#ai code

[brookszd]

Hugging Face DeepSite coder

Hugging Face DeepSite coder() is an AI coding tool powered By Deepseek V3 latest version that helps you create websites and web applications without coding knowledge. Get real-time previews, SEO optimization, and rapid deployment with DeepSite's powerful platform. DeepSite is an advanced AI-powered website generator that helps users build websites effortlessly. With just a simple description, DeepSite generates production-ready websites with clean code and professional design—no programming skills required. The Hugging Face Advantage: Join the revolution in AI-powered web development. DeepSite combines Hugging Face's trusted infrastructure with DeepSeek V3's superior intelligence – a combination that delivers exceptional results every time.

[aiweirdness]

“Slopsquatting” in a nutshell:

1. LLM-generated code tries to run code from online software packages. Which is normal, that’s how you get math packages and stuff but

2. The packages don’t exist. Which would normally cause an error but

3. Nefarious people have made malware under the package names that LLMs make up most often. So

4. Now the LLM code points to malware.

https://www.theregister.com/2025/04/12/ai_code_suggestions_sabotage_supply_chain/

[ezdant001]

Encuentros sexuales León Guanajuato México

477 700 5612

[rosieuv]

This comment I made on some video essay about AI because I like researching about how fucked my future is

The thing with AI code is that you need to have some sort of an idea on what's coded so you can figure out bugs. I once saw this forum post on some coding website where someone auto-generated some code but it didn't work and they didn't know why. Now, programmers speak in this separate form of English that no non-programmer can understand, and also the difference between using AI and copying and pasting from Stack Overflow, is that a programmer takes that bit of code after they've typed out the specific function they're tying to code but needs help trying to figure out what command it is, and has somewhat of an understanding on what the code reads. Using AI is like a non-programmer looking into inspect mode on a website and trying to modify it despite having no idea how to because you haven't developed a programmer's brain.

Not to mention it's obvious that they didn't type it out as their post is something bare bones like:

"Why won't the character move right"

and not

"I followed a tutorial to add 3D movement onto this KinematicBody node, however I changed the velocity variable in this script right here and now the KinematicBody refuses to increase it's X axis. I've added print statements on line 5 and 23 and the KinematicBody can decrease it's X axis but seems to automatically go back to the value 5 whenever it tries to increase. I think it's due to the Position node in the Camera node but I'm not too sure as I ripped that from some 10 year old Reddit post. How do I get the Position node to allow the KinematicBody node to increase it's X axis so the character can move right? I'm using Software Name version bla bla bla on specific Linux OS version with 16GB of RAM and 512GB of SSD storage and 3 monitors and a wireless mouse and a mechanical keyboard with rainbow LED lights that glow in the dark."

And that's just the beginners! Even I can't understand what professional programmers say on their forums. But can you see how actually learning how to code gives you this skill that makes it so you can understand what everything does (mostly) because you're sure as hell not getting an answer with the former as the second somebody asks in the replies to add print statements to figure out the order the code is running, these AI bros will faint.

Here's the video btw just to put it into context (very informative would recommend):

[smartsyncer]

The Role of Educational Robots in Modern Learning

robotics stem education

robotics stem education Educational robots are transforming modern learning by enhancing engagement, collaboration, and hands-on experience in STEM (Science, Technology, …

[zerodimensionsworld]

ai code assistant

Composio is an innovative AI-powered code assistant designed to streamline and enhance the software development process. By leveraging advanced machine learning algorithms, Composio analyzes code structures, identifies patterns, and provides intelligent suggestions for optimizing efficiency and quality.

[shepscapades]

Surely this will have no negative consequences whatsoever!

[mysocial8onetech]

Are you looking for a code generation system that can generate, execute, and refine code based on your natural language inputs? Look no further than OpenCodeInterpreter, the open-source code system that leverages Code-Feedback, a novel dataset of human-code interactions, to produce high-quality and reliable code. Check out our article to find out more.

[teledyn]

About that AI code you got…

This could be good (if anyone cares)

If AI art is public domain, that's fine anyone can use it in whole or in part, but CODE used to train their bot will very likely contain code licensed with a GNU Public License, which REQUIRES the containing product to also be GPL… as will be all future code CONTAINING that code!

Have we discovered something brutally effective?!

These days, given copilot etc, increasingly it will be highly unlikely any given piece of code did not contain any AI generates, and therefore itself be GPL, and thus that day approaches when, in this regard at least, Richard Stallman finally wins?

[aihallofshame]

Is AI Entitled to Open Source Code?

GitHub hauled into court over accusations that its CoPilot AI product scraped people's protected work without permission for training material, then tried to hide it

[ask-the-rag-dolly]

anyways good episode

[jaynemcinnes1975blog]

[smartsyncer]

A definitive Manual for Wellbeing, Wellness, and Diet Arranging

Wellbeing, Wellness, and Diet Arranging

Wellbeing, Wellness, and Diet Arranging It requires a methodology which incorporates customary activity, an arranged out diet, and a solid …

Wellbeing, Wellness, and Diet Arranging

[sreegs]

the past few years, every software developer that has extensive experience, and knows what they're talking about, has had pretty much the same opinion on LLM code assistants: they're OK for some tasks but generally shit. Having something that automates code writing is not new. Codegen before AI were scripts that generated code that you have to write for a task, but is so repetitive it's a genuine time saver to have a script do it.

this is largely the best that LLMs can do with code, but they're still not as good as a simple script because of the inherently unreliable nature of LLMs being a big honkin statistical model and not a purpose-built machine.

none of the senior devs that say this are out there shouting on the rooftops that LLMs are evil and they're going to replace us. because we've been through this concept so many times over many years. Automation does not eliminate coding jobs, it saves time to focus on other work.

the one thing I wish senior devs would warn newbies is that you should not rely on LLMs for anything substantial. you should definitely not use it as a learning tool. it will hinder you in the long run because you don't practice the eternally useful skill of "reading things and experimenting until you figure it out". You will never stop reading things and experimenting until you figure it out. Senior devs may have more institutional knowledge and better instincts but they still encounter things that are new to them and they trip through it like a newbie would. this is called "practice" and you need it to learn things