it's a big thing for us to say Logan fell first and he fell harder because Wade falls fast. Very fast very obviously to someone attuned to his tells. At the time that he learned to care for Logan, Logan wasn't attuned yet.
It's a bold statement to say Logan fell first because that's suggesting he learned to care for Wade even faster than Wade learned to care for him in vice versa.
128 notes
·
View notes
fascinated by the phenomenon of male blue lock fans on the r/bluelock subreddit saying out loud that "fangirls" liking the same characters as them makes them feel the need to choose new favorites. you're saying your goated smartguy favorite seems less tough to you because he gets too much pussy?
37 notes
·
View notes
Sir Joseph Lockwood
I always got on particularly well with Joe, I liked him a lot. I think he was a very clever man and found him a very charming bloke with a sense of humour. So it never got heavy with Joe. He always had his young personal-assistant guy with him, very charming. It was unusual for us, who'd not seen the head of a big company like that that at close hand; with a private life, just to the side of it all. You were seeing power in high places.
Paul talking about Sir Joseph Lockwood in Many Years From Now (emphasis mine)
The "young personal-assistant guy" (William Cavendish) has written a book. All the official materials refer to him as a "good friend" of Sir Joe, but it seems very clear that they were life partners. (As Paul hinted).
Anyway I thought that was interesting context for Joe's comments about the cover of Two Virgins:
Well, then, why not show Paul in the nude? He’s so much prettier!
The page in Many Years From Now:
32 notes
·
View notes
rant about my cishet friend making me question my aroace-ness under the cut
i just did an 11 minute long audio to my close friend communicating him why his recent behaviour was super hurtful. like, he says he doesn't believe in labels, ok fine, but, why does that mean he doesn't have to make ANY effort in understanding the one i chose for myself? i get it, he's confused bc i claimed to be bi for eight years and he has seen me in relationships. but when i try to explain that 1. i confuse platonic affection with romantic affection bc i have severe attachment issues, 2. society expected me to kiss and f!ck a man so they'd shut the hell up, 3. 0+0 does not equal 2 but still 0, he just. does not understand this. i literally broke down crying today cause calling myself aroace felt so fucking freeing. because it meant i could accept that the ick i got from flirting and my urge to pull away the second it was more than just talking and having a good time was valid! and not just me being weird! like, i legit cried cause what if i am faking it? but the thought of someone approaching me and flirting at my sister's party tomorrow makes me want to crawl into a hole and hiss. irl ppl talking about sex makes me extremely uncomfortable but i've had it myself so i gotta be faking it. ofc i liked it, right, it surely wasn't a way of making that person i liked a lot stay and not leave me.
and my one ace friend is literally my only support cause she gets it. i never even had to explain it
21 notes
·
View notes
not quite homosexual nor homoramantic, but a secret third thing
57 notes
·
View notes
hmm wishing more people could remember that black cis women and other woc are often denied womanhood / characterized as masculine in a way to purposefully dehumanize them ... when people write these scathing things about 'why do cis women act like being considered not cis is so evil' im like babes. as a fellow trans you should be able to put two and two together 😭
19 notes
·
View notes
so i started by looking through the 2009 all star blogs and have finally hit the 2014 oly*mpics and :
this is so funny and confirms my silly tag:
the idea of insanely tall geno trying to hide behind anybody is adorable and obviously would work about as well as covering your eyes to block out the sun but the description of geno just:
awwwwwwwwww ;_;
25 notes
·
View notes