Tumgik
#gay people arent real man
olvitier · 3 months
Text
Sorry its so late buf i am in an Edling mood tonight and I will never stop thinking about the idea of how theyre the epitome of right person wrong time.
(obviously in a context of like fandom shenannigans where canon events arent 100% set in stone like edling arent canon but also idc !! they are to me! im ignoring it let me be insane) ANYWAY
Even if they wanted to be together post promised day Ling has all the responsibilities of Xing and his clan and Edward would never hold him back from that for a second. Im of the opinion that brotherhood Edward feels a lot of guilt for wanting love from the people around him particularly those he sees as good (winry, alphonse, etc) especially if hes done things hes perceived as hurting them (maes’ death, the transmutation, etc etc). Which is why I think Edward connects with Ling so well cayse he doesnt carry the weight of a lot if his past mistakes, and then when the stone happens its like goddamn it i roped this guy into my shit again. Like i dont know Edward doesnt really dedicate himself so fully to people outside of winry and ed a lot so its interesting like!!
He cares about a lot of people like the majority of the allied cast and we see him be openly affectionate towards Nina and Hughes pre their deaths but I think Ling is the only person hes ever decided to stick with WITHOUT alphonse? I may be wrong but the whole sure Ill stay with you and trust my brother and Winry to stay safe and follow you around the outskirts of the east for a week till the promised day to protect my new friend is so??? what?? huh???
But anyone my point is post promised day Edward cant really ever see a future with Ling because of all the responsibility Ling holds outside of him and its veyr tragic imo like especially because in a different scenario if Ling didnt have those responsibilities and Edward wasn’t so dedicated to the people around him to a fault of never thinking about his own desires I think they could have the possibility of a future.
Like I have read a lot of fanfiction abiut Ed traveling to Xing and living with him there but?? I realistically cant see him ever doing that just solely because Edward is not the type of person to settle down! like its my one and only criticism of the fma manga is that I cannot see Edward ever being satisfied with a simple life? Like even in Fma 03 which is my favourite interpretation of Edwards character once he gets stranded in our world he learns?? Rocket Science?? For the chance to get back to Amestris but he doesnt really seem to take that goal all that seriously especially considered Alfons ends up getting involved in a lot more aircraft projects than Edward like Edwsrd genuinely enjoys learning!!
Im pretty sure he was the one who dragged Alphonse into Hoenhiems office when they were kids after he left, probably to Al’s reluctance of if they were allowed in there, and started ripping through all of his old books just to learn. Edward never stops and it gets so bad that he never stops to even consider himself constantly worrying about getting his brother back or improving the states of others lives especially when! ya know! the whole country is at stake!!
So in a circumstance post promised day where Ed decides what he wants to do (my personal favourite interpretation is either an alchemical researcher outside of directly performing alchemy, ie revolutionizing the circle matrixes and discovering nee combinations or becoming a professor of some kind) I dont think he would give that up to settle again. And obviously Ling cant exactly up and leave being Emperor unless he decides he doesnt want to, im not the most knowledgable on Lings characterization so I wont speak there but!
They have so much fun together and compliment each other and genuinely care about each other so much but their happiness and fulfillment as people to themselves and others make it so its nearly impossible they would ever realistically end up together and its really doomed and tragic!! idk i think about it a lot.
65 notes · View notes
vse-kar-vem · 4 months
Text
why are we having queerbaiting discourse as a fandom in the year of our lord 2024 😭😭 we're just as bad as twitter oh my god
#real people cant queerbait. jance arent queerbaiting bokris arent queerbaiting either .#we have no right to know their sexualities nor do they have any obligation to tell us before kissing a man. they could be fully straight#they could be playing gay chicken 24/7 (they are) and that still isnt queerbaiting !#what they choose to put in that photoshoot 'authentic' or not is their choice#its so stupid cuz like i thjnk its such a nothingburger of discourse 😭 neither of the ships at play here are in direct conflict with#each other#literally for everyone on both sides : dont like just block#i dont think anyone in this fandom has malintent or is tryinf to put any other members down on purpose#+ we all have our own preferences when it comes to shipping#also i think stuff thats getting said is getting so misinterpreted and magnified beyond original intent that its making everything such a#largwr deal than it is#anyways! my own personal gripe: related to my orher post#why are we babying grown men lord 😭 i would also LOVE a jannacejure photoshoot but im sure its not hurtful for tjem if they dont do it 😭#like theyre grown men not elementary schoolers who need to be told theyre special#sorry that was a little more confrontational! wow we have really descended into disxourse today havent we#what im trying to say is this: i have beloved mutuals on both 'sides' and hold no hard feelings at all we're all entitled to our opinions#and i think it's really stupid to be drawing lines in the sand like this around issues that dontt even matter#ok! im done#vee rambles#ok yeah ive gone back and read all the discourse and my conclusion remains the same. i thjnk some people are reading a leetol too much into#things#but i think both sides have valid points#whatever we shall take it as it comes
9 notes · View notes
infizero · 9 months
Text
every time i so much as think about that scene where light looks at porn magazines while scowling i go into hysterics its genuinely the funniest thing i've ever seen
#the funniest thing is is that i truly believe he thought he was being 100% convincing. that that's normal behavior for a completely straight#completely allosexual man#light is fucking awful and i hate him but also there's nuance to him. and sometimes i can get a little like. oh thinking about his life#before the series. specifically factoring in my headcanons about him being gay aroace and autistic and stuff. ppl have written some rlly#good fics surrounding those topics.... but yeah thats not even canon stuff but i dont care#anyways its not in a way of making excuses for how he is i just think it adds more to his character#hes total garbage but i think theres really interesting stuff with him when it comes to how he's.... VERY disconnected from others#just in general. he's like aware of how to act ''normal'' on like the most textbook surface level without being like. Aware enough to#be able to make it more convincing. and as ridiculous as it is i do see some of myself in him in that sense#also that person who said light and L is just autistic guy who's been masking his entire life vs autistic guy who's never masked in his#entire life. LITERALLY EXACTLY. genuinely perfect way to describe them they are both so similar when it comes to this#but the ways they go about it are very different. light has been playing the part of the perfect son his whole life. L doesnt try to change#himself for anyone and doesnt care when people think hes weird. both of them arent very socially aware and havent had any real friends#their whole lives. its such a fascinating parallel between them#i could go on a whole fucking thing about how light was pretending to be someone he's not around his family and at school and everything#long before he got the death note BUT. i wont. at least not right now#jesus christ how did i go from laughing about him with the magazine to this. my bad#derailed my own damn post. idk swagever#will say rq tho. watched a vid on youtube that pointed out how light expected his family to think nothing of the fact that he's gone to#such drastic measures to hide his diary when making the plan with hiding the death note which is like#that level of dedication would NOT be normal. so the fact that light expects his family to think nothing of it......#i mean you could read that as light just once again being socially unaware. but it could also imply that light's family kind of Knows#he's hiding something and just doesn't address it. (he's gay. im talking about him being gay)#the video also referenced this comic that i didnt rb cause the actual premise of it (lawlight wedding) is um.#not at all my kind of thing. BUT it was light describing himself as a house with a basement when his family sees him as a one story house#and i thought that was such a cool analogy#ANYWAYYYSSSS i need to go to bed. thanks if you read my ramblings#serena.txt#death note posting
12 notes · View notes
Text
just watched Taboo (Gohatto) that anon here was talkin bout and i get legal rights to talk about it on this blog because takeshi kitano (hirose) plays hijikata in the movie
#snap chats#LIKE THE ENTIRE TIME I JUST KEPT THINKING 'wait he looks really familiar'#lo and behold thats so funny#anyway What Did I Think Of The Movie#it was hilarious the shinsengumi are fucking SCRAMBLING because of this pretty boy#hijikata looking at everyone like 'kondo are you in love with him ??? SOJI are YOU in love with him?? INOUE??????'#everyone but himself smh he only got eyes for one man but we been knew#okita was peak with the Top Ten Homophobia moments i cant#bro said 'oh no i hate gay people but i love a good story'#AND THE WAY HE WAS LIKE 'hijikata you're gay for kondo tho arent you like you always get pissed when people talk to him'#ENOUGH the shinsengumi is full of homosexuals#yamazaki was prob my fave bro in this movie idk why. maybe its cause i also thought he was real handsome but dont look at me#oh but the Actual movie i should talk about right#i just felt bad for kano the whole time#like people keep lusting after him and he's just like 'please leave me be'#the whole time hiji suspects him and tashiro to be lovers but like#we don't get to see kano's feelings on the matter aside from him pulling a knife on tashiro after he tries to sleep with him#it feels like kano's feelings are pushed to the side the whole time actually#the only time we actually see him earnestly say he loves someone is about yamazaki#and of course yamazaki doesnt reciprocate- whole movie tbh is just the shinsengumi trying to get kano to Not Be Gay#but like he's not even doing anything it's the men around him that keep trying to make a move on bro#tho the film DOESS say takeda courted him for a bit ?? but the deets on that are vague- tho kano at least laughs about it so#im scratching my head about the ending of the movie too- i cant decide if okita kills kano or what#hijikata cutting down the cherry blossom tree makes me believe that's what happened but idk#ALSO i dont think they want him to be Not Gay because of strict homophobia but because.well it's causing a problem#not STRICTLY cause hes gay but its cause men are killing each other over him- Allegedly it aint confirmed if kano killed yuzawa or not#but SOMEONE tried to kill yamazaki so.#it was an ight movie tho i wasnt mad bout watchin it. if you're gonna watch it warnings for SA/dubious consent and casual homophobia
20 notes · View notes
lecliss · 10 months
Text
Started using hoyolab for the rewards you can get in hsr but my god it's baffling how people act on there. It's like I entered another dimension or something. People have to add disclaimers explaining what headcanons are and that they're not a threat and people are legit freaked out and disturbed by headcanoning sexualites like that's a disgusting invasive inappropriate foreign concept they've never heard of and I just saw someone get horribly bullied for editing official art of genshin characters so they would be black. Like. These people would not survive five seconds on Tumblr. It's like anti-Tumblr over there.
3 notes · View notes
blissfali · 1 year
Text
skifufd
#vent#ish#More like#as ive basically become non existent on twitter to the point where the tabs are just taking up deadspace on my pc#ive noticed.Twitter is an awful place for gay people#like i mean weve all known this before#but man when you SEE it for REAL#i didnt know what mspec lesbians were until i saw someone i followed had mspec lebsians dni in their bio#and im like Whats that#and then like. for months every other day id get thread retweeted after thhreaed#like Aghh why you cant say this word why this gay identity fucking sucks why this person is offensive to the lgbt community#and im just like MAN lgbt infighting is stupid right???#Like wow you guys are stupid im sorry!!!!#it really is that one post where we can be whatever fucking sexuality we want but if we go outside we’ll all get called a faggot#like people on twitter are more worried about who can and cannot say dyke or fag or queer than anything ever#its so damn toxic its actually disgusting#in trying to ‘purify’ the lgbt community twitter is actively sending it to shit#why are we fighting eachother lets all talk about dick or vagina or whatever the fucj#stop arguing about why queer is a slur and who can say if actually and#bi lesbians arent real and are a threat to the lesbians and need to be put down cause theyre taking away from the lesbians#Idfk man its just all so damn stupid#there comes a point when you dont even know what youre fighting for anymore#and i definitely got to that point one time or another#like i was hating on people i didnt even know existed#can we all just hang out. and eat pussy perhaps#‘bi lesbians are hurting the lesbian community!!!!’ lets all go to a gay bar and do shots
3 notes · View notes
soulreaper · 2 years
Text
i hate bi ace trappola and gay deuce spade. like you understand nothing at all and also your lgbt headcanons suck ass.
11 notes · View notes
officialspec · 3 months
Note
What do you think gay men are attracted to in men that they can’t be attracted to in women?
It can’t be anything about femininity or masculinity obviously. That’s both sexist, and cultural so can’t be what drives men-only attraction.
It can’t be anything about stated identity because someone could lie just as easily as they could tell the truth in such a statement, and it makes no sense because homosexuality and heterosexuality exists in other species with no stated identities. It’s not like other animals without gender are all pan.
Saying idk it’s the vibes or some indescribable trait men have that women can’t but “I can’t explain” is a nonanswer.
Soooooooo what is it? Or do you think any sexuality but bi/pan is just cultural performance or an identity rather than an inborn orientation?
- [ ]
first off i hate this ask and i think youre a freak. in any other world i wouldve blocked you for this but unfortunately for both of us i actually like this type of philosophy. dont send this shit to anyone else though
i dont think its right to compare human sexuality to the same thing in animals, to get that out of the way. im sure until a certain point it comes from the same biological impulses, but human beings have way more complicated social structures and reasons for coupling that just do not exist in other animals. our social behaviours are what make us unique in the animal kingdom and that definitely extends to gender and sexuality. so theres that
people love to tout 'gender is a social construct' around like its a criticism in and of itself, which i think betrays a misunderstanding about social constructs in general. theyre the foundations we build language on to better understand each other, and affected by a whole host of cultural and historical factors. just because theyre subjective and complicated doesnt mean they arent real. in terms of the effect they have on peoples lives they may be the most real thing that exists
for example, 'kindness' is a social construct. the definition and ways it is enacted differ greatly across personal and cultural lines. but no one would ever suggest a world where kindness doesnt exist or loses meaning, because its an essential part of the way we interact with each other (in the same way i dont really see a world where gender entirely ceases to exist, mainly just one where people have more fun with it. im not a psychic though so who knows)
similarly, sexuality in humans is another social construct. i think the driving biological forces behind it are very real, but the labels people attach to those impulses are subjective attempts to express their inner world to the people around them if that makes sense. and those same biological impulses are ALSO subject to social ideas of gender, because those ideas are established at birth and reinforced over a persons entire lifetime
to use myself as an example, im a gay trans man. ive identified as other things in the past, because i was trying to pick apart feelings i had and express them to others in an attempt to find community. my identity might change as i get older and experience new things, or it might not. i identify as gay because im not attracted to the social concept of women, and someone i would otherwise be attracted to might lose all appeal after i find out they fall under that concept (this has happened before w transfems pre and post coming out lol)
of course, the real REAL answer to this is that trying to give queer identities rigid and objective definitions is a fools errand, and also lame as fuck. someone might identify as gay and be more attracted to general masculinity than men as a social category, maybe they fool around with a couple of butch women without considering themself any less gay. two otherwise identical people might be a butch lesbian and a gay trans man without either of those identities coming into conflict. they might even be the same person at different times of the week
the labels people choose to use are communication tools, not objective signifiers. if you dont understand them, they probably arent talking to you
social constructs are everything. we as humans have the unique ability to interpret our own messy desires and impulses into words that other people can use to form an idea of someone else in their mind. its how we build connections, and of course it isnt perfect because trying to squeeze someones entire personal history and the centuries of context that defined it into a handful of syllables is going to leave some room for error. but its all we have, yknow? so we keep trying. and i think thats much more human than any imposed objective 'truth' could ever be
tldr we live in a society dipshit. get with it
176 notes · View notes
joyboyish · 4 months
Text
okok i saw someone talk about how they dont like zolu (which if u dont idc) but it came down to a mass mischaracterization of zoro, luffy, and sanji so i wanted to talk about it
note that the person i saw was a zosan shipper but im not at all saying zolu is better than zosan or that zosan sucks (also sorry if this comes off rude im autistic LOL)
"zolu doesnt work because luffy is aro ace!"
im aspec, but you guys need to realize asexuality and aromanticism is a spectrum. for example: someone whos demisexual would only have romantic/sexual feelings if they already have a close bond with that person. using luffys aromanticism as an excuse to why zolu doesnt work is. weird. aspec people already dont get a lot of rep, but boiling it down to one definition isnt what we are
"if you ship zolu its because of the one piece live action! they straight washed sanji!"
ok this one kind of pissed me off bc😭..... none of the strawhats are canonically queer. you can def hc someone as gay, bi, lesbian, etc. but until oda says something is canon it isnt. for example, i hc zoro as gay and sanji as bi! but neither of these are canon. sanji wasnt straight washed, his characterization is very similar to the animanga, same as the other characters. the only real difference is they toned down a lot of things they werent able to do bc its not animation
"it feels cishet female gaze-y!"
zolu, arguably, has one of the most complex dynamics in the show. zoro has completely dedicated himself to luffy and luffy has pushed him to accomplish his dream. zoro sacrificed himself in thriller bark, giving up his dream, and promise to kuina, and nearly died in the process. zoros unwavering loyalty in luffy and luffys unwavering trust in zoro is part of the main appeal. im not a cishet female, so its probably why most of this got me upset, but i myself hc them both as aspec, and that they arent very sexual people. i wouldnt necessarily call either "female gaze-y" since the male gaze is a product of the patriarchy and the female gaze is more in a "how does this man treat a woman" way but yeah.
if u disagree w me thats ok! u can block me or send me an ask explaining why u prefer zoro and sanjis dynamic! its just not for me! i just think throwing around baseless accusations like straight washing or fetishization is weird
ok bye sorry
134 notes · View notes
roadhogsbigbelly · 4 months
Text
people on stan twitter are being really weird and cruel to a kind of obnoxious effeminate gay man because they don't like his thirst traps (as usual) and someone commented "it's really messed up how often you guys drag and humiliate this man for simply being openly fem and not conventionally attractive" and instantly a bunch a bad faith trolls with who have pictures of female celebrities as icons instead of their real face went "oh so you admit he's ugly" and "imagine defending someone by saying their not conventionally attractive" and like while i can't say noone has ever used "not conventionally attractive" as a nice code word for ugly" for the most part weather or not someone is "conventionally attractive" has very little to do with weather or not the person saying it thinks those traits are attractive or not. for instance i think fat people are extremely hot but i would still argue that they arent' "conventually attractive" because society at large has decided that being fat is ugly and people often still jump to weight as something to signal evilness because "attractiveness equals morality". someone saying "you guys are being cruel to this person because you think their ugly" is not secretly an agreement that the person is ugly you guys are just assholes
106 notes · View notes
moonshynecybin · 3 months
Note
I just saw your post about vale and Marc out with friends in the fco au and you said they hadn’t slept together since the photos, at what point in this universe do they sleep together again?
if we check the lovely timeline that bestie @kingofthering made we can actually assign the EXACT date of july 1, 2016... right after the their date to a fancy gala in paris.... which is a level of specificity i DO find funny. like pencil that in my guys. tarps off lets go.
but: to enter my mind palace!!!! essentially. to set the stage as it were. marc spends the preceding weeks to their gala date going absolutely ham on the gay chicken of it all... letting his freak flag fly. he is OVER being sad about this (he is. so sad lol) and has decided well. if im going to have to pretend to be dating the man that broke my heart that im still in love with. i AM at least going to shamelessly take advantage of this situation. like a true slut <3 and basically he finds escalating excuses to have category 5 PDA events with vale. again: it is jogging across the paddock to neck after a podium. it is tucking himself under vale's arm ANY chance he gets with the most smug little twink face on. looking up at him under his lashes. shirtless vacation pics on vale's yacht where he spends a LOT of time doing a corny silhouette sunset kiss pics but he keeps forgetting to take the pic because his tongue is physically in vale's mouth. and at the beginning vale WAS initially like. damn marc's not engaging with the acting part of this :( and NOW hes just soooo confused and horny bc marc is SENDINGGGGG IT. two steps from dry humping and absolutely obsessed... wet dreams level 5000. marc looking at vale like what? this is what we're supposed to do :) (HE IS HEARTBROKEN!!!!) so all of that is going on pre-gala. they are KEYED UP lmao
and then they have a lovely date that uh. doesnt feel like pr at all. its lowkey. theres not a lot of cameras. they arent the most famous people there so they get mostly left alone for the first time in literally fucking MONTHS. and they just get to. enjoy each other's company. people watch. be a little cunty while people watching which is one of the great love languages. goof off. scarf down expensive ass food. do dumb bits and be annoying. like they make each other laughhhhhhh and theyre in PARIS and the eiffel tower is lighting up and marc's head is on vale's shoulder and its SUCH a good night and its. they almost feel like its real. like this is what their lives could actually be like. and marc's heart is in his throat and suddenly theyre outside of vale's hotel room door and no one can see them so they dont have to pretend. but vale kisses him anyway.
37 notes · View notes
tired-heliotrope · 11 days
Text
i dont usually care abt discourse on here, but:
do some of you actually consider trans men "real men?"
if yall did, this big argument in the lesbian community abt mspec lesbians would not exist imo. trans men ARE men, and since the main principle of being a lesbian is not being a man and not liking men, they cannot be lesbians. and no, transmasculine people are not men unless they identify as one. identify as man = man; man ≠ lesbian, basically. i wont go anymore into it bc its common sense.
another funny thing is the complete absence (as far as i know) of this on other sides of the gay community. it seems to be common knowledge that trans women ARE, in fact, women, and that transfeminine people are not women unless they identify as one. women can be lesbians, which (almost) everyone knows, but cannot be gay men,,,bc they arent men.
i believe this discourse is rooted in some weird internalized form of transphobia, and doesnt make much sense. also im not talking abt genderfluid, genderqueer, or gnc ppl.
back to minding my business ig.
edit: keep in mind that im just sharing my opinion and i dont actually care; im not saying "mspec lesbians should die!!!" im saying they dont align with with the concept of lesbianism. also, (if some of you actually read the post in its entirety) i have clearly stated that im not talking abt most other gender groups. yall are proving my point abt the silly discourse, though.
i will not be arguing with anyone, so please feel free to relieve your anger on the "Block" or "Delete account" button.
25 notes · View notes
spacelazarwolf · 1 year
Note
whats wild to me is that if you have two people who were amab who behave and dress similarly, and experience similar years of harassment and abuse, if one comes out as a trans woman ppl will say everything she experienced was transmisogyny, she's TMA and her experiences are fundamentally based in her oppression as a woman, and if one comes out as literally anything else ppl will say they have never truly experienced transmisogyny and they arent TMA because they'll never know what its like and they aren't as affected as it as a trans woman would be. its like schrodingers transmisogyny bc u can only tell whether or not someone is TMA once they come out, n then u RETROACTIVELY interpret everything a certain way. and then if they realized they werent a trans woman then u reinterpret everything again to say that they are TME and never truly affected by transmisogyny.
honestly yeah! like you could have two identical people who were both amab and present very feminine and like fucking around with pronouns, they both experience a ton of transmisogyny because of the way they present, but if you told people that one was a trans woman and the other was a cis gay man, they’d tell you that of these two people with incredibly similar experiences only one of them gets to use transmisogyny to describe those experiences. it’s a system based in identity, not in reality, and that kind of system has no place in discussions of the real lives of queer and trans people.
118 notes · View notes
genderkoolaid · 2 years
Text
also terfs saying that gay cis ppl who date/fuck trans peope "arent real homosexuals!!!" are like. so funny. girl who gives a shit?
like okay. lets say there is such a thing as "true homosexuality". lets say everyone actually has this setting in their DNA, no matter what label you identify with. and lets say that "true homosexuals" cannot be attracted to trans people of the ""opposite"" assigned sex. And if they are, they are actually a "true bisexual".
So, the "false homosexual" is a gay cis man who is not attracted to cis women or trans women. He chooses to date trans men because he fully perceives them (whatever their ""true gender"" may be) as a man. He is attracted to him because he views him, and his body, as a man, even if he is 100% pre- or non-op.
Regardless of the fact (in this scenario) that the cis gay men's true orientation is bisexual because he is attracted to a trans man, he lives as a gay man. He is accepted by the gay community as a gay man. Being a gay man is part of his identity and his boyfriend's. They are fully seen and treated by the others in their community as a gay male couple. Nothing is practically different between them and two gay cis men. The only people who would notice or care are third parties who are upset that these two men in a happy gay relationship aren't using the right terminology to describe their relationship. Even though, on a social level, they live and are perceived as a gay male couple, so calling themselves heterosexual would be not only feel dishonest to them and their experiences, but be actively more confusing than calling themselves gay.
So, basically, who fucking gives a shit? Even in the fantasy world where we all have some innate sexual orientation stamped on our brains by Radfem Sex Jesus, on a practical level, it literally changes nothing. It's semantics. The people who complain sound like stuffy aristocratic assholes wailing that the English language's beauty and dignity is being single-handedly destroyed by people using "literally" to be hyperbolic. Like, it is only an issue on a philosophical level. If you just don't care about the philosophy, the problem goes away. And trans guys are still having hot nasty gay sex with cis men who are gay and want to have hot nasty gay sex with men.
#m.
187 notes · View notes
Note
https://www.tumblr.com/real-total-drama-takes/730285505111031808/i-hate-the-lesbian-eva-headcanon-im-fine-with
Fucking loser. this is total drama its actually entirely about sterotypes!!!! Lol! Do you have a problem with bowie? Do you have a problem with gay noah headcanons? Or do you just hate lesbians.
Also she is more than just "an angry sporty butch person" or whatever, she just doesn't have much screen time to really flesh her out as much as other characters. She has had screentime showing how sweet she can be though. She has goals outside of being sporty or whatever youre trying to argue. Shes literally just a butch woman who have historically 0 representation. Actually insane if you think that the lesbian eva hc is only stereotypes and not just fucking how some lesbians are. Especially in 2007. Some lesbians are just Fucking like that. Just like lesbians can sterotypically be any aesthetic but nooo its only offensive when its the kind of lesbian that gets ZERO FUCKING MEDIA COVERAGE. HOW IS IT STEREOTYPICAL
Also fun fact, even if she was just stereotypical, some people fit into sterotypes lol!!!! (Angriest lesbian ever speaking rn. Oh how im being so offensive right now by being stereotypically angry and a fucking hater. I hate you. Fuck you) Youre weird if you think those Real people shouldnt get representation that fits them too. Sterotypes are stereotypes for a reason. Butch sporty lesbians exist for a fucking reason.
Lesbians can have comphet too but thats in the advanced class of supporting and giving a fuck about lesbians which you clearly dgaf about LOL. Cartoon logic makes everyone fall in love with justin. And lesbians Can recognize when a man is stereotypically hot. We have eyeballs. And justin is shown to be in universe like the hottest person in the world AND a model/celebrity of sorts. Do you think gay men that are obsessed with taylor swift or lady gaga are fake gays because they "like a woman" or are you holding lesbians to a double standard answer quick
Lesbians rise eva fans rise. Band together and FUCK anyone that says its problematic to headcanon a character as something because of "sterotypes" that arent even there. I give my angry hater lesbian blessing for anyone to headcanon eva as lesbian because lesbians are awesome and deserve to be allowed in media and fandom. Live laugh love lesbians
I need to know more about you anon. Whats your deal. Are you a lesbian. Are you over the age of 14. Did you decide you were the ceo of gayness after being around 0 irl lesbians and ESPECIALLY 0 irl butches. Go outside and talk to literally any lesbian that would give a fuck (will be impossible to find because literally 0 lesbians would give two shits btw)(lesbians would be excited that anyone cared about lesbians enough to think about them)
.
29 notes · View notes
mcl38 · 3 months
Note
lmao i had to unfollow a mclaren moot because they took the "twink" thing to an extreme and were pointing out how he's just oscar's little twink and would always be fragile and small instead of big and strong and fit like "broadscar" and i really just had to. 🤦‍♀️ fit? FIT? lando was the only driver not on the brink of fainting after qatar, not everything in f1 is about how "broad" and "muscular" you seem. i wanted to give the benefit of doubt at first but when the fetishizing gay relationships turned into pushing these bodyshaming stereotypes onto a literal professional athlete i was out.
i mean its so wild bc half of them seem to give the twink descriptor to both drivers and half specifically pin it on lando because hes smaller than oscar & make it into a whole Dynamic of lando being sooo toppable or whatever. which just shows that there isnt actually any weight to 'twinklaren' at all and it rly is meaningless, bc surely if it was clear cut and obvious these differences wouldnt exist ykwim? like its just about what serves their fandom purpose in that moment
idk i think as much as the term broadscar is unfortunately quite funny to me, f1 fandom discussions abt weight and bodies r kind of bound to become problematic (real sense not 2014 tumblr sense) bc of the requirements of the sport. the way lewis has said that hes not allowed to bulk up because it would make his weight balance too lopsided (as a side note u guys do not know how ready i am for post retirement bicep BEAST lewis hamilton. the only way im gonna survive him retiring) etc like its not just about appearance for them.
in terms of how lando is fit like ur 100% right - stuff like qatar shows that he (and jon) has been doing his due diligence w preparing for these conditions. u can also just see in that last quadrant video how hes obviously very physically fit and ready for the season. its just that bodies have natural differences between them - oscar is genetically taller, lando is genetically more flexible; oscar is naturally broader around his arms, lando is naturally broader around his back, etc. and its not necessarily an issue to point these things out or even joke about them (when ppl say daniel's got birthing hips it still makes me laugh and its been years since i first heard it) but at some point it does start to show a fundamental misunderstanding of what f1 drivers do. like do i need to pull up the real sweat im a high performance athlete clip or what
so thats on the body stuff. re: the twink stuff i think the reason it rubs me, you, many ppl wrong even before we consciously realise it is like. a twink is a type - not just a body type, a *type*. in the gay male* community, you identify yourself as a twink (or bear, otter, etc) because some people are particularly attracted to twinks, bc they have a type. then obviously because the gay community is way more than just sexual attraction & has a lot of cultural capital, the term twink gained connotations and cultural history etc and grew past that. but the origins are still very much in gay male* attraction. so now that the term has become accessible to ppl who arent in that community, and therefore arent *participating*, identifying someone by their physical characteristics (and maybe implied penetrative sex preference) no longer has the subtext of appeal, but of derision. because no longer is it implied that everyone involved is a gay man*, which means calling someone a twink also implicitly calls them gay. and i think 'twink' specifically gained traction compared to other types also bc of its association w femininity in one's physical appearance - which, again, ur just derogatorily calling someone feminine and gay. even if, say, ur a member of the lgbt community who isn't a gay man*, it still carries the subtext - like anon u completely correctly identified the condescending undertones of whoever ur talking about. which is why i say we should just bring back fag #justsayfag
16 notes · View notes