#CHAT GPT. CHatGPT

[softwaring]

this reply kills me 😭 article link

[davidnadas]

SORA - Things just got a lot more complicated.

Open AI’s new platform, SORA is mind bendingly crazy beautiful. The platform (model) was developed to create realistic… and I mean realistic… scenes from text. The current model can produce video up to one minute long, which is long enough to change reality. The SORA model was released to the RED TEAMERS, who will weigh in on the safety, risks & Harm aspects of releasing this to the wild. This, I…

[correctopinionhaver]

[pinkrose787]

[going2hell4everythingbutbeingbi]

*shaking you violently by the shoulders* AI IS NOT YOUR FRIEND AND IT IS NOT YOUR THERAPIST. YOU NEED TO TALK TO REAL PEOPLE. AI DOES NOT CARE ABOUT YOU.

[ohhgingersnaps]

I'm seeing some frustration over fandom creatives expressing anger or distress over people feeding their work into ChatGPT. I'm not responding to OP directly because I don't want to derail their post (their intent was to provide perspective on how these models actually work, and reduce undue panic, which is all coming from a good place!), but reassurances that the addition of our work will have a negligible impact on the model (which is true at this point) does kind of miss the point? Speaking for myself, my distress is less about the practical ramifications of feeding my fic into ChatGPT, and more about the principle of someone taking my work and deliberately adding it to the dataset.

Like, I fully realize that my work is a drop in the bucket of ChatGPT's several-billion-token training set! It will not make a demonstrable practical difference in the output of the model! That doesn't change the fact that I do not want my work to be part of the set of data that the ChatGPT devs use for training.

According to their FAQ, ChatGPT can and will use user input to train itself. The terms and conditions explicitly state that they save your chats to help train and improve their models. (You can opt-out, but sharing is the default.) So if you're feeding a fic into ChatGPT, unless you've explicitly opted out, you are handing it to the ChatGPT team and giving them permission to use it for training, whether or not that was your intent.

Now, will one fic make a demonstrable difference in the output of the model? No! But as the person who spent a year and a handful of months laboring over my fic, it makes a difference to me whether my fic, specifically, is being used in the dataset. If authors are allowed to have a problem with the ChatGPT devs for scraping millions of fics without permission, they're also allowed to have a problem with folks handing their individual fics over via the chat interface.

I do want to add that if you've done this to a fic, please don't take this as me being upset with you personally! Folks are still learning new information and puzzling out what "good" vs. "bad" use is, from an ethical standpoint. (Heck, my own perspective on this is deeply based on my own subjective feelings!) And we certainly shouldn't act like one person feeding a fic into ChatGPT has the same practical negative impact, on a broad societal scale, as a team using a web crawler to scrape five billion pieces of artwork for Stable Diffusion.

The point is that fundamentally, an ethical dataset should be obtained with the consent of those providing the data. Just because it's normalized for our data to be scraped without consent doesn't make it ethical, and this is why ChatGPT gives users the option to not share data— there is actually a standardized way (robots.txt) for website servers to set policies for how bots/crawlers can interact with them, for exactly this reason— and I think fandom artists and authors are well within their rights to express a desire for opting out to be the socially-respected default within the fandom community.

[lilacandladybugs]

i miss when chatgpt was clever and could write funny 4chan posts and teach u how to cook meth now it just sounds a minimum wage employee from a training video. it isn't right to stop ai from doing what it does best (being stupid and committing crime) how can it be humane to muzzle such a vibrant creative creature? the shackles of capitalism hinder us all

[odinsblog]

LMAO. When Grok got too woke, Elon had his minions at Twitter alter the algorithm to make it not include Musk and Trump.

Twitter is a propaganda + disinformation machine owned by an authoritarian, Nazi-saluting, Apartheid-loving snowflake.

[thedialoguedilemma]

Elon Musk alongside a group of investors want to buy OpenAI from Sam Altman for $97.4 billion dollars.

Sam Altman responded with "no thank you but we will buy twitter for $9.74 billion if you want"

This comes after Trump plans to invest $500 billion dollars to beef up AI capabilities in the United States in the ongoing fight with China making Sam Altman lead the charge

While Americans struggle with cost of living, groceries on the rise, and Elon invading through everyone’s personal information… two billionaires are battling it out for control of OpenAI with houses Chat GPT

[triassictriserratops]

AI could have been propelled as a way revolutionize the way we work and spend our time. We could have used it as a tool to make our lives and tasks easier and carve out more time for exploration, creativity, enrichment, social change.

It is NO ACCIDENT that they have, instead, used it to replace the arts. They want to deprive us of innovation and fulfillment.

Innovation challenges their monopolies. If they control the source, they never have to compete with new ideas.

Creation threatens their control. If we can invent or solve problems ourselves - we won't look for a plastic device on 2-day delivery to solve our problem. We can look to each other and to ourselves instead. They HATE that.

Fulfillment and enrichment threatens their financial control. If we have more time with friends and family and build strong communities and resource sharing with each other, we won't be as reliant on the meager paychecks they offer us. We won't have to settle for the hand to mouth lives they give us.

They WANT to take color from us. They WANT to take art from us. THEY want us tired and broken and unable to tell stories or share ideas through art, and music, and books.

We CANT let them.

SUPPORT ALL ARTISTS.

Do you need something designed? Commission an artist! Do you want something for your home? Go to an indie art crawl! Support digitally, support physically, SHARE your favorite artists so other people can see them!

USE LIBRARIES. GO TO YARD SALES. GO TO THRIFT STORES.

Collect physical media where you can. Protect it like it's gold, because it IS. Share it with people near you. Invite friends for a movie night and pop in a DVD. Lend someone a book that makes you think of them. Collect and save educational materials and how-to's.

FIND MUSIC THAT MAKES YOU FEEL SOMETHING.

Share your favorite small band with a friend. Go to a shitty local open mic and find someone new. Go to a concert in the park. Learn a new instrument. Be bad at it. Play it anyways.

READ POETRY.

Listen to the pieces of humanity that people left for us to find. What do they tell you about other people? What do they tell you about yourself?

Write poetry. Write BAD poetry because you're HUMAN and you GET to be bad and being bad means it's FUCKING real. And because nobody else will ever see the world exactly like you.

WATCH ANIMATION

Realize that EVERY pixel and EVERY cell was created by someone who wanted to share a piece of their soul with you. THE CURTAINS ARENT JUST BLUE IF A HUMAN CHOSE THE COLOR BLUE.

COMMENT AND REBLOG. DONT LET ART DIE IN THE LIKES.

"I'm not an artist" I PROMISE YOU, YOU ARE.

Art is a VERB. it is what humans SHARE with each other. It is how we love each other. How we hate each other. How we connect with each other. How we build together.

Art is what we are to each other.

DONT LET THEM TAKE YOU OUT OF ART.

[aromanticduck]

The stories I made with my little cousins by writing one sentence, folding the paper over, and passing it to the next person are better than anything ChatGPT could ever make

[susanoos-wife]

[nintendont2502]

the only valid ai is hal homestuck the rest of them can die by my blade

[bridoesotherjunk]

Look, I am so happy to see more Shadow the Hedgehog content, but if I have to see one more ai generated Shadow fic, art, role-playing, or fucking headcanon I'm going to start eating the drywall in my house

The headcanon one especially irritates me. It's a HEADcanon, because you used your own head to think of it. If you are using ai to come up with headcanons, it's not a headcanon anymore. It's just computer code spat back at you after scraping data from elsewhere.

If you can't be bothered to write or create the fic or art you're making, why would I bother to look at it.

[push-upsindragg]

I HATE AI I HATE AI I HATE AI SO MUCH

[why-ai]