Tumgik
#anyway. my answer to the poll:
nonuel · 2 months
Text
mass effect fandom typically has no problem disregarding or rewriting portions of canon, but one thing i have almost never seen touched is the friendship between garrus and shepard. so here is a poll because i am genuinely curious. i tried to be as expansive as poll limitations allowed, but since we are already throwing out canon i recognize there are a lot of variances that haven't been included. because of that, i would particularly like it if people elaborated about their non-romantic relationship with garrus in the tags, comments, or reblogs - especially if you are someone who has voted for any of the non-friend options. thanks for your time!
this post is not meant to be garrus critical. garrus enjoyers are welcome to participate in the poll, i only ask that you are respectful toward other people who may not have him as their favorite, or who may just simply roleplay a shepard that does not have him as their (best) friend for whatever reason.
102 notes · View notes
nickandros · 6 months
Text
+ put in the tags where you're from
1K notes · View notes
Text
do you guys think that part of the reason Gideon’s death was so devastating to Harrow was that before then, there had at least been one person who survived the mass murder that created her? two hundred souls had been destroyed for her sake, but the annihilation wasn’t complete — there was one who escaped. one who lived. do you think Gideon dying, for the sake of Harrow living, snuffed out her one last glimmer of hope for absolution?
518 notes · View notes
poolpvrty · 6 days
Text
Tumblr media
Sirius Black as Dionysus; the god of wine, insanity, fertility, festivity, and theatre!
223 notes · View notes
an-albino-pinetree · 5 days
Text
Tumblr media
Holy shit back up-
173 notes · View notes
poetrysmackdown · 9 months
Note
what makes a poem a poem? does it have to be written in a certain way? is this question a poem if i want it to be?
Fun question! This is just my personal sense as an avid reader and less-avid writer of poetry, but for me it’s useful to distinguish (roughly) between poetry as a genre and poetry as an attitude or philosophy through which language and the world can be understood. And of course these two go hand in hand. I see poetry the genre as essentially a type of literature where we as readers are signaled, somehow, to pay closer attention to language, to rhythm, to sound, to syntax, to images, and to meaning. That attentive posture is the “attitude” of broader poetic thinking, and while it’s most commonly applied to appreciate work that’s been written for that purpose, there’s nothing stopping us from applying that attentiveness elsewhere. Everywhere, even! That’s how you eventually end up writing poetry for yourself, after all. There’s a quote from Mary Ruefle floating around on here that a lot of folks have probably already seen, but it immediately comes to mind with this ask:
“And when you think about it, poets always want us to be moved by something, until in the end, you begin to suspect that a poet is someone who is moved by everything, who just stands in front of the world and weeps and laughs and laughs and weeps.”
Similarly, after adopting the attentive posture of poetics, there’s plenty of things that can feel or sound like a poem, even when they perhaps were not written with that purpose in mind. I’ve seen a couple of these “found poems” on here that are quite fun—this one, for example. The meaning and enjoyment you may derive from the language of a found poem isn’t any less real than that derived from a poem written for explicitly poetic purposes, so I don’t see why it shouldn’t be called poetry.
That said, I do think that if you’re going to go out and start looking for poetry everywhere, it’s still important to have a foundation in the actual language work of it all. Now, this doesn’t mean it has to be “written in a certain way” at all! But it does mean that in order to cultivate the attentiveness that’s vital to poetry, one needs to understand what makes language tick, down at its most basic levels. It will make you better at reading poetry, better at writing it, and better at spotting it out in the wild.
Mary Oliver’s A Poetry Handbook is an extraordinary resource to new writers and readers, and a great read for more experienced folks as well. Mary Oliver’s most popular poems are all to my knowledge in free verse, and yet you might be surprised to find her deep appreciation for metrical verse (patterns of stressed/unstressed syllables), as well as for the most minute devices of sound. In discussing the so-called poetry of the past, she writes,
“Acquaintance with the main body of English poetry is absolutely essential—it is the whole cake, while what has been written in the last hundred years or so, without meter, is no more than an icing. And, indeed, I do not really mean an acquaintanceship—I mean an engrossed and able affinity with metrical verse. To be without this felt sensitivity to a poem as a structure of lines and rhythmic energy and repetitive sound is to be forever less equipped, less deft than the poet who dreams of making a new thing can afford to be.”
In another section, after devoting lots of attention to the sounds at work in Robert Frost’s “Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening”, she writes,
“Everything transcends from the confines of its initial meaning; it is not only the transcendence in meaning but the sound of the transcendence that enables it to work. With the wrong sounds, it could not have happened.”
I hope all this helps to get across my opinion that what makes a poem a poem is not just about the author's intention, and not just about meaning (intended or attributed), but also about sound and rhythm and language and history, all coalescing into something that rises above the din of a language we would otherwise grow tired of while out in our day-to-day lives.
I'll always have more to say but I'm cutting myself off here! Thanks for the ask
464 notes · View notes
danielnelsen · 9 months
Text
now go and choose your LEAST favourite
565 notes · View notes
misc-obeyme · 2 months
Note
simeon calling you "my little lamb" vs barbatos calling you "my sacrificial lamb" WHO WILL WIN
OKAY LISTEN HERE ANON. You can't just bring this into my ask box, don't you know I'm an indecisive bitch?
I honestly did not ever think of that as something Barbatos would say UNTIL HE SAID IT. And then I lost my mind about it. Definitely always expecting Simeon to call you his little lamb because I'm pretty sure he's done that but even if not it's precious and I also love it.
Though there is something specifically about the sacrificial part, you know what I'm saying? And having a demon say that to you... yeah I'm unhinged about it.
But oh sweet angel Simeon calling you his little lamb is really good, too. I can't decide!! Maybe I should do a poll lol. Let the fandom decide. I honestly think if either of them said either of those things to me in a bedroom setting, I would die on the spot.
144 notes · View notes
best-at-episode · 7 months
Text
I'm curious about the numbers if you discount those two, since they look up nearly 50% of the last version of this poll!
231 notes · View notes
claiborneart · 2 days
Text
You take the boat.
The boat rocks slightly as you step in, sending out gentle ripples across the waters.
You sit, and take the oar in your hand.
Tumblr media
You can see the horizon stretch out away from you, in every direction.
You feel the future open up, from the freedom and agency you've gained just now.
So, Kind Friends, let me ask you:
What do you do?
Tumblr media Tumblr media
78 notes · View notes
Text
You made it. You held onto life long enough to live to see the day a wizard in a tower somewhere enchants every human in the world to turn into an animal of their choosing for 24 hours, as long as that animal is native to the area the person lives. For this short time you are free. You get to be a critter with your buddies.
462 notes · View notes
majorshatterandhare · 6 months
Text
[Answer options in order are:
1. Yes, guitar, mandolin
2. Yes, piano/keyboard
3. Yes, violin, viola, cello, bass (inc. electric bass)
4. Yes, percussion
5. Yes, a woodwind
6. Yes, a brass instrument
7. Yes, multiple
8. Yes, something not mentioned here
9. No, I do not currently play an instrument but I sing
10. No, I do not currently play an instrument and I do not sing.
End Options]
Please specify in the comments or tags!
I’m sorry there aren’t more options, I only had 10 spaces or I would’ve included more. I tried to go with the most common and obviously with groups!
What counts for singing is up to you. I think most people sing some amount, but you can decide if yours counts or not. The reason for this is because you can teach yourself an instrument, so not requiring lessons or anything for either instruments or singing.
If you want to learn an instrument, especially if you don’t currently play any, I would love to know if you shared!
Please reblog! I wanna know how many of us play instuments ourselves and what that distribution is.
If you don’t listen to the Mechanisms don’t respond to this poll! I’m sure your answer is very interesting, but it will skew the results!
146 notes · View notes
pherre · 8 months
Text
write in for frank. he doesn't get his own poll option
257 notes · View notes
semiotomatics · 1 year
Text
470 notes · View notes
gaylactic-fire · 9 months
Text
If you don't like Zelink you don't need to announce it. Thog don't caare
172 notes · View notes
stuffedsand · 1 month
Text
Hi milgramblr questions guy is back
(try not to pick none, for my data's sake. None is there cuz t2s verdicts are more agreed on than t1 was)
There will be a second poll look out for that
EDIT: feel free to rb with reasonings!! I love seeing those
41 notes · View notes