thecorefrisk

[thecorefrisk]

I love how the ship name ‘analogical’ is an actual word. Logan would love that.

[thecorefrisk]

When people headcannon stereotypically stoic or ‘cold’/unfeeling characters to be aromantic it tends to tell me exactly what they think of aromantic people.

I’m not aromantic, but that doesn’t mean I can’t get mad when people decide that because aromantic people don’t experience romantic attraction it means they also don’t experience sexual or simply platonic affection for people.

It’s incorrect, there are just too many aromantic people for that to be true for every single aromantic character and pushing the narrative that they are these unfeeling robots only further demonizes them.

[thecorefrisk]

YES.

Sure, the concept of Deku as a villain is cool! But only if you change everything about his character or have him be irrevocably changed by an experience. And even then, he has been shown to push past adversity and still want to be a hero despite it or even because of it. If it was an AU in which the author explores a world where Deku was a villain (not an antihero but an actual villain), they would first have to acknowledge that… he would never. Villainy isn’t in him. He would be, at worst, an anti-hero (a hero that pursues a noble goal through immoral means) and again in a worst case scenario he’d have just been forced to give on his dream and work a corporate job or even a teaching job as he seems to pursue that when he loses his powers.

People see these sensitive, kind people and they just want to… break them for some reason. (Not even in a sexual sense which I could logically understand because people are freaks.) They’re the kind of people the Joker tells scary stories about as he’s killing kids— like, ‘They’ll want to break you, reshape you, remold you. And then they’ll say they did some good by doing it.’

You can have so much angst with a character that refuses to give up. Because I’m someone who refuses to give up, but I’ve also given up on a lot of things! Imagine the opportunities, the people, the nights that turn into days that a hero has to give up just to be a hero. Being a hero isn’t what it’s cut out to be because you can’t exactly manage those two lives unless you have a team by your side. And they don’t tend to.

Also the possibility of the death of you or a loved one is so high from the moment you step into the field no matter the universe. Because sometimes a villain is just that obsessed with you. Sometimes they do just hate you that much.

I just think it’s so much more interesting to place a morally white character in a morally grey or even morally black world. That’s so much more interesting to me because now they have to battle to keep their goodness or someone else’s.

I find it so much more impressive to see someone stand up to protect a complete stranger with their life, to see someone to look a cruel person in the eye and be kind, to see someone answer the call even after all the horrible things that has happened to them than to have them be some random super powered (or even power-less) loser who after all the good they were raised around, all the morals instilled in them, they decided to go ‘Nah’ and kill a bunch of kids off.

It’s just so stupid that blood thirst is such a praised thing nowadays. What is so impressive about yet another man killing off nameless civilians for either the sake of it or to ‘make a point’? Just doesn’t make sense to me. I can understand them. To a point. I mean, it’s super hard to live up to these guys who would do anything for their friends and go through all these traumatic experiences for people that they don’t even know. But that doesn’t mean erase those characters entirely.

They keep looking to the wrong characters for a blood bath and by doing that they also encourage this narrative of ‘all men are violent’ or even encourage these men to do violent things because kids grow up with these things! And your mind is trained to believe whatever your eyes see— even if you know that it is not true. Like how doing affirmations in the mirror works wonders for some people or even how some people some forms of media and then essentially that piece of media affects how they view the world. What we see impacts how we think.

Just. It’s boring. It’s overdone. Evil wins? We literally have enough of that. Tragedy and misery are not the complex experiences these people think they are because tragedy and misery are universal experiences. Kindness, on the other hand, is something to latch onto. Goodness is something you choose to do and it comes more naturally to some than it does to others but that is an understood thing.

However, with the rise of these emotionless, violent characters in the place of noble heroes, we also see a diminishing of what it means to be gentle, kind, and even just plain polite. The concept of good is a complex thought in of itself because we decide what good is. Is good killing off that villain because there is a possibility of them still being a threat and hurting even more people or is it in sparing them? (I personally believe ummm, kill them off and you’ll save yourself the trouble! Why? Just because people have the ability to change it doesn’t mean they are going to change. And if they do it might not be for the better.)

(Thank you btw. For your thing at the end.)

I hate that whenever we have a story about kindness and the trials and tribulations of trying to be a good person and how hard it is to be good people always come out of the woodwork with something like, “But what if they were evil?”

Like, no. We don’t need the same exact emotionless Superman. He represents hope and love. If you want grit and gore, go to Gotham.

And no, Deku does not need to be ‘meaner’ nor would he ever be a villain in any sort of way. He is just that kind of person. (Villain Deku AUs are always so unrealistic to me because even in world where he got saved by villains, he’d never hurt nor want to hurt people. At worst, he’d work the same old boring 9 to 5 most of America is working right now.) (It always pisses me off whenever people say they would’ve preferred the prototype version of Deku because no they would have not. They want a fanfic— not an entire work like that. If we had gotten the prototype, people would likely be saying the same thing about the Deku that we have right now.)

There are so many heroes you guys turn into villains just because you want ‘something different’. Different doesn’t mean interesting. Different doesn’t always mean good. I can agree that seeing the same thing over and over again gets tiring. I cannot agree that we should change the core values of any thing or any character for the sake of seeing ‘something original’, ‘something different’.

I can agree with putting a twist on that character. That can be interesting. It can even be beneficial to the character’s development.

But you guys hate whimsy and fun and goodness so much that you see it as something to be purged. You want it gone from every wonderful character. Sometimes characters, sometimes people, are just that good. And there’s nothing you can fucking do about it.

[thecorefrisk]

I love those fics where Toothless is actually older than Hiccup and it’s portrayed as this like ‘Oh, look at this gigantic thing and the small child that keeps following him around because the gigantic thing thinks it’s his baby’.

It’s so awesome because it further expands on dragon family dynamics and kinda shows the perspective the dragons had on the time of the Red Death through how the treat the young ones of Berk— specifically Hiccup, someone who literally looked like the human version of a wet cat.

(And not entirely in a pathetic way either because even when wet, cats will hiss at you.)

There’s only one thing I wish there was more of in them. Toothless being like a bat </3. That’s really what they were leaning towards in the first movie and I was so sad when there was none of that in the rest. He lost his batty qualities. Toothless isn’t cat-like. He’s batty. And he would be so much cooler if they had leaned into that instead of making him a giant puppy.

(I wouldn’t have minded the giant puppy qualities if we were sometimes reminded that he’s still a beast throughout it all. Y’know, a show of how he’s not domesticated, he’s just with Hiccup. He’s still a dragon.)

(Idk, it makes people seem dumb for being scared of dragons when they don’t acknowledge that the large, lizard pet currently drooling all over that kid’s pale, pale face is still a dragon and they’re not going to adhere to dog rules or even human rules because they aren’t dogs and they’re aren’t human. They are large, scaly beasts.

The point of How to Train Your Dragon 1 was an acknowledgment that ‘yes, these are large and terrifying creatures’. ‘But they’re also ______’. They acknowledge that Toothless was still a dragon but there was more to him than that.

In the way that a lot of society hates wasps, but they’re still essential to the environment. Or how people are terrified of lions, tigers, and cheetahs but they’re still pretty fucking cool.

Like, yes, they are dangerous but they’re also just beings trying to survive just like you and I. They showed how dragons wouldn’t have a reason to attack the people of Berk if they genuinely hadn’t been given a reason to. That reason being… the Red Death.)

[thecorefrisk]

My actual critic of genderbent Bilbo fics is that they always make her much more helpless than she would be. I’m not saying that if Bilbo was a woman he wouldn’t have even more trouble with the dwarves and how things in The Company are done, I’m saying that all the badass thing Bilbo did would’ve still gotten done if he were a lady.

[thecorefrisk]

I hate that whenever we have a story about kindness and the trials and tribulations of trying to be a good person and how hard it is to be good people always come out of the woodwork with something like, “But what if they were evil?”

Like, no. We don’t need the same exact emotionless Superman. He represents hope and love. If you want grit and gore, go to Gotham.

And no, Deku does not need to be ‘meaner’ nor would he ever be a villain in any sort of way. He is just that kind of person. (Villain Deku AUs are always so unrealistic to me because even in world where he got saved by villains, he’d never hurt nor want to hurt people. At worst, he’d work the same old boring 9 to 5 most of America is working right now.) (It always pisses me off whenever people say they would’ve preferred the prototype version of Deku because no they would have not. They want a fanfic— not an entire work like that. If we had gotten the prototype, people would likely be saying the same thing about the Deku that we have right now.)

There are so many heroes you guys turn into villains just because you want ‘something different’. Different doesn’t mean interesting. Different doesn’t always mean good. I can agree that seeing the same thing over and over again gets tiring. I cannot agree that we should change the core values of any thing or any character for the sake of seeing ‘something original’, ‘something different’.

I can agree with putting a twist on that character. That can be interesting. It can even be beneficial to the character’s development.

But you guys hate whimsy and fun and goodness so much that you see it as something to be purged. You want it gone from every wonderful character. Sometimes characters, sometimes people, are just that good. And there’s nothing you can fucking do about it.

[thecorefrisk]

When you watch something and… everyone has all the wrong takes on it.

[thecorefrisk]

Do you ever wonder what would happen in an omegaverse au if a puppy found out one of the betas actually have tits? Like how sometimes a baby will sometimes latch onto a man’s boobie cause it vaguely resembles their mom’s and it’s in their face.

Especially if it’s an ‘instinct ridden’ puppy. Their mind is all mush and goo and all they know is that they need their omega/parent or whatever. And here is this beta. Who is a part of their pack.

And the way that I perceive betas is that they’re the gatherers/hunters because the ‘alpha’ is usually the protector of the pack, the omega takes care of the babies/pups, and the betas… what do they do for the pack? Well, they have to do something. And that is… provide!!

In a time where they had to, betas would be the people going out and hunting down prey and bringing it back for the pack to tear apart. The ones who gather up fruits and berries and maybe, later on, spices! That’s why you tend to have multiple betas in a pack while you have few omegas and alphas in comparison.

(I also think betas might be able to bend to the other genders if you know what I mean? Like, if there isn’t an omega around and a puppy needs protecting or assistance or even mothering… the beta steps in. Or maybe the pack doesn’t have an Alpha! Maybe there are deadbeats in this universe in more than one way. A beta will then step in and now you have a mimic of an Alpha! It’s not perfect, of course, but they make it work— having to mimic the instincts and behaviors of an entirely different second gender.

But this is like.. a worst case scenario thing. Like, they HAVE to (or feel like they have to). This isn’t a momentary ‘Oh, he left for vacation…? Well I guess I have to step in for a while!’ No, this isn’t a Dick becoming Batman for a bit sort of thing.)

(Also, it would be so fun to write about a beta forced to mimic another second gender and then, because they’ve been mimicking it for so long, they either become that second gender, they forget they are a beta, or struggle to come back into their beta instincts/mimic another second gender.)

You can’t exactly feed someone and focus on protecting them at the same time unless you want to slip on one job.

(This is why I headcannon Tim as a beta because something in me can’t see him around children in a parent like fashion. Idk he’s a bit of a disaster.)

And ‘providing’ is a bit similar to what the omegas do— which is taking care of and protecting the pups in specific.

So it’s going to get some wires crossed. Especially if that puppy is quite attached to the beta.

So they might try. It’s not like it’ll work but they’ll certainly try. They will try their hardest.

[thecorefrisk]

Anyone else just have a nightmare about the joker? Because I did.

How the fuck.

[thecorefrisk]

Uh, dark/possessive SBI prompt ummm bird jealousy.

You know how angry it makes a person when someone else does something for one of their family members or friends that they themselves were hoping to do because they genuinely like doing that stuff for them?

Imagine how pissed Philza would be if some other avian/elytran decided to preen one of his kids’ hair or, worse, their wings. (If they have them. Tommy is usually the one who has wings.) Just think about a Philza who already has the nest prepped, is in prime preening position, is so ready to preen his kid’s wings and then turns out that said kid had been nervous for a reason. Their wings had already been preened. Preened by someone who knew what they were doing.

I would be so mad.

And, in a way, it’s kind of a threat. Like, some other avian did his job for him which basically said, ‘Look how I preen your kid’s feathers, look how devotedly I take care of them; wouldn’t I take so much better care of them?’

In other words, it’s the bird equivalent of saying, ‘Fuck you, you’re replaceable; anyone could do what you do, and I could do it better.’

His kid (Wilbur, Techno, Tommy, hell, even the rare Fundy or Ranboo, fuck even an OC because people love to give that guy children) might not even know that it was insulting to their father that they let another avian preen their hair/wings. Or maybe they do know or just didn’t know how big of an insult that was or simply didn’t think he’d care.

(Love the last one. Especially in those AUs where Tommy is reincarnated into a novel and it follows a manhwa-esque sort of storyline.)

[thecorefrisk]

Do you ever look at a character and go “Yeah, I gave birth to them. They’re mine now.” Even if the character is like decades older than you? Welcome to my head, here on the right we have—

[thecorefrisk]

Have you ever accidentally written something that explicitly says your favorite character gets absolutely NO HOES.

I have. It’s great.

[thecorefrisk]

I love whorish fashion. Like ACTUALLY whorish. Skirts are barely a string around your hips, your bra is always peeking out, shorts are always a bit loose, everything is on display. I think it looks so good.

But thongs look so damn uncomfortable. And I don’t-

I just don’t get it. This is mostly because I have that thing against the word itself but also because I cannot imagine having the world’s worst wedgie that you can never fix.

[thecorefrisk]

What do you mean Bruce has empty nest syndrome. What are you talking about. *dark sbi flashbacks*

[thecorefrisk]

Could someone give me a list of all of the MAGA people that like Donald Trump chose? I wanna see something.

[thecorefrisk]

The moment someone says that they hate certain characters (male or not, female or not) because they ‘got in the way of their ship’ I immediately stop trusting any opinion they might have on anyone because they’re the type that if they don’t get their way they are, in fact, storming the capital.

[thecorefrisk]

You know..

Trying to subvert stereotypes by always making the woman the ‘man’ of the relationship just creates more stereotypes and further pushes the narrative that women should be the ones taking care of everything. And not in the sense that ‘oh, women should have leadership roles and they should be allowed actual agency’ but more so that they have to be in charge of EVERYTHING.

And also it pushes racist narratives. Like the way you guys constantly masculinize black women in media. I know you’re trying to be original and put a twist on a common narrative that women are the ‘sweet, submissive’ ones while men are the ‘dominant, strong’ ones but acting like every single ship and every piece of media has this whole girlboss x male wife thing just dumbs down entire characters into gimmicks.

You’re stripping women’s personalities to push for more ‘progressive’ ones when in fact, not every girl wants to carry a man. Sometimes they want to be the one carried. Sometimes, women are feminine and sweet and there’s nothing wrong with that. You guys are making it seem like masculinity is somehow superior to femininity. Which it isn’t.

In your efforts to deconstruct and tear down sexist tropes, you are making even more sexist and racist ones by trying to thrust this onto everything when sometimes… the man is the one carrying the woman in a princess carry. Or, the men aren’t holding each other bridal style. Sometimes they’re the type to throw arms over each other’s shoulders instead.

Okay, wow, just realized something. You guys are trying to add a ‘man, woman’ thing to everyone. Like, ‘who is the man in the relationship’ in a wlw relationship. Or ‘who’s the woman’ for mlm relationships. You’re pushing the homophobic rhetoric that there has to be a man and a woman for there to be a romantic or sexual relationship but through femininity and masculinity.

Wow. You guys kinda suck.