Tumgik
woolfinbooks · 11 months
Text
Gay Book Recommendations
1 note · View note
woolfinbooks · 11 months
Text
Elder Queer Book Recommendations
6 notes · View notes
woolfinbooks · 11 months
Text
1 note · View note
woolfinbooks · 11 months
Text
Tbh, I'm not feeling okay in my body today. I wish I had irl friends who were nonbinary and trans or just understood how to talk to when I'm feeling like this. I have online friends, and they're great, but I need people near me too, you know?
0 notes
woolfinbooks · 11 months
Text
Please stop giving Judy Garland credit for Stonewall. She had nothing to do with it. No one at the bar was sitting there getting drunk and mourning her death. The people at Stonewall weren't her fanbase. They were too young. They might've known her, but Judy was the icon of older middle-class cis gay men. no the 20-somethings at Stonewall. Most of her fans were in their 40s and 50s at the time. They were well off enough to waste money seeing a show she probably wouldn't not up to. Stonewall wasn't a place they'd go to.
The people at Stonewall were gay, bi, trans, bipoc, and usually poor or homeless. They were worried about where they were going to sleep that night, not that some wealthy white woman that their parents grew up with died. That's like saying a bunch of Gen Z kids would riot if Bernadette Peters died. It just doesn't make sense.
The association with her and the riots came to be because newspapers knew nothing about gay culture besides Judy being beloved by a specific demographic of gay men. The specks of gay representation at the time featured nearly exclusively that demographic. They made the assumption that, because her funeral was two days before, the riots had something to do with her. The narrative newspapers went with was a bunch of gay men were being overdramatic and cops had to stop them. T
You have to remember that the riots were just over a year after the Civil Rights Act was passed. Places were still rebuilding and cops were undergoing an image change. A lot of the country didn't like cops because of how they harassed Black people and how much proof of it existed. They feared a nationwide queer uprising and the damage that would do to property and the image of cops. Blaming it on Judy was an easy scapegoat. Gay men were already known for being dramatic, so of course that's the narrative they went with. That narrative shifted into more conversation newspapers being able to label bipoc queer people as dangerous. Because not only did they view their race as dangerous, but their sexuality too.
2 notes · View notes
woolfinbooks · 11 months
Text
Demisexual Book Recommendations
2 notes · View notes
woolfinbooks · 11 months
Text
I'm new to Tumblr. Ask me anything :3
0 notes
woolfinbooks · 11 months
Text
Demiromantic Book Suggestions
1 note · View note
woolfinbooks · 11 months
Text
queerplatonic is whatever those 3 middleaged animal men from ice age had btw. i hope you understand now
90K notes · View notes
woolfinbooks · 11 months
Text
Ace thoughts...
cw: I talk about sex in terms of media and briefly mention kink
I'm ace and have become sex repulsed when it comes to irl sex. No part of me wants to ever have sex again. Which is strange because I used to really enjoy it mentally and physically. It was a slow shift where I thought maybe I was demi or gray ace, but realized in the past year or so that I'm ace.
I enjoy sex in media sometimes, but never in a sexual way. It can be fun and interesting. A lot of it is boring though. It does nothing for the plot and I hate it. It's the same kind of sex (cishet, white, missionary or unrealistic positions) and has the same issues with the male gaze. That's not what I think is interesting. There are times when it's beautiful. Like on Wynonna Earp with the staircase. Or in the book Eight Kinky Nights by Xan West.
What is it about media sex that I'm not repulsed by? No idea. Maybe I'm used to it? It's expected? What I liked about Succession was the lack of sex (and the joy in hating every character lol) It was discussed and implied, but not as in-your-face as it is in other shows. I'm an older person and that's the kind of stuff I want more of. Less sex, more interesting dialogue, but that's unrealistic.
Everyone I know is either full-on sex repulsed and can't even watch fade to black scenes, allosexual, or they don't have any strong feelings about it. It feels kind of lonely sometimes not having people who relate to this.
Do I want to have sex in real life? No. Never. Do I want to watch porn? No, but I support the hell out of sex workers. Do I want read kinky books with interesting dynamics that I've never considered before because I think they're interesting and beautiful? YES!
1 note · View note
woolfinbooks · 11 months
Text
Butch & Stud Book Recommendations
Tumblr media
1 note · View note
woolfinbooks · 11 months
Text
Bisexual book recommendations
36 notes · View notes
woolfinbooks · 11 months
Text
Aro/Ace book suggestions
I am going to be sharing books with LGBTQ+ representation all month long. Yesterday and today I made posts on my blog about books with aromantic and asexual representation. It's not every single book with those representations that exists, but thing me and my friends like and felt represented by :)
4 notes · View notes
woolfinbooks · 11 months
Text
Legit question... how do I make friends on here? It seems like everyone already has their tight-knit groups and I'm trying to squeeze in a place not for me. Every time I see things about Tumblr on other sites it feels like it *should* be my favorite place on the internet, but I just feel lonely. :/
38 notes · View notes
woolfinbooks · 11 months
Text
Tumblr media
Welcome to day one of "Read the Rainbow”
Each day, I’m going to be sharing books focusing on an identity in the LGBTQ+ community.
Today’s focus is on “aromantic”
Check this out to find out what aromantic means and find some cool books with aromantic main characters :)
13 notes · View notes
woolfinbooks · 1 year
Text
Who the fuck is this book for?
Tumblr media
I quit after the 5th chapter. The first 20 minutes were very "Look at me! I'm an activist" and "What about the cis straight women?" Self-proclaiming on her website that her book is "the first book to honor the ways women changed the course of the epidemic" is incorrect. There have been dozens of books about lesbians and bi women's contributions to the AIDS epidemic since around mid-AIDS-pandemic. Does the author not consider lesbian and bi women to be women then? Does she view only straight women as real women?
For most of what I read she didn't say anything positive about gay men. It has only been complaining about how they 'mistreated' her for being straight or that she wanted gay men without AIDS to help her do the literal heavy lifting at work. It felt like any second she was going to say "Breeder is heterophobic!" She spent a few minutes complaining about the lack of representation in AIDS media centering on straight women's contributions. Because nothing says you're an ally like whining about millions of deaths not being centered around you... It would be different if she was talking about the need for women's representation as a whole in AIDS storytelling because THAT is actually looked over. But AIDS-free straight women? Sit the fuck down.
"It's time for straight women to come out of the closet. These stories need to be told" is so completely tone-deaf that I can't comprehend how it got past the editing stage. Why would you compare your "struggles" of being an AIDS ally to coming out? The author may have been an AIDS activist, but it truly doesn't feel like she has ever been an LGBTQ+ activist. Not if she's this comfortable whining about how excluded she was from queer spaces during the height of AIDS. Not when she wrote an entire book centering on cisgender heterosexual AIDS-free women during the height of the AIDS epidemic.
5 notes · View notes
woolfinbooks · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
14K notes · View notes