#Universal Ethics

[omegaphilosophia]

The Philosophy of Absolutism

Absolutism in philosophy is the belief that certain truths, values, principles, or laws are universally valid and unchanging, regardless of individual perspectives, cultural differences, or situational contexts. Absolutists maintain that there are objective standards that apply to all people at all times. It stands in contrast to relativism and subjectivism, which argue that truth or morality is contingent on individual or cultural factors.

Key Aspects of Absolutism:

1. Epistemological Absolutism

Objective Truth: Absolutism in epistemology holds that there are absolute truths that exist independently of human knowledge or perception. These truths are universally valid, and human reason or inquiry can discover them.

Certainty in Knowledge: Epistemological absolutists believe that it is possible to attain certain and objective knowledge about the world. This contrasts with epistemological relativism, where truth is seen as relative to individual or cultural perspectives.

2. Moral Absolutism

Universal Moral Standards: Moral absolutism asserts that there are objective and unchanging moral principles that apply to all individuals, regardless of their situation or culture. For example, an absolutist might claim that lying is always wrong, no matter the circumstances.

Moral Objectivity: According to this view, morality is not based on personal feelings or societal norms but on universal ethical rules. Moral principles are seen as inherent to the nature of reality or human beings.

Divine Command and Natural Law: Some versions of moral absolutism are grounded in religious or metaphysical beliefs, such as the idea that moral laws are dictated by a divine being (divine command theory) or arise from the natural order of the universe (natural law theory).

3. Metaphysical Absolutism

Objective Reality: Metaphysical absolutism posits that there is a single, objective reality that exists independently of human perception. The world and its laws exist in a fixed state, regardless of how individuals or cultures perceive or interpret them.

Unchanging Nature of Reality: This view denies the idea that reality is constructed by human minds or is relative to different perspectives. Reality is what it is, and human beings can understand it through reason and inquiry.

4. Ethical and Legal Absolutism

Objective Moral Duties: Ethical absolutism holds that certain actions are morally right or wrong regardless of circumstances or consequences. For example, killing an innocent person is always wrong, no matter the situation.

Universal Laws: In legal or political absolutism, there is the belief that some laws or principles of justice should be universally applied, regardless of cultural differences. These are seen as immutable standards that transcend human invention.

5. Aesthetic Absolutism

Objective Standards of Beauty: In aesthetics, absolutism holds that beauty is not merely in the eye of the beholder but has objective standards. Certain works of art, forms, or expressions are considered universally beautiful or valuable.

Timeless Art: Absolutists in aesthetics may argue that some artistic creations or forms of expression have lasting and objective value, transcending time and culture.

Absolutism vs. Relativism:

Absolutism maintains that truth, morality, and reality are objective, universal, and unchanging.

Relativism holds that truth, morality, and knowledge are context-dependent and vary based on individual, societal, or cultural factors.

Criticism of Absolutism:

Cultural Differences: Critics argue that absolutism overlooks the diversity of human cultures and experiences. What may seem like a universal truth in one context may not apply in another. This criticism is especially strong in moral absolutism, where cultural relativists argue that morality is context-dependent.

Moral Dilemmas: Absolutism can struggle to address complex moral dilemmas where strict adherence to a universal principle might lead to negative outcomes. For instance, if lying is always wrong, is it wrong to lie to save a life?

Inflexibility: Absolutism is often criticized for being rigid and dogmatic, leaving little room for adaptation to new knowledge or changing circumstances. This can make it difficult to apply in diverse, modern societies.

Absolutism asserts that there are objective, unchanging truths and values, often grounded in rationality, natural law, or divine authority. While it offers a clear and stable framework for understanding the world, it faces criticism for its rigidity and inability to account for human diversity.

[r0semultiverse]

WHAT HAPPENED TO THE ORIGINAL MARCELINE OF THE WINTER KING'S UNIVERSE!? 😨

Is the implication that Ice King took her out with all of the other oozers or did the oozers end up killing her?? Either way, it seems that this Simon was not coping well with any of what was going on in his life. Living a life of hypocrisy & ruling a false kingdom.

[incognitopolls]

We ask your questions so you don’t have to! Submit your questions to have them posted anonymously as polls.

[mizaruwu]

it's complicated and ethically questionable

---

more dungeon meshi x linked universe shenanigans featuring communication fairies (and the creation of one for the image below, tw blood)

welcome to the world

[rotzaprachim]

im shaking every single student organizer and screaming that they need to separate a demand to divest from arms funding from the demand for a university to cut off all contact with Israeli and Israeli-American scholars and students, a demand which no university will agree to because implementing it would in many cases be very illegal

[zoonnoryx]

Forgot to post this hehe

Here’s a bit more of tidepod- I mean Zenntale!Gaster :3

[letsplaythermalnuclearwar]

look at this diagram I spent entirely too long on

[ohholydyke]

Actually the Great Commission is about generating a culture of love and care between diverse interconnected global communities not about colonizing and trying to convert groups because you think their way of life is somehow lesser unless they approach the Divine from a Christian lens

[phemiec]

holy shit that might have been my favorite Severance episode yet

(Spoilers below for S2E6 “Attila”)

The razor sharp tension throughout, everything is so thick and messy right now, the fucking ETHICS of it all. The most fraught fucking 50 minutes of moral conundrums I’ve ever seen. It had everything: Sex, consent, love, death, god, the soul and afterlife, lies and betrayal, sweetness and connection in the most unfuckingfathomably dark and complicated situations.

I can’t fucking handle this show. Every single plot thread and relationship is driving me completely apoplectic.

[lobeliamaximoff]

has anybody considered this?

[omegaphilosophia]

The Philosophy of Cosmopolitanism

The philosophy of cosmopolitanism is an ethical and political framework that emphasizes the idea of universal citizenship and global responsibility, advocating for the recognition and respect of shared humanity across cultural, national, and ethnic boundaries. Cosmopolitanism suggests that all human beings, regardless of their affiliations or origins, are part of a single moral community with duties and obligations to one another.

Core Principles of Cosmopolitanism

Universal Humanity: Cosmopolitanism asserts that all people are fundamentally equal and deserving of respect, regardless of national or cultural distinctions. This principle encourages the view that moral concern should not stop at borders or differences but extend globally.

Moral and Ethical Universalism: Cosmopolitans believe in universal moral principles that apply to everyone. These principles are often drawn from the idea that certain rights and values, like human dignity and freedom, are shared by all, thus requiring a global commitment to justice and ethics.

Global Citizenship: Cosmopolitanism encourages individuals to see themselves as “citizens of the world.” This concept suggests that while we may belong to specific countries or communities, we have a responsibility to contribute positively to the broader human community.

Cultural Respect and Diversity: While cosmopolitanism promotes universal principles, it also respects cultural differences. The idea is not to erase identities but to celebrate and learn from them, finding common ground while honoring diversity.

Global Justice and Responsibility: Cosmopolitanism calls for ethical obligations that transcend local or national interests. This might involve addressing global issues such as poverty, climate change, and human rights violations, recognizing that such issues affect humanity as a whole.

Interconnectedness: Cosmopolitanism stresses the interconnectedness of individuals and nations in today’s globalized world, both socially and economically. By recognizing this interconnectedness, cosmopolitans argue that our actions have far-reaching consequences and, therefore, carry global ethical responsibilities.

Influential Thinkers in Cosmopolitanism

Diogenes of Sinope: In ancient Greece, Diogenes claimed to be a “citizen of the world,” challenging the idea of local identity by advocating for a more inclusive vision of community.

Immanuel Kant: Kant envisioned a world governed by universal moral laws and advocated for perpetual peace through international cooperation and respect for human rights.

Martha Nussbaum: Contemporary philosopher Martha Nussbaum has developed a cosmopolitan approach to education and global justice, arguing that individuals should be trained to think beyond local allegiances.

Kwame Anthony Appiah: Appiah’s concept of “rooted cosmopolitanism” suggests that people can maintain local identities while being committed to global moral values.

Cosmopolitanism in Practice

Human Rights Movements: Cosmopolitanism underpins international human rights organizations, which work to protect and promote rights regardless of nationality.

Environmental Justice: Addressing global issues like climate change is inherently cosmopolitan, as environmental issues impact all humans and demand global cooperation.

Migration and Refugees: Cosmopolitan principles influence humanitarian approaches to refugees and migrants, advocating for respect, support, and fair treatment across borders.

Global Education: Cosmopolitan education emphasizes teaching individuals to understand and appreciate global diversity, fostering empathy and a sense of responsibility toward global issues.

Critiques of Cosmopolitanism

Lack of Practicality: Critics argue that cosmopolitanism can be idealistic and challenging to implement because of practical concerns with sovereignty, political structures, and the varied interests of nations.

Cultural and National Identity: Some argue that cosmopolitanism could undermine national and cultural identities, creating a “one-size-fits-all” approach that overlooks local customs and traditions.

Economic Inequality: Critics contend that cosmopolitanism can unintentionally support neoliberal economic policies, which may benefit global elites at the expense of local communities.

Cosmopolitanism’s Vision for the Future

Cosmopolitanism envisions a world where individuals and nations act from a shared commitment to justice, dignity, and equality, fostering a society that balances local identities with universal values. It challenges us to think beyond borders, to act with empathy toward all, and to create structures that promote fairness and understanding globally.

[kessfansworld]

i’m gonna ask the question that has been on my mind for a while. what do people think about the fact that there’s accounts who have ai generated voiceover reading tumblr posts, because these videos get so many views. sometimes they even go viral. sometimes the username from the original user is cut down and there’s just no way to find the original account and give them love. it’s mostly from dc fandom, which i frequent. i don’t know, just how do people feel about this? how does the fandom feel about this, because what i would perfer is them sharing the original tumblr post, leaving a link for us to find the og post and give them our love and respect, and also leave the username in, don’t cut it out and not that ai voiceover. that’s what i would perfer but this isn’t about me. i just can’t imagine coming up with an idea and seeing it going viral and my username isn’t even there, and it’s ai voiceover. i don’t know—something about it is just off. i know i’m big believer of generative ai having no place in fandom

[noosphe-re]

The very nature of materiality is an entanglement. Matter itself is always already open to, or rather entangled with, the "Other." The intra-actively emergent "parts" of phenomena are co­constituted. Not only subjects but also objects are permeated through and through with their entangled kin; the other is not just in one's skin, but in one's bones, in one's belly, in one's heart, in one's nucleus, in one's past and future.

Karen Barad, Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning

[formerlyashkatom]

it is once again time for me to win an argument, unless you all disagree with me, in which case this time I will put down my phone, exhale a short breath through my nose, and wade into the sea in an attempt to subsume my identity into something greater than myself. please reblog for a greater sample size and to inflict psychic damage upon me with your commentary.

caveats: no vanilla extract/both/neither/I'm bald, we die on these hills. it does not matter for the purposes of option 1 in this case what the universal imperatives are, just that (your stance is) they exist, but if you want to define what they are in reblog commentary I may then hold a deathmatch of everyone's definitions in a future poll because that would be funny to me.

[zolanort]

Was reading @zartophski ‘s Pokemon AU and Four absolutely would be an eeveelution guy with an Umbreon named Shadow you are so correct

[maggotbrainzzzz]

Been cooking something… :3

Welcome to Ethical* Tycooning.