#Future of Search

[olivergisttv]

Zero-Click Search & SGE: Is Traditional SEO Dying in 2025?

The search landscape is undergoing a seismic shift in 2025. With the rise of Google’s Search Generative Experience (SGE) and zero-click results, the SEO playbook we’ve used for over a decade is being rewritten — in real time. Zero-Click Search & SGE: Is Traditional SEO Dying in 2025? What is Zero-Click Search? A zero-click search occurs when a user’s query is answered directly on the search…

[iammannyj]

ChatGPT Search: A New Era of AI-Powered Search

ChatGPT Search: A New Era of AI-Powered Search

I love bookmarking great resources for fellow SEO enthusiasts. This one’s a keeper! OpenAI’s ChatGPT Search is revolutionizing the way we find information online. By combining AI with a conversational interface, ChatGPT Search offers a more intuitive and efficient search experience. To learn more about this exciting development and its implications for SEO, check out this insightful post from…

[gotogroww]

Voice Search SEO: Optimize Your Content for the Future of Search

Discover how to future-proof your website by optimizing for voice search. This comprehensive guide explores key strategies for enhancing your SEO, driving traffic, and staying ahead of the curve in the evolving landscape of search. Learn actionable tips to tailor your content for voice search and improve your website's visibility in the era of digital assistants like Siri, Alexa, and Google Assistant.

[algoworks]

Ready to see the future of AI inquiry?

Introducing "ChatGPT Search Unleashed" – where cutting-edge technology meets unparalleled convenience.

Explore new horizons in information discovery with AI that understands and responds with precision. Get ready to transform your search experience and unlock the potential of intelligent inquiry.

Join us on this exciting journey!

[bitchy-craft]

PICK A CARD: Google searches that describe your future spouse

Hello and welcome to this reading! Here I will give you google searches that describes your future spouse. I hope you enjoy this reading!

Masterpost > Paid Readings > Patreon Masterlist

The extended version of this reading can be found on my patreon, the link of which is here

Pile 1:

“How to undo sending an email… after 24 hours?”

“Can you get dehydration from forgetting to drink water for 3 days?”

“Is it normal to cry over fictional characters this much?”

“Why do I get my best ideas at 3 AM?”

“How long can you survive on snacks alone?”

“Why did I walk into this room again?”

“Can ADHD make you lose your phone while holding it?”

“Can I cook pasta in the coffee maker?”

“How to win an argument using psychology and fear”

“Did I just gaslight myself?”

Extended reading

Pile 2:

“How to convince people I know what I’m doing”

“If I say something with enough confidence, does it become true?”

“Why do people keep telling me to ‘think things through’?”

“Can you get banned from Uber Eats for too many refund requests?”

“How to gaslight my way into free stuff”

“Signs I might actually be delusional (but like, in a fun way)”

“Can I legally call myself a CEO if I have an Etsy store?”

“How fast can I learn a skill before I have to use it in real life?”

“How to fall asleep when I am literally built different”

“Is it a red flag if I believe I can do anything without trying first?”

Extended reading

Pile 3:

“Why do people tell me their secrets unprompted?”

“Can I manifest chaos just by thinking about it?”

“How to stop saying ‘that’s crazy’ when people trauma dump”

“If I don’t react, do I technically win the argument?”

“Can I get paid for just existing and watching people?”

“Why do I always know the drama even though I’m never involved?”

“How long can you stare at someone before it’s weird?”

“How to give life-changing advice without taking my own”

“What’s the most polite way to say ‘that sounds like a you problem’?”

“Should I be concerned if people call me ‘terrifying’?”

Extended reading

[leminaus]

is it ok to be a little selfish

[thebatmqn]

i’m glad taylor said this because it’s actually something i’ve been wanting to talk about but haven’t, mostly out of fear of leaning too much (perhaps problematically) into a whole ‘mel needs langdon’ thing. but yeah, i always felt that there was a pretty clear difference between MCI mel pre vs. post langdon coming back in that he provided a much needed confidence boost. she’s very clearly nervous at the beginning of episode 12 when robby and abbot are explaining how things are going to go and she’s assigned leader of the yellow zone, but then she sees langdon for the first time after he was fired and she literally lights up, smiles so big after he offers the encouragement he’d been giving her all day. it’s like her entire demeanour changes right after; she’s more in control, taking charge, she’s the one santos and whitaker look towards for guidance in the middle of everything. i don’t know how much (if any at all) of this was on purpose on the show’s part (it could also just be her settling in after the initial chaos!), but if done intentionally, it’s such a neat detail! she was doing great regardless, obviously, but i think it helped her feel much more self-assured even if they didn’t share many more scenes together after the fact.

[amariram]

Sir Gwaine, Sir Percival and Sir Lancelot when at the banquet they see another foreign Lord hitting on Merlin in front of a very pissed Arthur.

[blooodymoon]

A "RETURN of the Number of PERSONS FLOGGED in the BRITISH NAVY, in each of the Years 1845 and 1846; specifying the Name of the Ship, the Offence, the Sentence and the Number of Lashes Infficted." Parlamentary Paper, Number 661 of Session 1847

So after reading the Post about Jopsons Flogging by @handfuloftime I went down a research rabbit hole because I wanted to see if their exist sufficient & specific enough Data to accuratly compare his punishment and put it in the historical context.

I found this Website, which features the two tables from the Parlamentary Papers and their Source.

(Note: The tables on the website are incomplete and inaccurate in certain places. I compared it from top to bottom to the original source and corrected/added the informations in my table.)

I used that as a basis for my own table, where I also added Averages and Sliders so people can search the Informations!

(Apparently Sliders don't work on Mobil, and I don't know enough about Google Sheets how to fix it :/

If anyone knows or if you find a some kind mistake please let me know.)

This week I visited the University Libary, which has access to the Parlamentary Papers Online, to see if such tables also exist for earlier years but sadly 1845 was the first year where they went into such Specifics.

(I hope to add some of the Years after 1846 to the table, when I can.)

Earlier years only had these Informations per Year:

Total Number of Punishments

Total Number of Lashes

Highest Number of Lashes Inflicted at One Time

Lowest Number of Lashes Inflicted at One Time

This Information for 1839 - 1846 under the Cut.

Also under the Read More are some Graphs, Medians & Averages about Flogging for Drunkenness Alone, seperated by Seamen, Marines, Boys and Everyone!

Hope that someone find this useful/interesting !

Corporal Punishment for Drunkenness Alone

Everyone:

Lashes Sentenced Median: 32,75 (1845: 36 | 1846: 31,4)

Lashes Sentenced Average: 31,07 (1845: 31,13 | 1846: 31,02)

Lashes Inflicted Average: 30,8 (1845: 31,02 | 1846: 30,58)

Seamen:

Lashes Sentenced Median: 36 (1845: 36 | 1846: 36)

Lashes Sentenced Average: 34,37 (1845: 34,62 | 1846: 33,86)

Lashes Inflicted Average: 34,33 (1845: 34,41 | 1846: 33,86)

Marines:

Lashes Sentenced Median: 31,4 (1845: 32 | 1846: 31,4)

Lashes Sentenced Average: 30,8 (1845: 31,09 | 1846: 31,09)

Lashes Inflicted Average: 30,8 (1845: 31,09 | 1846: 30,69)

Boys:

Lashes Sentenced Median: 24 (1845: 24 | 1846: 33)

Lashes Sentenced Average: 26,22 (1845: 24,4 | 1846: 28,5)

Lashes Inflicted Average: 25,33 (1845: 24,4 | 1846: 26,5)

Years

1839:

Number of Punishments: 2,007

Number of Lashes: 59,341

Highest: 60 | Lowest: 3

1840:

Number of Punishments: 2,026

Number of Lashes: 60,302

Highest: 48 | Lowest: 1

1841:

Number of Punishments: 2,066

Number of Lashes: 61,669

Highest: 50 | Lowest: 2

1842:

Number of Punishments: 2,472

Number of Lashes: 71,024

Highest: 100* | Lowest: 1

1843:

Number of Punishments: 2,170

Number of Lashes: 63,985

Highest: 60 | Lowest: 3

1844:

Number of Punishments: 1,411

Number of Lashes: 42,352

Highest: 72+ | Lowest: 6

1845:

Number of Punishments: 1,070

Number of Lashes: 33,511

Highest: 48 | Lowest: 3

1846:

Number of Punishments: 1,077

Number of Lashes: 32,360

Highest: 50* | Lowest: 3

*By sentence of a Court Martial.

+By order of the Commander-in-Chief for theft, in a shop at Chusan, and violence to the natives.

Sources: A "RETURN of the CORPORAL PUNISHMENTS inflicted in the ROYAL NAVY, in each of the Years 1839 to 1843, both inclusive, stating the highest and lowest Number of Lashes at each Time, and the aggregate Number of Lashes in each Year [ ]" Parlamentary Paper, Number 308, of Session 1845 + ABSTRACT of Total Numbers of CORPORAL PUNISHMENTS inflicted in the NAVY, and the Total Number of LASHES Inflicted, in each Year up to the 31st December 1846 [ ]. Parlamentary Paper, Number 661, of Session 1847

[textsearchbradleycarlgeigerbrad]

TEXT SEARCH BRADLEY CARL GEIGER AND BRAD GEIGER AND EVERYTHING ASSOCIATED

BRAD GEIGER AND CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY

BRADLEY CARL GEIGER AND CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY

BRAD GEIGER AND WIKIPEDIA

BRADLEY CARL GEIGER AND WIKIPEDIA

[lambilegs]

spent way too long on butch-femme twitter and am now heading to sleep at 5AM with a pit in my tummy about potentially never finding the right person one day </3

[kit-screams-into-the-future]

how would doc brown fit into the delorean if he was a horse? wondered no one ever.

behold: the dehorselean.

[tangled-wires-and-a-dead-heart]

It is fascinating to me that, despite being one of the games love interests, Avery is essentially an optional part of the game. Like I'm thinking about it and the time that you are actually forced to interact with/be in general proximity to Avery is significantly less than every single other one of the potential love interests, even moreso now that the update has come out and you can completely avoid even meeting Avery until the third episode (and even then I don't think you actually learn their name. And you barely even interact with them).

All of the instances of you actually interacting with Avery (going to the diner in ep 1, seeing them on the street talking to Sybil in ep 2, hanging out with them in ep 3, and talking to them at the diner when you're looking for Stella in ep 4 (assuming that they haven't joined you to look for Stella beforehand)) are optional and can almost completely be avoided. You have to actively try to hang out with and include them in activities because they won't naturally be invited along.

[wishchip106]

YOU ABANDONED ME!

YOU ABANDONED US ALL!

[curapicas]

I thank Ryoko Kui from the bottom of my heart for making Kabru's TWO descents into the depths of (desire) the dungeon to go after Laios and the dungeon' secrets be possible because:

1- he met a man who was running himself ragged after the woman he loved and

2- he met a man who was running himself ragged after the sinister demon that he's obsessed with.

[wings-of-flying]

chip, jay, gillion. past, present, future. continue