amazing points!

Let's talk about it!!

Fast food is $$$$.

She points out that fast food prices, often blamed on inflation have risen higher and faster than inflation actually has. AND most chains have discontinued healthier options, like chicken breast and/or a simple salad.

The Pivot to target Ozempic Users

That's right! A food company giant is pivoting to target Ozempic and Wegovy users with ultra processed foods like pizza and pasta... with "higher" protein.

The truth bombs Continue....

One author is found to be PAID by huge companies... to blast back against the ANTI UPF book published last year....

If you need a reason to stop eating crap- this is it. These companies KNOW they are unhealthy. They know. And will continue as long as their profit margin remains.

Time to drive them bankrupt.

BANKRUPT

Like Dodgeball says "You gotta get angry! You gotta get mean!"

[samwisefamgee]

the way some of the neurotypical/wealthy folk I know make living look so easy yet make being look so fucking hard

[ughirant]

Warning: long rant.

I'm catching up on episodes and I can't even be mad at Trina during the bar fight ep...yes some of the things she said are an overaction but I think she's just tired. Now I disagree with her going so hard for Joss in damn near every scene and we don't ever see Joss even talk about Trina outside of scenes they have together? I also don't think Spencer's been selfish or entitled whoever said she was just projecting was right. However, him lying about the evidence? When he literally could've just told her "Hey I hear you but I disagree, I say we keep it until we find the real evidence." Obviously, she'd be a little upset but I think Trina can be understanding.

Also, Portia trying to push Spencer and Esme together knowing that would hurt her daughter? Why??? I'm all for making Portia the villain for drama but do they believe she could come back from this? Or be redeemable in some way?

I'm watching clips because I can't with the full episodes right now but the whole Esme walking in on Spencer and him opening up to her...why? and a few people in the comments on Youtube are talking about how it has nothing to do with Trina being a Black woman and mentioning how TJ and Molly don't get anything either; like I said I haven't been watching full episodes for long so forgive my ignorance, but Trina and Spencer just had a major arc?? and afterward it's nothing? Media has a long history of making Black women suffer through being an 'at the moment' girlfriend and then fading to the background when the white woman they were meant to be with finally comes around. And I don't think they're comparable (again correct me if I'm wrong) because TJ and Molly are in love and in love proudly? We get moments of them kissing and hugging and having deeper discussions. With Trina and Spencer, we're holding our breaths hoping that they get a moment alone, or a kiss, or even a hug. All we get are lingering stares and small gestures, and I'm all for slow burns but it's giving period piece with how sloooow. They haven't even said I love you (directly) to each other. It's so frustrating when this couple has garnered new viewership for the show for them to be treated like this.

Someone also mentioned in the Youtube comments, "It's a soap there's gonna be drama."...I feel like people are being purposefully obtuse. Of course, there's going to be drama; but how come Joss and Dex have drama that, yes, has affected them but not torn them apart? it feels like where Sprina is right now they're not growing together at all? Which is crazy because they just went through this hugely traumatic experience together. As soon as they got off the Haunted Star Portia said "This just brought them closer." and it did for that episode and Curtis' birthday episode (which we got all of 20 seconds of them being 'close') since then? Crickets. They almost watched each other die, multiple times and besides the talk on the plane, they haven't really spoken about it? They're so young you'd think that they would've had an emotional conversation about it and how scary it was?

But I digress..

[suzilight]

Sucralose aka Splenda Is Genotoxic | June 2023

Me: Big Food sells us low quality at high prices that makes us gradually sicker then Big Pharma sells us high priced meds to control the symptoms until we need Big Hospital and a funeral. Think I'm exaggerating? Read on.

"When we exposed sucralose and sucralose-6-acetate to gut epithelial tissues—the tissue that lines your gut wall—we found that both chemicals cause 'leaky gut.' Basically, they make the wall of the gut more permeable. The chemicals damage the 'tight junctions,' or interfaces, where cells in the gut wall connect to each other.

"A leaky gut is problematic, because it means that things that would normally be flushed out of the body in feces are instead leaking out of the gut and being absorbed into the bloodstream."

"We found that gut cells exposed to sucralose-6-acetate had increased activity in genes related to oxidative stress, inflammation and carcinogenicity,"

"To put this in context, the European Food Safety Authority has a threshold of toxicological concern for all genotoxic substances of 0.15 micrograms per person per day," Schiffman says. "Our work suggests that the trace amounts of sucralose-6-acetate in a single, daily sucralose-sweetened drink exceed that threshold. And that's not even accounting for the amount of sucralose-6-acetate produced as metabolites after people consume sucralose."

Harvard says: "Some studies show that leaky gut may be associated with other autoimmune diseases (lupus, type 1 diabetes, multiple sclerosis), chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, arthritis, allergies, asthma, acne, obesity, and even mental illness." 

Splenda.com says: "Today, the Splenda brand is the most recognizable and iconic low-calorie sweetener brand in the world, having sold more than 100 billion yellow packets since its launch in 1992."

Michael Zeece, in Introduction to the Chemistry of Food, 2020 says: "Granulated sucralose is mixed with fillers to provide a measure for measure substitution with table sugar (sucrose). The powdered form of sucralose contains 90% bulking agents such as maltodextrin, that are a metabolizable form of carbohydrate. A 50/50 mixture of sucrose and sucralose, plus a bulking agent, is available for baking applications. This mixture reduces caloric content and enables browning reactions in baking applications."  Source

Me: Wow. Ok. 50/50 sugar/Splenda plus bulking agents for baking. Would that mean commercial baking? Processed foods? YES!!!

"Sucralose is also highly stable at elevated temperatures that are often used in food, beverage, and drug manufacturing processes so that product sweetness levels can be maintained following cooking, baking, and/or pasteurization. Sucralose also has excellent stability in low-pH products so that sweetness degradation is not a determining factor in the shelf-life of such products."

FDA says "Sucralose is a general-purpose sweetener found in various foods, including baked goods, beverages, chewing gum, gelatins, and frozen dairy desserts." 

By weight, Sucralose is about 600 times sweeter than sucrose (sugar).

 Me: Even if I don't buy or use Splenda or drink diet sodas there is a good chance that I'm still eating more than 0.15 micrograms of sucralose in "shelf stable" cookies, pastries, bread or ice cream. Big Food cuts in Sucralose/Splenda because it gives big sweetness and probably costs less than natural sugar/sucrose.

The FDA approved it for general use in 1999. They suggest it for diabetic people! No wonder Celiac Disease, Crohn's disease, and irritable bowel syndrome have steadily increased.

Never mind the Leaky Gut diseases or the malignant tumors, Splenda is calorie-free. /facepalm

[fatnutswizard]

I'm culturally cut off from my ancestors so i choose to honor them (anger them) by preparing and eating my own food in ways that make people yell at me about "germs", "food poisoning", "acting like a cockroach", and other such frivolities

[no-te-lo-voy-a-dar]

just had the chance of standing in front of a full, clean full body mirror and percieve myself while trying some clothes that looked fantastic on my head and be disappointed by how they actually looked on me lmao - I'm too small in any way to fill up the clothes i actually like

maybe i dress like a teenage boy because those are the clothes that fit me (8

[hanaenas]

food isn't evil. carrots don't have too much sugar, fruits are good, butter is heaven. just eat, our ancestors made it work

[fourohfourlifenotfound]

Having a tree nut allergy while also trying to find baking recipes on pinterest:

Two ingredient nutella cookies recipe!

*swipe*

VEGAN CAKE RECIPE (I USE ALMOND MILK)

*swipe*

Hey guys today we're going to be making these decadent brownies *halfway through* and now you add your nutella~

[oneshortdamnfuse]

One of many pieces of information rarely discussed that has stuck with me in studying the Holocaust in a literacy class is that people who survived the death camps often did not survive starvation. It is very difficult for a severely malnourished body to recover from starvation. A severely malnourished body will struggle to process food at all, and many people die in the process of “refeeding.” This is called refeeding syndrome for this reason. Reintroducing food can and often is fatal without careful, medical guidance.

Starvation is one of the most common and effective forms of genocide. What makes it effective is that past a certain point, even if aid has been delivered, it is not enough to save someone from death by starvation. What also makes it effective is that withholding food is viewed as a passive consequence of political turmoil rather than an intentional act of violence among a people. You will see more people die from starvation in genocides across history because it is an effective way to kill many people without the use of state resources.

The starvation of Gaza is intentional. The United States and Israel may gesture that they are delivering or allowing aid into Gaza, but in reality they are active participants in the starvation of Gaza by destroying medical infrastructure, limiting the amount of aid “allowed” in, and blocking aid trucks from entering. Throwing food into Gaza by airdrop at this point in the genocide will not be enough without medical infrastructure to refeed a severely malnourished population. Many will die anyways. Many have already.

[medicinemane]

Man I hate tomatoes, but what I really hate is how people are like "hear you loud and clear" and then hand me tomato stuff