#transmisogynists dni

[transfemme-sys]

making this as a sort of promo post i guess because i'm a little bit hypomanic and want to be active now suddenly

hi! do you identify as MOGAI? are you a minority? have you been harassed in the MOGAI community because of being said minority? well, this is the perfect place for you! i am a blog that aims to advocate for the safety and comfort of minorities, especially but not only poc, who are a part of the MOGAI and general LBGTQ+ community and are sick of being stepped over all the time! i aim to spread information and educate people, bring awareness to issues in the community, and stand up for those in our community that are sick and tired of the rampant racism/misogyny/transphobia/etc in MOGAI spaces.

if that sounds like something you'd be interested in, don't be afraid to follow or reblog. i'll see you all around. ;3

[echidna-auxiliatrix]

Some choice excerpts regarding gender and mass shootings from Jeff Kass' Columbine: A True Crime Story.

[thepoisonroom]

hate when i see a post about lesbianism and i search 'trans' and 'gender' on op's blog and there's no results which could mean nothing. but could also mean what i think it means.

[skrunksthatwunk]

you go to a lesbian blog and find it says women only!! no men allowed!!! and go oh! excuse me, um, what about other lesbians? plenty of lesbians are genderqueer... and they go well, okay, go fuck yourself tim chop off your sweaty dick and stop calling yourself a lesbian. you do not have a dick, actually. you think about that fact often, even though it does you no good. you do not tell this person that.

you go to another lesbian blog and it says women only and you try again, and this time they change it to wlw + nblw only (non-men who love non-men :D). and you'll say hey i appreciate that but gender's not really that cut and dry for a lot of people. someone could be both a man and nonbinary, for instance. i just worry that you're looking at nonbinary as a generic third gender, or an extension of womanhood. i mean yeah you include nblw in your tags but all your posts are about pussy-havers exclusively. what's with that? and they say go fuck yourself you pervy man pretending to be a lesbian. you tried to sneak in but i won't let you.

so you go to a lesbian blog with a dozen or so posts about queer people needing to be more weird about it and you sigh in relief. but you still see the men dni. that's odd. hoping for the best, you say hey! i know you mean well but please maybe don't put men dni at the end of the lovely posts on your lesbian blog bc some lesbians are men. and they'll be like ok!! well you're allowed ;) and you say no that's not. no. some men are lesbians not just me. you think about your own dicklessness and wonder if that's why you were given entry. and you add that even if male lesbians are allowed, there's no indication of that. how would anyone know without asking? and they're like ohh gotcha gotcha well men dni + this is for sapphics only!! and you'll be like ok well that treats the concepts of men and sapphics as mutually exclusive identities and i just told you that's not true and you agreed with me so.. i don't think that solves our problem. and they're like. ok. fine. men dni but genderfluid and multigender people are allowed! and you're like no see that's. that's still the same thing.. you're saying the same thing just with different words. if you don't want men to interact but you're fine with multigender/genderfluid/etc ppl interacting then you either don't see them as Real Men (because they don't reach a standard of Full Manhood) or Complete Men (because they're only Part-Time Men), both of which suggest that they are, in some way, not men or less-than men, which is invalidating and defeats the point of the exception in the first place (accommodation) OR that you don't really mean the dni which is confusing and inconsistent and makes guydykes feel weird and uncomfortable and excluded from the lesbian space you're trying to cultivate. and they're like um. ok. so. cishet men dni? and you're like well i think that makes more sense, but what if someone identifies as both a cishet man and a sapphic? again, if we're trying to accommodate the genderfucky populace then that has to be a possibility that is considered. and they say god you people are never happy. what do you want me to do? what am i supposed to say to keep the right men out? and you pause. you empathize with the need for a space free from dudes trying to fuck you straight and feminine. dudes who watch lesbian porn and joke about what they'd do if they were allowed into girls locker rooms. who look at you like a piece of meat, and like someone who looks at women like pieces of meat in the same way he does. you get it. you know. you want a space where you can be sapphic, too. that's why you came to these blogs in the first place. you brace yourself and you say well i don't know that there are "right men" to keep out. i don't know that there's any single label that would accomplish whatever it is you're trying to accomplish. you could go for "sapphics only" or "queers only" and i think that might be the closest thing to what you want, but it's never going to be perfect. creating any exclusive space is going to shut out people you didn't account for, and the broader the label, the more people will be shut out that you didn't want to shut out. and what about people who don't know if they're allowed? what of questioning transbians, where are they supposed to go? and, frankly, i think i might rather my dykey posts get read and appreciated by a gay guy who sees me as a man than a woman who only sees me as a sacred womb, pure from male perversions or violence or whatever. i think community might just be more complex than a dni can handle. and they look at you and say i don't want to not have a dni. i think you're too permissive. you can't just "what about" or microlabel your way into everything. go fuck yourself, i bet you're not even a lesbian anyway. go find a real problem to get mad about.

you go to a lesbian blog. you ignore the men dni because you know you probably don't even count to them. or maybe you do count and, out of respect for your manhood, they'd shun you accordingly. you try to feel okay about that. you scroll past dozens of posts about mediocre men and gagging at straight friends' boyfriends and how gross and undeserving men are of the beautiful women they couple up with and how all women should be gay so they can get treated right and and and and and. you finally find a post about curling into someone you love and feeling at peace and try to lose yourself in it. you know that feeling is what unites you, what makes you belong. you try to focus on it. you think about carding your hands through a butch's hair or lacing fingers with a femme and feeling warm and loved and more yourself than you ever have before. like this is who you're meant to be. you read about lesboys and butch boytoys and genderfucky dykes and big hairy deep-voiced wonderful women (like you want to be someday, like you wish you could make yourself) and you try to ignore the men dni underneath each and every post. and you daydream about meeting someone kind and earnest at a lesbian bar even though you don't think any such bars exist within three states of you and you can't drink and don't want to drink because you need to be in control of yourself at all times so you don't fuck up like you're always about to and here in the nonexistent lesbian bar you feel wanted and safe and in good company. you picture your ideal, happiest self. it is a mistake. ideal-you has a goatee. not the mascara one you smear on and call drag even though you know it's not drag, not really, the beard you call drag because you think everyone would look at you sadly if you told them it was just to pretend you had something out of your reach. a beard that's soft and that you grew and that cannot be smudged away if you get too comfortable with it. the dream shatters. your people pull away from you, their scoffs mixing with the mind-numbing gay girl bedroom pop you learned to settle for just to have something that almost resembled you, they all pull away and turn their backs and do not look at you. you're too close to being a man now, even though you're the same amount of man as before. and they know you're not supposed to interact with men, not as you would with dykes, at least. and it sours. it's all your imagination, all in your head, but it sours.

you sigh. you think about how small you are. how short, how narrow, how feeble. how your voice pitches up when you talk to strangers because it's easier to speak quietly when it carries more, and because you're nervous. because it's a chore to talk, like everything is. you think about testosterone. you think about how your family would look at you, the questions they would ask, your answers they would only pretend to accept. the uncomfortable glances and whispered questions they'd try to hide from you. you think about how small you are, and how small you will always be. how you don't know of a way to fix it, but even if there was one, no one would want you anymore. you'd be the only one thinking it made you a cooler dyke. you think about how you don't even want a T-voice all the time, how you'll never be able to switch it at will, because you don't know how and can't bring yourself to figure it out. you think about how your throat closes around every hint of your own attraction. how wanting is perverse, how wanting is invasive, how wanting is embarrassing and too vulnerable so it must stay anonymous, as an online witness, and how you can barely manage to form or maintain friendships because your brain makes you pull away, always spinning out and struggling to recover from the simplest of interactions. how they'll all leave you and you won't chase after them at all and how that will hurt them. how stuck you get. how it looks like nothing's holding you back, how that frustrates everyone who thought you were going to be more than you were. the people you love who understand except when it comes to being ghosted, being shut out. how you don't want to hurt them. how you can't tell them that because you're stuck. how you turn to stone when touched, how you never reach out, how you lose your speech and can't look at people, how your autism is fun and sexy until it becomes real and you never see them anymore, how much you longed for someone who knew everything without you having to explain, and who loved you anyway. how unreasonable you know that is to expect of anyone. you think about that not-even-real lesbian bar. you think about how you still can't drive. how you can't leave your home on your own, without dragging somebody into helping you. how you can't leave your body. how you can't leave your manhood behind.

you think about finding another lesbian blog and ignoring everything. about skimming it for the parts you can juice some meaning from. the parts men ignore and don't understand, and how typical of you it is to do so. or the parts where you're not welcome and you should accept that, because it's for lesbians only. how you are a lesbian anyway. how you're meant to choose lesbian or man, how each is a betrayal of some kind to yourself or your people, your family, your lovely strangers, your rare friendly acquaintances. about the parts that tell you you're not wanted, that you're ugly and lazy and gross and insert yourself everywhere without even asking. about the parts that tell you you are hated, and how lesbians are above it all by rejecting men. how lesbians are each blessed miracles. about the parts that say you should be ashamed of being whatever twisted confused freak you are, of everything, of looking and wanting or not looking or not wanting, of picking and choosing instead of taking it all in with a smile. after all, shouldn't you take it? or is your ego too fragile, as men's so often are? aren't you tired? good. we're not here for your consumption. and we sure as hell don't want your company or "community" or whatever. didn't you read the sign? no boys allowed. and if you want to come in you have to make up your mind. as if you haven't told them the only answer you have. you're both. you're both.

you know you broke the rule by interacting.

but it gets lonely sometimes. you wonder if they know.

[pwurrz]

male tits and girl dicks are NORMAL they are 100% normal to me and not just in a sex way but also like, if you are ftm and wanna chill with your boobs out no bra/binder or are mtf and wanna chill in boxers or underwear with a bulge why the hell not? it’s just body parts ya know.

why does it have to be inherently sexualized by people? If you DO find it sexy that’s ok but i’m referring to transphobes who treat trans peoples bodies as some kind of… “scary” thing

[noisytenant]

Now I'm all here for restorative and transformative justice but I can't help but wish that transmisogynists would get raptured in like a bad way or something

[lesser-vissir]

I really do feel like we're a little too hard on white queers. Much of what we say is 100% deserved, but some of y'all make it seem like you think being a white queer is like,,, not real oppression?

This is especially annoying when it comes to how some of y'all treat white trans women but even when it comes to white gay men y'all can't be acting like racism is inherently worse than homo/transphobia.

They cannot be compared. Easy as. Just acknowledge that and walk away. If it's an intercommunity discussion about how race affects being queer, or how white queers treat queers of color, that's a discussion that can be had but like, fr y'all tone it the fuck down cause now you got white people doing it too for clout.

[aristotels]

Throwback to the time I saw someone (yes, a tumblr user) call Putin a TERF. I just use “transphobe” now.

AJIODJSIOHSIOHAHAHAHAHA IM REELING THATS SO FUCKING FUNNY

AH YES. PUTIN. THE FAMOUS...TRANS EXCLUSIONARY.... RADICAL... FEMINIST..........

[daggersandarrows]

the only thing i hate more than terfs are cryptoterfs

[verdantmeadows]

Rant post about transphobia

Something that really bothers me is that when someone is a big transphobe everyone only talks about how it ever affects trans women and if you try to bring up that their transphobia affects trans men and other trans people just as much, they call you a transmisogynist when in fact transphobia is just transphobia regardless of the individual's gender identity. There is of course transphobia that is the intersection of transphobia and misogyny (transmisogyny). But some people become literal supremacists in feeling that the oppression trans women face is morally above or more important than the oppression of trans men when in fact they are one in the same because transphobia is transphobia and both trans women and trans men face misogyny. Too many people I see online become supremacists in certain identities over other identities or certain ways of existing rather than realizing that becoming a supremacist over a certain thing is always bad and we need to be kind to each other and our different experiences. I have seen a lot of people who are supremacists regarding trans women to the point that it is nearly impossible to talk about or include trans men in discussions of transphobia without being told that you are transphobic to trans women. Anyways this is kind of a rant I am just sick of the rampant exclusion of trans men from transphobia.

[gremlingirlsmell]

hey if you hate bi lesbians so fucking much you reblog a screed we all should die, maybe don't interact with my posts, and especially don't add something to them calling me """OOMFIE""" (I was NOT following you)

[marxism-transgenderism]

Also can we finally get it understood that putting "transmisogynists dni/get blocked" or whatever in bios doesn't mean shit to trans women. Literally do you know how many times I've read the most transmisogynistic shit in the entire world and it's come from someone with like "trans women are loved and supported here" in the bio

[molsno]

I don't think there's enough discussion of the transmisogynistic voyeurism that's extremely widespread in online spaces. it's definitely a problem offline too but it's become significantly more pervasive and inescapable online.

transmisogynistic voyeurism is an obsession with trans women's internal lives. while traditionally it's usually been focused on our bodies, hormones, sexualities, transitions, and other such aspects that portray us as exotic, artificial, hypersexual mimics of "real" women (this is still largely the case among conservatives), it's taken on a new form in the past several years as society's understanding of transness has slowly improved.

in more recent years, the fascination with trans women and transfemininity, particularly in purportedly progressive spaces, has shifted to focus on the "artificiality" of our womanhood from a sociocultural perspective, rather than from a biological and sexual perspective.

it's become common to see screenshots from 4chan and other similar communities of trans women or transfem eggs posting about their unusual kinks, often with racist or antisemitic undertones. screenshots of ostensibly closeted trans women being transphobic to openly trans people have become commonplace. whenever a trans woman is revealed to be racist or a sexual predator, she becomes the new topic du jour, where everyone has to weigh in and publicly disavow her actions.

you might be thinking, what's the problem with this? after all, shouldn't we be holding racists, antisemites, transphobes, and sexual predators accountable? and while the answer to that question is an unambiguous, resounding "yes!", the problem here is the unusual focus on trans women in particular, and the fact that what's happening doesn't even remotely resemble accountability.

bigotry is not a uniquely transfeminine trait. anyone can be a bigot. however, by and large, even supposed trans allies, people who put "trans women are women" and "terfs dni" in their bio, still secretly see trans women as fundamentally male, due to having been "male socialized" (a notion which very strongly contradicts our own lived experiences). thus, when they see post after post after post of trans women being bigoted, it reifies tme people's beliefs that we are all holders of male privilege who have never had to face oppression before coming out as trans.

this idea is problematic for a number of reasons. first, it denies the experiences of trans women who have been oppressed by other systems before coming out as trans. for example, multiple times in just the past few weeks, I've seen trans women of color accused of being racist, even against people of their own race; as if having to face racism all their lives wasn't bad enough, now they're assumed to be perpetrators of it. however, this idea also ignores the very real effect that transmisogyny has had in shaping our lives, even when we didn't know we were trans ourselves.

when we attempt to talk about this topic - the perception that tme people have of trans women being uniquely bigoted, we are by and large brushed off as seeking to "excuse the actions" of bigoted trans women so that we can be bigoted ourselves. this abject refusal to actually engage with what we are saying to instead paint us as the very people we're constantly made to publicly disavow lest we face social ostracization (even if we have no idea who said people even are) further reifies the stereotype of us as privileged men.

I want you to imagine for a moment if trans men were subjected to this kind of voyeurism instead. on an average day scrolling through tumblr, you'd see a post of a trans man's nsfw blog where he shares posts about how rape should be legal, right alongside his bloodplay and cannibalism kink posts, accusing trans men of normalizing rape and murder. another post would show a screenshot of the trans guy who proclaimed to have been hitler in a past life, accompanied by comments demanding trans men take responsibility by purging their community of people like him. you'd scroll down a little further and see a screenshot of a terf blog with "dysphoric female" in bio where they complain about how a trans man they know has been brainwashed by "gender ideology" with all of the comments hoping they figure out their gender identity but still vehemently disavowing them and asserting they would feel unsafe around such a person even after coming out.

the reason that doesn't happen is because biological essentialism runs rampant even in queer spaces. trans men, who were afab, are often presumed to be incapable of harm due to having been "female socialized". trans men don't have their kinks publicly shared to paint them as dangerous because they're generally assumed to be victims of sexual violence, not perpetrators. trans men aren't collectively held accountable for the actions of one trans man they don't even know because a trans man doing harm is believed to be an anomaly, and thus can be dealt with on an individual basis. that last example is especially laughable, because trans men who were formerly terfs are often lauded as heroes for sharing their stories and offered condolences for having been victims of "cult brainwashing".

the fact that this kind of voyeurism does happen to trans women is because, having been amab, we are presumed to be the perpetrators of harm rather than victims. that's not to say that trans women can't be bigoted or dangerous; clearly they can, or else this kind of voyeurism couldn't exist in the first place.

trans women can be racist, trans women can be antisemitic, trans women can be transphobic, trans women can be sexual predators, and so on. these things are all true. however, they are not more likely to be true of trans women than of other demographics. that's the point I'm trying to make here.

stop and consider for a moment, what accountability actually means. are racist, antisemitic trans women being held accountable when you share screenshots of the bigotry they post anonymously on 4chan? does that screenshot you reblogged of an assumed transfem egg being transphobic to an out trans person hold them responsible for their transphobia? is that racist trans woman who's a convicted sexual predator sentenced to prison being held accountable when you share detailed documentaries about her crimes? are they facing consequences for their actions because of you raising awareness about them?

in the vast majority of cases, the answer is no. what's really happening is that you're raising outrage about trans women, and demanding that all of us publicly disavow and distance ourselves from them, even when we have no idea who they are, so that you won't come after us next. you're upholding the idea that trans women hold a "male privilege debt" that we can never fully repay but must endlessly strive to repay regardless. this obsession with our perceived socially male traits has got to stop.

[ot3]

Obviously I am not a Female/Lesbian Separatist or whatever because there are tons of very severe problems with that as a political ideology, many of which are violently transmisogynistic among other things. But acting like the issues with that political movement extend to individual women (many of whom are trans) requesting that men don't interact with their social media accounts is just misogynist horseshit.

It's all "set boundaries in your online interactions" and "curate your space however makes you feel happiest and most comfortable" as advice to enjoy your time online until those boundaries and curation dare to exclude men. And 'exclude' is a strong word in this case because as has been pointed out so many times on this site, DNIs don't actually have any means of stopping anyone from doing jack shit and are really just a request for your boundaries to be honored.

[sickstag]

JACK, HE/HIM, 18, TRANSMALE

18+ BLOG. Have age displayed in bio or you will be blocked.

This is a horny side blog and is open to every identity. I heavily encourage sending DM’s / Asks, dirty or not. Let me know what’s going on in that pretty little puppybrain of yours.

When referring to me/ my body, I don’t have a preference for masculine or feminine terms

I’m a switch who’s both top and dom leaning but I do still have submissive moments on here (I am a major brat) and am open to asks/ messages from doms <3 a lot of the time I’ll still want to top when I’m being submissive, or bottom when I’m feeling dominant, my position doesn’t always correlate to the sexual dynamic.

DNI-

🐑Scat

🐑Zoo/ Pedo

🐑Raceplay

🐑’Men DNI’ blogs

🐑Transmisogynists

KINKS-

⛪️Age difference/ Size difference

⛪️Petplay

⛪️Light Humiliation/ Masochism

⛪️Primal Play

⛪️Breeding

⛪️Knotting

⛪️Cockwarming

⛪️Praise AND Light Degradation

⛪️Brats <3

⛪️Dumbification

⛪️Overstim

⛪️Intox (alcohol)

⛪️CNC

⛪️Impact Play

⛪️Doctor kink

⛪️Gunplay

Etc

Taken anons: 🦊🐶💋🐾 🧶🦌🦮🌵🌷🐰🤖✨🥩🐈‍⬛🦋🌸💫🌹😇⭐️’🐑🍓’🥛🦴🩰🐙’🧟🖤’

Names I like to be called: Master - Daddy - Jack - Sir

If you’d like to try and dom me, you can call me: Pup - Mutt - Doggy - whatever gets you off most.

Names I like to call others: Dolly, Darling, Sweet thing, Mutt, Pup/ Puppy, Kit (like a fox), Pet, Sweetheart, etc

P.s

I have a tendency to open tumblr and immediately close it, meaning I forget to respond. If you haven’t received a response from me in some time, or my responses are slow, you haven’t done anything wrong. Send me a follow up message.

[caninekin-culture-is]

Caninekin culture is...

Hello!! Welcome to caninekin culture is! Submit asks about caninekin experiences :3333

Meet the mods! Hi, I'm Calypso, AKA mod 🧜‍♀️. I'm the one who made the blog, and my main is @edible-emerald! I'm a northwestern wolf therian and a minor so don't be a creep lol

--

mod 🦷 here, reporting for canine duty >:3 here's some info abt me!!

im an omnitherian

my main blog is @asthmaticromantic !

i draw. a lot!! that's enough 'bout me, i'm going to be here to answer the inbox and make this blog fun! let's go! :D

DNI: Racists (this extends to neonazis/antisemetics), sexists/misogynists, homophobes, transphobes/transmisogynists/TERFs, aphobes, ableists, anti-furries, anti-therians, zoophiles, pedophiles/MAPs, NSFW/kink accounts, anti-selfdiag, radqueers/transIDs, pro/conshippers, anti-agere/petre

WE STILL CAN'T GET OUR PFP TO BE CENTERED AGHGFDGDJGHDJZ

Tags:

#caninekin culture is and #caninekincultureis are for any post that are caninekin culture

#not culture is any post that isn’t caninekin culture

I also tag every post with #(insert a canine)kin, so if you want specific cultures of specific creatures search up #(canine) kin, #(canine) therian, or #(canine) theriotype

I’m probably going to redo the tagging system later by for now that’s it

I keep accidentally reblogging posts to this account so if you see that sorry lol

Also I tend to reblog random caninekin posts so you’ll see those sometimes

*

Who can send asks to this blog?

Canine therians (Wolves, dogs, foxes, coyotes, dingos, raccoon dogs, jackals, dholes, etc)

Mythical Canine otherkin (Werewolves, werefoxes, kitsunes, church grims, etc.)

Canine hybrids, this includes real hybrids like wolfdogs, coywolves, or coydogs, but can also be mythical hybrids, like werewolf vampire hybrids

Caninehearted folk

Caninelink otherlink, copinglink, funlink, etc.

Alters/headmates/sys members who identify as/are a canine in some way

Fictional canine caninekins

Hyenas and raccoons, there’s an ask explaining why somewhere. ASKS ABOUT THIS TOPIC WILL BE DELETED.

Objectkins/Conceptkins who identify as a canine related object or concept (Dog toys, bones, caves, etc)

Nonliving canine otherkin (Balloon dogs, dog plushies, etc)

Noncaninekin, who want to send in a not culture ask to ask something, clarify something, or just learn more about alterhumanity in general!

Questioning caninekins who want assistance in finding their identity!

(Userbox by @/macaw-squawks)