#be gay do crime?

[yoursdeadlynightshade]

Regulus gets jealous. Yes.

And James?

Oh..

James gets possessive.

[is-it-sarcoidosis]

multiple times a day my sister randomly rattles off “house we need to cure this patient” (occasionally in a horrible australian accent) which, of course, has only one appropriate way for me to respond.

[wilson-apologist]

The collection so far. If anyone has any other ones, pleaseeee I need them

[doingartiguess]

Some more new FanArt for the season, as a treat 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈✨❤️‍🔥

ENJOY, VILLAINS!

I did art from the animation not Stevenson’s original work not out of disrespect to anyone, I just found the animation first! But thanks to all for making me ugly cry on my couch 🫠

[woogly-boogly]

i really wanna have sex with my friend (we are both males) but i’m not gay. would it be more straighet for me to fuck him or to let him fuck me?

[i-need-of-a-hobby]

i love seeing fic writers put "i dont support jkr!!!!" in their summaries-

like, yeah, i appreciate the sentiment but sweetheart, you're writing wolfstar a/b/o with the tags "background starchaser" and "trans regulus." i wouldn't have assumed you supported a terf sweetie.

[loth-creatures]

🏳️‍🌈BE GAY DO CRIMES 🏳️‍⚧️BE GAY DO CRIMES 🏳️‍🌈 BE G A Y DO CRIMES🏳️‍⚧️ FINALLY FINISHED YEEHAW 

MAY THE 4TH BE WITH YOU FUCKERS

NOW GO CAUSE SOME TROUBLE KARK SHIT UP LETS GOOOO

[911-incorrect-quotes-dispatch]

Captain Gerrard: Buckley, did you wash the fire engine?

Buck: No, I did not.

Captain Gerrard: And why would that be?

Buck: Because it's June, which means I'm not responsible for any of my actions and if you try to make me complete any tasks you are homophobic. Right Hen?

Hen: Sorry cap, but he is correct, we both have gay month immunity.

[songofsoma]

yeah i support women’s right

but more importantly i support women’s WRONGS

[milkymittens]

“i need a friend. i need to know that you’re there. i need you to tell me that my life was worthwhile, and i need you to tell me that you love me.”

— s08e21

[whydidisavethistomyphone]

This is the same logic as “be gay do crimes” because if something out of your control, like your sexuality, makes you a criminal, then you’re already a criminal, why are you obeying the law? What do you have to gain from it?

We have human rights so we don’t have to fight, steal or kill for the basics. It seems like the people in charge have forgotten how the world used to work.

[yoursdeadlynightshade]

James Potter is a neck kisser and a waist grabber.

Regulus Black is a neck grabber and a fierce biter.

[is-it-sarcoidosis]

my favourite flavour of house outro is when they show all the happy couples being all together and cute and stuff and then they show hilson being hilson

[radicalgraff]

"Be Gay, Do Crimes.

Be Trans Ride Trams ( advocate for free public transport)"

Seen in Dublin, Ireland

[artistalley]

Crimes Cat Sticker

Four-inch glossy vinyl sticker of a cat ready to commit some queer crimes.

Use code GAYWORM for 10% off the entire order from both of @skiddykid's stores. Explore more of their work right here on @artistalley.

This month, Tumblr's Artist Alley is highlighting some of Tumblr's amazing LGBTQIA+ artists for #june on tumblr.

Are you an artist with a store or open commissions? Want more eyes on your work? Submit your art to Artist Alley for the chance to be featured across Tumblr.

[hedgehogcryptid]

I’ve realized that the main reason I don’t give a fuck about Red Hood’s actual canon crimes is not that I think they’re justified, or reasonable, or even just funny. He has been shown doing very fucked up shit that at times has very little, if anything, to do with any reasonable moral code. But the reason I don’t care is that I’ve steadily become very critical of villain framing. It’s so very common to have a villain say something very reasonable like “poor people shouldn’t die” and then complement it with “and I will kill babies about it.” If the first statement is reasonable, and the narrative does not provide a reason that justifies the balls-to-the-wall batshit “solution” the character came up with, then I assume the author is either deliberately or subconsciously villainizing a specific group of people for no reason, and I don’t vibe with that. At that time I no longer care about what the author/narrative actually has to say and my reaction becomes “the narrator is actually a biased witness and anything they say about this person’s actions should be taken as exaggeration”. Oh, so Jason is an indiscriminate killer who thinks every petty criminal deserves to die? Wrong. They’re exaggerating and taking the facts out of context. So he killed a hundred people in prison with barely any provocation? It probably wasn’t that many and the ones he did were trying to kill him to begin with, with no intervention from the guards, so it was self defense. He attempted to kill a child? Wrong, that was a two-sided fight between two teenagers, he just won so the other one’s bitter. Like, I don’t care how much made up context I need to stuff in there to make it make sense, I will do it because the narrative decided to frame the homeless kid from a poor neighborhood as the villain against the nice and kindhearted humanitarian billionaire so its logic is fucked from the get-go